Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/13/2015 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Regular MeetingLandmark Preservation Commission Page 1 May 13, 2015 Ron Sladek, Chair Doug Ernest, Vice Chair City Council Chambers Maren Bzdek City Hall West Meg Dunn 300 Laporte Avenue Kristin Gensmer Fort Collins, Colorado Per Hogestad Dave Lingle Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 Alexandra Wallace on the Comcast cable system Belinda Zink Laurie Kadrich Karen McWilliams Josh Weinberg Gino Campana Staff Liaison, CDNS Director Preservation Planner Preservation Planner Council Liaison The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Regular Meeting May 13, 2015  CALL TO ORDER  ROLL CALL  PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA  CONSENT AGENDA 1. DESIGN REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE FINAL REVIEW - FIRST BANK, 100 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to give final approval to the treatments for the metal finishes on the bank building at 100 South College Avenue, reviewed by the LPC Design Review Subcommittee at its April 22, 2015 Work Session APPLICANT: Don Bernholtz and Jim Cox, Architecture Plus  PULLED FROM CONSENT  DISCUSSION AGENDA Landmark Preservation Commission City of Fort Collins Page 2 2. FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE MICHAUD HOUSE AT 404 WHEDBEE STREET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Staff is pleased to present for your consideration the Michaud House located at 404 Whedbee Street. The property has significance to Fort Collins under Landmark Preservation Standard C. APPLICANT: Mark and Denise McFann 3. 215 MATHEWS STREET OFFICE BUILDING: REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for a Preliminary Design Review for a proposed 3 story, 9,060 square foot office building with the ground level serving primarily as covered parking. The existing 1,054 square foot single family home and small shed on the 7,000 square foot lot have been determined to not be individually eligible for Landmark designation, and would be demolished. The property is located in the N-C-B, Neighborhood Conservation, Buffer District zone. APPLICANT: Greg Fisher, Greg D. Fisher Architect  OTHER BUSINESS  ADJOURNMENT Agenda Item 1 Item # 1 Page 1 STAFF REPORT May 13, 2015 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME DESIGN REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE FINAL REVIEW - FIRST BANK, 100 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to give final approval to the treatments for the metal finishes on the bank building at 100 South College Avenue, reviewed by the LPC Design Review Subcommittee at its April 22, 2015 Work Session APPLICANT: Don Bernholtz and Jim Cox, Architecture Plus OWNER: 1st Bank of Colorado, Adam Snyder, VP of Facilities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The First Bank building at 100 South College Avenue has been found to be eligible for individual designation as a Fort Collins Landmark under Standard 1 (A) for its association with Auto Based Banking; and Standard 3 (C), as an excellent example of mid-century commercial architecture. Plans for restoring and rehabilitating the building’s window framing systems were reviewed by the Commission most recently at its April 22, 2015 Work Session. Municipal Code 14-72(c) enables plans to be reviewed by the Design Review Subcommittee. The Chair and Commission Members have established a policy that, for non-residential projects, the subcommittee may be comprised of all interested members of the Commission, rather than by a two or three member subcommittee, as typically occurs with single family residential reviews. SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION: At this meeting, the Design Review Subcommittee shall vote on a Final Recommendation for Approval to the Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services. If the vote is unanimous, then the Director may approve the application. If the vote is not unanimous, the project would proceed under the Demolition/Alteration Review Process. The motion should take into consideration the review criteria: REVIEW CRITERIA: The review criteria are established in 14-72(d)(1), which states: In making a determination concerning the proposal, the Subcommittee shall consider the following criteria: a. The effect of the proposed work upon the general historical and/or architectural character of the landmark or landmark district; b. The architectural style, arrangement, texture and materials of existing and proposed improvements, and their relation to the landmark or the sites, structures and objects in the district; c. The effects of the proposed work in creating, changing, obscuring or destroying the exterior characteristics of the site, structure or object upon which such work is to be done; 1 Packet Pg. 3 Agenda Item 1 Item # 1 Page 2 d. The effect of the proposed work upon the protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of the landmark or landmark district; and e. The extent to which the proposed work meets the standards of the City and the United States Secretary of the Interior for the preservation, reconstruction, restoration or rehabilitation of historic resources. ATTACHMENTS 1. 1st Bank_ 4.22.15_Presentation (PDF) 1 Packet Pg. 4 1st Bank –NW View 1st Bank, 100 S. College Ave 1 1.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: 1st Bank_ 4.22.15_Presentation (3142 : Design Review Subcommittee Final Review - First Bank, 100 South College Avenue) North Elevation –Proposed Treatment 1st Bank, 100 S. College Ave 2 INSTALL NEW HEAVIER GAUGE ANODIZED ALUMINUM (MATCH EXISTING) KICK‐PLATES TO RESIST DENTS. (REPLACE DAMAGED) INSTALL NEW HEAVIER GAUGE STAINLESS STEEL (MATCH EXISTING) KICK‐PLATES TO RESIST DENTS. (REPLACE DAMAGED) INSTALL NEW HEAVIER GAUGE STAINLESS STEEL (MATCH EXISTING) VERTICAL COVER AT BOTTOM 1/3 SECTIONS. 1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 1st Bank_ 4.22.15_Presentation (3142 : Design Review Subcommittee Final Review - First Bank, 100 South College Avenue) West Elevation –Proposed Treatment 1st Bank, 100 S. College Ave 3 INSTALL NEW HEAVIER GAUGE ANODIZED ALUMINUM (MATCH EXISTING) KICK‐PLATES TO RESIST DENTS. (REPLACE DAMAGED) INSTALL NEW HEAVIER GAUGE STAINLESS STEEL (MATCH EXISTING) KICK‐PLATES TO RESIST DENTS. (REPLACE DAMAGED) INSTALL NEW HEAVIER GAUGE STAINLESS STEEL (MATCH EXISTING) VERTICAL COVER AT BOTTOM 1/3 SECTIONS. REPLACE 2 DAMAGED ANODIZED ALUMINUM (MATCH EXISTING FINISH) SILL MULLIONS TO MATCH ADJACENT SILL COMPONENTS. 1.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 1st Bank_ 4.22.15_Presentation (3142 : Design Review Subcommittee Final Review - First Bank, 100 South College Avenue) Stainless Steel Sample 1st Bank, 100 S. College Ave 4 1.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 1st Bank_ 4.22.15_Presentation (3142 : Design Review Subcommittee Final Review - First Bank, 100 South College Avenue) Proposed Treatment at West Window Sill Areas 1st Bank, 100 S. College Ave 5 REPLACE 2 DAMAGED SILL MULLIONS. INSTALL HEAVIER GAUGE KICK‐ PLATE TO RESIST DENTS. REPLACE ALL WEST (NON‐ORIG.) KICKPLATES WITH ANODIZED ALUMINUM TO MATCH EXIST. MULLIONS. INSTALL HEAVIER GAUGE S.S. COVERING AT DAMAGED VERTICALS. 1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 1st Bank_ 4.22.15_Presentation (3142 : Design Review Subcommittee Final Review - First Bank, 100 South College Avenue) Proposed Treatment at North Window Sill Area 1st Bank, 100 S. College Ave 6 REPLACE DAMAGED KICKPLATES WITH ANODIZED ALUMINUM (MATCH EXISTING). IMPROVE SEALANT JOINTS. EXISTING MULLIONS TO BE CLEANED ONLY AT NORTH. 1.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: 1st Bank_ 4.22.15_Presentation (3142 : Design Review Subcommittee Final Review - First Bank, 100 South College Avenue) Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 Page 1 STAFF REPORT May 13, 2015 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE MICHAUD HOUSE AT 404 WHEDBEE STREET STAFF Josh Weinberg, City Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Staff is pleased to present for your consideration the Michaud House located at 404 Whedbee Street. The property has significance to Fort Collins under Landmark Preservation Standard C. APPLICANT: Mark and Denise McFann OWNER: Mark and Denise McFann RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the Michaud House qualifies for Landmark designation under Fort Collins Landmark Designation Standard C. If the Landmark Preservation Commission determines that the property is eligible under this standard, then the Commission may pass a resolution recommending City Council pass an ordinance designating the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street as a Fort Collins Landmark according to City Code Chapter 14 under Designation Standard C. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street, a contributing element of the Laurel School Historic District, is significant under Fort Collins Landmark Designation Standard C, as a well preserved example of an early 20th century Classic Cottage. The building retains preponderance of all six aspects of integrity, A through G. The hipped roof, full width porch, simple floorplan, and gabled front dormer are all characteristics of the Classic Cottage style. Furthermore, this style reflects the early 20th century ideals of conservativism and simplicity. The extravagance and ornamentation of the Gilded Age were interpreted as a lack of social concern so styles with less ostentatious decorations like the Classic Cottage became popular. This backlash stemmed from economic hardships in the 1890s. The Classic Cottage was extremely popular in Fort Collins during the early twentieth century. The location, design, setting, and materials largely remained the same throughout the years. The details in the gable end show elaborate workmanship. Together, the lack of prominent changes helps this home retain a historic feeling. Also, the home continues to be associated with the Laurel School Historic District. 2 Packet Pg. 11 Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 Page 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. 404_whedbee_vicinity (PDF) 2. 404 Whedbee (DOC) 3. 404 Whedbee Elevations (DOCX) 2 Packet Pg. 12 Library Park «¬14 Smith St Peterson St Whedbee St E Myrtle St E Olive St E Magnolia St E Oak St Lilac Ln Stover St E Mulberry St Riverside Ave © 404 Vicinity Whedbee Map St 1 inch = 250 feet Site 2.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: 404_whedbee_vicinity (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) Revised 08-2014 Page 1 Fort Collins Landmark Designation LOCATION INFORMATION: Address: 404 Whedbee Street Legal Description: South 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 164, Fort Collins, Colorado Property Name (historic and/or common): Michaud House OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Timothy Mark and Denise Lea McFann Email: mmcfann@castalongshadow.com Address: 517 E Magnolia Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 CLASSIFICATION Category Ownership Status Present Use Existing Designation Building Public Occupied Commercial Nat’l Register Structure Private Unoccupied Educational State Register Site Religious Object Residential District Entertainment Government Other FORM PREPARED BY: Name and Title: Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planning Intern Address: City of Fort Collins, Historic Preservation Department, P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522 Phone: 828-499-1235 Email: cbumgarner@fcgov.com Relationship to Owner: None Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.41 0 970.22 4- fax fcgov.c 2.b Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 404 Whedbee (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) Revised 08-2014 Page 2 TYPE OF DESIGNATION and BOUNDARIES Individual Landmark Property Landmark District Explanation of Boundaries: The boundaries of the property being designated as a Fort Collins Landmark correspond to the legal description of the property, above. SIGNIFICANCE Properties are eligible for designation if they possess significance, which is the importance of a site, structure, object or district to the history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture of our community, State or Nation. For designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts properties must meet one (1) or more of the following standards: Standard A: Events. This property is associated with events that have made a recognizable contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the community, State or Nation. It is associated with either (or both) of these two (2) types of events: 1. A specific event marking an important moment in Fort Collins prehistory or history; and/or 2. A pattern of events or a historic trend that made a recognizable contribution to the development of the community, State or Nation. Standard B: Persons/Groups. This property is associated with the lives of persons or groups of persons recognizable in the history of the community, State or Nation whose specific contributions to that history can be identified and documented. Standard C: Design/Construction. This property embodies the identifiable characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; represents the work of a craftsman or architect whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality; possesses high artistic values or design concepts; or is part of a recognizable and distinguishable group of properties. Standard D: Information potential. This property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. 2.b Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 404 Whedbee (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) Revised 08-2014 Page 3 EXTERIOR INTEGRITY Properties are eligible for designation if they possess exterior integrity, which is the ability of a site, structure, object or district to be able to convey its significance. The exterior integrity of a resource is based on the degree to which it retains all or some of seven (7) aspects or qualities: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. All seven qualities do not need to be present for a site, structure, object or district to be eligible as long as the overall sense of past time and place is evident. Standard A: Location. This property is located where it was originally constructed or where an historic event occurred. Standard B: Design. This property retains a combination of elements that create its historic form, plan space, structure, and style. Standard C: Setting. This property retains a character and relationship with its surroundings that reflect how and where it was originally situated in relation to its surrounding features and open space. Standard D: Materials. This property retains much of the historic physical elements that originally formed the property. Standard E: Workmanship. This property possesses evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. This consists of evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering the building, structure or site. Standard F: Feeling. This property expresses the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. This results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character. Standard G: Association. This property retains an association, or serves as a direct link to, an important historic event or person. It retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. 2.b Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 404 Whedbee (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) Revised 08-2014 Page 4 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and EXTERIOR INTEGRITY (Please describe why the property is significant, relative to the Standard(s) above, and how it possesses exterior integrity.) The Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street, a contributing element of the Laurel School Historic District, is significant under Fort Collins Landmark Designation Standard C, as a well preserved example of an early 20 th century Classic Cottage. The building retains preponderance of all six aspects of integrity, A through G. The hipped roof, full width porch, simple floorplan, and gabled front dormer are all characteristics of the Classic Cottage style. Furthermore, this style reflects the early 20 th century ideals of conservativism and simplicity. The extravagance and ornamentation of the Gilded Age were interpreted as a lack of social concern so styles with less ostentatious decorations like the Classic Cottage became popular. This backlash stemmed from economic hardships in the 1890s. The Classic Cottage was extremely popular in Fort Collins during the early twentieth century. 1 The location, design, setting, and materials largely remained the same throughout the years. The details in the gable end show elaborate workmanship. Together, the lack of prominent changes helps this home retain a historic feeling. Also, the home continues to be associated with the Laurel School Historic District. 1 “Sugar Beets, Streetcar Suburbs, and the City Beautiful, 1900-1919,” History Connection, http://history.fcgov.com/archive/contexts/sugar.php. 2.b Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 404 Whedbee (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) Revised 08-2014 Page 5 HISTORICAL INFORMATION (Please include city directory research and/or a title search if the property is important for its association with a significant person.) Joe and Lizzie Michaud were the first occupants of the residence, built sometime between March 1906 and September 1909. 2 Joe, son of one of Larimer County’s early pioneer settlers, was born on August 4, 1869 in Brighton, Colorado. Patriarch Frank Michaud traded his Brighton farm to Joe Mason for 160 acres along current day North Shields Street in 1871. The Hoffman Milling Company’s flour mill employed Joe Michaud as a miller. The Michauds lived at 404 Whedbee until at least 1910. By 1913-14, laborer Frank Frey and his wife Nora moved into the home. In the 1920s, at least two different families occupied the home: T. Jefferson Van Sickle and his wife Sybil (1922), followed by Harry and Katherine Eaton (1927). The Fort Collins Rubber Company employed Harry Eaton as a vulcanizer. The Eatons were not the owners of the home though; the owner, Mrs. Mary Elizabeth Williams was issued a permit for “repairs” at an estimated cost of $175 on October 8, 1927. 3 By 1931, Marshall O’Brien, an “oil pumper,” and his wife Grace lived in the home. On May 9, 1939, E. Meyer, owner of the home, was issued a permit for reroofing. 4 At that time, William Parmiter and his wife Anna resided there. 5 In 1940, a practical nurse, Ida Arnbrecht, moved into the home. Sometime in the 1940s, longtime residents Alex and Katherine Robertus moved into the home. 6 These German-Russian immigrants came to Fort Collins in 1912 and were married in December of 1913. After settling in the Fort Collins area, Alex farmed and later worked for the City of Fort Collins (possibly as a grounds keeper for Grandview Cemetery). The Robertus owned the home in 1944, evident by the permit issued to Alex on February 2, 1944 for repairs to the porch. 7 On May 24, 1945, Alex was issued a permit to re-shingle the garage. 8 Alex retired by 1959 and passed away in the home in March of 1963. Katherine remained in the home until her own death, two years later in July of 1965. After 1965, residents included Robert L. and JoAnn Rogers (1968), retiree Henry Saken and his wife Mary (1970s), and Colorado State University student David Lanaghen (1985). In 2003 while Laurel Buchanan owned the property, the front porch was rehabilitated. The exterior integrity remains intact. 9 Current owners Denise and Timothy McFann bought the property in 2014. It continues to be a single family dwelling. 2 The first time that the home appears in the city directory is in 1908, but there are no records for the building of this home. 3 City of Fort Collins Building Permit No. 1837, October 8, 1927, “Repairs,” accessed at history.fcgov.com. 4 City of Fort Collins Building Permit No. 5752, May 9, 1939, “Reroofing,” accessed at history.fcgov.com. 5 Polk’s Fort Collins City Directory, 1939 (Omaha, Nebraska: R. L. Polk & Co., 1948), 115. 6 Fort Collins city directories are unavailable between 1941 and 1947, making their move to the home difficult to pinpoint with precision. 7 City of Fort Collins Building Permit No. 7647, February 2, 1944 “Repairs on porch.,” accessed at history.fcgov.com. 8 City of Fort Collins Building Permit No. 8345, May 24, 1945, “Reshingle garage,” accessed at history.fcgov.com. 9 City of Fort Collins Building Permit No. B0301208, May 14, 2003, Building Permit from CityDocs. 2.b Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: 404 Whedbee (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) Revised 08-2014 Page 6 ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Construction Date: 1908 Architect/Builder: Unknown Building Materials: Wood, stone Architectural Style: Classic Cottage Description: (Please include any special features of the property/surroundings, as well as dates and descriptions of any additions or alterations to the buildings or structures.) This historic home is well preserved and located on the east side of 400 block of Whedbee Street. The home is set up on a slight hill with concrete steps leading from the sidewalk to the front porch. The building is a single story, wood frame, rectangular plan, hipped cottage with a small, offset, gabled dormer and a wide, projecting, enclosed front porch. The hip roof covering the rectangular, main massed plan is relatively low-pitched with overhanging, boxed eaves. The home possesses many of the characteristics of a Classic Cottage, such as the hipped roof, front dormer, and porch, but as with many vernacular homes, features elements of multiple styles. The Classic Cottage was one of the more popular vernacular styles during the construction of the home. 10 The front gabled dormer is placed on the left (north) side of the façade and embellished with ornate, delicate scroll-sawn and beaded bargeboard trim reminiscent of Gothic Revival ornamentation. Inside the gable is a small, infilled, single light attic window, surrounded by imbricated fish-scale shingles. The enclosed porch spans the majority of the façade. The porch entry features a glazed 8-light over 1 panel wooden door (original), flanked by grouped 3-over-1 sash windows. Pairs of 3-over-1 sash windows fenestrate the narrow sides of the front porch. The side elevations are fenestrated with single and tandem sets of narrow double-hung 1-over-1 light windows framed by flat wooden surrounds with stepped molding lintels and sills. Attached to east elevation is a nearly full-width enclosed and glazed rear porch covered by a half-hipped roof. On the south side of the rear is a four panel door and in the middle of the east elevation is a twelve light door. Between the two doors is a pair of 2-over-2 light windows. On the north side of the rear porch is a pair of modern, glass and vinyl sliding doors. The home contains a solitary concrete-coated brick interior chimney that rises from the ridge line of the hip roof, offset towards the rear of the structure. 10 The Fort Collins History Connection website states, “The Classic Cottage was one of the most commonly erected styles in Fort Collins during the early twentieth century and was common in middle and working class neighborhoods throughout the city.” 2.b Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: 404 Whedbee (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) Revised 08-2014 Page 7 REFERENCE LIST or SOURCES of INFORMATION (attach a separate sheet if needed) City of Fort Collins city directories, 1902–1989, City of Fort Collins, Historic Preservation Department, Fort Collins, Colorado. City of Fort Collins building permits, 1927-2003, City of Fort Collins, Historic Preservation Department, Fort Collins, Colorado. Fort Collins Public Library, Local History Archive (online). History Connection, Fort Collins History and Architecture. “Sugar Beets, Streetcar Suburbs, and the City Beautiful, 1900- 1919.” http://history.fcgov.com/archive/contexts/sugar.php. Larimer County Tax Assessor Records. Marmor, Jason. City of Fort Collins Architectural Property Reconnaissance Survey Form, Eastside Neighborhood Survey Project, 404 Whedbee Street, 1998, City of Fort Collins, Historic Preservation Department, Fort Collins, Colorado. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, 1906-1948. 2.b Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: 404 Whedbee (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) Revised 08-2014 Page 8 AGREEMENT The undersigned owner(s) hereby agrees that the property described herein be considered for local historic landmark designation, pursuant to the Fort Collins Landmark Preservation Ordinance, Chapter 14 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins. I understand that upon designation, I or my successors will be requested to notify the Secretary of the Landmark Preservation Commission at the City of Fort Collins prior to the occurrence of any of the following: Preparation of plans for reconstruction or alteration of the exterior of the improvements on the property, or; Preparation of plans for construction of, addition to, or demolition of improvements on the property DATED this __________________ day of _______________________________, 201___. _____________________________________________________ Owner Name (please print) _____________________________________________________ Owner Signature State of ___________________________) )ss. County of __________________________) Subscribed and sworn before me this _________ day of ___________________, 201____, by _____________________________________________________________________. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires _________________________. _____________________________________________________ Notary 2.b Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 404 Whedbee (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) 404 Whedbee Southwest Elevation 404 Whedbee West Elevation 2.c Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 404 Whedbee Elevations (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) 404 Whedbee Northwest Elevation 404 Whedbee North Elevation 2.c Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 404 Whedbee Elevations (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) 404 Whedbee East Elevation 404 Whedbee South Elevation 2.c Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 404 Whedbee Elevations (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) 404 Whedbee South Elevation 2.c Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 404 Whedbee Elevations (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) 404 Whedbee Southwest Elevation 404 Whedbee West Elevation and Context 2.c Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 404 Whedbee Elevations (3135 : Fort Collins Landmark Designation of the Michaud House at 404 Whedbee Street) Agenda Item 3 Item # 3 Page 1 STAFF REPORT May 13, 2015 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME 215 MATHEWS STREET OFFICE BUILDING: REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for a Preliminary Design Review for a proposed 3 story, 9,060 square foot office building with the ground level serving primarily as covered parking. The existing 1,054 square foot single family home and small shed on the 7,000 square foot lot have been determined to not be individually eligible for Landmark designation, and would be demolished. The property is located in the N-C-B, Neighborhood Conservation, Buffer District zone. APPLICANT: Greg Fisher, Greg D. Fisher Architect OWNER: Brad Oldemeyer RECOMMENDATION: N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A three story office building of approximately 9,000 sf is proposed on a 7,000 sf infill site immediately across Mathews Street from the Fort Collins Community Creative Center (former Museum). The existing zoning for the site is NCB and professional office use is a permitted use subject to Planning and Zoning Board review. Approximately 3,000 sf of the facility will be occupied by Cline Williams Wright Johnson & Oldfather, L.L.P. Attorneys at Law. The remainder of the space will be for speculative office space. The site is a small urban infill lot. One concern that the applicant would like to see addressed by the Commission is the contextual setback. The current proposal is for a setback along Mathews reflective of the soon-to-be-built Townhomes at Library Park project. In its Project Development Review (PDR) comments, staff has suggested that a more appropriate setback would be one more consistent with the historic apartment buildings. ATTACHMENTS 1. Narrative (PDF) 2. Site Context Plan (PDF) 3. Preliminary Elevations (PDF) 4. Context Photos (PDF) 5. REVISED Presentation (PDF) 3 Packet Pg. 27 3115 CLYDE ST. FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524 | 970.484.8433 | www.gregdfisherarchitect.com March 31, 2015 215 MATHEWS STREET Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Narrative Proposed Project / Use: A siteinfill three immediately story office across building Mathews of approximately Street from 9,the 000 Fort sf Collins is proposed Community on a 7,Creative 000 sf Center. permitted The use existing subject zoning to Planning for the and site Zoning is NCB Board and professional review. Redevelopment office use is a of this property the currently will add unsightly much and needed dilapidated quality office existing space home. to Approximately the Old Town area 3,000 and sf of clean the up facility at Law. will The be remainder occupied of by the Cline space Williams will be Wright for speculative Johnson & office Oldfather, space. L.L.P. Attorneys Existing Improvements: The with existing typical related site contains yard improvements. a non-distinct The single-site family currently residence has access and small to Mathews shed along Street via a curbcut and drive as well as from the alley on the west side of the site. Site Circulation: Circulation conditions although for the proposed the intensity site will will largely be increased work in from the same a single fashion family as residence the existing to an office continue facility. in the Vehicular form of a access one-way from driveway Mathews serving Street a and small the parking alley are area proposed of 9 spaces. to The space proposed per 1,000 parking sf of gross to be building provided area satisfies and thus the zoning neighborhood requirement parking of one should parking only be the minimally form of a impacted. north/south Pedestrian walkway and access pedestrian along the access east side to the of building the site will will be continue taken in from this walkway in the form of a small plaza. Site Design, Architecture and Surroundings Compatibility: The dense site and is a intense small urban of a use infill than lot with the immediate the current surrounding single-family properties. home being The much proposed less site context. design The increases architecture the attempts density and to sensitively intensity to respond respond to to the the historic present nature more urban of the Creative less descript Center building (former to the museum)north , and the yet more still traditional be a reflection building of the to the current south time. and In the reviewing proposed design the surrounding attempts context, to echo. there First and are a foremost series of is unifying the predominant elements, use which of the 3.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Narrative (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215 Mathews Street Preliminary Design Review Narrative 3/31/15 Page 2 3115 CLYDE ST. | FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524 | 970.484.8433 | www.gregdfisherarchitect.com masonry. in the neighborhood While the specific and will type continue of masonry with the varies proposed greatly, building. the general Second, use building is rampant scale buildings is fairly and uniform, even a four-with story there building mostly being currently a mix being of two-proposed story and for three-the Library story Park Townhomes consistent with at surrounding the south end context of the than block. is The the current three-story single-building story single-proposed family is more home. Next, historical while context. not all The do, most proposed edifices project make continues use of pitched this theme roofs with in keeping the appearance with the of the roof project, will be a from roof street well to level, conceal being roof entirely top mechanical of a pitched units. roof. Residential Hidden within style that and pitched scale fenestration project continues seems that to thread be another with common the vast majority architectural of the thread windows in the with vicinity. there being This a few echo accents the masonry of storefront arches type used glazing on both at the the Community entry areas. Center Lastly, (former this building museum) seeks and to the over building the main to entry. the south. Not in a literal way but with a subtle nod taking form in arches Stormwater Detention: Stormwater impervious area detention and the is not lack planned of storm for sewer on this adjacent site due to to the the site. small We increase understand in that detention increase in for impervious sites in the area Old over Town 5,Drainage 000 square Basin feet is (sf)only . The required existing when impervious there is area an is sf. estimated The proposed to be site 2,024 is sf projected and the to proposed only increase impervious the impervious area is projected area by to be 5,530 approximately 3,404 sf. Drainage: It drains appears east that to Mathews a portion Street. of the site The drains exact west percentage to the alley that and drains a portion each direction of the site is not known Mathews at Street, this time. but It it is is expected unknown that how the much proposed it will change site will from drain the to existing both the condition. alley and This downspouts will be largely on the dependent proposed building. on existing Due grades to the and size the of locations this proposed of gutters development, and it is impactan expected onsite that or the offsite. increase The roof in quantity drains of and stormwater downspouts runoff will will likely not concentrate have much the of flows direct to the specific flows to locations, the Mathews which Street may require flowline. sidewalk chases and curb channels to Run-off Treatment: It provided is understood in the extended that this site detention drains pond. to the Udall However, Natural it is area also where understood water that quality Low is Impact runoff to Development be treated on (LID) site requirements by filtration or are infiltration in place methods. now that require There is the not stormwater storm sewer adjacent infiltration. to The this site project and geotechnical it is not currently engineer know will if the perform existing tests soils to check are conducive the infiltration to 3.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Narrative (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215 Mathews Street Preliminary Design Review Narrative 3/31/15 Page 3 3115 CLYDE ST. | FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524 | 970.484.8433 | www.gregdfisherarchitect.com capabilities ground filtration of the options existing (such soils. as If a the raised soils planter are not bed) conducive that would to infiltration, capture stormwater above from looked the into. roof If and soils filter are it conducive before it released to infiltration above and the the grade geotechnical of the street engineer would be approves since there it is pervious no adjacent pavers storm or bioretention sewer. Other without LID solutions an underdrain / suggestions may be pursued from City staff that may be suitable for this development would be welcomed. Natural Features Impact: There removed. are It numerous is anticipated existing that trees most located of these on trees the current are Siberian site that Elm will and need are to be undesirable. the conditions However, and respond it would accordingly. be our intent to meet with the City arborist and review Fire Protection Systems: The NFPA existing 13 sprinkler structure system. will be razed. The proposed structure will be sprinkled with a Unusual Factors: The transitional NCB zone district district, between the subject more intense property downtown is located commercial within, is intended uses and as the a surrounding fall on edge of single-the Downtown family residential District neighborhoods. and in many ways The the subject subject property block more happens closely to resembles surrounding the single-character family and neighborhoods. intensity of the The Downtown existing single-District family more home so than is the the last remaining dense multi-on family the block residences face and with is an sandwiched approved between even more two intense much more attached-intense dwelling and project, The existing the Townhomes adjacent buildings, at Library and Park, certainly on the the way approved further south Townhome on the project, block. exceed many manner of given the zone the district proximity standards to downtown but do and so the in what lack seems of immediate to be an proximity appropriate to single- family modifications homes. of In standards this same to fashion allow it the to subject come into property compatible will require character, several scale, density and section intensity below with for more the adjacent specifics properties. on the Modifications Please refer of to Standards the “Specific required. Questions” Previous Applications: There Planning has department been no previous to determine applications if the existing with the building exception is eligible of one for to the designation Preservation as a landmark. see the attached A response email was correspondence received indicating between that Josh the building Weinberg was of not Preservation eligible. Please Planning and the property owners. 3.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Narrative (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215 Mathews Street Preliminary Design Review Narrative 3/31/15 Page 4 3115 CLYDE ST. | FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524 | 970.484.8433 | www.gregdfisherarchitect.com Specific Questions: As project stated that above, will allow several it to Modifications come into compatible of Standards character, will be scale, required density for the and proposed intensity with approval the adjacent of these properties. modifications While through it is acknowledged the PDR process that it staff is requested cannot grant that staff an provide suggestions a preliminary for solving opinion the issues. as to the Further, appropriateness it is not intended of the that requests the following or offer other information defended herein. is an actual The following modification list generally request nor outlines are the the issues anticipated adequately Modification explained of or Standards: 1. Section more parking 3.2.2(spaces J): Setbacks or one (parking)thousand . Any eight vehicular hundred use (1,800) area or containing more square six (6) feet or shall be set back from the side and rear yard lot line five (5) feet. Outline/south, east Arguments: and west Parking sides of setbacks the parking proposed area. However, exceed the the required proposed on north the setback to placing is the 3’-4” building in lieu of face the at 5’ the required. building The setback south and side then exceeds providing the setback room to due accommodate drive aisle. The the north structural side is columns below standard to support in order the floors to accommodate above before the placing a required modification drive would aisle be width to modify and parking the drive stall aisle depth. width An required alternative by to the this parking stall dimensions to provide any indicated modestly in section efficient 3.form 2.2(L)of . parking In either for event such a a modification narrow lot (is 50’)needed . A vine extend trellis the structure “green” feel is proposed of the setback along beyond all of the 5’ parking and thus areas it would which be would argued that this solution is equal to or better than the standard. 2. area Section of the 4.9(building(D)(1): Density. s), but not Minimum less than lot five area thousand shall be equivalent (5,000) square to the feet. total floor Outline/floor area Arguments: would be 9,The 000 lot square area feet. is 7,000 This square is a 28% feet. increase The proposed beyond maximum the standard. be argued The that adjacent the proposed properties solution exceed is minimal this criteria and inconsequential significantly more. given It would the surrounding context. 3. area Section on the 4.9(rear D)(5)half : Allowable of a lot shall Floor not Area exceed on Rear thirty-Half three of Lots. (33) percent The allowable of the area floor of the rear fifty (50) percent of the lot. Outline/feet based Arguments: on a real lot The area allowable of 3,500 rear square building feet. area The would proposed be 1,floor 155 square area would be properties approximately exceed 3,this 236 criteria square significantly feet. While as this well. is a It sizable would be increase, argued the that adjacent the proposed solution is minimal and inconsequential given the surrounding context. 3.a Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Narrative (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215 Mathews Street Preliminary Design Review Narrative 3/31/15 Page 5 3115 CLYDE ST. | FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524 | 970.484.8433 | www.gregdfisherarchitect.com 4. Section 4.9(D)(6)(b): Minimum front yard setback shall be fifteen (15) feet. Outline/front property Arguments: line for The the width building of two as proposed brick columns would at not the be main setback entry, from this the would be 2’. And for a another total width 7’ – of 8” 4’ width – 8”. of Another building 15’ would of the be building setback width 5’. The would remaining be setback 12’- 10” site of context façade diagram width would provided be the with opening the drawing to the package. parking area. It delineates Please the refer to the setbacks and south for of the the other subject properties property on are the setback block front. 12’ and The the buildings Townhomes to the at north Library Park two buildings. project further With the to the four south properties has a virtual a nice zero undulation setback pattern for the of full facades width of is the developing solution is minimal in a mild and in and inconsequential out fashion. given It would the be surrounding argued that context. the proposed 5. Section anyWhenever portion 4.9(of D)a (6)wall (d): or Minimum building side exceeds yard eighteen setback shall (18) feet be five in height, (5) feet. such portion additional of the one wall (1) foot, or building beyond shall the be minimum set back required, from the for interior each two side (2) lot feet line or an fraction height. thereof of wall or building height that exceeds eighteen (18) feet in Outline/complies Arguments: with the first This component standard of has providing two components. a 5’ building The setback. proposed The project second component more consistent requires with the residential building uses. to be None stepped of the back adjacent in a fashion projects that comply would be with this more standard like the Downtown as, like stated District previously, in this regard. the general The proposed character building of this block rises is to three a varying stories setback or approximately which helps 37’. provide It should further be buffer. noted And, that the it should project also to south be noted has that It would the project be argued façade that to the the proposed north contains solution no is windows minimal and that inconsequential would be impacted. given the surrounding context. 6. Section off-street 4.parking 9(E)(6): area Access: located Whenever on such a lot lot must has frontage obtain access along from an alley, such any new adjoining when a new alley; detached provided, garage however, is proposed that such to alley be accessed access shall from not an existing be required driveway determined that by has the a City curbcut Engineer along to a be public a hazard street, to or persons when alley or vehicles. access is Outline/Street curbcut Arguments: from the The north project portion proposes of the relocating frontage to the the existing south portion Mathews and utilizing parking and this curbcut continuing to connect on to the to alley. a one-This way solution drive serving largely the maintains under-building current traffic Mathews flows Street and or actually the alley. eliminates Furthermore, the need the for one-a vehicle way drive to back allows into for either 2’ less of overall 24’ drive width plus for 17’ the parking drive stalls and parking for a two-stalls way (20’ drive)drive . This plus 2’ 19’ reduction parking is stalls essential vs. 3.a Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Narrative (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215 Mathews Street Preliminary Design Review Narrative 3/31/15 Page 6 3115 CLYDE ST. | FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524 | 970.484.8433 | www.gregdfisherarchitect.com to proposed adequately solution and is efficiently minimal fit and parking inconsequential on the site. given It would the be existing argued conditions. that the It could the elimination also be argued of backing that the movements proposed into solution Mathews is better Street. than the existing due to Further Specific Questions: In questionsfollowing addition are to the also questions requested: regarding Modifications of Standards answers to the 7. A 3.2.20’ 2(wide L). This one-driveway way drive is proposed aisle is provided to be “necked to access down” the parking to 12’ where stalls the per drive section meets the configuration alley and the seems street appropriate and at the given rear stair the one-tower, way between nature of parking the drive spaces. and given Such that a reasonable feedback on turning the acceptability means are of still the provided proposed into layout. the parking stalls. Please provide 8. It the is proposed anticipated project that a but traffic please report confirm. will not be required due to the low intensity of 9. The requirement project as for proposed a 15’ utility will easement require an along engineering Mathews variance Street. Is to this eliminate something the that staff would support? 10. The eliminate project the as 8’utility proposed easement will require along an the engineering alley. Or, the variance easement to reduce could or remain if it wouldstaff was acceptable support? to place the trash enclosure over it. Is this something that 11. Is the 4” waterline in Mathews Street adequate to serve the needs of this site? 12. Where ofdemands the new is the building existing with electrical an elevator? service and is it sufficient to meet the 13. significant The existing improvements alley appears are to not be in anticipated. reasonably Does good staff condition agree and with thus,this assessment? 14. Olive/Are the Mathews positions and of Oak/the existing Mathews fire acceptable hydrants at to the the intersections fire department of to serve this site? 3.a Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Narrative (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 5’ typ. Existing R.O.W. Existing Property Line Existing Access from Mathews st. 5’ 12’ 12’ 1’+ 5’ typ. Library Park Existing Multi-Family Existing Multi-Family 215 Mathews St. (Project Site) Townhomes at Library Park E. Olive Street E. Oak Street Mathews Street Alley R.O.W . Remington Street 141 s. college ave, suite 104 fort collins, co, 80524 215 Mathews St. p: 970.484.8855 www.russellmillsstudios.com russell+mills studios Site Context 3.b Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Site Context Plan (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215rchitect M athews Sreet G reg D. F isher | A Fort Collins | Colorado March 31, 2015 3.c Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Preliminary Elevations (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215rchitect M athews Sreet G reg D. F isher | A Fort Collins | Colorado March 31, 2015 3.c Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Preliminary Elevations (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) Lobby Eq./R. One Way 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 up Trash/Rec. up Matthews Street Alley 9 7' - 8" 12' - 0" 8' - 0" 19' - 0" 3' - 4" vine trellis system as fencing - typical wrought -gates typical iron porous pedestrianat paving routes - typical dashed ofperimeter building line above indicates - typical raised roof water planter - typical beds to catch Elev. 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado March 31, 2015 North Preliminary 3/32" = 1'-0" 1st Level Floor Plan Area (Gross Building) 1st Level - Lobby 465 SF 1st Level - Rear Stair 216 SF 2nd Level - Office 4317 SF 3rd Level - Office 4063 SF Grand total 9060 SF 3.c Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Preliminary Elevations (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) Elev. 3543 SF Office Area dn. up up dn. Greg D. Fisher | Architect 215 Mathews S reet Fort Collins | Colorado March 31, 2015 North Area (Gross Building) 1st Level - Lobby 465 SF 1st Level - Rear Stair 216 SF 2nd Level - Office 4317 SF 3rd Level - Office 4063 SF Grand total 9060 SF Preliminary 3/32" = 1'-0" 2nd Level Floor Plan 3.c Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Preliminary Elevations (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 3367 SF Office Area dn. dn. Terrace Elev. 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado March 31, 2015 Prelminary 3/32" = 1'-0" 3rd Level Floor Plan Area (Gross Building) 1st Level - Lobby 465 SF 1st Level - Rear Stair 216 SF 2nd Level - Office 4317 SF 3rd Level - Office 4063 SF Grand total 9060 SF 3.c Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Preliminary Elevations (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado March 31, 2015 Preliminary 1/8" = 1'-0" West Elevation Preliminary 1/8" = 1'-0" East Elevation 3.c Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Preliminary Elevations (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado March 31, 2015 Preliminary 1/8" = 1'-0" South Elevation 3.c Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Preliminary Elevations (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado March 31, 2015 Preliminary 1/8" = 1'-0" North Elevation 3.c Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Preliminary Elevations (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado April 15, 2015 (The Building Park View to the Apartments) South (Existing Project Residence) Site (Library Building Park to Apartments) the North (Community Building Creative to the East Center) (Townhomes Buildings further @ Library South Park) CONTEXT PHOTOS 3.d Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Context Photos (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 5’ typ. Existing R.O.W. Existing Property Line Existing Access from Mathews st. 5’ 12’ 12’ 1’+ 5’ typ. Library Park Existing Multi-Family Existing Multi-Family 215 Mathews St. (Project Site) Townhomes at Library Park E. Olive Street E. Oak Street Mathews Street Alley R.O.W . Remington Street 141 s. college ave, suite 104 fort collins, co, 80524 215 Mathews St. p: 970.484.8855 www.russellmillsstudios.com russell+mills studios Site Context 3.e Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 (The Building Park View to the Apartments) South (Existing Project Residence) Site (Library Building Park to Apartments) the North (Community Building Creative to the East Center) (Townhomes Buildings further @ Library South Park) CONTEXT PHOTOS 3.e Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) Lobby 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Equip. up Trash/Rec. up Matthews Street Alley 9 vine trellis system as fencing - typical wrought iron gate porous pedestrianat paving routes - typical dashed ofperimeter building line above indicates - typical raised roof water planter - typical beds to catch Elev. Fire/Elec. T. elec. gear gas meter bikes bikes PARKVIEW APARTMENTS LIBRARY PARK APARTMENTS GARAGE 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 North Preliminary 3/32" = 1'-0" 1st Level Floor Plan Area (Gross Building) 1st Level - Lobby 465 SF 1st Level - Rear Stair 216 SF 2nd Level - Office 4317 SF 3rd Level - Office 4054 SF Grand total 9052 SF 3.e Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) Elev. 3384 SF Office Area dn. up up dn. Common Misc. PARKVIEW APARTMENTS LIBRARY PARK APARTMENTS 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 North Area (Gross Building) 1st Level - Lobby 465 SF 1st Level - Rear Stair 216 SF 2nd Level - Office 4317 SF 3rd Level - Office 4054 SF Grand total 9052 SF Preliminary 3/32" = 1'-0" 2nd Level Floor Plan 3.e Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 3208 SF Office Area dn. dn. Terrace Elev. Common Misc. PARKVIEW APARTMENTS up 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 Prelminary 3/32" = 1'-0" 3rd Level Floor Plan Area (Gross Building) 1st Level - Lobby 465 SF 1st Level - Rear Stair 216 SF 2nd Level - Office 4317 SF 3rd Level - Office 4054 SF Grand total 9052 SF 3.e Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 North Preliminary 3/32" = 1'-0" Roof Plan 3.e Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 3.e Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 3.e Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 Mathews 1" = 20'-0" Street Partial Block Face Elevation Mathews Street Aerial 3.e Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 Preliminary 1/8" = 1'-0" East Elevation 3.e Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 Preliminary 1/8" = 1'-0" South Elevation 3.e Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 Preliminary 1/8" = 1'-0" North Elevation 3.e Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 Preliminary 1/8" = 1'-0" West Elevation 3.e Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 3.e Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 3.e Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal) 215Architect Mathews S reet Greg D. Fisher | Fort Collins | Colorado May 12, 2015 3.e Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: REVISED Presentation (3130 : 215 Mathews Street Office Building: Review of Development Proposal)