HomeMy WebLinkAboutEconomic Advisory Commission - Minutes - 04/18/20121
Minutes
City of Fort Collins
Economic Advisory Commission
Regular Meeting
300 LaPorte Ave
City Hall
April 18, 2012
11:00 a.m. – 1:30 p.m.
For Reference:
Bill Timpson, Chair 493-3673
Council Liaison Wade Troxell
Josh Birks, Staff Liaison 416-6324
Wendy Bricher, Minutes 221-6506
Commission members present: Commission members absent:
Blue Hovatter Stu MacMillan
Christophe Febvre Rick Price
Michael Kulisheck
Bill Timpson
Channing Arndt
Jim Clark
Sam Solt
Guests:
Ann Hutchison, FC Chamber of Commerce
Dale Adamy
Michael Pruznick
Joann Ginal, House District II Candidate
Deb Moeck, SBDC
Staff Present:
Wendy Bricher, Minutes
Josh Birks, Economic Health Director
Lawrence Pollack, Budget and Performance Measurement Manager
Agenda Item 1: Meeting called to order
Meeting called to order at 11:04 a.m.
Agenda Item 2: Approval of Minutes
Unanimous approval of minutes dated 3/21/12
Agenda Item 3: Public Comment
Mike Pruznick provided additional feedback regarding the Economic Strategic Plan. He still believes that
more public outreach is needed for the plan and indicated the outreach list on pages 109-112 explain why
the plan is so heavily focused on business. He suggested a link to City Plan and that social media needs
to be reflected. He also suggested the page 27 was not clear, and he stated “it doesn’t use common
verbiage”.
Financial Services
300 LaPorte Ave
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6505
970.224.6107 - fax
fcgov.com
2
Joann Ginal stated that she supports the Advisory Boards City wide. Mayor Weitkunat commented that
political campaigning at Boards and Commissions meetings was not appropriate and Ms. Ginal agreed.
Agenda Item 4: Follow-up Discussion Regarding Previous Meetings
Follow-up discussion included the Economic Health Strategic Plan. The Plan is scheduled for the June 1
worksession; TIP will continue to make changes based on continued feedback.
Sam Solt asked if the Economic Health Office will report back to City Council as plan milestones are
reached? Josh Birks indicated the EHO will provide semi-annual updates on all activities. Sam also
asked if EAC can work on more detailed items within the plan. Josh indicated that that direction lies with
Council and upper management. EAC has a role of “watch dog” for the plan and a member will likely act
as a liaison to the planned implementation group.
Christophe Febvre was confused about the role of the plan and stated that he had some level of
disappointment in the creativity of the plan and how it addresses things so broadly; however, he found
there was a lot of valuable information in the plan. He felt the plan had a predominant focus on the single
aspect of job growth as compared to a broader systems-level economic focus. He also stated that if the
plan title and executive summary indicated that it is a jobs plan, it could have avoided his confusion and
he would have been more readily satisfied with much of the content. Josh Birks indicated that the role of
the Strategic Plan was an extension or refinement of the economic section of Plan Fort Collins.
Bill Timpson commented that we should be concerned with the larger interdependent systems as well
including childcare, affordable housing, and corridors. Josh commented that the plan does not state some
of the obvious, but focuses on what we need to improve. Bill suggested that the plan should state the
obvious as it is intended for future generations, and successors many not know what the obvious is.
Mike Kulisheck read the plan in a more narrower sense and believes it is important to remember the
connections with what is special about Fort Collins, but it is also importation to recognize the outside
influences. He believes we don’t always need to reinvent the wheel if it is spinning smoothly.
Jim Clark agreed and stated that it is important to realize that we work and compete in a state, national
and global context. He believes communication should be improved by building of networks more
formally.
Channing Arndt agreed with Christophe and stated that the plan title should be more clear as to what we
are focusing on. It would be better with a clearer statement of delineations. He also stated that the plan
mentions nothing of the fact that we are primarily depending on sales tax revenues as our source of
revenue. A timeline also needs to be established.
Blue Hovatter commented that it helps to have solidified community goals written down. The Plan needs
more descriptors of its purpose to serve.
All EAC members agreed that this is a living document and should be reviewed and updated on a regular
basis. If the plan is focus is “too high up”, it will get put on a shelf. Actionable items are important and
choosing the issues and making them clear is a priority. The Triple Bottom Line is important and should
play a role with measureable results. Mayor Weitkunat commented that the plan should capture the
community and Council direction moving forward as well.
Agenda Item 5: Member Updates/Future Agenda Items Discussion
No member updates.
3
Agenda Item 6: KFCG Funding Report
Lawrence Pollack presented information regarding the 2011 Keep Fort Collins Great (KFCG) report.
Information included revenue allocations, revenues vs. expenses, appropriations, and personnel hire
adjustments. In addition, information was provided regarding fund balance, transfer rules, cost savings
and efficiencies, and a short highlight list of impacts and projects. A copy of the power point presentation
will be provided to the EAC.
Agenda Item 7: Economic Research – Dr. Henrique Barreto
Dr. Henrique Barreto presented information on his study New Business formation in Northern Colorado –
a time-series cross-sectional analysis. Be believes his study is important in that we need to know what
makes our community click, the make up, the barriers, etc. His work is a combination of psychology,
economics and business. He studied 11 variables (hand-out) that focused on different sectors within Fort
Collins and suggested that better data collection is needed to fine tune studies and recommendations for
community needs.
Agenda Item 8: Project Beta
Postponed until May.
Agenda Item 9: Economic Health BFO Offers
Josh Birks presented information on the proposed Economic Health Office (EHO) Budgeting for
Outcomes (BFO) offers for 2013 and 2014. After discussion, the EAC agreed to review the enhancement
offers in more detail and provide their feedback and rankings to Josh prior to May 4, 2012.
Meeting adjourned at 1:30p.m.
The next meeting is scheduled on May 16, 2012 from 11:00 a.m. – 1:30 p.m.
CIC Room, City Hall