HomeMy WebLinkAboutLandmark Preservation Commission - Minutes - 12/11/2002s a
LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
December 11, 2002 Minutes
Council Liaison: Eric Hamrick (225-2343)
Staff Liaison: Joe Frank (221-6376)
Commission Chairperson: Per Hogestad (416-7285)
Summary: The LPC recommended the designation of the Giddings Machine Shop at 401 Pine St. An
awning was approved for O'Hair's at #7 Old Town Square. Planters connected by railings rather than
permanent railings were approved for the front porch of the Gill/Nelson Farm House at 5529 S.
Timberline Road. Angie Aguilera and Jeff Benham of Edge Architecture, and Dick Anderson of
Anderson Associates were approved as Design Assistance Program Pre -Qualified Consultants. Bud Frick
was elected LPC Chairperson, and Angie Aguilera was elected Vice -Chairperson. A furnace exhaust
solution for 328 Remington St., the First Baptist Church, was referred to staff for administrative review.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Meeting called to order by Chairman Per
Hogestad at 5:38 at 281 N. College Avenue. Commission members Angie Aguilera,
Agnes Dix, W.J. "Bud" Frick, Per Hogestad, Janet Ore, Carole Stansfield, and Myrne
Watrous were present. Carol Tunner, Karen McWilliams, and Joe Frank represented
staff.
GUESTS: Jon Prouty, President, Daemian Enterprises for 401 Pine St.; Casey Dean,
Boy Scout, and his parents for 5529 S. Timberline Road; Jeff Benham of Edge
Architecture and Dick Anderson, Anderson Associates for the Design Assistance
Program item.
AGENDA REVIEW: Ms. Tunner added a discussion of the furnace exhaust for 328
Remington Street.
STAFF REPORTS: Ms. McWilliams announced that the Armory building on E.
Mountain had been entered in the National Register of Historic Places. She said that
the proposed historic preservation code changes would go to City Council on December
16. She also announced that Adam Thomas had been selected as the consultant to do
the work on the Quonset Hut Survey and Context. Ms. Tunner urged the Commission
to sign up for the CPI conference in early February 2003.
APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 11, SEPTEMBER 25, AND OCTOBER 23, 2002
MINUTES: These minutes were approved as written and passed by affirmation.
COMMISSION MEMBERS' REPORTS: Ms. Watrous attended the last DDA meeting.
She spoke about the city's street and sidewalk reconstruction program this summer.
She described the brick and sandstone remodel at 221-223 N. College Avenue. She
said that the owner of 100 W. Mountain Avenue has asked the DDA for $58,000 in
funding for window restoration because the LPC had required them to repair the
` Landmark Preservation Commissiop
December 11, 2002 Meeting Minutes
Page 2
windows and use exterior storms rather than replacing the windows. Mr. Frick said that
exterior storms will obliterate the look of the building and the LPC had preferred interior
storms. Ms Watrous stated that a six -story building is being proposed for Canyon and
Oak, designed by Vaught/Frye.
At this point (6:00 p.m.), Mr. Frick received an emergency call, and had to leave.
Ms. Aguilera took over as chairman of the meeting.
DESIGNATION:
401 Pine Street, the Giddings Machine Shop Building
Ms. McWilliams described the building as meeting the standards for designation for its
association with significant persons, for both the business' and building's contributions
to our history, as well as the building's representation of a type, period or method of
construction. It is also eligible for National Register designation under Criteria A, B, and
C, and would contribute to the Historic Old Town District. It is associated with the
Giddings family, who played an integral part in the growth and development of Fort
Collins; and with the Giddings Machine Company, today internationally known for its
quality soil exploration equipment. Finally, it is important for its Factory -type commercial
architecture of the 19th and 20th centuries. Staff recommendation is to approve this
request for individual landmark designation.
Discussion centered on the non -historic additions to the building, including the steel
frame addition to the north, built in 1988, and the concrete block addition to the west,
constructed in 1975. Mr. Hogestad asked if the Commission was clear that these
pieces were non-contributing to the historic character of the building. Ms. Ore asked
what if 50 years goes by and the non-contributing additions become contributing? Mr.
Frank said that they could amend the designation in the future.
Ms. Ore made a motion that the Commission recommends to City Council that the
Giddings Building at 401 Pine Street be designated an individual local landmark.
Ms. Watrous seconded the motion, which passed 6-0.
CURRENT REVIEW:
1) #7 Old Town Square, O'Hair's — Addition of New Awning, Final Review (Rich
Gilsdorf, Gilsdorf Canvas and Awning)
The applicant was not present, so Ms. Tunner presented the proposed awning. The
O'Hair's business at #7 Old Town Square would like have a retractable arm awning with
open ends and loose valance installed at #7 Old Town Square. Pressure sensitive
letters "O'Hair's" that are 7 feet wide and 2 foot 9 inches tall would be placed on a
sewed -on vinyl patch in the center of the awning. The awning fabric would be Dickson
acrylic in Baden Baden (7504) pattern, which are sand colors. The graphics are sand
color. The frame and hood of the awning would be sand color like the body brick of the
building. The awning would be mounted to the brick soldier course top and ends above
the window. Ms. Tunner recommended the awning be approved with the condition that
all anchors be placed in the mortar joints of the brick.
Landmark Preservation Commissio* •
December 11, 2002 Meeting Minutes
Page 3
Ms. Aguilera asked if there was any public input. There was none.
Ms. Aguilera made a motion to approve the awning at #7 Old Town Square for
O'Hair's business with the condition that mounting brackets go into the mortar
joints. Ms. Watrous seconded the motion, motion approved 6-0.
2) 5529 S. Timberline Road, the Gill -Nelson Farmhouse — Front Porch Railing for
Conceptual/Final Review (Dean Casey, Boy Scout)
Mr. Casey described how he was looking to build a railing between the columns of the
front porch of the Gill -Nelson House as an Eagle Scout project. The Court Appointed
Special Advocacy (CASA) agency rents the building and they feel the children rushing
out the front door may fall off the porch which has a 24 inch drop to the ground.
Mr. Casey described two options: 1. To build a railing with top and bottom rail and
vertical balusters, such railing to be attached permanently to the columns of the porch.
His design was for a contemporary railing. 2. Build two flower boxes with two and a
half -foot high horizontal guard rails connecting them. They would be a form of a rail, but
not attached permanently to the porch. Both options would be painted to match the
porch color.
Ms. Watrous said that flower boxes would be preferable to her.
Mr. Hogestad asked Mr. Casey which option he preferred. Mr. Casey said that he
preferred the permanently attached rail. They would be screwed to the columns with
90-degree supports to hold up the horizontal beams.
Ms. Stansfield observed that children would be more likely to climb on option #2.
Ms. Ore commented on Mr. Casey's design of the permanently installed balusters.
They should look more like the photographs submitted of other historic porch railings in
town. The balusters should be mortised in the rail and not extend below the bottom rail.
She said she could vote for either option if the design of the permanently mounted rails
were exactly like the historic rail would have been.
Mr. Hogestad technically described the way an historic rail would have been assembled
and asked Mr. Casey if he had those skills. He nodded no. Mr. Hogestad said that the
current design of the permanent rail is not in character with the building. He supported
the planter concept.
Ms. Aguilera asked for public input and there was none.
Ms. Watrous made a motion that the LPC approve option two, planters with rails
between them that would not be mounted to the porch for 5529
S. Timberline Road. Ms. Dix seconded the motion, which passed 6-0.
Landmark Preservation Commission •
December 11, 2002 Meeting Minutes
Page 4
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
• Design Assistance Program (DAP) Applicants for Inclusion on the Pre -
Qualified List of Consultants:
Angie Aguilera and Jeff Benham
Ms. Tunner introduced that Angie Aguilera and her partner Jeff Benham had started a
new business, Edge Architecture. They want to be included in the city's DAP Pre -
Qualified Consultants List. The Commission has been working all year to
professionalize the manner in which consultants are selected, so the Commission's
questions will become a template that Ms. Tunner can put together for future applicant
interrogations. Ms. Aguilera relinquished the chair to Per Hogestad and stepped
off the Commission for the following discussion of her inclusion on the DAP list.
Mr. Hogestad asked if each of them had worked on any projects where they had to
design changes to historic buildings.
Mr. Benham said that he felt comfortable following the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards. When a client doesn't understand, he tries to explain that they have to
make decisions based on guidelines. It helps if the building owner has already dealt
with this concept. It is necessary to explain to the client beforehand why the Secretary
of the Interior's Standards need to be followed. He feels that part of his job is to help
them to comply.
Ms. Aguilera added that some clients still want to do what they want.
Ms. Stansfield said that she used to work for CSU Facilities and the steps on the south
side of the Plant Sciences Building that Ms. Aguilera worked on were compatibly
designed.
Ms. Watrous mentioned that the as-builts on the Rialto were good. Ms. Aguilera said
that she had produced them.
Mr. Hogestad asked about modern materials. "Do you believe they should be used on
historic properties and why? And what about economics?"
Ms. Aguilera replied that sometimes modern materials can be used but that they should
match as closely as possible.
Ms. Stansfield asked how they would handle an owner who wants to add detail that was
never there.
Ms. Ore said that these applicants are applying for our DAP list which deals with
landmarks, but our discussions with many applicants are not over landmarks. "What
would you do if a clearly historic house was not designated and the owner wished to
Landmark Preservation Commission •
December 11, 2002 Meeting Minutes
Page 5
change it? You don't have the back-up of they must do it right because it is
landmarked?"
Ms. Aguilera replied she would go through all the options to try to direct them in a
historically correct manner. She would show them how they would benefit by doing it
the right way.
Mr. Benham added that for his design ethics he trys to carry himself as a professional.
He would first use common sense, and second he would respect the design that was
already there.
Ms. Aguilera added that it is unfortunate that people are not more educated in pure
architectural styles and periods.
Ms. Dix moved to accept Jeff Benham and Angie Aguilera of Edge Architecture
for the Design Assistance Program Pre -Qualified Consultants list. Ms. Stansfield
seconded the motion, motion passed 5-0.
Ms. Stansfield added that the new consultants should be aware that they could be
removed from the list if the Commission decides they are not following the Secretary's
Standards.
Ms. Aguilera took the reins again to chair the meeting.
Dick Anderson, Anderson Associates
Mr. Anderson described that he had moved to Fort Collins in 1978 and lives and works
in an historic house at 422 E. Oak. He described some of the historic buildings that he
had worked on, including 236 Linden Street.
Ms. Ore asked, "What is your philosophy of additions to historic buildings and how do
you mesh this with historic standards and guidelines?"
Mr. Anderson replied that you should be able to clearly identify an addition.
Ms. Watrous asked about his involvement in the Ryder Residence at 606 W. Mountain.
Mr. Anderson said that there is only so much you can do if the client wants to have it
their way.
Ms. Ore asked, "Do you feel a commitment to old buildings?"
Mr. Hogestad added, "What do you think about contemporary materials?"
Mr. Anderson replied that if it looks, feels, and tastes as one, it should be one.
Landmark Preservation Commission•
December 11, 2002 Meeting Minutes
Page 6
•
Ms. Ore said that one of the big issues for the Commission is windows. She asked, "If
you were asked to make a recommendation on historic windows, would you advocate
taking out the old and putting in new windows?"
Mr. Anderson said that he would advocate new windows if you couldn't tell the
difference in old and new — and the casings and moldings were unchanged.
Ms. Ore countered that historicity is the fabric, the very essence, and one shouldn't
replace it if it is repairable.
Mr. Anderson said that in 236 Linden Street, they kept the old windows — but there is a
need for double pane window glass for a certain comfort level inside.
Mr. Hogestad said that he was disappointed with that answer.
Ms. Stansfield asked, "Should we table this appointment?"
Mr. Hogestad tried to explain to Mr. Anderson that the point is about the material, the
historic fabric itself.
Ms. Ore made a motion to accept Mr. Anderson for the Pre -Qualified Consultants
List of the DAP program. Ms. Dix seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken:
Aguilera -yes, Dix - yes, Hogestad - no, Ore - yes (but disappointed in the window
issue), Stansfield -yes (agree on the window issue), Watrous - no (looked at all
these various projects — some were okay, some I would hesitate as far as
blending into the original house.) Motion passed 4-2.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Election of Officers —
Ms. Aguilera called for nominations for Vice Chairman of the Commission. Mr.
Hogestad nominated Ms. Aguilera for this position. Ms. Ore seconded the
motion. Motion passed 6-0.
Ms. Aguilera called for nominations for Chairman of the Commission. Ms. Stansfield
nominated Bud Frick. Mr. Hogestad said he had spoken with Mr. Frick and he will
accept the nomination. Ms. Ore made a motion to elect Bud Frick Chairman,
seconded by Ms. Stansfield, motion passed 6-0.
Ms. Tunner described a situation where they need to exhaust the new furnace at 328
Remington St. and the previous exhaust chimney on the north side of the original