Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLandmark Preservation Commission - Minutes - 03/22/2000LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Meeting March 22, 2000 Council Liaison: Scott Mason (226 — 4824) Staff Liaison: Joe Frank (221-6376) Commission Chairperson: Per Hogestad (303-292-1875) SUMMARY OF MEETING: The Commission passed a resolution National Guard Armory as a local landmark. The Commission recommending designation of 314 East Mountain Avenue, the 1907 Ft. Collins determined that the Nix Farm is eligible for designation as a local Fort Collins Landmark. The LPC reviewed conceptual plans for the C & S Depot at 136 LaPorte Avenue. The LPC approved changes to the existing windows on a rear addition at 430 West Mountain Avenue. The Commission reviewed the proposed site plan for an addition at 1600 Sheely Drive. The Commission recommended that Bill Stashak be on the list of pre -qualified consultants for the Design Assistance Program. The Commission discussed possible recipients for the Outstanding Historic Renovation and Friend of Preservation awards. The LPC provided comments to the Colorado Historical Society on the pending National Register nominations for 249-261 South College Avenue and 324 East Oak. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Ms. Milewski called the meeting to order at 5:34 p.m., at 281 North College Avenue. Commission members Angie Aguilera, Agnes Dix, Janet Ore, and Rande Pouppirt were present. Bud Frick was absent and Per Hogestad arrived at 5:58 p.m. Carol Tunner and Karen McWilliams represented staff. GUESTS: Vaugh Furniss, Jim Sell Design, and Ian Shuff and Dave Lingle, Aller-Lingle Architects, and Karen Manci, City of Ft. Collins, and Mark Sears, Natural Resources Project Manager, for the Nix Farm project; Jack Gianola, Facilities Project Manager and Mr. Lingle for C & S Depot, 136 LaPorte Avenue, Final Review for Conversion to Intermodal Transportation Center; Bill Stashak, Architect, and Elizabeth Markey and James Kelly for 430 West Mountain Avenue, the Kickland House; Jana Brandes, owner, 1600 Sheely Drive. AGENDA REVIEW: The designation of the Franz -Smith Cabin as a part of the Fort Collins Museum Historic District was withdrawn from the meeting agenda. Ms. Tunner requested that the LPC discuss the feasibility of the installation of window air conditioning units out of second floor windows. Ms. McWilliams added a request for a letter of support from the Commission for Colorado State University's application for a State Historical Fund grant for the grotto and fountain at the Old Power Plant on North College Avenue. STAFF REPORTS: Ms. Tunner announced that the National Trust has a scholarship program for students. Ms. Ore will take the information to her classes. In addition, a letter from Rheba Massey, Local History Coordinator, addressed the scale and mass of Landmark Preservation Commission March 22, 2000 Meeting Minutes Page 3 was moved onto the site around 1915. The other house is a Craftsman style bungalow built circa 1920. The bank barn has a poured concrete floor and a pristine upper floor. At some point, stalls were installed at the lower level for a dairy operation. Ms. McWilliams reported that the house was wood frame and stucco and that early on the porch had been enclosed. The Natural Resources Department would like to locate their offices at the site and preserve the buildings. The smaller house would be used for a police dog training facility and the larger residence would house ranger and educational offices. The barn would be used for storage and an indoor workspace. Staff recommended that the LPC find the barn eligible as a local landmark. Per Hogestad arrived 5:58 p.m. Ms. Tunner explained how the land was built up to front of the the barn to create a bank. Ms. McWilliams believed that the barn had been built around 1920. Ms. Milewski asked if there was any public input and there was none. Ms. Ore moved that the Nix Farm be determined eligible for Local Landmark designation for its architectural significance. Ms. Dix seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. (6-0) The design consultant, Vaughn Furniss, gave a presentation on the National Resource Department's proposed plans for the site. Mr. Furniss displayed an aerial map of the area and explained that it was zoned commercial. He reviewed the conceptual plans. The large house would be remodeled on the inside to contain offices. There is potential to add -on to the rear of the house in the future. The small house would be used as a K- 9 training facility. The small house needs stabilization work. A private drive would be installed. The site would consolidate maintenance and park ranger staff. A new three - sided shed would be built to store vehicles. The water quality pond will remove sediments from run-off. Mr. Furniss added that the police dog training fields and facilities could be easily removed in the future. The fields also will blend in well with the natural areas. Mr. Sears added that they will maintain the feeling of a farm, and hay will continue to be produced. They plan to continue to irrigate at the nursery and sod farm to cultivate plants and grass for the natural areas that they manage. The Commission discussed the site's location. Mr. Furniss explained that the area is mostly industrial. Ms. Ore stated that they are using a site that is already a farm, instead of building a new site. She added that the site is not a natural area and if the land is restored, then the farm buildings will be the only reminders of the old farmstead. Dave Lingle, architect, explained that they propose clustering the new buildings like on a farmstead. He explained the proposed repairs for the house, which include a new wood shingle roof. The windows will be re -finished and the divided light sashes will be Landmark Preservation Commi� • March 22, 2000 Meeting Minute Page 4 retained. The enclosed porch will serve as a reception area. The aluminum storm windows will be replaced with wood ones. Improvements to the grade will be made for the building to be accessible for the handicapped. The plaster will be repaired and the house will be repainted white with green trim. The smaller house has an addition, but further investigation is necessary to determine if it is original. T1-11 siding exists on that part of the structure. They would like to replace it with historic siding material. The semi -enclosed porch on it is falling apart. In addition, they will repair the original windows. The proposed maintenance structures were discussed. A pre-engineered 5400 square foot structure is proposed to be built. The use of different rooflines helps to break up the scale and massing of the structure. Stone and horizontal siding and a pre -finished metal roof is proposed. They showed pictures of the Colorado State University Agricultural Research Development and Education Center (ARDEC) on 1-25 as an example of a similar site and design. Design features from the farmhouse, such as double hung windows will be used. The same roof is proposed for the barn. The Commission members commented on the design of the new structure. Ms. Milewski said that she would like to see a roofing design that looked more historic. Ms. Ore said that the old barn roof should reflect the character of the old barn, and not the character of the new structures. Mr. Lingle said that they were looking for a roof material that is more durable. Mr. Pouppirt liked the simplicity of the metal roof on the new machine shed, which was apparent at the ARDEC site. He added that the stone on the front is not necessary. Mr. Hogestad said that the scale of the structure made it automotive, not farm like. He recommended a steeper roof pitch. Mr. Lingle said that they did not want the height of the structure to overwhelm the historic buildings. Ms. Milewski said that in the site plan the buildings related to each other well. She commented that the newer buildings are clustered. The LPC discussed the treatment of the private drive. They suggested something that looked more like gravel. Ms. Milewski asked if there was any public comment, and there was none. Mr. Hogestad now acted as Chairperson. v vv w�o11O CI Ms. Milewski declared a conflict of interest, because she is working on the landscape architecture of the site. Ms Tunner reported that James Stratis, Colorado State Historical Society, commented on the plans. He was concerned with the type of brick that they will use on the addition and that the addition would cover up the historic building. He suggested that the connector piece be designed more transparent with more glass. The bay window proposed for the west side is not appropriate for the building. He recommended that the original freight depot doors be saved on the interior. The original lantern will be re -installed on the top. A new doorway will be installed where the little window exists. Mr. Lingle, Architect, explained that he was concerned with using a lot of glass on the addition because of security issues. The plan for the Kiss and Ride was simplified and is more compatible with the building. He Landmark Preservation Commission , March 22, 2000 Meeting Minutes Page 5 added that they are still deciding whether the alley to the east will be maintained. If not, parking can be moved back along Washington's where it is now. He tried to tie in the design of the bike pavilion with the gullwing roof design on the depot. Historic colors will be used and brick pillars with sandstone will tie in with the building. All of the gullwing canopy will be preserved. The connection to the addition will exist on the north end under the gullwing. The usage of the addition does not require many windows. The original east side door will be retained and fixed in place. A new wall will be built across that door on the inside. The north and west sides will have storefront glazing where the old overhead doors are. The dock areas with public access will be covered with rubber coating. A rail will block off access to other areas on the dock. A non - original, new lantern is proposed for the administrative offices with a different design than the original lantern on the freight room. The LPC presented their concerns and suggestions. Public comment, in a letter from Jennifer Carpenter, included concerns about the gullwing and the building being obscured by the addition. Mr. Hogestad commented that the addition is sympathetic to the building, but that the connection can be improved. He also liked the seating canopy at the Kiss and Ride. He suggested that the applicant designate the remaining part of the dock and Mr. Gianola nodded in agreement. Mr. Pouppirt said that the addition south elevation is not as complimentary as it can be and that it looked too heavy with too little windows. He suggested the use of more fenestration. The Commission had concerns about the design and location of the bike lockers. Mr. Gianola said that the City would like to encourage the use of alternative forms of transportation and they would like to keep them accessible. Ms. Dix recommended that they turn the windows on the building addition vertical. Ms. Aguilera agreed that the addition looked too heavy. Ms. Ore was concerned that the tall Kiss and Ride pillars would detract from the historic building. The addition appeared big underneath the gullwing roof. She also would like to see a better transition between the building and the addition. Mr. Hogestad urged the City to create model projects. He liked their response to the garage door bays, which he thought was simple and straightforward. He agreed that the windows should be more vertical. Mr. Hogestad added that the columns would help to call attention to the area. Ms. Ore added that a box bay window for the west elevation would be more appropriate for the time period of the building. 430 West Mountain Avenue Kickland House — Window Changes to Existing Rear Addition (Elizabeth Markey and James Kelly) Bill Stashak, architect, presented the proposed plans for the existing rear addition. The affected windows were probably from the 1970s renovation. One window will be removed and the other will be replaced by a shorter window because of where the new sink will be installed in the interior. A multi -light window will be used that is slightly wider. They are doing an interior remodel to extend the kitchen that also will include a new interior stairwell. Mr. Hogestad asked is there was any public input, and there was none. Landmark Preservation Comm • March 22, 2000 Meeting Minutes Page 6 Ms. Aguilera moved to approve the window changes to the existing rear addition at 430 West Mountain Avenue. Ms. Dix seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. (6-0) 1600 Shealy Drive — Complimentary/Conceptual Alteration to Designated House (Jana Brandis) Ms. Brandes explained that they are planning some home improvements. She presented the site plan. The house does not have a garage and they would like to add one. The original garage was made into a bedroom and windows were added. They also would like to create a courtyard area. A brick wall will be added in the same design as the existing wall feature. Ms. Ore commented that it is a long asymmetrical house and the design is in keeping with the long look of the house. She suggested that they keep the same windows height and use the same materials. The Commission agreed that the weeping mortar should be used on the new addition because is a very important feature of the house. Public input came from Mr. Stashask, who said that the design of the long static front worked. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Design Assistance Program Application of Bill Stashak as a Pre Qualified Consultant Mr. Stashak has viewed the training video. He has worked on historic projects that include a sunroom addition at 1230 West Oak. He is interested in learning more about historic preservation. He has experienced more requests to do additions to existing historic homes. He also was interested in the grant programs that are offered for designated and historic homes. Mr. Pouppirt moved to accept Bill Stashak as a pre -qualified consultant in the Design Assistance program. Ms. Aguilera seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. (6-0) Outstanding Historic Renovation and Friend of Preservation Awards for 1999 — Selection Process Ms. Tunner discussed possible recipients for these awards. The projects included 160- 164 North College Avenue, the addition to St. Joseph's School, 210-218 Walnut Street, and 226 Peterson. Mr. Hogestad added Schrivner's Grocery at 152 W. Mountain. OTHER BUSINESS: Provide Comments to the Colorado Historical Society On Pending National Register Nominations for the Armstrong Hotel 249 — 261 South College and the Mosman House, 324 East Oak Street