Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRetirement Committee - Minutes - 09/08/1993C O R R E C T E D FORT COLLINS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 MEETING MINUTES COUNCIL LIAISON: Ann Azari, Mayor COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: Jerry P. Brown Jackie Davis Dennis Sumner Dave Meyer Alan Krcmarik (Member & Staff Support) OTHERS PRESENT: Mary Crumbaker (Staff Support- Legal Advisor) Sue Wilcox (Staff Support - Secretary) Don Mazanec of William M. Mercer, Inc. the City's actuarial firm. Dave Agee, Staff Committee on Pensions Opal Dick, Purchasing Division Pete Dallow, Administrative Services Janet Meisel, Planning Angelina Powell, ICS CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Dennis Sumner called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. in the 2nd Floor Conference Room of City Hall West on September 8, 1993. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Jerry Brown suggested changing the wording on page 4, Section 5-B, first paragraph, second sentence of the August 19th minutes to read: "...defined contribution plan will take some time and could be a significant expense and therefore should not be undertaken without specific direction and goals." Jerry moved that the minutes be changed as outlined above and approved as corrected. Dave Meyer seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. ITEMS OF NOTE: Dennis noted that Council Liaison Ann Azari could not be at this meeting because of a concurrent meeting, but that Alan Krcmarik and he met with Mayor Azari last week and discussed her views on the work the Committee has undertaken. She is supportive of the Committee's work and encourages the Committee to present new and creative ideas to City Council. Specific points she noted were: Equity between classified and non -classified employees as related to retirement options and timeliness of vesting. Differences in percentage of City contributions are NOT an issue for Mayor Azari, since this will be addressed through total comp. Ann emphasized her desire to offer employees options. She emphasized her support for City employees and desire to encourage systems that promote and encourage low employee turnover. The GERC should think in terms of creative options ---let Council determine if and where limitations exist. She suggested scheduling a work session with Council in the near future to explore options for change. -1- Dennis also noted that some Committee members are feeling frustrated with the desire to allow open discussion involving Plan members who attend the meetings, and the need for the Committee to proceed with the work of the GERP in a timely manner. Dennis suggested that in an effort to reconcile the two needs, the GERC adopt a system similar to City Council, where Plan members' comments will be heard, but limited on time, with no interaction between speakers and Committee members. He suggested that only Committee members and staff support personnel be seated at the table, and extra chairs provided for visitors and Plan members around the table. REVIEW OF DISCUSSION TOPICS: It was agreed to move item 3 to #2, since this item was carried over from the last meeting; and to add as item #3 the new information on the valuation report and the cost of suggested Plan changes. DISCUSSION TOPICS: 1. MEMBER COMMENTS: Angelina Powell stressed the need to address the needs of employees who stay less than 10 years and suggested that any options submitted to City Council be "compartmentalized" with prices attached. Janet Meisel commented that she would like to see the meeting organized so that those items of interest to members come first, otherwise it is difficult to estimate when in a meeting a certain item will be discussed, making it difficult for employees to attend and participate. PURCHASING CONCERNS ON SELECTION OF GERP ACTUARY MAIN POINTS: Dennis explained that Opal Dick (senior buyer), Jim O'Neill, Purchasing Division Head, Alan Krcmarik, and he met to discuss the purchasing process. It has been a number of years since a formal bid process or request for proposal has been undertaken for actuarial services and there have been questions about how the firm of William M. Mercer, Inc. was chosen. Don Mazanec of'William M. Mercer outlined the history of actuarial services for Fort Collins, noting that he originally worked for A.S. Hansen, which was chosen for the City's actuarial firm. That company was then combined to form Mercer Meidinger Hansen, which was eventually bought out by William M. Mercer, Inc. Don also said that the process his firm follows with other entities is for the entity to prepare a list of the activities it plans to undertake during the next year and asks Mercer for an estimate of the costs of services it will need, (much like the estimate we received for the Education Program) which is then used for the billing of services during the year. It was noted the numerous changes and ideas considered over the last few years did not fit this model. Opal pointed out that by using the request for proposal (RFP) process, the Committee can increase its knowledge of services available and present services can be evaluated and validated. This would involve setting the scope of services, setting standards and deciding on hourly rates. It also involves evaluating the qualifications of the firm and the individual contact person. Opal outlined the process: the Committee determines the services it anticipates needing in the next year, proposals are solicited, the Committee -2- evaluates the proposals and makes a recommendation to the Purchasing Department, which in turn makes the final choice. All Committee members could participate in the process or a few members could represent the Committee. Another option would be for the Committee to choose to stay with William M. Mercer. In this case, the GERC must offer a statement of the firm's capability and justify the Committee's need for their services. This must then be approved by the City manager's office. Members agreed with the desirability of going through the purchasing/bid process. There was extensive discussion on the timing of the effort, with some feeling it would be "changing horses in the middle of the stream" to do it now and others expressing the feeling that there "never is a 'right' time". Mary Crumbaker could offer a legal opinion on what is required of the Committee. To provide additional data for this discussion, Dave Agee, one of the members of the Pension Oversight Committee, presented a memo on Pension Issues dated September 7th, where he reviews the need to address some pension issues related to IRS requirements. He anticipates going through a Request for Proposal (RFP) bid process to solicit the services of a consultant. He suggested that the GERC might solicit services jointly with the POC. It might be possible to begin the bid process while working to formulate and propose the currently contemplated plan changes. The plan changes could be in place by March, 1994, with review of the RFP proposals taking place during the summer, and a decision in the fall, allowing it to fit into the 1994 budget process for implementation of the new contract in January, 1995. CONCLUSIONS/NEXT STEPS: Jerry Brown proposed that the 1994 workplan include targeting the selection of an actuary through an RFP for actuarial services in January, 1995. Jackie Davis seconded the motion. The vote was 4-0, with Alan Krcmarik absent from the meeting at this time. Jackie Davis offered to begin working with Opal on an outline and timeline for this activity. 3. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT MAIN POINTS: In an earlier meeting the GERC had asked Don for a revised "Comparative Summary of Funding Requirements" sheet showing the various proposed changes the Committee is contemplating, but showing the increase in cost as a percentage over the present 3.553% contribution. In response to a question about the error found through the 1993 actuarial report, Don provided information on the individuals who were inadvertently dropped from the Plan and who have been reinstated. These employees went from classified to unclassified positions, but opted to stay in the GER Plan, continue to receive 3.553% contributions towards retirement, and continue to earn service credits. They were dropped from the GERP member list provided by the City to Mercer; this caused the error. CONCLUSION/NEXT STEPS: Dave Agee is working with Edna Hoernicke, Sue Wilcox, and Laurie Harvey in Employee Development on procedures to prevent this lapse from happening again. -3- 4. PLAN CHANGES MAIN POINTS: Dave Agee and Ann Turnquist, who are a sub -group of the Pension Oversight Committee are working on the IRS equity in pensions requirement. Their aim is to outline the issues at stake and hire a consultant to help them work out a plan of changes. Dave proposed that a GERC member be a part of that sub -group in order to insure that GERP interests are represented. Jerry P. Brown offered to work with Ann Turnquist and Dave Agee. For convenience this group is being referred to by the initials of the members--- JAD. There was discussion of how to proceed and in what order to begin to make changes in the Plan. Some of the changes contemplated involve a very small amount of funds and others are significantly more costly. This JAD group would look at all the pension and deferred compensation plans, how they interact, and the possibilities for changes. There was discussion on the possibility of proposing immediate changes for Council consideration. The idea being considered is to propose immediate improvements in the death before age 55 and the vesting schedule aspects of the GER Plan and an option for classified employees to participate in the GER plan and contribute to a defined contribution 401 plan. CONCLUSIONS/NEXT STEPS: At the next meeting the GERC will discuss a presentation at a City Council work session. The Committee will decide at the next meeting what, if any, suggestions for implementation on 1/1/94 will be presented to Council and the JAD workplan for presentation to Council. Related to the issue of improved vesting, Dave Meyer will check with Employee Development to get statistics on turnover rates for new employees. The goal is to determine a proposal that reduces the time of vesting, while minimizing the increased accounting costs for "short term" classified employees. 5. ELECTION OF OFFICERS MAIN POINTS: There was discussion about the succession to the GERC chairpersonship and the timing of terms of office. CONCLUSIONS/NEXT STEPS: Jerry nominated Dennis Sumner to continue in the position of Chairperson and Jackie Davis seconded the nomination. The motion was unanimously approved. Jackie Davis nominated Jerry Brown to be vice - chairperson and Alan seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 6. EMPLOYEE TURNOVER MAIN POINTS: Dave Meyer asked if there was an impact on the fund because City employees are tending to stay employed by the City of Fort Collins longer, due to the recent economic and employment conditions. Don Mazanec explained that he is watching the trends, but that there is no immediate problem.. If it should continue for some time, it might be significant. He is seeing this trend consistent among his other clients also. The average age of City employees is 40.8 years. Thirty-five people left last year. -4- 9 CONCLUSIONS/NEXT STEPS: Don will continue to monitor the trends. ITEMS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION 1. Possible seminars or workshops to increase GER Committee members' knowledge of their roles and responsibilities. 2. GERP / Workers Comp / Disability Proposal 3. Settlements with retired employees with low monthly benefit payments. 4. Monitor progress by staff Pension Oversight Committee. 5. Investment class for members/Public benefit plans workshops. AGENDA & SCHEDULE FOR NEXT MEETING Because of schedule conflicts, the next meeting will be moved to Monday. October 11 at 1.15 p.m. in the 2nd Floor Conference Room. The agenda will include: 1. Plan Member Comments 2. Exploration of Plan Changes. 3. Pension Oversight Committee Report 4. Report on E.L. Team consideration of GERP/Workers Comp/Disability proposal. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 12:20 p.m. MEETING SCHEDULE: The General Employees Retirement Committee meetings are normally held at 1:15 p.m. on the 1st Thursday of each month in the Finance Conference Room. Any change from that will be noted. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1993 THURSDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1993 THURSDAY, JANUARY 6, 1994 THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1994 THURSDAY, MARCH 3, 1994 THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 1994 THURSDAY, MAY 5, 1994 THURSDAY, JUNE 2, 1994 -5-