Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLandmark Preservation Commission - Minutes - 07/13/1983i LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Dick Beardmore Janet Scott Carol Tunner Susan McMillen MEMBERS ABSENT: Wayne Sundberg Glenda McCall STAFF PRESENT: Felix Lee John Dewhirst Debbie Zeigler MUSEUM JUG 21 1983 Brian Moroney appeared before the Commission requesting approval on two different projects. The first was regarding an air conditioning unit that had already been installed on the museum roof. Brian apologized for appearing after the fact, but the circumstances were such that the City had contracted to have four buildings worked on at the same time and the work had been completed before Landmark met. A hole was cut in the roof for easy access to the air conditioner. It now has a hatch with an iron staircase. It is visible from the exterior of the building. The coloring matches the tile. It is not visible from the south and the east. Susan McMillen suggested that now and in the future, things that have already been done before applicant comes to the Commission should not be given approval. She felt since there had been no formal application that negative and positive comments should be registered, but no approval given. Carol Tunner commented that the railing was a little too high, but looked like it was a necessary addition. MOTION was made to approve the air conditioner on the roof of the museum but to look it up in the ordinance to see about non -approval of projects and it will be discussed at the next meeting. MOTION CARRIED. Brian was also requesting approval to remove the roof that is supported by posts. It covers the basement entry. It was added in the 1960's when building was still being used as a library. He proposed to increase the balustrades on both sides to make a safe railing. Susan McMillen made motion to approve. Janet Scott seconded. MOTION CARRIED. OTA Gary Higgins, Ed Freer and Jim Reidhead appeared for Old Town Associates requesting approval on the infill building elevations. Ed Freer pointed out some changes that have been made: 1) Consolidation of planters. 2) Stair orientation. 3) Outdoor dining in front of Rooster Cogburns. 4) Castiron elevation will be same as tables. 5) Location of light fixtures is still not accurate. Materials will be shown for lights at a later date. 6) Paving will have a perimeter banding to cover drains. Elevations for Building A - Whitten Block - Store fronts will have some hollow metal and wood -backed double hung windows. Will try to remove paint chemically. If it is damaging then they will repaint. 9 LPC 7-13-83 Page 2 Elevations for Building B -will consist of one or two retail spaces. The short will be treated the same as the long side which is basically the same as building A. v Elevations for Building C - Black's Glass - They are in question as how to strip the paint. Planning on rehabilitating the windows, adding some stain glass and awnings. Elevations for Building D - offices on second floor with outdoor dining between Buildings D and E. John Dewhirst had some problems with Building B. He pointed out the strong line across the front of A and C. Building B does not follow this. The cap is also a strong statement on A and C. John felt that Building B definitely needs that cap to blend with the others. He pointed out that the guidelines show that these things need to be looked at. Gary Higgens stated that he hoped the Commission would remember that guidelines are exactly that - guidelines. They want it to be an expression of their own and not detract from the historical design. They haven't worked out fine details of facade projections. Susan McMillen asked about a new door on Building F. Gary Higgens said the existing doorway now covered, was to be reopened, and then would be historically correct. Susan McMillen showed concern over metal frames on the windows being used. Gary Higgens felt it was more a question of quality, and that high quality windows would be used. Susan said she had a preference for wood. Elevations for Building G - OTA feels there needs to be a strong corner due to visual impact from College. Elevations for Building L - They will be repainting, repointing brick, replacing storefronts and adding a canopy. Susan McMillen thought that the window scale seemed too small on Building J, but Jim Reidhead said the original windows were about the same size. Dick Beardmore felt that any further questions of the Commission needed more details before final approval and color schemes have not yet been submitted for review. Janet Scott asked if the applicant was seeking final approval of buildings? Gary Higgens said they only wanted the general design and building elevations approved and that elevation details and colors would be submitted later when the final construction documents are completed. Jim Reidhead asked if the plan review and LPC review could occur concurrently. Felix said yes, if the general building configurations had LPC approval. Dick suggested that LPC prepare a list of concerns for applicant. Susan indicated that the areal other property owners are concerned that the Commission has given approvals "on faith" concerning proposed materials, (windows, metal). These LPC 7-13-83 Page 3 "Others" are watching andfeeling LPC is rubber stamping the project. Susan is concerned that when the actual construction occurs, it won't be as was conceptualized in hearings. Dick stated that they won't make final decision until they have construction documents. LPC needs more time to review all of the material submitted to make decision and digest it. Another meeting was planned to review the package. Linden Square Roger Evans appeared before the Commission seeking conceptual approval on Phase I of Linden Square Development because he wishes to submit his plans to Building Inspection in two weeks. He showed the Commission elevations and photographs of original buildings. What he proposes is not an exact replication but intented to provide a compatible restoration of the original facade. They propose to remove the paint if process is not too damaging. If it is they will repaint. The original cornice was removed and a new one will be installed. Dick Beardmore abstained from voting because of conflict of interest. Susan McMillen made motion to approve documents as submitted without colors. Colors are to be reviewed later. Carol Turner seconded. MOTION CARRIED. Meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Richard Beardmore, Chairman Felix Lee, Staff Support RB/FL/dz