Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLandmark Preservation Commission - Minutes - 09/07/1988LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING - MINUTES September 7, 1988 The meeting began at approximately 5:30 p.m. at 200 West Mountain Avenue. Members attending were Wayne Sundberg, Prescott Handley, Carol Tunner, Reba Massey and Bud Frick. Staff was represented by Kari VanMeter and Joyce Lew - ton. The minutes of August 3, 1988 stood approved as submitted. Ms. VanMeter and Mr. Sundberg reviewed the Rules of Order for Public Hear- ings for the Commission. These rules delete the agenda review and Ms. VanMeter suggested the Commission meet the evening prior to the regular hearing for an actual field review of the applications. This would give Ms. VanMeter an additional day to contact petitioners when the Commission needs additional information. Ms. VanMeter pointed out that because of the quasi- judicial nature of the decisions made by this Commission, members should be quite careful to refrain from any discussion regarding approval or disap- proval prior to the time of the public hearing. Nominations for the Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson were opened by Mr. Sundberg. The term of office is one year and elections are held at the dis- cretion of the Chairperson. The Vice -Chairperson serves as a replacement for the Chairperson when he/she is unable to attend. The Chairperson serves as the contact with the staff person of the Historic Preservation office and conducts the meetings of the Landmark Preservation Commission in a timely manner. Ms. Massey nominated Mr. Sundberg for the position of Chair- person. Ms. Tunner nominated herself for the Vice -Chairperson position. Nominations were declared closed by Mr. Sundberg. Nominees were approved 5-0. CURRENT ITEMS Trimble Block Awnings Staff recommended approval of four rigid frame awnings with signage of block lettering on vinyl material with the putty background, dark red and dark green stripes without backlit illumination since the guidelines spe- cifically make a recommendation against illumination of signage. If the Commission should approve the illumination, the wording in the finding should be very specific as it would be a precedent -setting ruling. Ms. Tunner expressed concern that at one time the Commission approved only one particular style of lettering for the Old Town area. Mr. Frick pointed out that was for one building and was made for consistency in that building only. Mr. Frick expressed concern that the awning was to be taut rather than being loosely draped. Mr. Charles Peterson argued in favor of the taut vinyl awnings because of the additional life over the canvas and retractable awnings. The conserva- tive color, style and fabric were chosen because of weather considerations. He also spoke about the backlit illumination concerning how dark Old Town and this building was. The small awning over the entry to the apartment stairway would especially benefit by being backlit. Mr. Peterson pointed out the possibilities of rejuvenating the downtown area with the increased exposure of the merchant's advertising with backlit signage. Ms. Trimble spoke to the Commission concerning the history of the building and encouraged approval of the backlit awnings. Ms. Handley requested more information on the light levels, comparisons of color and light illumination factors as well as the details of illumination for the three options of backlighting which are: 1) lighting underneath the awning; 2) Gooseneck fixtures; and 3) small spots located on the ground or on a pole and aimed at the awning. Mr. Peterson pointed out the awnings need to be approved and in place before inclement weather sets in. Ms. Massey moved to approve all four awnings as presented without illumina- tion, at this time, with the contingency that the applicant submit color and lettering detail of the small awning for staff approval. Ms. Handley seconded the motion. Motion to approve passed 5-0. Ms. Tunner requested the guidelines be reconciled as to illumination with specific language as to shading, degree of illumination, deflections, and location of lights in awnings. Mr. Peterson volunteered to work with the committee to write up the necessary language. Colorado Classics Mr. Frick moved to approve modification of the storefront with the stipula- tion that Thunderpup finish painting to match the existing window frame. Thunderpup did have a miscommunication as to approval of the modification by the LPC. This was entirely due to an internal communication error. Ms. Tunner seconded the motion. Motion to approve passed 5-0. AcScents Staff recommended the repainting of the first story window trim, kick plate, and door in dark green color of high gloss enamel. Mr. Frick moved to approve the application as submitted. Ms. Massey seconded the motion. Motion to approve passed 5-0. Point of View Since the arch, as approved, was never constructed over the Point of View entryway and appears to be a relatively minor design detail, and in order to maintain a good working relationship, staff recommended deletion of the arch from the previously approved design. Ms. Tunner commented that the arches presently in place are all over double doors. She added that requir- ing an arch over the single door would make the facade look unbalanced. Ms. Tunner moved to approve this application as submitted. Ms. Handley sec- onded. Motion to approve passed 5-0. 0 • Building E - Shed Roof Staff recommended approval, as proposed, for the exterior, detachable screening to be placed on the shed roof of Building E, subject to screen and frame color choices. Staff recommended either charcoal or dark bronze colors. Mr. Eric Near, representing Foxfire Property Management, stated the reasons for requesting screening as 1) heat gain and 2) merchandise sun damage. The reasons for choosing this screening are: 1) detachable for ease in cleaning; 2) will take only one day to put in place; and 3) each window has a screen and frame to fit and will support the snow load. Each frame will match the screen and will clip in place. The frame will be centered over the mullion and will not be visible. Mr. Frick questioned Mr. Near as to how much the screens would stretch with a snow load. If the screen only sits 1/2-3/4" from the glass, with a snow load the screen could stretch and stick to the glass. Mr. Near stated he would check into the elasticity, warranties, length of life, and possibility of upgrades. Mr. Frick moved to approve screening on Building E with the dark bronze screen color with the clarification that the screen frame width will not be wider than the mul- lion system for the windows and that consideration be given to set the screen sufficiently away from the window so they do not sag and stick to the windows. The color of the screen should be uniform throughout and the color of the frame should match the existing window system. Ms. Tunner sec- onded. Motion to approve passed 5-0. Colorado Classics - Signage Staff recommended approval of canvas sign within the arch with the condi- tion that the color match adjacent awnings. Mr. Mike Wittmer, of Signs and Designs, represented Colorado Classics and AcScents, stated the green can- vas sign in the arch would be lashed with white nylon rope, inset about 3" from the metal with white lettering. The #4 and #7 windows will be lettered in white. Mr. Frick questioned the original intent of the arches as to whether they were a design element or was it for signs. Ms. Tunner stated the color of the sign was compatible but Mr. Frick pointed out the white lashing would be too much of a contrast. Black lashing would be more unob- trusive in the I -hole spacing of 2/3". Ms. Handley moved to accept Proposal A contingent upon an alternative lashing color to the white proposed. Mr. Frick seconded the motion. Motion to approve passed 5-0. AcScents Staff recommended approval of the proposed signage. Mike Wittmer explained the window frame color, dark green, would be picked up in the design and 1/8" outline. Ms. Tunner moved to approve the application as submitted. Ms. Massey seconded the motion. Motion was approved 5-0. Ms. Tunner requested a clarification and position paper on brick damage by attaching awnings and signs into brick rather than mortar. Ms. VanMeter stated she would consult with Chris GreBenc. The meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Minutes submitted by Joyce Lewton.