HomeMy WebLinkAboutLandmark Preservation Commission - Minutes - 10/14/1997i • C3_Qx'�i,D
LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
October 14, 1997
Council Liaison: Scott Mason
Staff Liaison: Joe Frank
Commission Chairperson: Jennifer Carpenter (225-0690)
SUMMARY OF MEETING: Paint colors were approved for the Trimble and Barkley
Blocks, 132 —144 North College Avenue. Mike Herzig, Engineering Department,
presented plans for the alley to the east of the C & S Depot. A re -roof, repainting
and a new furnace was approved for Part 2 State Tax Credit, at 511 Mathews, the
Otis House. The LPC discussed the addition of a consent agenda entry to the
existing agenda format.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order 5:35 p.m., at
281 North College Avenue. Commission members Jennifer Carpenter, Bud Frick,
Angela Milewski, Stephen Short and James Tanner were present. Per Hogestad and
Diana Ross were absent. Tim Wilder represented Staff.
GUESTS: Jim Reidhead, owners' representative and Mark Thorbum of University
Designers and Builders and Michael McCormick bind Michael Early, owners, 132-144
North College, Trimble and Barkley Blocks; Mike Herzig, Engineering Department, City
of Fort Collins; Steve Levinger, owner, 511 Mathews, the Otis House.
AGENDA REVIEW: Item #4 on the agenda, 832 West Oak, the W. E. Mahood House,
Interior Kitchen Renovation for Part 1, State Tax Credit was withdrawn from the
discussion.
STAFF REPORTS: None.
COMMISSION MEMBERS' REPORTS: Ms. Carpenter informed the Commission that
Ms. Tunner and Ms. McWilliams were attending the National Trust Convention.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The September 23, 1997 LPC meeting minutes were
corrected on page 3, third paragraph where 575 Remington was changed to read 515
Remington.
Mr. Short moved to accept the September 23, 1997 LPC meeting minutes as
amended. The motion was seconded by Ms. Milewski, which passed
unanimously. (5-0)
CURRENT DESIGN REVIEW:
Landmark Preservation Commission
October 14, 1997
Page 2
132 144 North College Trimble and Barkley Blocks — Paint Color Selections and
Upper Cornice Signage. Final Review
The Sherwin Williams preservation palette was used to chose the proposed paint colors
for the three storefronts, which were referred to as A, B and C. Paint colors presented
for storefront B included Colony Yellow and Roycroft Copper. The applicants examined
black and whites photos to help to determine the darker areas and shadows in the
facade. The lintels and the corbels are the darkest elements. Mr.Thorbum reviewed
the four color options for storefront B. Mr. Frick suggested that the soffits and eaves
should remain light and the shadow lines will make them appear darker. Storefront C,
has been proposed to be painted with lighter colors, which again will allow for the
architectural detail to standout with shadow lines. Mr. Short would like to see the
vertical background darker and the soffits left lighter. Mr. Tanner added that they
should keep the storefront light for shadowing and to keep it simple for easy
maintenance. The LPC agreed that the use of lighter colors allowed for the
architectural details to stand out more.
Mr. Frick moved to approve the color selection for the Trimble and Barkley Blocks
as presented. Building B with New Colonial and Roycroft Copper, Building C
with Downing Sand and Rockwood bark Red for the doors and Building A with
Rockwood Antique Gold, Ouartersawn Oak and Polished Mahogany. Stephen
Short seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. (5-0)
It was added that the block signage will be completed according to photo -
documentation on Building B in a high gloss black and that traditional second story
window signage will be applied.
Courtesy Review of Plans to Develop Alley on the East of 136 LaPorte the C & S
Depot Mike Herzig, Engineering Department
Mr. Herzig explained that the alley will be converted to a parking lot. First the alley will
be paved. A raised curb will be installed and landscaping will be added. A sidewalk will
be constructed, connecting Maple Street to LaPorte Avenue. The railroad fence, which
was built in 1978 out of light rail track, will be removed. The fence is not historic and is
not in good enough shape to be used for the extension of the trolley rail. It does have
the year 1897 stamped on it, but it was installed in 1978. Before the fence is thrown
away, Mr. Herzig will contact staff. Mr. Tanner suggested that they contact the
museum. Ms. Carpenter asked about the proposed landscape design. Mr. Herzig
explained they will install shrubs with a drip irrigation system. Ms. Carpenter expressed
some concern regarding the water against the sandstone foundation of Washington's.
He explained that more xeriscape shrubs will be planted. Ms. Milewski said that there
was not a problem as long as a good pitch was maintained from the foundation to the
building. Mr. Frick and Mr. Herzig discussed the overall drainage plan for the site,
including the installation of downspouts off the depot. Ms. Carpenter and Ms. Milewski
had concerns regarding the installation of asphalt right up against the building. They
suggested that landscaping and the use of a rock mulch for good drainage should be
1
Landmark Preservation Commission
October 14, 1997
Page 3
used to make it look nicer. Ms. Carpenter also suggested a pedestrian walkway though
the parking lot.
511 Mathews Otis House Re Roof, Repaint and New Heating System for Part 2.
State Tax Credit (Steve Levinger, owner)
Mr. Levinger explained that the work for Part 2 of the State Tax Credit program has
been completed. He submitted photographs and described the new furnace/water
heater. He said that the old roof had three layers, which had to be removed. A 7/16
inch OSB decking was installed over the frame and then a forty year dimensional
shingle roof was laid. The chipping paint on the house was removed down to the
boards. Mr. Frick questioned the changes made to his original costs. The applicant
explained that a basement wall needed to be removed in order to take out the old
furnace. The wall was not original. Mr. Levinger does not intend to rebuild it. The new
furnace unit is much smaller. The cost of painting did increase from $500 to $700, due
to the cost of a specialized tool used to remove the badly chipping paint.
Mr. Frick moved to approve the re -roof, repainting and new heating system for
Part 2, State Tax Credit. Mr. Tanner seconded the motion, which passed
unanimously. (5-0)
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Suggested Change to Agenda Format A Consent Agenda Entry ( Staff and
Chairperson Carpenter)
Ms. Carpenter explained that she met with staff to discuss the addition of a consent
agenda entry to the existing LPC agenda, when there are no perceived questions or
concerns regarding an issue. Local Landmark designations may frequently be able to
be included on the consent agenda. She explained that anyone from the Commission
or the public can pull an issue to be discussed. Different Councils and Commissions
handle this situation in different ways. Ms. Milewski liked the idea of being able to pull
an issue for discussion right away if necessary.
Mr. Short requested that staff point put changes in the costs of state tax credit projects
in the staff report. Ms. Milewski agreed that newer members will not recognize changes
from one stage of a project to another.
Ms. Carpenter added that staff should still recognize the importance of a property
proposed for Local Landmark Designation. She suggested that slides of the property
be presented, even when the application is included on the consent agenda.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Mr. Frank reported that there is no LPC review required over the food truck which
existed in Old Town plaza this summer and fall. The City Attorney explained that it is
Landmark Preservation Commission
October 14, 1997
Page 4
considered to be a temporary structure.
Mr. Frank also discussed that Bonnie and Kim Szidon, owners of Ranchway Feeds,
have been researching ways for their business to become more efficient. They are
studying several alternative sites for expansion, including an addition to the existing
facility on the eastern portion of the site, a new tall building adjoining the west end of
the facility, or the construction of a new facility on the western portion of the site. They
have discovered that to build on vertically would be more cost effective than to add on
horizontally to their current manufacturing facility. They would like to go twenty to thirty
feet higher with the building. They do not intend to destroy any historic fabric existing at
the facility. An addition on the East Side would require less capital, but would require
higher operating costs. While a new building on the West Side would require greater
capital, it would result in lower manufacturing costs ultimately. The LPC discussed that
a tall addition would have less of an impact if clustered with the taller parts of the
facility. The owners are open to investigating different architectural designs and the site
is a landmark, so the proposal will come through the LPC for review. Mr. Frick stressed
the importance of having the facility downtown because it adds to the charm of Old
Town. Mr. Frank added that it is part of the heritage of downtown and it has been there
for 120 years.
Mr. Wilder informed the Commission that Greg Belcher is seeking a waiver for a
number of sections of Article 4 in Chapter 14. He provided a copy of 14:53, Waiver of
Conditions, for Commission members. The applicant plans to move the Webster
Farmhouse to 907 Meldrum. The site where the farmhouse exists is planned for
redevelopment. Mr. Belcher is seeking a waiver of the demolition delay process. He
said that discussion on this specific request will take place at the next meeting.
The meeting adjourned 7:00 p.m.
Submitted by Nicole Sneider, Secretary.