Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLandmark Preservation Commission - Minutes - 12/08/19990 0 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Meeting December 8, 1999 Minutes Council Liaison: Scott Mason (226 — 4824) Staff Liaison: Joe Frank (221-6376) Commission Chairperson: Per Hogestad (303-292-1875) SUMMARY OF MEETING: The LPC reviewed conceptual ideas for a rear stairway at 243 Jefferson Street. The LPC recommended the adoption of the resolution stating that a preliminary investigation of the Sheely Drive Neighborhood indicates that the properties are eligible for designation as a landmark district. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Mr. Hogestad called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m., at 281 North College Avenue. Commission members Angela Milewski, Angie Aguilera, Agnes Dix, Bud Frick, Janet Ore, and Rande Pouppirt were present. Carol Tunner, Karen McWilliams, and Joe Frank represented staff. GUESTS: Wally Walberg, owner, Marlen's Tire, 243 Jefferson Street; Veda Hogestad, homeowner of 1601 Sheely Drive; Richard and Jan Devore, homeowners of 1617 Sheely Drive; Donna and Reuel Rolston, homeowners of 1612 Sheely Drive; Jack and Deb Applin, homeowners of 1608 Sheely Drive; Polly Puleston, homeowner of 1613 Sheely Drive; Jana and Bob Brandes, homeowners of 1600 Sheely Drive; John and Pat Wilkins Wells, homeowners of 1609 Sheely Drive; and Jennifer Carpenter, citizen, present for the Sheely Drive Local Landmark Designation hearing. AGENDA REVIEW: None. STAFF REPORTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBERS' REPORTS: Ms. Milewski reported that she did not attend the latest Downtown Development Authority meeting and Mr. Frick did attend. He reported that the Fort Collins Museum was expanding. Mr. Frick provided plans that included adding the Franz -Smith cabin to the park setting. He also suggested that they include the pipe stave garage in the site. The DDA also discussed displaying art in the empty storefronts downtown. Steve Slezak, owner of the Davis/Humphrey House, gave the DDA a fagade easement on it. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The September 22, LPC meeting minutes were accepted as submitted. CURRENT DESIGN REVIEW: 243 Jefferson Street — Conceptual Review of Adding Rear Second Floor Door/Deck/Circular Staircase (Wally Walbero Marlen's Tire) Landmark Preservation Commission December 8, 1999 Regular Meeting V s Page 2 Ms. Tunner showed an older slide of the rear of the building. Wally Walberg, owner, explained that the tenants upstairs would like a door upstairs on the back of the building. Ms. Tunner pointed out evidence in the brick that a door had existed on the back originally. She added that the owner was also interested in adding a deck to the back of the building. She pointed out that the building next door has a door and staircase added to the rear. She suggested that the owner use a similar design, with a landing and a staircase. The owner wants the building to meet code for the tenants upstairs and would like the LPC to do a conceptual review tonight. He intends on using the Design Assistance Program to get professional design input. Mr. Frick stated that on the inside, in the center of the second floor, there was evidence of an arched brick opening and beams. He added that it looked like they may have been old roof beams with the brick built around them. Mr. Walberg showed pictures of the inside. He said that he liked the design of the spiral staircase built onto the Old Firehouse. Mr. Frick discussed the square footage of the second floor and how it may pertain to the building code and the need for a rear exit upstairs. Mr. Walberg said that he still might be interested in building a deck up there. He discussed some of his ideas for the deck and the staircase. Mr. Hogestad explained that if there were evidence that a door was there originally, then it would not be a problem to re-create a door. Mr. Ore asked how much of the back of the building was visible. Ms. Tunner explained that the extension on the back of the building next door came out quite a bit and obscured the view. Mr. Walberg said that he would look for a photo with the original back door. Ms. Tunner suggested to look at other buildings on the block that were built before the turn of the century. She added that the original 1880s door was probably made with vertical panels. Ms. Ore suggested that the owner replicate the segmental arch design in the brick over the door to match the original windows. Mr. Walberg also added that he was interested is using a door with a window to bring some natural light in. DESIGNATION: Sheely Drive Local Landmark District Resolution Hearing Ms. McWilliams reviewed the statement of significance for the proposed Sheely Drive Neighborhood Historic District from the staff report. The neighborhood is eligible for designation as a Fort Collins Local Landmark District, for its innovative architecture, for its historic association with several prominent local business people and civic leaders, and for its portrayal of the social, economic, and technological changes occurring in Fort Collins and Colorado following World War II. Ms. McWilliams showed slides of each house and described the design of the neighborhood. The addresses to be included in the District are 1600, 1601, 1604, 1605, 1608, 1609, 1612, 1613, 1617, 1645, and 1700 Sheely Drive. Ms. McWilliams said that the design of the neighborhood breaks out of the traditional grid pattern and the streets and houses are built along curves. This creates a sense of being in the country and a cohesiveness throughout the neighborhood. She also pointed out that the curve of Sheely Drive follows the natural line of the ridge. 1600 Sheely Dr. is a low ranch style home. The mortar design between the bricks is interesting and is called weeping mortar. The front entryway has a covered porch and • Landmark Oreservarion Commission December 8, 1999 Pegular Meetinoutes Page 3 0 the fapade has smaller windows. The rear elevation has wider windows and the property has the first or second installed in -ground pool in Fort Collins, which also has sidewalls. Mr. Hogestad explained that Ben Olds developed the houses and used Valley Block. He explained that the houses were used to showcase what could be done with block and a lot of the same windows are repeated throughout the neighborhood. 1601 Sheely Dr. exhibited the use of wood shakes on the roof, which adds texture. Glass block was also used. Ms. McWilliams highlighted the use of sun -screening elements with adjustable louvers in the rear. The landscape of the yard also uses a lot of terracing. 1604 Sheely has a carport. The design of the structure is a pitched roof with large windows. The end walls of the structure push out further than the vertical lines, creating a long, low horizontal design. 1605 Sheely Dr. emphasized the two -car garage and the use of different building materials. The brick and sidewall also extends past the rest of the home. It is a 1950s ranch style with a typical corner window. The overhanging eaves help to create the entryway. Mr. Hogestad pointed out the use of the pipe column that imply an international style and a more modernist approach. The rear elevation exhibits different levels and shapes and a prominent deck. 1608 Sheely Dr. exhibits horizontal stone, similar to that used on the Colorado State University buildings from the 1950s. Ms. McWilliams pointed out the scalloped boards on the gable. 1609 Sheely Dr. has a chimney that comes right through the porch roof. It also has casement windows. 1612 Sheely Dr. is located at the corner and the house is built in an L-shape to better fit in its location. It also exhibits a large bay window. 1613 Sheely Dr. has a prominent focus on the garage. A new addition was added to the home in a very sympathetic design. Ms McWilliams explained that the addition did not compromise the integrity of the home. 1617 Sheely Dr. has a shed addition that was built in 1997 and does not connect to the home. The house is unaltered . Ms. McWilliams explained that the house retains its integrity and its contributing status to the district. 1645 Sheely Dr. has been somewhat altered. It was speculated that the front windows on the left side of the entry were smaller than the presumed original. The rear has a two-story deck that has been enclosed. Enough of the massing and design elements of Landmark Preservation Commission December 8, 1999 Regular Meeting Mir Page 4 the original design have been maintained that the house is still contributing to the Local Landmark district. 1700 Sheely Dr. has a design which is symmetrical, but features asymmetrical details. The plane of the roof extends over the gables. Interior details include glass block and steel casement windows. In the rear, the kitchen section comes out at an angle. This design breaks away from the rectangular shape and the material changes at this section as well, from brick to siding. Ms. McWilliams explained that the LPC was reviewing these homes in the Sheely Drive, First and Second additions for designation. Around the corner, in the 1900 block and beyond, the houses change to more 1970s styles. Maybe at some time in the future the neighborhood district could be extended. Mr. Hogestad asked if there was any public input. Jennifer Carpenter, citizen, said that she was excited because it is important to recognize the uniqueness of this era of architecture. She added that this neighborhood is an excellent example. Mr. Frick moved to recommend that the LPC adopt a resolution stating that the preliminary investigation by the Commission indicates that the Sheely Drive Neighborhood Historic District is eligible for designation as a landmark district. The district is significant for its innovative architecture, for its historical associations with several prominent Fort Collins business and civic leaders, and for its portrayal of the social, economic, and technological changes occurring in Fort Collins and Colorado following World War II. Ms. Ore seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. (7-0) Ms. McWilliams explained that no building permits could be issued for work on the buildings in the proposed district until after Council's action. Ms. Ore reported that this resolution to designate a Local Landmark District was on the cutting edge in historic preservation. Ms. McWilliams added that staff did not receive any letters or phone calls in opposition to this resolution. OTHER BUSINESS: None. The meeting adjourned 6:58 p.m. Submitted by Nicole (Sneider) Kaplan, Secretary