HomeMy WebLinkAboutElectric Board - Minutes - 08/20/2007Fort Collins Utilities Electric Board Minutes
Monday, August 20, 2007
Electric Board Chair
John Morris, 377-8221
Electric Board Vice Chair
Dan Bihn, 218-1962
City Council Liaison
Wade Troxell
Staff Liaison
DeEtta Carr, 221-6702
Roll Call:
Board Present
Chairperson John Morris, Tom Bamish, Dan Bihn, John Harris, Jeff Lebesch and Steve Wolley
Absent
John Graham
City Council Liaison
Wade Troxell
Visitors
Eric Sutherland
Staff Present:
Kraig Bader, Bill Bray, Terri Bryant, DeEtta Carr, Eric Dahlgren, Joyce Grenz, Brian Janonis,
Bob Micek, John Phelan, Tom Rock, Ellen Switzer, Dennis Sumner and Norm Weaver
Meetin¢ Convened
Chairperson John Morris called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m.
Citizen Participation
Regarding The Rocky Mountain Sustainable Living Fair, Eric Sutherland said:
1. He was expressing concerns about the view expressed by vendors at the
Sustainable Living Fair;
2. He feels adoption of biofuels should not be promoted at Sustainable Living Fair;
3. He feels City sponsorship endorses these views; and
4. Thanked City Staff for correcting information on the Web site.
Minutes of April 18, 2007
Board Member Tom Bamish made a motion, which was seconded, to approve the minutes of the
June 20, 2007, meeting. The motion passed unanimously.
Electric Board Meeting Minutes
Monday, August 20, 2007
Page 2
2008-2009 Budget Presented to the Electric Board
Utilities Finance and Budget Manager Terri Bryant introduced Ellen Switzer, Utilities Financial
Operations Manager, and stated that Ms. Switzer would be giving the presentation for the 2008-
2009 Budget to the Electric Board. Ms. Bryant said Ms. Switzer is the primary accountant for
the Light and Power Fund. Ms. Bryant said the one big unknown Ms. Switzer will address
through her presentation is where Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) will be going with rates
in the future. Utilities made some projections based on the preliminary information they have
from PRPA. Ms. Bryant wanted to caution the Electric Board the information is preliminary and
has not been finalized.
Ms. Switzer stated that this was her 34s' Light and Power Budget. Ms. Switzer said the City
used Budgeting for Outcomes process for the 2008-2009 Budget which focuses on results and
emphasizes accountability. The process determines how much revenue will be available and the
results that matter most to citizens. Those results are: economic health, environmental health,
neighborhood quality, safe community, cultural and recreational opportunities, transportation
and high performing government. The budgeting process allocated revenue to achieve each
result and decides how to best deliver the results citizens expect. The City Manager issues the
recommended budget on September 4, 2007. City Council will review and make changes in the
budget at the series of study sessions and public hearings, and then Council will make final
appropriations in November.
2009-2009 Budget Assumptions and Highlights
• The budget was developed using the following assumptions:
o Growth projected at 1 percent per year;
o Inflation estimated at 3 percent per year;
o Purchase power rates are projected to increase 3 percent in 2008, 3.7 percent in
2009 and 3 percent per year through 2012;
o Retail electric rates are projected to increase an average of 2.3 percent in 2008
and 2.7 percent in 2009;
o Development charges are projected to increase based on costs of labor and
materials; and
o Salaries estimated to increase 3 to 4 percent per year.
• Retail Rates — As shown above, retail electric rates are projected to increase an average
of 2.3 percent in 2008 and 2.7 percent in 2009. The purchase power increases will be
passed through to the energy and demand components of each rate class. The fixed
charges and facilities demand charges will not change. As a result, the rate increase will
vary for each rate class going up slightly more in the commercial and industrial classes
than in the residential. Based on Platte River Power Authority's wholesale rate
projections, retail rates are projected to increase 2.3 percent each year from 2010-2012.
• The proposed 2008 budget is 17.9 percent (or $15.3 million) greater than the adopted
2007 budget. The increase is primarily due to an ambitious capital program (+$11.5
million) and the increased purchase power (+2.4 million). The payment to the Customer
Services and Administration (CS&A) fund is also projected to increase about $1 million.
-2-
Electric Board Meeting Minutes
Monday, August 20, 2007
Page 3
• Operations and maintenance budgets are stable. Three landscape maintenance employees
will be transferred to the CS&A Fund in 2008 offsetting inflationary and salary increases
resulting in zero percent increase in the O&M budget for 2008.
• Energy Services continues funding to meet energy supply policy goals, other ongoing
conservation and community service programs and 68 percent of City's Climate Wise
program.
• Purchase Power includes funding for renewables to meet the goals of the Energy Supply
Policy.
• Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILOTs) continue to be budgeted at 6 percent of revenues.
• Light and Power's portion of Utilities CS&A increased approximately $1 million in
2008. These are estimates; 2008-2009 transfers to CS&A will be based on actual
expenses which are typically less than budget. The 2008 increases include the following:
o New positions: Executive Director and Project Manager — Assets;
o Transfer of Regulatory and Governmental Affairs Division (5 positions) and
landscape maintenance crew;
o Increased IT costs for operations and capital replacement; and
o Capital replacement of the Customer Service Division phone system and
additional capital funding for automated meter reading.
• There are large capital projects and system additions planned in the next two years:
o Capital Projects:
✓ Electric Substation (Trilby) — $5.2 million (2008);
✓ Replace Building C — $4.4 million (2008);
✓ Southwest Annexation — $0.8 million per year (2008 and 2009); and
✓ Wi Fi Pilot Project.
o System Addition:
✓ Major Ductbanks and Circuits — $1.2 million per year (2008 and 2009);
✓ Replacement of UG Cable —$1.0 million per year (2008 and 2009);
✓ UG Equipment Upgrades —$1.4 million per year (2008 and 2009); and
✓ Transformer Purchases — $1.6 million per year (2008 and 2009).
Reserves — Based on the aggressive capital program, reserves are projected to decrease
from $56.5 million at year end 2008, to $39.5 million at year end 2009. Projected 2009
reserves will meet all of Light and Power's reserve policy requirements.
No other significant shifts in priorities or resources are planned.
Budget Summary
• Total Light and Power Budget
o 2008 is $100.8 million and 2009 is $95.4 million
• Retail Rate Increases
o 2008 is 2.3 percent and 2009 is 2.7 percent (Pass through PRPA increases)
• 2 percent of revenues targeted for Energy Supply Policy
o 1 percent Renewables; and
o 1 percent DSM and energy conservation.
• Reduced growth projections —1 percent
• Use of reserves to meet capital needs:
o Trilby Substation;
-3-
Electric Board Meeting Minutes
Monday, August 20, 2007
Page 4
o Replace aging UG infrastructure;
o Duct Banks; and
o New facility for crews and equipment.
Financial Policies
• Increase Net Assets (Income After Contributions and Transfers)
o 2008-$3,352,712 and 2009-$3,168,332
• Reserves
o Operating Reserve — 8 percent of operating budget less purchase power.
✓ Fully funded at about $1.6 million in 2008-2009
o Art in Public Places - 1 percent of specified capital appropriations.
o Capital Reserve — 20 percent of cost of 5 year capital improvements.
✓ Fully funded at $16.5 million in 2008-2009
o Purchase Power Reserve — targeted at up to 25% of annual operation revenue.
✓ PP Reserve was 34 percent of revenue year end 2006 (about $27 million);
✓ PP Reserve is projected to decrease over the next two years to the 25
percent level; and
✓ Since the reserve is projected to return to the established target in 2009,
staff recommends that Council take no action to reduce the Purchase
Power Reserve at this time.
o Reserves will be drawn down and used to fund portions of the capital and system
additions projects.
✓ $12.3 million in 2008; and
✓ $ 3.5 million in 2009.
Board Member Tom Barnish asked in Budgeting for Outcomes, is there a group that goes
through Customer Service and Administration Fund (CS&A) in the same way so there is some
logic as to where the fund is spent. The process for doing the budget for CS&A is slightly
different. Managers write the offers as in Budgeting for Outcomes and prepare their budget. The
offers are reviewed by the Executive Director. The cost of CS&A is included in each one of the
funds. Payments and Transfer Offers are reviewed a second time by the Results teams. The
costs can go up and down each year for each fund depending on capital expenses. Transfers are
based on actual expenses.
It was asked whether CSU's electrical account is considered residential or industrial. Ms.
Switzer said CSU's electrical account is considered industrial. Ms. Switzer then asked if there
was a motion recommending that City Council adopt the proposed 2008-2009 Budget and Rate
Increases. Board Member Dan Bihn motioned to adopt the 2008-2009 Budget and Rate
Increases with John Harris seconding the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Electric Energy Supply Policy
Review of Goals
Chairperson John Morris summarized the original goals of the Electric Energy Supply Policy
which were to reduce the per capita consumption by 10 percent by 2012. Since the time of the
policy, the consumption has been brought down by 2.8 percent and it seems to be staying pretty
ME
Electric Board Meeting Minutes
Monday, August 20, 2007
Page 5
steady. The Electric Energy Supply Policy may be running behind on reducing the per capita
consumption. Another goal was to reduce the per capita demand by 15 percent by 2012. In
2007, we are up 1 percent. It has come down a little from the 2006 levels, but per capita demand
is up from 2005. We are not on track to meet the demand goal. Renewable energy needs to
increase to 15 percent by 2017, and we are now at 3.6 percent. That means we have 10 years to
increase by 2 '/z times.
Board Member Tom Barnish asked if the 15 percent renewable energy target was applied to both
the per capita energy usage target, as well as the actual per capita energy usage. Do we have that
number? We have a certain amount of renewable energy that we're buying based on the per
capita energy usage target. Are we on track to meet that target, because if we're exceeding the
per capita usage target, on that basis that can be interpreted as not meeting the renewable target.
The issue was that when you reported 3.2 percent renewables, he was concerned because that
may be way behind the renewable target, but if it is a higher percent of our target per capita
energy use instead of actual, then the 15 percent renewable goal by 2017 is not too far off. The
focus would then be on meeting the failing measure, or per capita energy usage in this case.
Chairperson John Morris said what was talked about was developing aggressive, strategic plans
to reach these goals. If we are running behind in those, Mr. Morris said he feels it is worthwhile
for the Electric Board to re -talk. Mr. Morris said he believes that Board Member Tom Barnish
had suggested either adjusting the goals to what is more realistic, or getting more aggressive.
Mr. Morris said this was just a quick summary of the key highlights of the Electric Energy
Supply Policy and that we are falling behind. Mr. Morris feels the other areas in the Electric
Energy Supply Policy are either being met or are exceeding the expectations. He wants to make
sure the Electric Board has time to discuss these issues.
Update of Staff Review of Energy Policy Strategic Policy
Customer and Employee Relations Manager Patty Bigner wanted to talk about the REC issue
first. Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) is in the process of bringing a renewable policy to
their board for adoption and is very close to adoption which would change the resource mix from
currently 83 percent RECs and 17 percent energy. This would change closer to 40-50 percent
RECs and energy. PRPA is interested in balancing that. When the current strategy was adopted,
it was after many discussions at the Energy Board meetings to decide what was going to be the
best way to move closer to our renewable energy policy. This was based primarily on the
effectiveness of RECs, if they were purchased in a responsible manner and the cost. The cost
was a big driver and it has allowed them to get to where they are now. A couple of changes that
have taken place since they received the policy are the addition of Green-e Certification which
really provides some quality assurance to their program. There have been a lot of changes in the
market and the market environment prompting them to look at changing the resource mix. Ms.
Bigner said they think that RECs are still going to be a valuable resource for them in the next
few years, but they have no idea what the REC market will be like after 2010. The City of Fort
Collins and Platte River Power Authority share the concern for RECs and are moving to make a
course correction.
-5-
Electric Board Meeting Minutes
Monday, August 20, 2007
Page 6
Ms. Bigner said they have heard there are a number of questions, both in the community and by
City Council members, about the Renewable Energy Policy goal as to whether it is at the right
level. Fort Collins Utilities is prepared to implement the policy as it is now. Utilities next big
purchase will be in 2011, and the next one prior to the goal. They are not sure what the market
will look like in 2011, so they don't know if a rate increase will be needed. Ms. Bigner said
that's where they are now. The City does not actually purchase RECs, but purchases renewable
energy. How renewable energy is provided to the City of Fort Collins is determined in
collaboration with Platte River Power Authority. Ms. Bigner said the Electric Board will make a
decision to make a suggestion on direction to PRPA. Ms. Bigner said they feel comfortable in
the direction they are going in now.
Ms. Bigner said what they are really focused on now is an update to their strategic plan. They
have had preliminary discussions about what their progress had been with their current
programs. For the last few years, they have been in the process of ramping up those programs,
developing and refining them. What they want to do now is to really focus on increasing
participation. Fort Collins Utilities still firmly believes energy efficiency is the way to solve
this particular problem and they want to put their efforts toward that. Ms. Bigner said what their
plan will be is to get together internally, unless the Electric Board has other ideas, to start to look
at where they are, what they feel needs to happen and come up with some proposals. They will
bring their proposals to the Electric Board for consideration or discussion.
Ms. Bigner said they are in the process of completing a project to look at a green building
program. They are finalizing the roadmap and expect to be implementing something in the next
few months, or early next year at the latest. There are a lot of incentives to have high
performance buildings. This is a complicated process and may have to start with the building
permit. It was suggested that a building permit spokesperson could come to the Electric Board
meeting to discuss changes that have taken place recently to encourage energy conservation.
Another suggestion is that members of the Electric Board could be invited to staff meetings for a
continuation of the discussions on energy conservation. The general consensus from the
discussion is that we should be in on the design phase of building to promote energy
conservation.
Chairperson John Morris asked, due to the time, the underground information be presented at the
next meeting.
Routine Updates
PRPA — Dan Bihn The last meeting of PRPA was exactly three minutes long as they did
not get a quorum until the very last.
Climate Task Force —JeffLebesch The members are expressing several ideas as to what
the City could do for greenhouse gas emissions and voted on those items. The
Brendle group is evaluating the top 25 ideas to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions and
costs. Three things that are likely to be recommended to the task force that affect Fort
Collins Utilities would be rate structure, increasing the rate base charges to fund more
conservation and DSM programs and upping the Energy Supply Policy renewable
allowables.
Capitol News — Steve Wooley No change from last meeting.
10
Electric Board Meeting Minutes
Monday, August 20, 2007
Page 7
Other Business
No other business.
Adiournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
" 7
Joyce Gr z, Electric Boar Secretary
-7-