HomeMy WebLinkAboutDowntown Development Authority - Minutes - 08/06/19980 0
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Regular Directors' Meeting
Kermit Allard, Chair 482-1893 (W)
Chuck Wanner, Council Liaison 484-3014 (W)
Anne Garrison, Staff Liaison 484-2020 (W)
MINUTES OFAUGUST 6, 1998
REGULAR MEETING
The Board of Directors of the Downtown Development Authority met in regular
session at 7:30 a.m. on August 6, 1998 in the Meeting Room at Home State
Bank 303 East Mountain Avenue.
PRESENT There were present:
Kermit Allard, Chair
Mary Brayton, Vice Chair
Greg Belcher, Treasurer
Steve Slezak
Larry Stroud
Margaret Brown
John Pitner
ABSENT Chuck Wanner
Jason Meadors, Secretary
STAFF Chip Steiner, Consultant
Anne Garrison
Lucia Liley, Counsel
GUESTS Jay Hardy, Jim Stouffer, Frank Vaught, Bob Mechels, John Fischbach,
Alan Krcmarik, John Clark, Lance Freeman
CALL TO ORDER Mr. Allard called the meeting to order and roll call was taken.
1i
DDA MINUTES
PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF A motion was made by Mr. Belcher to approve the minutes of July 2, 1998.
MINUTES This was seconded by Ms. Brayton and carried unanimously.
NORTHERN Potential conflicts of interest were declared by Ms. Liley, Counsel for the DDA,
HOTEL and Mr. Stroud. Brad March, a partner in Ms. Liley's law firm, represents Mr.
Mr. Stouffer, buyer of the Nothern Hotel. Mr. Stroud had also held discussions
with Mr. Stouffer with regard to serving as a real estate broker in the
transaction. Both absented the room during the ensuing discussion.
Mr. Allard offered a compromise for this transaction only, that DDA
consider using Jim Martell, thus freeing Mr. Stouffer to retain the services of
Mr. March, who had been his ongoing Counsel on other issues beside this
one. Other Board Members preferred retaining Ms. Liley and asking Mr.
Stouffer to seek new counsel. Mr. Stouffer agreed to speak to Jim Martell,
Mr. Stouffer's plans for the rehabilitation of the building include restoring the
ground floor, in particular, to its original 1930's look, which will include
reworking all plumbing, electrical, heating and sprinklers. Storefronts will be
brought out to the street. The restaurant will remain where it has always
stood. There will be an addition of conference, banquet rooms, and gold suites
together with a 45 room boutique hotel. Mr. Stouffer estimates a project cost of
six million dollars; three and one half to be taken up in renovation costs.
The timetable calls for a real estate closing by the end of the year, which might
be extended into 1999. At this juncture, Mr. Fischbach stated that this project
was fundamental to the future of downtown, and was of great import from the
City standpoint.
The Board felt is was prudent to withhold a dollar commitment until the
contract is finalized. A more complete cost estimate will available in the next
3 - 4 weeks. Mr. Stouffer plans to do a quality project without cutting comers,
but financial assistance is both needed and welcome.
Ms. Brayton then moved to adopt Resolution 98-7 in support of this project,
this was seconded by Mr. Belcher and the motion carried, with Mr. Stroud
abstaining.
ROBERT BISETTI/ Mr. Steiner re -introduced this topic to the Board. He recalled that in an earlier
CHRIS RAY discussion of the proposal two concerns surfaced, namely the number of
PROJECT spaces which would be provided by the new parking ramp, and the need to
recoup DDA's initial investment. Development of the lot would reduce current
parking by over 50 spaces, however, 905 additional spaces will be provided with
the advent of the parking structure. Thus, the question on the table is
whether or not DDA wishes to sell the property. Ms. Brayton felt that it is
incumbent upon the DDA to notify businesses affected by the possible sale of
the lot One way might be to hold a block meeting to advise merchants of the
proposal, hear their opinions, and although these are not necessarily the basis
for a decision, the meeting will serve to inform tenants of development plans.
DDA MINUTES
PAGE 3
Mr. Belcher said that from his perspective, to take a difficult site which is
currently producing little or no property or tax increment increases, and develop
it would seem to be in everyone's best interests, especially with 905 additional
parking spaces only half a block away.
Mr. Slezak feels the proposal is well conceived and thought out However, he
stated, there are more issues at hand. We have not actively tried to market the
property, and downtown space is extremely desirable today. DDA has a fiscal
responsibility to determine its value through an appraisal process. He further
stated that the buyers should underwrite the expense of the appraisal.
Mr. Pitner concurred with the foregoing remarks, stating that he felt the
property was worth a great deal more than imagined.
Ms. Brayton moved to schedule a neighborhood meeting to advise those
interested of the possible development of the Mason Street lot, and
to seek out a fair market value for the property. Mr. Belcher seconded the
motion.
Mr. Stroud observed that it was not necessary to obtain an appraisal,
but simply a market valuation with which the Board is comfortable.
However, Mr. Stroud asked the Board if it was a foregone conclusion that DDA
would sell the land. If that is so, then there should be some format in which it is
made public, so that it is not sold to the first person who comes along.
Mr. Steiner reminded the Board that several months ago it adopted a resolution
in which it was stated that DDA would not entertain other offers on the
property for a period of six months. That period expires in September.
Mr. Slezak suggested that DDA use the next 30 days to set up a neighborhood
meeting, and take time to determine if this is really in the best interests of
downtown, in light of the many projects being undertaken at this time. There
being no further discussion, the motion carried unanimously.
A debate arose regarding the agenda for the neighborhood meeting.
It was felt it should be stated that there is a proposal; that consideration is
being given to the sale of this lot, and it will entail some loss of parking. Some
opposing viewpoints were expressed, those who felt full disclosure of the possible
sale of property should be made, and the highest bidder accepted. Others felt
that if Bisetti and Ray paid fair market value as determined by the Board then
the property should be theirs, since they were the first to approach the Board.
Ms. Liley suggested that following the market analysis, DDA enter into a
contract with Bisetti and Ray which carries various contingencies on items
such as neighborhood meetings, parking analysis, etc., all of these within a
defined timeframe. Then hold the neighborhood meeting and advise that we
have a pending proposal, carrying a number of contingencies which
must be met, one of which is to hold a neighborhood meeting. In this way
the Board is dealing with a 'live' project, and if all contingencies are met
the BisettVRay venture can go forward.
DDA MINUTES
PAGE 4 Ms. Brayton used the foregoing clarification by Counsel to propose a
motion, this was seconded by Mr. Pitner and carried with Mr. Slezak
abstaining. Mr. Allard confirmed for the record, that it was the Board's wish to
rescind the first motion referencing neighborhood meetings.
IGA Ms. Liley explained the changes to this Intergovernmental Agreement,
referring the Board to page 3 of 6, section 3.2. In this paragraph, DDA seeks to
ensure that the continuing commitment to pay $300,000 out of the
tax increment fund as a lease payment, will cease at the time DDA
terminates, which was the original intent, and anticipated to be in the
year 2006. The City's Bond Council had wanted to tie it to annexation
of properties, and some of those were as late as 1990. If the DDA
reinvented itself, or it had other projects, it does not want to have to pay
$300,000 beyond the year 2006. The change will ensure that this obligation will
cease in the year 2006.
Ms. Brayton moved to adopt the amended IGA as presented, and authorize the
Chair to sign accordingly. This was seconded by Mr. Belcher and carried
unanimously.
HORTICULTURAL In his introductory remarks, Mr. Steiner stated that a downtown location is still
CENTER under consideration, along with several other sites. Although DDA has visited
the issue on previous occasions, Jim Clark approached the Board today to
seek its help with the funding of this project.
Addressing site selection, Mr. Clark, accompanied by Mr. Freeman, of the City
Parks and Recreation Board, stated that Lee Martinez Park; a CSU owned site
just below the Holiday Inn; a proposal of land from Front Range Community
College, and the Environmental Learning Center on Prospect are other
considerations.
As part of the information gathering process, and before returning to City
Council in October, costs need to be assessed, particularly as they relate to Lee
Martinez Park. Two hundred thousand has been pencilled in for the land
purchase, this figure could be exceeded if the three properties along North
College are purchased.
Reviewing Resolution 98-6 Mr. Slezak asked if the funding of the Horticultural
Center at a level of $300,000 was feasible, if the Northern Hotel project was
also undertaken. Mr. Steiner took a moment to review the budget projections
and to point out the variables. It was felt that the Board should undertake this
project, and when faced with the next request, respond as is appropriate at that
time.
Ms. Brayton then inquired about a suggestion made previously by Mr. Steiner in
which an ancillary group called Friends of the Horticultural Center would take
over the maintenance and upkeep of Old Town Square, (including
Huckleberry's,) with that entity contributing what is currently being paid for
these services, perhaps with some additional assistance from DDA.
Mr. Belcher then moved to adopt Resolution 98-6 in which DDA agrees to assist
with the funding of this project for up to $300,000. This was seconded by Ms.
Brown. Ms. Brayton would like to see, as part of the Resolution, DDA pursue
DDA MINUTES
PAGE S having the Friends of the Horticultural Center take over the care of the plaza.
Mr. Steiner inquired if the "up to" language should be removed from the
Resolution. After some discussion it was decided to amend the Resolution to
read 'expenditure of $300,000' and delete the term 'up to'. The motion carried
6 - I with Mr. Slezak voting against the proposal.
DDA BUDGET In accordance with the suggestion that the Budget be considered over a period
of two meetings, this will constitute the Board's first reading. Mr. Steiner
provided a brief overview and asked that any comments or suggestions should be
made now, or called through to him at a later time.
BYLAW CHANGES Mr. Steiner referred to the changes suggested, which were to strike the
requirement for a seal because we do not have one; strike clause in Article 2,
section 2.3 on Vacancies; which reads 'nominated by the Authority for term
extension.' Change term of officers from one to two years; limiting the term in
office to one term, a person cannot serve two consecutive terms; Secretary and
Treasurer positions may be filled by one person, change the Bylaws to allow the
Authority to contract for Management Services as well as to hire an Executive
Director; current open meeting language is changed to conform to current
statute on open meetings. Omitted are the bonding requirements which need to
be waived, and signing off on payment authorizations, this either needs the
signature of the Treasurer or authorization for Anne Garrison to sign them.
Mr. Steiner suggests these be brought back in September, to allow him time to
add the omitted areas.
OTHER BUSINESS Due to time constraints, Mr. Allard requested that reports from Ms. Brown and
Mr. Belcher who attended a FEMA meeting as representatives of the DDA, be
received at the next meeting.
ADJOURN There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 9:50 a.m.
Jason Meadors, Secretary