Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZoning Board Of Appeals - Minutes - 05/31/2007Karla Smith - AR-M35O_2OO7O724 121839.pdf page 1 FORT COLLINS BUILDING REVIEW BOARD Regular Meeting —May 31, 2067 A regular meeting of the Building Review Board was held on Thursday, May 31, 2007 in the Comicil Chambers of the Fort Collins Municipal Building at 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. PRESENT. David Carr Alan Cram Mike Gust Gene Little Jim Packard Michael Smille, Chair George Smith ABSENT: None STAFF M ROERS PRESENT: Felix Lee, Neighborhood & Building Services Director Delyna Coldimn, Contractor Licensing & Admin Services Coordinator AGENDA: L ROLLCALL The meeting was called to order. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Carr made a motion to approve the minutes from the March 29, 2001 meeting. Cram seconded the motion. The motion passel 3. Army Rex, d/h/a Rex General Contracting: Lee introduced this appeal. He noted that the appellant curtmttly has a Class D2 license which allows him to perform the following: "to construct residential garages not exceeding one thousand (1,000) square feet in total floor area; to construct additions which do not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet of floor area; and to perform any struchnal alterations, demolitions and/or repaus, to any building or structure in the City classified by the building code as a Group R, Division 3 occupancy housing not more then two (2) dwelling units, or a Group U, Division I occupancy. A Class D2 general contractor license holder is also suf urrind, permitted to do any work allowed Karla Smith - AR-M350_20070724 121839.pdf Page 2 RRB May 31, 2007 Pg. 2 under the miscellaneous and minor structures specialized trade contractor license (to construct, repair, or demolish (a) detached structures such as sheltors, storage sleds, playhouses, greenhouses, and gazebos; and (b) unenelosed structures such as open carports, patio covers, open pouches, and declo;. Any such work is further limited to one story buildings or structures trot exceeding two hundred (200) square feet in floor area and which contain occupancies limited to those classified by the building code as Group R, Division 3; Group S, Divisions ] and 2; and Group U other than privata)," Lee noted that the appellant has the opportunity to perform the following projects: 1) 420 N. Grant— Construct two new single family homes: The appellant owns this property and has an existing house that currently sits on two lots. He would like to demo the existing house and rebuild a single family dwelling on each of the two lots. 2) 240 E Mountain —Office remodel. This project entails adding a bathroom, installing some new windows, installing two new exterior doors, adding a new beating system, new electric and the installation of new work stations. Lee added that the appellant earlier obtained permission from the Board to build an addition to 1122 W Mountain Avenue which exceeded the limitations of appellant's license and stated that the project is currently underway. All otherprojacts on record for the appellant have been completed without incident The Board heard testimony from the appellant, Andy Rex. After closing statements, the Board discussed the information that was presented Corr made a motion to approve both project exemptions requested. Smilie seconded the motion. A friendly amendment was suggested by Smilie that would require the appellant to take and pass the City's DI exam prior to starting the 420 N. Grant project Carr accepted the amendment. Vote: Yeas: Can, Packard, Little, Smilia Cram, Smith and Gust Nays: None David Martinez, dthla MM Remodeling: Lee introduced this appeal. He stared that the appellant was in the process of applying for a D2 license and supervisor eerdfim a and that according to the City's licensing requirements, to qualify for a Class D2 license or supervisor certificate, so applicant most have constructed or supervised the construction of three (3) completed projects, each with a construction value of not less than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.) and each of which entails the significant structural alteration of or the addition to a single-family home or equivalent structure as determined by the Building Official. Lee exph»ned that because the appellant's company performs only residential finish work,, lie was unable to provide documentation on projects that sm sufficient to qualify for an unrestricted D2 license. Tlterefory according to Lee, the appellant was seeking a limited D2 license that would enable him to perform non-structural residential finish work Lee nosed that the appellant wokthe City's D2 exam on April 5, 2007 and scored a 75%, The Board heard testimony from the appellant, David Martinez. After closing statements, the Board discussed the information that had been presented. Karla Smith - AR-M350 20070724 121839.pdf Page 3 BRB May 31, 2007 Pg.3 Smilie made a motion to approve a D2 Go mse limited to residential finish work Packard seconded the motion.. Vote: Yeas: Carr, Packard, Little, 5mille, Cram, Smith and Gust Nays: None 6. Other Business Lee provided an update on IBC and Propetiy Maintenance Code offorts currently underway. Meeting adjourned at 2:13 p.m. Pea Lee, Ne od & Building Services Mike Smilie, Board Chair Director