HomeMy WebLinkAboutLiquor Licensing Authority - Minutes - 02/08/1978Liquor Licensing Authority
Regular Meeting - February 8, 1978
7:30 p.m.
A regular meeting of the Liquor Licensing Authority was held on Wednesday,
February 8, 1978, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City of Fort
Collins Municipal Building. Roll call was answered by the following
members: Bean, Long, Renz, Seegmiller and Wilson.
Staff members present: Sgt. Bob Mason, Police Department
Wanda Krajicek, Deputy City Clerk
Also: Assistant City Attorney Ramsey Myatt
Minutes of the regular meeting of
January 11, 1978, approved as
published
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Renz,
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 11, 1978, as
published. The Chairman put the motion which was unanimously adopted.
The Chairman read the hearing procedured at length before proceeding
with the final hearing.
Final hearing on a Hotel -Restaurant
application submitted by Kay Frazee
dba Little Tokyo Cafe, 1801 N. College Ave.,
application approved.
The resolution setting forth the findings of the preliminary hearing and
establishing the boundaries was read by title only as a complete copy
had been furnished to each Authority member with the agenda.
Authority member Bean made a motion, seconded by Authority member Renz,
to adopt the Resolution. The Chairman put the motion which was unanimously
adopted.
RESOLUTION
OF THE LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY OF FORT
COLLINS SETTING FORTH FINDINGS ON A PRELIMIN-
ARY HEARING ON A LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION
WHEREAS, heretofore, Kay Frazee, doing business as
Little Tokyo Cafe, 1801 North College Avenue, Fort Collins,
Colorado, made application to the Liquor Licensing Authority
for a Hotel -Restaurant Liquor License; and
WHEREAS, the Liquor Licensing Authority has received
reports concerning such applications, and.has held a prelim-
inary hearing on such application as provided in Rule 3 of
the Rules of Procedure of the Liquor Licensing Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LIQUOR LICENSING
AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, that the Authority
hereby makes the following preliminary findings and determin-
ations concerning this application, subject to the right of
any party in interest to present further evidence concerning
any of such findings and determinations at the hearing to be
held on this application on the 8th day of February, 1978:
1. That the subject premises are proper premises under
the ordinances of the City of Fort Collins and the laws of
the State of Colorado to be licensed for the sale of liquor
as applied for by the applicant.
2. That the boundaries of the neighborhood to be
served by this applicant are as follows:
North from the subject premises to the City limits;
West from the subject premises to the City limits,
following the City limits southerly to Shields Street;
then South on Shields Street to Mountain Avenue; South
from the subject premises to Mountain Avenue extended
to meet Eastern City limits; East from the subject
premises to City limits following City limits southerly
to Mountain Avenue extended.
The boundaries of the neighborhood include both sides
of all streets named as boundary streets, as long as both
sides are within the City limits.
3. That the necessary notice of hearing by publication
and by posting of the premises has not been given as provided
by law, and the Authority has directed the City Clerk to
accomplish said notice prior to the hearing date.
502!
4. That the applicant is qualified under the ordinances
of the City and the laws of the State for the license applied
s.
for. I
5. That the application is in proper form and will'be
heard by the Authority on February 8, 1978.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Liquor
Licensing Authority held this 8th day of February, 1978.
ATTEST:
City�erClerk )
Mr. William Beardslee, attorney for the applicant, Kay Frazee, called
Ms. Frazee, 1818 Valley View Lane, as his first witness. Ms. Frazee was
duly sworn before giving testimony relating to her previous work experience,
her knowledge of the liquor laws and the type of menu that is available
at her establishment. She noted that she had moved to the United States
in 1960, and that she had purchased her business in January of 1970.
Mr. Beardslee explained to the Authority that the deficiencies found by
the Fire Department and the Building Inspection Department have been
corrected and that the restaurant was scheduled for reinspection the next
day(2-9-78).
Mr. Beardslee presented petitions marked as applicant's exhibit A,
containing 222 signatures, that Ms. Frazee had circulated among the customers
and patrons of her restaurant.
Mr. Beardslee called Mr. Raymond K. Van de Venter, 1108 Stover, as his next
witness. Mr. Van de Venter was duly sworn before giving testimony. He
stated that he was a family friend of Ms. Frazee and that he had circulated
petitions at her request on her behalf. His petitions marked applicant's
exhibits B and C, were of two types: one to residents of the boundary area
and one to owners and employees of businesses in the area and that they
contained 151 and 196 signatures respectively. He estimated that approxi-
mately 10% of the persons that he had encountered had refused to sign for
various reasons.
-3-
Mr. Beardslee asked that the license be granted contingent upon the final
inspection by the Fire Department and Building Inspection Department.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Bean, to
approve the license subject to the conditions set forth above. The Chairman
put the motion which was unanimously adopted.
Final hearing on an application for a
Tavern license submitted by Ben -Car
Corporation dba Spring Creek Runoff,
1006 Spring Creek Lane; preliminary
Resolution adopted and license granted.
RESOLUTION
OF THE LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY OF FORT
COLLINS SETTING FORTH FINDINGS ON A PRELIMIN-
ARY HEARING ON A LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION
WHEREAS, heretofore, Ben -Car Corporation, doing business
as Spring Creek Runoff, Ltd., made application to the Liquor
Licensing Authority for a Tavern Liquor License; and
WHEREAS, the Liquor Licensing Authority has received
reports concerning such applications, and has held a prelim-
inary hearing on such applicatio as provided in Rule 3 of
the Rules of Procedure of the L' r Licensing Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE O D BY THE LIQUOR LICENSING
F;
AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FORT LLINS, that the Authority
hereby makes the following.,jpreliminary findings and determin-
ations concerning this ap 'cation, subject to the right of
any party in interest to p esent further evidence concerning
any of such findings and determinations at the hearing to be
held on this application on the 8th day of February, 1978:
-4-
•
C�
1. That the subject premises are not proper premises
under the ordinances of the City of Fort Collins for the
sale of liquor as applied for by the applicant because of
the zoning of the premises, to -wit: B-P Planned Business
District.
Because of
application is hereby
February 8, 1978 i
Passed
s set forth hereinabove, the
sed and the hearing date of
ted.
adopted at a regular meeting of the
Liquor Licensi Authority held this 8th day of February,
1978.
ATTEST:
r�v
City Clerkl���y
Mr. John Reid, attorney representing the applicants, stated that he had
a copy of the Resolution and that he and his clients had been surprised at the
action the City had taken since a report from the Zoning Department that
the zoning was proper does appear in the applicant's file. He asked that
the Authority amend or deny the Resolution as presented and that he be
permitted to proceed with their evidence since the question of zoning
should not be a consideration of the Liquor Licensing Authority but
should be decided by Council or Zoning Board of Appeals.
Chairman Seegmiller stated that he felt denying the Resolution would be
making a zoning decision whereas he felt Council was asking the Authority
to adopt the Resolution and administratively remand the matter back to
Council for them to decide.
Mr. Reid suggested that the Authority proceed with the hearing and make
a decision and if the license is granted, make it subject to having the
zoning issue clarified by Council or whatever body should do it.
Mr. Myatt stated that the City Attorney's office had prepared the Resolut-
ion in its present wording on the basis that the Council had determined
that the premises were not proper because of the zoning. The Administration
had already filed their routine slip indicating that the B-P zone was
-5-
acceptable prior to that decision by Council.
Mr. Reid stated that the verbatim copy of the January 31, 1978 Council
meeting showed that the Council directed the City Attorney to draw up
possible alternatives as to where a tavern rightly belongs and possibly
to enact an ordinance at a later date but that no specific action was
taken by Council to authorize the Authority to deny the license on the
basis of zoning. He asked that the verbatim transcript be admitted into
evidence and marked as applicant's exhibit 37.
Authority member Bean stated that he felt that the Council was asking the
Authority to stall this application until they could ordinance it out of
existance. Several Authority members expressed agreement.
Authority member Bean made a motion, seconded by Authority member Renz,
torefuse to adopt the Resolution. The Chairman put the motion which
resulted in the following vote: Yeas: Bean, Renz, and Wilson. Nays:
Long and Seegmiller. The motion carried.
The original Resolution prepared by the City Attorney's office was read
in its entirety by Chairman Seegmiller.
Authority member Bean made a motion, seconded by Authority member Renz
to approve the Resolution as read. The Chairman put the motion with
the following vote: Yeas: Bean, Long, Renz, and Wilson. Nays: Seegmiller.
The motion carried.
RESOLUTION
OF THE LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY OF FORT
COLLINS SETTING FORTH FINDINGS ON A PRELIMIN-
ARY HEARING ON A LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION
WHEREAS, heretofore, Ben -Car Corporation, doing business
as Spring Creek Runoff, Ltd., made application to the Liquor
Licensing Authority for a Tavern Liquor License; 'and
WHEREAS, the Liquor Licensing Authority has received
reports concerning such applications, and has held a prelim-
inary hearing on such application as provided in Rule 3 of
the Rules of Procedure of the Liquor Licensing Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LIQUOR LICENSING
AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, that the Authority
hereby makes the following preliminary,findings and determin-
ations concerning this application, subject to the right of
any party in interest to present further evidence concerning
any of such findings and determinations at the hearing to be
held on this application on the 8th day of February, 1978:
1. That the subject premises are proper premises under
the ordinances of the City of Fort Collins and the laws of
the State of Colorado to be licensed for the sale of liquor
as applied for by the applicant.
2. That the boundaries of the neighborhood to be
served by this applicant are as follows:
South from the subject premises to the City limits;
West from the subject premises to the City limits;
North from the subject premises to Mulberry Street; and
East from the subject premises to College Avenue.
The boundaries of the neighborhood include both sides
of all streets named as boundary streets, as long as both
sides are within the City limits.
3. That the necessary notice of hearing by publication
and by posting of the premises has not been given as provided
by law, and the Authority has directed the City Clerk to
accomplish said notice prior to the hearing date.
4. That the applicant is qualified under the ordinances
of the City and the laws of the State for the license applied
for.
o,
5. That the application is in proper form and will be
heard by the Authority on February 8, 1978.
-7-
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Liquor
Licensing Authority held this
`ATTEST:
City Clerk `
8th day of February, 1978.
Uf
Chairman
Mr. Reid called Mr. Dale Carlson, 1805 Sheely Drive, as his first witness.
Mr. Carlson was duly sworn before giving testimony relative to his educa-
tion and work experience. He described the building in which the proposed
Spring Creek Runoff would be housed and stated that their lease would
be for 2,000 sq. ft. area and would seat 54 people. Mr. Carlson noted
that their establishment is being planned to offer delicatessen sandwiches
and various side dishes and that they hoped to make it a place where
people could see their neighbors. They hope it will attract clientele
in the 26-45 age range and that they will offer a quiet atmosphere that
will probably not appeal to the college age group. There will be no
pinball, pool or foosball tables, but there will be boards for chess or
checkers built into the table tops, backgammon and darts which probably
won't appeal to college kids. There will be no jukebox, but there will
be taped music.
Mr. Reid presented applicant's exhibit 2 which was a floor plan of the
proposed establishment . These showed the seating arrangement, office
area, storeroom and restrooms. These were entered into evidence.
Mr. Carlson stated that his partner, Mr. Benzel would manage the estab-
lishment and that he(Mr. Carlson) would be responsible for the paperwork
i.e. the quarterly reports, sales tax returns, payroll, the books,
financial statements and that he would also help out as needed in running
the place. Mr. Carlson stated that he estimated $40,000 would be needed
to furnish and operate this business, that would be acquired by borrowing
from their parents.
Mr. Reid then presented petitions marked as applicant's exhibits 2-6
which Mr. Carlson had circulated containing 184 signatures. Mr. Carlson
estimated that 25 had refused to sign, citing various reasons, the most
predominant being religious.
Mr. Reid's next witness was Mr. Robert C. Benzel, 1110 E. Lincoln, who
was duly sworn before giving testimony. Mr. Benzel gave testimony as to
the length of residency in Fort Collins and gave his concept of the nature
of the business proposed. He stated that his parents had owned the
Hauf Brau for 24 years and that he had increased his responsibilities as he
grew up, finally becoming the manager after he had tended bar for a
number of years.
Mr. Reid presented petitions marked as applicant's exhibits 7-19 which
were circulated by Mr. Benzel and containing approximately 500 signatures.
Mr. Benzel estimated that approximately 50-60 persons had declined to sign
for various reasons.
Mr. Reid next called Renee Benzel, 1607 Edora Road, who was duly sworn
and presented petitions marked as applicant's exhibits 20-22 containing
52 signatures. She estimated 15 persons had declined to sign.
Eileen Zelasko, 420 Wood Street, was Mr. Reid's next witness. She was
duly sworn and presented petitions marked as applicant's exhibits 23-33
containing an estimated 400-500 signatures. Approximately 70 refused to
sign her petitions.
Mr. Reid then called Mary Harris, 230 Park St., who was duly sworn and
presented petitions marked applicants exhibits 34-36 containing 94
signatures. She estimated 20% declined to sign her petitions.
Mr. Reid asked if any others present wished to make a statement in support
of this license. Those coming forward were:
Delmer Baird, 1643 Independence Road
Jim Burns, 1501 Briarwood
Mr. Reid asked that those in the audience in support of the granting of
the license stand. He then asked that the record reflect that approxi-
mately two dozen stood in favor.
Margaret Reeves, 1931 Sandalwood, was duly sworn before giving testimony
in opposition to the granting of this license. She stated that it was
her opinion that a tavern would tend to bring in traffic from Shields
Street. She stated that she knew that there were people from the neigh-
borhood opposed to the granting of this license although they didn't
feel that it was necessary to come out.
In closing, Mr. Reid asked that the Authority grant the license on the
basis of the testimony given and on the basis of the more than 1,200
signatures of the neighborhood residents on the petitions presented.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Bean,
that based on the evidence presented, no reason exists not to approve the
application and he therefore moved that the Authority approve the applica-
tion for a tavern license for Spring Creek Runoff "contingent upon
the City Council determining whether or not they have a zoning problem."
The Chairman put the motion which resulted in the following vote:
Yeas: Bean, Long, Renz, and Wilson. Nays: Seegmiller.
Preliminary hearing on the Beer and
Wine license application submitted by
Chung -Yuen Chan dba Oriental House,
2900 Harvard, boundaries recommended
by the Administration adopted.
The boundaries recommended by the Administration were as follows:
North from the subject premises to Prospect,
West from the subject premises to Shields,
South from the subject premises to City limits and
East from the subject premises to Lemay Avenue.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Renz,
to accept the boundaries as recommended by the Administration and set
the final hearing date for March 8. The Chairman put the motion which
was unanimously adopted. (Bean out of the room).
Change of ownership at the Brothers,
249 South College, to Antonios Katapodis
and change of trade name to The Greek
Connection, approved.
Mr. William Beardslee, attorney for the transferee, Mr. Antonios D.
Katapodis, 515 East Drake, introduced Mr. Katapodis who was duly sworn.
Mr. Katapodis told the Authority of his background, stating that he
was born on the island Lefkos, Greece and came to the United States 5 1/2
years ago. He stated he had purchased the restaurant from BSH Corporation
and he was now the owner and manager and had changed the name to The
Greek Connection.
Mr. Beardslee then called Spiro Palmer, 801 Tyler, owner of Palmer
House Florist. Mr. Palmer stated that he had known Mr. Katapodis for 15
years and that at various times Mr. Katapodis had been an employee and
business partner of his.
Authority member Bean made a motion, seconded by Authority member Long,
to approve the transfer. The Chairman put the motion which was unanimously
adopted.
Transfer of ownership of the outlet at
132 Laporte Avenue to Grand American Fare
and; Registration of new manager, Alan B.
Christian
Mr. David Osborn, attorney, introduced Alan B. Christian, 1150 Lehigh,
Boulder, the manager of the proposed outlet. Mr. Christian stated that
he had appeared before the Authority 2 years ago in connection with the
liquor license that was approved then. He noted that he has been
running the Dark Horse Restaurant in Boulder for the past 2 years.
Mr. Osborn explained that this transfer was taking place because a
change in statutes now allows corporations to hold more than one license.
Colorado Fare is a subsidiary of Grand American Fare.
Authority member Renz made a motion, seconded by Authority member Long,
to approve the transfer subject to the filing of a trade name affidavit
before the issuance of the license. The Chairman put the motion which
was unanimously adopted.
-10-
Change of corporate status at
the Catacombs, 115 South College Ave.
Mr. David Osborn, attorney, stated that Nico Zentveld had acquired
100% of the corporation stock of Unicorn Corporation dba Catacombs, and
was now the sole owner.
Authority member Bean made a motion, seconded by Authority member Long,
to approve the change of corporate status of Unicorn Corporation. The
Chairman put the motion which was unanimously adopted.
Renewals for:
Safeway Stores, 106 E. Foothills Parkway
Robinhood Restaurant, 215 E. Foothills Parkway
Sams. 158-162 Linden
Panhandlers, 607 S. Mason
Seven -Eleven, 216 W. Prospect.
Authority member Bean made a motion, seconded by Authority member Renz,
to approve the above renewal applications. The Chairman put the motion
which was unanimously adopted.
Letter of Reprimand for
Sam's 158-162 Linden
Sgt. Mason described an alleged sale to a minor violation at Sam's and
asked the Authority to direct the City Attorney to write a letter of
reprimand to them.
Authority member Bean made a motion, seconded by Authority member Renz, to
to direct the City Attorney's office to prepare a letter of reprimand to
Sam's Old Town Ballroom, 158-162 Linden. The Chairman put the motion
which was unanimously adopted.
Resolution adopted granting the
Retail Liquor Store license
submitted by M. W. and Shirley Kurtz
dba Spring Creek Liquors, 1005 W. Stuart.
The resolution was read by title only as each Authority member had been
furnished a copy with the agenda.
FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION
OF THE LOCAL LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, CONCERNING AN
APPLICATION FOR A RETAIL LIQUOR STORE LICENSE
The application of Martin Winfred Kurtz and Shirley J.
Kurtz, doing business as Spring Creek Liquors, for a Retail
Liquor Store License came on for hearing on the llth day of
-11-
January, 1978, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, Fort
Collins, Colorado, pursuant to notice duly given as required
by law.
The Authority, having heard the evidence introduced at
the hearing, and having examined the documents introduced
and having heretofore held a preliminary hearing and issued
findings in writing on said preliminary hearing, now makes
the following findings:
1. The neighborhood to be served under this application
is as defined in the preliminary findings of the Authority.
2. Nothing contained in C.R.S., 1973, Section 12-47-138
prohibits the issuing of a license at the proposed location.
3. The applicants are of good character and qualified
under the Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins and the
laws of the State of Colorado for the license applied for.
4. The application is in proper form.
5. Petitions containing substantial numbers of signatures
and evidence were presented and received at the hearing,
indicating a need for the license applied for and, although
petitions containing substantial numbers of signatures and
evidence were presented and received at the hearing indicating
that said need does not exist, the local licensing authority
hereby finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighbor-
hood require the issuance of the license applied for. The
Authority recognizes that other licenses exist in the
neighborhood, but hereby finds that an additional need
exists for the license applied for.
-12-
6. The building in which the license is to be operated
is not now constructed; and no license should issue until
the construction is completed in accordance with the plans
and specifications submitted by the applicant and the require-
ments of the Building Inspector made iD conformity with the
Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins.
RESOLUTION
OF THE LOCAL LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, CONCERNING AN
APPLICATION FOR A RETAIL LIQUOR STORE LICENSE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Local Liquor Licensing Authority
of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado that the application
of Martin Winfred Kurtz and Shirley J. Kurtz, doing business
as Spring Creek Liquors, for a Retail Liquor Store License
be and the same hereby is granted in accordance with the
findings of the Authority set forth above; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said license shall not
issue until the construction of the licensed premises is
completed in accordance with the plans and specifications
submitted to the Authority and the requirements of the City
Building Inspector, and the Authority has received a report
from said Building Inspector that said improvements have
been completed in accordance with said plans and specifica-
tions and the requirements of the Building Inspector.
Passed and adopted this 8th day of February, A.D. 1978.
4165_'�
Chairman
ATTEST:
City Clerk
eR� Ra
-13-
Authority member Bean made a motion, seconded by Authority member Renz,
to adopt the Resolution as presented. The Chairman put the motion which
was unanimously adopted.
Other Business
The Authority directed the City Attorney to write a letter to the license
holder at T.J.'s, 142 Linden, informing them that they must come before
the Authority for permission to modify the premises.
Authority member Bean made a motion, seconded by Authority member Wilson,
to direct the City Attorney to write the above letter. The Chairman put the
motion which was unanimously adopted.
Police Report
Sgt. Mason stated that the show/cause hearing for Panhandlers had been
withdrawn due to a change in testimony by the two juveniles involved.
Authority member Wilson asked if in the future, each Authority member
could be responsible for a certain portion of the petitions submitted
by each applicant in order to speed up the examination of the signatures.
The Authority agreed to try this approach.
Adjournment
Authority member Long, made a motion,
adjourn the meeting. The Chairman put
adopted.
The meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
Deputy City Clerk�—
seconded by Authority member Renz, to
the motion which was unanimously
-14-