HomeMy WebLinkAboutLiquor Licensing Authority - Minutes - 09/14/1983• 0
LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY
Regular Meeting - September 14, 1983
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Liquor Licensing Authority was held on Wednesday,
September 14, 1983, in the Council Chambers of the City of Fort Collins
Municipal Building. Roll call was answered by the following members:
Acott, Long, Monaghan, Sheahan, Veazie and Wilson.
(Secretary's Note: Authority member Veazie arrived approximately 7:40
p.m.)
Authority members Absent: Bujack
Staff Members Present: Debbie Caster, City Clerk's Office
Kathy Allin, City Attorney's Office
Frank Russell, Police Department
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 17, 1983,
and the Special Meeting of August 29, 1983,
Approved as Published
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Monaghan,
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of August 17, 1983, and the
special meeting of August 29, 1983, as published.
(Secretary's Note: Authority member Acott abstained from voting on the
August 29 special meeting minutes).
The Chairperson put the motion with the following votes: Yeas: Long,
Monaghan, Sheahan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None. Abstain: Acott.
Special Events Permit
Fort Town, September 24, 1983
Ms. Jane Van Velson, events manager, stated Fort Town is sponsoring an
International Festival on September 24, 1983, in conjunction with the CSU
International Poster Exhibition. She explained that several clubs and
organizations throughout the community will participate. Craft booths,
food, beer and dancing will be provided. Ms. Van Velson stated the event
will take place at the Oak Street Plaza from 12 noon to 8 p.m. She noted
that the area will be roped off for security reasons. It was also noted
that there will be three people on duty at all times who will be respon-
sible for checking ID's, stamping hands, etc. Ms. Van Velson stated ID's
will be requested of those eo le 1 oki d
p p o ng un er the age of 18.
-2- September 14, 1983
Authority member Monaghan made a motion, seconded by Authority member
Long, to approve the special events permit for Fort Town on September 24,
1983, from 12 noon to 8 p.m. Yeas: Acott, Long, Monaghan, Sheahan and
Wilson. Nays: None.
Transfer of Ownership
Spring Creek Liquors, 1005 West Stuart #A-3
Ms. Shirley David, 614 Miller Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado, was sworn and
spoke briefly of her background. Ms. David stated she has had no prior
experience in the retail liquor business. She stated she will be the
owner/manager of the store and noted that her hours will run from 9 a.m. to
approximately 7 p.m. Ms. David stated male employees will run the store
during the evening .hours until closing. In response to a question by the
Board, Ms. David stated she is familiar with the Colorado Liquor Laws.
With regard to training, Ms. David explained that she will be keeping
employees who have worked at the store and who are already trained. She
noted that anyone looking under the age of 35 years will be checked for an
ID.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Acott, to
approve the transfer of ownership from Elizabeth to Shirley A. David, 1005
West Stuart #A-3. Yeas: Acott, Long, Monaghan, Sheahan, and Wilson.
Nays: None. Abstain: Veazie.
Preliminary Hearing for a
Hotel -Restaurant License for
Scoreboard Bar and Grill, 2160 West Drake Road
At the request of Bill Edmiston, owner, the application for a hotel -
restaurant license at Scoreboard Bar and Grill, 2160 West Drake Road, has
been withdrawn.
Final Hearing for a 3.2%
Fermented Malt Beverage (Class A) License for
Buffie's, 524 West Laurel
Mr. Michael Chapleau, was sworn, and stated he is the president of Buf-
fie's, Inc., who is the applicant for the 3.2% license. Mr. Chapleau
stated he is proposing to open a speciality sandwich shop located at 524
West Laurel Street. He stated he would like to obtain the beer license for
on premise consumption only. Mr. Chapleau explained that the building will
be known as Laurel Street Station and that it will have other uses, such as
-3-
September 14, 1983
a dry cleaning store, beauty parlor, office space, etc. He stated Buffie's
will provide seating for approximately 50 people. He noted that there
will be a small outdoor deck. The restaurant is scheduled to open mid to
late October. Mr. Chapleau stated the restaurant will be open seven
days a week. At midnight, he stated the restaurant will close but carry-
out will be available from a walk-up window until 2 a.m. He noted that no
beer will be allowed to be carried out after midnight.
In response to a question by the Board, Mr. Chapleau explained that the
deck area will be enclosed by a rail 5 feet above ground. He stated that
if there is a problem with drinks being passed over the rail, additional
rails will be added on top of the existing rail. He stated that it will be
the responsibility of the waitresses to supervise the deck area.
Mr. Chapleau submitted Applicant's Exhibit 1, which was identified as
petitions circulated among residential and business areas within the
defined neighborhood. Mr. Chapleau stated the petitions were circulated by
his assistant. He stated approximately 250 signatures were received. He
explained that very few people refused to sign the petitions. Mr. Chapleau
stated those people refused to sign for religious reasons.
Mr. Chapleau stated he will employ approximately 22 employees, the ma-
jority of which will be part-time students. He stated he and his assistant
will be responsible for training all employees. He explained that each
employee will be provided a service manual which will explain all policies,
as well as the Colorado Beer Laws. Mr. Chapleau noted that he has not yet
been able to obtain the Colorado Beer Code but will be receiving one in the
near future. He assured the Authority that he will familiarize himself
with the laws. In closing, Mr. Chapleau stated he had a restaurant opera-
tion in Indiana and never received a violation.
Authority member Monaghan made a motion, seconded by Authority member Long,
to approve the 3.2% fermented malt beverage license, Class A, to Buffie's,
Inc., dba Buffie's, 524 West Laurel. Yeas: Acott, Long, Monaghan, Sheahan,
Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Final Resolution on a 3.2%
Fermented Malt Beverage (Class A) License for
Buffie's, 524 West Laurel
The Resolution was read by title only.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Monaghan,
to adopt the Resolution as presented. Yeas: Acott, Long, Monaghan, Sheahan,
Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
-4- September 14, 1983
Final Hearing for a
Beer and Wine License for
Joe's Fireside Cafe, 311 South College Avenue
The Resolution outlining the results of the preliminary hearing was read by
title only.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Acott,
to adopt the Resolution as presented: Yeas: Acott, Long, Monaghan,
Sheahan, Veazie, and Wilson. Nays: None.
Mr. Joseph Ierisi was sworn and stated he is the owner of Joe's Fireside
Cafe. He stated he is open 7 days a week for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
The hours are from 6:30 a.m. to 2 p.m. and from 4 p.m. to 9 p.m. He noted
that the seating capacity is approximately 44. Mr. Ierisi stated his
business caters primarily to the downtown business community and residents
in the immediate neighborhood. He pointed out that there is only one other
beer and wine license located in the defined neighborhood area. Mr. Ierisi
stated he has applied for a beer and wine license because he feels it will
complement his menu. Mr. Ierisi stated he has approximately 15 years
experience in the restaurant business. He noted that his waitresses are
experienced and are all over the age of 21 years. He also noted that
drinks will be served with meals and that he does not intend to run a
bar.
Mr. Ierisi submitted Applicant's Exhibit 1 which was identified as peti-
tions circulated on behalf of the application. Applicant's Exhibit 2 was
submitted and identified as a receipt from Gibson's Heating and Air Condi-
tioning to prove that improvements have been made to the hood exhaust
system as required by the Fire Department. Mr. Ierisi noted that the
majority of people contacted favored the granting of the license. He noted
that six to ten people declined to sign the petition for religious reasons.
He stated the individuals who circulated the petitions received signatures
from the neighborhood as well as from customers in the restaurant. It was
noted that approximately 326 were received in the restaurant and 200 from
the neighborhood area.
Mr. Ierisi stated he has had difficulty in obtaining the Colorado Liquor
Code from the State. He stated he expects to receive one soon and that he
will familiarize himself and his employees with the laws. Mr. Ierisi stated
he intends to obtain an ID Guide booklet to assist employees in checking
for ID's.
Authority member Long stated he is concerned with the fact that the ma-
jority of signatures were received in the restaurant, as opposed to
residents in the neighborhood.
-5-
September 14, 1983
Authority member Acott made a motion, seconded by Authority member Mon-
aghan, to approve the beer and wine license for Joe's Fireside Cafe, 311
South College Avenue. Yeas: Acott, Monaghan, Sheahan, Veazie and Wilson.
Nays: Long.
Final Resolution on a
Beer and Wine License for
Joe's Fireside Cafe, 311 South College Avenue
The Resolution was read by title only.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Monaghan,
to adopt the Resolution as presented. Yeas: Acott, Long, Monaghan, Shea-
han, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: Nono.
Final Hearing for a
Retail Liquor Store License for
Ace Liquors, 238 East Mountain Avenue
The Resolution outlining the results of the preliminary hearing was read by
title only.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Veazie,
to adopt the Resolution as presented: Yeas: Acott, Long, Monaghan,
Sheahan, Veazie, and Wilson. Nays: None.
Mr. David Power, attorney representing the applicant, stated that Mr. Sea
is the current manager of Ace Liquors and is applying for the transfer of
ownership. He explained that the liquor store will be moving down the
block, therefore Mr. Seo is also applying for the transfer of location.
Mr. Young Weon Seo, general manager, was sworn and spoke briefly of his
background. Mr. Seo stated he worked for 2 years in his brother's liquor
store in Baltimore, MD. He stated his duties included stocking shelves and
checking ID's. Mr. Seo stated his current duties at Ace Liquors include
inventory, ordering, stocking shelves and checking for ID's. He stated the
owner, Mr. Bryan Lee, is not actively involved in the day-to-day operation.
It was noted that there will be no changes in operation if the license is
transferred.
Applicant's Exhibit 1A was submitted and identified as petitions signed by
residents, business establishments and customers of the store. Mr. Seo
stated he personally circulated the petitions. He stated some people
refused to sign the petitions.
-6- September 14, 1983
Ms. Kathy Allin, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the petitions contain
incomplete signatures. In addition, she noted that some pages have been
notarized but do not indicate the person who circulated the petitions. Ms.
Allin also pointed out that blank petitions have been signed by Mr. Seo and
notarized. Ms. Allin suggested that the Authority disregard all of the
pages which are incomplete or not in proper form.
Mr. Seo stated that approximately 2 months ago a violation occurred at Ace
Liquors involving a sale to a minor. He stated he and his wife have taken
a seminar in Denver which covered the liquor laws and the process for
checking ID's. Mr. Seo also indicated that notices have been posted in the
store to help remind employees to check for ID's. It was noted that he
will employ his wife and one other person.
Applicants Exhibit 1B was submitted and identified as a summary of the
petitions previously submitted. Applicants Exhibit 2 was submitted and
identified as a letter from Eugene Mitchell in support of the change in
location.
Mr. Power stated he feels it has been shown that there is adequate need
for the license to be located at 238 East Mountain Avenue.
The Authority stated their concern with the difficulty Mr. Seo has in
communicating in the English language.
In response to a question from the Authority, Mr. Seo stated some people
refused to sign the petition because they dislike signing petitions of any
kind. He stated that no one ever stated they objected to the store moving
from 200 East Mountain to 238 East Mountain. Mr. Seo stated that when he
is checking for ID's, he will often request someone's signature to compare
it against the signature on the driver's license.
Authority member Acott noted that out of 350 signatures, only 58 were from
the neighborhood area. She stated she feels the percentage of people
notified in the residential area is too small. Authority member Long
concurred.
Mr. David Power was sworn in order to give testimony regarding a letter
from Mr. Eugene Mitchell submitted as Applicant's Exhibit 2. Mr. Power
stated Mr. Bryan Lee (current owner) subleases the premises known as Ace
Liquors, 200 East Mountain, from Vincent Chung, who leases the building
from Eugene Mitchell. Mr. Power stated Mr. Chung has no financial interest
in the business. Mr. Power explained how Mr. Seo is financing the purchase
of Ace Liquors.
Mr. Herbert Schaal, Vice President of EDAW, Inc., stated his office is
located at 240 East Mountain Avenue and will be neighbors to Ace Liquors.
Mr. Schaal addressed his concerns dealing with parking, employee safety,
public spaces and rear access.
•
-7- September 14, 1983
Chairperson Wilson explained that the Liquor Licensing Authority has to
base their decision on needs and desires of the neighborhood and can only
consider opposition with respect to the needs and desires of the neighbor-
hood.
Mr. Schaal stated his concerns do not address needs and desires of the
neighborhood.
Authority member Acott stated she feels neither the needs or desires of the
inhabitants in the neighborhood have been property evidenced. She stated
she feels more evidence is needed from the residents of the neighborhood.
Authority member Long concurred.
Authority member Long made a motion to deny the license on the basis that
the petitions do not adequately show that the needs are not currently being
met. Authority member Monaghan seconded the motion for the purposes of
discussion.
Authority member Monaghan stated he is concerned with the validity of the
signatures. He stated he feels the needs of the neighborhood have not
been made clear. Mr. Monaghan went on to say that he is very concerned
with the ability of Mr. Seo to converse in the English language.
Authority member Long stated that in the past, emphasis has always been
placed on the input from the residents of the neighborhood. He stated he
does not feel it has been shown that the residents of the neighborhood have
been adequately surveyed.
Authority member Wilson stated she is not satisfied with the canvas of the
neighborhood.
Authority member Veazie stated his concern with the signatures and the
language barrier.
The motion was put to vote as follows: Yeas: Acott, Long and Wilson.
Nays: Monaghan, Sheahan and Veazie.
The motion failed.
Authority member Monaghan made a motion, seconded by Authority member
Sheahan, to table the hearing to October 12, 1983, in order to have the
applicant repetition the neighborhood. Yeas: Acott, Monaghan, Sheahan and
Veazie. Nays: Long and Wilson.
-8- September 14, 1983
Final Resolution on a
Retail Liquor Store License for
Ace Liquors, 238 East Mountain Avenue
Authority member Veazie made a motion, seconded by Authority member Long,
to table the final Resolution to October 12, 1983. Yeas: Acott, Long,
Monaghan, Sheahan, Veazie and Wilson.
Final Hearing for a
Tavern License for
Sagebrush Bar and Restaurant, 934 Lemay Avenue
The Resolution outlining the results of the preliminary hearing was read by
title only.
Authority member Long made a motion,
to adopt the Resolution as presented.
han, Veazie, and Wilson. Nays: None.
seconded by Authority member Veazie,
Yeas: Acott, Long, Monaghan, Shea -
Mr. Doug Konkel, attorney representing the applicant, explained that
Sagebrush Bar and Restaurant is comprised of two partners, Mr. John Carlsen
and Mr. William LeNorreys. Mr. Konkel presented Applicant's Exhibits 1 and
2. Applicant's Exhibit 1 was identified as petitions circulated on behalf
of the application. Applicant's Exhibit 2 was identified as the Employee
Handbook for Sagebrush Bar and Restaurant.
Assistant City Attorney Kathy Allin stated that one page of petitions (page
31) has been signed by the circulator but that signature is not notarized.
Mr. Konkel called Ms. Mary Burns to the stand. Ms. Burns was sworn and
stated she circulated the page in question (page 31). She stated she
personally witnessed each signature listed on page 31.
Mr. Konkel called Mr. John Carlsen to the stand. Mr. John Carlsen, general
partner, was sworn and stated he participated in the petitioning process.
Mr. Carlsen stated the majority of people contacted were in favor of the
Tavern license. He explained the area which was covered by petition
circulators. He stated 525 residents, 88 business people, and 60 customers
signed in favor of the license. A total of 122 people signed opposing the
license. Mr. Carlsen pointed out that no one stated they object to the
license being issued. Mr. Carlsen stated 83% of the neighborhood canvassed
favored the issuance of the license. Mr. Carlsen also pointed out that no
other Tavern licenses exist in the defined neighborhood area.
-9- September 14, 1983
In response to a question by the Board, Mr. Carlsen stated that the dif-
ference between a Tavern and Hotel -Restaurant license was not explained at
length. He noted that no one specifically questioned the difference
between the two types of licenses. Mr. Carlsen stated he and his partner
decided to apply for a Tavern license on the basis that they were not sure
they could meet the 25% food requirement. He went on to say that all
establishments that have been licensed at 934 Lemay in the past have held
Hotel -Restaurant licenses and have gone under. He noted that the res-
taurant is currently open for non-alcoholic drinks only.
Mr. Konkel stated he feels the petitions meet the requirements in that it
specifically states the applicants are applying for a Tavern license. Mr.
Konkel stated he does not feel anyone was mislead.
Mr. Carlsen spoke briefly of his background. He then spoke of the Employee
Handbook and training policies. Mr. Carlsen stated he will be responsible
for the training of employees. He noted that his partner will assist in
the training. He explained that each employee will be provided a handbook
to study. After each employee has read the manual, he stated he will
review the manual with them. He added that he will follow up with con-
tinual supervision. Mr. Carlsen pointed out that the manual contains a
section on their ID checking policy. He explained that ID's will be
required at the door and if any waitress or bartender questions anyone's
age, they, too, will check for an ID.
Mr. Carlsen spoke briefly of the menu. He stated they will be catering
primarily to the lunch crowd and only offering a small dinner menu. At
8:00 p.m., music and dancing will be provided. Mr. Carlsen spoke briefly
of the floor plan. He stated a patio will be located on the south and west
side of the building. It was noted that the only access to and from the
south patio is through the restaurant. Mr. Carlsen stated either he or his
partner will be on the premises at all times.
Mr. William LeNorreys, was sworn and spoke of his background. Mr. LeNor-
reys stated he circulated petitions primarily among the businesses within
the area. He stated he was never once questioned about the difference
between a Tavern and Hotel -Restaurant license. Mr. LeNorreys stated that
the response from the neighborhood was favorable. He noted many were
excited to have the restaurant re -open for lunchtime. He stated the
restaurant will cater to the middle class. Mr. LeNorreys spoke of the
extensive renovation they have done to the building. Mr. LeNorreys stated
that no one would be able to pass drinks over the patio area or exit
without going through the restaurant. In response to a question by the
Board, Mr. LeNorreys stated approximately 10% of the people he contacted
refused to sign the petition. Those who refused to sign gave religious
reasons or stated that liquor licenses encourage people to drink. Mr.
-10- September 14, 1983
LeNorreys stated the City and State liquor codes will be kept behind the
bar for employee reference. He explained that music will be provided
during the evening hours. A juke box is being purchased but Mr. LeNorreys
noted that a disc jockey will work weekend nights. He stated there will be
no live bands. In closing, Mr. LeNorreys stated he feels the business will
cater to a cross-section of the neighborhood and past patrons of the
establishment.
Dr. Pete Standard was sworn and stated he owns a medical practice within
the neighborhood area located at 1120 Elizabeth. Mr. Standard objected to
the fact that he was never approached to sign the petition. He stated he
is concerned with how the petitions were circulated.
Mr. LeNorreys stated he circulated the petitions among the businesses in
the neighborhood. He noted that it was a very random survey. Mr. Le-
Norreys stated he did not survey to the east, which is where Dr. Standard's
office is located.
Dr. Nelson Bachus was sworn and stated he owns a medical office located at
1080 East Elizabeth. Dr. Bachus stated he is concerned with the fact that
the neighborhood is confused about the difference between a Tavern license
and a Hotel -Restaurant license. He objected to the fact that the estab-
lishment will not be re -opening as the Old Sagebrush but that it will
probably be run as a disco. On that basis, Dr. Bachus stated he objects to
the Tavern license.
Ms. Kathy Nimetz, 1509 Emigh, was sworn and stated she did not sign the
petition on the basis that the establishment will be a disco bar. She also
stated that when she was approached to sign the petition, it was stated by
the circulator that they are re -opening the old Sagebrush. Ms. Nimetz
stated that she feels this was misrepresented because the old Sagebrush was
not a disco. Ms. Nimitz suggested that the neighborhood be resurveyed with
the petition stating exactly the type of establishment that will be open-
ing.
Mr. Doug Konkel called Ms. Loretta Ryan to the stand. Ms. Ryan was sworn
and stated she was the circulator of the petition who approached Ms.
Nimetz. She explained how she presented the petitions. Ms. Ryan stated
that she does not specifically recall stating that the old Sagebrush will
be re -opening.
Mr. Doug Konkel called Ms. Burns to the stand. Ms. Mary Burns was sworn
and stated she also circulated petitions among the neighborhood. Ms. Burns
explained the manner in which she presented petitions to the residents.
Mr. Karen Hancock, 1416 Emigh, was sworn and stated she signed the petition
but would like to have her signature removed from the petition on the basis
-11- September 14, 1983
that she feels she was misled by the statement that the old Sagebrush
will be re -opening. Ms. Hancock stated at the time she did not know the
difference between a Tavern and a Hotel -Restaurant license. She stated she
has children and that they will be attracted to a dancing -type facility.
Ms. Elaine Burke, resident of the defined neighborhood area, was sworn and
spoke of her concern with the patio. She noted she has a 16 year old who
could be tempted to enter through the patio. She also stated that kids
will be attracted to a disco establishment. Ms. Burke also stated that
when she was approached to sign the petition she was told the old Sagebrush
is re -opening. In closing, Ms. Burke stated she, too, would like her
signature removed from the petition.
Ms. Joan Yust, 1301 Patton, was sworn and stated she would not have signed
the petition had shz known it was going to be a Tavern. She also stated
the circulator of the petition stated the old Sagebrush is re -opening.
Ms. Jan Meyer, resident of the defined neighborhood area, was sworn and
stated she signed the petition not knowing the difference between a Tavern
and a Hotel -Restaurant license. She added that she feels she was misled.
Dr. Standard asked what type of dancing will be provided.
Mr. LeNorreys stated there will be a dance floor provided but it is not the
intent to have a disco. He stated the dancing is not the major function of
the establishment. He explained that they will feature a variety of music
such as country -western and disco. He pointed out that each type of music
will attract a different crowd. Mr. LeNorreys went on to say that it was
not known to himself or his partner that the establishment used to be
called Sagebrush until the petitioning had started. Mr. LeNorreys stated
it is not their intent to mislead people into thinking it will be run as
the old Sagebrush. He addressed the patio issue stating that the present
patio is totally enclosed and that entrance can be gained only through
entering the front door. He stated when the other patio is completed it
will have a 6-8 foot fence surrounding the patio. He assured the Authority
that adequate measures will be taken to prevent someone from entering the
patio other than through the front door.
Ms. Dwain Reuter, 1518 Patton, was sworn and asked if it would be possible
to resurvey the neighborhood which would include an explanation of the
difference between a Tavern and a Hotel -Restaurant license.
Mr. Konkel explained the difference between a Tavern and a Hotel -Restaurant
license. He stated he does not feel the people of the neighborhood would
feel any differently knowing the differences between a Tavern and a Hotel -
Restaurant license because there is very little difference. He added
that dancing would be allowed with a Hotel -Restaurant license.
-12-
September 14, 1983
Chairperson Wilson asked of those people opposing the license whether
they object to the Tavern or whether they object to not being given a full
explanation.
Ms. Karen Hancock stated she is opposed to a Tavern license, as well as not
receiving a full explanation.
Dr. Standard stated he is concerned with the fact that a part of the
neighborhood, specifically the east part, was not informed and have not had
an opportunity to state their feelings.
Dr. Bachus stated he is opposed to a Tavern license.
Authority member Monaghan made a motion to table the hearing to October 12,
1983, to require time for a reassessment of the neighborhood area. He
stated he feels further clarification of the needs of the neighborhood are
needed prior to making a decision. He stated the needs do not have to be
determined by petitions. As -a suggestion, Mr. Monaghan stated neighborhood
meetings could be held.
Authority member Veazie seconded the motion.
Authority member Wilson stated she feels it will be to the advantage of the
applicant to clear up some of the confusion the neighbors have.
The motion was put to vote as follows: Yeas: Acott, Long, Monaghan, Shea-
han, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Authority member Veazie suggested that the applicant canvas the east side
of their defined neighborhood area. He stated he feels the applicant
should avoid stating the old Sagebrush is re -opening.
Chairperson Wilson thanked the neighborhood for attending the meeting.
Final Resolution on a
Tavern License for
Sagebrush Bar and Restaurant, 934 Lemay Avenue
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Veazie,
to table the Final Resolution to October 12, 1983. Yeas: Acott, Long,
Monaghan, Sheahan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Final Hearing for a
Beer and Wine License for
Chef Wang's Chinese Restaurant, 3640 South Mason, Unit 12
At the request of the applicant, Authority member Veazie made a motion,
seconded by Authority member Long, to table the final hearing for Chef
-13- September 14, 1983
Wang's Chinese Restaurant to October 12, 1983. Yeas: Acott, Long, Mon-
aghan, Sheahan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Final Resolution on a
Beer and Wine License for
Chef Wang's Chinese Restaurant, 3640 South Mason Unit 12
Authority member Veazie made a motion, seconded by Authority member Long,
to table the Final Resolution to October 12, 1983. Yeas: Acott, Long,
Monaghan, Sheahan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Police Report
Officer Frank Russell stated for the Board's information that Fort Ram will
be extending their hours on Friday and Saturday evenings. He explained
that they will be open from 2 a.m. to 4 a.m. to serve breakfast and non-
alcoholic drinks only.
Other Business
The Authority requested the City Attorney's Office research whether lan-
guage barrier problems can be considered as a major factor in issuing or
denying a license.
Adjournment
Authority member Monaghan made a motion, seconded by Authority member
Long, to adjourn.
The Chairperson put the motion which was unanimously adopted.
The meeting was adjourned at
� r -1'O �
Secretary