HomeMy WebLinkAboutLiquor Licensing Authority - Minutes - 08/15/1984LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY
Regular Meeting - August 15, 1984
7:30 p.m.
A regular meeting of the Liquor Licensing Authority was held on Wednesday,
August 15, 1984 in the Council Chambers of the City of Fort Collins Muni-
cipal Building. Roll call was answered by the following members: Acott,
Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson.
Authority Members Absent: Sheahan
Staff Members Present: Wanda Krajicek, City Clerk
Paul Eckman, Assistant City Attorney
Frank Russell, Police Department
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
July 18, 1984, Approved as Published
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Bujack,
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of July 18, 1984 as pub-
lished. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Abstain: Monaghan.
Show/Cause Hearing
VFW, 603 Lesser Drive, Tabled to September 12
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Bujack,
to table the show/cause hearing for VFW, 603 Lesser Drive to September 12
at the request of the licensee. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan,
Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Show/Cause Hearing
Spring Creek Liquor, 1005 W. Stuart,
Tabled to September 12
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Bujack,
to table the show/cause hearing for Spring Creek Liquor, 1005 W. Stuart, to
September 12 at the request of the licensee. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long,
Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
-2- August 15, 1984
Show/Cause Hearing
South College Liquor, 2724 S. College
Tabled to October 10
Authority member Bujack made a motion, seconded by Authority member Long,
to table the show/cause hearing for South College Liquor, 2724 S. College,
to October 10 at the request of the Police Department. Yeas: Acott,
Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Show/Cause Hearing
Ace Liquor, 238 E. Mountain,
Letter of Reprimand Ordered
Paul Eckman, Assistant City Attorney, described the circumstances of the
alleged violation noting that on June 26, 1984 an employee of Ace Liquors,
Soo -Chang Jang sold beer to Cadet Officer Craig Dodd who was under the age
of 21. He noted that attorney Steve Francis, representing the licensee,
had agreed to stipulate as to the facts of the violation. He added
Detective Russell was recommending a one -day suspension of the license.
Steve Francis elaborated on the agreement to stipulate and debated whether
the conduct of the Cadet Officer constituted entrapment and whether there
actually was a violation.
Authority Member Monaghan made a motion, seconded by Authority member
Veazie, that a violation did occur on June 26, 1984 at Ace Liquors, 238
East Mountain.
Steve Francis pointed out that Section 18-1-709, C.R.S., defines the
defense to any criminal charge. He stated the basis is if the police,
through their conduct induce a person to commit an act which he would not
ordinarily have done, that constitutes entrapment. He felt Cadet Officer
Dodd went beyond legal bounds in that he lied about his circumstances with
regard to his I.D. He felt the cadet's conduct was in violation of the
entrapment statute.
Mr. Francis stated Mr. Jang is a law-abiding citizen and is fully aware
of the liquor laws. He indicated he felt Mr. Jang did not violate the
statute under which he was charged (Section 12-47-128).
Mr. Francis asked, if the Authority determined a violation did occur, that
they consider the conduct of the Cadet Officer and the good record of Mr.
Jang and either direct no punishment or a letter of reprimand.
-3- August 15, 1984
Paul Eckman, Assistant City Attorney, noted entrapment was an old but not
very successful defense to criminal charges that dated back to the days of
prohibition. He stated the entrapment defense was not applicable to
administrative proceedings and cited case law depicting similar cases
not determined to be entrapment. He stated he did not believe this action
constituted entrapment.
Mr. Francis again asked the Authority to take the conduct of the Cadet
Officer into consideration.
Paul Eckman stated there was no duress or compulsion on the part of the
Cadet Officer against Mr. Jang to force him to commit an offense against
his license. He again stated the entrapment defense was not applicable.
The vote on Authority member Monaghan's motion that a violation did occur
was as follows: Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie, and Wilson.
Nays: None.
Authority member Long asked if there had been a violation at this estab-
lishment while under the management agreement during the transfer of
ownership process.
Detective Russell replied
had been found not to be
given to all cadets prior
cadets are told they may
on their person. He noted
if false or fraudulent ID
in these situations.
that the incident concerning Mr. Jang's wife
a violation. He described the instructions
to compliance checks of this type and noted
use a story to indicate why they have no ID
that state statute held the licensee blameless
is presented and noted no ID is ever presented
Authority member Monaghan made a motion, seconded by Authority member
Veazie, to direct the Assistant City Attorney to write a letter of repri-
mand to the owners of Ace Liquors, 238 E. Mountain.
Authority member Acott noted she would favor a one -day suspension but was
persuaded to go with the letter of reprimand because of Officer Krenning's
letter citing the cooperation and assistance of the licensee during an
assault incident occurring March 31 at Ace Liquors.
Authority member Bujack agreed with Authority member Acott's comments.
Authority member Wilson felt a letter of reprimand was appropriate based on
Mr. Jang's refusal at first to sell to the Cadet Officer.
Authority member Long felt Mr. Jang should have insisted on ID being
presented and pointed out any young person could fabricate a story similar
to that of Cadet Officer Dodd.
-4- August 15, 1984
The vote on Authority member Monaghan's motion to direct the City Attorney
to write a letter of reprimand was as follows:
Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: Long.
Show/Cause Hearing
The Bottle Broker, 111 W. Monroe,
One -Day Suspension Ordered
Assistant City Attorney Paul Eckman noted there had been a stipulation as
to the facts relating to the incident occurring June 26, 1984 at The Bottle
Broker. He stated an employee, Le Anne Mason, sold beer to Police Scout
Mark Lantry and noted Lantry was under the age of 21. He stated the Police
Department recommendation is for a one -day suspension of the license.
Tim Dow, attorney representing the licensee, spoke in mitigation and noted
the good record of the licensee. He detailed the facts of the incident and
stated the licensee was taking steps to insure future compliance with the
liquor laws by instructing all employees on store policies that will
prevent another such incident.
Dow cited the economic impact of a one -day suspension and noted it would
mean a great loss of revenue and wages. He stated a mistake had been made,
noted there was full attention being made to insure future compliance, and
asked the Authority to consider a letter of reprimand.
Le Anne Mason, 1625 W. Elizabeth, L-2, was sworn before testifying about
the training given to her at the time of hiring. She noted she had been
assisting a handicapped customer and had not asked the Scout for ID because
he had been waiting some time. She stated she thought Lantry was a regular
customer and noted that although other employees were in the back of the
store, she was alone out front and had the responsibility of running the
register and assisting all customers.
Eloy "Corky" Ortega, 1852 17th Avenue, Greeley, store owner spoke of the
remedial measures taken since the incident. He spoke of his employee
training sessions and noted he was fully aware of his liability as a
license -holder. He felt a one -day suspension would cause severe hardship.
Ortega stated Le Anne Mason was one of his principal clerks and that no
punishment was given to her as a result of this incident. He felt it was
an isolated case of poor judgement and noted it had made the other em-
ployees more aware of the penalties for not checking ID's.
-5- August 15, 1984
Authority member Long asked if Mark Lantry would step to the podium and
then asked Mr. Lantry how he was dressed on the day of the incident.
Detective Russell presented a photo showing Mr. Lantry on June 26, 1984,
the day of the incident.
Mark Lantry, 2522 Tulane Drive, was sworn and noted he was 19 years of
age.
Authority member Acott stated she felt poor judgement was not an excuse and
that a letter of reprimand tells the licensee what he already should
know.
Authority member Acott made a motion, seconded by Authority member Mon-
aghan, to order a one -day suspension to be served on a business day, within
the next 30 days, at the convenience of the licensee and to direct the
premises be posted. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie and
Wilson. Nays: None.
Show/Cause Hearing
North College Liquors, 814 N. College,
One -Day Suspension Ordered
Authority member Long asked that the record show he did not participate in
the discussion or vote on this item.
Assistant City Attorney Paul Eckman noted the licensee had agreed to a
stipulation as to the facts of the incident. He stated that on June 26,
1984, Patricia Delaney had sold beer to Cadet Officer Craig Dodd who was
under the age of 21.
Authority member Bujack made a motion, seconded by Authority member Veazie,
that a violation did occur. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Monaghan, Veazie and
Wilson. Nays: None. Long withdrawn.
Patricia Delaney, 621 Greenfield Court, was sworn and spoke of the exten-
sive training she had given her employees. She stated she had no excuse
for selling to a minor and asked for a letter of reprimand because of her
short time in operation.
Authority member Bujack noted the short time in business concerned him and
stressed the importance of following her own training procedures.
Authority member Bujack made a motion, seconded by Authority member Acott,
to order a one -day suspension to be served on a business day, within
the next 30 days, at the convenience of the licensee and to direct the
premises be posted. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson.
Nays: None. Long withdrawn.
-6- August 15, 1984
Show/Cause Hearing
Park Central Discount Liquors, 1045 Garfield,
Tabled to October 10
Bill Darrow, attorney representing Park Central Discount Liquors, requested
the show/cause hearing be tabled to October 10, 1984. He stated he had
just learned of the hearing the day before and noted the confusion had
resulted because of the change of location of the store and because of the
notification being routed to the corporation's Denver attorney rather than
local counsel.
Authority member Bujack noted he was not in favor of tabling the hearing.
Authority member Veazie made a motion, seconded by Authority member Long,
to table the show/cause hearing to October 10. Yeas: Acott, Long, Mon-
aghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: Bujack.
Special Events Permit, 3.2%
Fort Collins Jaycees - September 20, 21, 22, 1984,
Permit Denied
Scott Lewis, 2537 Bozeman, events manager, spoke of the Jaycee's intent to
modify their plan based on Detective Russell's concerns. He stated the new
plans were designed to avoid conflict with patrons of the Library. He
spoke of the added security, the sanitary arrangements for the event and
noted there would be a 4' fence separating the Library from the beer
garden. He outlined the goals of the event and detailed the manpower
assignments. He noted the Jaycees had been approached by the Campus West
Merchants Association and had decided to sponsor the event.
Detective Russell noted the new plan was much improved and would normally
be recommended for approval with the exception of concerns over lighting.
He stated it was still a poor location for this type event and noted the
Police Department's recommendation would now be for approval with concern
about the location.
Roger Burton, Campus West Merchants Association, owner of Sport About,
noted his organization had approached the Jaycees to put on this event in
connection with a street dance. He detailed the plans for parking since
the event will occupy a portion of the parking lot (approximately 20
spaces). He stated the beer garden area would be fenced off from the
adjacent stores and that security personnel would be present at intervals.
He described the lighting present and noted the beer was to be sold in cans
to provide distinction and control between this event and the Library.
Cans will also provide easier clean up and can be recycled.
-7- August 15, 1984
Scott Lewis asked for a chance to do the event and noted they hoped to have
the event next year based on this year's record.
Authority member Wilson noted there had already been complaints about noise
from the Library. She did not see the event as a Jaycee fund-raiser and
noted it appeared as a brokerage of non-profit status. She felt the Campus
West Merchants Association was making the decisions instead of the Jaycees,
that the event was not thought all the way through, and that the location
was poor.
Authority member Acott felt the event was not well -planned and the planning
was being done too late.
Authority member Monaghan felt the event was ill-advised at that location.
Authority member Monaghan made a motion, seconded by Authority member
Long, to deny the application for a Special Events Permit for the Fort
Collins Jaycees on September 20, 21, 22, 1984. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long,
Monaghan, and Wilson. Nays: Veazie.
Transfer of Ownership for
Smith's Spudworks, 626 South College,
Approved
Authority member Wilson asked the record to show she did not participate in
the discussion or vote on this item. Authority member Long chaired this
portion of the meeting.
Kathryn Teumer, 14 Forest Hills Lane, gave background information on the
transfer, noting she would be responsible for operating the business. She
noted her son had recently graduated from CSU in food management and that
she hoped he would assume the business in some years.
Detective Russell noted the Colorado Bureau of Investigations report had
been received on this application and all others being considered at the
meeting and that they were all clear.
Teumer noted the former owner, Ron Daggett, had given a complete training
session to her and the current employees who were also employees of Mr.
Daggett.
Authority member Monaghan made a motion, seconded by Authority member
Acott, to approve the transfer of the Beer and Wine License from Ronald and
Jeannette Daggett, dba the Spudworks, 626 South College, to Kenneth and
Kathryn Teumer. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan, and Veazie. Nays:
None. Wilson withdrawn.
-8- August 15, 1984
Transfer of Ownership for
Upper Crust, 802 South College and 2601 South Lemay,
Approved
Bill Randall, 3501 South Stover, 13-291, representing the Upper Crust (both
locations) noted he was the manager of the South College store and noted
there would be no change in the management of either store as a result of
the transfer of ownership.
Authority member Monaghan made a motion, seconded by Authority member
Bujack, to approve the transfer of ownership from Upper Crust, Inc., 802
South.College and 2601 South Leman, to Upper Crust Restaurants, Inc. Yeas:
Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
New Application (3.2% - Class A) for
Duds 'N Suds, 1427 W. Elizabeth,
Application Accepted and Boundaries Set
Marty Tjelmeland, 8060 Niwot Road, Longmont, representing Duds 'N Suds,
noted the building was currently under construction and that the boundaries
as presented were acceptable to him.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Monaghan,
to accept the application, set the final hearing date for September 12 and
to approve the boundaries as recommended by the administration. Yeas:
Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
The boundaries as recorded were as follows:
North from the subject premises to Mulberry Street.
West from the subject premises to Taft Hill Road.
South from the subject premises to Prospect Street.
East from the subject premises to Shields Street.
New Application (Tavern) for
Fort Collins Club Lounge, 1307 E. Prospect,
Application Accepted and Hearing Dates Set
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Bujack,
to accept the application for a Tavern license for Fort Collins Club
Lounge, 1307 E. Prospect and to set the preliminary hearing date for
September 12 and the final hearing date for October 10. Yeas: Acott,
Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
-9- August 15, 1984
Preliminary Hearing and Preliminary Resolution
for a Hotel -Restaurant License, Chows Garden,
#23 Old Town Square, Suite 100,
Resolution Adopted and Boundaries Set
Gene Mitchell, Old Town Square Developer, noted this application was the
first of 5 new liquor licenses proposed for Old Town Square. He requested
the boundaries for this application and future Old Town Square applications
be designated as the entire City limits. He spoke of the project and noted
its uniqueness, noting the area of interest goes beyond the immediate area
in the case of this project.
Assistant City Attorney Paul Eckman noted he had no legal or practical
objection to Mr. Mitchell's request.
Applicant George Chow noted he was in agreement with Mr. Mitchell's re-
quest.
Authority member Bujack made a motion, seconded by Authority member Long,
that the boundaries for the Hotel -Restaurant application submitted by
George and Edward Chow, dba Chows Garden, be designated as the entire City
limits. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays:
None.
Assistant City Attorney Paul Eckman read language amending the Resolution
setting forth findings on the preliminary hearing and designating the
boundaries of the neighborhood to be served as the entire City limits.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Bujack,
to adopt the preliminary Resolution as amended. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long,
Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Preliminary Hearing and Preliminary Resolution
for a Hotel -Restaurant License,
Senor Tomas Mexican Restaurante, 2900 Harvard
Resolution Adopted and Boundaries Set
Elizabeth J. Robinson, 601 Powderhorn, owner of the establishment, stated
the boundaries as proposed were acceptable to her.
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Bujack,
to adopt the preliminary Resolution as presented. Yeas: Acott, Bujack,
Long, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
-10-
August 15, 1984
The boundaries recommended by the administration were as follows:
North from the subject premises to Prospect Road.
West from the subject premises to Shields Street.
South from the subject premises to Horsetooth Road.
East from the subject premises to Lemay Avenue.
Final Hearing and Final Resolution
for a Hotel -Restaurant License,
The House of Yakitori, 151 South College,
Granted and Resolution Adopted
Brad March, attorney representing Roots and Wings, Inc., dba House of
Yakitori, spoke of the exhibits to be presented.
Assistant City Attorney Paul Eckman noted he had examined the exhibits and
that they were acceptable and might be given any weight the Authority
desired.
Marianne Driscoll, 86 Saddle Mountain Road, Colorado Springs, gave back-
ground information on her education and work experience and noted House of
Yakitori was a franchise operation. She spoke of the intensive 6-week
training program provided by the franchise grantor. She spoke of the
corporate structure and noted there would be an outside manager after the
first 2 months of operation. She noted the restaurant would be located in
the Classic Building and leased from Dixon, Inc.
Mr. March presented applicants exhibit 2, which was an information packet
on the House of Yakitori, and included a site plan and a floor plan.
Ms. Driscoll noted the seating capacity of the lounge was 24 and the
downstairs area was 56. She noted she would manage the restaurant until
she was comfortable with the operation of the business. She spoke of her
knowledge of the liquor statutes and described the training procedures to
be used for employees at the restaurant. She estimated the restaurant
would open October 1-15.
Mr. March presented a petition expressing support for the restaurant con-
taining approximately 443 signatures and marked as Applicants Exhibit
1. Applicants Exhibit 3 was three letters of support from downtown res-
taurant owners.
Authority member Bujack made a motion, seconded by Authority member Acott,
to grant the Hotel -Restaurant license for Roots and Wings, dba House of
Yakitori, 151 South College Avenue. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan,
Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
August 15, 1984
Authority member Long made a motion, seconded by Authority member Bujack,
to approve the Final Resolution as presented. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long,
Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays: None.
Change of Trade Name for
Pasta Plus, 149 North College to
Panache!. Approved
Authority member Bujack made a motion, seconded by Authority member Acott,
to approve the change of trade name for Pasta Plus, 149 North College to
Panache! Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie and Wilson. Nays:
None.
Police Report
Detective Russell introduced Detective Mike Dolan who will be sharing the
liquor enforcement duties as a part of the possible reassignment to patrol
of Detective Russell. He noted the exact date of the change was uncertain.
Authority member Wilson stated the Authority had been pleased with the work
of Detective Russell and directed staff to draft a memo to Police Chief
Bruce Glasscock expressing the Boards desire that Detective Russell be
retained in his current assignment.
Adjournment
Authority member Bujack made a motion, seconded by Authority member Acott,
to adjourn the meeting. Yeas: Acott, Bujack, Long, Monaghan, Veazie and
Wilson. Nays: None.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
airperson
becretary