HomeMy WebLinkAboutNatural Resources Advisory Board - Minutes - 11/15/2006MINUTES
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD
Regular Meeting
200 W. Mountain, Suite A
November 15, 2006
For Reference: Linda Knowlton; NRAB Chair -
223-9328
Ben Manvel, Council Liaison -
217-1932
John Stokes, Staff Liaison -
221-6263
Board Members Present
Alan Apt, Glen Colton, Nate Donovan, Rob Petterson, Liz Pruessner, Clint Skutchan,
Ryan Staychock
Board Members Absent
Linda Knowlton, Joann Thomas
Staff Present
Natural Resources Dent: Geri Kidawski, John Stokes
Guests
Pete Whiting, CSU Student
Jim Hibbard, Marcia Hilmes-Robinson , Utilities
Ann Hutchison, Fort Collins Chamber of Commerce
The meeting was called to order at 6:05 p.m.
Agenda Review
Donovan proposed adding to the Agenda the review of the Proposed 2007 Legislative
Policy agenda set to go to Council for adoption on Tuesday November 21, 2006, the draft
Planning Agenda, and a report on the Solid Waste Committee meeting.
There were no objections to these additions.
Staychock said he had been asked to go over the December Agenda which he would do
during new business.
Review and Approval of Minutes
• Skutchan asked about adding a correction that doesn't involve him?
• Staychock commented that he had been told if you see something in the minutes,
you should email it to everyone for comment.
• Skutchan said it was in the opening statement to the NRAB Focus/Direction. It
just starts with his response. Page 7, Linda actually opened that and there is
nothing from her.
Natural Resource Advisory Board
November 15, 2006
Page 2 of 7
Stokes suggested to the Board that the minutes be prepared in more of a summary format
which would minimize the time spent by staff. He proposed the review of this meeting's
minutes in the more general format for the Board review.
Staychock said he would prefer that minutes be reviewed at the meeting instead of
emailing everyone. It doesn't seem very efficient.
1.
It was agreed to hold off on approving the October 18, 2006 minutes until the December
meeting.
Public Comments
There were no public comments at this time.
Glade Reservoir — Mark Easter
Easter said he represents the Poudre Canyon group of the Sierra Club, and will be
covering threats to the Cache Is. Poudre River that are presented in particular from the
Glade Reservoir. He gave a presentation regarding threats to the Poudre and alternatives
to new storage and restoration of the Poudre.
- Acknowledgements
- Presentation outline included:
o Background on NISP
o Economic Concerns
■ Major funding source will be bonds
■ Existing ratepayers held liable
■ Yearly population growth rate of 4-6% needed to service debt
■ There are cheaper and less risky alternatives
o Recreational Impacts
■ River "dry -ups" Estimated native flows at Canyon mouth
■ Existing flows would be reduced by half
■ Fisheries and boating impacted
■ Riparian ecosystem and wetlands threatened
■ Effectively no recreation at proposed reservoir site
o Environmental Impacts
■ Flow regime
■ Water quality
• Habitat issues
o Alternatives to New Storage
■ Conservation
• Improve Efficiency
■ Demand based on realistic population projections
• Consumption projections must include conservation/efficiency
o Restoring the Poudre
■ Adopt a river management paradigm
■ Restore the flow regime
• Seek long-term sustainability
Natural Resource Advisory Board
November15,2006
Page 3 of 7
■ Replace "hard" diversion structures with "soft" structures that
support ecosystem
■ hnprove water quality
■ Establish a water trust for senior water rights
o Conclusions
No new storage should be built until:
- Existing infrastructures is fully utilized
- Conservation and efficiency opportunities have been
exhausted
- Interruptible supply agreements are fully integrated into the
water supply system
A brief discussion followed Easter's presentation regarding irrigation efficiency,
advantage to upgrading ditches, consideration of climate change, conservation, and the
attainability of goals.
Stormwater Update Action Required — Bob Smith
Smith gave a brief update. They have presented the plan to a number of Boards. The
Board's recommendations follow:
• Water Board passed a motion supporting Option D, 100 year Critical Facility
• Planning Board also supported that recommendation
• Land Conservation and Stewardship Board —recommended that the Product
Corridor be eliminated and also Dryland Access.
There was a good turnout for the Nov 14 open house and staff received a lot of positive
comments. They are scheduled for a study session Nov 28 h with Council and tentatively
scheduled for Council consideration after the first of the year and have focused their
discussions on Floodplain Regulations. Staffs preference would be to get rid of the
Product Corridor and Dryland Access.
Stokes indicated that the Land Board also supported Critical Facilities. Staff feels that the
plan will not have an impact on the environmental quality of the river. In terms of
environment, staff liked that the County would accept general conditions of the code
related to changes that would be made to the floodway. The City has other mechanisms
in place to protect the environment on the river corridor which include building setbacks,
the Land Use Code as well as Section 3.4.1 of the code which deals with protecting
natural features on private property. Staff also agreed on alternative D.
Apt made a motion to adopt alternative D, Critical Facilities
Peterson seconded the motion.
Smith passed around the revised Poudre River Floodplain Regulation review property
information and discussed the changes with the Board.
Natural Resource Advisory Board
November 15, 2006
Page 4 of 7
Staychock confirmed the motion on the table was in support of Alternative D.
The motion passed unanimously.
A brief discussion followed regarding the conveyance of the Board's recommendation to
Council. It was agreed that Smith would include the Board's recommendation in the
agenda item summary indicating their support of Alternative D-Critical Facilities, due to
the environmental impact.
North College Subarea (Corridor) Plan — Clark Mapes
Mapes shared some history on the plan. There is currently a North College Corridor plan
in existence. There was concern from citizens that the area was lagging behind the rest of
the city with its physical and economic conditions. In response, the original North
College Corridor Plan was adopted in 1994. Since that time, things have changed so an
update to the plan is needed. The Vision sets a foundation for goals which are:
• The Highway itself— North College Avenue/ SH 14/ US 287
• Connections to Downtown across the Poudre River Corridor
• More Complete Street Network
• Community Appearance & Design
• Uses and Activities
• Public Support for Change
• Finance and Administration
The overall topics are:
• Forward -looking
• Support and buy -in
• "More Downtown -Like Feel"
• Next generation of storm drainage financing
• Owner -assembly of property
• Identify Image
• Commercial market
There was discussion regarding future plans for 287, what has kept North College from
prospering and the impact to floodways.
Mapes stated that there is definitely interest in making the necessary changes to promote
North College and seeing the river corridor link the North College corridor with
Downtown and the rest of the community. They recognize the need to maintain a Natural
Resources buffer along the river.
Stokes commented that staff has talked about the North side of the river on the south side
of Vine in the floodway and would like to do restoration there if given the chance to
provide native vegetation and make it a more viable part of the natural system. There has
been consideration of extending the trail from Gustav Swanson all along this short
Natural Resource Advisory Board
November 15, 2006
Page 5 of 7
section of the river and under Collegeproviding access from the north side of town down
to the river.
Following further discussion, Staychock summarized the key points of the presentation
and discussion stating that the main natural resources seem to be the floodplain, the
Poudre River, smart growth and also the discussion about new streets and roads that will
be feeding into the system. He commented in order to facilitate a healthy floodplain and
smart growth, there are some barriers to giving some investment in this area. The
investment seems to be in infrastructure needs — stormwater drainage, and utilities access.
That within this plan includes residents housing, commercial buildings, hopefully some
urban forestry. He asked if there is anything else they weren't catching.
Mapes said they will take the plan to Council's work session Nov. 28's He asked if the
Board has an opinion and if he should bring this back for the January 17a' meeting.
Colton wanted to reiterate what Stokes had said about maintaining a wildlife corridor.
Staychock said he thought it would be appropriate for the Board to review the entire plan
and comment on the natural resources issues. He asked Mapes to please email a copy of
the plan whenever it is ready but definitely by the January packet. It was agreed that this
would be a 20-30 minute agenda item for January 17a'.
Skutchan offered to draft some language prior to that meeting.
Six month agenda Planning Calendar
Staychock explained the Planning Agenda.
• Table 1 has items scheduled that will appear on the next agenda.
• Table 2 lists priority agenda items that the Board needs to hear about in the next
2-3 months.
• Table 3 lists general topics and Focus on Fort Collins items and timetable.
• Table 4 has topics of upcoming interest.
• Table 5 shows accomplishments — agenda item, action taken, if any and if there
was a memo sent to Council.
The Board agreed to use the Planning calendar for several months and see how it works.
Any items of interest that come up should be emailed to Staychock to be placed on the
calendar.
December agenda items were discussed.
• Wildlife Plan — 1 hour
• Climate Protection Plan and Greenhouse Emissions — 1 hour
Stokes had spoken with Ted Shepherd regarding the impacts involved following the 2006
Land Use Code changes which occurs bi-annually. Shepherd indicated there is currently
Natural Resource Advisory Board
November 15, 2006
Page 6 of 7
nothing with any relevance to Natural_ Resources, however, there will be one in June
dealing with pervious pavement.
January agenda items will include:
• John Phelan — Demand Side Mgmt
• RTA
• CllimateWise — Kathy Collier.
Staychock asked if it would be a good time to talk about that long range plans for the
Board. Stokes indicated that it would be a 1 %z hour conversation. It was agreed that
February would be a good time for that.
It was agreed that Skutchan would have the time slot prior to the January meeting for an
Environmental Economics committee meeting.
Discuss Legislative policy for 2007
Donovan said he would like to discuss a few things that need to be highlighted for
Council. The policy is scheduled to be adopted on November 21 e`. He proposed that the
Board write a memo to Council which he would be willing to draft. He would put the
discussion in the form of a motion. The memo would include the following items::
• Page 6 & 7— City's adopted air quality objectives
o Items 4, 5 and 7 - Support legislation that increases the fuel efficiency of
vehicles including the CAFE standards at the Federal level.
o Page 7, #8 — Support incentives to encourage renewable energy
o Page 7, #11 — Promote pollution prevention.
• Page 8 - Support Net Metering
• Page 12 — Retail Wheeling
o # 20 — Support options for renewable energy
• Page 19 - Hazardous Materials Management
o #4 — Support pollution prevention programs
• Page 23 - Planning and Land Use
o # 4 - Support the integration of sustainability measures in new land uses
and development
o #8 — Support a baseline of consistent and coordinated basic land use and
transportation planning.
• Page. 26 & 27 — Recycling and Solid Waste
o #1 — Support integrated waste management planning for the state
o #2 — Support incentives and funding for efforts to promote waste reduction
o #6 - Support establishing a solid waste goal up to 35%
o #12 —Support regulations that support recycling of electronic equipment.
• Page. 33 — Water Utilities
o #6 - Support a mechanism to enhance in -stream flows
Natural Resource Advisory Board
November 15, 2006
Page 7 of 7
Donovan made a motion that the Board submit a memo to Council.
Peterson seconded the motion.
The motion was unanimously approyed.
It was agreed that Donovon would draft the memo for the Board's review and then send
to council.
New Business:
Donovan reported on the Solid Waste Committee meeting.
• Possible ban of electronic waste from going to the landfill from residential
customers.
• Yard waste diversion
• Staff resources that might be needed in solid waste to implement parts of the
strategic plan and impact on BFO project in March.
• Tackling waste stream to increase profits
• Delay with transition of Rivendale drop off site
• Christmas tree drop off will continue
• 2007 state legislation
• Solid waste control and green house gases
Peterson would like to address in the new year how the Board can re -energize the solid
waste reduction plan. It will be added to the Planning Agenda.
Ann Hutchinson had the following announcements:
• Dec 12a' 7:30a.m. — Environmental. Panel, 225 S. Meldrum
• The Chamber will release environmental business award applications on their web
site with a deadline Jan 16s'.
Donovan agreed to chair the December meeting as both Knowlton and Staychock would
not be present.
Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Submitted by Judi Vos, Admin Support Supervisor