HomeMy WebLinkAboutNatural Resources Advisory Board - Minutes - 04/03/19910
MINUTES
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD
218 N. COLLEGE AVE. - CONFERENCE ROOM
APRIL 3, 1991
Board Members Present
Will Smith
Tim Johnson
Harold Swope
Chuck Davis
Board Members Absent (excused)
Bill Miller
Staff Prese
Ward Luthi
Dave DuBois
Deni LaRue
Christine Ferguson
Tom Shoemaker Julie Bothwell
Karen Manci Edith Felchle
Minutes
It was moved, seconded, and unanimously approved that the
Minutes of the March 6, 1991 NRAB meeting be accepted with
typographical corrections in paragraph two of the public
participation section.
National Heritage Area Legislation
Shoemaker said that Senator Brown intends to introduce the
Legislation within days. The City places great emphasis on the
Poudre River Corridor and its resources. Senator Brown recognizes
this and is pushing toward some type of federal designation to
recognize the river's importance. Shoemaker said the National
Heritage Area will allow local control, and will be more
politically feasible than other designations considered. The
emphasis of a Heritage designation is on culturally and
historically significant resources. The purpose is to emphasize
the working river and its history in our development, focusing most
of the interpretive and educational facilities in the Fort Collins
and Greeley areas.
Council will consider a resolution at the April 16 meeting to
endorse the draft legislation and urge Congress to move ahead with
the Heritage designation. Council is interested in hearing
comments from the Boards and Commissions.
Miller, Shoemaker, and Johnson met on April 2, to discuss the
draft legislation. Miller had the following comments: on page
three, top of the page, "natural open space" should be added; he
would like to put "habitats" after "historical lands" on page
three, line fourteen; add "and natural" on page fifteen, line
twenty-one after "cultural." Johnson felt this was workable, but it
was not acceptable to Utility Services.
Shoemaker said that, for NRAB, part of the theme of the
Shoemaker said that, for NRAB, part of the theme of the
"Working River" relates to how human use of water affects the
environment, how it affects wildlife, and how it may enhance
wildlife habitats.
Shoemaker said that the drafted memo to Council recommends
endorsing the legislation, but it also underscores the belief
that natural areas are part of that cultural heritage and will be
included in the future programs. He said that there was good
support for the draft and that the Greeley City Council is
preparing to endorse it as well.
Johnson said that the letter focuses not only on water
management, but also on providing irrigation water.
Smith asked how this will interact with other things that
are going on within the City such as the Wastewater Treatment
Plant along the Poudre River which would be in the Corridor area
between here and Greeley. He wanted to know, with the river
running through the Gateway area, how that affects some of the
consideration of the purchase of land in the Gateway area for
preservation.
Shoemaker answered that operations along the river or the
development of the river would not be affected.
It was moved, seconded, and passed unanimously to transmit
to Council the Poudre River National Heritage Area Legislation
letter as written.
Environmental Awards Recommendation
LaRue said that she, Felchle, Johnson, and Smith met and
went over the applications and determined a winner in each
category.
Nelson Metals was the winner in the business category.
LaRue said they felt Nelson Metals had "gone where no business
had gone before in the area of recycling." Smith added that the
key in the business category was action beyond what others were
doing.
Karen Christophersen (Lopez School) was the winner in the
school category. LaRue said they were looking for a school
program that was innovative. Ms. Christophersen was active across
the entire range of the school.
Citizens Planners was the winner in the Group/Organization
Category. The committee felt that this organization had the
ability to really make a difference. LaRue said the message that
they wanted to send out is that participation pays off and that
you have the power to take part in the City's environmental
policy, plan- ning, and future. Felchle commented that having
three members on the NRAB that are members of Citizen Planners
did not have an effect on Citizen Planners being chosen. NRAB
members of Citizen Planners excused themselves from the
discussion.
LaRue said that all nominees would be recognized at the
symposium for their efforts and actions. The winners will
receive plaques. The runners up will receive certificates.
It was moved, seconded, and unanimously approved that Nelson
Metals receive the 1990 Environmental Action Award in the
It was moved, seconded, and unanimously approved that Citizen
Planners receive the 1990 Environmental Action Award in the
Group/Organization Category. Swope, Smith, and Luthi excused
themselves from voting on this category because they are members of
Citizen Planners. This reduced the voting quorum to four for this
particular vote.
Education Committee
Felchle presented an approximate agenda for the opening of the
Symposium. The Mayor is being invited to give a five minute
presentation. Then the Environmental Action Awards will be
presented. Felchle added that there will be tables for handouts.
There will be a separate table for Holnam materials. Felchle handed
out copies of criteria for handouts and said that all handouts must
meet this criteria.
Transportation Committee
Smith said that City Council had no major problem with the
Transportation Plan Mission Statement and Objectives presented to
them, although there were some questions. He said that Mayor
Kirkpatrick stated that under the automobile and truck plan there
is nothing about sign synchronization. Smith said that
Councilmember Horak had some concerns with the third principle in
the overall mission statement. Smith said one of his concerns is
that the Transportation Plan is such a broad document, the key is
going to be how specific issues will be implemented. Shoemaker was
asked to let NRAB know when Council's planning retreat will be
held.
New Business
Goals and Obiectives of City
LaRue stressed that goals and objectives from 1978 are still
viable today. Johnson said on page 21, regarding the Natural Areas
Fund, he would like to change the wording from "Open Space" to
"Natural Areas".
Shoemaker commented that it would be very useful for board
members to look over this document. He said that within a week
staff will be finalizing the summary of the EMP Framework. Part of
that discussion will review the goals and objectives related to the
environment. Luthi said that one of the considerations should be
what these mean when they come up against an issue, what
interpretation was meant by statements of goals, policies, etc.
Johnson asked the Committees to focus on their areas and bring
recommendations to the May 1 NRAB meeting.
Johnson wanted some input on the Economic Development section.
Johnson said he has drafted a brief letter pertaining to a comment
Tom Peterson made at the last Joint Chairs meeting regarding a
mechanism for assessing the public benefits and cost of economic
development in the community. Johnson asked Tom Peterson if such
an assessment was possible. Peterson replied that it was possible
without too much effort, but he wondered what purpose it would
serve. Johnson said that the initial primary impacts are generally
accountable, but the secondary ones are not accounted for at all.
of economic development in the community. Johnson asked Tom
Peterson if such an assessment was possible. Peterson replied
that it was possible without too much effort, but he wondered
what purpose it would serve. Johnson said that the initial
primary impacts are generally accountable, but the secondary ones
are not accounted for at all. He also said that these kinds of
economics are a little apart from NRAB, but the question does
impact NRAB.
Johnson asked the Board how this should be handled.
LaRue asked if it was possible to come up with the measures.
Luthi said that the City Manager has indicated that it is
not necessary to calculate costs of development because
development will pay its own way.
Johnson replied that NRAB should just recommend that there
be accounting for this. Johnson will mention this to Tom
Peterson at the April 4, meeting of the Joint Chairs.
1992 Budget Issues
The NRAB discussed the items for input to the 1992 budget
process.
It was moved, seconded, and unanimously approved that the
NRAB adopt the following listing of priority budget items: (1)
Natural Areas; (2) Alternative Transportation; (3) Low Interest
Conservation Loans; (4) Public Benefits and cost of Growth Study
(5) Recycling Education; (6) and items such as, but not limited
to, Stormwater Water Quality Support, World Class Environmental
Center, additional Air Quality Monitoring Station.
Natural Areas Policy Plan (NAPP)
Shoemaker said that the preliminary draft will go to the
printer the weekend of April 5, then will be hand delivered to
NRAB. Shoemaker also said the plan is to discuss the status in
May, and then ask for final recommendation in June. A tour has
been scheduled with the Stormwater Board for April 12 at 2:00
p.m. NRAB is invited to attend. A tour has also been scheduled
for April 20 at 8:30 a.m., with lunch provided afterward.
Shoemaker said that sometime in late April two evenings will be
scheduled for a slide show and round table discussion, one open
house, and two sessions of public tours.
He stated that a forty -minute slide show has been put
together that walks through the content of the NAPP
recommendations. Because it was rather late to start something
this lengthy, he asked if the board wanted to go ahead with the
discussion now or reschedule this item.
It was moved, second, and unanimously approved that a
special meeting be set to view the Natural Areas Policy Plan on
April 10, at 7:00 p.m. Staff will announce a meeting place.
Announcements
Luthi stated that at one time the Board had asked Joe Frank
and Tom Peterson to determine the amount of pavement and roof top
area in Fort Collins, and did not receive an answer.
Luthi asked if NRAB could receive some information about
n
U
Holnam in Lyons burning hazardous waste, and leakage coming from
the burning, so the information can be used in their
considerations regarding Holnam's proposal in LaPorte. Shoemaker
replied yes that staff would work on gathering some information.
Luthi also asked for a copy of Denver's low flow toilet
resolution. He said he also would like a reply on the cost of
maintained, versus non -maintained, park land.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:20.