HomeMy WebLinkAboutSenior Advisory Board - Minutes - 08/13/1997FORT COLLINS SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES
The Fort Collins Senior Advisory Board held a regular meeting on Wednesday, August
13, 1997 at the Senior Center.
ATTENDANCE
Ed Johnson
Jane Goodhard
Esther Springer
Mae Espeland
Erik Margolis
Yvonne Myers
Marjorie McTaggart
Jill Taylor
Blanche Yakmas
EXCUSED
STAFF
Fran Ward
Barbara Schoenberger
Steve Budner
GUEST
Christina Ulrich RSVP
Lynette McGowan L.C. Ombudsman
Kary Rios OOA FCAHB
CITY COUNCIL LIAISON
Ann Azari
II. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the chair, Yvonne Myers at
2:02PM.
III. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION - None
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: The First Presbyterian Church sent the board the name of the
new representative to be put on the SageNet mailing list.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of July 9, 97 were approved 8-0 with the following
change, strike the first sentence under H. Liaisons Report.
VI. GUEST SPEAKER: Lynette McGowan Latimer County Ombudsman. She explained the
program, to act as a mediator, advocate, to provide information and referral. She also
gave a brief history of the program. Lynette has been at this position since May 1, 97.
She reported that there are 12 Nursing Home facilities, 30 Assisted Living facilities in
Larimer County. The Ombudsman's office receives 15-20 complaints per month.
VII. OLD BUSINESS
A. OUTREACH MEETINGS UPDATE: The October 9, 97 meeting will be at noon, at
the Plymouth Congregational Church. Blanche Yakmas, Jill Taylor and Yvonne Myers
will represent SAB.
Yvonne Myers will meet with Youth Board on Sept. 3, 1997
and Recreational Servia
Fort Collins Senior Center
August 18, 1997
To: Human Relations Commission
From: Fort Collins Senior Advisory Board
Re: Query re status of proposed revisions to the
Human Rights Ordinance
On October 9, 1996 the Senior Advisory Board sent you a
letter of endorsement to the proposed changes of this ordinance
with a copy to City Council liaison Ann Azari.
The endorsement was based on the information given during a
presentation to this board by one of your members in August 1996,
a summary of them, and a copy of the entire ordinance.
In recent months rumors about changes to the proposals have
been flying: letters to the editor, Soapbox opinions, hearsay.
SAB members have tried to find out what, if any, changes
have been in the proposals since the board's letter of endorse-
ment. There was a statement in a Soapbox article that something
was done to them in April, 1997, but SAB has had no official word
from any source.
Please let SAB know as soon as possible what (again, if any)
further revisions have been made since last year so that the
board can take another look at its endorsement.
In the meantime, the board feels that its endorsement should
be placed on "Hold" until it knows the status of the proposed
changes.
Sincerely,
Marjo 'ie McTaggarv� for the
Fort �ollins Senior Advisory Board
pc: Ann Azari, City Council Liaison
1200 Raintree Drive • Fort Collins, CO 80526 • (970) 221-6644 • (970) 221-6645
August, 1997
TO: City Council Members
FROM: The Fort Collins Senior Advisory Board
SUBJECT: Fee Discount Policy
Members of the Fort Collins Senior Advisory Board and the Parks and Recreation
Board have met several times over the past months to discuss the fee discount
policy. It appeared, after the last of those meetings, that a general understanding
had been reached. Members of the SAB left the meeting believing that an
agreement was formed to make a joint request to City Council for a fee discount
policy that would be used city-wide. It was later revealed, through staff, that
members of the Parks and Recreation Board had decided not to make a joint
statement. They had, apparently, decided to make their own statement that would
focus on removing age as a discount possibility. As a board, we would like to
register our disappointment with their actions.
First, we felt it would have been more professional to have the change in action
presented to the SAB members first hand rather than having it relayed informally via
staff. Second, we believe that the request that is being forwarded is not based in
reason supported by fact but, rather, is driven by personal agenda.
Therefore, we as a board have taken a firm stand that we believe discounts should
continue' to be offered to senior citizens and youth under 18 years of age. We feel
that this is a viable policy to carry across the city for the following reasons:
Financial Implications
1) The information provided by Recreation Staff does not indicate that this
discount is creating a monetary crisis nor does it show that the implication of
the discount is endangering any of the programs. Many people over 60 don't
ask for the discount and pay the full fee instead. Some do ask for the 20%
discount and some of them could qualify for greater discounts but won't
apply through the City's financial need process.
2) As the senior population grows, this amount will most likely grow but current
projections also show this to be a minor issue. If, at a future date, the
discounts cause major impact, then the issue could be revisited.
3) Members of the Parks and Recreation Board expressed irritation that the
middle -age, middle and lower -income citizens are bearing the brunt of the
cost and, because of this, they can't participate in activities. But, many of
these families not only have children under 18, they may also have aging
parents for whom they help provide support. If both of these groups are
allowed the discount, then that middle group would, in effect, also reap the
benefit.
Social Implications
1) Providing a senior discount is a societal statement of appreciation and respect
for our elders. Our western/anglo society has often been accused of casting
off our aging population and being completely oriented toward the eternal
quest for youth. Policies which show outright statements of support and
honor like city-wide senior discounts are needed as a counter to this image.
2) In our fast -paced, impersonal world, youth often feel isolated and forgotten.
Policies such as a city-wide discount for youth promote a feeling of inclusion
and encouragement to join.
3) This is viewed as an important community statement to seniors and youth
alike:
a) Research has shown that involvement in community activities
actually prolongs life and independent living, thereby reducing medical
and life assistant costs which are inevitably borne by the community at
large.
b) On the other end of the spectrum, encouraging youth involvement in
community activities provides a sense of belonging to and pride in the
community. This, in turn, can help reduce crime and vandalism and
encourages positive growth experiences for our younger citizens.
The proposal (as we've heard third hand) that is to be offered by the Parks and
Recreation board bases all criteria on income. But this overlooks the stigma and
mind -set that goes along with that requirement. Professionals who work with
seniors have confirmed that many seniors will not apply for "low-income" status
because of the image it projects. They feel they have been self-sufficient all their
r1
L-A
lives and it is a matter of pride. For the most part, they simply will not apply for a
"poverty" or "low-income" discount but will, instead, do without the activity.
Based on this information, we strongly urge Council to adopt a city-wide policy of
discounts for 60 years and older seniors and for youth under 18 for all activities
which fall under the Department of Parks and Recreation umbrella.
If you need any additional information or require further discussion, please contact
our board through Barbara Schoenberger at the Fort Collins Senior Center.