Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTransportation Board - Minutes - 11/18/1992Draft Minutes to be approved by the Board at the December 16, 1992 meeting. TRANSPORTATION BOARD MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 18, 1992 5:40 - 7:10 P.M. BOARD LIAISON: Council Liaison -- Cathy Fromme Staff Liaison -- Rick Ensdorff BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark Egeland, Sara Frazier, Colin Gerety, Elizabeth Hudetz, Dave Lemesany, Sharone Mekelburg, and Paul Valentine. BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael Poppenwimer and James Reidhead. STAFF PRESENT: Rick Ensdorff and Cindy Scott. GUESTS PRESENT: John Daggett, GayLene Rossiter, Tom Frazier - Transfort staff, Peggy Catlin - HNTB, and Ed Secor - NEATS Citizen's Advisory Committee member. AGENDA: 1) Call to Order 2) Approval of Minutes 3) Overview - Proposed New Bus Route Presentation by John Daggett 4) Short Term Committee Report - NEATS 5) Other Business DISCUSSION TOPICS: 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Gerety called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved, seconded and unanimously approved that the minutes from the October 21, 1992 Transportation Board meeting be accepted as presented. 3. OVERVIEW - PROPOSED NEW BUS ROUTE Mr. Daggett distributed a Transfort Bus Route map and 1993 "Fact Sheet". He went over the process that staff used to determine the specifics of this proposed route. Criteria that were considered in this proposal were: medical access, serving the transit dependent (crosstown and downtown), employment, recreation, education, and commercial. He then displayed a large, clearly defined map to show the Board where the proposed route is. He explained in detail what streets will be used, times, destinations, and who the route will serve. Mr. Daggett invited the Board to comment or ask questions about the proposal. He stated that he specifically wanted to know how the Board feels this route fits with the Mission Statement of Transfort, how it fits in with the other eight routes, and general feedback. After a question/answer session, Staff Member Ensdorff asked Mr. Daggett if he needed a written recommendation from this Board. Mr. Daggett responded that he would like to leave it to the Board's discretion as to whether they feel they have had enough time to review the information to make a recommendation. The Board had positive comments on the proposed route and felt that it would fit in with the other routes. SHORT TERM COMMITTEE REPORT - NEATS Staff Member Ensdorff introduced Peggy Catlin from Howard Needles Tammen and Bergendoff, the consulting firm that has worked on the NEATS project with the Citizen's Advisory Committee. Ms. Catlin gave a detailed explanation of the Minority (Alternative 1) and the Majority (Alternative 3) opinions. She showed the proposals of each on displays and charts. She explained such items as the difference in projected traffic volumes for the year 2010, the studies of noise and air pollution, how the environment would be affected, and the difference between the components of a State Highway and a city arterial. There were many questions and clarifications. After the Board felt. comfortable with all the information, a few members stated their viewpoint on the issue: Board Member Valentine stated that he is in favor of Alternative 3 for a number of reasons, one of them being that he feels businesses on east Mulberry want and need the traffic. Board Member Lemesany also voiced his agreement with Alternative 3 because of the financial aspect and the better time frame it presents to get the truck traffic out. Board Member Egeland is in favor of Alternative 3 also, but felt that the specification of a time frame should be included in the Board's letter of recommendation, as well as a statement making it clear that funding should be secured, ensuring that action will be taken. Chairman Gerety concluded the discussion by asking the Board what their recommendation is. It was the consensus of the Board that Alternative 3 is their recommended alternative. Ensdorff stated that he would draft a letter for both Chairman Gerety's and Vice Chairman Lemesany's signature. 5. OTHER BUSINESS Staff Member Ensdorff distributed a hand out on the City's Comprehensive Plan Elements and the four reports from the Ad -Hoc Committee. Board Member Valentine inquired about the status of the Remington/Mountain Bike Lane project. Ensdorff stated that Rita Davis from the City's Transportation Department would be having an Open House on that issue. More information will be forthcoming. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Cindy L. S ott, Board Secretary