HomeMy WebLinkAboutZoning Board Of Appeals - Minutes - 10/13/1994•
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALB
October 13, 1994
Regular Meeting
Minutes
The regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held on
Thursday, October 13, 1994 in the Council Chambers of the City of
Fort Collins City Hall. Roll was answered by: Breth, Michelena,
Huddleson, Shannon, Gustafson, Cuthbertson. Absent: Perica.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Huddleson.
Council Liaison:
Staff Liaison:
Staff Support Present:
Ann Azari
Peter Barnes
Peter Barnes
Ann Chantler
Paul Eckman
The minutes from the August meeting were approved.
Appeal 2115. 1704 S Whitcomb, by Christine and Gail Oberhofer,
approved with condition. Section 29-133(4).
----- The variance would reduce the required rear yard
setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a new detached,
two -car garage to replace the one -car garage.
----- Petitioner's statement of hardship: The property
currently has a detached, one -car garage.There is no
attached garage. Parking is a big problem in the
neighborhood because of the proximity to C.S.U. The
owner would like to have a two -car garage to replace
the existing garage. However, meeting the 15 foot
setback would place the garage too close to the house
to get a car in and out of the garage. Building an
attached two -car garage would require a side setback
variance, and there really is no place that one
could be built without a variance. The property behind
this lot is open, C.S.U. property which sits about
15 feet lower than this lot, so this request does not
impact any other property.
•
Zoning $card of Appeals
October 13, 1994
Page 2
Staff Comments: Last October, the petitioner applied
for a variance to reduce the rear setback to 5 feet,
to allow an oversized 2 car garage. The ZBA denied that
variance, due in part to the belief that the garage
could be made smaller. The petitioner is now asking
for a setback reduction to 10 feet instead of the
original 5 feet, and is proposing a smaller standard
size 2 car garage.
Three letters were read, two in support of the appeal and one
against the appeal.
Zoning Administrator Peter Barnes submitted to the Board a map of
the area with two car garages highlighted. Mr. Barnes stated Mr.
Oberhofer was at the Board one year ago, and is now submitting a
revised, more standard size garage proposal. Mr. Barnes added if
this appeal was approved, Mr. Oberhofer would still need to go to
the Planning and Zoning Board for an easement vacation. Mr. Barnes
pointed out there is no parking in front of the house, the curb is
painted red because of the manhole in the street.
Mr. and Mrs. Oberhofer appeared before the Board. Mrs. Oberhofer
stated they had lived in their home for 14 years and in the past
five years, C.S.U.Is enrollment is at an all time high. Some houses
on Whitcomb are rentals to students with cars, and some other
commuting students just park along Whitcomb street. Parking is a
problem. Mrs. Oberhofer mentioned they did widen their driveway so
they could have more room to park their cars. She mentioned she
does not like to have her cars "warming up" in the cold months,
polluting the air and having the exhaust fumes go into her kitchen
door. She feels this addition would be an improvement to the
neighborhood and they were trying to upgrade their place.
No one was present in favor of this appeal.
Mrs. Bonita Markstom, 1708 S. Whitcomb, appeared before the Board
in opposition of this appeal. She stated this addition would be a
detriment to the neighborhood. She stated she knew C.S.U. student
parking was a problem, but hoped the solution to this problem could
be taken care of in a bigger scope, not just approving an appeal
for this address. She stated the Oberhofers purchased this house
with the knowledge of the size of the lot, and requested this
appeal be denied.
Mr. Barnes stated the red zone in front of 1704 S Whitcomb appeared
to be a unique situation, he did not see any other red zones
painted on the curb in this area due to manholes. He added parking
on the street does not belong to the home owner.
Zoning Board of Appeals
October 13, 1994
Page 3
Board member Huddleson stated he was having a difficult time
finding a hardship. He stated parking may be an exceptional
situation because of the manhole in the front on the house.
Board member Gustafson stated the family may have outgrown the
property in the past 14 years.
Board member Michelena stated the appellant would have to get an
easement vacation from the Planning and Zoning Board, the red zone
in the front of the house does pose a situation and Mr. Oberhofer
has redesigned the plans to make it smaller.
Board member Gustafson moved to deny Appet. 2115 for a lack of
hardship. There was no second, the motion died.
Board member Shannon moved to approve Appeal 2115, with the
condition that an easement is granted from the Planning and Zoning
Board, because of the hardship of lack of parking. Board member
Breth seconded the motion. Yeas: Breth, Michelena, Shannon,
Cuthbertson. Nayes: Huddleson, Gustafson. The motion passed.
Anneal 2116. 315 S Loomis. by Alicia Cook, passed. Section 29-
119(5).
The variance would reduce the required side yard
setback along the north lot line from 5 feet to 3
feet for a carport addition to the north side of the
existing detached garage.
Petitioner's statement of hardship: The fence
constructed on the rear of the lot across the alley
hinders the ability of the owner to maneuver their
pick-up truck into a standard size carport. The extra
width is necessary in order to accommodate the
required turning movements. The pick-up doesn't fit
into the garage. I
----- Staff Comments: None
Zoning Board of Appeals
October 13, 1994
Page 4
Zoning Administrator Peter Barnes stated this property is located
in the NCL zone.
Alicia Cook, owner, appeared before the Board. She stated she has
lived at this address for 15 years. She submitted pictures of the
pick-up truck. She stated because the pick-up is large and the way
the alley angled, they can't fit the pick-up in the carport unless
it is about 13 feet wide.
No one was present in favor or in opposition of this appeal.
Board member Broth stated the carport will be open on one and, and
so had no problem with this appeal.
Board member Gustafson stated the lot was narrow and the layout of
the alley also presented limitations.
Board member Gustafson moved to approve Appeal 2118 for the
hardship stated. Board member Shannon seconded the motion. Yeas:
Broth, Michelena, Huddleson, Shannon, Gustafson, Cuthbertson. The
motion passed.
Appeal 2117. 521 W. Maple Street by Mike Keys, approved. Section
29-167(4).
----- The variance would reduce the required rear yard
setback from 15 feet to 6 feet for a second floor
addition to an existing single family home. The
existing rear setback of the home is only 2 feet from
the property line, so the second floor will be set
back further than the existing.
----- Petitioner's statement of hardship: The original home
was only 540 square feet. The home was built at the
rear of the lot, 86 feet from the front property line,
Which is an unusual situation. The addition will have
a greater setback than the existing home has.
----- Staff Comments: The resubdividing of lots in this
immediate area years ago has resulted in some very
peculiar conditions. This lot is also peculiar in
that the home is located at the rear of the property,
instead of the front.
Zoning Board of Appeals
October 13, 1994
Page 5
Zoning Administrator Peter Barnes showed a map with the layout of
the properties involved.
Mike Keys, owner, appeared before the Board. He submitted drawings
of the proposed addition. He stated the house is very small, only
540 square feet. He would like to bring the house to more modern
standards. He stated the circumstances surrounding this lot are
strange, and there is no other place to build on to the home.
No one was present in favor or in opposition of this appeal.
Mr. Barnes agreed this was a strange division of lots, but the City
did not have any files to refer to for history on this property.
Board member Gustafson stated the lot was narrow and the house was
built far back on the lot. Board member Huddleson stated the lot
presented the hardship as does the unique arrangement of the
buildings.
Board member Gustafson moved to approve Appeal 2217 for the
hardship stated. Board member Shannon seconded the motion. Yeas:
Breth, Michelena, Huddleson, Shannon, Gustafson, Cuthbertson.
Nayes: None. The motion passed.
Anneal 2218. 305 E Elizabeth. by St. John's Evangelical Lutheran
Church, approved. Section 29-167(5).
The variance would reduce the required side yard
setback along the south lot line (the alley) from
25 feet to 5 feet for a classroom addition to the
south side of St. John's Evangelical Lutheran
Gburch. The 5 foot setback will be for the covered
entry, the remainder of the addition is proposed
to be setback 12 feet.
Petitioner's statement of hardship: The lot is a
corner lot and the church faces Elizabeth Street. The
south side of the church really functions as.a rear
yard, but is legally the side yard. The required rear
yard setback in this zone is 5 feet from the alley,
which the addition complies with. Due to existing
floor plan layout and the different floor levels,
this is the only location for the addition ,hich
Zoning Board of Appeals
October 13, 1994
Page 6
lends itself to improving handicap access and the
construction of an elevator. The church owns many of
the lots on the south side of the alley. The alley
adds to the side yard open space needs of the church,
and in fact the covered entry is 25 feet from the
church's lot across the alley. Existing parking
spaces which will be lost will be relocated on
church owned property.
Staff Comments: Most of the corner lot situations that
are cause for setback variances deal with single family
homes. Even though this is a church use, the same
scenario exists because of the corner lot. The front of
the building faces Elizabeth, but the legal front is
Mathews. Therefore, the south lot line is legally the
side lot line, even though it functions as the back of
the church. All the other properties in this block
could build to within 5 feet of the alley, because the
alley is considered the rear property line.
Zoning Administrator Peter Barnes reviewed the ordinances of
corner lots. He stated the legal front of the church is on
Mathews Street. He stated the church might actually gain one or
two parking places if this appeal is granted.
Lucia Liley, president of the church congregation appeared before
the Board.
Ms. Liley stated the church has a need to modernize. 1/3 of their
membership is elderly, a large population is handicap and the
church needs to install an elevator for their use, add restrooms
for the handicap and classrooms. Presently the only way to get to
the classrooms is by very steep steps. The plan includes
beautifying the back of the church. Ms. Liley presented a graphic
board of site and elevations to the Board. Ms. Liley added the
remodeling effort would not impair the public, have no impact to
the neighbors and stated the lot was an exception because of the
side yard/front yard situation.
No one was present in favor or in opposition of this appeal.
Board member Gustafson stated the church was trying to meet
accessibility issues, the side yard and front yard did create a
hardship and he supported this appeal.
Zoning Board of Appeals
October 13, 1994
Page 7
Board member Gustafson moved to approve Appeal 2118 for the
hardship stated. Board member Michelena seconded the motion.
Yeas: Breth, Michelena, Huddleson, Shannon, Gustafson,
Cuthbertson. Nayes: none. The motion passed.
Other Business:
Peter Barnes reviewed the dates for the 1995 Zoning Board of
Appeals meetings.
The meeting was adjourned.
Chuck Huddleson, Chairman
Peter Barnes, Zoning Admin