HomeMy WebLinkAboutZoning Board Of Appeals - Minutes - 08/14/1997ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
REGULAR MEETING
August 14, 1997
8:30am
11 Council Liaison: Ann Azari 11 Staff Liaison: Peter Barnes 11
Chairperson: Martin Breth, Jr.
229-1629(w) 226-5101(h)
The regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held on Thursday, August 14, 1997, in
the Council Chambers of the Fort Collins Municipal Building. The following members were
present: Shannon, Keating, Lieser, Breth, Felner, Stockover, Gustafson
Absent: None
Staff members present: Peter Barnes, Zoning Administrator
Paul Eckman, Deputy City Attorney
Elain Radford, Building & Zoning Admin. Support
Leta Payton, Building & Zoning Admin. Support
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Breth.
The minutes from the May 1997 meeting were approved.
The minutes from the June 1997 meeting were approved.
No meeting was held in July 1997.
Appeal 2198, 1525 Blue Spruce, Petitioner Sonja Stephens, Larimer County Facilities
Department, CN Zone, Section 3.2.2(k)(2)(a).
Appeal was approved with the condition that when lot 8 is built upon, the parking is in
compliance with lots 8, 10, 11, and 12.
--- The variance would increase the maximum allowed number of parking spaces from 233
to 256, in order to allow 23 new parking spaces to be added to the parking lot for the 2
Larimer County office buildings located at 1501 and 1525 Blue Spruce Dr.
-- Petitioner's statement of hardship: The number of allowed parking spaces by the code is
calculated based on the square footage of the occupancy of specific uses. The total
square footage of the 2 buildings is 63,488 sq.ft. 52,226 sq ft. is considered general
office and is allowed 3 parking spaces/ 1000 sq.ft. of floor area. The remaining 11,222
sq.ft is considered medical office and is allowed 4.5 spaces/1000 sq.ft. However, due to
the nature of the service provided by the social service department, which occupies the
entire 31,744 sq.ft. of 1501 Blue Spruce Dr. The applicant believes that it's parking
ZBA
August 14, 1997
Page 2
impact is the same as a medical office and should be calculated at the higher amount.
Also, 5000 sq.ft. of the storage area is going to be converted to offices, adding to the
already congested situation. There is a demonstrated need for additional parking to
serve the customers.
Administrator Barnes discussed with the Board the nature of this appeal and gave some
background information on parking code regarding Larimer County's variance request. He
commented that in addition to the statement of hardship on the Agenda, there is a letter from the
petitioner outlining some additional data and facts which the appellants may review with the
Board.
Barnes stated this is the first variance request the Board has heard regarding a new code
requirement under the new Land Use Code. This is a new requirement under the Parking
Ordinance. Under the old code a minimum number of parking spaces were required. The only
requirement was two parking spaces for every three employees on a major shift, regardless of the
zoning district or the use, as long as the use was non-residential. No maximum was required.
Barnes explained that now, under the new code, parking is limited to a maximum number of
spaces allowed. A maximum number of spaces cannot be exceeded which is based on the use of
the property. He stated there is a table in the code that sets forth the uses and the maximum
parking for a particular use, i.e.: for a fast food restaurant the maximum parking spaces is 15 per
1,000 square feet of floor area. Barnes explained that in the two requirements in question on
today's appeal, the maximum number of parking spaces is calculated upon categories called
General Office and Medical Office.
He stated that in this particular situation, Larimer County Health Department has their clinic
facility which qualifies as a medical office and they are allowed 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet
of floor area devoted to medical clinic. The remaining floor area of both of the buildings is
considered General Office use and is limited to a maximum of 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square
feet of floor area. Barnes continued that in doing the calculations for these buildings, they are
already over their maximum. Currently they have 233 parking spaces. Being over their
maximum becomes a non -conforming status due to being grand fathered in. Now they want to
add an additional 23 spaces, so the variance is for increasing their parking by 23 spaces which
puts them more non -conforming, and over the maximum, than they already are regarding parking
spaces.
ZBA
August 14, 1997
Page 3
Barnes clarified that Larimer County has set forth their documentation and data as to why they
feel they need the additional parking and it is up to the Board to determine whether or not they
have demonstrated a hardship that qualifies for a variance to increase what they are allowed. He
stated that what Larimer County is allowed under the code, based on their floor area and types of
use, is 207 spaces. So, if this were a new development, the maximum number of parking spaces
allowed would be 207. They currently have 233 spaces which puts them 26 spaces over already,
and they want to add another 23 spaces.
Board member Shannon asked clarification, from Barnes, on the philosophy or purposes of the
code.
Barnes explained that one of the intents of the code was to reduce reliance on the automobile.
Additionally, to prevent large seas of asphalt and put more of an emphasis, along street scapes
specifically, on buildings as opposed to parking lots. The code went from a minimum to a
maximum to encourage people to use alternative modes of transportation and things of that
nature.
Barnes gave a slide presentation showing the existing parking lots for the two Larimer County
buildings. The parking lot behind 1525 Blue Spruce drive would be extended a short distance to
the north and there would be an identical parking lot with parking on two sides of the driveway -
adding 23 parking spaces.
Chairperson Breth asked if the private drive will always be there and end up being another
parking lot for the fourth filing of Country Club Corners.
Barnes responded that it's probably remote that it would become a parking lot since it does serve
their loading and was part of the traffic study of the portion that's been built. There would have
to be major amendments to approve it being vacated and replace with something else like a
parking lot.
Breth asked if it is an access easement.
Barnes confirmed it is.
ZBA
August 14, 1997
Page 4
Breth asked when phase four is built on, behind the two County buildings, the drive could stay
there but another landscape requirement would be made on the west side of the drive.
Barnes replied that it would depend upon where they locate their buildings. If they put their
service area behind the building, yes, there would be some form of landscaping requirement.
Board member Stockover asked for clarification on the 1525 building considered as General
Office use with a portion as Medical Clinic.
Barnes explained that the Health Clinic is in 1525 and this portion qualifies as Medical Clinic
use which qualifies for the 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The remaining portion,
which is the majority of the building, is considered General Office use which is allowed 3
parking spaces per 1,000 square feet floor area.
Appellant , Sonja Stevens from Larimer County Facilities, addressed the Board. She stated that
the client numbers in Social Services are very high and do not reflect a General Office traffic
pattern. Employees and clients are already using mass transit, car pooling, and bicycles as ways
to get to work. Stevens explained that the parking is quite congested during peak client times,
frequently during the month, such as when the clinics happen, when food stamps are distributed,
etc. and overflows the lots.
Board member Lieser asked where the parking overflow happens when the lot is full.
Stevens replied that some employees park on the street on Bristlecone Street, which runs along
the south side of 1501 Blue Spruce, to leave spaces in the parking lot for clients.
Lieser asked if the data presented to the Board of 5455 clients per month are proven figures.
Stevens confirmed that they are and were obtained from departments housed in the two
buildings.
Shannon asked if a "set appointment" system would alleviate the parking problem rather than a
first come, first served system.
ZBA
August 14, 1997
Page 5
Stevens replied that appointment systems are used, particularly for the health clinics and when
the food stamps are distributed they have certain letters of the alphabet on certain days that runs
over a two week period. When food stamps are distributed they serve 2200 people in two weeks.
Shannon commented that when she has been to the clinic for immunizations it is first come, first
served and everyone sits for long periods of time. Set appointments would have 10 people
waiting rather than 20 people waiting.
Stevens stated that she would have to talk with the Health Clinic.
Breth commented that even the additional spaces they are asking for are now enough spaces.
Stevens responded that they don't want a "sea of asphalt" either.
Lieser asked Barnes if Larimer County is currently meeting the landscape requirements for the
parking lots, and would they have to add additional landscaping for the additional 23 spaces.
Barnes replied that the new code requirements have changed a little regarding how to calculate
what kind of landscaping is required, but from initial calculations they do meet the landscape
requirements. They will be required to provide additional landscaping for the new portion,
specifically along that private driveway on the west side. .
Lieser asked what is the impact of cars parking in the roadway, if their clients actually park
outside the parking lot against the curb, on traffic.
Barnes responded that because Blue Spruce is fairly wide with parking permitted on the street,
except by the bus stop, there would not be any traffic circulation problems or safety issues.
Stevens commented that the on street parking calculated was only on the Larimer County
buildings side of Bristlecone and Blue Spruce streets. They did not measure across the street.
Board member Keating asked for the numbers of employees who park in the parking lots.
Stevens responded that she does not have exact numbers and the numbers vary day-to-day
because some employees take the bus or ride bicycles, etc. In the complex there are currently
307 employees and there will soon be 317 employees.
ZBA
August 14, 1997
Page 6
Keating explained that his reason for this question has to do with governmental agencies who are
passing new codes to do something about alternate transportation.
Stevens commented that alternate transportation means are being used though she does not know
what percentage.
Stockover asked about the impact of the lot when it does develop.
Breth also wanted to know about the lot to the north and if it is developed, would there be
another parking lot between 1525 and it.
Barnes stated that the county owns the property and he doesn't know what their plans are or what
kind of building will be there. The new code would basically say the majority of the parking
would have to be on the side of the building or in the rear of the building. If they built a building
on the property to the north, this proposed new parking lot extension would be behind that
building which would comply with code.
Barnes commented that when they see a site specific development plan application for that lot,
the code requirements on circulation and shared parking would apply.
Breth commented that the proposed extension of 23 spaces may be of minor impact, if there was
another building built on the north lot and another parking lot installed.
Barnes replied that, from that standpoint, the parking lot would be where they would want it to
be.
Stockover stated that in the Land Use Code it is stated that, "off street parking shall be located on
the same lot or same premises as the building or use for which they are required unless such
spaces are provided collectively by two or more buildings or uses on adjacent lots in a single
parking area located within the boundaries of the adjacent lots." He commented that the adjacent
lot does not have a building for the use.
Barnes replied that the next statement in the Land Use Code is: "or an alternative location as
approved by the director" which is carried over from the old code ,and we still have that
flexibility to approve alternative locations. He explained that a parking lot is also listed as an
accessory use in the code and the Accessory Use section of the code states that "...it is ordinarily
ZBA
August 14, 1997
Page 7
located on the same lot" which means it does not have to be on the same lot. Barnes stated that if
Larimer County wants to, they can amend a legal description so their legal description of 1525
Blue Spruce was lot 8 and lot 9, then it would be one parcel.
Stockover asked if the county should be required to do this.
Bames stated no, because nothing in the code precludes them from putting it on another parcel of
ground with a separate legal description.
Dick Anderson, Larimer County Facility Management, addressed the Board and requested to add
his comments. He stated that in reference to the 307 employees that work in the two buildings,
the county's intent, and direction from the commissioners, is to encourage employees to
consider alternative transportation. He commented that each building has showers and bike
racks, and he feels a majority of employees do use alternative transportation. Anderson also
added that a number of employees and clients do use the bus. He stated that their request to add
the 23 spaces still leaves them short of what is needed, but they are not encouraging more spaces
than this due to economics and they do not want a "sea of asphalt" there.
Anderson explained that, in reference to expanding, the Human Development and Social
Services departments have recently combined to better provide community services. They see
the growth happening and the purpose of buying the properties is to expand their services there,
and this 23 spaces extension would be integrated into the plans for the new building to the north
and includes adding to the landscaping along the west side.
Board Discussion:
Shannon commented that it seems some of the problem is self-imposed and there may be
alternatives that could be utilized to alleviate the problem. They are already over what is the new
law and they should have to conform.
Keating stated he concurs and has a problem with the city and county passing new laws for
alternative transportation, then the city and county ought to be the leaders in this. He commented
he does not see a hardship.
Gustafson stated they do have a definite hardship with parking and some of it may be the way
they operate their business and some of it is the actual nature of their business with low income
people dropping in who maybe are not able to schedule definite appointment. He stated that in
order to approve their request some of their office space may have to be reclassified as a health
service use rather than general office. If both buildings were classified as health service use, they
• 0
ZBA
August 14, 1997
Page 8
would be at the allowed number of spaces of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Gustafson
commented he has been to these buildings when no parking could be found in the lot or on the
street.
Stockover stated he is in agreement with that, however, his concern is in partially developing a
lot. He asked how can the county partially develop what would be lot 8? Stockover requested
that if this appeal is approved, could an amendment be added so, when the next building is built,
it would have to bring the four lots into compliance. He explained that his concern is with a
building being built that would need even more parking spaces due to high pedestrian use.
Barnes asked for clarification from Stockover that for the next building the floor area would have
to be calculated and added to the two existing buildings, in order to determine the maximum
number of parking spaces allowed total for the three buildings, and they could not exceed this
amount under any condition.
Stockover confirmed this is correct.
City Attorney Eckman stated that since there is a single owner of the property, this may be done.
If there was more than one owner of these properties, it may not be possible to impose this
requirement to an owner who is not a party to this appeal application.
Stockover asked what would happen if the two non -developed lots were sold.
Eckman explained that because these appeals are recorded and become permanent record with
the Clerk and Recorder of Larimer County, any purchaser would know of this burden on that
property before they purchase the property.
Stockover asked if it would be a pre-existing parking easement.
Eckman stated it would not be an easement but would be an incumbrance on that property that
any new parking would have to worked into the adjacent parking at the time they construct their
building.
Board member Felner asked how the City defines general offices versus health offices.
Barnes explained that medical offices are not defined and there is a definition for professional
offices which includes general office type of use and medical use of offices. He stated the table
that is in the code states medical office and the intent was for the type of use where there is
constant short-term use of parking - a high client turnover where they only stay a short time then
0 0
ZBA
August 14, 1997
Page 9
leave. A general office is where employees stay all day and maybe leave for lunch, and there is
not much of a client base. The table does not recognize much in between these two. The county
has stated that while they are a general office use, their client base and the amount of traffic they
get is similar to a medical office. Their situation is unusual in that they have so much floor area
taken up by general office use, however, the impact of their business is no different than the
health clinic there.
Shannon asked if it would be possible to add another classification
Barnes responded that it is possible because the table in the code is not complete. The code went
into effect on March 28, 1997. They have been to council twice since then , in April and in July,
with code changes which will go into effect August 15, 1997. More substantive issues have not
been dealt with yet. Staff have discussed among themselves potential changes for the parking
section but there is no guarantee anything will be added or changed.
Stockover motioned to grant this appeal with an amendment that when lot 8 is built upon, the
parking is in compliance with lots 9, 10, 11 and 12, and if not in compliance, they will go to an
additional review at that time.
Gustafson seconded the motion.
VOTE:
Yeas: Lieser, Breth, Stockover, Gustafson
Nays: Shannon, Keating, Felner
Bames clarified that the motion was approved with that condition on a vote of four to three. He
asked if the county was aware of that condition.
The county confirmed they are aware.
ZBA
August 14, 1997
Page 10
NEW BUSINESS:
The Board discussed with Bames concerns and questions they had regarding this appeal. Barnes
assured the Board that the code table will be discussed and possibly changed for the Fall code
amendments.
A. Introduction of Leta Payton, new Administrative Support staff.
B. Parade: Community Homecoming parade. This year's theme is "Community Unity" and
it is proposed to have all members of Boards and Commissions ride on a float in the
parade to "show the unity of the volunteers who work to make our city better through
participation on boards and commissions." A meeting will be held in September of all
interested participants. The parade will be held on Saturday, October 4, 1997 in the
morning. The application must be completed by the end of September.
Barnes will let it be known that there is interest from ZBA and will inform Board
members when the meeting is in September.
C. City Manager's memo regarding the City Council's policy agenda asks the Boards to play
a role in the completion of their policy plan, review the six policy theme areas, and
evaluate where the work of our board can support the goals stated in the agenda. The
Board spent time commenting on the Policy agenda. A memo needs to be submitted by
September 15, 1997. Barnes will put a memo together for Board review at the September
meeting and submit the final memo to the City Manager by the September 15, 1997
deadline.
/9a,-. >gj-
Martin Breth, Chairperson Peter Bames, Zoning Administrator
FACILITIES MRAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
Dick Anderson AIA, Director
Post Office Box 1190
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190
July 30, 1997
City of Fort Collins
Zoning Board of Appeals
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80522
RE: APPLICATION NO. 2198
PHONE (970) 498-7310
FAX (970) 498-7359
E-MAIL andersrc@co.larimer.co.us
This documentation will further clarify Larimer County's request for a variance to increase the
maximum allowed number of parking spaces at 1501-1525 Blue Spruce Drive. Currently this
office complex has 233 spaces and an additional 23 spaces is requested to increase the total
number of parking spaces to 256.
Under the current code, section 3.2.2(k)(2)(a), "general offices" are allowed 3 parking spaces
per 1,000 square feet (SF) and "health offices" are allowed 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 SF.
conclude that medical offices are allowed more spaces due the number of patient visits
throughout the day and that "general offices" are assumed to have less client traffic. Both
1501 and 1525 Blue Spruce are 31,744 SF office buildings, while the Larimer County Health
Department occupies 11,222 SF at 1525 Blue Spruce.
Currently, in addition to the spaces in the parking lot and on -street parking, employees and
clients utilize altenative transportation including bicycles, carpools and the Transfort Bus
System. The Transfort Bus Schedule Brochure (effective January 2, 1997) even designates
Social Services on the Aqua Route 8 map and, I can only assume, this is do to the number of
clients needing Social Services that utilize the bus service. (On -street parking calculations
include lineal footage of current and proposed parking lots.)
Larimer County Department of Social Services occupies the entire 31,744 SF at 1501 Blue
Spruce and, due to the nature of their business and the number of clients served, parking
spaces are at a premium. Social Services has 175 employees, distributes food stamps to 2,200
clients per month and an additional 600 clients visit Social Services offices each month. I
contend that the Social Services office can be compared to the client numbers that would visit
an average health office.
The Human Development Department (1525 Blue Spruce) has 16 regular employees, 2 intems
and approximately 45 people attend meetings at the Human Development offices each month.
The Health Department has 114 employees that serve an average of 4,205 clients per month.
Additionally, the County is converting 5,000 SF of storage into offices for the Extension
Department. This office will add another 10 employees and 1,250 clients monthly to already
congested parking areas.
July 30, 1997
City of Fort Collins
Zoning Board of Appeals
RE: APPLICATION NO. 2198
page 2
These offices are not designated "health offices" but the client numbers are much greater than
the "general office" designation. If another "high client" designation were available the number
of allowable spaces could jump from 233 (under the current designation of 3 parking spaces per
1,000 SF) to 286 spaces (4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 SF). If the designation were to change,
Larimer County could then add 63 spaces and the actual request is to only add 23.
This two building complex has a total of 317 employees that serve 8,300 clients in an average
month. Since the parking lot accommodates 233 vehicles and 34 vehicles can park on the
street, an additional 23 parking spaces would help to relieve this already congested situation.
Respectfully Submitted,
Sonja J. Stephens
Larimer County Facilities Management
PO Box 1190
Fort Collins, CO 80522
(970) 498-7313 (phone)
(970) 498-7359 (fax)
stephesj@co.Iarimer.co.us (email)
EMPLOYEE & CLIENT COUNT
1501 -1525 BLUE SPRUCE DRIVE
department
employees
clients - weekly average
clients - monthly average
Extension
10
312
1250
Human Development
18
11
45
Health & Environment
114
1051
4205
Social Services
175
700
2800
total
317
2074
8300
Parking lot spaces
233
On -street parking *
34
total
267
* On -street parking calculations include lineal footage of current and proposed parking lots
YEAR ROUND SERVICE
Prods
Ya/Ly
M .
S&NAM
Dow
MOM
a
N 11 %IP
wm
Provides 30-minute service from LaPorte & Mason (NTC)
to The Mission, Social Services & Poudre Valley Mobile Home
Park. Returns to NTC on College Ave.
Service begins 6:23 a.m. from NTC
Last full run leaves NTC at 6:23 p.m.
Last run south from "the Y" at 6:40 p.m.
Service ends 6:45 p.m at NTC
8-BLUE SPRUCE/Y-Northbound
Selected Stops/Minutes Past Hour
NTC :23 :53
Oak St Plaza C TIME :25 :55
DMA :27 :57
Linden & Willow :30 :00
Social Services :36 :06
8-OA K ST PLAZA-Southbound
Mobile Home Park TINIF :40 :10
NTC CHApICZES :49 :19
See pages 32 and 33 for a complete list of stops.
16
City Vager
Citv of Fort Collins
MEMORANDUM
TO: Citizen Board and Commission Chairs •�
FROM: John F. Fischbach, City Manager F �' tI�
RE: City Council's 1997-99 Policy Agenda
DATE: July 15, 1997
Attached you will find a copy of the City Council's 1997-99 Policy Agenda. This document
represents the City Council's vision of the policy work which it plans to accomplish during the next
two years. It represents a broad and ambitious set of goals which touch each service which the City
provides.
You and your board or commission have a role to play in the successful completion of Council's
policy plan. Please review the six policy theme areas and evaluate where the work of your board can
support the goals stated in the agenda. I encourage you to discuss the Policy Agenda with your board
or commission at your next available meeting.
I would appreciate each board and commission submitting a memorandum to me outlining how your
group believes that its work will support the accomplishment of the agenda. These work plans should
be submitted to me by September 15 and should include the following information:
What projects is your board or commission working on that relate to items on the policy
agenda?
What advisory roles of your board should the City Council utilize in accomplishing its
specific policy goals?
What resources from City staff would be helpful in providing this support and advice?
City Council will schedule a study session for the Chairs of its Boards and Commissions to discuss
ways in which you can support the Council's work plan. This meeting will be scheduled later this
fall. The agenda for this meeting will include:
1. Review of the Policy Agenda Themes
2. Input from Board and Commission Chairs regarding their efforts to support policy goals
3. Direction from Council on items to be addressed
I look forward to working with you in supporting this ambitious policy agenda. If you have questions
about this process, please contact either your staff liaison, or Ann Turnquist, Council Policy Manager
in my office, 224-6094.
cc: Mayor and City Council Members
Service Directors
Board and Commission Staff Liaisons
300 LaPorte Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6505 • FAX (970) 224-6107
EXHIBIT A
Council Policy Agenda Themes and Outcomes
1997-99
Theme I: Planning for Land Use, the Environment and Transportation
The quality of our community is, in part, related to numerous policies and plans that impact the
physical form of the community, the public facilities that are available, and the public services
and programs that address a broad range of needs.
Over the next two-year period, a major thrust will be to implement City Plan. City Plan sets the
framework and direction for managing the expected growth of the community and providing the
infrastructure to sustain the quality of life in the community. Elements that will still require our
diligent efforts include: maintaining and renewing the vitality of our core areas; ensuring the
availability of affordable housing for community citizens; minimizing urban sprawl; annexing
areas that are or will be developed to urban levels.
Additional policy work will need to be done in the area of transportation as well as determining
how to implement adopted plans. A significant amount of work will need to be done related to
regional transportation planning, transit programs (including ways to finance expanded Transfort
service), facilities to support pedestrian and bicycle travel, and street maintenance, e.g.,
constructing streets that last longer and shifting the dependency from special 1/4-cent financing
to the General Fund for street maintenance.
Environmental policies and programs will continue to be a focus of public policies and services
in Fort Collins. In particular, we want to continue to improve our air quality and to incorporate
into the fabric of our community significant natural areas and other types of open lands.
Finally, we want to ensure that the public's investment in the City's facilities is sound, of good
quality, and is utilized in a way that is effective, efficient and addresses a wide variety of needs.
OUTCOMES:
CITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION:
In the next two years, City Council will make significant progress in implementing the
values stated in City Plan. Specific outcomes will include the following areas:
• The land use code will be implemented. Revisions will be made to improve its
effectiveness.
• The City will actively promote design excellence through its planning and
regulatory programs.
• The City will look for opportunities to showcase its efforts and partnerships in
City Plan implementation.
• The City will explore opportunities to implement aspects of the Civic Center Plan.
• The City will examine options for funding transit as recommended in City Plan.
1997-99 Council Policy Agenda —Revised June 17, 1997 Page 1
Theme 1: Planning for Land Use, the
Environment and Transportation —
continued
ENVIRONMENT:
The City will continue to focus on the community's value of being a good steward of our
environmental resources. The City will establish ties with the environmental community.
In the next two years, the City will focus on the following environmental issues:
• The City will ensure that its environmental plans are implemented in a coordinated
way, including:
✓ Air Quality Action Plan
✓ Natural Areas Policy Plan
✓ Parks and Recreation Policy Plan
✓ Water Quality Plan for drinking water and stormwater
✓ Poudre River Land Use Plan
✓ City Gateways, including Gateway Park
The City will pursue ways to deal with the impact of solid waste on our community.
The City will be proactive in acquiring natural areas and open lands and will work in
partnerships to make purchases.
TRANSPORTATION:
In the next two years, the City's transportation system will be improved as a balanced,
multi -modal system. Specific outcomes will include:
• The City will develop a long-term financing plan for the transportation system which
relies less on short-term funding, and more on a variety of long-term sources.
• A balanced transportation system will be further developed, including improvements
to the pedestrian system, bicycle facilities, transit services and the Mason Street
Multi -Modal Corridor.
• The City will examine new initiatives for addressing street maintenance needs,
including reducing street wear, districted trash hauling, and street construction
warranties.
• A secondary transportation network will be encouraged by bringing trail spurs from
new developments into the City trail system.
1997-99 Council Policy Agenda —Revised June 17,1997 Page 2
Tlienze 2: Sense of Community —
continued
DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY:
The City will incorporate and continuously improve a systematic method for gathering
community input on issues, values and direction, without the outreach being tied to
current issues. Important parts of this outcome will be a better public information
program, examination of campaign finance issues and the mail -in ballot.
DIVERSITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS:
The City will develop ways to make Fort Collins a more inclusive and welcoming
community for all people, especially through the development of a new Human Rights
Ordinance.
YOUTH:
The City will continue to work to ensure that youth in the community have positive
choices and activities in which to be involved.
POLICE SERVICES:
The City will enhance the role of the police department in ensuring a safe, inclusive
community. Areas of focus during the coming two years will include examining the
civilian review process, "calming" our streets, emphasizing community policing, and
using new enforcement techniques for speeding.
1997-99 Council Policy Agenda —Revised June 17,1997 Page 4
0
Theme 3: Economic Vitality and Sustainability
The future of Fort Collins' local economy is of key concern to the community. The financial
stability of our employers and the businesses that make up our economy has a significant influence
on the well-being of our residents. Other aspects of the economy which are of concern are the cost
of housing, and the community's place in the global economy.
Several major employers and a wide variety of small and medium-sized businesses make up our
business community. The effect that government has on each of these groups is of interest to the
City. The City can undertake a variety of economic policies to positively influence the local
economy. These include financial incentives evaluated in light of the Fiscal and Environmental
Impact Model; the new microloan program; the new business virtual incubator, and additional
opportunities that will build local capacity for creating jobs and generating economic activity.
Affordable housing is an important issue in our community. Housing which is available to residents
at all income levels is important because it ensures that people can both live and work in the
community. By ensuring this breadth of housing opportunities, we can reduce vehicle miles traveled
to and from housing in other communities, and its related impact on traffic congestion and air
quality. Housing at all income levels also contributes to the rich diversity that we enjoy in our
population.
OUTCOMES:
ECONOMIC POLICIES:
The City will re -focus its attentions on its economic policies. Specific outcomes of emphasis
will include:
• The City will improve its working relationship with the business community.
• The City will cooperate with other groups in defining ways in which to measure local
economic and environmental health, community well-being, and sustainability.
• The Fiscal and Environmental Impact Model will be developed and used in decision
making on issues such as financial incentives and local tax structure. The
community will have been involved in its development.
• City Council will consider creating an Economic Policy Advisory Board/Council of
Economic Advisors. Roles may include assessing the state of the local economy and
developing proposals for economic health and community sustainability.
• The virtual incubator and micro -loan programs will be developed, implemented and
evaluated annually.
• The City will take a leadership role in the community to support small businesses by
coordinating and sharing information about private sector activities and programs.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING:
The city will continue to support the development of affordable housing in the community.
A major focus will be to set specific, quantitative goals for affordable housing, and
techniques to achieve these goals, especially using tools learned though the Provincetowne
project.
1997-99 Council Policy Agenda —Revised June 17,1997 Page 5
Theme 4: Intergovernmental Cooperation:
Many problems faced by our community are not the City's alone to solve. They involve other
entities, including Larimer County, other cities and counties, Colorado State University, Front
Range Community College, Poudre and Thompson School Districts, Poudre Valley Hospital, and
the state and federal governments. Key issues which must be addressed cooperatively include
land use planning, regional transportation, the impact of growth on the region, solid waste
management and the role of our educational institutions on the future of the community.
Working together and building effective cooperative relationships will be key to the success of
the City in accomplishing its goals with these entities.
OUTCOMES:
The City will continue to develop and reinforce its relationships with Larimer County, our
neighboring cities, public schools and CSU. Specific areas of progress will include:
LARIMER COUNTY:
• City Plan and its concepts will be supported through cooperation with Larimer
County.
• The City and County will work together to examine the comparability of impact fees
and infrastructure needs.
• The City, County and City of Loveland will continue to work together toward a
regional solid waste management plan to address future landfill siting, recycling,
composting, and other waste reduction measures.
• The City will support the Mountain Back Drop program initiated by Larimer County.
REGIONAL PLANNING:
• The Northern Colorado regional partners will continue to work together on issues of
common concern, including transportation, land use, employment and utilities.
• Partners throughout Larimer and Weld counties will work together to implement the
vision defined in the Cache La Poudre-Big Thompson Rivers Legacy Project and to
develop the regional heritage plans called for in the federal Poudre River Corridor
Act.
• The City will continue to support the North Front Range Transportation and Air
Quality Planning Council.
EDUCATION:
Regional cooperation will be developed and enhanced with schools and universities.
Specific areas of focus will include:
• Completing cooperative projects with Poudre School District, using shared funding.
• Developing a business incubator with CSU and FRCC. (CSURF)
• Looking for opportunities to develop volunteerism with CSU.
1997-99 Council Policy Agenda —Revised June 17,1997 Page 6
Theme S: Financial Policies
Long-term financial planning is a key policy concern for the City Council. Fiscal responsibility
for the organization requires that the City review several key financial policies. The City's
revenue sources are an area of key concern as we review our dependence on sales and use taxes
and user fees. Balancing these sources and ensuring that they are appropriate to meeting the
community's long term financial goals will be important.
The City must also continue to evaluate whether development fees adequately compensate for the
impact of new development on the City's capital resources. With the adoption of Capital
Expansion Fees in 1996, significant progress was made toward this goal, and a review of these
fee levels may be appropriate.
Adequate revenue to fund basic and necessary services such as transportation services will
continue to be a key concern to the community. Street maintenance, traffic management,
parking, pedestrian and bike facilities and the transit system are all key components of this
system.
OUTCOMES:
The City will develop strategies for addressing its future fiscal health by creating long-
term financial plans in the following areas:
• Permanent sources of funding for Transportation Services.
• Review the level of Development Impact Fees and make annual automatic
adjustments.
• Examine the City's overall revenue policies.
• Look for ways to measure healthy community financial metrics.
-99
June 17,
7
Theme 6: Utilities and Telecommunications
The coming years will bring significant challenges to our community as we deal with utility
deregulation and changes in the telecommunications industry. It will be important for the City to
anticipate these challenges and position itself to act in the best interests of the community.
Electric, water, wastewater and natural gas utilities are all faced with changing regulations and a
new legislative environment. There are possible opportunities in the areas of electric,
telecommunications and natural gas to lower customer costs and provide better local service.
Along with these issues will come threats and opportunities in utility support of the General
Fund.
The Water Utilities look to the future by updating its master plans and regional planning studies.
Financing of future capital needs will be an issue of continuing concern, especially regarding
plant investment fees and the funding of the Water Treatment Master Plan and the Dry Creek
stormwater diversion project.
By defining in advance the City's roles and responsibilities in promoting technology
infrastructure, and by acting on those responsibilities, Fort Collins will keep itself in the
forefront of ensuring quality services to our customers. Business alliances between electric
utilities and telecommunications
changes come about.
OUTCOMES:
ELECTRIC UTILITY:
companies will be an exciting avenue to explore as these
The Citywill position itself for the coming deregulation of the Electric Utility Industry.
Alternatives to the recently defeated charter amendments will be examined and the City
will work with Platte River Power Authority to develop cooperative actions.
WATER UTILITIES:
The Water Utilities will adopt its updated master plans and focus on water conservation
efforts and water supply strategies for Northern Colorado.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS:
The City will consider a more active role in the telecommunications industry. Areas of
particular focus will include telecommunications infrastructure, business alliances to
lower community costs, and cellular antennae siting.
1997-99 Council Policy Agenda —Revised June 17,1997 Page 8
Other Areas of Council Interest 1997-99
• Enhance the City's legislative tracking and activism program
• Support the creation of a national Steady State Conference
• Work with local arts agencies in creating a Congress of Arts
• Explore developing a Sister Cities program
1997-99 Council Policy Agenda —Revised June 17,1997 Page 9
City of Fort Collins
August 4, 1997
and
and Inspection Division
LEGAL NOTICE
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a request for a modification of the Zoning Code of
the City of Fort Collins.
The procedure for a person requesting a modification of the Zoning Code is to make application
and appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals. This Board has been established to hear
cases, where by reason of exceptional situations or conditions, the strict application of the
regulation would result in peculiar and practical difficulties or exceptional undue hardship upon
the owner of such property, provided that the granting of a variance would not result in a
substantial detriment to the public good.
A variance of Code Section(s) Section 3.2.2(k)(2)(a) has been requested by Sonja Stephens,
Larimer County Facilities Department, for the following described property, 1525 Blue Spruce.
The variance would increase the maximum allowed number of parking spaces from 233 to 256,
in order to allow 23 new parking spaces to be added to the parking lot for the 2 Larimer County
office buildings located at 1501 and 1525 Blue Spruce Dr.
This item will appear on the Zoning Board of Appeals agenda as Appeal No. 2198.
As an adjacent property owner, your input would be appropriate in the consideration of the
variance request.
The hearing on this appeal will be held at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, August 14, 1997, in the
Council Chambers at 300 Laporte Avenue. Those interested may appear at this meeting, or if
unable to attend may submit comments in writing. Meeting sites are generally accessible to
handicapped persons. If you are disabled and need special assistance to participate, please call
221-6760.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact Peter Barnes, Zoning Administrator
at 221-6760.
Peter Barnes, Zoning Administrator
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6760
Theme Z: Sense of Community
Fort Collins is characterized by people who care about and are very active in their community.
As the municipal government, we want to continue to look for ways to improve how citizens can
participate in meaningful ways in shaping public policies and programs --ways to move toward a
more deliberative approach of democratic governance. Issues that are likely to be addressed
include the voting process (mail -in balloting v. polling process) and campaign finance reform.
Neighborhoods are an essential building block in our community and we want to continue to
search for ways to enhance neighborhoods solving their own problems, improving relationships
among those who live and work in neighborhoods, and ensuring a sense of safety within the
neighborhoods.
It is also important for people of all backgrounds to feel welcome and respected in our
community. Work will continue to update the City's human rights and diversity policies and
practices. The City has a role in supporting the children and young people of our community --
through our recreational programs, employment opportunities, programs that address special
needs (e.g., youth at risk), and the Youth Advisory Board.
Finally, we want to work with other local organizations and interested citizens to cultivate and
underscore the importance of Fort Collins as a learning community.
OUTCOMES:
NEIGHBORHOODS:
The City will develop its neighborhood support programs with the following goals in
mind:
• Neighborhoods should be empowered to address their problems.
• Neighborhoods should have the resources available to them to help "turn themselves
around," and revitalize themselves.
• Strong ties should exist between the Neighborhood Resources Office and Police to
enhance neighborhood policing.
• School buildings should be increasingly available as community centers.
RENTAL PROPERTIES:
The City will develop ways to reduce the negative impacts of rental properties on
neighborhoods by focusing on the symptoms of rental property problems, and developing
effective methods for both neighbors and the City to address the problems. Property
owners will be held responsible for problems which arise in their rental units, and the
City will develop ways to address rental units which are not approved by the building
code.
1997-99 Council Policy Agenda —Revised June 17,1997 Page 3