HomeMy WebLinkAboutWater Board - Minutes - 03/16/1984MINUTES
Water Board
March 16, 1984
MEMBERS PRESENT Norm Evans, Henry Caulfield, Ev Richardson, Bernie Cain,
Ray Glabach, Dave Stewart, Tom Sanders, Mort Bittinger
(alt), Mary Lou Smith (alt)
STAFF PRESENT Mike Smith, Roger Krempel, Dennis Bode, Ben Alexander,
Andy Pineda, Linda Burger
MEDIA Mark Radke, KCOL
MEMBERS ABSENT Ward Fischer, Neil Grigg, Tom Moore (excused)
The meeting was opened by Vice Chairman Norm Evans. The following items
were discussed:
Minutes
The minutes of the February 27, 1984 meeting were approved.
on Water Treatment Plant No. 1
Mike Smith related that on Tuesday, March 13th, the City Council reviewed
the staff's proposal for Water Treatment Plant No. 1, and found it to be
favorable. The next step will be to begin the process of selecting an
engineer for the 20 mgd expansion at Water Treatment Plant No. 2.
Update on Rate and Drought Studies
Dennis Bode announced that the consultants for both studies have been
selected. Stewart and Associates was chosen to coordinate the rate study.
Sub -contractors will include EDAW, Inc., CH2M-Hill, and Pat Graham; each
will be responsible for a different aspect of the study. Resource
Consultants will conduct the drought study. Mr. Bode explained the scope
of the rate study as follows:
1. Obtain information
. Data from existing systems
. Customer survey
• Public workshop
2. Verify projected customer demands
3. Determine "green lawn" criteria
4. Determine revenue requirements
5. Analyze cost -of -service for customer classes
6. Analyze cost-effectiveness of metering
7. Provide water rate computer model
Water Board Minutes
March 16, 1984
Page 2
Since Dave Stewart, a member of the Water Board, will be the project manager
for the rate study, he distributed letters to the Board addressing a potential
conflict of interest. His letter stated that he would abstain from any
discussions on the water rate study in his capacity as a Board member. The
letter also related that the City Charter does not restrict members of boards
and commissions from doing work for the City while retaining their
memberships.
Henry Caulfield informed the Board that Colorado State law considers failure
to disclose as a conflict of interest. Thus, failure to disclose is an abuse
of public office which can be interpreted as detrimental to the public
interest. Dave Stewart has disclosed fully his potential conflict. Ev
Richardson and Henry Caulfield proposed that Mr. Stewart be allowed to
participate in Board discussions in his role as a consultant when information
about the study is being discussed. He should not take part when the
discussion involves the adequacy of the project. Assistant City Attorney Paul
Eckman agreed that Mr. Stewart should be allowed .to participate as long as the
discussion does not involve proprietary or pecuniary matters. Mr. Stewart
should not be allowed to offer any suggestions or comments which could
increase the scope of study and thus add to the cost.
Questions about the survey portion of the study were answered by Dave Stewart
and Henry Caulfield. Mr. Stewart explained that the first part of the survey
will be statistical and the second part opinion. It is hoped that the survey
will provide information on some important issues that have been around for a
long time.
Next, Dennis Bode explained the objectives of the Drought Study as listed
below:
1. Determine river drought characteristics
2. Estimate imported water supply during drought
3. Determine water yields of various sources
4. Analyze effects of City demands on various supply scenarios
5. Analyze various drought supply strategies
Mr. Bode said that on March 20th, staff will be going to City Council for
funding for both studies, and on April 3rd there will be a second reading of
the ordinance. Mike Smith added that the staff will seek approval of the
contracts on April 3rd also. Following the appropriation of funds and the
approval of the contracts, the studies will begin.
Mary Lou Smith commented about a sensitive correlation involving both studies.
She expressed the concern that, from the public's perspective, the timing of
these studies may be related to Anheuser-Busch. Ms. Smith suggested that the
announcement of these studies be made with the proper explanations so that the
public does not perceive of them as indications of potential water shortages
for the City. Ms. Smith stressed that the announcement of these studies must
be well thought out. Mike Smith related how the studies evolved. He read a
portion of the resolution passed by City Council which said: "The Water Board
and City staff should proceed to develop a comprehensive water conservation
program for the purpose of delaying future water plant expansion by reducing
peak day demands."
Water Board Minutes
March 16, 1984
Page 3
Ray Glabach pointed out that we must look at the issue from both sides of the
coin. On one hand, the City is trying to convince people that there is no
water problem related to the Anheuser-Busch question. On the other hand, we
have been saying for years that we live in a semi -arid climate and that we
need to think about water shortages. Henry Caulfield responded that these two
studies have been contemplated long before A-B appeared on the scene. They
were simply thought of as desirable management studies. Historical records
will prove that, he added. Mr. Caulfield emphasized that the City should plan
well enough to avoid a crisis -type water situation in times of drought. Mr.
Glabach agreed but pointed out that the difference with the A-B situation is
the visibility.
Ev Richardson offered the viewpoint that A-B will not be consuming 4200 acre-
feet of water as is being implied. The consumptive use is more in the area of
1000 acre-feet. The other portion goes back into the system for agriculture
or "anybody else downstream." He added that the amount of water consumed is
no more than is consumed on the present farm. Furthermore, he contends that
"if farmers could make a living from agriculture, there wouldn't be so many
people leaving their farms."
Mary Lou Smith commented that the water issue is so complicated that it is
difficult to explain. She usually tells people who ask her that the City
needs to have sufficient storage for the population that has been projected
for a given time whether A-B is here or not. Roger Krempel assured the Board
that he and Mike Smith will handle any publicity for these studies with
careful thought and planning.
Meadow Creek Reservoir
Mike Smith explained that in January, Roger Krempel had received a letter from
Daniel Kaup inquiring whether the City of Fort Collins was interested in
buying another 550 acre-feet of storage in Meadow Creek Reservoir. Since that
time, Dennis Bode has had an opportunity to analyze the situation, and has
addressed it in a memo that was distributed to Water Board members. Mr. Bode
explained further the table that was included in the memo. He talked about
the diversion conditions in an extremely dry, a dry, an average, and a wet
year. Mr. Bode concluded that, based on existing data and the present
analysis, the staff believes that the 1200 acre-feet of storage capacity that
we currently own, is adequate and the benefits of having additional capacity
is marginal. After several years of operation, however, we may want to re-
evaluate the need for additional storage capacity in Meadow Creek Reservoir.
It should be noted that this potential source of supply will be explored in
the drought study. Following comments and questions, Dave Stewart moved that
the Water Board accept the staff's recommendation with the stipulation that
the staff investigates the price compared with CBT water and that they also
work with the Engineering Committee on any further information. Ev Richardson
seconded the motion; it carried unanimously.
Committee Reports
Dave Stewart announced that the Education Committee is progressing with the
local water work sheets for the fourth grade. The next task for the committee
is to prepare a slide show on local water. Mary Lou Smith, a member of the
Water Board Minutes
March 16, 1984
Page 4
committee, added that the City intends to replace Captain Hydro with the
new program because Captain Hydro originated in northern California, and is
not relevant to our local situation. Molly Nortier explained that the
department is considering using, for the fourth grade, the AWWA workbooks
called the "Water Story," to provide a broad look at water. The two
programs would compliment each other.
New Business
Roger Krempel said that he had received a letter from Senator Bill
Armstrong advising us that there is Federal legislation requiring permits
for irrigation ditches crossing Federal lands. Senator Armstrong is
planning to introduce legislation to alleviate that problem. Assistant
City Attorney Paul Eckman and the staff have been investigating the
situation and plan to respond. Mr. Eckman explained that the Senator's
legislation has not yet been drafted, but that his aide will send a copy to
us for analysis and comment when the draft is completed. Essentially, the
legislation will exempt all ditches, old and new, from the permitting
requirements of the act. It was suggested that perhaps a ceiling on how
much could be charged for permits should be included. Henry Caulfield said
that, historically, these permits have not had a charge attached. Senator
Armstrong has sent copies of his letter to the Secretary of the Interior
and the Secretary of Agriculture asking them to refrain from exercising
their rights under this law until he can get his legislation going.
Roger Krempel informed the Board, as a matter of interest, that last spring
during the runoff, an estimated 33 years of water supply for the City was
lost from the basin based on what we use. That is approximately 625,000
acre-feet lost.
Dave Stewart asked if there was any news about the Poudre River designa-
tion. Ben Alexander said he had heard that the participants from both
sides were still meeting and working long hours to draft an agreement
acceptable to both sides. Apparently Rep. Hank Brown has returned to
Washington and will await the results.
Roger Krempel said that some board and commission members who had
participated in a Boards and Commissions workshop last year have expressed
an interest in a follow-up session. Mr. Krempel said that he would inform
the Board if and when something is arranged.
Chairman Ward Fischer asked the secretary to remind Board members to be
prepared to review and discuss the Water Board policies at the next
meeting.
The videotape on "Fort Collins Water" was shown. It was produced by the
City last summer.
Since there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:35 p.m.
7y' r�ti� YJr,���✓ _
Water Board Secretary