HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning And Zoning Board - Minutes - 03/22/19821
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MINUTES
MARCH 22, 1982
Board Present: Barbara Purvis, Dave Gilfillan, Dennis Georg, Gary Ross, Ed
Stoner, Don Crews, Tim Dow, Ingrid Simpson
Staff Present: Ken Waido, Cathy Chianese, Sherry Albertson -Clark, Joe Frank,
Mauri Rupel, Linda Gula
Legal Representative: Pete Ruggiero
Meeting called to order 6:30 p.m.
AGENDA REVIEW:
11. #10-82
301 East Magnolia R-H Conversion - Continued to 4/26/82
19. #12-82
325 East mulberry PUD - Preliminary & Final - Withdrawn by
Applicant
20. #7-82
Collindale Business Park Master Plan - Continued to 5/24/82
21. #7-82A
Collindale Business Park PUD First Phase - Preliminary
Continued to 5/24/82
22. #24-80C
Park Central PUD First Phase -Final - Continued to 4/26/82
23. #69-788
Greenbriar Condominiums PUD - Final - Continued to 4/26/82
CONSENT AGENDA:
1.
Approval of minutes of February 22, 1982
2. #54-80E
Drake Crossing Shopping Center PUD Phase One - Final
Request for final approval of a 14.15-ac shopping center with
115,717.7 sf of commercial space located at the northwest
corner of Taft Hill and Drake Road, zoned B-P, Planned Business
Applicant: John Wheeler, c/o ZVFK Architects/Planners, 218
West Mountain, Fort Collins, CO 80521
3. #95 -81B
Seven Lakes Business Park PUD First Phase - Final
Request for final approval of a 9.49-ac business park with
94,000 sf of office, warehouse and manufacturing uses, located
north of East Prospect Road, approximately 1/4-mile east of
P Z 3/22/82
Page 2
Timberline Road, zoned i-p, Planned Industrial.
Applicant: The Neenan Company, c/o Gefroh Associates, 555 S.
Howes, Suite 100, Fort Collins, CO 80521.
Note: There were no requests to remove items from the Consent Agenda.
Georg: Moved to approve the Consent Agenda.
Gilfillan: Second.
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
4. #18-82 3820 South County Road 11 Rezoning
Request to rezone 2.62-ac from T-Transition to R-L-P, Low
Density Residential, located east of Timerline Road, approxi-
mately 1/4-mile south of Horsetooth Road.
Applicant: William H. and Linda S. Webster, c/o Mitchell and
Company, P.O. Box 1208, Fort Collins, CO 80522.
Frank: Gave a staff report recommending approval.
Chuck Mabry: Representative of Mitchell and Co. Would be available to
answer questions.
Stoner: Moved to recommend to City Council approval of the 3820 South
County Road 11 Rezoning.
Georg: Second.
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
5. #29-80A Oak Ridge Rezoning
Request to rezone property containing 85-ac to amend certain
conditions placed on the property under its existing zoning,
located on the southest corner of Harmony Road and Lemay Avenue
zoned conditional R-P.
Applicant: City of Fort Collins
Frank: Gave a staff report recommending approval.
Georg: Moved to recommend to City Council approval of the Oak Ridge
Rezoning.
Gilfillan: Second.
Pi& Z 3/22/82
Page 3
•
Vote:
Motion carried 7-0.
6. #54-80F
Fairbrooke Rezoning
Request to rezone 35.9-ac from T-Transition to R-P, Planned
Residential, located south of West Prospect Road and approxi-
mately 1/2-mile west of Taft Hill Road.
Applicant: Wheeler Realty Company, c/o Lester M. Kaplan,
Planning Consultant, 528 S. Howes, Fort Collins, CO 80521.
Chianese:
Gave a staff report recommending approval.
Les Kaplan:
Project Planning Consultant. Summarized how the zoning
process occurs under the LDGS. Stated that the nature of the
zone being asked for required going through the LDGS, at which
time land uses and the design characteristics would be
determined. Noted that they had asked for the R-P zoning
specifically because they felt that that classification was
similar to the other classifications in the area.
Terry Gorman:
Area resident. Expressed some confusion about different zon-
ings and questioned if single-family, churches, and condomin-
iums could be built.
Waido:
Stated that the R-L zone does not allow condominium development
The R-L zone is limited to two uses, single familiy uses and
churches, or any use proposed under the LDGS. The R-P zone is
limited to any use allowed in the R-L zone or any use proposed
under the LDGS. Through the LDGS an applicant can propose any
land use on any piece of property in the City.
Jack Smith:
Area resident. Expressed opposition to the entire project.
Stated his concerns as being heavy population and school impact
(Bauder at capacity already). Submitted a petition of people
opposed to the project. (Exhibit AA)
Gary Hall:
Stated that there was a large contingency present relative to
this particular project and that the rezoning was not their
major concern.
Stoner:
Moved to recommend to City Council approval of the Fairbrooke
Rezoning.
Gilfillan:
Second.
Vote:
Motion carried 7-0.
DISCUSSION AGENDA:
7. #54-80G
Fairbrooke PUD Master Plan
P, & Z 3/22/82
Page 4 •
Request for master plan approval of a 101.25-ac PUD with 699
multi -family units, daycare center, and church, located south
of Prospect Road and west of Taft Hill Road, zoned R-P, Planned
Residential.
Applicant: Wheeler Realty Company, c/o Lester M. Kaplan,
Planning Consultant, 528 S. Howes, Fort Collins, CO 80521.
Chianese:
Gave a staff report recommending approval. Noted also that a
neighborhood meeting had been held with area residents on March
16, 1982.
Les Kaplan:
Project Planning Consultant. Stated that the master plan had
been submitted with the objective of determining general land
uses on the property. Noted that this was not the final
hearing that would take place, each phase would have to go
through substantial additional review and a public hearing
process. The characteristics of development in each of those
phases would be determined on what the general public attitude
is at the time, what the ordinances are at the time, what the
market place is like at the time, and what the preference is of
the part of the applicant.
Stoner:
Questioned where the relocation of the Pleasant Valley Lake and
Canal would be.
Kaplan:
Pointed out that it would run along the daycare center.
Bob Lucas:
Representative for Wheeler Realty. Stated that with other
development that is planned in the surrounding area, the densi-
ty in the area can change significantly over the next 20 years
depending upon how the property is developed, the economic
conditions of the City, and what new industry is attracted to
Fort Collins. The reason for the master plan was to determine
what could be done with the property. Stated that they have no
intention of developing the area ---they have more property now
then they can develop in the next five years with conditions
staying as they are.
F.W.(Bill) Michael: Area resident. Discussed the history of the farms in the area.
Stated that the master plan had not addressed the problem of
what to do with the runoff after it is detained. Expressed
concerns about runoff and surface flow through his property.
Stated that he was in a position to legally and physically
prevent anymore drainage from the area that is proposed for
development.
Gary Hall: Area resident. Acting as representative of the people of the
neighborhood meeting. (Approximately 75 people stood as a show
of concern for this project.)Stated that they were not opposed
to the land being developed, but that the amount of time that
P-& Z 3/22/82
Page 5
Pi
they were given to absorb the master plan and 1st Phase, in
addition to the LOGS, was not adequate. Stated that they were
not aware that this meeting was going to take place up to two
weeks prior to this meeting; and that the name change from
Worthington to Fairbrooke caused much confusion to many
residents. Another major concern was the impact on the school
and would liked to have met with a School Board member.
Further noted concerns about the daycare facility and the
reconfiguration of the canal to run along the daycare facility;
unanswered questions relating to the detention center, and the
reconfiguration of Hampshire Road.
Ross:
Commented that he had frequently questioned the figures that
the School Administration had supplied the Board, but that they
have proven to be relatively accurate.
Hall:
Stated that the neighborhood would like to discuss with the
school board the impact of the project on the school.
Ross:
Stated that the problems of bussing and School Board policy
needed to be taken up with the School Board, not this Board.
John Snyder:
Area resident. Expressed concern about the density and water
problems in the area. Felt that what was presented was not
fact. Urged a delay of 30 days so that the residents could
compare the information that the City provided and find some
answers for themselves. Felt that they had not had enough time
to answer their own questions.
Ross:
Stated that that was why this Board, City staff, Legal staff,
and the Engineering staff were here. Stated that one of the
beauties of the LOGS is that you look at master plans (in the
past that was not required) and that you could get a total
picture of what is planned for a large piece of land.
Snyder:
Questioned where the LOGS is available. Stated that the
neighborhood had the impression that they were not in print.
Waido:
Stated that when the Guidance System was adopted staff printed
what was considered to be an adequate supply. As revisions
started to come about a reprinting was done and those were
exhausted. Only a few were left when this item was submitted.
At the time when the neighborhood became concerned we acutally
did not have any copies left. We ran off some xerox copies for
the neighborhood, however, we did not run off copies for every
person in the neighborhood who was concerned.
Snyder:
Requested a 30 day posponement to review the LOGS and the
master plan.
P, & Z 3/22/82
Page 6
Susan Reed: Area resident. Stated that she had had some problem in getting
a copy of the LOGS, she had been made to wait over the weekend
to receive a copy. Felt that they needed more time to absorb
the master plan and the LOGS. Stated that it would be nice if
there could be some use found for the Brown Farm as it stands.
Suggested looking into using Jim Brown's house and farm for use
as a facility for children or perhaps a communal farm. Or,
perhaps, the individual owners or renters around the area could
keep an animal --- some geese, a pony ---something that could be a
little more homey or rural.
Felt that the LOGS does have some merit in being able to see an
entire plan for an area. Stated, however, that the clustering
theory did not work well for all people. Noted that many
people prefer privacy rather than living in a cluster closer to
services.
Bob Lucas: Stated that if the neighborhood would like to meet with the
developer again that they would be willing to do that. Stated
that they had no problem with tabling the items for 30 days.
Waido: Stated that staff concurred with the request to table.
Stoner: Moved to table Fairbrooke PUD Master Plan and Fairbrooke PUD
First Phase - Preliminary until 4/26/82.
Dow: Second.
Votes
Motion carried 7-0.
Ross: Encouraged staff and the neighborhood in working together to
work out the problems. Also announced that there would be a
public hearing on the LOGS on 3/29/82, 6:30 p.m., Council
Chambers.
Gilfillan: Indicated to staff to try to provide copies of the LOGS.
Stoner: Encouraged the problems with the detention ponds to be worked
out. Agreed with the delay because the neighborhood was ap-
proaching this in a positive manner.
Richard Speth: Area resident. Questioned what 6.9 units translated to in
households.
Lucas: Responded seven to one - each unit is a household.
Waido: Requested that the Board consider item #10 next to give Cathy
Chianese time to meet with the Fairbrooke people in the lobby.
Pa Z 3/22/82
Page
e 7
10. #27-82 Schrock Group Home Special Review
Request to convert a single-family residence located at 2425
Merion Court in the Brown Farm Subdivision, to a group home.
The property is presently zoned R-L, Low Density Residential,
and group home use requires special review by the Planning and
Zoning Board.
Applicant: William SChrock, c/o Linda Kinyon, Hansen Realty,
Inc., First National Tower Building, Fort Collins, CO.
Waido:
Gave a staff report recommending approval.
Ross:
Questioned if there were a desire to change the type of group
home to perhaps children, or even increasing the number what
would happen.
Waido:
Stated that the request for three elderly persons was the only
use this property could be used for. Any change in status for
another type of group home would have to come back through the
Board for public hearing.
Irene Neary:
Area resident. Stated that she did not object to having adults
live in a group home. Questioned if this home was vacated
could it be used for juvenile delinquents or drug addicts?
Ross:
Stated that any change in status of the home would have to come
to public hearing again and that people within 500' would be
notified.
Georg:
Moved to approve the Schrock Group Home Special Review subject
to the condition that additional residents be limited to three
adults.
Gilfillan:
Second.
Vote:
Motion carried 7-0.
12. #11-82
1715 W. Mountain Avenue Expansion of a Non -Conforming Use
Request for approval of an expansion of a non -conforming use
for a 1,000 sf addition for equipment and vehicle storage and
shop area, located at the Housing Authority Office, 1715 W.
Mountain Avenue, zoned R-L, Low Density Residential.
Applicant: Fort Collins Housing Authorlity, 1715 W. Mountain
Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521
Albertson -Clark: Gave a staff report recommending approval.
Note: Applicant not present.
P•Z 3/22/82
Page 8
.
John Messineo:
Area resident. Submitted a petition of people in the area
opposed to the project. (Exibit A) Expressed concern about
taking more parkland to build a facility for storage. Felt
that another site for the facility should be sought. Also
expressed concern about future expansion on the present site
and the added traffic to the area.
Bill Clothier:
Area resident. Stated that some residents did not receive
notice. Expressed his objection to more parkland being used
for development and expressed concerns about higher traffic,
increased parking problems, and vandalism. Encouraged develop-
ing a storage facility at the Wood Street location.
Georg:
Pointed out that the area for the proposed expansion was al-
ready leased to the Housing Authority so it would be exclued in
some forms legally from use as parkland.
Dow:
Questioned what would happen to the storage facility if the
Housing Authority moved or ceased to exist.
Waido:
Responded that the property was zoned R-L and any use would
have to be in conformance with R-L, or would have to come in
under the Guidance System.
Note:
General discussion ensued between Board members and staff
concerning the use, possible expansion, traffic and related
problems.
Georg:
Questioned why the City was in the business of leasing
parkland, however, stated that the issue was land use and
whether or not this non -conforming use should be expanded. Felt
that this 3500 sf useage of this land was not high intensity
and that the Board does have control over future expansion of
non -conforming
uses.
Crews
Moved to approve the 1715 W. Mountain Avenue Expansion of a
Non -Conforming Use.
Second.
Stoner: Felt that the storage facility would be an asset rather than
negative to the whole area.
Vote: Motion carried 6-1. (Dow voting no)
Dow: Stated the reason for the no vote was that he didn't believe
that we should be expanding non -conforming uses in this area.
Felt that if the facility required more space, they should find
a better spot to locate it.
P.& Z 3/22/82
Page 9
9. #54-80D Valley Forge PUD - Preliminary
Request for preliminary approval of 46 multi -family units on
5.31-ac located west of South Taft Hill Road approximately
1/8-mile north of Drake Road, zoned B-P, Planned Business, and
R-P, Planned Residential.
Applicant: John Wheeler, c/o Shiloh Designers/Contractors,
1620 Azalea Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80526
Chianese: Gave a staff report recommending approval.
Fred Babich: Contractor for Valley Forge. Explained that the development was
for cost/energy efficient housing project incorporating
active and passive solar useage. Noted that extensive land-
scaping provided a harmonious transition area. Felt that the
project proposed would be a compatible addition to the Brown
Farm area.
Al Curtis: Area resident. Questioned the change from the original plan.
Expressed concern about the massing as far as the building and
parking was concerned. Felt that the parking was not
adequately buffered and was concerned about the scale of the
project. Felt that the whole project was not in character with
the surrounding neighborhood.
Note: General discussion ensued between the Board, staff, and the
applicant concerning traffic on Valley Forge, if there would
rental units, parking problems, landscaping, and possible
problems with the adjacent Safeway project.
Ross: Commented that he felt there were too many units being put into
a piece of real estate. Stated that he felt it was a case of
going back into a project that was designed for a different
adaptation of building and that it is being retrofitted for
solar. Felt that it did not do justice to the real estate or
the neighborhood.
Georg: Felt that the scale was a problem and that more buffering could
be required.
Dow: Felt that some kind of multi -family use would have to go in to
buffer between the commercial area to the south and the
residential area to the north. Also expressed some reservat-
ions about the landscaping.
Dow: Moved to deny Valley Forge PUD - Preliminary.
Crews: Second.
P .& Z 3/22/82
Page 10
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
Purvis: Agreed that there was not an appropriate transition between
this development and the single-family.
13. #8-82 Fox Meadows Business Park Master Plan
Request for master plan aproval of a 15.22-ac business/indust-
rial park, located at the southeast corner of Horsetooth and
Timberline Roads, zoned R-M-P, Medium Density Planned Resident-
ial.
Applicant: Bill Tiley, c/o ZVFK Architects/Planners, 218 W.
Mountain, Fort Collins, CO 80521.
Frank: Gave a staff report recommending approval.
Eldon Ward: Discussed the natural alignment of the roads and water lines.
Explained the justification of putting business/warehouse
directly adjacent to single-family detached housing as relating
to the LDGS, and land uses being made compatible through site
treatment as being an important factor. Stated that he felt
that there was some question as to the marketability in terms
of housing and that they had tried to address it as an
employment center fitting with the surrounding land uses.
Purvis: Expressed some concern about access from Phase 1 to Phase 2 and
the landscaping along Timberline in Phase 2.
Bob McIntyre: Area resident. Stated that when he moved into the area he was
told that Bighorn would not be extended. Felt that the area
could become dangerous for small children because of the higher
traffic. Did not think it should be necessary to extend Bighorn
Road.
Ed Zdenek: ZVFK. Responded that that Bighorn Road was programmed as part
of the Fox Meadows Subdivision to be an extension. Felt that
the business area could act as an outlet for traffic.
John Loomis: Area resident. Felt that the area might be better reserved for
some sort of clustering or high density housing.
Lou Samsa: Area resident. Stated vehement opposition to the project. Felt
that it was just a dumping of a warehouse project in the
backyard of a residential area. Felt that there should be a
greenbelt area.
Tom Watson: Area resident. Expressed opposition to the project and stated
his major concerns as being decreased property valuations and
the increased traffic with resulting danger to the children.
P. $ Z 3/22/82
Page 11
! .
Jackie Ross:
Area resident. Questioned whether the warehouses would be the
best use for the land. Stated concern over water problems and
traffic problems, especially concerning the intersection of
Horsetooth and Timberline.
Margaret Nelson:
Area resident. Expressed concern over what type of manufact-
uring would be going in and possible problems with noise,
time -shifts, and lighting.
Eldon Ward:
Explained that the warehousing would only be an accessory use.
Stated that they were willing
to commit to a substantial
landscape buffer between the residential and the office use.
Pointed out that all phases and the specifics of those phases
would have to come back through this Board.
Georg:
Pointed out that trying to visualize Phase 2, at this point,
was very difficult without having the specifics of the land-
scaping, lighting, or the exact distribution of uses. Explain-
ed how the master plan and phasing process progresses.
Paul Crilly:
Area resident. Expressed opposition to the project. Felt
there should be more concern for a manufacturing site close to
a residential area. Expressed concern for the manufacturing
building blocking his solar access.
Barry Truesdell:
Representative of the Union Pacific Railroad. Stated that their
track is roughly 1/4 mile west on Horsetooth Road and,
obviously, this development will increase traffic on this cros-
sing.
Mike Thornton:
Area resident. Expressed opposition. Felt that with R-L-P
zoning surrounding the property, that this was inconsistent
with the surrounding area. Felt it should be left as is, or
developed as single-family, or, a green -belt would be even
better.
Paul Lambolt:
Area resident. Felt the Board should take a second look at
this. Stated that there is a definite problem with runoff flow
in that area. Stated that this project does not fit the area.
Waido:
Clarified that the Master Street Plan adopted by City Council
two years ago designated Timberline Road as a major arterial---
Horsetooth Road is designated as being an arterial street.
Georg:
Commented that the public input had encouraged the Board to
take a second look at this project. Stated that a second look
would be taken when the specific design is submitted. Felt that
o Ong at this as a master plan, that this does conform with
the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Moved to approve the Fox Meadows Business Park Master Plan.
Gilfillan:
Second.
Stoner: Stated that he was empathetic to the citizens and expressed
some concern about whether the buffering could be done ade-
quately between the residential and the warehouse area.
PZ 3/22/82 •
Page 12
Crews: Encouraged the Board to take a hard look when the phasing comes
back in.
Ross: Stated that buffering from residential to some other sort of
use does not necessarily have to go from single-family, to
townhouses to condominiums. Buffering can be done more
abruptly than that if it is done with proper planning. When
phase 2 is done it will have to be done then.
Purvis: Expressed concern about the plan's capability of dispelling the
concerns that the people have, but since this is the master
plan she was in support.
Vote: Motion carried 6-1 (Stoner voting no).
14. #8-82A Fox Meadows Business Park PUD First Phase - Preliminary
Request for preliminary approval of a 43,500 sf health club and
exterior tennis courts on a 4.33-ac site, located east of
Timberline Road approximately 900-ft south of Horsetooth Road,
zoned R-M-P, Medium Densitiy Planned Residential.
Applicant: Bill Tiley, c/o ZVFK Architects/Planners, 218 W.
Mountain, Fort Collins, CO 80521
Frank:
Gave a staff report recommending approval.
Ward:
Applicant. Would be available to answer questions.
Stoner:
Questioned if it were mandatory for Bighorn Road to go all the
way through.
Rupel:
Stated that the subdivision has to have an exit onto Timberline
Road and he felt it was very necessary.
Note:
General discussion ensued between the Board, the applicant, and
the staff concerning lighting of the tennis courts, the height
of the structures, the type of metal roofing to be used, scale,
traffic, and landscaping.
Vic Cooper:
Area resident. Stated that they had been told by the realtor
that Big Horn Road would not be extended. Stated that the
recreation center itself did not seem to be a problem, his
major concern was the higher traffic going into the area.
Lou Samsa:
Area resident. Felt that the recreation area did not meet the
needs of the residents in the area. Felt that the recreation
should be geared more toward small children. Felt that this
project did not alleviate the traffic in the area.
Waido: Clarified that this particular project is a private enterprise
operation,there are no City tax monies going in for the build-
ing of this facility. Also clarified the City's policies about
parks.
P & Z 3/22/82
Page 13
i is
Bob McIntyre:
Area resident. Again questioned the existence of the Master
Plan and questioned if a copy of the Master Street Plan could
be made available to him. Questioned how changes to the plan
might be made. Felt that you could not complain about the
Master Plan at the time it was approved because there were no
specifics to deal with.
Ross:
Stated that there are some specifics that go into the plan, and
that is the overall traffic flow. Stated that most subdiv-
isions they try to access through the subdivision on more than
one arterial street.
Bob McIntyre:
Recommended that a study be,done on why that road is needed.
Rupel:
Stated that one of the reasons was not only to provide access
to whatever might be developed in there, but the main reason
was to try to maintain a four minute response time to any emer-
gency in the City of Fort Collins.
Gilfillan:
Moved to approve the Fox Meadows Business Park PUD First Phase
Preliminary.
Purvis:
Second.
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
15. #13-82 Oak Ridge Master Plan (East Site)
Request for approval of a 285-ac master plan with 93-ac
industrial, 72-ac business services, 85-ac residential and
35-ac open space, located south of Harmony Road and east of
Lemay, zoned b-p, Planned Business, i-p, Planned Industrial,
and r-p, Planned Residential.
Applicant: Everitt Development, Inc., c/o Robb & Brenner,
Inc., Savings Building, Suite 1080, Fort Collins, CO 80521.
Frank: Gave a staff report recommending.
Bob Everitt: Applicant. Stated that with the master plan they could plan
the area with some coordination, and that they could would work
with the City on the utility planning, and provide a total
community in this area of town.
Bill Brenner: Land Planner for the project. Would be available to answer
questions. Discussed Phase 1 and the high density area
planned, answered questions concerning the height of the
buildings, and the buffer zone planned for the area. Also
discussed the railroad useage and access.
P. & Z 3/22/82
Page 14
• •
Barry Truesdell:
Representative of the Union Pacific Railroad. Requested that
they would like to review the legal description for the
property on the southeast 1/4 section to make sure that it
coincided with theirs. Stated that it appeared in the plan
that there was either a new road crossing and/or a bike trail
proposed and they would have a definite interest in that. They
felt it should meet railroad specifications from the standpoint
of public safety.
Stated also that the triangular section of land should be
secured against public use and the access to it should be
maintained by the the owner. Noted that they would like to be
notified if the drainage structures were to change.
John Lumas:
Area resident. Expressed concern about the unpaved streets and
the fact that there were no schools in the area, and the added
traffic in the area.
Dick Rule:
Area resident. Pointed out that he is not part of the master
plan and stated that he had no problem with it. Stated he
chose to stay out of the master plan until the final location
of Lemay is determined.
Brenner:
Explained that there is a school planned in the area. Agreed
that Lemay Avenue is a busy street and will always be, as
planned under the Master Street Plan. Stated that the intent of
the master plan is to anticipate the future needs of the area.
Georg:
Moved to approve the Oak Ridge PUD Master Plan (East Site).
Stoner:
Stoner: Second.
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
16. #13-82A Oak Ridge Business Park PUD First Phase - Preliminary
Request for preliminary approval of a 55,000 sf office building
on 5.33-ac, located south of Harmony Road and east of Lemay,
zoned i-p, Planned Industrial.
Applicant: Everitt Development, Inc., c/o Robb & Brenner,
Inc., Savings Building, Suite 1080, Fort Collins, CO 80521
Frank: Gave a staff report recommending approval.
Brenner: Applicant. Would be available to answer questions.
John Lumas: Stated that the neighborhood was concerned about the growth
being spread out of the City rather than filled in, and that
the City had a hard enough time trying to maintain City
services ---streets, utilities, Transfort, etc. to existing
areas.
PageP Z 3/22/82 • •
e 15
Stoner: Moved to approve Oak Ridge Business Park PUD First Phase -
Preliminary.
Crews: Second.
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
17. N9-82 Southridge Greens PUD Master Plan
Request for master plan approval of a 218.8-ac PUD with 126-ac
golf course, 19.6-ac commercial, 1,110 multi -family and 60
single-family units, located east of proposed Lemay Avenue
3/4-mile south of Harmony Road, zoned b-p, Planned Business,
and r-1-p, Planned Low Density Residential.
Applicant. BuCain Corporation, c/o Randall Larsen & Assoc-
iates, 125 So. Howes, Fort Collins, CO 80521.
Chianese:
Gave a staff report recommending approval subject to approval
of the amendment to the Master Street Plan.
Bernie Cain:
Applicant. Explained the concept of the project. Explained
that the golf course would be a public daily fee golf course
---privately owned and managed but open to the public.
Frank Hummel:
Golf course architect. Explained that the quality of the golf
course and the quality of the surrounding homes would be very
high. Explained that drainage had been accommodated out of the
subdivision, down through the golf course, and the water would
be retained in the lakes and they had facilities to transfer
the water in the north lake down to the south lake.
Dow:
Questioned if there would be any distinction between the public
at large and the individual propertyowners in the subdivision
as far as access, green fees, etc., or would everyone be on
equal footing.
Cain:
Stated that with respect to daily fee playing, the residents in
the area would have no preferential treatment.
Thomas Luttenegger:
Questioned the road changes. Stated that he represented the
owner of the land just north of the section line, the Archdio-
ese of Denver. Stated that it was their understanding when
they purchased the land, that there would be a road between
where the proposed shopping and the church property would be.
Stated that it was important from their standpoint because of
the access.
Chianese:
Clarified the street changes and explained that it would be a
shared access into the church property.
Barry Truesdell:
Representative of the Union Pacific Railroad. Stated that the
description on this property was incorrect. Stated that it did
not reflect a small triangular parcel in the extreme southeast
V & L i/LL/2tL
Page 16
•
corner of the southwest 1/4 section. Stated that they wanted
to make sure the developer gets together with the railroad
company when it comes time to make a full design on this.
Purvis:
Moved to approve the Southridge Greens PUD Master Plan subject
to the condition that the amendment to the Master Street Plan
be approved by the City Council.
Stoner:
Second.
Vote:
Motion carried 7-0.
18. #9-82A
Southridge Greens PUD First Phase - Preliminary
Request for preliminary approval of a golf course, clubhouse,
and maintenance building on 130.6-ac located on proposed South
Lemay Avenue, 3/4-mile south of Harmony Road, zoned b-p,
Planned Business, and r-1-p, Planned Low Density Residential.
Applicant: BuCain Corporation, c/o Randall Larsen & Associates
125 S. Howes, Fort Collins, CO 80521
Chianese:
Gave a staff report recommending approval subject the the
condition that the amendment to the Master Street Plan be
approved by the City Council.
Bernie Cain:
Applicant: Would be available to answer questions.
Ross:
Requested clarification that the use of the golf course was not
deemed heavy enough to necessitate the development of Lemay all
the way out to Horsetooth.
Chianese:
Stated that that dealt specifically with the City Ordinance
that requires offsite street improvements. Stated that, at one
point, there had been discussion of varying that requirement,
however, that had not been done, it
and is not requested.
Stated that the applicant will still be required to meet the
36' required in the ordinance at the time that the golf course
is opened.
Dick Rule:
Questioned on the development of Lemay, would he be right to
assume that in order to put in 36', the entire alignment of
Lemay from Harmony down to the golf course would have to be
determined.
Waido:
Responded that that was right.
Dow:
Moved to approve the Southridge Greens PUD First Phase -
Preliminary, subject to the condition that the amendment to the
Master Street Plan be approved by the City Council.
Purvis:
Second.
P & Z 3/22/82 . •
Page 17
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
24. #83-81 Miller Land Use Plan Amendment - County Referral
Request to amend Larimer County's Land Use Plan for property
located west of Overland Trail, sout oFi�ospect Street.
Applicant: Alvin Miller, 4017 Spruce Drivae, Fort Collins, CO
80526
Waido: Gave a staff report recommending denial.
Note: The applicant was not present.
Stoner: Moved to table the Miller Land Use Plan Amendment until 4/26/82
Georg: Second.
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
25. #179-79A Taft Hill -Vine Drive -Laporte Avenue Second Rezoning - County
Referral
Request to rezone property containing approximately 41-ac to
amend conditions placed on the property under existing Larimer
County zoning, located between Laporte Avenue and Vine Drive
west of Taft Hill Road.
Applicant: Jerry Nix, Mountain States Properties, 2105 South
Shields, Fort Collins, CO 80521.
Note: Ed Stoner had a conflict of interest and would not be voting.
Ingrid Simpson, the alternate member, would be taking part in
the discussion or vote.
Chianese: Gave a staff report recommending approval of the applicant's
request to remove the February, 1980, condition #3 for
annexation to the City from the rezoning conditions. Stated
that this action is recommended with the knowledge that:
1. The property is still conditioned for development as a PUD;
2. Development of the property is conditioned to meeting the
Urban Growth Area development criteria; and
3. As a condition of receiving out -of -City water and sewer
service from the City, the propertyowners will have to agree to
annexation.
Georg: Moved to recommend to the County approval of the request to
remove condition #3 on the Taft Hill -Vine Drive -Laporte Avenue
Second Rezoning.
Purvis: Second.
Vote: Motion carried 7-0.
P' &
Z 3/22/82
•
•
Page
18
26.
#22-82
Good -All Electric, Inc. Rezoning
- County Referral
Request to rezone Lot 5, Block 2 Crossroads East Business
Center, approximately 2.57-ac, from existing C-Commercial
County zoning to I -Industrial County zoning. The site is
located just southwest of Colorado Highway 14 and Interstate 25
interchange.
Applicant: Van Schaack Corporation, 1776 South Jackson Street
Suite 905, Denver, CO 80210
Albertson -Clark: Gave a staff report recommending approval of the Goodall
Electric, Inc. conditional rezoning request limited by County
Zoning Section XIX paragraphs 19.1 (6), 19.1 (11) and 19.1
(12). The staff also recommends the County re-evaluate its
Land Use Plan for appropriate uses in this area. Staff also
supports the rezoning because it is consistent with the City's
new policy on promoting economic growth and development.
Ross: Moved to approve the Good -All Electric, Inc. Rezoning in accor-
dance with the staff recommendations.
Georg: Second.
Vote
Motion carried 7-0.
Meeting adjourned 12:15 a.m.
Note: This is a summary of the minutes for the Planning and Zoning
Board meeting. Tapes of the meeting are available to the
public. Upon request copies of the tapes can be made.
P. & Z 3/22/82 . •
Page 19
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
WORK SESSION
Date: 3/ 19/ 82
Time: 12:00 Noon
Place: CIC Room - New City Hall
Agenda: Work Session for regular P & Z meeting of March 22, 1982
Board Present: Gary Ross, Dennis Georg, Ed Stoner, Tim Dow, Dave Gilfillan,
Barbara Purvis, Don Crews
Board Absent: Ingrid Simpson
EXHIBIT AA c,.
U rxee S 16Ne IJ W U LO f., j<2 To
Keep -TNe- iv 1 AC-eeS SUoeowj0iN(�,
E>AUDeQ ScNOOC. SA Ue O (-C)e S iN6Ce FAM I Ly
Home S .
N �} me AD 0)lil
c� 6ul.
�" 714 .
z/J-)-
LA
i�A}rcij*�::C_LI��aa� ��- e-t� -sJ3
:Z,I/-Lil7/17
JtQp� Qvt� Qk -
q��/���
�uK.
r
1 - �
�f--.'.c�s.% ✓�G-tom.,-� :-L�tc. ��a�u o�"W.v�//�c��/-G 4L� ! - d'� 3..�,
4-3 74
OG rG�� 1� `� �� Ck� �SO , ✓(� 01� �I i Ott
9 %
��-e-or�.�sc�rn,a•�'L� o�� 0� � � -4`r3 i233z
EXHIBIT A
To:
Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Ft. Collins
We the undersigned oppose the expansion of a non -conforming
use in case $ 11-82. We do not want to have the building known as
Fort Collins Housing Authority located at 1715 W. Mountain to be
expanded by an addition.
We feel this would be a detriment to the park, golf course and
the residential area.
Name
Address
/ ` L ct<
ter' a ! � (r-r�-� i / �''y � � (� — /'r7 6 ,-�
�. ZL 4� t G 7
I