HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning And Zoning Board - Minutes - 05/05/19641`"�'1ViAbSDUM
To: City Punning & Zoning Board may 5, 196l�
From: The Planning Director
Subject: Recommendations on Agenda Topics - May Meeting
Item ? This appears to be a logical use if dedication of "T" turnarounds on
-112:f ,y and Columbine and of Bluebell across the east end of subject
Property takes place.
Access from Unrue directions by dedicated streets should prove LdeGante
for vehicles.
lead-erds with turnarounds 1,700U< eliminate through traffic on DalsY :-,-d
Columbine.
P1` iJel..l is a short $ti+eFt. prol�abl'i n7t encanzaf7.ne t .rUl' h p>•
speeding. Z+' speed became a roblem in the future p P- , reve�.Ltive ;;oti-,
struetion might disco-,iraEo it.
The single family homes in thi.a area are becoming an island, due to
fraternities and sorovilde;- located east and north, C.S.U. orop:,rtr
to the west, multiple family housing, recreation and Campus ?!�.s
business to the south.
Item ) Whitaker - Cook Rezoning
i#20-6! Adjacent Zoning - North, east arad South single family residential.
West - County agricultural
Southwest corner Elizabeth & Taft Full Commercial "D"
Southeast - Residence "B" (two family)
No particular desirable relationship of site to areas of employment,
Shopping Districts or existing multiple family zones.
. Long dimension east & west would spread influence of "C" zone over much
of adjoining lands developed or zoned as single family.
Other land zoned "B" for two family dwellings in the neighborhood hag
not been developed as such.
All permitted uses, as provided by "C" zoning must be considered at time
rezoning is requested.
The City Zoning Map has erroneously shown this parcel as fPC". A "no
money down" contract exists.
Item 4 The area in question is surrounded by "A" Residential zoning, with tie
#21-6u exception of Original Wxtin Subdivision which is an island zoned
"B" but not so developed.
Use of built up land adjoining this is single-family.
The property is well suited for single-family development and for it to
remain "A" will not deprive owners of use.
Item 5 The annexation of the property seems logical.
`2?-62 Three parcels in the vicinity are zoned. "B", Residential and partly de-
veloped as such. The closest business zoning is at the intersection
of Prospect and 164ay, izith entirely different circurstan(aes in
icon.
To have "D", Commercial zonir,. in this location does not zppea) cob -oo3
zoning practice or in keepi.ng with good planning pri.ncipic-s.
The intended use for the land is shown as a mobile home park, but °'D:t, s;,.r.
mercial zoning permits tnaRf other uses in addition to this. Jtaer
u0cs could have an adverse. affect upon the entire alcinit, .
?Son -conforming use on the front part of the property is an, exarpe tc;
show adverse affects upon -nrroundiz:g residential areas.
�.. •
• Item 6 I would not recommend the rezoning as requested.
,#23-64 Existing uses to the west and south of this one-half block are residential.
Development of the area in eucstion as Commercial would probably be
piece -meal, with substential damage to nearby residences and prop-
erty values for years to come.
The zoning of other nearby residential properties as C�n:rncrcitl his
riot resulted in new business buildings.
The existing Commercially zcnec land should be used ac;orc'inglf b•Fere
extending the zone.
E;ctension of the downtovn corrmcss-^cta]. rea should take )lace b=:fo:_.
peninsu'_as are extended frig, the Riverside Avenue Cox.tercia:
Item 11 Campus Gardens & F. M. idarbsstc�i
#9-6P, Zoning on adjacent land: north of Stuart Residence
To the east, south and west, residence A, single-?amily.
Northwest corner of 'vibedbee and, Stuart is Residence A also.
At this time the property is somewhat isolated from other ringle
fani7y residences. A park adjoins on the west and the drive-in
theatre is a ,ion -conforming use to the east.
Developed residential area to the south is on top of a hill and therefor
separated by elevation.
Several intense residential uses would be permissable if "B" zoning is
granted, namely: "Fraternity and Sorority house. Boarding ,and,
rooming house. Private club, fraternity and lodge".
The property is well suited to single family residential development,
if lots along the east edge were to back up to the drive -in -theatre.
• It appears that an extremely large percentage of the City is zoned
Residence B. Until the existing "B" zones are developed with more
"B" uses, the desirability of zoning substantial areas for thesne
uses might be doubtful.
0
i•'IKETES OFS L"; ING
• FORT COLLINS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
Call :'.o Order: Cha'3 rvzn Robert Oc'_✓do3tr e vallad the nect'. S to order t k 14
.., A'=ino t. `I of the April 9 A 2 i3 Meetings . '_. a � .. � t;.SCt': .t .rG': -_ice z1J �U�_, � � ' ;..
'110013 ,,_ :,_ ent.:
I`agerfleisca ; ''uy Po.n%ner, James i ee sc, Er. . Robb. ,
and RR.bart Boni, City monager.
A F.ar itc.-ch Jr., -usi Cant City Attoraey, Gaie Allan, 11cosin..
Director and ap_,?a o, l m tely sixty-Wo in..: rec cd °3'+�ti is>.D -
' . �.tt � #E��...!-?da
f -. , ,. ..
I�.s.'iuxL.u7d spoke 3_,.,.q, �.-.ap?.ioat�.�,n, 3'L z.�..t �_: had cvU.. _
nano of the nearly vide te and explain th; reTioud Ina, ,.
devslepryen;-. 'rheiv' c j"-s V gas had Leon iaatwy o, the KAKW -�
traffic created by adding Uwing units. The cE viced plea al i _. _n
aces through traffic `,n interior streets, an' no objicticr ,
it arere stated. The CiAculption of traffic, 331sting Wan It,
and the preliminary pan of Residential; .,:ein= and lrlyntv ...
Areas in the vicinity of subject proper'Ir e:esa d scuose i;';:.
Planning Director.
In answer to a gvestinn, Mr. Munford said develop,aent
probably be over a period of about two years.
•
!Action: Virgil M=4ers leisch moved to apl ,. awe the reque. "+ t"o
i"C" zoning subject to dedication of necessary viyt
of-was and .:asemonts. SecCifin by jares XneoE �I
carried by unanimous vote.
.en 3 #20M&�t
Hr. CYzestax Esnnett spoke �e Attarnay for the rppliccant , -
reference to mox,y acpacts of Planning an! Wring in Ana zT.
part of Fort Gollio s. Among other thing- .'ne contended
erty uns not, suited for single family W1lirZn becanse of by,7Vo.
Re iden:.s in t" e nisi a+,y; represented bg F. A. Lungren _.
se .ted a petition :w2e change to "U" a:,--
persons.
Motion: Dr. Lee movei, with a second by VirL11 Mager le;Wa ,
to recosxend denial of the request ;agars done . U::
this year. Two reasons states; ';sere,
a) The need to F. azon2 Svc track hno not h,c..::i:'.
bj Asoident of the area oppose 1% .
The motion carried by un:+.ni.noras vote:.
;tz±sa to 01-64
The tra=:t involved ;aW surrounding cona.' a_..n. move b_,.c: :j
d7 csuss3d, w'itt. naps used for' 6 = L ,
•
px .sen ed I recti s ` aizd sated is .a_�..e a., ,« balls:
units if rezoning takno place.
• Motion: Mr. Magerfleisch moved to recommend approval of ''ciae
rezoning. It was seconded by Roy Portnar and carried
with a unanimous vote.
102 5 # t " 22- The property ra<s lrcat.2d o;a ram and the �pp.�.'�-ca2 „ah�o ins,. ',ar
discuss the appl.catic.n.
Mr. Holsinger stated kis intention to build .. Wile ':
if rezoning takes place.
Several residents of nearby properties spoke gin. appeGiW on A:
the request for "D', r:ommerc_al zoning, eu: rot iact-.;;:
to annexation of We ",rant.
...
FA p:>titi..v11 with 50 7i:S?.S filed in GY",..}F",. .t1C.:• to. .
zoning.
Motion: Virgil Magerfleisch moved to recc=„mead. denial c_. 'ohQ
request. Seconded by Mr. Keese and. -parried by
im,-ovs vote. I4r. Holsinger stated he wcuId prw"_a,j::;:,
drop the vnn:;xation.
Hem 6 123-64 Mr. Cecil Summers prrec>er-ted the rezoning request, st atir t&;
desire to build a. „iall auto repair shop on Clive Strec i
brought about the rezoning petition.
• Mr. March was asked to read the uses perr:itted. in "E", Fs..3:i.raenv,
which he did. Owners of property :in the KnEdi ate vLc j2:;. t o '
subject lead spoke at length in opposition tv W zonin _ v'
stated many uses woul? be allowed by 011 whi.c':a vould
affect the residential character of the neighoorhood. an? .i
would much prefer apaArznts, duplexes or other uses peimitt&
by existing zoning. Several said the r_eigabcfh- cd is
quiet and they want to preserve it thus.
Mr. Al Johnson .filed a petition signed t:, 2.; ca,r.:era of
property and inelicat9d their places of re;idcrse.
Motion: Mr. Fortner moped to recommend ha zeq-.est not b -
granted. The motion was seconded by Virgil age*°-
fleisch and Carried.
item 7 #224-64 Mr. Fred Each; En_ ine.r, discussed this A%1, tic
Planning Board and mentioned special pa o aamr✓avch as
status of Streets leading Trow Taft 2111 ini.c"�saa __
The Planning Director road the following iters Laxos:. t
for the Board to requ
a; Provide open ends on oul-K-cace .
b; Rearrangca the north and of he E'alsu9_7io roan.
cy The developer atterpt to rcnalvc prob1cm of .. .,
• two access streets being de cai -- .
d; Completion of usual agreemorls i ga ' ing S ,t
of streets & constrr,c'tion of utfilLti-es.
0
•
40
Discussion centored a ovrd the 0proving ant .°. maintc'_4anen
the two streets h'aV n,.'.:; re3 do-..3ts abutting who ruride in th-e
Ed. Boos stated the f i should not be s,1
y'espo.._,..7..b01_ity dY a i. �.if�6ruvcaltf>a4
]ust rp r salt:' t n�.'i::S'+d YWHo
l jri._ . ., .:.,. il*»Mr. :2?a.l ..rt
03 -'q. .1 U..:. vTo3ent b:i2 behalf.= f.c c4
Several questions r ,a ding street connections to Sp ,:_
and Indian Hills were. wised— It wasc^v't a `tc,j tie ,} opf
connection to tie enst line 2 the r ^c;;e,lr -,
Sat1sly !-hZ . nee fo" ca'�ce.$t7 fro.P.i Lbe P s ��':L 7laV, 'L a
approved s.rith the fal;.s. ing conditions.
:a)Dedicated ur.ce>s across the ra:t, e_ ',o Sr,•,
b) ThL, aZr=emont on street a.il--:ia merit":. t i.,
G-c.1'13C t1. fJ:i o1 utilities.
1
G') Utility e-.cC:t7:ents labeled aW Y a+ Fb..r Noun,
Cd') An eas i enG for Spring Week, W.'.a._ a 4li a, Tat,
of the F::l.'-Y rneineer.
.. um n #25"6w Order of Agenda rq , v se,::''.. because of wit:i zea. n ?.__ti.0 [ g to disonsc- _
em 11 #9-6h In the absence of asiyo-Gopeak fmvo.: '%:' a11iC 2 ._.`:t i
South � 'CJ..'7.4_' College p cke in oppositicn o tic Z ; n .
'f'G'.?,.t S:L�4.�i City shoal! We purchased the p t r ,.- y for ,�u
when it van a. mil,''b+ . !hey were told of Thc v (-n
the land,, iouich d:'.? lv :jo0 purchase of it ac ;xp.
Citizens who spoke in cppositiec m n iorw V r . e '-Z
cc'casivns th, bad altanC
cd-he'nriug ?70:
J .. ..
aevoulb-
ject property :.t:d Wycoxatonr3s
have not chenEnd
to js2 s -
neiU-1borhoo L'3 aXxp op-,
pu.:e :.,:',2J. the propcoly
A qj
action'
developed with the on%
as it is.
W tioiq: James KTOD ,...
red t , recommend d
by n v0n o,"Ave
cc one.
The 'slat of Martin
joct, to the vo-u ll e;in,rocnts . ; 3At ,
u ilitiaS �- ,
d!L..:_z,:, 4'.13 s. .`'�{:Ccaid F.1—..ng ::s
-G^'u to the conditions.,
-^ e
..a.t l _'.'.{.?1 of 60, fee,,-
nT
foci `T I r. '_?: 'Gv,:� ii the planni-e
e t 1. e a :.0 width.
n
e) tarrre+ra-zr� c1:..-cie-- c.c at I�!e south e;::d.
d) Signi-ng c_' w- �l _Ka' e> nr_ s _eiative to
of e_lA c-Dri" .,.';"Yk`'.t.7.o of utilities.
�'._�, lz � r�,3'G�: �, Y4 3: �.�"i1e annual Lnis'li'tiL.+e 5'c-.- t�"1_ ,%v4:!,$ Officials Oa May 15d.±
;11C:n :icned, with 't?obert Oc`-e' tt,A.:ey D . Le'e arid'. Dan ill`-7.� 3.: d—iM
atinu a desire to Lt rd.
id r-,ut,rr:eixt: The meeting adjourned -t '_1.0o15 P.M.
RT'T _;a`1'
4 Secrett"