HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning And Zoning Board - Minutes - 04/07/1964n7Kr]r '�r`s day k' s, i
FOYdi C0LLT u<'ki 3 Cv'u <u` a -ONT G W", ,?.T."
Call to order: Ct ixman ioterL• calls6 the
Minutes: Minutes of the meetings held march 7 Ijtxd 10, ifenrz devl&ce
pre$en4adn
Members presents James Keese, Dr. Roban^tt :sae, Virgil Rqv
Laurence Mcliillana Attire Hsjor and Robert Boos, Cit),
Others present: Arthur March, Jr., Assistant City AttornI Cane k,..
Director and appro.-d aetely forty-five iwe crested
Request for The Secretary explained that i9r: glary 6°iij natth, Attor p ?o,
continueing #7 Hautas had requested a contiasasnce of Ujc.c� hearing; to
stating it was. not possible for Nautas os, him to be
Mr. Hill Allen, Attorney for opponents to the rozoning
their desire to hold the hearing as scheiuled and make
Mr. Wilmarth was present in the room and in answer to a gaa� viu4l
from Chairman Qeheltree, stated he scanted his presence
The Board decided to hear the matter as ach Baled,
Item 2 A2®64 After a brief disorlp#on of the area and this request w z
Mr. Roger Barnhart spoke in opposition to "C" zoning of •c'xe asO
part and presented. petitions cone fining 219 signatures of
residents. The arguments against "C"s Rcsidciatial toning auarr,
read and souse discussion took place regardins the problem m ea;' :<
age of and through the subject tract. Dr. Lae suggestad port �
the land could be a continuation of Avery Park.,
In answer to a question NX. March stated the annexation IW a"-`
and zoning request are insepaerable, but the Loard con:7d yevos,v
annexation and zoning I other than "C".
Motion: Virgil bkger°Vleisch moved to recto c;sad arnexati oD of
area, with tine entire 15.1 zoned as "A", Fz id€yeti.=,x
After a second by Dr, Lee, the motion c�arriri Lg vas<
Mons vote.
Item 3 64 The rezoning request end its location were ascplained arse? ''s,
Griffith was invited to discuss any details he thought irpor
He did so .and a ww red several questions pertaining •tc se:; x;.F
disposal facilities, dedication of additional riCht of 6y C
Harmony Road and his Nchedule of developmant.
Motions Dr. Lee moved to recommand favorable action_ sulblec
the sc-=age disposal system being in compsli .gaou snit
0 Lerimer County and State of Colo.^ado sUnd&ade, g�
dedication of 50 foot total for the north one -Yial *
the County Rofad(piarmors Road) adjrlvAng on the son
later a scoond by Jim Keese, the motion T,7". crrh°fir
s7nZIU1011e vote.
Item 4 114-64 Kra Bill Baxtrrax: explained their desire to provide as buffer all.,
• °BO, Residential (duplexes) between the probable mult0l.e—
family area of OSU and single family dwellings they are to bu la
south of Elizabeth St s t.
The Secretary mention: d a conversati cn with F ;Ea •s v alwestriy;
of C.S.U. in which mwz-ried student mousing woo stated au lane
most 3.1017 feature uss of the "Bull ''arm".
Motion: Jim Reese mount to recommend "DO Residential :,oninj_
Seconded Y ? ryll ' Sagerf leisch and s wiled o
Item s 115-64 A description of the location and request was _?.given. Ass.
Qnford presented infa;:siatlon which the Secretary read, ahawlt,
the proposed devalopmQV
Mr. Waldo Riffenburgh spoke as Attorney for lose op"
alaz;; tFa�
rezoning;, stating a sindlay request was brow,_ht up About a, _ran
ago, being denied at that time, He stated, other Arguments soninst,
with particular emphaois on discouraging traffic and preseririzj,
the axes for single fnzilies, as expected bf residGnts nau re,
siding there.
Other residents of the area spoke, continuing to expresr b^a.avil
that traffic. conditions would be vmarsened by nultiplo Vallyr
housing on the subject land and that halt been upon
• continued zoning of the area for single farsY;y4 Incurring.
Motion: Mr. MagerFleisch moved to table the request for
study. Roy Partner neconded the motion rhich cos then
carried by unanimous veto.
N44 Ochel5ree stated the purpose in tPbUiv, esx 4o
allow time• to look at the entire aret gad otili Yau
tect existing development,
Itea 6 #16-64 After an explanation of the request was ,given, Mr. Max
outlined plans for use of tle subject lard, stating, it `+2;,y to
be used for additional retail shopping Area, that
in Campus West. 1n answer to a gcnstion he: eta.t, d righ -ra,ir
was to be given for both CHI Park Avenue A&, B`Cs t
Lotion: Yr. Boos moved, seconded by Hr. Fortner, to ga. c; _:'aVoi ry:'?.c,
. rWorm andaation on annexation of a9ae area, and 1711 con; 4:a:
zoning of the same, subject to conditions staini i. a o
memo from the P1axm ing Director. Motion Cara _<I::."y 71Y..
arlmous vote
='teaa 7 #17-,64 Before this Sea V00 csa3asussed the ChalzR.an ins ru Wd Vn rco ,u _-
to look in the building fen Ex. Wilmarth -and ':z Nut 1, z ss"
whom were present VarKer in the meeting. Th oy sera not zi l
able and the heariD.g Egan with Mr. S111 llle� ps nn yn?>,,
opponents. He gave a history of vezoning actioUico r001vo to
this property and x a. aronted yeti ions sontrinim *arc won _, 7!,
signatures of residents in the vicinity eino opposed lime ehtvi;e
-to "B1°,
Business District. 1P-wons presented are suT-in .rived as
• follo" s
a)
No recent chanLes to Juatify business on this tract
have taken place.
b)
On the contmy County zoning of mu.;s :adjaceurit 1.,acd
is R, Roaidential (single family) and rnprexa.tiaru to
the Ci"Zr of 1 nd in the araa is done under 'WI, i slsi-•
dential District (single fanilv).
a)
The nearby nroa Is beeoming moredevelcped lhtnte3
than previously "hen rezoning was considered.
d)
d tract of lama enr--,half mile to the north is tv.znd
for Commercial use and is adequate to serve n< J—? of
the neighborhood.
e)
Nice homes are located on the Noatheast corner or' thc:
Intersection, near the subject properly.
f)
Sire a smaller parael is described bran in prrevious
requests, it is more pronounced "spot zoning".
Motions Dr. Lee moved to recommend denial of the requcat "daecause a
a) The need for rezoning this area to "B", Business ins not
been demonstrated.
b) The land involved is the request is too small an area
and thus constitutes "spot zoning".
o) Other land in the vicinity is now zonad "B", Business,
providing adequate area to serve the needs.
d) Extensive opposition and petitions sighed by people
• within the immediate vicinity have been presents . Ti2eir
objections appear to be valid. Notion secondel k Firgi-1
Magerfleisch and carried by unanimous vote.
Item 8 #18-6h The land Involved in the request, adjacent zaidng and ..and use
In the vicinity were explained. Mfrs. Stoner explained one prop -
arty, at Smith and Olive was under purchase contract. Nr.
Summers the buyer explained he wished to construct aE auto-•
mobile repair garage on the rear of this corner lot, and Vie
house would remain. Sithur March stated the garage use mold
not be plated in the "D", Commercial zone, as requested, lmt arm
a permitted use in "B", Commercial. District, :such as exist: cast
of the alley in Block 133.
Mrs. Stoner asked if the Board would recommend "Ell, otmnea-,i i,
but received no coKsdttmant. It was suggested the pet.itiu<. Sze
withdrawn and this she did.
Items 9 #19-64 The location and rezoning application were explained and Mr.
gahrenbruch was asked to elaborate on his pro csal. Ho st: ,ted a
large rent -nursing hose was intended and shawad a picts:�: or
similar development,. After extensi-re discussion, imst, of -uhich
revolved around more opportunity for City partloipaldwn tints Lvuli _
ante in nearby areas vacre zoning, annexation and
involved, action was taken as follows:
• Motion: Mr. Boos moved, seconded tp 14r. 25OU.'l.lan, to roco,=rnci.
against the rezoning, since new & a.o ndad plan s lu,re
not been prepared and existing preliar&va yy game 1.9'4-e
been relied upon by maw. The motio:,s cr rri .l by , x-
moos vote., P<.'ora discussion followed, The os'
a letter written to the Larimer County Commissioners
and Planning Comddesion is quoted below.
a) For properties such as this, which are likely to be
annexed to the City in the near future, it aeons logi-
cal that annexation proceedings, subdivision plate and
zoning should be considered together. Utilities are
not immediately available to the Fahrere ruck panel and
It is dependant upon the Tiley property for annexation,
as it does not abutt the present City JAmits.
b) Property owners in -the vicinity and City 0fficir3l.s have
believed the intended use was one fap$l3 dwellirgs be-
cause a preliminary plat, in exietanae for a fow years,
has indicate,, typical residential layout for the subject
3And
e) The proposed zoning does not provide aarye buffer or step
down zoning since it is in affect an islami within a lcs;
density residential area ("FA", Farming District is basif:m
ally low -density residential).
d) Subject property as described, does not have access to
a dedicated road, street or frontage road at this time.
Item 10 The Secretary presented the problem of duplicated street names
and sirtdlar pronunciations found in Fort Collins and vicinity.
After some discussion about specific names and conditions action
• was taken.
Motions Mr. Boos moved to have the Planning Director prepare a
list of recommendations to correct known duplications
and unofficial names of streets. Motion seconded by
Dr. Lee and carried.
Park Plans Mr. Boos reported that plans for development of several City
Parks are being prepared as a guide for landscaping, construction
of facilities and installation of equipment.
The Secretary shoved such a plan of Avery Park and e:,gplainad
the layout and objectives in it.
Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 10s30 .M.
ATTEST:
�reta�