Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning And Zoning Board - Minutes - 02/04/1964r•r. •6 • MuZTXNG a•C`T COLLINS .i.,01 ZCia.L.M. 03AWD g.¢._.! to order: At 3:35 P. & ''•; turfs present: P hainz-v.TA tI��JG:'L. .� 1';,x ..,, Co.ober°t Lea Qy 1 el 'n: ce, Virgil NagerfI0000, Jns._L , _.._ ar: Cis C bobart Baca, FP[:.., )E.ve a.bJrie at: i.,Vor H&- 7e Wsrs present: Flsnning Consul °+.w, Trafton Dowd, Planning Director Gene Allah' and g pp w'_3mate1, I4'! in' texas4 :1 ea'9Ut3s. t"agenda Item 1. Minutes of the a wary `E� j 15,64 meeting :acre c da �;:l approved as prig' w& and presented. Item 2. Sir. 1111 Tiley s:.osented the petition and :articipaa;m_ in the discusses n. The need for a servIes road alon,, College Avenue vau discussed at length. Motion: Dr. Low moved to recommend approval of the 40 anneystion, subject to arra,-nmementa for �'.e dlcaticn of the service road. Se ended any r. d ersc aped carried by unanimcua :.rote. item 3. A short discueploa follo3ed prc3entation of this subject. Hr. E lcr spole for the :applicnAts and mentioned screen:! conditions of the land sahioh We :it desirable fox, 'she proposed +is';es. Motion: Jamse Toone moved to r;com:end re oning of the prcr crty as requested. Seconded by ft. Lee ant carried by un=Q=5 vote, item W This proposal age presented by Attorney Was Fischan representing Mr, ;Rauch. The Board decided the .a seating and replK whouid be acted upon separately. Attorney Arthur H reh, Jr. stated _the aa+nbi.n; shnuAd be accomplisher=, I tvansfer of deed from the City Q the proponent potion: ':ioy %stner mv7od to aaprove the reintirC $uti ce l to fi check f06 c.u{':it i a "ioc^ red ' tine utii ..`:.y C'ei a3.rt?ten '>,. Sccorckl 1J„"' 6''1 Tr Recsc tad carried 17 .. un<,6?I mOlas 700. i otiors Et— i,ec cave to acacp; the re..: l..t lb -.: ,. to the usual subWai.4., + n agronnenis e. if signed, 0ann'a d by annas vocse 4nd. ca +'ycd AOndL Itch, j, Mr. Frank Boxoerger presented this item _ :.; �e<< L;Ia location of the �:.ri various do+ai?< of the plat, .d33t3.6ul;r_' *+ fhe'a -ll for a r rh 'n t?a� Clr_.tion: f .:pled :' . e to mak" t. 1'r, 4i''.YAt ^cllits ... •itil,:a:l;i.., 7 ol'u.';.'rSaic":� `JL 'S1".,�,. C ..'�,r Itc'm 6� Tlhe >nnaza " l�iae',^tOt° ".re�?.'.ted tine plat :'*ECG that ('ue to an orosen ;.•brc st im..c°.s the �:r..t°; £. i)ax } r; • :S;r; had no ii luo'.'ed E,t 1"ric ':.,i u a "Tai &',1: EA1 . Hotxon: it's. Pu. 'e`.aor -_ ve, %tit�3�1G.;:i'07e 'Uic plat to i :r.i t lslCfi. stl:''J.,y .' C14V.['Lvo flea Dn. 1 n ° usE_rxr ,E:7zaaly n-pprcfec`.. Item, 7. Mr. Bartran presented 'As plat, eXplainin it c,!" s, continuation of their pm.vious subdivisions and is garaccl upon 'their over -rill mgLer plan of dcvelo y,a nt, Motion. Dr. Lee moved for approval subject to _,� one k of details by the City. Seconded Inj Jamers goose snd approvad by unanir:ous vote. Mote: Item 3 and 9 reversed in order at the meeting. .1tem 9. Attornc=y l'i Gene .seher explainedcA the Intion Of this am aexation and cirvmjistaniaeo requiring the boua:daries to be as shown. Motion; Virgil Magertleisch moved to spprovo subject to letters of consent to C zoning to.'. ig pre vented fros adjacent landowners. Seconded by Mai^. Boos and parried by unsmt-noun "y a 1-WE 3. The Planning Director presented ra written report, section details, maps ^howLsig alternative d<ai. ns and recorr4andations for lgproovemants. Several vzt'.:,ena spoke on various aepec ;s cX the ixopo nl, ge:c;,s Ions and coLiLents were n ^ Bred about '.ccation of m, ,..- .ian breaks,,, experience rf rather cozrz , itLs, a.diraW-- geu oP side lightLig versus canter ligh'.Ing, u-turi4q, 'trallta crntrol, lights and zaffenta of Co.loge livrr:u -.e°.1 on date of construction of a rev by-p"s, (,'hAJ.rc; n 04-Leltrea set a meetir, for .ate' , Febrl iz;r 15t!", iT"'.ath o7-mars Pnd j➢�,,F1y::. JF=?s' a.k%?D."j. �.3 @eP.'W ai, $'.:_. says i.r^�.'•,.'r.' Rem 10. rc 'arlef review of eh-� proposed z,.;endm,=;nts a,:r the l €t as prupc;.aod in Janu a)r tieing •e= • 2oa 2,mevdsrcrts 0 0 OAAGRO: ,,Q two wV�j „< o , J,.:,. WvAn .os' .fiIAQ _., , "`. .. ,�..� slr.Hin.1.�Lvt. 6/: u « e. o Y,, , .. J U .. ...� ... Lot, to .r va to 221 ,i ... _ v. -f l 4a. ..,. u .v _ s2 . � d � F.'�.. o -�1 ., .. Sid i •Y C� _. ... 61$'ys ae-u , a._ - Win Awl. .1 nm.. , �gs" 'Say, :3 ?.s,'!.. ?Sig`2r to onjontal. 51VOTS was r.,."'.t.s+ Cr fie nat Agenda Item 4. :5:ackgro; n s�Yv b, Esc the roqu x'; an eids' iikg Tc,�int Jr,tithe vicinity as S ",Yr.%..1exton g.'>e'e.sent & '! Tip mF �1c [ F Of - ting lead is not rVailsols in other £alas of V" W :il'.^-. pl xe}„„S.j�and tia, InnTv'lA1.3c .: f.; :,�•, ar v C'�.diP�'.::.'i "S cam., jo.[ningj $pxfip; Path. 1�a.bi'Y.ns�on related Jo a n cook vlaco., STJ. a ccn _'>< &w;7 that t qc ply was cut in G Interests of tic Ci.t3, ..Le,zic c2 c."Lnvicn or aer ..- joining prwpar_."e inclli`; :Irg Spring Park. It ai'_,s POA&H that use of r joa as: iig I ;;, to 'Lae caste r'aas io cKnZn Gcon, to jstify the cast of F:7A.ng. R' to ing a qucz t&tl 3.n of +J7 5 h Sy i; e o p;'«^,^,£ n3t in sppcoltion ,,. the requeK, about ton (1.v.ers stool. 'U'r. be lief that he uts being discriminated against. Nay i _?;fin Oc aeltTee thca called 2cz- a iAG"'w: QU. Motion: Mr. Rosa mHe a, sZKOn Sich was Seco cad by Tn. ins; that the FlonnIng Bo ra recomnend against the and leave No zoning; "A", 1 eside_+eice Di.strlett aizv,�e land is well suited Or nice is IS. All ?wav;sxW s a in favor of the rs oti on. Item Following an explanation of the revised plot and brief disnusoi;,nt the Board acted on the proposal. Motion: Pot pormer moved to apparaua the revised final p1, t3 • because it improves on the origi:ail plat and ppov? d s access to adjoining land. NcUon use seconded Q he. Lee and approved by' unanimous vote. Item 6. This van mithdraun with agreement of the Engineer preparia; &0 plat. Item 7. Mr. William Allen, AttQruear, spoke in behalf of the citi es> as :e_°ca North College xho apposed a median And center lighting for tho street. us presented a map acd petitions iris;ijating opposition by about 62% of property owners affected. A discussion on nussrous specific points took place includin.iv reasons for considering surface construction in addition to lightingt wishes and jurisdiction of the Colorado HiQuAy De- partment in the nattor and problems in lecating aw a side 13. E a,ing systcn. Motion: Virgil Pfhgcar leinch unved to recommend a,apro�sra.i. of ' c plan loca'`u;:D, street lights along the nd ;aw of I ort1' College., subject, to Epprov>€^`a by the Hillway D;_gip:t giant. If too Bapa i C at O'Jec.ts to side tip<. to to be r; ;r6lod by Vae Board. Hotion was o6o'an by Q. Loc oN tarried by vnaniraws vote. Items 3 & %. Discussion was " .0 € TO(& 4. v =.;:i1 � FL' er i m, 4.a.T[ie iin ' "5i n . Itvlz 10. Mr. °ill Wyatt, I.^.v."aii.tf?s:."t County Attorney, spoke an a promsol bY the L&x-a.saer :a'v`t,.nty K'?1 issic sor£. He outlined '' e Y?Cicd /NSF.' large a wev to be co synd by .sivi.3.ay t eTs1cpnonE't siannydo n3 the dosirnP: ility rR 0 ,j t'"s: King plaa .^ oT streato and r unv,- °a'r.�''::. a f3'drt1G"bg7ati43s in Q!©1*4 a3 tev...a9y tC°'liE' S`P'd etay a "Un .f©llaw the is ^ AA 491.4 01 b. c' Gi,14✓7 Ocuncil. Fi?S1 Fe.. • ';,' _„e, i..,e c... _�...., lis:eitaf sudh r HC zrbeva/�e!,of tho Pr Omar .`%�iCt Gillian CowtP$'.`.tee 02 ':A CQ'%;CP:.'c8 vnra :in t.t`i t?;' ;:a!'.L3 nal ZsE'.lco:zed €'t tsyQ; 'aa item 3, tip°. Traffon Bean s€ gg st d prcoeaatat ion sad stu 4 �zs Ing existing, Land Use and p'.'ic li-nInsi::i' prR-es 'lLss ful CS5.r : i ,+ i . Business and industrial Arens be posopon,;�" aua a,, „ Harch loth. The Planning Tzard. deaidcd to hold specie.. u.to 8a FEe rr Tuesday of each montw for discussion of Dung ' "gs c , Ur. Bean read and discussed. a Suggested k.TcV2-'6 was favorabl,r received bj tie Board. Item 9. The possibility and desixmbilitg of having 4 Hi _aw_r ,s`!8'RV'LC-I. - o the Railroad between 111E i r€y L?, easy., of cw elc: ,' c�zx3 xi3' j1 a:, rFs� wear LaPorte were presented by Planning Ri rector° Ctaae al b eh,'.., The lengthening of an over-pvcs where Tntc a=stotr rt'�,5 rze FAilroad would be necesaMr, p-rmitting the nee.T re iK-1e to _�xln sander just north of and adjacent to the interchange would be esse aatial to provide a coni-ectti on fee , _a an existing east-eaest County Head, the proposer,:. routes sad #25. • The matter of timlmg a request to the Colorado IUE41way LIsjrY�r'waze,,A was discussed. It was stated that bids would probably bz cg:9.1ed for and a contract let for construction of this part of lea. >zsta: e Highway k"25 in mid-1964. Motion: Rog PorEner wed to work with the Chamber of on the proposal and make a recommendation to C` d ,;> %o:iixwil favoring such a Hi iway. Seconded by Virgil and carried by unanimous vote. Additional Item. Mr P. F. King was present regarding rezoning of a tract on the west side of L©kfay Avenue, and north of EUEabeth 31,rset about 200 feet. This application had been referred by Ia-';-a2 Countaq for recommendation, but had bees tabled because of 'L_='-o:.e3 -"c r. discriptions and terminology.. Notion: 1r. MagerYleisc"a, moved to recommend "C'P a. Cob�s3.rr�iai'. Boning for the north portion (Idng prop may) aikv °,I'Y _• Btssi,ness znniig for tale- e-outfa portio' (south of property). Motion seconded by DrZ u,&e, cwrri unank nus vote. ddeeting adjourned at 11:25 ?J1. xif�� Gad A'F�T �+eC , rl Ll r 0 t _[ }e (II