Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning And Zoning Board - Minutes - 08/22/1994PLANNING i ZONING BOARD • MEETING MINUTES August 22, 1994 Gerry Horak, Council Liaison Ron Phillips, Staff Support Liaison 0 The August 22, 1994, meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Roll call was answered by: Chair Clements, and Members Bell, Carnes, Cottier, Fontane, Strom, and Walker. Staff Members Present: Eckman, Hamdan, Herzig, Olt, Phillips, Shepard, Vosburg and Worden. Mr. Phillips read the agenda review. AGENDA REVIEW Item 1. Minutes of the May 23, June 6 and June 27, July 11 and July 25, 1994, P i Z Meetings. Item 2. Harmony Market PUD, 7th Filing, Golden Corral - Preliminary and Final, #54-87Y. Item 3. Harmony Market PUD, 3rd Filing, Steele•s Expansion Final, #54-87Z. Item 4. Harmony Market PUD, 9th Filing - Final, #54-87Y. Item S. Oakridge PUD, Cornerstore - Preliminary, #13-82BI. Item 6. Upland PUD, Filing One (Upland's Prospect Business Park, Block 2) - Preliminary, #3-84G. Item 7. Bank One PUD - Preliminary and Final, #54-87W Item 8. Hillcrest PUD - Final, #6-93B. Item 9. Falcon Ridge PUD - Final, #2-94G. Pulled for discussion. Item 10. Resolution PZ94-11 Easement Vacation Item 11, Modifications of Conditions of Final Approval. Item 12. Small Project Development Review Fee Schedule, #62-93A. Item 13. Platinum Auto Brokers PUD, Final, #36-94. Item 14. Overland Trail Annexation and Zoning, #9-94,A. Item 15. Country Club North Rezoning, #39-94. Item 16, spring Creek Village PUD, Preliminary, #2-87N. Item 17. Northbrook Patio Homes at Fairbrooke PUD, Final,#7-94B. CONSENT AGENDA• Member Strom moved that Item 12 be placed on the consent agenda from the discussion agenda. Member Cottier seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes August 22, 1994 Page 2 Member Strom moved approval of Items 1-8 and 10-12. Member Fontana seconded the motion. Notion carried 7-0. DISCUSSION AGENDA: Item 9. Falcon Ridde,Final. #2-940 Mr. Steve Olt, Project Planner, read the staff report with recommendations. Mr. Olt spoke of approval by the Board, June 6, with two conditions specified at preliminary to be met before final --access plan and sketch plans for elevations prior to final PUD. These conditions have been met. There were two appeals of the Planning and Zoning Board's decision that the City Council upheld. There was a requirement that the developer provide a plat and appropriate PUD documents signed by the property owners of record, which has been met. Lucia Liley spoke to the Board representing Sand Creek Associates, developer of the project. She mentioned that Ed Lawler and Pete Sherman, two principals, were present and available to answer questions. She spoke of Mr. Power's earlier filed appeal of ownership, which was denied by City Council. She requested to speak after Mr. Powers was heard by the Board. CITIZEN INPUT Mr. Ed Powers - 2044 Terry Lake Ave. - Mr. Powers spoke of ownership issues, specifically an index of the documents submitted to the Board and ownership records. He gave a brief presentation with a map illustrating the questioned property ownership issues. He spoke of drainage issues and indicated they were not near final. He requested the Board to either (1) deny the plat or (2) modify the final plat with conditions he submitted to the Board, (detention pond removal on the Falcon Ridge Final Plan from the triangular area and all land owned by the Larimer-Weld Reservoir and the County, with rights, and consent of all property owners of the plat). Bob Penny - Law Firm of Sommermeyer, Wick Dow and Campbell - Mr. Penny represented the Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company. He spoke of meetings with the Powers family and ownership of areas and "chain of title." Neither the developer nor the title company have a "chain of title" to show ownership. The Reservoir Company opposes the development at this time because there are volumes of water still running off from agricultural property. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes August 22, 1994 Page 3 He spoke of the retention and reservoir ponds in the area being inadequate. He spoke of lack of signage on the plat, water run- off, quality of water, monitoring overflows. He spoke of willingness to work with developer for the "chain of title" and requested a delay. Carl Spaulding - 312 Spaulding Lane - He spoke of owning property west of the development and appreciated the access road plans. His main concern is that his property not become a play area and requested "no trespassing" signs with a 6-foot high fence at the rear of the homes. Jerry Manning - 2106 Ford Lane - Mr. Manning spoke of the new plans for 61 dwelling units and that the original plans called for 60. He questioned if the LDGS requirement of 1% increase would be met? Jeannine Hammond - 505 Country Club Road - Ms. Hammond spoke of unanswered questions at neighborhood meetings regarding: density, emergency response with partial city and county boundaries, maintenance of streets, types of homes, elevation plans, air, and utilities (water pressure specifically). She requested they be addressed. Tim Carney - 2101 Sandstone Drive - Mr. Carney spoke of his opposition to the project with regard to the inter -governmental agreements (IGA) and their complexity. He was not opposed to growth. The State Highway does not have pedestrian access, Country Club Road is a collector with no sidewalk. He voiced concerns about how children would get to school safely, and the infra -structure issues. He spoke of a project near Anheuser- Busch being developed and their access limitations, forcing use of Country Club Lane. He requested the infra -structure be reviewed and planned before development. CITIZEN INPUT CLOSED. Ms. Lucia Liley spoke of Mr. Powers comments --that they were the same issues aired at the City Council appeal. She spoke of ownership and title issues assuring Sand Creek as owner. She submitted into the record a document dated July 11, 1994, from which she read items A-D. She spoke of the City not functioning as a court for these issues. Mr. Powers claim needs to be filed through the courts. Poudre R-1 has set up buses for transpor- tation of students to the Tavelli School. Chair Clements spoke of land ownership issues. Mr. Eckman spoke of a submittal requirement which is complete with the plat containing a attorney's certificate. This states that the Planning and Zoning Board Minutes August 22, 1994 Page 4 persons signing the plat are the owners and proprietors, as defined in the State Statutes. He verified that it was signed by an attorney, Rick Zier. It is not appropriate for the City to arbitrate the ownership of the property; however, he offered services of dialog between parties to discuss and resolve ownership issues. If they cannot be resolved, the proper form would be to file in court. The City does not have authority to make legal ownership decisions. Chair Clements spoke of development agreement issues. Mr. Olt read and clarified from a printed statement the standard development agreements required of the City. Storm water and water quality issues would be addressed by Basil Hamden. Mr. Hamdan, Storm Water Department, spoke of preliminary plans needing more information and that the new plans were submitted one week ago. There are several concerns of downstream conveyance, quality of the water, and conditions that have to be met prior to approval of overall plans. He stated that there will be two to three months of working time required and he believed issues can be resolved. Chair Clements spoke of "no trespassing" signs and responsibility for posting as well as fencing. Mr. Olt said it would be the right of Mr. Spaulding to post signs on his property or a negotiation with the property owner. The six-foot fence could be negotiated; it is not part of the final plan. Chair Clements spoke of increase in dwelling units (from 60 to 61) for the project. Mr. Ed Lawler of Sand Creek addressed the Board, stating the change occurred with the street and gas line re -alignments. Mr. Olt spoke of the LDGS stipulations in Section F5, page 93, for final plans and read the compliance issues. He stated 1% is allowed for increase. Staff believes it does not change the general character of the overall intent of the development, setback or appearance of street frontage on Ford Lane. A variance would be required with the motion by the Board. Chair Clements spoke of Ford Lane and street improvements. Mr. Olt indicated there would be curb, gutter and sidewalk on the new development and the maintenance is a City -County issue. He also said response for fire alarms will be covered by the Poudre-Fire Authority. Mr. Phillips spoke of emergency issues being resolved for police protection by both.City and County protection. Chair Clements spoke of Spaulding Lane and its improvements. Mr. Mike Herzig, engineer, said it is a city -county owned street, with a special improvement district, complies to UGA standards, and has a 32-foot street width. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes • August 22, 1994 Page 5 Chair Clements spoke of access to Tavelli School as the "crow flies" distance and the standard of measurement for location distance to schools. Mr. Olt said the standard will remain until it is changed by Council. Mr. Eckman read the requirement by City Council regarding LDGS requirements and stated that the project plat be certified by an attorney in accordance with Colorado Statutes. Member Bell spoke of improvements on Country Club Road. Mr. Olt said street, sidewalk, curb and gutter improvements will be made on the project site along Highway 1. Member Bell spoke of a functional plan. Mr. Vosburg said improvements to Country Club Road will be tied to development, there will be undeveloped parcels and a possible special improvement plan. Member Walker spoke of time required for these types of infra- structure improvements to be made within the City and mentioned several on -going projects. . Member Walker moved to approve the Falcon Ridge Final, #2-94G, with a variance for the additional dwelling unit in the project. Member Strom seconded the motion. Chair Clements summarized that there will be more time required to meet standards before a building permit will be issued and safeguards will be made for all concerns of this project. Mr. Eckman suggested that the parties -in -interest work with Mr. Herzig in the drafting of the development agreement, particularly so that it addresses Mr. Penny's water quality and safety concerns, as well as the other technical concerns. Mr. Eckman also suggested that it might be possible to assist in helping to alleviate concerns that Mr. Powers may have regarding whether he must appeal the Board's decision (if is should approved the Project) to the City Council in order to avoid an argument that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as a prerequisite to a court appeal. Mr. Eckman suggested a possible solution would be to inquire of the applicant as to whether it would be willing to waive its right to raise the "failure to exhaust administrative remedies" argument in court as it relates to the ownership question, so as to avoid a pointless appeal to City Council. Ms. Liley agreed to the waiver as presented by Mr. Eckman. 0 Planning and Zoning Board Minutes August 22, 1994 Page 6 Chair Clements encouraged Mr. Spaulding to work with the applicant with respect to the "no trespassing" sign. Member Cottier said the access change is an improvement and hoped the developer does whatever he can to keep from making the open space into a playground to the west. Motion passed 7-0. Chair Clements welcomed Member Gary Carnes to the Planning and Zoning Board as replacement for Sharon Winfree, past member. Item 13. Platinum Auto Brokers. PUD - Final, f36-94. Mr. Ted Shepard read the staff report for this project. The action of the Board requires two motions (1) requirements for the variance and (2) PUD itself, as mentioned in the staff report. Mr. Gary Farkas made a brief presentation showing the changes requested of the Board at preliminary, landscaping and mentioned that 3.5 customers visit the business per day. He spoke of surrounding properties, flood code, lots with weeds and other issues. He spoke of the location unique to north Fort Collins and consideration requirements. Dixie Johnson - 1241 Maple - She is owner of Mane Images 2 1/2 years. She met landscaping requirements of the City that has enhanced her place of business. She supported the landscaping requirements. Karen Weitkunat - 1513 N. College - She is owner of Budget Host Inn and a resident for 18 years, president of the North College Business Association, and serves on the North College Corridor Study Committee along with the North Access Control Plan. She applauded new businesses and development in the north. She supported positive image of the business and landscaping and upheld City standards. CITIZEN INPUT CLOSED. Member Cottier spoke of landscaping being minimal, inadequate and had concerns regarding the image for the entrance to north Fort Collins. She requested a setback requirement for display vehicles and was concerned about the number of vehicles parked there and was against a raised car rack for vehicles. Member Strom asked further questions regarding landscaping requirements, amount of vehicles on the lot, landscaping, entrances, depth and setbacks (8 to 12 feet), right-of-way, etc. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes • August 22, 1994 Page 7 He spoke of the importance resolving these issues. Chair Clements asked about a rack display and Mr. Shepard said that could be prohibited in the planning process. Member Cottier commented that a variance would be granted on an acceptable final. She believed that a variance should not be granted until the landscaping is acceptable. She believed that this is not a good planning example for future development to the north. 1. Member Strom moved approval of Platinum Auto Broker landscape plan with the stipulation to modify the landscaping on the development plan, with shrub beds to be increased to two planting beds (each 8 feet by 8 feet east to west), a center island bed, landscaping timbers along all islands, wheel -stops to prevent overhang of vehicles to the beds (a reasonable plan to be approved by planning staff), and restricting use of an elevated rack for display purposes. Member Fontane seconded the motion. • Motion carried 6-1, with Cottier voting in the negative. 2. Member Strom moved approval of the variance for Platinum Auto Brokers PUD, Final, with findings. Member Fontane seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-1, with Cottier voting in the negative. 3. Member Strom moved approval of Platinum Auto Brokers, PUD, Final. Member Fontane seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-2, with Members Bell and Cottier voting in the negative. Item 14 Overland Trail Annexation and Soninc #9-94 A Mr. Ken Waido presented the staff report with a change in the zoning recommendation to RF Zone for the entire 282 acres. Mr. Waido spoke of standard subdivision process (lot size of 2.29 acres) and cluster development plan, increasing overall units per acre, allowing 282 units to be developed (not guaranteed --subject to planning hearings). Mr. John M. Spillane, Esq., Deutsch, Spillane & Reutzel, P.C. 7730 East Belleview Avenue, Suite 206, Englewood, CO 80111, representing the developer Richland Homes. Frank Vaught the • architect of Vaught -Frye Architects was present for questions. He explained goals for the project of less density, larger lot Planning and Zoning Board Minutes August 22, 1994 Page 8 sizes, and protect the foothills. Mr. Spillane spoke of meeting with the neighborhoods and with the County, receiving their input, the RF Zone is selected to protect the stated goals. He spoke of 1.5 units per acre as desirable both to the neighborhood and the County government. The developer will dedicate 112 acres voluntarily at no cost to the City, 262 acres into the RF zone with the ability to develop 262 units, leaving 20 acres for higher density with no more than 160 units to be developed, netting an overall 422 units or 1.5 units per acre. He requested approval of the annexation petition and zoning by the Board. Mr. Frank Vaught, of Vaught -Frye Architects, gave a brief presentation of the proposed area, stating in more detail the development plan. He spoke of the 112 acres dedicated to the City, 35 acres along the west and south sides of the site to expand open space, and in addition another 25 acres for recreational purposes and buffering, totalling 172 acres: 61 percent of the parcel. He spoke of traffic flow, density and scenic quality of the site. He spoke of density to the existing development to the south being 6- to 16-units to the acre. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Kirk Fuller - 1202 Cascade Ct. - Mr. Fuller spoke of density transfer of the full 282 acres with 112 acres of undevelopable land believing this inappropriate. John Barnett - Director of Planning for Larimer County - The Board of County Commissioners recommends the City of Fort Collins annex the property with a zone of Foothills Residential (RF), encouraging clustering, with no development occurring above the 5,250 level and for the City to follow the UGA agreement. Member Strom asked Mr. Barnett about the information regarding the zoning split being available to the County Commissioners. Mr. Barnett responded by stating the UGA would be exceeding in density if there was split zoning (RLP/RF) which would require an amendment to the UGA. Member Strom also asked about the 1.5 acre maximum development. Mr. Barnett spoke of history of the project. Rick Bockman - 3036 Wells Fargo - Mr. Bockman spoke of density, traffic concerns relative to the development, drainage, detention ponds, development densities at Overland and Elizabeth. Leon Heatherington - 4017 Spruce Drive - Mr. Heatherington spoke of concerns the RLP zoning, not permitted by the Inter - Governmental Agreement or by the Fort Collins Master Plan for the foothills. He spoke of exclusive RF zoning for this area, except Planning and Zoning Board Minutes • August 22, 1994 Page 9 for amendments in the future. In August 1986 the City of Fort Collins passed a resolution indicating they would like to see 1.5 units per acre in the Foothills Master Plan, the approved September final resolution did not include the density. He spoke of the IGA indicating a history from 1981 to 1988 man-hours of work, many public hearings, cooperative joint City -County studies addressing all concerns of planning. He recommended RF zoning for this area. The City of Fort Collins must abide by its rules and regulations. John Kruchten - 1806 Virginia Dale Dr. - Mr. Kruchten spoke of the property above the 5,250 line being dedicated as open space. He believed this was mandatory to be kept as green space under the IGA and will need to be maintained by the City or a homeowner's association, and he also question the 35 acres dedicated along the ridge line. He spoke of the cluster housing not being allowed by the IGA and elimination of the RLP zoning. Moby Wile - 765 Pine Road - Bellevue, CO - Mr. Wile is a county resident. He spoke of supporting the IGA and favored the RF zoning mentioning the hours of time put into the agreements and the expectation of the County residents for these agreements to • be honored in the future to preserve the foothills. He spoke of excluding the area above the 5,250 foot level as part of the formula to calculate density for the area. Jim Davidson - 2278 Clydesdale Drive - Mr. Davidson, an environmental geologist, spoke of his opposition to the RLP zoning on the parcel and annexation which would lead to high density development endangering wildlife habitat, foothill and ridge line protection, traffic and air pollution problems, and impacts of the view. He believed the RLP zoning violates the IGA agreement. Marci Landreth - 2819 Virginia Dale Dr. - Ms. Landreth presented petitions to the Board of 619 signatures who are against the rezoning of the Fort Collins Foothills Area. She spoke of in favor of RF zoning and preservation of the foothills backdrop. Glenn J. Weinhoft - 4025 Spruce Drive - Mr. Weinhoft spoke of the need to honor contracts and agreements, the hours spent developing the IGA and supporting the RF zoning. Erma Maxwell Devers - 729 Rocky Road - Ms. Devers indicated that her grandfather owned all the foothills since 1910, and that this parcel was her father's. Her first concern was the preservation of the foothills and the 60-year old rock house and garage in the islower corner not be destroyed, believing it would be an ideal park area for the development. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes August 22, 1994 Page 10 Bob Davidson - 1203 Cascade Ct. - He spoke of the aesthetic qualities of the Fort Collins area, honoring the IGA, and opposed to the proposed development, air quality, rural character, opposed the densities, concerns of setting a precedence, preservation of the foothills visibility and appearance. John Smeltzer - 3015 W. Lake Street - Mr. Smeltzer spoke of opposition the RLP but supported the annexation with the RF designation. He spoke of insuring the quality that makes Fort Collins what it is today. David Lauer - County Resident - He spoke of his membership of the Larimer County Affordable Housing Task Force. He spoke of the obligation of the IGA with RF zoning. He spoke of encouraging affordable housing and controlling leap -frog development. CITIZEN INPUT CLOSED. Vice Chair Cottier spoke of not discussing development issues until there is a concrete proposal, there will be a time for these concerns. The density issues and preservation of the stone buildings will be discussed at a future time. She spoke of density formula, transfer of density, 5,250 foot elevation area, cluster development and asked Mr. Waido to address them. Mr. Waido stated the annexation would allow a higher density to occur in the City. He spoke of most of property in the Foothills area is FA-1 (farming zone). He spoke of clustering option (1 unit per acre), was intentionally approved by City Council to encourage the annexation of properties. He spoke of a specific development with elevations above 5,250 feet to allow development to proceed by transferring units in calculating densities. There are several review criteria in the RF Zone the Board is required to use when reviewing development plans. Mr. Barnett, Larimer County, answered Member Walker's question concerning the development options if this land were to remain in the County. Mr. Barnett answered that landowners under Colorado State Statues may develop 35 acres or larger, dividing into 8- acre parcels would be allowed to be development without any review of any local government. Mr. Barnett stated that County interpretation if the City refused to annex the property, the property could be developed through the County's development review process, a septic system concept, with possibilities of less density. Member Fontane asked about provision of City sewer services. Mr. Barnett said he assumed if the City chose not to annex the property, the City would not provide sewer services; however, if it is annexed, the services would follow. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes • August 22, 1994 Page 11 Member Walker spoke of the IGA and Foothills Master Plan and asked for further clarification. Mr. Waido responded that in 1986 after review and public hearings, an amendment was made to the Urban Growth Agreement which brought all private properties west of Overland Trail into the UGA. During the process, it was recognized this was a unique area and it may not be appropriate to encourage the density to be the same as other density areas of the UGA. The City chose to have a cluster development option of one unit per acre with the RF, in conformance with the IGA, is compatible. A one unit per acre designation is allowed through a "special use" review, not a guaranteed density. In 1986, the RF Zone went through several changes and modifications before adoption. Vice -Chair Cottier summarized that the RF Zone was adopted by ordinance and supersedes the resolution that may have suggested 1.5 units per acre. Mr. Eckman confirmed her statement and said that the residential density of the development within the area to be added by this resolution should be "closely controlled" to the extent legally permissible. He said the RF Zone, having been adopted by ordinance, governs within the City limits as far as zoning is concerned. Mr. Eckman read the purpose statement of . the RF Zone which indicates low residential for the foothills. Vice -Chair Cottier asked what process needs to be made to amend the IGA? An application to both City and County Planning Departments would need to be made simultaneously. The UGA is a zoning district in the County, so the amendment process is a zoning request, requiring public hearings in all governments and governing boards. Vice -Chair Cottier spoke of variance consideration, RF zoning and avoidance of amending the IGA or UGA. Mr. Waido said the City Code is specific allowing conditional zoning by the Charter, but zoning conditions cannot place uses and densities that are not allowed in the zone. A zoning condition could be placed on the property, limiting potential densities. Densities changes are possible through amendment to the RF Zone, allowing a PUD option. There are ten criteria the Board uses to evaluate a "cluster" with over 50 criteria in the PUD code. Mr. Eckman restated that the RF Zone would have to be changed so that the density would be different. It would not be a "variance" but an "amendment" to the code. Member Walker spoke of issues of City policies regarding this unique area. He was in favor of the dedicated land above the 5,250 foot elevation and the RF Zone, and compliance to the IGA . and UGA policies. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes August 22, 1994 Page 12 Member Walker moved to aaaex the Overland Trail property and zone it RF. Member Bell seconded the motion. Vice -Chair Cottier stated this motion is a recommendation to City Council and there will be two hearings before a zoning change is made, and the applicant can request a different zone at that time. Mr. Eckman confirmed the statement. Member Strom inquired about the Stuart Annexation, splitting of the RF and RLP zones. Mr. Waido said that all annexations are reviewed on a case -by -case basis and mentioned specifics.. Mr. Phillips clarified that the extension of Overland Trail south and the anticipated alignment actually a separation line between the RLP Zoning on the Stuart Property and the RF Zoning; Overland Trail is also mentioned in the Foothills Study and the IGA as a boundary between the Foothills Area and other areas, mentioning the discrepancies on the map for interpretation. Mr. Phillips clarified to the Board the location of specific areas surrounding and including the proposed annexation. Member Carnes spoke of the balanced views, histories and possibilities given for this proposed project and appreciated the clarifications. Member Bell spoke of support of the motion. Member Fontane spoke of RF Zone district and read from the staff report concerning density, cluster development options, and rural street standards. Mr. Waido explained the clustering concept and other standards concerning the project. Member Fontane said she would not be supporting the motion. Member Fontane also stated that agreements and documents do change and this is a reasonable proposal and believed densities could work. Member Strom asked for clarification of Overland Trail as the boundary line. Mr. Waido said the only area where it is not the eastern boundary is the area south of Horsetooth Road and the mid -section line is the boundary there (the western boundary of the Springfield Subdivision.) There was discussion of Policy 1.1, page 5 of staff report, and Section 1 of the County Land Use Plan, concerning density. Member Strom was satisfied with the proposal of the applicant and said the agreement interpretation was adequate. He spoke of a reasonable case for amending the agreement and taking closer look at the area north of Overland Trail in the Foothills Area. Vice -Chair Cottier said she would support RF Zoning, because she desired consistent interpretation of policy, stating it was Planning and Zoning Board Minutes August 22, 1994 Page 13 clearly defined in this annexation. Transportation concerns made her decision change from RLP to RF Zone for lower density to protect the Foothills. Notion carried 5-1. Member Fontana voting in the negative and Chair Clements abstaining for conflict of interest. Item 15. Country Club North Rezoninc. #39-94, Mr. Ken Waido presented the staff report and recommended RLP zoning with the PUD condition. Mr. Eldon Ward with Cityscape Urban Design and Jim Postal with the James Company were present to answer questions of the Board. Mr. Ward spoke of the rezoning request stating it has no development proposal at this time. CITIZE Karl H. Swenson - 3404 Carte Almaden - Mr. Swenson stated he represented the Serrmonte Highlands Property Owners Association. He spoke of this location to the proposal and a petition for a • moratorium in this region until there was planning for the future of the area. The association desires a master plan and has concerns for transportation and density issues. He submitted a petition stating concerns. Shirley Knox - 2505 N. County Road 11 - She spoke of her location among three proposed developments. She asked if RLP Zoning for the City is the lowest allowed? She was opposed to commercial development in the area. She supported the previous comments regarding a master plan for the area. Mr. Waido addressed the issue of lack of planning and stated the Northeast Area Transportation Study reviewed the Master Street Plan for the area and re -designated streets, land use assumptions made to serve as an overall development plan for the area and suggested a copy be procured from the Transportation Department. Chair Clements spoke of the Board not having the authority to designate a moratorium. Concerns of this nature need to be addressed to City Council and suggested that their Council Member for their District be contacted. Mr. Waido spoke of PUD process allowing commercial areas within a development and other zoning issues concerning densities and the UGA plan. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes August 22, 1994 Page 14 Member Strom moved approval of the Country Club North Rezoning, #39-94 with RIP and with the PUD condition. Member Pontane seconded the motion Motion carried 7-0. Meeting adjourned 11:00 p.m. with items 16 and 17 postponed to August 29, 1994.