HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning And Zoning Board - Minutes - 09/04/2003Council Liaison: Karen Weitkunat Staff Liaison: Cameron Gloss
Chairperson: Mikal Torgerson
Vice Chair: Jerry Gavaldon
Phone: (W) 416-7435
Phone:(H) 484-2034
Chairperson Torgerson called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m.
Roll Call: Schmidt, Colton, Meyer, Carpenter, Craig, and Gavaldon.
Staff Present: Gloss, Eckman, Stanford, Jones, Olt, Deines.
Director of Current Planning Cameron Gloss reviewed the Consent and
Discussion Agendas:
Consent Agenda:
1. Minutes of the April 10, 2003 Planning and Zoning Board
Hearing. (Continued)
2. #23-03 City of Fort Collins Vehicle Storage and Operations Service
Maintenance Facility Rezoning
Discussion Agenda:
3. #35-99A 607 Cowan Street Project Development Plan
4. #56-98R Rigden Farm, 8th Filing, The Shops at Rigden (King Soopers)
Project Development Plan
5. #56-981J Rigden Farm, 10c' Filing, Pioneer Charter School Site Plan
Advisory Review
6. #29-03 326 Cherry Street Modification of Standards
Planning Director Gloss stated that the August 21, 2003 meeting minutes
would be completed in the next week in preparation for a City Council
Report regarding the Vine Drive and 1-25 Rezoning.
Member Schmidt moved for approval of Consent Item 2. Member Craig
seconded the motion.
Member Colton stated that he had been concerned about the City of Fort
Collins Vehicle Storage and Operations Service Maintenance Facility
Rezoning given that the site had originally been zoned Public Open Lands.
Doug Moore, with the City Natural Resources Department, informed
Member Colton prior to the hearing, that the property had not been
purchased with Open Space money as the City does not rezone POL
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 2
parcels that have been purchased with Open Space money. The POL zone
was a carry-over from years ago.
Member Craig requested that a draft of the minutes be provided at the
Friday worksession prior to presenting City Council with the
recommendation.
Director Gloss replied that could be done.
The motion was approved 6-0.
Project: 607 Cowan Street — Project Development Plan,
#35-99A
Project Description: Request for a 16 unit multi -family complex
located at the southwest corner of Cowan
Street and Myrtle Street. The multi -family
buildings will be arranged into four 4-unit
buildings, two stories in height. Off street
parking will be provided in both surface parking
stalls and in attached garage units. The
currently located single family home will be
razed. The property is zoned NCM —
Neighborhood Conservation Medium Density
District.
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Hearing Testimony, Written Comments and Other Evidence:
Director Gloss gave the staff presentation, recommending approval. Director
Gloss stated that the building elevations on the south will be similar in size to that
of a single-family home. The elevations on the west and east will be larger in
mass. Parking will be provided at the back of the lots abutting the alley. There is
also a substantial amount of on -street parking. Contextually, there are single-
family houses to the east, apartments to the south, north, and west. A
neighborhood meeting was conducted on May 20, 2002 with 4 neighbors in
attendance. The main issues were related to building compatibility and on -street
parking influences. Water pressure issues and alley and street improvements
were also questioned at the meeting. Director Gloss pointed out an error on page
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 3
9 of the staff report in which the zone district is referred to as E, Employment.
The zone district should be NCM — Neighborhood Conservation Medium Density
Mark Schlang with Thomas Lang Architects offered to answer any questions as
the applicant. He did not have an additional presentation.
Public Input
Kathy Norris, 624 Stover Street, gave her testimony to the Board. She stated that
she was excited to see the property being redeveloped; however, she expressed
concern regarding alley access for the primary parking at the location. She stated
that there are a few existing parking spaces across the alley from the site and
that those cars tend to travel at a high rate of speed down the alley. The
proposed site is designed such that all the parking will be accessed via the alley
and Ms. Norris would like to see the site reversed so that the parking access
would be from the street instead of the alley.
Carl George, 612 Cowan Street, gave his testimony to the Board. He also
expressed concern over the high use of the alleys as well as the on -street
parking situation given the high number of apartments, visitors, and renters in the
area.
Sarah Dentom, 601 Colorado, gave her testimony to the Board. She stated that
she was present at the May 2002 neighborhood meeting and understood that the
units were 2-bedroom with full basements. Her concern was whether or not the
plan allowed for enough parking spaces for the actual number of bedrooms
which will eventually occupy the property.
Karen Balog, 521 Stover Street, gave her testimony to the Board. She stated that
she was pleased with the exterior of the building but that she was also concerned
with traffic and speeding on the streets in the area and stated that the proposed
complex would add 32 to 48 cars to the neighborhood.
Public Input Closed
Vice -Chairperson Gavaldon asked Director Gloss and the applicant to address
the parking and traffic issues brought up during Public Input.
Director Gloss stated that 28 parking spaces are required and provided in the
plan, based on the bedroom count of the units. One citizen was concerned about
the basements potentially being bedrooms. As there are emergency egress
requirements, the architect will need to be asked if the basements are being
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 4
provided with those and whether or not the basements are being counted as
bedrooms.
With respect to spill -over parking, there is about 350 feet of frontage available for
on -street parking on the two street sides of the corner lot, excluding the no
parking zones at the corners.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked the applicant to respond to the question
regarding basements.
Mr. Schlang replied that the basements are unfinished and that part of the review
criteria was that the basements not be finished or used as bedrooms. If the
basements were to be finished, a building permit would have to be pulled. There
is not enough parking to accommodate an increase in bedrooms, thus any
application for a permit to finish the basements would likely be denied by the
City. There are windows in the basements, however a specific size has not been
determined.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked if the windows would be designed as egress.
Mr. Schlang replied that if the City required that they not be egress windows, they
would not be designed that way.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked Mr. Schlang to comment on the alley access and
traffic issues.
Mr. Schlang replied that the drive aisle between the southern two buildings
continues all the way through the site, thus providing access to Cowan Street.
Circulation could therefore occur from Cowan Street for those 8 units. That
access was required by the fire department. Additionally, each unit has a single -
car garage making 16 of the parking spaces within the building. The buildings are
for sale units at this time, not for rent. It would be possible for them to be rented
at a later date, however. There are improvements required by the City for the
alley.
Director Gloss stated that the alley would be required to be improved to City
standards including undergrounding any utility service lines, addressing any
drainage issues, and paving the alley to width standards. The project would
generate about 120 trips per day, based on traffic counts. Given the performance
of existing intersections in the area, staff did not find any problem meeting the
level of service standards in the area, both for vehicle and pedestrian/bicycle
traffic.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 5
Vice -Chairperson Gavaldon asked Ward Stanford, with the Traffic Operations
Department, to address the speeding concerns.
Mr. Stanford replied that the neighbors could contact the Neighborhood Traffic
Safety Program to do some possible mitigation. Primarily the issue is one of
enforcement and the neighbors can contact the police department to ask them to
police the roads and alleys occasionally.
Member Craig asked if the mitigation could be done in the alley as well as the
street — could a speed bump be put in the alley?
Mr. Stanford replied that speed bumps would not be placed in alleys and that
their narrow width is designed to keep speeds low. Speed bumps have not been
found to reduce speeds as drivers slow down to approach them and then speed
up faster. Speed bumps also add to noise.
Member Craig reiterated that mitigation measures could only be taken in the
streets, not the alleys. Member Craig asked if the alley was currently dirt and if
paving the alley would worsen the traffic and speeding situation.
Director Gloss replied that the alley is currently gravel and that only the north end
of the alley abutting the property would be paved. Arguments in support of paving
the alley include a reduction in mud and spread gravel. Conversely, paving may
promote high traffic speeds and more use. Paving the north end of the alley
should help concentrate the trips there rather than all the way through the block.
There is no way to control the exact traffic pattern however.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked the applicant why the single-family house is
being razed rather than being relocated to a vacant lot.
Mr. Schlang replied that it was the developers choice, likely related to cost-
effectiveness. The house did not fall within any historic guidelines.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked if a Homeowners Association had been set up
Mr. Schlang replied that he did not believe so and that the project had been
started with another developer and was recently sold to another party.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked how the building exterior would be maintained
and how the basements would be prevented from being used as bedrooms.
Mr. Schlang replied that the prior developer did have an association whose
covenants controlled those issues.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 6
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked Director Gloss how assurance could be provided
that the basements would not be finished and rented out as bedrooms.
Director Gloss replied that all parking assumptions have been made on upper
level bedroom calculations.
Member Craig asked why the basements were put in at all, was if for storage?
Mr. Schlang replied that in Colorado, it is a typical means of construction
because of the climate.
Member Craig asked if the parking issues would be revisited should someone
apply for a building permit to finish the basement.
Director Gloss replied that parking would be reviewed.
Member Craig asked where the parking would go.
Director Gloss replied that there are not many options for providing additional
long-term parking.
Member Craig asked what the mitigation was going to be for the tree removal.
Director Gloss replied that five of the trees were considered significant by the
City Forester and that mitigation trees would be provided as per the standards in
Article 3. That mitigation number could be anywhere from 5 to 6 trees depending
on the significance of the tree that is being lost. Director Gloss stated that he did
not know exactly where the mitigation trees were going to be provided but that
City Planner Bob Barkeen had gone through the landscape plan to assure that
the mitigation trees were there.
Member Craig asked if the trees could be smaller in number but each larger in
size.
Director Gloss replied that the Code standards state that appropriate mitigation is
left to staff discretion with advice from the City Forester. There are minimum
sizes for trees in the Code.
Member Craig asked if the option of getting larger trees could be explored.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 7
Member Craig asked about the pedestrian level of service and how it is
determined. She asked if sidewalk access to the area school and Albertson's
shopping center would fit into these criteria.
Mr. Stanford replied that much of the pedestrian level of service criteria works for
newly developing areas but that directness, connectivity, and ease of access
standards to apply. Sidewalk improvements to current standards are required. A
radius of approximately 1000 to 1320 feet around the project is considered with
respect to connectivity.
Director Gloss added that we have had some projects in the last few years where
off -site sidewalk improvements have been required. There is always a value
judgment on what appropriate requirements are for the Old Town area.
Member Carpenter asked if the house planned to be raised is not considered
historical on either the national or state levels as well as local, and why is it not
considered historical.
Director Gloss replied that he was unsure.
Member Carpenter asked Mr. Schlang if he knew the age of the house.
Mr. Schlang replied that he did not know the age but that the structure did not
meet the historical age threshold for local, state, or federal. The home had no
designation or history that was deemed significant.
Member Gavaldon stated that the home would be considered historic if it were 50
years old or older.
Member Carpenter replied that there is no age standard locally, historical
significance is all that applies.
Member Gavaldon asked if there was a process for that.
Member Carpenter stated that she believed that the project would have to go to
the Historic Preservation Department if the house were 50 years old or older.
There is usually a letter to indicate the age of the property.
Director Gloss stated that when a project application is submitted containing a
structure that is 50 years old or older, the application is referred to the
Preservation Office within the Advance Planning Department. They then provide
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 8
comment on whether the structure has historic significance and if necessary,
they will take it to the Land Preservation Committee for review and comment.
Member Carpenter asked if this project did go to the Preservation Office.
Director Gloss stated that it was referred to them.
Member Carpenter stated that they usually provide a letter and it was odd in this
case that they didn't.
Member Colton moved for approval of the 607 Cowan Street Project
Development Plan, File #35-99A citing the findings of fact and conclusions,
as amended, in the staff report.
Member Schmidt seconded the motion.
Member Carpenter asked if an amendment could be made to the motion
requiring a letter from the Preservation Office.
Mr. Schlang stated that although there was no letter, the Preservation Office
returned comments on the project indicating that the structure was not historically
significant.
Deputy City Attorney Eckman replied to Member Carpenter that the approval of
the project could be conditioned upon the Planning Director receiving a letter
from the Preservation Office.
Member Carpenter replied that the letter would not need to come back to
the Board as long as Director Gloss and staff did receive the letter.
Member Colton stated that he would accept the amendment to the motion.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon stated that he was hesitant on the information given to
make a decision on this development. He stated concern over the basements
and the process required to get them finished, problems with parking if people do
not go through the permit process to finish them, and problems with unrelated
people living together. He also wanted to make sure an HOA was in place for
architectural review.
Member Schmidt stated that the applicants have done a good job getting the
project to fit in with the neighborhood. There is not much that the Board can do
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 9
with respect to how many people will live in each apartment. The partial
pavement of the alley should help the traffic problems.
The motion was approved 6-0.
Project: Rigden Farm, Bch Filing, The Shops at Rigden
(King Soopers), Project Development Plan
Project Description: Request for a neighborhood service (shopping)
center on 10.5 acres. There will be a total of
114,338 square feet of supermarket, retail and
commercial uses in 7 buildings. A total of 453
parking spaces will be provided on the
shopping center site. The property is located at
the southeast corner of East Drake Road and
south Timberline Road and is zoned NC,
Neighborhood Commercial.
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Hearing Testimony, Written Comments and Other Evidence:
City Planner Steve Olt gave the staff presentation, recommending approval.
Planner Olt stated that the site is at the Southeast corner of Timberline Road and
East Drake Road. The site takes up about 10 acres in a 23-acre neighborhood
center parcel. King Soopers is the base of this project, it is a 66,000 square foot
supermarket with 12,000 square feet of attached retail. As part of Phase One,
there will also be other retail and a bank building. The entire parking lot, 453
spaces, will also be built in Phase One. The project is in compliance with Section
3 and Section 4.19, being the Neighborhood Commercial Center portion of the
Land Use Code. The supermarket is subject to the City's Large Retail
Establishment Section of the Code and it does meet the requirements.
Architecturally, the supermarket will match the other retail buildings in Phase
One.
John Kozlowski, a developer of the project, stated that the project has been in
the process for about two years.
Jeff Anderson, the architect representative for Wyatt and Associates Architects,
gave a presentation. Along Drake Road, two curb cuts are designed to get semi
trucks in and out of the site. These cuts will preserve the existing cottonwood
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 10
trees on the site. There will be an 8 foot masonry screen fence around the
loading dock and truck parking areas. The development to the north of Drake
Road will be screened from noise as well as visually from that loading area.
Mr. Anderson stated that in addition to the existing sidewalks along Timberline,
there will be sidewalks surrounding this development. From the King Soopers,
there will be two pedestrian access spines, one oriented north -south, and a
pedestrian ring internal to the site which passes in front of the King Soopers, in
front of the retail and pad sites, and down to the future bank. Architecturally,
there is a variety of building materials and elevations to make the buildings more
visually appealing.
Public Input
Woody Hesselbarth, 2827 Chase, gave his testimony to the Board. He expressed
excitement about the shopping center being part of the neighborhood. Mr.
Hesselbarth stated concern about slowing traffic down coming off two 40 mph
streets into the parking lots. He also stated that he would like to see bicycle
parking and a bus stop at the site. Mr. Hesselbarth stated concern about the
Land Use Code requirement for turf to be planted between the sidewalks and
street. He would like to instead see excellent xeriscape projects with drip
irrigation to be used as an example.
Carl Glaser, 215 Jefferson and a property owner in Rigden Farm, gave his
testimony to the Board. He praised the design work on the project. He asked if
the Board could waive delays of the project as it would benefit the project as well
as the people of Rigden Farm. He urged the Board to approve this project
unconditionally and allow it to proceed as soon as possible.
Charlie Lanter, 2902 Rigden Parkway and manager of the Master and
Residential Homeowners Associations, stated that feedback that he has received
indicates that the project can not be approved and built fast enough.
Public Input Closed
Member Craig asked Ward Stanford, Traffic Operations Department, to address
the traffic questions. He stated that the right -in, right -out lane is a little shorter
than the full desired length, but it is within the standards. It is not a stop condition,
it is a moving condition. It is likely that the turn is a 25-foot radius turn, not a 40-
foot radius turn as indicated in the traffic study. This will mitigate speeds. There
will not be speed bumps on roadways of that type. There is responsibility placed
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 11
on the users to abide by traffic laws when using the lanes. The turn meets all
standards.
Member Craig asked Planner Olt if it was a 25-foot radius.
Planner Olt replied that he was unsure.
Mr. Anderson replied that it is a 25-foot radius.
Planner Olt stated that the future transit stop will be in the southwest corner of
the site.
Mr. Anderson replied that the stop will be on northbound Timberline between
Custer and the right -turn access, in the deceleration lane.
Member Craig asked Mr. Stanford if Drake Road heading east would be two
lanes and Drake Road heading west would be one lane going into two lanes.
Mr. Stanford replied that there are two eastbound lanes of Drake Road east of
Timberline. It is proposed to be a four -lane in time and this project is providing
funds for that. Westbound Drake on the west side of Timberline is four -lane.
Drake and Ziegler will both be improved to four -lane roadways in the future.
Member Craig asked what Drake would look like with the build -out of this project.
Mr. Stanford replied that it would be four -lane, two lanes in each direction.
Linda Ripley, VF Ripley Associates, spoke regarding the landscaping issues. The
developer has stated that a xeriscape landscape is desired; that has been
provided while also meeting the City standards for a center like this. Xeriscape
design includes many principles other that just eliminating blue grass. Shrub
areas have been increased and turf areas decreased as much as possible. An
irrigation system will put all the trees and shrubs on drip systems and the turf on
a pocket system. The turf is only identified as turf at this time, the type has not
yet been determined. Some of the fescue mixes that require less water than blue
grass do not last as long in a drought situation. Blue grass does not often need
as much water as people use on it.
Member Craig asked Mr. Stanford about the truck route heading toward Ziegler
because that area can not handle truck traffic. She asked what staff had
determined when looking at the truck routes.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 12
Mr. Stanford replied that trucks currently run up and down Drake and Ziegler
quite often and that the roads will handle the traffic.
Member Craig expressed concern over the volume of traffic.
Mr. Stanford stated that staff cannot tell them not to use that route as other truck
traffic has been successfully doing so for years.
Mr. Stanford stated that he may have been wrong about Drake being a four -lane
road. He asked the applicant's engineer what the current plans are, stating that
the road may actually be a three -lane cross section.
Ron Bellits (?), the traffic study engineer for the project, stated that west of
Timberline Road, Drake Road is a four -lane arterial. East of Timberline Road,
Drake Road is classified as a two-lane arterial. It will have a four -lane cross
section as it approaches the Timberline intersection but in a few hundred feet to
the east, it will narrow down to a three -lane cross section with a center turn lane.
Member Craig asked if the Master Street Plan showed Drake as a two-lane at
that location.
Mr. Bellits replied that it did. It is a two-lane cross section as it wraps all the way
around and becomes Ziegler Road up until it hits Horsetooth. At Horsetooth,
Ziegler becomes a four -lane cross section again.
Member Craig asked what the big box threshold is for leaving a pedestrian gap
between buildings.
Planner Olt replied that the Land Use Code shows no such requirement in the
Large Retail Establishment Section.
Member Carpenter asked if the standards required an alternate building entrance
to the store.
Planner Olt replied that the supermarket only has one entrance but that the
attached retail has 5 or 6 separate points of entry.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon stated that the Home Depot on Harmony Road was
required to have two points of entry.
Planner Olt replied that the code states "All sides of a large retail establishment
that directly face an abutting public street shall feature at least one customer
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 13
entrance. All entrances shall be architecturally prominent, clearly visible from the
abutting public street. Where a large retail establishment directly faces more than
two abutting public streets, this requirement shall apply to two sides of the
building." He added that this project does not face two streets.
Member Craig asked about the screening along Drake — Mr. Anderson stated
that the screen was 8 feet in height, on the site plan it is 10 feet in height, and
Planner Olt mentioned that it is 10 feet in height.
Planner Olt replied that he scaled it at 10 feet from the plan.
Member Craig stated her concern about the size of the screen as far as scale in
going past it. She asked about the possibility of putting in evergreen trees or
shrubs along the wall and how they would fit into the existing trees.
Planner Olt replied that the trees are between the sidewalk and the masonry
screen wall. We could ask the applicant if they would be agreeable to putting
some evergreens in there but it may not improve the situation visually.
Member Craig asked if the trees are existing or will be planted.
Planner Olt replied that they will be planted.
Linda Ripley stated that there are 4 trees planned for that area but it is at the
most an 8-foot wide strip. In between and under the trees, there are junipers on
each end and a broadleaf evergreen that will climb up the wall a bit.
Mr. Anderson replied that the masonry screen height is not specifically
designated on the plan right now. With this close proximity between the wall and
sidewalk, a 10-foot wall may be a little imposing. Mr. Anderson stated that they
would commit to an 8-foot wall.
Ms. Ripley stated that she was unsure of how high the broadleaf evergreen
would grow but she could substitute the species for one that would certainly
cover the wall.
Member Carpenter asked about the pedestrian walkways between the shopping
center and the Pioneer Charter School.
Planner Olt stated that there would likely be a sidewalk with future development,
there is currently intervening property that does not have a development proposal
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 14
on it. The issue has not been addressed as to whether or not the center would be
required to make that pedestrian connection.
Member Carpenter stated that has been a requirement in the past, especially
with a school involved.
Director Gloss stated that both properties front on Custer Drive which will have a
detached public sidewalk along it after completion of this project.
It was determined that the sidewalk is already existing.
Member Colton stated concern over the Drake and Timberline frontages having
no entrances. He stated that the intent of the big box standards was to have
multiple entrances and that perhaps this design was not meeting the intent of the
standard.
Planner Olt replied that the side of the building facing Drake Road is the service
and truck entrance. There is a direct public sidewalk connection from Timberline
to the grocery store entry. Planner Olt stated that he could not recall any other
supermarkets, other than Toddy's, that have multiple entrances. Though the
project has an internal entrance into the store, it does provide direct pedestrian
connectivity to Timberline Road.
Member Colton asked the applicant to address the possibility of putting in
another customer entrance.
Mr. Anderson stated that the big box on the site will be not only the King
Soopers, but also the attached retail buildings. This does allow for multiple
entrances.
Member Schmidt asked if there were entrances into the back of the retail from
the rear parking.
Mr. Anderson replied that the building is not a two-sided building. There will not
be any cut -through pedestrian traffic. There are emergency and employee
access doors at the rear of the building. There is unobstructed pedestrian access
from Timberline Road to the King Soopers entrance.
Member Colton clarified that the other retail entrances are referred to as "Retail
A" and "Retail B" on the site plan. He stated that he didn't consider those
entrances to be other entrances into the big box.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 15
Vice-chairman Gavaldon asked Planner Olt how the City applied the big box
standards to the King Soopers itself with the two attached retail buildings.
Planner Olt replied that based on the definition of Large Retail Establishment, the
King Soopers and the attached retail stores A and B are one building and are
subject to the Large Retail Establishment criteria.
Member Carpenter moved for approval of the Rigden Farm, 8`h Filing, The
Shops at Rigden Farm (King Soopers) Project Development Plan, File #56-
98R citing the findings of fact and conclusions in the staff report.
Member Meyer seconded the motion.
Member Craig stated that she commended the applicant for putting in exactly
what City Plan called for in the area but she expressed concern about the project
truly meeting the big box standards.
Planner Olt stated that supermarkets are exempt from the parking distribution
standard in the Large Retail Establishment section of the Land Use Code. The
fact that all parking is on the south side of the building and is not distributed
around, does meet the code because of this exemption.
Member Colton stated that if this project actually does meet the big box
standards, he would be concerned about the big box section being written
properly. He thought the intent was not to have a 66,000 square foot building with
only one entrance in the middle. He stated he would like clarification on the
multiple entrance standards.
Member Carpenter stated that the King Soopers on Harmony only has one
entrance and that this project cannot really be held to a different standard.
The motion was approved 6-0.
Project: Rigden Farm, 10th Filing, Pioneer Charter
School, Site Plan Advisory Review
Project Description: Request for a two-story, 26,255 square foot
charter school building on a 4.27 acre site. The
proposed student population will be 360
students in grades 7 though 12. The site
includes an entire block, surrounded by Custer
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 16
Drive on the south, Minnesota Drive on the
east, Limon Drive on the north, and Kansas
Drive on the west. The property is zoned MMN,
Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood.
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Hearing Testimony, Written Comments and Other Evidence:
City Planner Troy Jones gave the staff presentation, recommending approval.
The site is located between Custer Drive and Limon Drive and between Kansas
Drive and Minnesota Drive. The streets are all currently existing.
Planner Jones stated that there have not been adequate buildings existing for
charter and private schools which has forced these schools to move into
buildings that were not intended for school use. This application is refreshing in
that the school is integrated within the neighborhood and seems to be a good fit.
The school has communicated well with the City throughout the process and the
project, though it is not required to, does meet all the standards of the Land Use
Code.
The school is not installing the maximum amount of parking they could, they are
installing athletic fields in a couple locations which could possibly be used for
parking in the future if need be. They would have to go through the City process
when and if they decided to do that.
Steve Steinbicker, Architecture West, gave the applicant's presentation. The
school is an Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound program and is currently
housed at Cimmaron Shopping Center at Shields and Drake.
The new building will involve sustainable techniques, water and energy
conservation, and other environmentally -friendly techniques. The building is
meant to tie in architecturally with the residential as well as the more commercial
uses in the MMN zone.
Some outdoor and experiential learning sites have been included on the site as
well. The site is not developed at 100%.
Public Input
There was no public input.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 17
Public Input Closed
Member Carpenter stated excitement over the overall proposal but expressed
concern over parking. She asked how many of the students will be of driving age.
Kim Nichols, Pioneer Charter School Governing Board President, stated that
some of the 10th 11th and 121h grade students will be of driving age but that the
students see themselves as caretakers of the natural world and that they
consider their impacts on the environment. School policies will encourage
carpooling, bike riding, and taking the bus. There is currently a system at the
existing site so as not to disturb merchants. There will be a workable situation at
the new site as well.
Member Carpenter stated that there is still basically no parking for students
Ms. Nichols stated that there is on -street parking and parking will be added later
if it is absolutely necessary.
Member Carpenter stated that she did not want to see a lot of overflow parking
into the neighborhoods.
Member Craig asked about a particularly large section of the facility on the east
side.
Mr. Steinbicker replied that was the single largest portion of the facility containing
a kitchen and an art room. It is approximately 50 feet wide and 85 feet long. It is
a partial one and two-story. The area is a multi -purpose space.
Member Craig asked if the roof was metal.
Mr. Steinbicker replied that it is metal but it is tied visually to other components
within the building. The color of the roof is a weathered gray. It is not shiny,
reflective, or white.
Member Craig asked Planner Jones about neighborhood compatibility and if this
project is allowed, if future buildings will also want metal roofing.
Planner Jones stated that the school is right in the transition zone between the
residential and commercial parts of the neighborhood. Standing metal seam is a
common commercial roofing material but is not very common in residential
building.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 18
Member Craig asked if the surrounding buildings could claim compatibility if they
wanted large metal slabs because of this roof.
Planner Jones gave Member Craig a visual presentation of the surrounding
properties and possible uses. The current surrounding projects do not have any
metal roofing or siding. If metal were to be used in future developments, it would
have to be toward the west, further away from residential.
Member Craig still expressed concern over a large slab of metal being used as
siding next door.
Planner Jones stated that there is nothing precluding that in the Land Use Code
Member Carpenter stated that the King Soopers was just approved with a
standing seam metal roof and that if the door for compatibility was going to be
opened, it already had been.
Member Colton stated that if the roof was the appropriate color, it could be
attractive.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked Ms. Nichols if there was a traffic pattern
designed for pick-up and drop-off of students.
Steve Steinbicker replied that the site is a one-way in and a one-way out.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked how many people can be stacked in the
driveway.
Matt Delich, who completed the traffic study, replied that at drop-off time, about 6
to 7 cars could be stacked. At pick-up time, about 10 cars could be stacked.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked Ms. Nichols who will be in charge of traffic
control.
Ms. Nichols replied that staff is doing that right now and that they will be within
the parking lot.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon encouraged working with police and City staff on the
parking and traffic issues. He asked if all of the funding was in place to complete
the construction, building, and landscape plans and what the time table of the
project would be.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 19
Corinne Dovan (?) replied that she was working to secure a bond issue for the
building funding. The bond closure is expected to be within the month of
September. At that point, the real estate will be purchased and construction will
begin. Construction will last through about the middle of the summer for opening
in the fall.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked when landscaping would be complete.
Mr. Steinbicker replied that landscaping would likely start in late spring.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked how the Board could be assured that the plans
would be followed exactly.
Ms. Nichols replied that it is a condition of the bond to build a complete and
useable facility as described in the drawings.
Vice-chairman Gavaldon asked who will monitor and ensure the completed
construction.
Ms. Nichols replied that they are certified through the bond company and that it is
very important to the staff, school, and students that the site remains nice. The
Poudre School District has been working with Pioneer throughout the process of
design and planning.
Member Craig asked if all the site plan details need to be met before the school
receives a certificate of occupancy, as with regular projects.
Deputy City Attorney Paul Eckman replied that he did not believe that schools
come through the City for building permits.
Director Gloss confirmed that statement.
Attorney Eckman stated that the Board really does not have the ability to approve
or deny the project but only to make comments and ask for response to those
comments.
Member Colton recommended approval of the Rigden Farm, 10th Filing,
Pioneer Charter School, Site Plan Advisory Review, File #56-98U.
Member Schmidt seconded the motion.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 20
Member Carpenter stated her enthusiasm for the project and stated that she was
excited to have the school as part of the community.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon echoed the comment and praised parties for working
together.
The project was approved 6-0.
Project: 325 Cherry Street, Modification of Standards
Project Description: Request for a modification of standard of
Section 3.2.2(K)(1)(a) of the Land Use Code to
waive the requirement that off-street parking
spaces be provided for up to 9 one bedroom
residential dwelling units on the site. The
applicant intends to submit and application to
redevelop the existing light industrial building
for mixed -use occupancy with commercial
artist and studio spaces and residential units.
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Hearina Testimonv, Written Comments and Other Evidence:
City Planner Troy Jones gave the staff presentation, recommending approval.
Mickey Willis, Paradigm Realty and Development, gave the applicant's
presentation. He stated that this modification was necessary for redevelopment
of a troubled downtown infill site. The project includes adding the sidewalk,
developing landscaping, removing curb cuts, and making the site more
conforming to the existing character of the neighborhood. The site owner will no
longer be operating at this location after redevelopment. Mr. Willis stated that he
has support from the traffic safety engineers that this is an under -parked area.
The project will add about 40 additional diagonal parking spaces.
Mr. Willis stated that models such as "pinched parking" and "park once" will help
to create greater demand for mass transportation and alternative transportation.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 21
Public Input
Stephanie Daigneault, 312 N. Meldrum, gave her testimony to the Board. She
stated concern over the number of actual cars being parked in the area given the
number of bedrooms, customers, and employees. Ms. Daigenault stated that she
believed the City was already considering making diagonal parking on the street
to alleviate existing parking problems; therefore, how is converting to diagonal
parking going to address existing as well as future problems with this
development. She asked if the number of cars the occupants can have will be
limited. Ms. Daigneault also expressed concern about the little amount of
landscaping between the building and the streets.
Manual Martinez, 310 Cherry Street, gave his testimony to the Board. He stated
concern over the parking in the area. He confirmed that the project is allowing 14
parking spaces for the 9 one -bedroom units.
Planner Jones replied that the Land Use Code requires 14 spaces.
Mr. Martinez asked about the commercial use parking.
Charlie Meserlian, 700 North College, gave his testimony to the Board. He stated
that he thought this was a dynamic use of the property and accommodating the
parking would be a positive thing in order to make the project work.
Public Input Closed
Member Schmidt stated that she believed converting the parking to diagonal
would create about 3 spaces in front of each house. She added that the handicap
access parking space should be moved off Cherry Street for safety reasons.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked what the average speed on Cherry Street is,
though it is posed at 25 mph. He also asked what the traffic count is.
Ward Stanford, Traffic Operations, replied that the studies show the average
speed to be 28-32 mph. The traffic count is within the collector street range and
that the street is rated at higher than collector street volume. The street was an
arterial level street in original design. A past public official allowed the street to be
classified to a public street without any plan to mitigate traffic.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon clarified that it is a collector street behaving like a minor
arterial. He added that he was concerned about the on -street parking. He asked
if the City could still employ the diagonal parking outside this development.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 22
Mr. Stanford replied that Meldrum could be converted to diagonal with or without
the project if the City chose to do so. There are currently no plans for the City to
look at that.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked if the residents on Meldrum could petition and
work with City staff to make the street diagonal parking independent of the
project.
Mr. Stanford replied that they could. City traffic staff does not have a problem
with changing the parking as the rest of Meldrum up to this point is diagonal
parking and operating fine.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked if there were plans for Cherry Street to go to
diagonal parking.
Mr. Stanford replied there is probably not a plan for that as the bicycle and
pedestrian traffic is so high.
Member Colton asked how future similar projects would be evaluated and how it
is determined when a "saturation" point is reached with parking. How is an under
parked condition evaluated?
Mr. Stanford replied that it comes down to a need and the best problem -solving
solutions that can be employed.
Member Colton asked who made the decision that this would be an acceptable
plan.
Planner Jones stated that the project was routed to Transportation Planning and
group discussions were held with Transportation Planning, Engineering, and
Advance Planning. The project satisfies three community needs identified in City
Plan and that was a requirement of staff recommending approval for the
modification. The project must also not be detrimental to the public good, a
somewhat subjective measure. Staff determined it was not detrimental to the
public good.
Member Meyer also expressed concern about the parking issue; however, she
stated that as this is an infill project and the lot will not allow them to do anything
else, an exception to the rule may need to be made.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked why affordable housing was being used as a
criteria.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 23
Planner Jones stated that on the last page of the recommendation, there were
two conditions to the recommendation of approval. Condition "B" is that the future
project qualifies as affordable housing as determined by the Advance Planning
staff. The modification would die if the project did not come in with a plan that
satisfies the conditions.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked what happens if they do not meet the criteria.
Director Gloss replied that the applicant would either have to come back with a
compliant plan or another modification.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked how the project would look if the modification
were denied.
Mr. Willis replied that the existing woodshop use could continue or the building
could become all commercial and no housing, as commercial uses would have
maximum parking requirements rather than minimum.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked if the project could be redesigned to include
some off-street parking.
Mr. Willis replied that they could not because the foundation is already in place
and mixed -use building standards include a zero lot line requirement on the
backyard and side yards and a fifteen foot maximum setback on the front yard.
This site has 11 feet on the front, 16 inches in the back, 2.5 feet on the east side,
and 5 feet on the west side. There is no space large enough for a parking space
anywhere on the lot.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon asked about how the building works as a limited use
workshop.
Planner Jones replied that the difference between a non -conforming use and a
permitted limited use is that a non -conforming use must have a building permit
issued within 6 months of the date of calamity. A building containing a permitted
limited use, when damaged by a natural occurrence, can be rebuilt, provided that
to the extent reasonable feasible, such reconstruction complies with the
standards in Articles 3 and 4.
Member Schmidt moved for approval of the 325 Cherry Street, Modification
of Standards, File #29-03, with the conditions listed on page 7 of the staff
report citing reasons b, d, and f in the staff report.
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
September 4, 2003
Page 24
Member Craig seconded the motion.
Member Colton stated that it may be difficult for future projects to work because
this project will be stretching the parking to a maximum. It should not be a
precedent for future projects. Though it will create more parking spaces, it will
also create more demand.
Member Schmidt stated that the new diagonal parking will more than double the
parking on Meldrum Street. This more than satisfies the needs for this project
plus the project is so close to transit areas that walking and biking will be
encouraged. Future projects will need to be evaluated on a case -by -case basis.
Vice -Chairman Gavaldon stated that he would not be supporting the motion
because he did not believe the project was in the best interest of the public good.
He also stated that Meldrum Street could be changed to diagonal parking without
this project. Mr. Gavaldon added that there was still no answer to the question
about where customers and artisans will park. Cherry Street is not behaving like
it was designed to with City trucks and trailers traveling on it.
The motion was approved 4-1 with Gavaldon being the dissenting vote.
There was no other business.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:40 p.m.
Approved by the Board January 15, 2004.