HomeMy WebLinkAboutAir Quality Advisory Board - Minutes - 12/18/2001v i-1Z-v to
MINUTES
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
281 N. COLLEGE AVE.
December 18, 2001
For Reference: Eric Levine, Chair 229-5225
Eric Hamrick, Council Liaison 225-2343
Brian Woodruff, Staff Liaison 221-6604
Board Members Present
John Schroeer, Eric Levine, Mandar Sunthankar, Linda Stanley, Harry Edwards, Jim Denison
Board Members Absent
Nancy York
Staff Present
Natural Resources Department Brian Woodruff, Terry Klahn, Sarah Fox, Lucinda Smith, and
Michelle Pawar
Utilities: Gary Schroeder
Guests
Poudre Health Services District
Janna West Kowalski, Larimer County Health Department
The meeting was called to order at 4:35
Report of the Hydrogen Task Force — Gary Schroeder
Schroeder presented background and an overview of the work completed by the Hydrogen Task
Force. He said the City of Fort Collins has unique attributes to attract hydrogen -related projects.
Some of these attributes are:
- Potential for regional partnerships with CSU and others
- Development of the Mason Street Corridor
- Attributes favorable to testing (high altitude, weather variations, mountains)
- Regional suppliers of hydrogen
- City policies supporting green house gas reduction
The Hydrogen Task Force made the following formal recommendations:
- Introduce hydrogen buses into the TransFort system
- Public education
- Obtain a fleet demo vehicle
- Build hydrogen fueling stations
- Establish partnerships and a demonstration project
- Plan for the future
It was recommended to obtain grant funding to hire a hydrogen program coordinator. The
coordinator would identify outside funding for the program.
The Board will continue this discussion in January. Stanley said it's important to make a
recommendation that staff be directed to try to obtain grant funding for a hydrogen program
coordinator.
Other Business
Brian Woodruff thanked Harry Edwards and John Schroeer for their service to the AQAB.
Effective January 1, 2002, there will be four new members on the AQAB.
Update on Carbon Monoxide Redesignation, Brian Woodruff
Woodruff said he met with staff members of the state Health Department this week. They
presented preliminary results of the modeling of tailpipe emissions. They were using Fort
Collins as a case study of how things change from Mobile 5 to Mobile 6. The State would like to
use 1992 as the base year. That was the first year that Fort Collins was in compliance with CO
standards.
Discussion
• Levine: I was hoping they would let us pick a base year closer to the year 2000.
• Woodruff: Until this week we assumed a base year of 1998. You can see why the state wants
to use an earlier base year — it would allow the state to remove control programs, and it
would allow for some future emissions growth without causing a violation of the standard.
• Levine: It's literally removing air quality. It's in violation of all our policies.
• Woodruff: It would allow air quality to get worse. We have quite a bit of discussion ahead
regarding what to do. I need to talk it over with our director, Service Area Director, and the
City Manager.
• Levine: Let's put this on the agenda for January.
Minutes
Approval of the November 27, 2001 minutes was postponed to January.
Review Action Loe
The action log was not reviewed.
Behind the Drywall Program
Not discussed.
Second -Hand Smoke, Janna West Kowalski, Larimer County Health Department
Kowalski provided an update on what they've been working on. She said the evidence continues
to accumulate that second-hand smoke is a huge health issue. The only business that loses when
communities go smoke free is the tobacco companies.
Discussion
• Dennison: Are you considering the option of a smoking ban in all work places, or just
restaurants? Our focus is increasing awareness and building community support.
• Dennison: So a total work place ban is possible? Yes.
• Sunthankar: How do the restaurant filtration systems work? They remove the odors, but
don't remove the carcinogens. Honeywell has said they stand by their products as far as
comfort and convenience, but they are not making claims they are health products.
• Edwards: One way to strengthen the presentation is to have business owners consider the
energy penalty. It's recommended that the fresh air intake for smoking establishments be 32
Air Quality Advisory Board
December 18, 2001
Page 3 of 4
times that for non-smoking establishments. That carries with it an enormous energy penalty.
In addition to attracting a larger number of non-smoking patrons, they should be concerned
about their energy bill.
• Dennison: It's a real danger to push technology that does a lot to reduce odor, and little to
reduce carcinogenic matter. It's real dangerous. If they remove the ostensible concern, then
people might be deceived into thinking they're in a clean restaurant. People rely on sensory
information to tell them about risks.
Kowalski provided the following statistics:
1. 59% of people surveyed agree that the City of Fort Collins should adopt a standard that
would make all enclosed places smoke free.
2. 60% of people surveyed agree that smoking should not be allowed in restaurants.
3. 63% of people surveyed would favor a City imposed ban on smoking in public buildings and
restaurants.
• Sunthankar: What percent of public places is now smoke free? Less than 40% of the full
service restaurants. When you look at delis and fast food that number goes to 60%.
• Levine: How should we proceed with this issue? Council should hear some of this. What is
the effectiveness of regulatory versus non -enforcement policies? The most effective is to
pass a law. Education is great, but we need both. Education alone doesn't do it.
• Edwards: This is one of my favorite issues. I congratulate Sarah on a program that builds
community consensus. How will you know when you've done enough to build a consensus
to go forward with an ordinance?
• Sunthankar: If 90% of business are smoke free, I don't see the need for an ordinance.
• Levine: What we need to do is look at whether the goal is achievable.
• Stanley: A lot won't happen voluntarily. Many businesses are not going to do it unless the
playing field is level.
• Dennison: Maybe it should be done through initiative. It's not fair for Council members to
have to go through that. It can paralyze the City. Is it hard to put on the ballot? It's very
expensive, and the tobacco industry comes in with a ton of money.
• Sunthankar: I rarely walk into place where I smell smoke. The public is making an
influence, thanks to people like you. The real problem is indoor smoking in residences areas
— spouses and children who have no rights at all.
• Stanley: We should spend time at a future meeting strategizing.
• Levine: This is in the work plan. We're going to be looking closely at regulatory issues.
We'll continue this discussion.
Agenda Planning
Review Council six-month planning calendar
Future Agendas
• MPO regional funding study (unscheduled)
• 2025 Regional Transportation Plan, executive summary (Jan packet)
• Air Quality Survey results (Jan packet)
Clear bike rack
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
ACTION LIST — from Ilarnmhnr inrn .:
ACTION ITEM
.) ✓
WHO
L. {.Lllf
BY...
DONE
I. Draft memo in support of "Behind -the-
Eric and
February
Drywall" program for review at December
Linda
meeting.
2. Draft 2001 AQAB Annual Report
Lucinda
January