HomeMy WebLinkAboutAffordable Housing Board - Minutes - 06/06/2002CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AFFORDABLE HOUSING BOARD
JUNE 6, 2002 MEETING MINUTES
Kay Rios, Chair
Isabel Garity, Vice Chair
Ken Waido, Staff Liaison, 970-221-6753
Board Members Present: Isabel Garity, Joe Hebert, Jon Fairchild, Mary Glode, and
Denise Rogers. Kathleen Cherroff and Kay Rios were excused.
Advance Planning Staff Present: Ken Waido, Maurice Head, and Joe Frank.
Council Members Present: None.
Also Present: Doug Smith, City of Fort Collins Finance Department; Julie Brewen,
Executive Director of the Fort Collins Housing Authority; Chip Steiner, Vice
Chairman of FCHA Board of Commissioners; Mark Beck, Commission on Disability
Chair; Felix Lee, City of Fort Collins Chief Building Official; Michelle Jacobs, Director
of Information for Practical Housing for All; Lou Stitzel, The Resource Assistance
Center; Grace Harris, League of Women Voters.
The meeting was held at 281 N. College Ave., Fort Collins, Colorado. Isabel Garity
called the meeting to order with a quorum present at 4:05 p.m.
New Business
Ken Waido announced that David McKelfresh had resigned from the Board.
Minutes
The minutes of May 2 were corrected to reflect the name of the executive director
of the Fort Collins Housing Authority as Julie Brewen. The first paragraph of Mary
Glode's Liaison Report now reads: Mary reported that she had met this morning
with Julie Brewen, executive director of the Fort Collins Housing Authority. They
discussed a glitch that has developed in the Rigden Farm development that has put
the project on hold. There is some concern over the affordability cap, that
prospective buyers won't buy the capped units if they can make more money
reselling uncapped units.
Isabel Garity's Liaison Report now reads: Isabel attended the Planning and Zoning
work session.
Denise Rogers moved to accept the May 2 minutes as corrected, Joe Hebert
seconded, motion carried unanimously.
Fee Exemption Ordinance
Doug Smith of the Finance Department explained the effect on the Affordable
Housing Trust Fund of using budgetary cash flow to fund fee payments for eligible
projects. He reported that the Finance Committee of City Council has agreed to a
two-year pilot funding program to study whether there is enough cash flow in the
Affordable Housing Board
June 6, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 2
budget to cover the fee exemption program as well as any projects identified
through the Competitive Process. Doug distributed a spreadsheet showing both
historical and projected figures for the Affordable Housing Fund, based on the 10-
year goals set by the Board.
In essence, the figures show that since 1994, the entire amount budgeted for
Affordable Housing projects has not been spent in any one year. The remaining
balance always has been rolled forward into the next year, and City Council always
has allocated additional money from the General Fund each year. The Finance
Department assumes that 75 percent of the Affordable Housing Fund will be spent
in budget years 2003-2010, with the remaining 25 percent rolled forward into the
next year, and that City Council will continue to allocate funds from the General
Fund annually.
During the ensuring discussion, Denise Rogers raised the concern that if the 75/25
historical trend shifts, the budget would not be adequate to cover the projects
committed to in any one Competitive Process cycle. Doug said that concern was
one of the reasons for the two-year pilot study, to see if adjustments to the ratio
are necessary. He added that all affordable housing commitments will be met,
because Council is committed to the fee waiver project and any "debt" incurred is
to the City's General Fund, which would cover any shortfall. His charge from Council
was to come up with a viable way to implement the program without expending
additional resources. The cash flow program, an accepted budgeting process, is a
way to achieve that goal.
In response to a question from Mary, Maurice said fee waivers amount to an
estimated $4400 per rental unit and $6500 per ownership unit.
After this explanation, and reassurance that all approved projects and fee waivers
will be funded, the consensus of the Board was that it was comfortable with the
cash -flow process for funding the fee waiver exemption program. Denise proposed
the following motion:
The Affordable Housing Board appreciates City Council's support for
affordable housing ad we support the use of the Affordable Housing Trust
fund to fund impact fee exemptions without a negative impact on
affordable housing projects.
Joe Hebert seconded; motion passed unanimously.
Maurice explained that beginning with the next Competitive Process cycle,
developers will be able to indicate whether they require the fee exemption as part
of the application, rather than using the first -come -first -served entitlement process
currently in place. Joe Frank added that Council will set a cap on the amount of
money available for fee waivers each year. Mary was in favor of the Board being
able to recommend full or partial awards of waivers for each project as part of its
input to the Competitive Process. Joe Frank and Maurice agreed that some minor
adjustments to the existing ordinance will be needed; staff is in the process of
Affordable Housing Board
June 6, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 3
developing options for Council. After further discussion, Jon proposed the following
motion:
The Affordable Housing Board supports including the impact fee
exemption program in the Competitive Process and prefers inclusion in
the Competitive Process over an entitlement program.
Mary seconded; motion passed unanimously.
Riaden Farm Update
Julie Brewen and Chip Steiner provided a follow-up to last month's report by Mary
on the collapse of the affordable housing portion of the Rigden Farm development.
Julie acknowledged that from the beginning of the textbook mixed -income, mixed -
unit, new -urbanism project, the biggest issue was the housing market in Fort
Collins. The greatest concern was that buyers of lower -end properties, in the
$160,000-$170,000 range, would be more likely to purchase in a subdivision
without deed restrictions in hopes of realizing a greater appreciation on their home
investment. Julie noted that Rigden Farm did not approach the estimated 20-25
percent under -market pricing required to offset the deed restrictions, and that the
Authority did not hold the land rights on the development. She said the Authority's
Board had decided to slow down and not take as much risk with grant money as
the deal took on a different structure and mix of units.
Jon asked what can be done differently in the future to make such projects work.
Julie answered that either the developers have to take the majority of the risk or
the Authority has to have the majority of the control over the project. He added
that the issue of deed restrictions will become more important as the Board works
with the Nexus study. Ken pointed our that nonprofits like the Authority can't do it
all; the question is how to keep private developers responsible for implementing
any deed restriction program, because it's ultimately the buyer who winds up with a
restricted deed. Julie added that this could be particularly disadvantageous to
buyers in a market with rising interest rates.
Julie also reported on her research into barriers to homeownership for those at 60
percent of AMI. The biggest barrier was not available product, as is generally
assumed, but the attitude of potential buyers that their first home has to be a
detached single family unit. It was agreed that there should be more focus on
educating first time homebuyers and realtors on alternatives. Joe Frank suggested
rethinking the role of the Board if there is a supply of housing available for buyers
below the local AMI; should it be focused on down -payment assistance only?
While Rigden Farm proved a big disappointment, Julie said the Authority has
learned a lot that will be useful in shaping future projects.
Affordable Housing Board
June 6, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 4
Practical Housing For All Initiative
Mark Beck and Felix Lee gave a PowerPoint presentation outlining the benefits of
Practical Housing, a concept created in Atlanta in 1990 to make all new houses
"visitable" by everyone, with or without disabilities. Practical Housing for All is a
voluntary program, based on incentives for homebuilders to include simple
solutions to access barriers in the original design and construction of single-family
homes. Practical Housing for All is asking for the Affordable Housing Board's
support for a proposed ordinance, a copy of which was distributed to the Board, to
encourage construction of such homes in Fort Collins. Lou Stitzel pointed out that
on the state level, any project using Housing Trust funds must have general
accessibility. Felix said the ordinance would cover projects not receiving
government funding, and that PHA was looking for general support from the Board
and others. Jon expressed concern that the copy of the ordinance distributed to the
Board was too vague on the cost of the incentives as well as the actual incentives
proposed.
Isabel asked Felix to e-mail any additional details to Ken, and Board
members to read the ordinance and comment on it at the next meeting.
I-25 Subarea Plan
Ken presented a brief update on the I-25 Subarea Plan, which is scheduled to go
before Council at its August study session. At the current housing density of two
dwellings per acre, affordable housing does not seem to be a viable option. Ken
pointed out that the City could encourage higher densities with affordable housing
density bonuses.
During discussion, Denise pointed out that infrastructure and services have to plan
for the expected density. He suggested the Board make a statement at next
month's meeting; in the meantime, Ken will meet with Kay, Jon and Denise as the
Land Use Subcommittee to discuss the impact of affordable housing in the I-25
Subarea.
Nexus Study
Maurice announced that on June 28, five min-taskforces will be taking community
input on the study from representatives of commercial interests; residential
construction; environmental groups; industry organizations, and nonprofits and
citizen groups. Significant comments will be included in the final report that goes to
Council at its July 23 study session. He invited members of the Board to attend the
meetings, which are designed to get more eyes to look at the study as well as make
various groups aware of it and air any concerns that may arise. Maurice said he
would provide the Board with a copy of the memo on the recommendations
generated by the small -group sessions.
Affordable Housing Board
June 6, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 5
Status of AHB Recommendations
Maurice distributed a memo updating the status of Affordable Housing Board
recommendations.
Update/Reports on Subcommittee Efforts
None.
Liaison Reports
None.
Other Business
E-mail Reminder
Ken reminded Board members that any e-mail communication on Board business is
part of the public record, even if it does not go through the City's e-mail system.
Street Standards
For informational purposes, Ken distributed a copy of proposed revisions to Larimer
County urban area street standards. Although it may have little impact on
affordable housing, Ken requested any comments be sent to him to be forwarded to
the Engineering Department.
Down -Payment Assistance Funds
Ken also announced that all the funds for down -payment assistance have been
distributed for this year. Council has approved $300,000 of CDBG funds for down -
payment assistance; however, those funds must be matched and will not be
available until October. There is an estimated current demand for 50-60 grants,
and staff is looking at various options to cover as many of those as possible in the
interim.
Poster Distribution
Ken announced that the second version of the Affordable Housing poster is now
available for distribution, and asked for volunteers to help distribute it.
Next meeting
Ken will coordinate rescheduling the next meeting to avoid conflict with the July 4
holiday.
On a motion by Denise Rogers and seconded by Joe Hebert, meeting adjourned
6:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by
Kate Jeracki
June 18, 2002