HomeMy WebLinkAboutTransportation Board - Minutes - 05/15/2002REGULAR MEETING MINUTES of the
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
May 15, 2002
5:45 p.m.
City of Fort Collins - 215 N. Mason Street
Community Room
FOR REFERENCE:
CHAIR: Christophe Ricord............................472.8769
VICE CHAIR: Bruce Henderson..............................282.1319
STAFF LIAISON: Don Bachman....................................224.6049
ADMIN SUPPORT: Cynthia Scott....................................224.6058
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
Dan Gould
Bruce Henderson
Tim Johnson
Tom Kramer
Brad Miller
Christophe Ricord
Heather Trantham
CITY STAFF IN ATTENDANCE:
Don Bachman
John Daggett
Gary Diede
Randy Hensley
Mike Herzig
Mark Jackson
GUESTS IN ATTENDANCE:
George Walton
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Ricord called the meeting to order at 5:50 p.m.
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT:
Neil Grigg
Edward Jakubauskas
Ray Moe
Brent Thordarson
CITY STAFF CONT.
Cam McNair
Ron Phillips
Kathleen Reavis
Tom Reiff
Cynthia Scott
Peter Wray
Transportation Board
APPROVED Regular Meeting Minutes
May15,2002 Page 2
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There was a motion and a second to approve the April 2002 Transportation Board
minutes as presented. Discussion:
Johnson stated that on page 4, second line under the comments he made, the line
should read as follows: "the number of rides from that have been shifted from
Trans ort to DAR?"
- Chair Ricord stated that on Page 7, where his comments are, the word "cost" needs to
be inserted between the and estimate.
- Chair Ricord also asked that the minutes reflect that he made a statement during the
roundabout discussion that staff needs to continue to look at ways to make
roundabouts more bicycle and pedestrian friendly.
The above stated amendments were approved by the board and the motion carried
by a unanimous vote.
4. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT
None.
5. MASON STREET TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR UPDATE - K. Reavis
Ms. Reavis stated that as project manager, she would be coming to the board on a regular
basis to report updates instead of Hensley.
She stated that three staff members traveled to Eugene, Oregon last month. They are
putting in a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System that is very comparable to the type of system
that is being looked at for the Mason Street Transportation Corridor (MSTC) project. It
was an incredibly valuable experience to go and talk to them firsthand, see the corridor,
learn all the issues they had gone through including the details on funding, traffic issues,
university issues, etc that staff will be facing with the MSTC project. She encouraged
members to check out their web site: Lane Transit District.
Staff also attended a workshop that was put on by the Federal Transit Administration
about financial planning for New Starts projects. Again, it was incredibly helpful to learn
what other communities are going through and learn from their experiences.
Troy Jones has been working on the land use component to go along with the Mason Street
work from the transportation side and he is making progress on putting together a Scope
of Work.
Transportation Board
APPROVED Regular Meeting Minutes
May15,2002
Page 3
6. DOWNTOWN STRATEGIC PLAN (DSP) - R. Hensley
Hensley reminded the board that the DSP is a plan to look at several critical issues. Each
member received a copy of the original proposal to explain what the DSP is designed to
accomplish and what it will look at.
Hensley stated that he needs a volunteer or two from the Board to serve on the Citizen
Advisory Group. He would like to have a Transportation Board member as the Plan
includes several critical transportation elements. Examples of those are an update to the
Downtown Parking Plan, a Truck and Freight Delivery and Mobility Study, and a general
Traffic Circulation Study.
It was further explained that there would be two major groups as part of this effort. The
Citizen Advisory Group as already mentioned. These will be citizens at large, people that
have an interest in the downtown and bring some sort of perspective or expertise to the
group, which everyone here does as part of the Transportation Board. There will also be
Technical Advisory Committee, which will be made up of people who are more day-to-day
data driven, operationally oriented types. Ideally, the person from the Board that is on
the Citizen Advisory Group will bring a multi -modal transportation perspective to this
group. Lacking somebody that can do that, he stated that the group would like two Board
members; one that would bring a general transportation perspective and another person
to bring the multi -modal perspective. Either way, staff would like to have at least one
person and perhaps a back-up as no one person will be able to attend all the meetings.
The Citizen Advisory Group will be meeting about once every six weeks. There is talk
about having this meeting early in the morning, perhaps as early as 7:30 a.m. The length
of the project is 12-14 months. The participant would then report to the board. John
Daggett is the project manager on the transportation side of this.
He then asked for volunteers. After a brief discussion, it was agreed that since several
Board members were absent, it would be best for Hensley to return next month and ask
the question.
7. ACTION ITEM
a) STREET STANDARDS, REVISION - M. Herzig
Herzig stated that he came before the board about a year and a half ago. At that time he
presented the Urban Area Street Standards originally going to Council for adoption.
The Standards were adopted by Council in January 2001 and went into effect on March 1,
2001. The Standards are the adopted technical street design and construction standards
for the cities of Fort Collins, and the Larimer County Growth Management Areas for Fort
Collins and Loveland.
Within about six months, staff started accumulating revisions and started meeting
formally about eight months ago to start doing a revision process for the document. For
the revision process, there was a committee that put out a couple of newsletters that
were mailed to the development community that included an Internet address so people.
The entire document is on the Larimer County web site and there is a link on the City
Engineering page to that web site.
Transportation Board
APPROVED Regular Meeting Minutes
May15, 2002
Page 4
The revision process will be an ongoing process as it is like the Land Use Codes that
require changes on a continuing basis in order to keep up with policy changes and
different things like that.
He stated that he asking for the Board's support and recommendation to Council to adopt
revision No. 1 which actually contains several revisions listed as a in the Revision Summary
that was sent to the board in their packets. Some of the changes were meant to improve
the document itself such as transferring it into a stable Word document and expanding the
Table of Contents making it easier to find elements of the Standards more easily.
Johnson asked Trantham to share her thoughts as she was part of the team and reported
to the board on a regular basis. Trantham said that the most positive part of this effort is
having the same or similar street standards for Fort Collins and Loveland and the area in
between.
Trantham moved to recommend that Council approve the Lorimer County Urban
Street Standards Revision No. 1. There was a second by Kramer. The motion carried
unanimously.
8. DISCUSSION ITEMS
a) E. MULBERRY CORRIDOR PLAN UPDATE - P. Wray and T. Reiff
Wray stated that staff and the consultant technical committee (TAC) is seeking input and
comments for the draft Principals and Policies and the preferred Framework Plan relating
to transportation issues from the Transportation Board.
As listed in the memo that was included in the board's packets, there are two questions
that the TAC is interested in:
a) Are the principals and policies statements relating to transportation consistent
with City Plan?
b) Do the statements relating to transportation and land use cover all of the
issues within the study area?
Wray and Reiff explained the Framework plan, Framework Plan Overlay, Proposed Street
Network, Proposed Bikeway Network, and Proposed Transit Routes in detail using colored
maps.
The tentative schedule for joint adoption from the City and the County is mid to late
August. Staff would like this board to forward a recommendation in July. Wray stated
that staff would more than likely have a draft Plan ready to show the Board at their June
meeting.
Chair Ricord asked the board if anyone wanted to respond to the two questions posed
earlier. He acknowledged that there is a lot of information to digest.
Transportation Board
APPROVED Regular Meeting Minutes
May15, 2002
Page 5
Johnson inquired about what the points of contention have been in the public process
with this plan. Wray stated that one of the main concerns is about the recommendations
for access management. Two other big areas that have been dealt with in the process is
the Cooper Slew area/Weiker Drive and logistics of the short and long-term scenarios with
the airport area.
The board thanked staff for their informative presentation.
b) CSU STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE - J. Daggett
Daggett gave a Power Point presentation on the Strategic Plan and hard copies of
the presentation were given to the members.
Highlights of the presentation included:
• How CSU compares citing the findings of the University Transportation
Survey. (Twenty-three universities nationwide participated in the
survey.)
• Auto analysis:
Traffic Volumes
Laurel Street
Parking Analysis
- Five Parking Alternatives
Peripheral Et Neighborhood Parking
• Bike/Ped Analysis
On Campus Bicycle/Ped Facilities
System Connectivity
City Systems - Improvements
• Transit Analysis
Option 1: Transfort Plan - Full Implementation
Option 2: Campus 8 Parking Circulators
• Land Use Analysis
Land Use - CSU Vicinity
Land Use in Fort Collins/around CSU
Housing Factors to Students and Housing Locations
Daggett stated that the CSU STP is considering three recommendations:
1. Establish a University Planning District
2. Explore the feasibility of developing University Villages in the
residential areas adjacent tot he CSU main campus
3. Increase residential density on and adjacent to the University's main
campus
Daggett described the numerous outcomes of the Null Alternative, then went over
the Next Steps, which are:
1. CSU Steering Committee - May 10th - Strategy Development
.-.
Transportation Board
APPROVED Regular Meeting Minutes
May15,2002
Page 6
2. Follow-up and Development of Three Transportation Alternative
Scenarios
3. City Transportation Board - June
4. City Council - July
5. State Board of Agriculture - August
There were some questions from the board, mostly clarification type questions.
The board thanked Daggett and is expecting another update next month.
c) TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL FUNDING - D. Bachman
Bachman stated that last month he was here with the Council long term
Transportation capital sub -committee and their request for a notion of how money
we should be looking for to solve this transportation problem. The Transportation
Boards' recommendation was somewhere between 40-50% because less is not
enough to solve all the mobility problems with. Bachman stated that a Power
Point presentation was given to the full Council by the committee that contained
that recommendation in it. He added that tonight there is no request for
additional input from the committee. However, the Board's finance committee
met a couple of weeks ago, went through this, had a good discussion on this and
may want to toss around some ideas.
Bachman presented the same information on funding via Power Point that was
contained in the board's packets and he stated that this is not new information.
Generally speaking, Council seemed to think that it was a fairly balanced
approach. The next steps on this are that surveys are being conducted and we
should have results of the survey just in time for the next council SS on June 11.
Another thing going on right now is the ballot is being crafted. There are a couple
schools of thought on the language.
Our marketing people are putting together suitable for public consumption
marketing package on this, but we don't have anything that we can give you on
this yet.
After a 10-minute discussion, the board concluded with an agreement to send a
letter to Council with their thoughts. Henderson made a motion using similar
wording as the last time: the Transportation Board believes that Fort Collins is too
congested now and with so much growth, it will only worse unless we specify a funding
percentage that is sufficiently higher than 25% so we can make progress. While we think the
Council committee has done a great job in preparing the current proposal, we feel that the
funding level of 37.5% is too low and we would like to propose that we raise the Excise tax
percentage to 201o, which yields an overall funding percentage of 45% and further that the
Council would investigate how to bind the Transportation Maintenance Fee of...
1
.-,
Transportation Board
APPROVED Regular Meeting Minutes
May15,2002
Page 7
Johnson intervened and asked if he could offer the following: how to link the
General Fund money displaced by the Transportation Maintenance Fee to
Transportation Capital.
Miller suggested that the wording for this recommendation start with it's own
beginning and could use a little streamlining. For clarification, the motion was
reread by Miller:
The Transportation Board believes that the funding level of 37.5% is too low and
recommends increasing the Excise tax to 2%, which yields an overall funding percentage
of 45% and further that the Council would investigate how to link the General Fund
money displaced by the Transportation Maintenance Fee to Transportation Capital. The
streamlined wording was approved by Henderson. There was a second by Johnson. The
motion carried by a majority vote, 6 —1. The dissenter stated that he is in agreement
with the Council Finance Committee's recommendation and is certainly not
opposed to an Excise tax.
9. REPORTS
a) BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Johnson: Citizen Planners/COPirQ. I was invited to give a discussion to Citizen
Planners and CoPirg on financing. It was an interesting discussion with
lots of good questions.
Don had Diane make a transparency package so that if anyone else has
the opportunity to give a talk like that, the package would be available.
b) STAFF REPORTS
Jackson: Transportation Master Plan. The RFPs have been released for the last 4-
5 weeks and just last week we conducted interviews. The selected
team was PBSJ.
City Plan. Three different teams were interviewed today and two of
those are very strong. Next month I'll be able to report more.
McNair: Construction. Many construction projects will be started after school is
out, so be prepared for cone zones to pop up.
Transportation Board
APPROVED Regular Meeting Minutes
May15,2002
Bachman: Next Agenda:
• CSU Strategic Plan
• E. Mulberry Corridor Plan
• Downtown Strategic Plan
• Transportation Master Plan Update
• Mason Street Transportation Corridor Update
• Transportation Capital
• Pavement Management (August ?)
10. OTHER BUSINESS
None
11. ADJOURN
Chair Ricord adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cynthia Scott
Executive Administrative Assistant
Page 8