HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission - MINUTES - 07/17/2025Planning & Zoning Commission
REGULAR MEETING
July 17, 2025 – 6:00 PM
Council Chambers, City Hall 300 Laporte Ave
Also via Zoom
CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL
a. Board Members Present – Adam Sass (Chair), Russell Connelly (Vice Chair), York, Kent Bruxvoort,
Shirley Peel, Ted Shepard, Julie Stackhouse (arrived late)
b. Board Members Absent – None
c.Staff Members Present – Frickey, Kidwell, Myler, Mapes, Smith, Mellinger, Jarvis
d. Guest(s) – Louis Pintkowski
AGENDA REVIEW
Clay Frickey, Planning Manager, provided a review of the agenda.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Louis Pintkowski commented on the potential of a Housing Catalyst project being built on the Remington
Street parking lot. He stated the parking lot was donated to the City for use as a parking lot in perpetuity
and questioned whether there is any opportunity for members of the public to provide input on the
potential of the project.
CONSENT AGENDA
1.CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF MAY 15, 2025
The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the May 15, 2025, meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Commissioner York made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bruxvoort, to approve the
Consent Agenda. Yeas: Connelly, Shepard, York, Bruxvoort, Peel, and Sass. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DISCUSSION AGENDA
2.NATURAL AREAS STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK
This is a request for a recommendation to City Council regarding
adoption of the Natural Areas Strategic Framework as a component
of City Plan. The Framework updates the City’s 2014 Natural Areas
Master Plan and serves as a systemwide guide for the planning
and management of the Natural Areas Department (NAD) over the
coming decade. Rooted in ballot language, extensive community
engagement, and broader City policies, the Framework articulates
an updated vision, set of values, and strategic goals for the
Department. It provides the foundation for action-oriented planning
STAFF: Kelly Smith, Senior Environmental Planner, Natural Areas, and
Julia Feder, Conservation & Stewardship Manager
Staff Presentation
Kelly Smith, Senior Environmental Planner, stated that the Natural Areas Strategic Framework is the
culmination of 18 months of engagement and it incorporates the ballot language from the two measures
that support Natural Areas financially. Additionally, it integrates the Natural Areas mission and City’s
mission, vision, values, and plans. Smith stated the Framework is designed to serve as a structure for all
other planning initiatives at more of a land use and land management scale and includes a vision, values,
and goals that serve as the foundation for the management zone updates.
Smith discussed Conservation and Stewardship Planning and outlined the six geographic zones into
which all Natural Areas are divided: Montane, Cache la Poudre, Mountains to Plains, Foothills, Urban,
and Fossil Creek, and noted they are each updated on a regular basis. She stated that the Framework
Plan will be forward looking, illustrate habitat and community needs, be data and community informed,
and support a foundation for ongoing Natural Areas planning efforts through the vision, values, and goals
statements.
Smith noted Council, on its Consent Agenda, unanimously adopted the Framework Plan, which is a
component of City Plan, on First Reading two days ago and Second Reading is scheduled for August
19th.
Public Comment
None.
Commission Discussion
Commissioner Shepard asked if the Framework Plan seeks to maintain, decrease, or increase the
existing level of service for Natural Areas trails. Smith replied that it maintains and potentially increases
the existing level of service.
Commissioner Shepard asked if some of the maintenance includes converting agricultural pastureland to
more natural plantings. Smith replied that Natural Areas work does include that, and those areas are
identified and prioritized through management zone updates. She noted those conversions take several
years and there is currently a backlog of those projects.
Commissioner Shepard noted Council unanimously adopted the Framework on First Reading on its
Consent Agenda which speaks to the public support of the Natural Areas mission, values, and goals. He
commended the Natural Areas program as being one of the City’s crown jewels and stated he would
support the Strategic Framework.
Chair Sass concurred and thanked Natural Areas staff for their efforts.
Commissioner Bruxvoort made a motion, seconded by Commissioner York, that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend that City Council adopt the Natural Areas Strategic Framework
as a component of City Plan, finding that the Strategic Framework is a needed update of the 2014
Natural Areas Master Plan that was adopted as a component of City Plan, and the Strategic
Framework will promote the public welfare and is consistent with the vision, goals, principles,
and policies of City Plan and its adopted components. This decision is based upon the agenda
materials, information presented during the work session and this hearing, and Commission
discussion. The Commission adopts the information, analysis, findings of fact, and conclusions
regarding adopting the Natural Areas Strategic Framework as a component of City Plan contained
in the staff report included in the agenda materials for this hearing. Yeas: York, Bruxvoort,
Connelly, Peel, Shepard, and Sass. Nays: none.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
(**Secretary’s Note: Commissioner Stackhouse arrived at this point in the meeting.)
3. AXIS INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY SPAR SPA250002
DESCRIPTION: This is a Site Plan Advisory Review (SPAR) request to change the
use and occupancy of the existing 42,595 sq. ft. building at 3939
Automation Way (parcel #8731109001) to AXIS International
Academy, which includes complete demolition and renovation of all
interior spaces. The site is located in the Employment (E) zone
district and is subject to a Site Plan Advisory Review (SPAR)
review and will go to the Planning and Zoning Commission for
STAFF:
Clark Mapes, City Planner
PROPERTY
OWNER:
Jenny Whitaker
2700 S. Lemay Ave.
Fort Collins CO 80525
APPLICANT:
3318 Tranquility Way
Berthoud, CO 80513
Staff Overview
Clark Mapes, City Planner, stated this item relates to an existing charter school moving to an existing
building on Automation Way, near Timberline and Horsetooth, in the Collindale Business Park. He stated
the only issue of concern for staff was related to morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up traffic.
Mapes noted that these types of reviews are governed by State Statutes and requirements are general
and brief and relate to location, character, and extent. He noted that the Site Plan Advisory Review
(SPAR) Statute requirements are incorporated into the Land Use Code. He went on to note that the site
is within the Mixed Employment District place type which includes private schools as a principal land use.
Mapes noted that charter schools do not have enrollment areas as do public schools; therefore, they
draw traffic from a larger region. He also noted that there have been a few recent charter schools that
have located in non-residential areas. He stated staff is recommending the Commission support the
SPAR without comments.
Mapes showed a map of the site indicating its two access points.
Applicant Presentation
Jenny Whitaker, Axis International Academy Head of School and Co-Founder, discussed the founding of
Axis and its commitment to language immersion and global education. She noted that Axis is the only
school in Fort Collins offering Mandarin and French language programs and the school serves preschool
through 6th grade students. She also commented on the benefits of the Automation Way site and stated
the school plans for full interior renovation and many site upgrades, including landscaping, fencing, and
lighting.
Whitaker outlined the traffic plan and noted that Axis operates a highly efficient drive line system that has
been proven effective at two previous campuses. She noted that the entire morning drop off is typically
completed prior to most area businesses opening. Additionally, she noted that Axis has been working
with Triple Crown Sports to ensure complimentary schedules and to create shared use parking
agreements. She also commented on the possibility of future parking and drive expansion, which would
require additional review.
Staff Analysis
Mapes reiterated the parking and drive expansion would be a future amendment with additional review.
Commission Questions
Commissioner York asked if additional information has been received from Triple Crown Sports. Mapes
replied that Triple Crown Sports will not be operating on the school property in the way it has in the past
during tournaments. Whitaker clarified the school has confirmed the timing of employee arrivals and
departures for Triple Crown and noted all of their school year programming starts at 4:00 PM after Axis
students have departed. Additionally, she noted that Triple Crown will not be using the baseball field on
the school property while school is in session.
Commissioner York noted that the traffic pattern shows traffic coming from the north and asked if those
coming from the south will still be expected to go to Horsetooth and come back from the north or if they
will be coming from the south and somehow entering the queue. Additionally, he asked about the
expectations for drivers wanting to leave the property and go north. Whitaker replied that part of Axis’
program is training families how to use the drive line and stated families will enter Automation Way from
Horsetooth and head southbound and they must also exit the campus heading southbound. She stated
her team is working with the City to consider extending the stop light timing at Caribou during pick up and
drop off hours.
Commissioner York asked if changing the timing at the Caribou light would be a possibility. Shawn
Mellinger from Traffic replied that the City is not currently planning on retiming the signals and noted the
surrounding intersections were not analyzed as part of this proposal, though it could be further
considered in the future.
Commissioner Bruxvoort asked if there is any existing safety data for the Caribou and Timberline
intersection. Shawn replied that information exists for most intersections, though it was not specifically
considered for this project.
Mapes noted that the traffic memo acknowledges that there is very little student walking and bicycling to
charter schools, which is expected to be the case with this school, particularly given the Horsetooth and
Timberline intersection not being conducive to pedestrian or bike use by elementary aged students.
Commissioner York noted that the intersection is a heavily used bicycle and pedestrian corridor for the
community and Fort Collins High School students.
Commissioner Stackhouse requested an additional review of the SPAR criteria to help explain why traffic
studies are not included. Clay Frickey, Planning Manager, outlined the location, character, and extent
criteria. Shawn noted that the SPAR scope involves more of the operational queuing locations, site
access, and directly adjacent arterials.
Commissioner Stackhouse asked if staff would review any expected safety concerns. Shawn replied in
the affirmative.
Commissioner Shepard noted that the City has the ability to adjust signal timing based on observed
conditions. Shawn confirmed that is the case but noted that it is a large process involving signal timing
across the entire corridor. Additionally, he noted that the increase in the number of trips resulting from
the school use should not proportionally decrease the level of service at the intersections that would
warrant a signal timing change along either the Timberline or Horsetooth corridors.
Commissioner Shepard asked if there have been any conversations about filling the street tree gaps.
Mapes replied that was not considered as part of the location, character, and extent review. He noted
there is existing landscaping and irrigation; therefore, some additional trees could be added. However,
he noted a landscape plan was not required.
Whitaker noted that Axis received a grant from the State to fund this project and stated a landscape
architect has been secured to form a plan to improve the site.
Chair Sass asked if the school is a State charter. Whitaker replied in the affirmative.
Public Comment
Mapes noted that a letter of opposition was included in the Commission’s packet which argued the
employment place type should not be allowed to lose its focus on business and industrial park uses by
allowing charter schools. He noted that the site’s designation is mixed employment which allows a
number of uses other than just business park and employment related uses.
Commissioner Stackhouse noted that the letter also included comments on increased safety risks and
traffic. Mapes noted that the area does not have dangerous industrial uses and stated staff did not see
any safety concerns as being relevant to changing its recommendation.
Commissioner Stackhouse noted that the letter contained comments about inadequate pedestrian
infrastructure and emergency response logistics. Mapes stated that the pedestrian framework in the area
is intact and noted emergency services can access the site. He also noted Poudre Fire Authority had no
comments or issues regarding the proposal.
Commission Discussion
Commissioner Bruxvoort stated that he has observed that Automation Way is a corridor, primarily for
bicycle traffic, for people who live south and east of the site begin to merge northward toward the Power
Trail. He noted that the impact of the location, character, and extent of the proposed project on the
neighborhood can also be considered. He suggested the Commission consider making a comment that
the site’s potential impact on traffic and safety conditions at the intersection of Caribou and Timberline be
further evaluated.
Chair Sass stated that he could support that comment and noted adjustments could be made as
necessary after examining any changes to level of service after the school opens.
Commissioner York suggested also including the Automation and Horsetooth intersection noting part of
his concern about all traffic coming from the north is that that intersection is non-signalized.
Commissioner Peel asked what recourse the City would have if issues arise once the school is in place.
Frickey replied the Commission is a recommending body, not a decision-making body for a SPAR.
Assistant City Attorney Jarvis stated the Commission will be providing a recommendation to the Axis
board and that can include a request for a response. She also noted that there would be another SPAR
should the school expand or add parking.
Commissioners discussed whether the more appropriate course of action would be to make a comment
to the Axis board or to ask staff to continue to look at the level of service in the area.
Commissioner Stackhouse noted that there are likely existing issues in the area; therefore, what is being
assessed is the incremental impact of the school, and it seems there is not enough evidence of
incremental safety concerns at this point per staff’s comments.
Chair Sass asked about the estimated increase in the number of vehicles from the previous use to the
school use. Shawn replied that the previous use had a 200-300 vehicle estimate throughout the day and
the school has a 550 vehicle estimate for both morning and afternoon traffic.
Commissioner York expressed concern about the school use adding traffic to the area at the peak time
when other types of traffic are already there.
Commissioner Peel asked how the City would handle negative traffic impacts once the school opens.
Shawn replied that is when staff would look at signal timing to help mitigate the traffic and further work
with the school on its traffic flow.
Commissioner York suggested a staggered start at the school could help alleviate and mitigate negative
impacts on traffic and bike and pedestrian safety.
Chair Sass asked how often Traffic Operations reviews intersections for performance. Shawn replied
that he would need to find that information.
Chair Sass stated he does not believe the additional traffic will cause a substantive impact to the two
intersections mentioned.
Commissioner York commented on the importance of making the area as safe as possible for all users
who are currently in the corridor with this use coming in. He also noted the only signalized intersection in
the area is for egress only.
Commissioner Bruxvoort suggested the Commission make the comment to extend the scope of the traffic
memo to evaluate the two intersections that would potentially be most impacted by the additional traffic,
not because it opposes the project, but because more data makes for better projects.
Chair Sass concurred and asked if there is a bike lane along Automation Way. Commissioner York
replied in the negative and suggested the proposed traffic pattern could cause confusion for cyclists and
drivers.
Commissioner Bruxvoort restated his suggested comment: the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends that the site’s potential impact on traffic conditions at the intersections of Caribou and
Timberline and Automation Way and Horsetooth be further evaluated and monitored for remedy as
necessary. He stated greater specificity could be added by including language such as ‘evaluated
through expanding the scope of the traffic memo’ and/or ‘that staff monitor conditions post-operations for
remedy as necessary.’
Commissioner York stated he does not have a specific recommendation for solving the Automation Way
issue; however, there are options that could be considered such as coning off the drive aisle or placing
signage indicating cyclists should use the left lane during the drop off and pick up times.
Chair Sass concurred with Commissioner York and stated he would have hoped the traffic engineers
would have recommended school zone signs or speed humps to help mitigate concerns. He also
suggested the Commission’s concerns should be directed at City traffic staff.
Commissioner Peel asked if it would be feasible for the school to institute staggered drop-off times.
Whitaker replied in the affirmative and noted the traffic memo showed a low impact. She also noted the
school successfully operated at Drake and Lemay and Horsetooth and Taft Hill. She stated the school is
well accustomed to being very thoughtful about its traffic patterns and stated staggering the times would
be considered if problems were noticed.
Commissioner Peel asked if the City usually installs speed bumps around charter schools. Shawn
replied that it is his understanding that it does not.
Commissioner Shepard stated a work session with Traffic Operations addressing practical mitigation
measures for all schools could be beneficial.
Chair Sass concurred there needs to be safe human-powered travel up and down Automation Way and
stated he could support a comment suggesting the school utilize additional staff members to direct traffic.
He stated that he does not believe the applicant should be required to do a traffic study at some point in
the future.
Commissioner Stackhouse opposed making any comments to the Axis board but supported City staff
monitoring the situation. She stated that the numbers do not warrant a requirement that would add
expense.
Commissioner Peel questioned whether it is fair to put the burden on the City if there is a problem in the
future.
Commissioner Stackhouse noted that signal timing would fall under the City’s purview. Shawn stated
that the City sometimes requires developments to provide a proportional share of the cost of improving
pedestrian facilities.
Chair Sass asked if the Commission would review another SPAR if the school modifies the site to add a
drive loop and parking lot. Assistant City Attorney Jarvis replied that this item is a complete SPAR for
what is being contemplated, and the additional future plans would likely require another review by the
Commission.
Chair Sass asked if the City could bar the school from having a queuing lane on Automation Way should
it seem that is an issue in the future. Frickey replied that the City has in the past required additional on-
site queuing if public safety issues related to development are identified.
Mapes clarified the queuing would happen in what is now on-street parking and there would be signage
and management by the school to reserve that area for queuing. He stated that he does not believe the
plan would change the roadway into a two-lane scenario. Commissioner York stated the use of the lanes
changes because the on-street parking does not involve moving vehicles.
Commissioner Shepard commented on the drop off and pick up situation at St. Joe’s along Howes Street.
Commissioner Peel asked if the Commission could make a recommendation that the school look at the
issue as it finalizes design. Chair Sass expressed support for placing an emphasis on the issue related
to queuing on Automation Way as part of the design.
Commissioner York stated he would accept that as long as the safety concerns that would be created in
that section between the north ingress and the egress from the parking lot are addressed.
Commissioner Bruxvoort also supported that type of recommendation.
Mapes noted Traffic Operations staff made recommendations to the school for a traffic plan and the
resulting operational plan included the majority of those recommendations, which are outlined in the staff
report.
Commissioner Stackhouse suggested including language such as ‘the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends that the school gives special attention over time to traffic issues raised through the drop off
and pick up of students as appropriate for safety and efficiency.’
Chair Sass suggested adding human-powered and motor vehicle traffic. He also commented on the fact
that the school wants to make this location its home and will want it to be as safe and aesthetically
pleasing as possible.
Commissioner Stackhouse made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Peel, that the Planning
and Zoning Commission direct staff to provide the review comments contained in the staff report
regarding Site Plan Advisory Review SPA250002 to the Axis International Academy board of
directors with a request for a response. The Planning and Zoning Commission specifically
recommends that the Axis International Academy board of directors give special attention over
time to pedestrian, human-powered, and motor vehicle traffic issues raised through the drop off
and pick up of students as appropriate for safety and efficiency. In consideration of the review
comments to be provided to the board, the Commission finds that the location, character, and
extent of the proposed development plan is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and
the proposed development mitigates its functional and visual impacts to streets, sidewalks,
utilities, lighting, screening, and noise, to the extent reasonably feasible. This decision is based
upon the agenda materials, information presented during the work session and this hearing, and
Commission discussion. The Commission adopts the information, analysis, findings of fact, and
conclusions regarding Site Plan Advisory Review SPA250002 contained in the staff report
included in the agenda materials for this hearing. Yeas: Stackhouse, Peel, York, Connelly,
Shepard, Bruxvoort, and Sass. Nays: none.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
OTHER BUSINESS
Commissioner Shepard acknowledged the speaker who commented on the Remington parking lot
and advised him to contact his Council representative.
ADJOURNMENT
a. Chair Sass moved to adjourn the P&Z Commission hearing. The meeting was
adjourned at 8:03 PM.
Minutes respectfully submitted by Krista Kidwell
Minutes approved by the Chair and a vote of the Commission on 9/18/25