HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/10/2025 - Human Services and Housing Funding Board - AGENDA - Regular MeetingHUMAN SERVICES & HOUSING FUNDING BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
September 10, 2025 – 5:30 pm – 7:30 pm
Participation for this Human Services & Housing Funding Board Meeting will be in-person only at the
location identified above. Remote or online viewing/participation will not be available.
Any document or presentation a member of the public wishes to provide to the Human Services & Housing
for its consideration must be emailed to amolzer@fcgov.com at least 24 hours before the meeting.
ttend the meeting are encouraged to participate by emailing general
amolzer@fcgov.com, and send at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
Fort Collins Senior Center – 1200 Raintree Drive, Fort Collins – Foxtail 1 Room
1. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
2. AGENDA REVIEW
3. INTRODUCTIONS WITH NEW BOARD MEMBERS
4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (3 MINUTES PER INDIVIDUAL)
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 12, 2025 & May 14, 2025 Regular Meetings
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. 2025-2026 Officers Nominations – Vote in October
b. Affordable Housing Board Feedback & Process Improvements for 2026
c. Introduce Learning Series 2025-2026 – Affordable Housing
d. FY24 Outcomes Reporting (Oct.2024-Mar.2025)
8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
9. STAFF REPORTS
10. OTHER BUSINESS (Board member concerns, Announcements)
a. Grantee Client Story
11. NEXT MEETING *Locations and times subject to change – please check next meeting agenda*
a. Wednesday, October 8, 2025 | 5:30pm | Location: Fort Collins Senior Center
12. ADJOURNMENT
03/12/2025– MINUTES
HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING FUNDING BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, March 12, 2025 – 5:30 PM
In-Person at 222 Laporte Avenue, Colorado River Conference Room and online via
TEAMS Video Call.
1. CALL TO ORDER: 5:37 PM
2. ROLL CALL
• Board Members Present –
• Erma Woodfin, Chair
• Lori Warren, Vice Chair
• Olga Duvall
• Michaela Ruppert
• Chris Coy
• Christine Koepnick
• Mike Kulisheck
• Board Members Excused –
• Jan Stallones
• Staff Members Present –
• Adam Molzer, Staff Liaison, Social Sustainability – City of Fort Collins
• Jessi Kauffmann, Social Sustainability – City of Fort Collins
• Beth Rosen – Social Sustainability – City of Fort Collins
• Sue Beck-Ferkiss – Social Sustainability - City of Fort Collins
• Vanessa Fenley - Social Sustainability – City of Fort Collins
• Guest(s) –
• Elizabeth Lok
• Liliana Carredo
• Bob Pawlikowski
3. AGENDA REVIEW – Adam Molzer reviewed the agenda. The Board accepted the
agenda without modification.
4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION –
• Liz Lok introduced herself and will be joining the HSHF Board in July, if
confirmed by Council in July
• Liliana Carredo introduced herself as a CSU graduate student
• Bob Pawlikowski is the Vice Chair of the Affordable Housing Board
03/12/2025– MINUTES
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – February 12, 2025 Regular Meeting
Lori Warren motioned to approve the January 12th, 2025 meeting minutes as
presented. Olga Duvall seconded. Approved 7-0.
6. LEARNING SERIES PRESENTATIONS
• Affordable Housing – Beth Rosen, City of Fort Collins – Grants Compliance & Policy
Manager
• Beth Rosen presented on the City’s approach to Housing. She shared the Draft
Consolidated Plan and Housing Strategic Plan as the two guiding documents for
housing work at the City.
• Currently at about 5% of all housing inventory as affordable housing, with the goal
being 10%.
• Estimated Funding – $2.3 million
• Community Development Block Grant Funds
• HOME Investment Partnership
• City of Fort Collins Affordable Housing Fund
• Homelessness Response – Vanessa Fenley, City of Fort Collins – Housing Manager
• Vanessa Fenley presented on the City’s approach to Homelessness. She
shared about the 2021 Housing Strategic plan and Regional Homelessness
Strategy Across Larimer County (coming soon, expected later in 2025).
• Goal is to make homelessness rare, short lived, non-recurring.
• She shared the City’s role – providing infrastructure through community
partners’ efforts to address priority human service issues. The City does not
provide direct services.
• The Homelessness Priority Platform highlights the three main priorities:
Sheltering, Supportive Services, and Prevention.
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – None.
8. NEW BUSINESS
• 2025 Grant Proposals
• Adam Molzer shared data on the 2025 funding proposals:
• 7 Affordable Housing Proposals equaling $4.36M with approx. $2.3M
anticipated.
• 50 Human Services Proposals equaling $1.63M/year with approx.
$770K/year anticipated
• 11 Homelessness Response Proposals equaling $455K/year with
$270K/year available.
• CDBG Public Service (homelessness focus) Proposals equaling $250K/year
with approx. $170K/year anticipated.
• Human Services Grant Funding Protocol
• Adam shared the Draft Funding Deliberation Structure & Protocol which aims to
efficiently and equitably determine funding for the Human Services and
Homelessness Response & Prevention applications.
Erma Woodfin motioned to approve the Funding Deliberation Structure and Protocol
Draft as presented. Olga Duvall seconded. Approved 7-0.
03/12/2025– MINUTES
• Affordable Housing Presentations and Q&A Process
• Adam Molzer shared upcoming events for the next steps of the competitive
process including pre-recorded videos from housing applicants as well as a
live Q&A.
9. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS – None.
• Chris Coy shared positive news regarding a family member’s last
chemotherapy session.
• Olga shared the upcoming event Founded in FoCO.
10. STAFF REPORTS – None.
• Beth Rosen shared that April is Fair Housing Month, the City will be sharing a
proclamation on April 1st in support of Fair Housing
• Sue Beck-Ferkiss shared the Affordable Housing Board will be passing along
their rankings of the Housing funding proposals in early April.
11. OTHER BUSINESS – None.
12. ADJOURNMENT
• Meeting was adjourned at 7:21 pm.
Minutes approved by the Chair and a vote of the Board on 03
HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING FUNDING BOARD
REGULAR MEETING DRAFT
Wednesday, May 14, 2025 – 5:30 PM
Online via TEAMS Video Call.
1. CALL TO ORDER: 5:31 PM
2. ROLL CALL
• Board Members Present –
• Erma Woodfin, Chair
• Lori Warren, Vice Chair
• Olga Duvall
• Michaela Ruppert
• Chris Coy
• Christine Koepnick
• Mike Kulisheck
• Board Members Excused –
• Jan Stallones
• Staff Members Present –
• Adam Molzer, Staff Liaison, Social Sustainability – City of Fort Collins
• Jessi Kauffmann, Social Sustainability – City of Fort Collins
• Beth Rosen, Social Sustainability – City of Fort Collins
• Sue Beck-Ferkiss, Social Sustainability - City of Fort Collins
• Guest(s) – None.
3. AGENDA REVIEW – Adam Molzer reviewed the agenda. The Board accepted the
agenda without modification.
4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION – None.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – April 29, 2025 & April 30, 2025 Special Meetings
Lori Warren motioned to approve the April 29, 2025 Human Services and Housing
Funding Board special meeting minutes as presented. Olga Duvall seconded.
Approved 7-0.
Lori Warren motioned to approve the April 30, 2025 Human Services and Housing
Funding Board special meeting minutes as presented. Olga Duvall seconded.
Approved 7-0.
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – None.
7. NEW BUSINESS
• Competitive Funding Process Update and 360-Review
• Adam Molzer presented data and review of the 2025 competitive
process. He captured questions, comments, and process
improvement ideas for 2026.
• Recess for Summer
• The Board will not be meeting during the summer months and
resume regular meetings on September 10, 2025.
Erma Woodfin motioned that the HSHF Board take a recess for June, July, and
August 2025. Olga Duvall seconded. Approved 7-0.
8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS – None.
9. STAFF REPORTS – None.
10. OTHER BUSINESS – None.
11. ADJOURNMENT
• Meeting was adjourned at 7:21 pm.
Minutes approved by the Chair and a vote of the Board on XX/XX/XX
June 9, 2025
From: Affordable Housing Board Chair Stefanie Berganini
To: City Council, via Sarah Kane
Re: 2025 Affordable Housing Funding Allocation Process
Per the Affordable Housing Board’s mission of advising Council on matters pertaining to
affordable housing issues of concern to the City, we believe it is essential that the process for
allocating funds to affordable housing projects be updated to ensure that funding prioritization
conforms with Council’s stated objectives outlined in the Housing Strategic Plan (HSP). Though
the Affordable Housing Board (AHB) and Human Services and Housing Funding Board (HSHFB)
often have a high degree of overlap in our ranking of affordable housing applicants, this year we
did not; this has given us the opportunity to reflect and provide suggestions about how this
process could be changed going forward to better capture the expertise of both boards.
We recommend the following changes be made to future cycles of the housing portion of the
City’s competitive funding process:
● Staff facilitate the development and adoption of a rubric aligned with the HSP and/or
HUD Consolidated Plan that is utilized by both boards as the basis for ranking funding
applications.
● Formalize more collaboration between the AHB and the HSHFB:
● Determine a weighting formula that formally includes both the AHB’s ranking of
applicants and the HSHFB’s rankings in determining the priority order of
applications. This would allow the AHB’s subject-matter expertise to be officially
included in the ranking of applicants while still preserving the HSHFB’s pur view
of assigning specific funding amounts.
● Allow the AHB and the HSHFB the option to conduct a second joint meeting - in
addition to our joint Q&A with funding applicants - to openly share and discuss
our thoughts on rankings, overall project evaluations, alignment with City
strategic objectives, and similar.
● When submitting their final funding recommendations to Council, the HSHFB also
provides detailed feedback as to how their ranking and funding allotments align with the
stated priorities in the HSP and/or HUD Consolidated Plan. This information should
also be made available to applicants upon request.
● Staff create a process whereby the AHB’s application rankings and summary comments
are included in Council’s agenda packet for the meeting relevant to the funding decision.
We have also attached the AHB’s rankings and summary comments of this year’s applicants for
your reference. These were provided to the HSHFB on April 7th, 2025.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Stefanie Berganini
Chair, Affordable Housing Board
April 7, 2025
From: Affordable Housing Board, Chair – Stefanie Berganini
To: Human Service and Housing Funding Board
Re: Ranking of Housing Applications in the 2025 Competitive Process
The Affordable Housing Board met on April 3, 2025, and discussed the 7 Housing
applications and ranked then in the following priority order:
1. HO 7 VOA - Switchgrass
2. HO 3 Housing Catalyst – Remington Parking Lot
3. HO 5 Loveland Housing Development Corp – Larimer Home Improvement
Program (LHIP)
4. HO 2 Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity – Harmony Cottages
5. HO 1 CARE Housing –Windtrail Rehab
6. HO 4 L’Arche Fort Collins – L’Arche Homes at Heartside Hill
7. HO 6 VOA Handyperson Program
Comments on ranking exercise:
• This was a very difficult round understanding that all applications were for
valuable projects and that the amount of funding available was not sufficient to
fund all applications.
• The Board prioritized projects bringing new housing units.
• The Board considered readiness to proceed as a factor.
• The Board noted that the Habitat application was the only home ownership
application this funding cycle.
• The Board prioritized LHIP as a response to emergency circumstances that put
housing at risk.
• The Board appreciates the L’Arche model because it serves a target population
(people experiencing disabilities) that is generally lacking in services and housing
options.
Note: Members of the Human Services and Housing Funding Board are always invited
to attend the Affordable Housing Board’s hybrid meetings (in-person or on Zoom) that
occur the first Thursday of each month at 4:00.
Social Sustainability Department
222 Laporte Ave.
PO Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522
970-221-6757
amolzer@fcgov.com
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 17, 2025
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
Through: Kelly DiMartino, City Manager
Tyler Marr, Deputy City Manager
Jacob Castillo, Chief Sustainability Officer
From: Adam Molzer, Human Services Program Manager
Subject: Context for Affordable Housing Funding Recommendations
BOTTOM LINE
The purpose of this memo is to provide additional context related to the 2025 funding
recommendations for affordable housing projects and programs that have been submitted by the
Human Services and Housing Funding Board (HSHFB), including specific interest in the
disparities in ranked order of the proposals between HSHFB and the Affordable Housing Board
(AHB), as well as HSHFB’s ranking of the Remington Parking Lot proposal from Housing Catalyst.
SUMMARY
The seven affordable housing funding proposals received in the 2025 process were all provided
with equal opportunity to compete for funding.
The ranking efforts conducted by HSHFB and AHB in April were done independently, with the
final recommendations submitted to Council by HSHFB, as directed by City Code. The boards
also met jointly on March 26. HSHFB received the AHB rankings/comments in early April and
discussed the AHB ranked list on April 9. Funding deliberations occurred April 29.
The rankings presented to Council should not be viewed as a lack of support for a project; rather,
they are the recommended order of projects to award the available funds cascading down until
expended. It is often that the lower ranked projects are not funded as a result of:
• inadequate funding to meet all requests ($4.3M requested, $2.5M available), and/or
• timing and readiness of the project to proceed
HSHFB members commented during the 2025 process that all projects submitted were good
projects, but there just wasn’t enough funding available.
Docusign Envelope ID: 2180EE88-DBE6-48AA-AA8B-02F9EC226F80
2
The table below outlines the respective factors influencing each boards’ rankings, recognizing that
each board is aware that City Council Priority 1 is to: Operationalize City resources to build and
preserve affordable housing.
AHB HSHFB
Materials & Interaction
with Applicants
• Full Application Materials
• Presentations from Applicants
• Q&A Session with Applicants
• Presentations from Applicants
• Q&A Session with Applicants
Exchanges with Other
Board
• Dialogue at March 26 Joint Meeting
• AHB Ranking and Comments Sent
to HSHFB for Non-Binding
• Discussed AHB Rankings at April 9
Regular Meeting
Guiding Factors
• HUD Consolidated Plan
• Vulnerable Populations: seniors,
disability, etc.
• Individual Assessment of Proposal
Merits
• HUD Consolidated Plan
• Maximizing Funds
• Leverage Provided from City Funds
• Vulnerable Populations: seniors,
mobile home parks, etc.
• Individual Assessment of Proposal
Prioritization
Staff Guidance Not Given
• New Units
• Preservation of Units
The boards’ rankings were more aligned with one another between 2022-2024 (following the
same processes), however; it can be reasonably inferred that in some years the two boards may
have different opinions of how they rank the affordable housing proposals.
Specific to Housing Catalyst’s proposal requesting $1.25M for development costs of the
Remington Parking Lot, AHB ranked the proposal #2 and HSHFB ranked the proposal #7. The
HSHFB discussions largely were focused on the timing of the project, since it had not yet
completed a conceptual review and its readiness to proceed was uncertain. One member
Docusign Envelope ID: 2180EE88-DBE6-48AA-AA8B-02F9EC226F80
3
brought up parking displacement concerns, and staff advised that those concerns should not be
a factor in this ranking.
The HSHFB took a strategic approach to optimizing the funds. After ranking their top 2 projects,
the board recognized that the remaining funds could first benefit the smaller dollar request
applications, with the final balance of funds cascading down to one new construction project. The
board chose the VOA Switchgrass new construction project to support with the remaining
funding balance, given its anticipated readiness to utilize the funds in 2026 and focus on senior
residents.
NEXT STEPS
• Process improvements for 2026 are currently being gathered and will be assessed
further in Q3-Q4. Examples may include:
o Additional joint meetings between HSHFB and AHB to prompt richer dialogue.
o Modifying the HSHFB ranking process to include more metric scoring.
o Standardizing the guiding factors influencing each board’s ranking process.
• Sustainability Service Area staff met with Housing Catalyst’s leadership in early June to
answer questions about the 2025 process, and will consider suggestions they offered for
process improvements.
• The staff liaison for HSHFB will meet with AHB at their August regular meeting to answer
questions, solicit feedback and clarify misunderstandings.
CC: Beth Yonce, Social Sustainability Director
Beth Rosen, HUD Compliance Manager
Vanessa Fenley, Housing Manager
Sue Beck-Ferkiss, Housing Policy Manager
Ted Hewitt, Assistant City Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: 2180EE88-DBE6-48AA-AA8B-02F9EC226F80
9/5/2025
1
Headline Copy Goes Here
Human Services Program Manager
Adam Molzer
Housing Funding
HSHF & AHB
09-10-2025
Headline Copy Goes Here
2
Spring 2025 Reflections
Process Improvements for 2026
1
2
9/5/2025
2
Headline Copy Goes HerePrior Year Comparisons 2022-2025
3
Headline Copy Goes Here
4
Prior Year Comparisons 2022-2025
3
4
9/5/2025
3
Headline Copy Goes Here
5
HSHFBAHB
• Full Application Materials
• Presentations from Applicants
• Q&A Session with Applicants
(joint meeting with AHB)
• Full Application Materials
• Presentations from Applicants
• Q&A Session with Applicants
(joint meeting with HSHFB)
Materials & Interaction with
Applicants
• Dialogue at March 26 Joint Meeting
• Discussed AHB Rankings at April 9 Regular
Meeting
• Dialogue at March 26 Joint Meeting
• AHB Ranking and Comments Sent to HSHFB for Non-Binding
Consideration
Exchanges with Other
Board
• Housing Strategic Plan
• HUD Consolidated Plan
• Maximizing Funds
• Leverage Provided from City Funds
• Vulnerable Populations: seniors,
mobile home parks, etc.
• Individual Assessment of Proposal
Merits
• Housing Strategic Plan
• HUD Consolidated Plan
• Vulnerable Populations: seniors,
disability, etc.
• Individual Assessment of Proposal
Merits
Guiding Factors
• New Units
• Preservation of Units
• New UnitsPrioritization
Staff Guidance Not Given
on Prioritization
Headline Copy Goes Here
6
2026 Considerations
•Rubric
•More Collaboration and Interaction
•Increased Detail and Explanation
•Rankings Submitted to Council
5
6