Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/18/2025 - Historic Preservation Commission - AGENDA - Regular Meeting (2)06/18/2025 Agenda Page 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 18, 2025, 5:30PM – 10:00PM Online via Zoom or in person at City Hall, 300 Laporte Avenue, Council Chambers This hybrid HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION meeting will be available online via Zoom, by phone, or in person at City Hall, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521. The meeting will be available to join beginning at 5:00p.m. Participants should join at least 15 minutes prior to the 5:30 p.m. start time. ONLINE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: You will need an internet connection on a laptop, computer, or smartphone, and may join the meeting through Zoom at https://fcgov.zoom.us/j/97119271921 Webinar ID: 97119271921 (Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio). Keep yourself on muted status. For public comments, the Chairperson will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to comment. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION BY PHONE: Please dial +1 720 928 9299 and enter Webinar ID 971 1927 1921. Keep yourself on muted status. For public comments, when the Chair asks participants to click the “Raise Hand” button if they wish to speak, phone participants will need to press *9 to do this. Staff will be moderating the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION. When you are called, press *6 to unmute yourself. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PERSON: To participate in person, individuals should come to City Hall, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521 and be prepared to follow strict social distancing guidelines. There may be needs to limit the number of individuals in the meeting room, and thus staging for individuals to speak may need to occur in the lobby or outside (weather permitting). Individuals who wish to speak will line up along the northern wall, maintaining physical distancing. The chairperson will call upon each participant to speak. (Continued on next page) Packet Pg. 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 18, 2025, 5:30PM – 10:00PM Documents to Share: Any document or presentation a member of the public wishes to provide to the HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION for its consideration must be emailed to preservation@fcgov.com at least 48 hours before the meeting. Provide Comments via Email: Individuals who are uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or participate by phone are encouraged to participate by emailing comments to preservation@fcgov.com at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. If your comments are specific to any of the discussion items on the agenda, please indicate that in the subject line of your email. Staff will ensure your comments are provided to the HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Documents to Share: If residents wish to share a document or presentation, Staff Liaison’s administrative professional needs to receive those materials via the above email address at least 48 hours before the meeting. Individuals uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or unable to participate by phone are encouraged to participate by emailing general public comments you may have to preservation@fcgov.com. The Staff Liaison’s administrative professional will ensure the HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION receives your comments. If you have specific comments on any of the discussion items scheduled, please make that clear in the subject line of the email and send 48 hours prior to the meeting. Fort Collins is a Certified Local Government (CLG) authorized by the National Park Service and History Colorado based on its compliance with federal and state historic preservation standards. CLG standing requires Fort Collins to maintain a Historic Preservation Commission composed of members of which a minimum of 40% meet federal standards for professional experience from preservation-related disciplines, including, but not limited to, historic architecture, architectural history, archaeology, and urban planning. For more information, see Article III, Division 19 of the Fort Collins Municipal Code. The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221- 6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Upon request, the City of Fort Collins will provide language access services for individuals who have limited English proficiency, or auxiliary aids and services for individuals with disabilities, to access City services, programs and activities. Contact 970.221.6515 (V/TDD: Dial 711 for Relay Colorado) for assistance. Please provide 48 hours advance notice when possible. A solicitud, la Ciudad de Fort Collins proporcionará servicios de acceso a idiomas para personas que no dominan el idioma inglés, o ayudas y servicios auxiliares para personas con discapacidad, para que puedan acceder a los servicios, programas y actividades de la Ciudad. Para asistencia, llame al 970.221.6515 (V/TDD: Marque 711 para Relay Colorado). Por favor proporcione 48 horas de aviso previo cuando sea posible. Packet Pg. 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 18, 2025, 5:30PM – 10:00PM Commissioners • CALL TO ORDER • ROLL CALL • STAFF REVIEW OF AGENDA o This review provides an opportunity for Staff to review the posted meeting and agenda and provide the Commission with any last-minute updates that may affect the order of agenda items. • CONSENT AGENDA REVIEW o The Chair will invite public requests for a Commissioner to “pull” any items off the Consent Agenda. This is not the time for public comment on the item. o Any Commissioner, at the Commissioner’s own prerogative or in response to a request from the public, may “pull” an item off the Consent Agenda to be considered as a separate item. o Pulled Consent Agenda items will have the opportunity for public comment and will be considered before scheduled discussion items. • COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS REMAINING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA • PUBLIC COMMENT FOLLOW UP FROM COMMISSION • CONSENT AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF MAY 21, 2025 The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the May 21, 2025 regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission. Packet Pg. 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 18, 2025, 5:30PM – 10:00PM • ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA • CONSENT AGENDA FOLLOW UP o This is an opportunity for Commissioners to comment on items adopted or approved on the Consent Agenda. • STAFF REPORTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA o This is an opportunity for staff to provide updates on general activities at the City of Fort Collins related to the work of the Commission. • COMMISSIONER REPORTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA o This is an opportunity for commissioners to share individual activities and updates related to the work of the commission. • CONSIDERATION OF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS o Any agenda item a Commissioner pulled from the Consent Agenda will be given time for a staff presentation on the item, public comment, and discussion, and the Commission will act on the item at this time. • DISCUSSION AGENDA Each item on the Discussion Agenda will be given time for a staff presentation, public comment, and discussion, and the Commission will act on the item in its agenda order. 2. REPORT ON STAFF ACTIVITIES SINCE THE LAST MEETING Staff is tasked with an array of different responsibilities including code-required project review decisions on historic properties, support to other standing and special work groups across the City organization, and education and outreach programming. This report will provide highlights for the benefit of Commissioners and the public, and for transparency regarding decisions made without the input of the Historic Preservation Commission. Packet Pg. 4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 18, 2025, 5:30PM – 10:00PM 3. LAND USE CODE UPDATES – THE FUTURE OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS AND CENTERS Building on the foundation of the City’s first round of Land Use Code updates, which were adopted by the City Council in May 2024 and focused on housing-related updates, The Future of Commercial Corridors and Centers project is exploring a broader range of topics focused on commercial areas. These updates are focused on commercial zone districts, corridors and development standards to ensure they align with current city policies and community needs, specifically. STAFF: Megan Keith, Senior City Planner Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager 4. THE LINDEN, 360 LINDEN STREET – CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Development application at 360 Linden Street to include two (2) five-story buildings, the larger of which will be mixed-use. The project includes approximately 2,500ft2 of commercial space and a total of 160 housing units. Of those 160 units, a submitted affidavit indicates 20%, or 32 units, will be affordable. OWNER/ APPLICANT: STAFF: Realty Capital Residential (Spencer Long, representing) 909 Lake Carolyn Parkway, Ste 150 Irving, TX 75039 Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner 5. CLAY FAMILY HISTORY PRESENTATION – IN HONOR OF JUNETEENTH Juneteenth is a federal, state, and local holiday that commemorates June 19, 1865, when Major General Gordon Granger led Union soldiers into Galveston, Texas, bringing news that slavery in the United States had ended by executive decree. In 2025, the City of Fort Collins will recognize the Juneteenth holiday on Thursday, June 19 by closing all City offices. The free community Juneteenth celebration will take place at the Foothills Mall on Friday, June 20 and Saturday, June 21 at Foothills Mall. The event is presented by the Black Professionals Network, in collaboration with the Foothills Mall, the City of Fort Collins, and United Way of Larimer County. Event information is at https://www.focojuneteenth.com/. In honor of Juneteenth, Meg Dunn, Vice President of Historic Larimer County, will present her research on a formerly enslaved early Fort Collins resident, Charlie Packet Pg. 5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 18, 2025, 5:30PM – 10:00PM African American to settle in what became Larimer County. His story is full of adventure, tribulations, and an entrepreneurial spirit. Meg Dunn has been fascinated by Charlie’s story ever since she first heard of him, and she is eager to share his tales of daring do, brushes with fame, and his all-around congenial spirit. STAFF: Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager • OTHER BUSINESS OF THE COMMISSION o Commissioners may raise new topics that may properly come before the HPC for consideration. • ADJOURNMENT Packet Pg. 6 Agenda Item 1 Item 1, Page 1 Historic Preservation Commission STAFF Melissa Matsunaka, Sr. Project Coordinator SUBJECT CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 21, 2025 REGULAR MEETING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the May 21, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS 1. HPC May 21, 2025 Minutes – DRAFT Packet Pg. 7 5/21/25 – MINUTES Historic Preservation Commission REGULAR MEETING May 21, 2025 – 5:30 PM Council Chambers, City Hall 300 Laporte Ave Also via Zoom •CALL TO ORDER Chair Gibson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. •ROLL CALL o Commission Members Present – Bonnie Gibson (Chair) Jenna Edwards Chris Conway Jeff Gaines Jim Rose David Woodlee o Commission Members Absent – Margo Carlock (Vice Chair) Aaron Hull o Staff Members Present – Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Division Manager Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner Heather Jarvis, Assistant City Attorney Melissa Matsunaka, HPC Admin o Guest(s) – None •AGENDA REVIEW Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner, reviewed the published agenda. •COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION ON ITEMS ON OR NOT ON THE AGENDA None. •CONSENT AGENDA REVIEW No items were pulled from consent. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 DRA F T Packet Pg. 8 5/21/25 – MINUTES • CONSENT AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 2025. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the April 16, 2025 regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission. Commissioner Rose moved, seconded by Commissioner Gaines, to approve the Consent Agenda. Yeas: Conway, Edwards, Gaines, Rose, Woodlee, and Gibson. Nays: none. THE MOTION CARRIED. • STAFF REPORTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. • COMMISSIONER REPORTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. • CONSENT AGENDA FOLLOW UP None. • DISCUSSION AGENDA 2. REPORT ON STAFF ACTIVITIES SINCE THE LAST MEETING Staff is tasked with an array of different responsibilities including code-required project review decisions on historic properties, support to other standing and special work groups across the City organization, and education & outreach programming. This report will provide highlights for the benefit of Commission members and the public, and for transparency regarding decisions made without the input of the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner, noted May is Historic Preservation Month and discussed the Friend of Preservation Awards which went to four groups of people. He also reported on a design review for a City landmark on West Magnolia Street, a tabling at the Museum of Discovery as part of its member night activities, an upcoming reprisal of the Montezuma Fuller presentation at the Museum of Discovery on May 29th, an upcoming tabling at the Pride in the Park event on June 1st, the upcoming Big Splash event on June 14th at Waterworks, and the community celebration of Juneteenth June 20th-21st. 3. SINGLE-UNIT DWELLING DEMOLITION NOTIFICATION – 408 NORTH LOOMIS AVENUE Single-unit dwellings that are at least fifty years old and that are proposed for demolition to clear a property for a new single-unit dwelling are subject to the demolition notification process administered by the Historic Preservation staff and the Historic Preservation Commission. Demolition notification in this circumstance provides an opportunity to inform residents of changes in their neighborhood and to identify potentially important historic, architectural, and cultural resources, pursuant STAFF: STAFF PRESENTATION Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner, stated this item is a demolition notification for the single-unit house at 408 North Loomis Avenue. He noted the Commission could acknowledge the notification and take no action or make a motion to initiate landmark designation. He provided a brief history of the property and renovations and showed maps and photographs of the house. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 DRA F T Packet Pg. 9 5/21/25 – MINUTES PUBLIC PARTICIPATION None. COMMISSION QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION Commissioner Edwards commented on failing to recognize working class history in the community, which was theme for both this structure and 121 North Whitcomb Street. She stated that while the properties themselves may not have intrinsic historic value, there is still a story behind them that is important to the community and ways to tell it could be worth considering. Commissioner Conway concurred. Chair Gibson stated the Commission will acknowledge notification and take no further action. 4. SINGLE-UNIT DWELLING DEMOLITION NOTIFICATION – 121 NORTH WHITCOMB STREET DESCRIPTION: demolition to clear a property for a new single-unit dwelling are subject to the demolition notification process administered by the Historic Preservation staff and the Historic Preservation Commission. Demolition notification in this circumstance provides an opportunity to inform residents of changes in their neighborhood and to identify potentially important historic, architectural, and cultural resources, pursuant STAFF: Rebekah Schields, Historic Preservation Specialist STAFF PRESENTATION Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner, stated this item is a demolition notification for the single-unit house at 121 North Whitcomb Street. He noted the Commission could acknowledge the notification and take no action or make a motion to initiate landmark designation. He provided a brief history of the property and renovations and showed maps and photographs of the house. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION None. COMMISSION QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION Chair Gibson stated the Commission will acknowledge notification and take no further action. 5. 1719 MATHEWS STREET: APPEAL OF DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY This item is to consider the appeal of the determination of eligibility for Fort Collins Landmark designation of the residential property at 1719 Mathews Street. On December 2, 2024, in fulfillment of a pre-submittal requirement for a development review application, staff determined that the property was Landmark-eligible based on evidence and conclusions presented by an independent historic survey contractor in an intensive-level survey form. When undergoing development review, Landmark-eligible properties are subject to the historic resource requirements in Fort Collins Land Use Code Section 5.8.1. Staff decisions may be appealed to the Historic Preservation Commission. The property owner, Paul Kenny, submitted written notice to appeal the finding on December 6 and elected to delay the appeal for six months to allow time to prepare arguments. STAFF: APPELLANT: Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner Paul J. Kenny ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 DRA F T Packet Pg. 10 5/21/25 – MINUTES Paul Kenny, appellant, stated he is withdrawing his appeal. 6. 1719 MATHEWS STREET: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW Conceptual design review for a duplex on the location of the existing 1719 Mathews single-unit dwelling. Demolition is proposed. This item is to provide advance feedback on the proposal, including a staff-supported Modification of Standards. This item is contingent on the Eligibility appeal immediately prior to this item on the agenda, if the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) determines 1719 Mathews to be Eligible. Should the HPC determine the property Not Eligible, then this item will not be heard since, in the event of that decision, there would be no historic resources on the development site to which to apply the requirements of Land Use Code 5.8.1. STAFF: APPLICANT/ OWNER Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner Paul J. Kenny Commissioner Gaines noted his wife is an architect in Fort Collins and was involved in the Design Assistance Program grant for this property to develop some sketches for the proposed duplex adaptive reuse. STAFF PRESENTATION Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner, showed photos of the house at 1719 Mathews Street and discussed its landmark eligibility and significance under standard three for design and construction. He noted the historian who surveyed the property found it had sufficient integrity to convey its significance. Bertolini discussed architecture in the area and noted the contemporary modern style is somewhat rare in these types of more working-class neighborhoods. He also provided some additional information about Harold Schultz who designed and built the home. In terms of the conceptual development review, Bertolini noted the Commission is tasked with providing informal comments related to the proposal to demolish this building and construct a duplex, which would typically not be allowed under the Land Use Code. He noted staff is presenting a modification of standard to allow for the demolition and is requesting feedback as to whether the Commission is supportive of staff’s interpretation of the modification and whether it is warranted. Bertolini stated staff is recommending the Commission waive the requirement under Land Use Code Section 5.8.1 to preserve the existing residence in a manner that meets the federal preservation standards that have been adopted. He stated the rationale for the recommendation is based on zoning, which is Low-Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (LMN), and the expectation from a larger City planning perspective is to densify the neighborhood from single-family housing to missing middle housing with more attached dwellings. He noted the property is adjacent to the Transit Oriented District overlay zone which also allows for greater density. Bertolini stated the other rationale is based on hardship, specifically given the asbestos siding on the home, which is a character-defining feature of the building but is also a health concern; therefore, staff is not supportive of maintaining the material on the site. Given the significance of the siding, the material conservation options are limited. Bertolini stated the design assistance products attached to the item show technically feasible options to densify the property into a duplex while retaining the existing building; however, most have additional site and regulatory constraints in terms of forestry, stormwater, and engineering. Additionally, Bertolini noted there are other nearby examples of Harold Schultz’ building work and of modern and contemporary style architecture. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 DRA F T Packet Pg. 11 5/21/25 – MINUTES APPLICANT PRESENTATION Paul Kenny stated the property is currently an eyesore and detriment to the neighborhood. He stated he has discussed the proposal with neighbors who are supportive of having a new residence constructed. Additionally, he stated keeping the structure with the asbestos siding does not seem to be feasible. PUBLIC COMMENT None. COMMISSION QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION Chair Gibson asked if there are likely to be many more properties with asbestos siding and whether allowing this demolition would be setting a precedent. Bertolini replied specific site conditions are always taken into account with historic preservation and staff did not just consider the asbestos siding in its recommendation, but also considered the other site constraints and zone district which made it difficult to support a preservation solution. He noted asbestos siding was a common building material in mid-20th century housing and it is unlikely a preservation solution would be sought for that material, though there are other options for new materials that mimic that type of shingling. Commissioner Conway commended the staff work and recommendation to allow an increase in density in this case, particularly given the property’s proximity to the large transit investments made by the City. Chair Gibson commented on the city’s need for densification and on the importance of eliminating hazardous materials to improve environmental safety. She expressed support for the demolition of the property. Commissioner Woodlee concurred. Commissioner Rose noted the character-defining element, while an important element of that period of time and this is an excellent example of a post-war material that was widely used throughout the country, it is now known to be a hazard. He expressed support for the modification to demolish the structure. Commissioner Gaines commented on the difference between recording history and preserving history and the goal of keeping things in existence is that they serve a public good, which is not the case with asbestos siding. Commissioner Conway moved, seconded by Commissioner Gaines, that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend to the decision maker, an administrative hearing officer, the approval of a modification of standards to waive the requirement to preserve the landmark eligible property at 1719 Mathews Street in a manner that complies with the federal treatment standards for rehabilitation, and allow for the construction of a duplex on that site, finding that the modification is warranted under Section 6.8.2, Modification of Standards, Section 8, Step 8, Standards 2 and 3, by helping to substantially alleviate an existing defined and described problem of city-wide concern, namely the provision of increased housing choice and additional housing units, and by reason of exceptional physical condition or other extraordinary and exceptional situations unique to such property, specifically the presence of asbestos siding on most of the building, and that the strict application of the standards sought to be modified would result in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties and undue hardship upon the owner of such property that are not caused by the act or omission of the applicant. Yeas: Conway, Edwards, Gaines, Rose, Woodlee, and Gibson. Nays: none. THE MOTION CARRIED. (**Secretary’s Note: Assistant City Attorney Jarvis noted Councilmember Tricia Canonico is present at the meeting as the Council Liaison to the Commission.) 7. 201 S. COLLEGE (OLD POST OFFICE) – CONCEPTUAL LANDMARK DESIGN REVIEW This item is to provide a conceptual review of a proposed addition to the Old Post Office, a City Landmark at 201 S College Avenue. The proposal includes an addition ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 DRA F T Packet Pg. 12 5/21/25 – MINUTES on the south side of the historic building, interior non-structural alterations to the historic building, demolition of the 1940s era loading dock on the south side, and excavations adjacent to the existing foundation. The owner is seeking initial feedback regarding their concept designs and their consistency with the US . STAFF: APPLICANT/ Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager Fort Collins Museum of Art STAFF PRESENTATION Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager, stated this item is a conceptual landmark design review of a proposed addition to the south side of the City landmark at 201 South College Avenue, the old post office location. She noted the addition includes some interior non- structural alterations to the historic building, some demolition of the 1940’s era loading dock on the south side, and excavation adjacent to the existing foundation. Bzdek noted the Commission is tasked with providing the applicant with early feedback on project concepts and whether it finds the concepts meet the standards. Bzdek provided site information and photos of the property. She reviewed the history of the property which originally housed the post office and other federal offices. In 1972, the main post office moved to 301 South Howes Street and the building was vacated by the federal government and sold to a private party, which did seek tax credits for a rehab project to reopen the building to accommodate nine business tenants. In 1985, the owner opted to put the property up for sale, and it was deemed to be eligible for landmark designation at that time and the Cultural Resources Board recommended designation to City Council. Bzdek noted a demolition permit was issued pending the denial of designation; however, City Council unanimously supported designation and it was the first and only non-consensual landmark nomination of a single property in the history of the city. Bzdek provided a summary of the work that has been done on the property over the years, most recently a rehabilitation of the clay tile roof. Additionally, she detailed the building’s architectural elements and noted the proposed addition would be a functional space for the Museum of Art that addresses several issues, including lack of an accessible entry meeting ADA requirements, lack of adequate climate control and fire suppression systems, limited gallery space, and a lack of space for supportive functions. Bzdek outlined staff’s assessment of the proposed design noting the addition provides functional space that is necessary to achieve the current use requirements and achieves a solution to a long-standing problem with the Museum regarding the lack of a primary accessible entrance. She stated staff finds the project to be generally consistent with the standards for rehabilitation and the construction appears to be compatible, distinguishable, subordinate, and mindful of the need to retain visibility of historic materials and design details. Additionally, there is a requirement for hyphenation in densely built environments, which is a component of the proposal. Bzdek outlined suggested discussion questions for the Commission. Commissioner Gaines noted his wife is an employee of [au]workshop, and based on discussions with staff, he does not believe he needs to recuse himself from the discussion of this item. APPLICANT PRESENTATION Lisa Hatchadoorian, Museum of Art Executive Director, noted the Museum bought the building in 1989 and opened for exhibitions in 1990. In 2012, the lower floor and upper floors were sold due to a catastrophic flood, and in 2022, the Museum was given the opportunity to purchase the upper floors back, which it did. She discussed the need for accessibility, more exhibit space, classrooms, office space, and storage in the building. She stated the plan for the addition will be ten to fifteen years out. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 DRA F T Packet Pg. 13 5/21/25 – MINUTES Randy Shortridge, [au]workshop, discussed the construction and architecture of the existing building and showed photos of the building’s exterior and interior during construction and over time. He commented on the south façade being the rear of the building given the loading dock and service uses, despite some thoughts that the west façade is the rear. He reviewed possibilities for expansion of the building and discussed how the ultimate proposal can best be designed. Shortridge discussed the proposed design of the addition to combine civic and commercial building typologies. He noted the design removes all service components from College Avenue and makes all of that frontage activated uses. He provided floorplan and façade renderings of the proposed addition and noted the addition is modern in design and defers to the original building. He noted the existing building is not being used to hold up the new building at all and discussed the compatibility components of the addition and hyphen, which is set down lower than both the addition and existing building. He went on to discuss the proposed material palette. (**Secretary’s Note: The Commission took a brief recess at this point in the meeting.) PUBLIC COMMENT None. COMMISSION QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION Commissioner Gaines asked if any thought has been given to restoring the interior of the building to its historical character by opening up the second floor. Hatchadoorian replied there had been some drawings completed with some of those ideas in 2008, but that is not something that is being considered now. Commissioner Rose noted neither of the two existing building entrances would be used with this design and expressed concern they still appear as operable entrances. He suggested the possibility of utilizing the ceremonial aspect of those entrances in a different way. Shortridge commented on the design of the Metropolitan Museum in New York which has a large staircase that has become a place to sit and meet, which is what the staircases on this building will likely become. He noted signage will direct people to the new main entrance. Commissioner Rose suggested looking at the Boston Public Library that fronts onto Copley Plaza for an example of steps that function as congregation spaces. He suggested something could be done with the lower level of the steps to indicate them as being such spaces. Commissioner Gaines commended the efforts in documenting the existing building and commended the inclusion of the eave garden. Commissioner Conway commended the design and the activation of the service space on College Avenue as well as the eave garden. Chair Gibson stated standard one is definitely met given the addition will be perpetuating the existing use. Members concurred with all written materials provided by staff in terms of the proposal meeting applicable standards and criteria. Shortridge asked if there is a maximum amount of time an approval would last. Bertolini replied Municipal Code Chapter 14 states any certificate of appropriateness is only valid for twelve months and can be extended for an additional twelve months. Shortridge asked if the Commission could extend an approval. Bertolini replied the Code only allows one extension. Chair Gibson asked about the planned timeframe. Shortridge replied there are three planned phases, first to pay off the existing building and upgrade some systems, second to add an accessible entrance, and third to complete the addition. The accessible entrance component will be an interim design and will turn the parking lot into a plaza that can be utilized for various activities, which will hopefully occur in the next two years. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 DRA F T Packet Pg. 14 5/21/25 – MINUTES Bzdek noted the Commission will need to respond to existing conditions in the future and stated the Commission could move to final review and make a decision for approval if that is helpful to the Museum; however, that would time out one way or the other. Shortridge stated there would be some political and fundraising capital from receiving approval from the Commission that would help in getting to the next point. Commissioner Gaines commented on the historic photos showing the stairs on College being quite different with the lower section of the stairs being at ground level. He suggested the applicant could study that design as a way to potentially activate the area. Commissioner Edwards asked if the applicant would need to come back before the Commission if they make a change to the design after a final approval is granted. Assistant City Attorney Jarvis stated any changes would need to come before the Commission. Commissioner Conway moved, seconded by Commissioner Gaines, that the Historic Preservation Commission move to final review of the proposed work for the old post office at 201 South College and issue a certificate of appropriateness finding that the proposed work is consistent with the Secretary of Interior standards for rehabilitation in Chapter 14, Article IV of the Municipal Code. Commissioner Rose stated he supports the final review approach because the Secretary of Interior standards are being met and he commended the applicant stating the design reflects a sensitive interpretation of what the standards are requesting. He also encouraged the applicant to see if there are other possibilities for the stairs. The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Conway, Edwards, Gaines, Rose, Woodlee, and Gibson. Nays: none. THE MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Rose moved, seconded by Commissioner Woodlee, that the Historic Preservation Commission approve the proposal for the addition to the old post office at 201 South College as presented finding that the proposal work meets the Secretary of Interior standards for rehabilitation. Yeas: Conway, Edwards, Gaines, Rose, Woodlee, and Gibson. Nays: none. THE MOTION CARRIED. • OTHER BUSINESS Chair Gibson noted the Virginia Dale Stage Station is having an open house on June 14th. • ADJOURNMENT Chair Gibson adjourned the meeting at 8:03 p.m. Minutes prepared by and respectfully submitted by Melissa Matsunaka. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 DRA F T Packet Pg. 15 Agenda Item 2 Item 2, Page 1 Historic Preservation Commission ITEM NAME STAFF ACTIVITIES SINCE THE LAST MEETING (COVERING MAY 9 TO JUNE 4) STAFF Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner Rebekah Schields, Historic Preservation Specialist Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager INFORMATION Staff are tasked with an array of different responsibilities including code-required project review decisions on historic properties, support to other standing and special work groups across the City organization, and education & outreach programming. This report will provide highlights for the benefit of Commission members and the public, and for transparency regarding decisions made without the input of the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). For cases where a project can be reviewed/approved without referral to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) through the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness or a SHPO report under Chapter 14, Article IV of the City’s Municipal Code., staff decisions are provided in this report and are also posted on the HPS’s “Design Review Notification” page. Notice of staff decisions are provided to the public and HPC for their information, but are not subject to appeal under Chapter 14, Article IV, except in cases where an applicant has requested a Certificate of Appropriateness for a project and that request has been denied. In that event, the applicant may appeal staff’s decision to the HPC pursuant to 14-55 of the Municipal Code, within two weeks of staff denial. Beginning in May 2021, to increase transparency regarding staff decisions and letters issued on historic preservation activities, this report will include sections for historic property survey results finalized in the last month (provided they are past the two-week appeal deadline), comments issued for federal undertakings under the National Historic Preservation Act (also called “Section 106”), and 5G wireless facility responses for local permit approval. There is a short staff presentation this month highlighting recent items and events. Packet Pg. 16 Agenda Item 2 Item 2, Page 2 Part of the mission of the Historic Preservation Services division is to educate the public about local, place- based history, historic preservation, and preservation best practices. Below are highlights from the last month Program Title Description of Discovery Members Museum of Discovery members/public Tabling in lobby 14 May 16, 2025 Montezuma Fuller: Reprisal Historic Larimer County; Museum of Discovery; HPS the importance of Montezuma Fuller to local 60 May 29, 2025 Fort Collins Pride 400+/- June 1, 2025 Staff Design Review Decisions & Reports – Municipal Code Chapter 14 Property Address Description of Project Staff Decision Date of Decision 200 Jefferson St, UPRR Passenger New sign for Rodizio Grill; NRHP-listed; Reviewed under LUC 5.8.1. Approved May 14, 2025 414 E. Elizabeth, H.K. Meyer House shingle); Reviewed under MC 14, Article Report issued May 15, 2025 233-235 Linden St, Poudre Valley Bank membrane); Old Town Landmark District; Approved May 22, 2025 638 Whedbee St, Dodd-Ghent Residence garage approved on prior CoA). City Landmark; reviewed under MC 14, Article Approved June 3, 2025 146 N. College Ave, Commercial Bank & Town Landmark District; Reviewed under Approved June 4, 2026 Selected Staff Development Review Recommendations – Land Use Code 5.8.1 Property Address Description of Project Staff Decision Date of Decision / Recommendation 430 N. College Ave, Power House CSU-funded xeriscape/pollinator garden in front yard between Powerhouse (City Landmark) and encouragement to include selective restoration of historic Grotto into May 15, 2025 Packet Pg. 17 Agenda Item 2 Item 2, Page 3 1029 Ponderosa Dr Conceptual Development Review for either an ADU or Duplex conversion review required; if duplex, then historic survey and potential design compatibility of new construction with existing June 5, 2025 Historic Property Survey Results City Preservation staff frequently completes historic survey for properties for various reasons, usually in advance of development proposals for properties. The table below includes historic property surveys Address Eligible (staff) Y May 21, 2025 N/A none completed/certified at time of report (1000 W. Prospect Rd, 1501 S. Lemay Ave, 1402 The table below includes historic property surveys for the reporting period for any historic surveys that are underway but not yet complete. HPC members and members of the public with information are encouraged to Address Age of Property Proposed Use/Outcome Status of Survey 1402 Peterson St. 1922 Exploring Landmark designation 1000 W. Prospect Rd, Coffin Property c.1930 incorporated and/or relocated, Assigned to historian 1501 S. Lemay Ave. c.1973 Assigned to historian 1185 Westward Dr, 1207, 1211, and 1215 S. Shields St. 1960, 1949, 1923, and 1914 approved; exploration of project modification to 4-story; previous historic survey expired and doesn’t meet Application for survey received Packet Pg. 18 Agenda Item 2 Item 2, Page 4 National Historic Preservation Act – Staff Comments Issued The City of Fort Collins is a Certified Local Government, which provides the Historic Preservation Services division and Landmark Preservation Commission an opportunity to formally comment on federal undertakings within city limits. This includes actions that are receiving federal funding, permits, or have direct involvement from a federal agency. Note: Due to changes in how Preservation staff process small cell/5G wireless facilities, staff does not provide substantive comments on those undertakings (overseen by the Federal Communications Commission) and do not appear in the table below. National Historic Preservation Act – Staff Comments Issued The City of Fort Collins is a Certified Local Government, which provides the Historic Preservation Services division and Landmark Preservation Commission an opportunity to formally comment on federal undertakings within city limits. This includes actions that are receiving federal funding, permits, or have direct involvement Lead Agency & Property Location Description of Project Staff Comment Date Comment Development (HUD); 713 Aztec Dr. & 1620 Azalea Interior rehabilitation for two properties operated by Neighbor 2 Neighbor. Concur, No Historic Properties Affected May 1, 2025 Staff 5G Wireless Facility Summary Note: Co-locations with existing street infrastructure, usually traffic lights, is considered a co-location and not subject to denial due to proximity to properties that meet the City’s definition of historic resources (Sec. 14-3) As noted above, Preservation staff does not provide substantive comments regarding these undertakings. Within this period, staff processed a total of 11 5G/Small Cell tower requests total, with 7 seen for the first time. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Presentation Packet Pg. 19 Headline Copy Goes Here June 18, 2025 Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation PlannerYani Jones, Historic Preservation PlannerRebekah Schields, Historic Preservation SpecialistMaren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager Historic Preservation Commission Staff Activity Report Headline Copy Goes Here 2 Education/Outreach Highlight Fort Collins Pride, June 1 • First unique to Fort Collins in several years • Celebrates LGBTQ+ individuals in our community • Staff tabled in the Heritage Courtyard • Approx. 400 people dropped by the table •Proclamation June 3 Montezuma Fuller Reprise, May 29 1 2 ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 20 Headline Copy Goes Here 3 Upcoming Education/Outreach Opportunities June 14 – The Big Splash at the Waterworks on Overland Trail June 20-21 – Juneteenth community celebration Headline Copy Goes HereJoin Our Newsletter! 4 • Get monthly updates and information from Historic Preservation Services directly in your inbox such as: • Upcoming events/activities • Historic Preservation Commission agenda overviews • Notification of historic surveys in progress and completed • Notification of single-family residential demolitions • Local preservation financial support program open/close notifications • Landmark spotlights • And more! • Scan the QR Code, or go to https://www.fcgov.com/subscriptions/#group_id_2, to sign up by toggling on the “Historic Preservation Matters” newsletter! 3 4 ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 21 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 1 Historic Preservation Commission ITEM NAME LAND USE CODE UPDATES – THE FUTURE OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS AND CENTERS STAFF Megan Keith, Senior City Planner Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager INFORMATION Building on the foundation of the City’s first round of Land Use Code updates, which were adopted by the City Council in May 2024 and focused on housing-related updates, The Future of Commercial Corridors and Centers project is exploring a broader range of topics focused on commercial areas. These updates are focused on commercial zone districts, corridors and development standards to ensure they align with current city policies and community needs, specifically. • Advancing the City’s 15-Minute City goals • Aligning with existing City policy plans • Balancing desired outcomes • Adding clarity to the City's Development Review Process In addition to the above, the following Guiding Principles were developed utilizing goals, policies and action items from the adopted policy plan documents in addition to Council priorities and are helping to guide this work. • Enable more housing and mixed-use buildings, especially along roads with frequent bus service. • Create resilient commercial and employment centers that are adaptable to future needs. • Create clearer building and site design standards that promote transit use, walking, and rolling along roads with frequent bus service. • Improve Predictability of the Land Use Code, especially to support small business owners. Project Focus Areas Focus areas for Land Use Code updates have been identified based on Guiding Principles, community input, and analyses conducted by the consultant team and City staff. • Topic: Transit Oriented Development Overlay (TOD) District o Corresponding Guiding Principle: Enable more housing and mixed-use buildings, especially along roads with frequent bus service o Code Changes Under Consideration:  Recalibrating incentives for development in the TOD Overlay  Adjusting permitted uses in the TOD Overlay: limiting additional low-intensity or auto- centric uses  Recalibrating non-residential parking: lower or eliminate surface parking minimums, and lower parking maximums for commercial uses • Topic: Harmony Corridor and Employment Zones o Corresponding Guiding Principle: Create resilient commercial and employment centers that are adaptable to future needs o Code Changes Under Consideration: Packet Pg. 22 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 2  Adjust the primary/secondary use ratio in Harmony Corridor and Employment zone districts to allow a greater mix of land uses, including housing.  Introduce more flexibility in the Land Use Code for mixed-use buildings • Topic: Building Design Standards o Corresponding Guiding Principle: Create clearer building and site design standards that promote transit use, walking, and rolling along roads with frequent bus service o Code Changes Under Consideration:  Create non-residential building types (new Division 3.2 in the Land Use Code)  Consolidate and organize standards addressing non-residential buildings  Update pedestrian-oriented design standards to encourage walking, biking and rolling • Topic: Change of Use o Corresponding Guiding Principle: Improve predictability of the Land Use Code, especially to support small business owners o Code Changes Under Consideration:  Revision of the existing change-of use process COMMISSION’S ROLE: In this meeting, the Commission can provide feedback on the alternatives presented for each topic. Staff will return in August with draft code language and a request for a formal recommendation to City Council. Additionally, attached to this item is Council Member Conway’s draft letter to Council on the impact of minimum requirements over time in Downtown Fort Collins. The Commission may consider a motion at this time to approve the letter for delivery to Council, with or without amendments. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft letter from HPC on minimum parking requirements Packet Pg. 23 Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.4250 preservation@fcgov.com fcgov.com/historicpreservation Historic Preservation Commission June 18, 2025 RE: Historic Preservation Commission Position on Minimum Parking Requirements To: Mayor Jeni Arndt and Members of Council Through: Kelly DiMartino, City Manager Caryn Champine, Director, Planning, Development & Transportation Lori Schwarz, Director, Community Development & Neighborhood Services Maren Bzdek, Manager, Historic Preservation Services On a vote of #-# at its June 18, 2025, regular meeting, the Fort Collins Historic Preservation Commission supported this letter to City Council detailing the reasons why commercial parking minimums should be ended citywide, recognizing that such policies are essential to protecting our community's historic character. In the mid-20th century, historic buildings were often demolished or irreparably altered to accommodate parking, eroding the historic fabric and vibrant character of many communities, including our own. Perceived demand for parking led to the destruction of many culturally important landmarks and districts across America. Fort Collins experienced similar losses, compromising the integrity of our downtown's unique historic streetscape. Minimum requirements didn’t just reflect demand; by 1965 they mandated it. This ensured that more buildings would be razed or left vacant when they could not find the money or space to meet these requirements. As a result, parking minimums have both accelerated the destruction of historic places and made it harder to adaptively reuse what remains. Although the City’s first Zoning ordinance in 1929 did not specify off-street parking requirements, updates to that code in 1965 did, specifying that various uses needed to provide a minimum number of off-street parking based on that type of use.0F 1 Below is a list generally within the Downtown Zone District, of noteworthy buildings demolished to provide off-street parking, and development projects that reduced density through significant additions of off- street parking. Prior to Parking Minimums (1965 and earlier) -301 W. Mountain Ave, Steele’s Market (replacing the Franklin School) o Demolished 3 detached dwellings, a brick duplex, and a stone office building. o The Franklin School was already demolished by 1960. Steele’s was demolished in 2010 and the site now provides parking for Keybank Tower, the Farmer’s Market at the County Courthouse, and St. Joseph’s Catholic Church. 1 City of Fort Collins, “Zoning Ordinance of the Ciyt of Fort Collins,” adopted May 31, 1929, digital copy on file with Historic Preservation Services; City of Fort Collins, Ordinance 1965-46, published w/ map in the Fort Collins Coloradoan, September 28, 1965, pages 4-5 (adopted by City Council on October 14. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 24 After Parking Minimums (1965 or Later) - 100 S. College, Columbia Savings and Loan, 1966 o Two two-story masonry buildings were demolished for one one-story bank building with parking and a drive-thru (Note: 1966 building is now Landmark- Eligible based on Modern Movement architectural importance) - 310 S. College, Perkin’s (now redeveloped into Uncommon), 1979 o In 1960, the site that became a single restaurant with parking included a two- story doctor’s office, two brick dwellings, and the First Methodist Church. The Church was demolished in 1966 as part of plans for a new County building that never materialized. The remainder appear to have been demolished in advance of the 1979 restaurant construction to meet minimum parking requirements. - 300 W. Oak St, Home Federal Building (now Keybank Tower), 1968 o In 1960, three frame dwellings, and a brick club house were demolished to provide the accompanying parking west of the tower. - 200 Block W. Olive St., parking for First National Bank/Masonic Lodge, 1960s-1980s o In 1960, what is now exclusively parking contained four frame dwellings, a brick dwelling, a stone printing office, and the First Church of Christ Scientist building. These buildings appear to have been demolished individually over time to provide parking. - 501 S. College Ave, Fast Food (now GoodTimes), 1970 o Tore down Congregational Unitarian Church and brick doctor’s office/dwelling for drive-thru and associated parking at 115 W Mulberry. - 300 Remington St, DMA (Downtown Merch. Association) Plaza Apartments, 1973 o In about 1972, the project tore down Remington School to make way for parking on the south side of the building. o The project also tore down four frame dwellings on Mathews (303, 307, 311, & 315) to provide parking for the tower. - Block 103 (Mason/Magnolia/Howes/Olive), Bank Parking & Drive-thru, 1978-1980s o Demolition cleared these lots for both parking and a drive-thru for First National Bank. o The project demolished a total of eleven brick and frame dwellings and a duplex with a four-unit slot apartment addition off the back, that were all present in 1960. - 323 S. College, Clocktower Square, 1981 o Demolished an existing c.1958 one-story concrete office to construct the existing building. o Demolished a two-story brick apartment building and the 2-story brick Mountain State Telephone & Telegraph building to create the parking lot. - 531 S. College, First Presbyterian Parking, 1960-1980 o Between 1960 and 1980, the Church acquired the entire west half of the block to serve as surface vehicle parking. o This action demolished eight frame homes, two brick homes, one frame house with a commercial addition, and one stone shop. o The full church property is now listed in the Colorado Register of Historic Properties. - 460 S. College, Safeway (now Target), 1984 o In 1960, this block included a filling station, a masonry church building (First Christian Church), five single-unit dwellings, and two larger brick dwellings converted to apartments. These included the former Abner Loomis residence – Loomis was a prominent developer in the late-19th century and namesake of Loomis Avenue and the Loomis Addition, determined eligible as a City ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 25 Landmark District in 2012 as one of the city’s first successful new subdivisions after the original town plat in 1873. - 200 Block of Remington, demolished for parking in 1970s o In 1960, this block included 3 brick residences, one of which had been converted to apartments, 3 masonry commercial buildings on either corner, and a rest home (for seniors). - 639 S. Mason Street, 1 ½ story frame dwelling, demolished 1999 o Torn down for parking for 202 W. Laurel (Lee’s Cyclery) - 625 S. Mason Street, 3 dwellings and a brick shop, demolished prior to 1999 o Torn down for parking for 625 S. Mason (currently Match-Ups) - 718, 722, 724, & 726 S. College, 1 commercial building and 3 dwellings, torn down 2023 o Torn down for parking for 714 S. College Before parking minimums were imposed, Old Town Fort Collins thrived through flexible building designs and adaptive reuse. As highlighted in the recent staff survey of the Laurel and College area, and the recent survey of College Avenue via a State Historical Fund grant, buildings historically transitioned fluidly between uses without the burden of rigid parking requirements. This adaptability fostered a diverse, dynamic, and resilient urban core, one that preserved the city’s economic vitality, cultural richness, and visual character. Historically, Fort Collins had flexible land use policies allowing creativity and adaptation. Ending parking minimums significantly enhances opportunities for adaptive reuse, making historic buildings economically feasible to rehabilitate without necessitating harmful alterations or demolition for parking. Historic preservation groups in cities such as Philadelphia, Buffalo, and Los Angeles have supported and won parking reforms to drive revitalization and preservation. Fort Collins has the opportunity to adopt forward-thinking regulations that will protect our heritage and ensure future residents can experience vibrant, historic neighborhoods with as much character as Old Town. By eliminating commercial parking minimums, we can foster the kind of sustainable, dynamic urban growth that respects our past while thoughtfully accommodating the future. We urge you to take this critical step toward enhancing historic preservation by eliminating commercial parking minimums. Sincerely, Bonnie Gibson Chair, Historic Preservation Commission ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 26 Selection of Historical Photographs of Buildings Discussed in Letter Franklin School, 301 W. Mountain, c.1950, demolished prior to 1960, FCMOD, H17170, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/4758/rec/2. Steele’s Market, c.1968, built in 1963; demolished buildings on NW corner of the block, FCMOD, 309WMt68, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/29132/rec/1. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 27 101 and 107-109 E Mountain, c.1910, demolished in 1966 for Columbia Savings & Loan, FCMOD, H01454, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/14053/rec/30 Methodist Episcopal Church, 300 S. College Ave, c.1920s, demolished 1966, FCMOD, H08043f, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/49999/rec/12. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 28 F.J. Annis Residence, 310 S. College Avenue, demolished prior to 1979, FCMOD, H05831, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/23891/rec/3 122 S. Meldrum St., demolished for Home Federal Building (now Keybank) tower parking prior to 1968, FCMOD, 122sme48, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/7197/rec/1. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 29 324 W. Oak, the Ogden Residence (turned club house by 1960), designed by architect E. Francis Williams, 1953, demolished prior to 1968 for Home Federal Building (now Keybank Tower) parking, FCMOD, H04247, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/14401/rec/5 Unity Church/Congregational Unitarian Church, 501 S. College, c.1922, demolished in 1970 for a fast food restaurant, FCMOD, H28259, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/54653/rec/4 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 30 115 W. Mulberry, home and doctor’s office, 1948, demolished in 1970 for parking related to fast food restaurant at 501 S. College, FCMOD, 115wmu48, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/7019/rec/4 Remington School at 316 Remington St, torn down in c.1972 to provide parking for the DMA Plaza apartments at 300 Remington, FCMOD, C01518, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/10092/rec/3 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 31 202 & 206 W Magnolia, c.1980, demolished in 1990 for a parking lot, FCMOD, H23186, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/29359/rec/1. 209 W. Olive, 1968, demolished along with its accessory dwelling unit prior to 1978 for the existing First National Bank drive-through facility, FCMOD, 209WOl68, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/7778/rec/4 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 32 211 W. Olive, 1948, demolished prior to 1978 for First National Bank drive through, FCMOD, 211WOl48, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/7807/rec/1 310 S. Howes, 1968, demolished c.1978 for parking related to First National Bank drive through, FCMOD, 310SHo68, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/8402/rec/3 312 S. Howes, 1968, demolished c.1978 for First National Bank parking, FCMOD, 312SHo68, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/8439/rec/1 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 33 316 S. Howes, 1948, demolished c.1978 for First National Bank parking, FCMOD, 316 SHo48, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/8507/rec/1 Mountain State Telephone & Telegraph Co. Bldg at 317 S. College Ave, 1949, demolished for parking for Clocktower Square in 1981, FCMOD, 317SCol49, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/20354/rec/1 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 34 Brick dwelling-turned-apartments at 319 S. College Ave, 1969, demolished in 1981 for parking for Clocktower Square, FCMOD, 319Cos69, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/20343/rec/1 121 W. Mulberry, 1948, demolished between 1960-1980 for First Presbyterian Church parking, FCMOD, 121wmu48, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/7158/rec/1 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 35 Shop at 127 W. Mulberry, and residence at 131 W. Mulberry in background, 1948, demolished between 1960-1980 for First Presbyterian Church parking, FCMOD, 127wmu48, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/7275/rec/1 Abner Loomis Residence, 405 Remington Street, 1886, demolished in 1980s for 460 S. College grocery store, (Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, H04094), https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/36547/rec/1, ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 36 William Drake Residence, 415 Remington Street, 1920, demolished in 1980s for 460 S. College grocery store. (FCMOD) H02742, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/34261/rec/3. H.D. Klinker Tire & Battery at 113 & 125 E. Oak St., demolished in the 1970s for parking, FCMOD, Ha1819, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/17510/rec/1. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 37 221 Remington St, 1906, demolished by the 1970s for parking, FCMOD, H09128, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/34243/rec/2 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 38 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 1 Historic Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME THE LINDEN, 360 LINDEN STREET – CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF Jim Bertolini, Senior Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: buildings, the larger of which will be mixed-use. The project includes approximately 2,500ft2 of commercial space and a total of 160 housing units. Of those 160 units, a submitted affidavit indicates 20%, or 32 units, will be affordable. APPLICANT/OWNER: CONSULTANT: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is forwarding this item to the HPC to provide a recommendation to the decision maker. Staff’s analysis is that most requirements of 5.8.1 appear met. Because this project includes affordable housing, it is processed as a Basic Development Review under City Code, a staff review process that typically does not include public meetings. For future reference, after the November 1, 2026, deadline for local governments to comply with the State of Colorado’s Proposition 123 fast track requirements for affordable housing projects, it will be more challenging to bring affordable housing projects like this to the HPC for recommendation to the decision maker. COMMISSION’S ROLE: Conceptual review is an optional first phase of the development review process when (non-Landmark) historic resources are on or near the development site, and is an opportunity for the applicant to discuss requirements, standards, design issues, and policies that apply to project with the Commission. Conceptual review of any proposed alteration may be limited to certain portions of the work as deemed appropriate by the Commission. The applicant is not required to have a conceptual review for development projects, and may proceed directly to final review and recommendation. Each application may be finally reviewed and decided upon by the Commission at the same meeting as the Commission’s conceptual review of the application or at a subsequent meeting. During final review, the Commission shall consider the application and any changes made by the applicant since conceptual review. The HPC may elect to move ahead to final development review at this hearing, and provide a formal recommendation to the decision-maker. Packet Pg. 39 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 2 BACKGROUND & PROJECT SUMMARY: This project proposal is for a 160-unit housing development with incorporated commercial space (totaling 2,473ft2 at this time) in two buildings. The project will demolish two buildings on the site that both date from the 1980s and are not of age to be considered for potential historic status. Staff (Planning and Preservation) have been working with the applicant team for several months on conceptual design. During initial staff conversations, this project did not have an Affordable Housing component. Since that time, as part of the formal submission, an Affidavit confirms that 20%, or thirty-two (32), of the units will be rented at affordable rates for 80% of the area median income (AMI). AREA OF ADJACENCY SUMMARY: The project is within the Downtown zone district, and has a portion of its proposed new construction within the Old Town Historic District, listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 1978. There are no known historic resources on the development site. However, the development site overlaps with the confirmed location of the original military fort, Fort Collins, during its brief operations. As part of the development, an archaeological monitor would be required during site work for Building 1 since the level of site disturbance is unknown. A Collections Agreement with the Museum of Discovery would need filed before permits for site work would be released, since the Museum is the repository for any inadvertent finds. Because of the location in the downtown area, there are several historic buildings within 200 feet of the development site. The primary references for the application of Land Use Code 5.8.1 for the protection of cultural resources have been identified as staff as the Union Pacific Freight Depot at 350 Linden Street, and the Harmony Mill at 131 E. Lincoln Avenue, since both directly abut the site. Below is a full list of historic buildings in the 200ft area of adjacency, with the two primary references bolded: - 350 Linden Street, Union Pacific Railroad Freight Depot, Listed (NRHP, Old Town Historic District) - 131 E. Lincoln Avenue, Harmony Mill, Listed (City Landmark) - 546 Willow Street, Lindell Mill, Ranch-Way Feed Mill, Listed (City Landmark) - 359 Linden Street, Poudre Valley Elevator Co./Northern Colorado Feeder’s Supply, Listed (NRHP, Old Town Historic District) - 404 Linden Street, Godinez Block/El Burrito, Eligible for designation as a City Landmark REVIEW CRITERIA AND INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT: For the purposes of this evaluation, staff has generally focused on compatibility with the abutting UPRR Freight Depot at 350 Linden Street for the Linden Street-facing elevation, and compatibility with the abutting Harmony Mill at 131 E. Lincoln Ave. for the Willow Street-facing elevation. Staff would note that with the inclusion of Affordable housing in this project, in the foreseeable future, projects like this may not be referred to the HPC once this review due to time constraints to reach a decision that will be required under new state laws. Staff would also note that this project falls within the applicable boundaries for the City’s River Downtown Redevelopment Zone District. A summary of Planning staff’s current evaluation of the project related to those, especially related to anticipated changes to the project that may occur before final approval, are included after the analysis table. Packet Pg. 40 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 3 Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis – In General Land Use Code 5.8.1(F)(1)(c) NOTE: This section has been completed by staff referencing the historic properties at 350 Linden Street (the UPRR Freight Depot) Complies/Does Not Comply Massing and Building Articulation 1. New construction shall be similar in width or, if larger, be articulated into massing reflective of the mass and scale of historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. Focusing on the north/Linden Street-facing elevation, the two-story base treatment includes a projection of similar size and scale as the Freight Depot, and then tapers forward to the street corner to the north. It appears articulated into massing reflective of the historic resources on the development site. Moving to the north/Willow-facing elevations, the two new buildings include articulation along the facades that is reflective of the Harmony Mill, especially regarding width at the street level. Brick sections referencing the Mill are interspersed with stucco sections referencing the Godinez Block/El Burrito. TBD (Staff Y) Massing and Building Articulation 2. In all zone districts, stepbacks must be located on new buildings to create gradual massing transitions at the same height or one story above the height of historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. Additionally, in the Downtown zone district, the widest portions of stepbacks required in the Downtown zone district stepback standard shall be on building portions closest to historic resources. This standard appears met. Relating to the Freight Depot, northern sections of building one include a step-back at the second story, one story above the one-story Depot. Moving to the Willow Street elevations, referencing the Harmony Mill, the intent of this Standard appears met, since the new building, at five stories, is only one story above the four-story Harmony Mill. TBD (Staff Y) Building Materials The lower story facades until any stepback (required or otherwise) must be constructed of authentic, durable, high quality materials (brick, stone, glass, terra cotta, stucco (non-EIFS), precast concrete, wood, cast iron, architectural metal) installed to industry standards. Staff finds the proposed materials for both buildings on their lower facades (brick, cement fiber flush horizontal siding, and cementitious stucco) appear to meet this standard. TBD (Staff Y) Packet Pg. 41 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 4 Building Materials New construction shall reference one or more of the predominate material(s) on historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley, by using at least two of the following to select the primary material(s) for any one to three story building, or the lower story facades until any stepbacks (required or otherwise): 1) type; 2) scale; 3) color; 4) three-dimensionality; 5) pattern. Both primary reference buildings are almost exclusively red brick masonry, making that the dominant material. This means the primary materials on the lower stories (before stepbacks) should reference red brick masonry in at least two of the above-listed ways. However, staff will acknowledge the presence of several different historic materials on nearby buildings, along with the need for articulation under Standard 1 above, and has considered that in our evaluation. The two “primary” materials on the lower stories appear to be red brick and cementitious stucco. The red brick clearly meets this Standard. The cementitious stucco is intended to reference the Godinez Block/El Burrito, a Landmark-eligible building to the north across Willow Street, as well as the Northern Colorado Feeder’s Supply building at 359 Linden Street. Based on the importance of those buildings to Fort Collins history, the complexity of corner building design, and the need for articulation on a large building served by the use of variable TBD (Staff Y) Fenestration Use at least one of the following: 1) similar window pattern; 2) similar window proportion of height to width; 3) similar solid-to-void pattern as found on historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. The two historic buildings have similar historic window treatments to serve as references. The Harmony Mill has six-over-six wood sash windows in singular, symmetrical locations, with concrete lintels and cut stone sills. The Freight Depot has singular nine-over-nine wood sash windows concentrated on the west street-facing portions of the building. On the west/Linden-facing elevations, banks of three 1x3 bronze- colored vinyl windows in metal storefront framing have been selected for lower elevations, with taller paired configurations for the apartments above. In most cases, it appears this Standard is met relative to option 2 for similar window proportion of height to width, although the Willow Street elevations include some larger picture windows that don’t appear to meet the Standard. Those are the minority of window units that will appear to public rights-of-way and are on upper-story elevations. TBD Design Details Use select horizontal or vertical reference lines or elements (such as rooflines, cornices, and bell courses) to relate the new construction to historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. Based on the submitted materials, it is difficult to determine if this TBD Packet Pg. 42 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 5 renderings of the proposed project that include the reference buildings in them to confirm compliance. Visibility of Historic Features New construction shall not cover or obscure character-defining architectural elements, such as windows or primary design features of historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. While distant views of the Harmony Mill and Lindell Mill/Ranch-Way Feeds will certainly be affected based on the large size and scale of the project, the visibility of these resources will not be obstructed as viewed from nearby rights-of-way (Linden [for the UPRR Freight Depot], Willow TBD (Staff Y) River Downtown Redevelopment Zone District Design Guidelines For the downtown area bounded by Jefferson Street, College Avenue, the Cache la Poudre River, and the southeast frontage of Lincoln Avenue, the City has specific standards and guidelines governing redevelopment projects contained within the Land Use Code and these guidelines. These guidelines acknowledge the historical relationships to agriculture and industry that much of this area had, and encourage infill design that relates to that tradition, while looking forward to a more dense, mixed use, downtown environment. Planning staff for the project have provided the following evaluation notes and requests related to primary Planning concerns with the 360 Linden Street / The Linden project. Preservation staff has provided some annotated notes regarding the interrelation of these River District guidelines and standards with the Historic Preservation section of the Land Use Code. These are provided to inform the HPC of design changes that are most likely between this stage of the design review and final approval. 1. Use of Lapsiding: Lap siding is largely inconsistent with the design vision established by the River District Redevelopment Plan. Please consider replacing the lap siding with corrugated metal or material more consistent with the ag-industrial character of the River District. a. Preservation staff would note that the applicant’s reference point for the use of lapsiding is the non-historic Confluence building at 401 Linden Street. That project used lapsiding to meet Historic Preservation compatibility requirements due to the abutting two historic residences (405 and 409 Linden St), from the former north Downtown neighborhood, a predominantly Hispanic neighborhood between the 1920s and 1980s that is now mostly demolished. 2. White Stucco Color: The overuse of white as the main body color is problematic due to high reflectivity. Explore muted gray tones like Sherwin Williams "Stamped Concrete" to align with the ag-industrial character of weathered steel and concrete. a. Preservation staff would note that the use of cement stucco is appropriate in this circumstance, due to its historic use on the Poudre Valley Feeders Supply building, Lindell Mill, and Godinez Block, all of which are non-abutting but within 200ft of the development site. Cement stucco meets the material compatibility requirements in LUC 5.8.1 as noted above, however, the use of a specific color is not required, since there are four other options for material compatibility met by matching the material, and only three options need met. Preservation requirements, in this case, are not in opposition to Planning’s design comment. 3. Primary Entrances: Regarding primary entrances, the building design fails to demonstrate a primary entrance facing the storefront street type and that is recognizable and distinguishable from secondary entrances. Consider swapping south and north corner designs. A chamfered edge design may be appropriate to better respond to the building being located at a street corner. Packet Pg. 43 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 6 4. Building Variation: Much of the River Subdistrict Standards and accompanying Guidelines focus on requiring architecture that is varied, interesting, is scaled to pedestrians, and respects the history and design vision of the River Subdistrict. There are currently [two] areas of concern, the two ends of the building that face the main drive into the site and the building edge that faces east. a. For the eastern most portion of the second building, enhance the architecture to address the lack of details. b. For the portions of the building facing the internal drive consider wrapping enhanced architectural features (such as the continuation of the brick facade) around both building corners, continuing halfway down the facade before articulating to stucco. Consider the use of awning or canopies per River District Design Guidelines (p. 63) and Downtown Land Use Code Standards. 5.8.1(F)(3): Plan of Protection Staff is requiring archaeological monitoring for the site work related to Building 1, due to its overlap with known building sites of the original Fort Collins military post from the 1860s. This will be documented via a Request for Collections Agreement with the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery who would be the repository for anything discovered during excavation work. Otherwise, a Plan of Protection covering incidentals will be required prior to the release of Building Permits as a contingency related to accidental damage during construction to the UPRR Freight Depot. SAMPLE MOTIONS Note: Although the HPC is considering this item as a conceptual matter at this time, the Commission may find that the application is sufficient to offer a final recommendation to the decision-maker for the development project at this time, rather than requiring the applicant to return a second time. Should the Commission choose to move forward to a final recommendation, it should first pass a motion to advance from conceptual design review to a final recommendation. In that event, these are sample motions for HPC consideration based on the possible recommendations available: Sample Motion for a Recommendation of Approval: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend to the Decision Maker approval of The Linden at 360 Linden Street, finding that the proposal complies with the design compatibility standards contained in Land Use Code section 5.8.1(F)(1)(c), Table 1., based on the findings in the staff report, the applicant materials and presentation, and information received at this hearing. The Commission finds specifically that with respect to: • Massing and building articulation of new construction: • Massing and building articulation stepbacks: • Authentic, durable, high quality building materials: • Building materials referencing the historic resource: • Fenestration: • Design details: • Visibility of historic features: [The Commission may elaborate on these basic findings, propose additional findings, or remove any of these proposed findings according to its evaluation]. Sample Motion for a Recommendation of Denial: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend to the Decision Maker denial of The Linden at 360 Linden Street, based on the following findings: • Massing and building articulation of new construction: • Massing and building articulation stepbacks: Packet Pg. 44 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 7 • Authentic, durable, high quality building materials: • Building materials referencing the historic resource: • Fenestration: • Design details: • Visibility of historic features: [The Commission may elaborate on these basic findings, propose additional findings, or remove any of these proposed findings according to its evaluation]. Sample Motion for a Continuance: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission continue this item to the next meeting to seek additional information regarding the following code requirements: [insert] [or insert other reasons for a continuing the item]. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Applicant Presentation w/ design info 2. Applicant Development Review Application 3. Staff Presentation Packet Pg. 45 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 46 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 47 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 48 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 49 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 50 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 51 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 52 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 53 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 54 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 55 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 56 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 57 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 58 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 59 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 60 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 61 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 62 – 281 N College Ave – Fort Collins, CO 80522,DRCoord@fcgov.com Site/Area Information Residential Area: ____________SF __________Acres Commercial Area: ____________SF __________Acres Industrial Area: ____________SF __________Acres Mixed Use Area: ____________SF __________Acres Right of Way Area: ____________SF __________Acres Parking and Drive Area: ____________SF __________Acres Stormwater Detention Area: ____________SF __________Acres Landscape Area: ____________SF __________Acres Open/Other Area: ____________SF __________Acres Gross Area: ____________SF __________Acres Floor Area Ratio: _______________________________________ Gross Density: _______________ Net Density: ________________ Owner Applicant Information Name: __________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________ City: ___________________________State: _____Zip: _________ Email:_____________________________Phone: ______________ Consultant Information Name/Contact: ___________________________________________ Organization Name: ______________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________ City: ___________________________State: _____Zip: _________ Email:_____________________________Phone: ______________ Project Information Project Type:__________ Project Name: _____________________________________________ Project Description: ________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ Location Description / Address / Parcel #: _____________________ _________________________________________________________ Major Cross Streets: _______________________________________ Zone District: _____________________________________________ Plat (Y/N): _____ Modifications (Y/N): _____ (#) _____ Redevelopment (Y/N): _____ Affordable Housing (Y/N): _____ (%) ______ Dates: Conceptual Review Meeting Date: ____________________________ CDR#______________ Neighborhood Meeting Date: ________________________________ Hearing Type: _____________________________________________ Building / Unit Information Residential: _____________________________________Square Feet Commercial: ____________________________________Square Feet Industrial: ______________________________________Square Feet Building Floor Area Ratio: _________________________________ Platted Area: ______________________________________________ Number of Units: Single-Family Attached:_______ Single-Family Detached:_______ CERTIFICATION I certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and authority of the owners of the real property, as those terms are defined in Section 1-2 of the City Code (including common areas legally connected to or associated with the property which is the subject of this application) without whose consent and authority the requested action could not lawfully be accomplished. Pursuant to said authority, I hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for the purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for posting of public notice on the property. Name (Please PRINT): _______________________________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone: _________________________________________Email:__________________________________________ :(and title showing authority to sign, if applicable) CERTIFICATION MUST BE SIGNED. The Linden .69 Mixed-use affordable housing .05 29,900 2473 9712213016 currently 360 Linden St. Linden St & Willow St Spencer Long - Realty Capital Residential 909 Lake Carolyn Parkway, Suite 150 Irving TX 75039 spencer@realtycapital.com 469-533-4119 Tenae Beane Ripley Design 236 Linden St, Suite A Fort Collins CO 80524 tenae.beane@ripleydesigninc.com 970-224-5828 BDR ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 63 Revised 10/2/2023 2 Development Review Application Please indicate the type of application submitted by checking the box preceding the appropriate request(s). Additional handouts are available explaining the submittal requirements for each of the following review processes. REQUESTED ZONE: ____________________________ Fee $5,825 REQUESTED ZONE: _____________________________ Fee $4,800 Fee: $54,475 Fee: $11,150 Fee: $27,675 Fee: $21,575 Fee: $16,900 Fee: $2,300 subdivision only, no land use approvals Fee: $18,975 Fee: $1,500.00 Fee: $13,625 Fee: $2,025 per unit Fee: $3,500 Fee: $1,675 ea. standalone Fee: $000 Fee: $,000 NO FEE Fee: $3,000 charged once for projects that require 4 or more rounds of review City of Fort Collins Development Review collects Poudre Fire Authority Development Review Fees for the above requests. Applicable Poudre Fire Authority Fees would apply at the time of application. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 64 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 65 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 66 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 67 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 68 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 69 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 70 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 71 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 72 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 73 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 74 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 75 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 76 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 77 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 78 Agreement Owner City Effective Date Property Exhibit A Project Incentives Period of Affordability ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 79 Affordability Restriction ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 80 Mailing Address ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 81 Hand Delivery Mailing Address Hand Delivery [Signature pages follow.] ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 82 Headline Copy Goes Here June 18, 2025Senior Historic Preservation Planner Jim Bertolini The Linden, 360 Linden St: Conceptual Development Review Headline Copy Goes Here 2 HPC Role •Conceptual Review – Provide initial design feedback under LUC 5.8.1 •Final Review - Provide a recommendation to the decision maker (Community Development Director) regarding compliance with Section 5.8.1 of the land use code. 1 2 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 83 Headline Copy Goes HereProject Summary 3 •Mixed Office/Commercial ‒ 5 stories ‒ 164 ft at parapet ‒ 1 commercial space on ground floor (Linden St) ‒ 160 units ‒ 32 affordable ‒80% of AMI Headline Copy Goes HereSite 4 Historic Area of Adjacency (200ft) 3 4 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 84 Headline Copy Goes HereNearby Historic Buildings – Primary Buildings (abutting) 5 • Union Pacific Railroad Freight Depot • Listed in NRHP (Old Town HD, 1978) • Built 1910-1911 • Freight service until 1975 • Included some regional/Amtrak passenger service in last few years • Various businesses including New Belgium brewing 1994-1996 • Since then, has been a construction materials yard (Cotlier Construction and now Mawson Lumber) • Harmony Mill • Landmarked 1994 • Built 1886 • Built by the Farmers’ Protective Association, primarily for grain processing • Closed by 1901 due to poor financial management • Served many functions since, including a local grocer, and now an art collective (Petrichor) UPRR Depot, 2021 Harmony Mill, 2019 (L) and 1969 (B) Headline Copy Goes HereNearby Historic Buildings – Secondary (non-abutting) 6 • Lindell Mill / Ranch-WayFeeds, 546 Willow St. • Landmarked 1994 • Built 1869, with major updates/expansions in 1887, and 1966 • Godinez Block, El Burrito,404 Linden St. • Built 1947 • No up-to-date determination, but likely Eligible • Hispanic Heritage & Godinez family • Poudre Valley Feeder’sSupply, 359 Linden St. • Listed in NRHP 1978 (Old Town HD) • Built 1911 • Various iterations of grain processing, including livestock feed, since construction • Switched to restaurant in mid-2010s From L to R, Rocky Mountain Grain & Coal, Harmony Mill, and Lindell Mill, c.1910 Godinez Block, 404 Linden, 2021 Poudre Valley Feeder’s Supply, 359 Linden St. Lindell Mill, 2018 5 6 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 85 Headline Copy Goes HereProposed Site Plan 7 Headline Copy Goes HereElevations – Building 1 (West) 8 7 8 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 86 Headline Copy Goes HereElevations – Building 2 (East) 9 Headline Copy Goes Here 10 Concepts 9 10 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 87 Headline Copy Goes HereLUC 5.8.1(F) Item #1, Width & Massing – Staff Analysis 11 • Linden St - Approx 112ft wide (articulated into 36ft to 48ft sections • Willow St – Approx 330ft wide (articulated into 50ft & 36ft sections) •Staff Analysis: Met; façade massing broken up into similarheight and width as historic mill and/or freight depot • 350 Linden St. – Approx 42ft wide (Linden St) • 131 E Lincoln Ave. – Approx 50ft wide (Willow St) Headline Copy Goes Here 12 LUC 5.8.1(F) Item #2, Stepback – Staff Analysis • Staff Analysis: Appears met in both directions • Toward UPRR Freight Depot, two stories, slightly above historic building (one story above) • Toward Harmony Mill, 5 stories (one story above) 11 12 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 88 Headline Copy Goes Here 13 LUC 5.8.1(F) Item #3, Durable Materials – Staff Analysis • Staff analysis: Appears met • Brick, cement stucco (non-EIFS), are listed as approved • Cement fiber siding recommended for approval on recent projects (300 E Mountain, 220 E Oak) Headline Copy Goes Here 14 LUC 5.8.1(F) Item #4, Dominant Materials – Staff Analysis • Staff analysis: Appears met •Note: Only applies up to stepbacks • Dominant historic material for primary references is red brick • Dominant historic material for secondary references is light/white concrete stucco and painted brick • Primary new material below stepbacks is brick and dement stucco •Brick meets this •Non-EIFS cement stucco appears to meet this 13 14 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 89 Headline Copy Goes Here 15 LUC 5.8.1(F) Item #5, Windows/Fenestration – Staff Analysis • Only 1 option needs met • In most cases, similar proportions from either Harmony Mill or Freight Depot appear incorporated • Exception appears to be larger picture/patio- size windows on upper stories • Staff Analysis: Proportion option (height to width) appears met (mostly) Headline Copy Goes Here 16 LUC 5.8.1(F) Item #6, Horizontal/Vertical Alignment – Staff Analysis • Staff Analysis: Potentially met • Horizontal features are incorporated, although they don’t visually align • Replication of concrete sills • Use of banding and cornicing along brick sections 15 16 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 90 Headline Copy Goes Here 17 LUC 5.8.1(F) Item #7, Visibility – Staff Analysis • Staff Analysis: Appears met • Primary perspectives of concern are Linden Street (for the freight depot), and Lincoln Avenue (for the Harmony Mill) • UPRR Depot & Linden?: No concerns – setbacks and alley appear adequate to achieve this • Harmony Mill & Lincoln?: No concerns – however, prominence of the Harmony Mill as currently viewed from Linden will be diminished Headline Copy Goes Here 18 Planning Staff – River District Guidelines & Main Concerns • Use of lapsiding (cement fiber) • White stucco color • Primary entrances • Building Variation and corners/sides 17 18 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 91 Headline Copy Goes Here 19 HPC Requests for Information -Interpretation in area? -Archaeological monitoring process? N corner – Ft Collins/Military E corner – Arapahoe/Native S corner – Native Pre-Contact / River W corner – Industrial History Headline Copy Goes Here 20 Potential Discussion questions • Are the window compatibility requirements adequately met or could they be improved by dividing larger windows to better reflect the tall, narrow proportions of the abutting historic building windows? • Are the horizontal and vertical references between the proposed and historic buildings or do they need adjusted to align more precisely? • Does the overall project meet the requirements of LUC 5.8.1 for design compatibility? 19 20 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 92 Headline Copy Goes Here 21 Public comments • As of 6/3 – none Headline Copy Goes Here 22 HPC Role •Conceptual Review – Provide initial design feedback under LUC 5.8.1 •Final Review - Provide a recommendation to the decision maker (Community Development Director) regarding compliance with Section 5.8.1 of the land use code. 21 22 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 93 Headline Copy Goes Here 23 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 94 Agenda Item 5 Item 5, Page 1 Historic Preservation Commission ITEM NAME CLAY FAMILY HISTORY PRESENTATION – IN HONOR OF JUNETEENTH STAFF Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager INFORMATION Juneteenth is a federal, state, and local holiday that commemorates June 19, 1865, when Major General Gordon Granger led Union soldiers into Galveston, Texas, bringing news that slavery in the United States had ended by executive decree. In 2025, the City of Fort Collins will recognize the Juneteenth holiday on Thursday, June 19 by closing all City offices. The free community Juneteenth celebration will take place at the Foothills Mall on Friday, June 20 and Saturday, June 21 at Foothills Mall. The event is presented by the Black Professionals Network, in collaboration with the Foothills Mall, the City of Fort Collins, and United Way of Larimer County. Event information is at https://www.focojuneteenth.com/. In honor of Juneteenth, Meg Dunn, Vice President of Historic Larimer County, will present her research on a formerly enslaved early Fort Collins resident, Charlie Clay, and his family. Clay was an early Northern Colorado pioneer and the first African American to settle in what became Larimer County. His story is full of adventure, tribulations, and an entrepreneurial spirit. Meg Dunn has been fascinated by Charlie’s story ever since she first heard of him, and she is eager to share his tales of daring do, brushes with fame, and his all-around congenial spirit. The presentation will also delve into how we preserve and continue to share stories like these over time, particularly when the associated places have been lost. ATTACHMENTS 1. Mark Miller photo of Charlie Clay Packet Pg. 95 “Charley Clay - aka Charles H. Clay; Charlie Clay; Charles Clay.” Charles H. Clay, African-American pioneer of Fort Collins. Same image as M00046. Printed on negative: "Chas. H. Clay came to Fort Collins in fall of 1869 or spring of 1870. He had been in emply of army officers at Fort Laramie after close of Civil War. Shortly after coming to Fort Collins he married Annie Garland. 3 sons and 3 daughters were born to this union. All were residents of this city for many years. Both parents died here. Chas. served as cook at opening of Tedmon House in 1878. He, with his horse.. .[portion cut off]...ash and rubbish hauler. Died Aug. 31, 1910." FCMOD, Photo by Mark Miller, H00046, Historical Collection, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ph/id/13826/rec/1. Packet Pg. 96