Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/19/2025 - Active Modes Advisory Board - AGENDA - Regular meetingActive Modes Advisory Board REGULAR MEETING May 19, 2025 – 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. 281 N College Ave. Zoom – See Link Below 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. AGENDA REVIEW 4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (3 min per participant) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Memo to Council re: Strategic Trails Plan (review draft) | Bruce Henderson (15 minutes) (ACTION) Participation for this Active Modes Advisory Board Meeting will be in person at 281 N College Ave. You may also join online via Zoom, using this link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88164942985?pwd=6ITv5XeAgdPAlt2Xb3K4zJEXbebgrG.1 Online Public Participation: The meeting will be available to join beginning at 5:55 p.m., March 17, 2025. Participants should try to sign in prior to the 6:00 p.m. meeting start time, if possible. For public comments, the Chair will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Board or Commission. To Participate: • Use a laptop, computer, or internet-enabled smartphone. (Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio). • You need to have access to the internet. • Keep yourself on muted status. Provide Comments Via Email Individuals who are uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or participate by phone are encouraged to participate by emailing comments to lnagle@fcgov.com at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. If your comments are specific to any of the discussion items on the agenda, please indicate that in the subject line of your email. Staff will ensure your comments are provided to the Active Modes Advisory Board. Active Modes Advisory Board REGULAR MEETING 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Revisit of shared micromobility regulatory framework | Rachel Ruhlen (15 min) (ACTION) b. Northern Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization’s 2025 Coordinated Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan | Aaron Hull (30 min) (INFORM, INPUT) c. Restructuring Board Member Reports | Kat Steele (5 min) (INFORM, INPUT) 8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS a. Kat Steele 9. STAFF LIASON REPORT a. Council Six Month Agenda Planning Calendar b. June: Bike Month in Colorado 10. ADJOURNMENT ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING –REGULAR April 21, 2025 6:00 p.m. Online via Zoom or In Person at 281 North College 4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 1 FOR REFERENCE: Chair: Bruce Henderson Vice-Chair: Kat Steele Staff Liaison: Lauren Nagle 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Henderson called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. 2. ROLL CALL BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Bruce Henderson, Chair Kat Steele, Vice Chair Wallace Jacobson Cameron Phillips Kevin Krause Kristina Vrouwenvelder Jared Hanson Tim Han Humphrey Costello CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lauren Nagle DK Kemp Nell Davis ABSENT: PUBLIC PRESENT: None 3. AGENDA REVIEW Chair Henderson outlined the published agenda. 4. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION None. ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 2 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MARCH 2025 Han made a motion, seconded by Hanson, to approve the minutes of the March 2025 meeting. The motion was adopted unanimously. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Welcome New Member: Humphrey Costello Current members and new member Humphrey Costello introduced themselves and commented on their interest in active modes. b. Board Chair and Vice Chair Elections Chair Henderson stated he is interested in continuing as Chair. Han made a motion, seconded by Steele, to re-elect Bruce Henderson as Chair. The motion was adopted unanimously. Chair Henderson noted Vice Chair Krause is not interested in continuing to serve in the role and discussed the role of the Vice Chair. Steele expressed interest in the Vice Chair role. Hansen made a motion, seconded by Jacobson, to elect Kat Steele as Vice Chair. The motion was adopted unanimously. c. Strategic Trails Plan – Dave ‘DK’ Kemp Dave ‘DK’ Kemp, Project Manager, outlined the Strategic Trails Plan’s alignment with Council priorities, including advancing the 15 -minute city by accelerating the shift to active modes, reducing climate and air pollution, and Vision Zero. He discussed the timeline for the project and stated the Plan is currently slated to go before Council for adoption on May 20th. Kemp discussed the public outreach main themes, including trails for all, community connections, interconnected network, and compliment the on-street network. He outlined the map of the proposed new trail connections which strives to connect to underrepresented areas and create recreational loops within the city. He stated the full build out will include 108 miles of trail with 71 over/underpasses. Kemp discussed the lifecycle of a trail project, which includes maintenance over time, and discussed the three trail types: major, minor, and spur/connector. He outlined the guiding principles for the plan, including community input, 15 -minute city, conservation and resilience, recreational experience, and demand and growth. Additionally, Kemp discussed the project prioritization criteria which ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 3 include equity, connectivity to schools, recreation value, demand and growth, completing gaps in the system, and synergy and ease of implementation. Kemp outlined eligible and potential trail funding sources and noted each mile of trail costs about $1.8 million including planning and design. He stated the forecast is for the development of about 1.5 miles of trail per year on average unless it could be accelerated with additional funding , potentially from the CCIP tax. Chair Henderson asked how the CCIP funding allocation is determined. Kemp replied Council makes the decision as to which projects are part of the package for funding by the tax, which is set to be on the November ballot for renewal. Kemp discussed the trails safety strategy, which includes an education multimedia campaign, refreshed courtesy and etiquette signs, trial widening, centerline striping, warning signs at bridges, underpasses, and junctions, and Bicycle Ambassador Program routine trail pop-up events. Kemp requested a letter of recommendation from the Board for the Strategic Trails Plan. Han asked if there are competing interests in terms of trail signage given that additional signage may make the trails seem more like a roadway whereas less signage may make them feel more recreational. Kemp replied that does exist and stated we are moving from a town that has embraced trails as being a recreational facility only to more of a transportation facility. Vice Chair Steele asked if the Plan only includes city limits. Kemp replied it includes the entire growth management area. Vice Chair Steele asked how long build out is expected to take. Kemp replied the next 22 miles of trail will take 15 years to complete with current funding levels. Hanson asked what can be done to make the Strategic Trails Plan and its projects more appealing to attract funds. Kemp replied a letter of support from the Board to Council would be meaningful. Costello asked where data on trail use and accidents can be found. Kemp provided trail user data from 2022-2024. Krause stated the extended timeline for completion of the trails system is difficult. He asked if there has been any thought given to establishing a corridor with single track or a gravel trail first. Kemp replied the trails in the northeast part of town are contingent upon approved developments; however, there are other areas that already have gravel that may be the right surface , including areas along canals that would require a public access easement. Krause stated he has heard that people may be interested in a multi-surface approach. ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 4 Kemp noted Natural Areas typically does not build a lot of hard surface trails, though Parks sometimes builds paved trails through Natural Areas. Vrouwenvelder asked if there is a place where the proposed on-street bike lane improvements and Strategic Trails Plan can be seen together. Kemp replied all online maps have both components of existing and proposed on -street and trail facilities. Kemp noted the Board could place a letter in Council’s read before packet. He summarized the comments from other Boards as being primarily positive. Costello asked about trail safety data. Kemp replied there is more of an issue around perceived safety rather than actual safety. He noted crashes resulting in severe injury are extremely rare, though there are likely many crashes that go unreported. He also noted State of Colorado traffic crash reports are not filed on trails, though Fort Collins Police do file incident reports if called. Kemp noted a big part of the education campaign will be around creating a culture of safety. Vrouwenvelder made a motion, seconded by Han, to write a letter in support of the Strategic Trails Plan. The motion was adopted unanimously. d. School Traffic Safety Inspection Program – Nell Davis Nell Davis, Traffic Operations Technical Project Manager, noted the city’s population and traffic patterns have changed a great deal since most schools were built, and safety improvements of the past are not necessarily serving schools well now. Davis stated a consultant was engaged in 2022 to develop the School Traffic Safety Inspection Program inspection process and a tool kit of improvements and best practices to apply. Davis noted the goal of the program is to conduct a systematic inspection of all aspects of transportation and all travel modes at each school to identify strengths and weaknesses and make recommendations in a number of categories. Davis stated the process starts each fall with meetings at identified schools, observations of pick-up and drop-off periods, traffic studies of corridors and intersections around the school, and inventories of the signs and pavement markings. Following the data collection piece, recommendations are made in a number of categories, including education, enforcement, maintenance, infrastructure, and operational changes. Davis stated maintenance and minor improvement recommendations are implemented the summer following the inspection and education, operation, and enforcement changes are coordinated with school staff and Police and grant funding or other opportunities are sought for larger projects. ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 5 Davis stated studies have been completed at six elementary schools and one middle school, and there are about 50 schools in the city. Davis outlined the recommendations provided for Zach Elementary and Lopez Elementary and stated this school year, two elementary schools, two middle schools, and one high school are being evaluated. Four elementary schools have been tentatively chosen to be evaluated next year. Davis outlined the criteria for prioritizing the schools and stated it is estimated that all schools will be evaluated by 2034, and then the process will begin again. Davis requested input from the Board in terms of making the program more efficient and in possibly getting feedback from students. Chair Henderson asked if there has been any discussion about partnering with Safe Routes to School to implement some of the safety improvements. Davis replied they work with the City’s Safe Routes to School coordinator quite a bit, particularly in the education realm. Phillips stated student input would be valuable and noted there are various surveys students receive annually. Vice Chair Steele asked what kinds of things have changed since schools were built. Davis replied the volume of traffic has grown and several schools that have been studied thus far are at or over capacity. Additionally, some schools have a larger portion of private vehicles than they may originally have had as a neighborhood school given families can opt in to any school. Costello asked if there are generalizations that can be made about issues that are common with many schools. Davis replied each school is different; however, there are issues with U-turns at most schools, though the amount it is a problem can vary. Davis noted reports go out to all principals and the school district and there is hope that some of the lessons learned at Rocky Mountain High School can be applied to other high schools. Vrouwenvelder stated one universal safety improvement could be encouraging schools to have fewer cars in parking lots and asked if there are recommendations for carpooling or active modes integration. Davis replied carpooling has not been addressed, but there are some walking ‘school bus’ programs that parents have started. Davis noted much of what comes out of the reports are safety improvements for bicyclists and pedestrians, and it is hoped that installing those improvements will encourage additional cyclists and pedestrians. Han noted Safe Routes to School cannot advocate for walking ‘buses’ or biking ‘buses’ due to liability issues. Krause suggested the City or School District might be able to help with walking or biking ‘bus’ programs as the liability is currently on the parents who participate. ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 6 Jacobson suggested surveying older students and questioned how their opinions would differ from parents in terms of increasing active modes. Steele stated student input should be a critical part of this effort and suggested focusing on the highest grade at each school to gather feedback. Steele asked if there are different considerations or priorities for elementary, middle, and high schools. Davis replied the priorities are the same, though each level provides different challenges, including student drivers at high schools, more independent riders and walkers at middle schools, and more drop-off situations at elementary schools. Vrouwenvelder concurred students may have interesting insights, but suggested sampling across grades particularly in high school to ensure people with and without drivers’ licenses are surveyed. Costello noted youth are a protected class and there are many steps that need to be taken to survey them and suggested Davis may want to go through another entity that already has the structure established to do survey work. 8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS Jacobson commented on the Centre Avenue flexible delineators between the drive and bike lanes. He stated users have reported feeling safer. Krause noted the civic assembly process for the Hughes Stadium property has started. Chair Henderson noted Kelly Smith, who spoke at last month’s meeting on the Natural Areas Strategic Framework, has requested a letter of support to Council from the Board. Krause stated this alignment between the Natural Areas Strategic Framework and the AMAB seems a bit too peripheral. Nagle noted there will not be time prior to Council consideration of the Framework to draft a memo at another meeting. No members made a motion to send a memo of support to Council. Chair Henderson stated that while the Framework is a good plan, there isn’t a tight link between the plan at the goals of the Active Modes Advisory Board. 9. STAFF LIAISON REPORT Nagle mentioned the Centre Avenue bike lanes. 10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:01 p.m. FC Moves 200 W Mountain Ave Suite A PO Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522 970-221-6705 rruhlen@fcgov.com MEMORANDUM Date: May 19, 2025 To: Active Modes Advisory Board From: Rachel Ruhlen, Transportation Planner Subject: Shared Micromobility Code Changes BOTTOM LINE We are seeking an updated recommendation from the Active Modes Advisory Board on establishing a regulatory framework for shared micromobility services. BACKGROUND On November 18, 2024, the Active Modes Advisory Board recommended requiring shared micromobility services to have a permit and enter into a contract with the City of Fort Collins in order to operate in the City, because the issue was to be considered by City Council soon after. However, the item was re-worked internally and rescheduled for Council consideration. Staff revised the ordinance to require shared micromobility services to have a services contract with the City but would not require services to obtain a separate outdoor vendor license or encroachment permits for such operations, since all necessary requirements would be addressed in the services contract. Because the November recommendation from the Active Modes Advisory Board recommended requiring a contract and a permit, we are seeking an updated recommendation aligned with the proposed ordinance language requiring a contract but not a permit (see attachment). NEXT STEPS Sample motion: “I move that the Active Moves Advisory Board recommend that Council adopt the proposed Code changes to establish a regulatory framework for shared micromobility services operating in the City of Fort Collins as presented in the materials for this meeting.” City Code Amendments Regarding Shared Micromobility Operations Section 1. That Section 15-381 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is amended to read as follows: Sec. 15-381. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this Article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section: . . . Linden Street shall mean that portion of Linden Street bounded on the south by the northern edge of the Walnut Street right-of-way and on the north by the southern edge of the Jefferson Street right-of-way. Micromobility Device shall mean any motor-powered or human-powered vehicular unit, including, but not limited to, bicycles, electrical assisted bicycles and electric scooters, or similar apparatuses. Low power scooters, golf carts, and motor vehicles, as those devices are defined in the Fort Collins Traffic Code, shall not be considered shared micromobility devices. Mobile food truck shall mean a motorized wheeled vehicle or towed wheeled vehicle designed and equipped to serve food. Mobile food truck shall include both "hot trucks," upon which food is cooked and prepared for vending, and "cold trucks," from which only commissary-prepared, ready-to-eat or packaged foods in individual servings are handled. . . . Outdoor vendor or vendor shall mean any person, whether as owner, agent, consignee or employee, who sells or attempts to sell, or who offers to the public free of charge, any services, goods, wares or merchandise, including, but not limited to, food or beverage, from any outdoor location, except that outdoor vendor shall not include a person who: . . . (10) Vends outdoor transportation services as a public utility under a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission; or (11) Vends food or catering services at an individual private residence for a private event; or (12) Vends shared micromobility services pursuant to § 15-395, below. . . . Outdoor vendor of transportation services shall mean an outdoor vendor (not regulated by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission and not exempt from the definition of outdoor vendor) who offers transportation services to the public. Outdoor vendor of transportation services shall include, but not be limited to, vendors of valet parking services; transportation services by pedal power such as pedi-cab or conference bicycle services; horse-drawn carriage rides; or other means of transportation service offered for hire. . . . Ready-to-eat food shall mean food that is edible and that is in the form in which it is reasonably expected to be consumed without further washing, cooking or additional preparation. Shared micromobility service shall mean a service that makes privately-owned micromobility devices available for use by the public, with the intent that the devices will at times remain in the public right-of-way or other permitted areas when not actively rented or used. This includes all such services, whether or not the micromobility devices are owned and managed as part of a fleet, and whether or not public access is managed through the use of integrated on-board technology or software applications. Special vending license shall mean a temporary outdoor vendor license issued pursuant to Subsection 15-382(c) below for outdoor vending at an occasional, temporary event located solely on a single private lot when the event does not require the issuance of a special events permit under Chapter 23.5 of this Code, which event may include, without limitation, a food truck rally. . . . Section 2. That Chapter 15, Article XIV of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is amended by the addition of a new Section 15-395 which reads in its entirety as follows: Sec. 15-395. Shared Micromobility. (a) The operation of shared micromobility services, as defined in § 15-381 above, within the City of Fort Collins is prohibited unless pursuant to a services contract with the City pursuant to Chapter 8, Article IV of this Code. (b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Code of the City of Fort Collins and any rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, a person operating a shared micromobility service pursuant to a services contract with the City need not obtain any license otherwise required under this Article in order to operate such service. (c) The operation of shared micromobility services and devices must comply with all applicable provisions of the Fort Collins Traffic Code. A person that owns or operates shared micromobility services is responsible for ensuring all micromobility devices in its fleet are parked in compliance with the Fort Collins Traffic Code when not being actively rented or used. Section 3. That Section 23-81 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is amended to read as follows: Sec. 23-81. Permit required; application. Any person desiring to place or erect a building, fence, barrier, post or other encroachments within any City-owned property or any street, avenue, alley, sidewalk, highway or public right- of-way in the City shall file a written application for a permit upon a form prepared and provided by the City. The provisions of this Division shall not apply to special events as defined in § 23.5-2 of this Code or to parking spaces as regulated by § 23-61 et seq., above, or to shared micromobility services operated pursuant to § 15-395 of this Code. 2025 COORDINATED PLAN Fort Collins Active Modes Advisory Board May 19, 2025 2 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Introduction Aaron Hull Mobility Planner 3 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Presentation Overview 1.Introduction & Presentation Overview 2.Background on NFRMPO & Mobility Program 3.Overview of the RideNoCo Program 4.2025 Coordinated Plan Background, Demographics, & Transit Availability 5.2025 Coordinated Plan Gaps in Service, Example Strategies, & Public Survey 6.2025 Coordinated Plan Discussion 7.Conclusion 4 Coordinated Plan - LCMC North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization (NFRMPO) •Regional transportation & air quality planning agency •Formed in 1988 and expanded to current boundaries in 2007 •Over 549,000 people •Covers about 675 sq. mi. •Parts of 2 counties and 13 communities •Greeley Urbanized Area (UZA) & Fort Collins Transportation Management Area (TMA) •Mobility Program – ALL of Weld and Larimer Counties 5 Coordinated Plan - LCMC NFRMPO Mobility Program •RideNoCo – One-Call/One-Click Center •Information Hub – website & call center •MyWayToGo – Trip Planning Platform •SchoolPooling tool •Data for Planning Processes •Mobility Committees •Joint Northern Colorado Mobility Committee •Larimer County Mobility Committee •Weld County Mobility Committee •Subrecipient Program & Technical Assistance •Connecting partners to State and Federal Funding •Coordinating service expansions in areas where gaps have been identified •Outreach, Education, and Community Engagement •Planning Efforts •Coordinated Public Transit/Human Services Transportation Plan •Mobility Action Plan (MAP) to guide implementation of Coordinated Plan •Updated every 4 years; Currently being updated in 2025 •“Angel Fund” idea for an emergency fund for one-time trips •RideAlliance & RideNoCo Partnership •Strategize for Multi -Partner Coordination and Transportation Management Organizations services •Feedback to other NFRMPO Planning Processes 6 Coordinated Plan - LCMC RideNoCo Program RideNoCo embodies two overarching goals: 1.Improving individual mobility for older adults, individuals with disabilities, individuals with a lower income, and people who do not speak English as a first language. 2.Improving regional mobility through enhanced coordination and collaboration among regional public and private transportation providers, especially in rural areas of Larimer & Weld counties. 7 Coordinated Plan - LCMC RideNoCo Website & Call Center RideNoCo Webpage (970) 514-3636 Monday – Friday 8 am to 5 pm Callback within one business day Over-the-phone interpretation in 100+ Languages through LanguageLink 8 Coordinated Plan - LCMC RideNoCo Call Center & Website Stats Year Calls/Emails Website Visits 2021 94 772 2022 143 1,986 2023 261 3,865 2024 368 4,968 Total 866 11,591 2025 year to date 128 2,038 9 Coordinated Plan - LCMC 2025 Coordinated Plan Background •Updated every four years. •Mobility for older adults, individuals with disabilities, low - income persons, and underserved communities •Sets up project priorities for the next 5 – 10 years •Allows for projects to be funded by FTA §5310 funds •Example: RideNoCo program •Strategic plan for Coordinated Transit (Mobility) in the region •Four Parts of the Plan: •Analyze existing conditions/options; •Evaluating socioeconomic and ridership data; •Identify mobility gaps; and •Strategize improvements 10 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Older Adult Population (2023 - 2045) 2023 Older Adult Population Population Larimer County (all) Weld County (all) NFRMPO Region Total Population 363,561 340,711 549,237 60 and Above 82,228 62,419 91,014 Percent of total population 22.62%18.32%16.57% Source: 2023 ACS 2045 Older Adult Population Population Larimer County (all) Weld County (all) NFRMPO Region Total Population 506,604 634,300 906,510 60 and Above 130,155 125,752 163,594 Percent of total population 25.7%19.8%18.0% Source: DOLA, NFRMPO LUAM 11 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Individuals with Disabilities (2023) Population Larimer County (all)Weld County (all)NFRMPO Region Total Noninstitutionalized Population 360,991 338,632 473,109 Percent with Disability 10.3%11.3%11.0% Percent Under 18 with Disability 4.7%6%1% Percent 18-64 with Disability 16.4 %18.6%6% Percent 65+ with Disability 59%74.7%4% Source: 2023 ACS 12 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Regional Public Transportation Availability in the Region Estes Park: The Peak 13 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Volunteer & Non-Profit Transportation Services Availability in the Region •Fort Collins •Loveland •Berthoud •Estes Park •Carbon Valley •Weld County •Weld County 14 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Gaps in Service •New Neighborhoods not served by transit •Between communities •Rural areas need more support •Affordable transportation •Funding is very limited, so service is limited •Awareness/Outreach (RideNoCo, Poudre Express, Bustang, 60+ Ride, United Way, Etc.) 15 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Example Strategies •The Weld County, Larimer County, and Joint Northern Colorado Mobility Committees •Technical assistance •Vehicle purchases •Grant reporting, writing, and management •Letters of support •Outreach, Marketing, and Education •Rider’s Guides and other informational material •RideNoCo expansion and optimization •MyWaytoGo platform •TDS System 16 Coordinated Plan - LCMC 2025 Coordinated Plan Public Survey 2025 Coordinated Plan Public Survey You can take the 2025 Coordinated Plan Public Survey at the following link: https://arcg.is/1rirDP0 or using the QR code below. 17 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Discussion Questions •Who needs to be involved in this conservation? •Are there any groups or individuals you recommend contacting for this discussion? •What are the mobility gaps you or your clients have noticed? •What projects, ideas, and/or strategies would be helpful to address these mobility gaps? •Any other questions, comments, or suggestions? 18 Coordinated Plan - LCMC Thank you! Connect with the RideNoCo Team! Aaron Hull Mobility Planner ahull@nfrmpo.org (970) 672-0677 Tanya Trujillo-Martinez Mobility Director ttrujillo -martinez@nfrmpo.org (970) 999-0072 Lisa Deaton Mobility Specialist ldeaton@nfrmpo.org (970) 300-1076 2025 Coordinated Plan Public Survey RideNoCo 8 am - 5 pm, Monday-Friday mobility@nfrmpo.org (970) 514-3636 RideNoCo Website Transportation empowers freedom, giving everyone the ability to live, wo rk, an d explore without limits. This survey is part of the North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization's public involvement in creating the 2025 Coordinated Plan. The 2025 Coordinated Plan brings together representatives from the public, human service agencies, and transit agencies to set strategies, goals, and objectives for the next four years. It focuses on mobility for older adults, individuals with disabilities, low-income adults, and underserved communities. It also considers mobility in all its forms, so it aims to look holistically and support the public, providers, advocates, and stakeholders in improving at all levels. Please provide Public Feedback at the below QR code: Please contact Aaron Hull, Mobility Planner at the North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization, with any questions or comments at (970) 672-0677 or ahull@nfrmpo.org. 2025 COORDINATED PLAN PUBLIC FEEDBACK SURVEY El transporte empodera la libertad, brindando a todos la capacidad d e vivir, trabajar y explorar sin límites. Esta encuesta es parte de la p articipación p ública d e la Organización Metropolitana de Planificación d e la Franja Norte del Frente en la creación d el Plan Coordinado 2025. El Plan Coordinado 2025 reúne a representantes del público, age ncias de servicios humanos y agencias de transporte para establecer estrategias, metas y objetivos para los próximos cuatro años. Se centra en la movilidad de los adultos mayores, personas con discapacidades, adultos de bajos ingresos y comunidades desatendidas. También considera la movilidad en todas sus formas, por lo que tie ne como objetivo un enfoque integral y apoyar al público, proveedores, defensores y partes interesadas en mejorar a todos los niveles. Por favor , proporcione su retroalimentación pública en el código QR a continuación: Por favor, contacta a Aaron Hull, Planificador de Movilidad en la North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization, para cualquier pregunta o comentario al (970) 672-0677 o ahull@nfrmpo.org. ENCUESTA DE RETROALIMENTACIÓN PÚBLICA DEL PLAN COORDINADO 2025