HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/19/2025 - Active Modes Advisory Board - AGENDA - Regular meetingActive Modes Advisory Board
REGULAR MEETING
May 19, 2025 – 6:00 to 8:00 p.m.
281 N College Ave.
Zoom – See Link Below
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. AGENDA REVIEW
4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (3 min per participant)
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Memo to Council re: Strategic Trails Plan (review draft) | Bruce
Henderson (15 minutes) (ACTION)
Participation for this Active Modes Advisory Board Meeting will be in person at 281 N
College Ave.
You may also join online via Zoom, using this link:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88164942985?pwd=6ITv5XeAgdPAlt2Xb3K4zJEXbebgrG.1
Online Public Participation:
The meeting will be available to join beginning at 5:55 p.m., March 17, 2025. Participants
should try to sign in prior to the 6:00 p.m. meeting start time, if possible. For public comments,
the Chair will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to
speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an
opportunity to address the Board or Commission.
To Participate:
• Use a laptop, computer, or internet-enabled smartphone. (Using earphones with a
microphone will greatly improve your audio).
• You need to have access to the internet.
• Keep yourself on muted status.
Provide Comments Via Email
Individuals who are uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or participate by
phone are encouraged to participate by emailing comments to lnagle@fcgov.com at least 24
hours prior to the meeting. If your comments are specific to any of the discussion items on the
agenda, please indicate that in the subject line of your email. Staff will ensure your comments
are provided to the Active Modes Advisory Board.
Active Modes Advisory Board
REGULAR MEETING
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Revisit of shared micromobility regulatory framework | Rachel
Ruhlen (15 min) (ACTION)
b. Northern Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization’s 2025
Coordinated Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan |
Aaron Hull (30 min) (INFORM, INPUT)
c. Restructuring Board Member Reports | Kat Steele (5 min) (INFORM,
INPUT)
8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
a. Kat Steele
9. STAFF LIASON REPORT
a. Council Six Month Agenda Planning Calendar
b. June: Bike Month in Colorado
10. ADJOURNMENT
ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING –REGULAR
April 21, 2025 6:00 p.m.
Online via Zoom or In Person at 281 North College
4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 1
FOR REFERENCE:
Chair: Bruce Henderson
Vice-Chair: Kat Steele
Staff Liaison: Lauren Nagle
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Henderson called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
2. ROLL CALL
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
Bruce Henderson, Chair
Kat Steele, Vice Chair
Wallace Jacobson
Cameron Phillips
Kevin Krause
Kristina Vrouwenvelder
Jared Hanson
Tim Han
Humphrey Costello
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
Lauren Nagle
DK Kemp
Nell Davis
ABSENT:
PUBLIC PRESENT:
None
3. AGENDA REVIEW
Chair Henderson outlined the published agenda.
4. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
None.
ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 2
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MARCH 2025
Han made a motion, seconded by Hanson, to approve the minutes of the March
2025 meeting. The motion was adopted unanimously.
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Welcome New Member: Humphrey Costello
Current members and new member Humphrey Costello introduced themselves
and commented on their interest in active modes.
b. Board Chair and Vice Chair Elections
Chair Henderson stated he is interested in continuing as Chair.
Han made a motion, seconded by Steele, to re-elect Bruce Henderson as
Chair. The motion was adopted unanimously.
Chair Henderson noted Vice Chair Krause is not interested in continuing to serve
in the role and discussed the role of the Vice Chair.
Steele expressed interest in the Vice Chair role.
Hansen made a motion, seconded by Jacobson, to elect Kat Steele as Vice
Chair. The motion was adopted unanimously.
c. Strategic Trails Plan – Dave ‘DK’ Kemp
Dave ‘DK’ Kemp, Project Manager, outlined the Strategic Trails Plan’s alignment
with Council priorities, including advancing the 15 -minute city by accelerating the
shift to active modes, reducing climate and air pollution, and Vision Zero. He
discussed the timeline for the project and stated the Plan is currently slated to go
before Council for adoption on May 20th.
Kemp discussed the public outreach main themes, including trails for all,
community connections, interconnected network, and compliment the on-street
network. He outlined the map of the proposed new trail connections which
strives to connect to underrepresented areas and create recreational loops within
the city. He stated the full build out will include 108 miles of trail with 71
over/underpasses.
Kemp discussed the lifecycle of a trail project, which includes maintenance over
time, and discussed the three trail types: major, minor, and spur/connector. He
outlined the guiding principles for the plan, including community input, 15 -minute
city, conservation and resilience, recreational experience, and demand and
growth. Additionally, Kemp discussed the project prioritization criteria which
ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 3
include equity, connectivity to schools, recreation value, demand and growth,
completing gaps in the system, and synergy and ease of implementation.
Kemp outlined eligible and potential trail funding sources and noted each mile of
trail costs about $1.8 million including planning and design. He stated the
forecast is for the development of about 1.5 miles of trail per year on average
unless it could be accelerated with additional funding , potentially from the CCIP
tax.
Chair Henderson asked how the CCIP funding allocation is determined. Kemp
replied Council makes the decision as to which projects are part of the package
for funding by the tax, which is set to be on the November ballot for renewal.
Kemp discussed the trails safety strategy, which includes an education
multimedia campaign, refreshed courtesy and etiquette signs, trial widening,
centerline striping, warning signs at bridges, underpasses, and junctions, and
Bicycle Ambassador Program routine trail pop-up events.
Kemp requested a letter of recommendation from the Board for the Strategic
Trails Plan.
Han asked if there are competing interests in terms of trail signage given that
additional signage may make the trails seem more like a roadway whereas less
signage may make them feel more recreational. Kemp replied that does exist
and stated we are moving from a town that has embraced trails as being a
recreational facility only to more of a transportation facility.
Vice Chair Steele asked if the Plan only includes city limits. Kemp replied it
includes the entire growth management area.
Vice Chair Steele asked how long build out is expected to take. Kemp replied the
next 22 miles of trail will take 15 years to complete with current funding levels.
Hanson asked what can be done to make the Strategic Trails Plan and its
projects more appealing to attract funds. Kemp replied a letter of support from
the Board to Council would be meaningful.
Costello asked where data on trail use and accidents can be found. Kemp
provided trail user data from 2022-2024.
Krause stated the extended timeline for completion of the trails system is difficult.
He asked if there has been any thought given to establishing a corridor with
single track or a gravel trail first. Kemp replied the trails in the northeast part of
town are contingent upon approved developments; however, there are other
areas that already have gravel that may be the right surface , including areas
along canals that would require a public access easement.
Krause stated he has heard that people may be interested in a multi-surface
approach.
ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 4
Kemp noted Natural Areas typically does not build a lot of hard surface trails,
though Parks sometimes builds paved trails through Natural Areas.
Vrouwenvelder asked if there is a place where the proposed on-street bike lane
improvements and Strategic Trails Plan can be seen together. Kemp replied all
online maps have both components of existing and proposed on -street and trail
facilities.
Kemp noted the Board could place a letter in Council’s read before packet. He
summarized the comments from other Boards as being primarily positive.
Costello asked about trail safety data. Kemp replied there is more of an issue
around perceived safety rather than actual safety. He noted crashes resulting in
severe injury are extremely rare, though there are likely many crashes that go
unreported. He also noted State of Colorado traffic crash reports are not filed on
trails, though Fort Collins Police do file incident reports if called.
Kemp noted a big part of the education campaign will be around creating a
culture of safety.
Vrouwenvelder made a motion, seconded by Han, to write a letter in
support of the Strategic Trails Plan. The motion was adopted unanimously.
d. School Traffic Safety Inspection Program – Nell Davis
Nell Davis, Traffic Operations Technical Project Manager, noted the city’s
population and traffic patterns have changed a great deal since most schools
were built, and safety improvements of the past are not necessarily serving
schools well now.
Davis stated a consultant was engaged in 2022 to develop the School Traffic
Safety Inspection Program inspection process and a tool kit of improvements and
best practices to apply. Davis noted the goal of the program is to conduct a
systematic inspection of all aspects of transportation and all travel modes at each
school to identify strengths and weaknesses and make recommendations in a
number of categories.
Davis stated the process starts each fall with meetings at identified schools,
observations of pick-up and drop-off periods, traffic studies of corridors and
intersections around the school, and inventories of the signs and pavement
markings. Following the data collection piece, recommendations are made in a
number of categories, including education, enforcement, maintenance,
infrastructure, and operational changes. Davis stated maintenance and minor
improvement recommendations are implemented the summer following the
inspection and education, operation, and enforcement changes are coordinated
with school staff and Police and grant funding or other opportunities are sought
for larger projects.
ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 5
Davis stated studies have been completed at six elementary schools and one
middle school, and there are about 50 schools in the city. Davis outlined the
recommendations provided for Zach Elementary and Lopez Elementary and
stated this school year, two elementary schools, two middle schools, and one
high school are being evaluated. Four elementary schools have been tentatively
chosen to be evaluated next year. Davis outlined the criteria for prioritizing the
schools and stated it is estimated that all schools will be evaluated by 2034, and
then the process will begin again.
Davis requested input from the Board in terms of making the program more
efficient and in possibly getting feedback from students.
Chair Henderson asked if there has been any discussion about partnering with
Safe Routes to School to implement some of the safety improvements. Davis
replied they work with the City’s Safe Routes to School coordinator quite a bit,
particularly in the education realm.
Phillips stated student input would be valuable and noted there are various
surveys students receive annually.
Vice Chair Steele asked what kinds of things have changed since schools were
built. Davis replied the volume of traffic has grown and several schools that have
been studied thus far are at or over capacity. Additionally, some schools have a
larger portion of private vehicles than they may originally have had as a
neighborhood school given families can opt in to any school.
Costello asked if there are generalizations that can be made about issues that
are common with many schools. Davis replied each school is different; however,
there are issues with U-turns at most schools, though the amount it is a problem
can vary. Davis noted reports go out to all principals and the school district and
there is hope that some of the lessons learned at Rocky Mountain High School
can be applied to other high schools.
Vrouwenvelder stated one universal safety improvement could be encouraging
schools to have fewer cars in parking lots and asked if there are
recommendations for carpooling or active modes integration. Davis replied
carpooling has not been addressed, but there are some walking ‘school bus’
programs that parents have started. Davis noted much of what comes out of the
reports are safety improvements for bicyclists and pedestrians, and it is hoped
that installing those improvements will encourage additional cyclists and
pedestrians.
Han noted Safe Routes to School cannot advocate for walking ‘buses’ or biking
‘buses’ due to liability issues.
Krause suggested the City or School District might be able to help with walking or
biking ‘bus’ programs as the liability is currently on the parents who participate.
ACTIVE MODES ADVISORY BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
4 /21 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 6
Jacobson suggested surveying older students and questioned how their opinions
would differ from parents in terms of increasing active modes.
Steele stated student input should be a critical part of this effort and suggested
focusing on the highest grade at each school to gather feedback. Steele asked if
there are different considerations or priorities for elementary, middle, and high
schools. Davis replied the priorities are the same, though each level provides
different challenges, including student drivers at high schools, more independent
riders and walkers at middle schools, and more drop-off situations at elementary
schools.
Vrouwenvelder concurred students may have interesting insights, but suggested
sampling across grades particularly in high school to ensure people with and
without drivers’ licenses are surveyed.
Costello noted youth are a protected class and there are many steps that need to
be taken to survey them and suggested Davis may want to go through another
entity that already has the structure established to do survey work.
8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Jacobson commented on the Centre Avenue flexible delineators between the drive and
bike lanes. He stated users have reported feeling safer.
Krause noted the civic assembly process for the Hughes Stadium property has started.
Chair Henderson noted Kelly Smith, who spoke at last month’s meeting on the Natural
Areas Strategic Framework, has requested a letter of support to Council from the Board.
Krause stated this alignment between the Natural Areas Strategic Framework and the
AMAB seems a bit too peripheral.
Nagle noted there will not be time prior to Council consideration of the Framework to
draft a memo at another meeting.
No members made a motion to send a memo of support to Council.
Chair Henderson stated that while the Framework is a good plan, there isn’t a tight link
between the plan at the goals of the Active Modes Advisory Board.
9. STAFF LIAISON REPORT
Nagle mentioned the Centre Avenue bike lanes.
10. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:01 p.m.
FC Moves
200 W Mountain Ave Suite A
PO Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522
970-221-6705
rruhlen@fcgov.com
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 19, 2025
To: Active Modes Advisory Board
From: Rachel Ruhlen, Transportation Planner
Subject: Shared Micromobility Code Changes
BOTTOM LINE
We are seeking an updated recommendation from the Active Modes Advisory Board on
establishing a regulatory framework for shared micromobility services.
BACKGROUND
On November 18, 2024, the Active Modes Advisory Board recommended requiring shared
micromobility services to have a permit and enter into a contract with the City of Fort Collins in
order to operate in the City, because the issue was to be considered by City Council soon after.
However, the item was re-worked internally and rescheduled for Council consideration.
Staff revised the ordinance to require shared micromobility services to have a services contract
with the City but would not require services to obtain a separate outdoor vendor license or
encroachment permits for such operations, since all necessary requirements would be
addressed in the services contract.
Because the November recommendation from the Active Modes Advisory Board recommended
requiring a contract and a permit, we are seeking an updated recommendation aligned with the
proposed ordinance language requiring a contract but not a permit (see attachment).
NEXT STEPS
Sample motion: “I move that the Active Moves Advisory Board recommend that Council adopt
the proposed Code changes to establish a regulatory framework for shared micromobility
services operating in the City of Fort Collins as presented in the materials for this meeting.”
City Code Amendments Regarding Shared Micromobility Operations
Section 1. That Section 15-381 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is amended to read as
follows:
Sec. 15-381. Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this Article, shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in this Section:
. . .
Linden Street shall mean that portion of Linden Street bounded on the south by the northern
edge of the Walnut Street right-of-way and on the north by the southern edge of the Jefferson
Street right-of-way.
Micromobility Device shall mean any motor-powered or human-powered vehicular unit,
including, but not limited to, bicycles, electrical assisted bicycles and electric scooters, or similar
apparatuses. Low power scooters, golf carts, and motor vehicles, as those devices are defined in
the Fort Collins Traffic Code, shall not be considered shared micromobility devices.
Mobile food truck shall mean a motorized wheeled vehicle or towed wheeled vehicle designed
and equipped to serve food. Mobile food truck shall include both "hot trucks," upon which food
is cooked and prepared for vending, and "cold trucks," from which only commissary-prepared,
ready-to-eat or packaged foods in individual servings are handled.
. . .
Outdoor vendor or vendor shall mean any person, whether as owner, agent, consignee or
employee, who sells or attempts to sell, or who offers to the public free of charge, any services,
goods, wares or merchandise, including, but not limited to, food or beverage, from any outdoor
location, except that outdoor vendor shall not include a person who:
. . .
(10) Vends outdoor transportation services as a public utility under a certificate of public
convenience and necessity issued by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission; or
(11) Vends food or catering services at an individual private residence for a private event;
or
(12) Vends shared micromobility services pursuant to § 15-395, below.
. . .
Outdoor vendor of transportation services shall mean an outdoor vendor (not regulated by the
Colorado Public Utilities Commission and not exempt from the definition of outdoor vendor)
who offers transportation services to the public. Outdoor vendor of transportation services shall
include, but not be limited to, vendors of valet parking services; transportation services by
pedal power such as pedi-cab or conference bicycle services; horse-drawn carriage rides; or
other means of transportation service offered for hire.
. . .
Ready-to-eat food shall mean food that is edible and that is in the form in which it is reasonably
expected to be consumed without further washing, cooking or additional preparation.
Shared micromobility service shall mean a service that makes privately-owned micromobility
devices available for use by the public, with the intent that the devices will at times remain in
the public right-of-way or other permitted areas when not actively rented or used. This includes
all such services, whether or not the micromobility devices are owned and managed as part of a
fleet, and whether or not public access is managed through the use of integrated on-board
technology or software applications.
Special vending license shall mean a temporary outdoor vendor license issued pursuant to
Subsection 15-382(c) below for outdoor vending at an occasional, temporary event located
solely on a single private lot when the event does not require the issuance of a special events
permit under Chapter 23.5 of this Code, which event may include, without limitation, a food
truck rally.
. . .
Section 2. That Chapter 15, Article XIV of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is amended by
the addition of a new Section 15-395 which reads in its entirety as follows:
Sec. 15-395. Shared Micromobility.
(a) The operation of shared micromobility services, as defined in § 15-381 above, within the
City of Fort Collins is prohibited unless pursuant to a services contract with the City pursuant to
Chapter 8, Article IV of this Code.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Code of the City of Fort Collins and any
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, a person operating a shared micromobility
service pursuant to a services contract with the City need not obtain any license otherwise
required under this Article in order to operate such service.
(c) The operation of shared micromobility services and devices must comply with all
applicable provisions of the Fort Collins Traffic Code. A person that owns or operates shared
micromobility services is responsible for ensuring all micromobility devices in its fleet are
parked in compliance with the Fort Collins Traffic Code when not being actively rented or used.
Section 3. That Section 23-81 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is amended to read as
follows:
Sec. 23-81. Permit required; application.
Any person desiring to place or erect a building, fence, barrier, post or other encroachments
within any City-owned property or any street, avenue, alley, sidewalk, highway or public right-
of-way in the City shall file a written application for a permit upon a form prepared and
provided by the City. The provisions of this Division shall not apply to special events as defined
in § 23.5-2 of this Code or to parking spaces as regulated by § 23-61 et seq., above, or to shared
micromobility services operated pursuant to § 15-395 of this Code.
2025 COORDINATED PLAN
Fort Collins Active Modes Advisory Board
May 19, 2025
2 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Introduction
Aaron Hull
Mobility Planner
3 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Presentation Overview
1.Introduction & Presentation Overview
2.Background on NFRMPO & Mobility Program
3.Overview of the RideNoCo Program
4.2025 Coordinated Plan Background, Demographics, & Transit Availability
5.2025 Coordinated Plan Gaps in Service, Example Strategies, & Public Survey
6.2025 Coordinated Plan Discussion
7.Conclusion
4 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization
(NFRMPO)
•Regional transportation & air quality planning agency
•Formed in 1988 and expanded to current boundaries in
2007
•Over 549,000 people
•Covers about 675 sq. mi.
•Parts of 2 counties and 13 communities
•Greeley Urbanized Area (UZA) & Fort Collins
Transportation Management Area (TMA)
•Mobility Program – ALL of Weld and Larimer Counties
5 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
NFRMPO Mobility Program
•RideNoCo – One-Call/One-Click Center
•Information Hub – website & call center
•MyWayToGo – Trip Planning Platform
•SchoolPooling tool
•Data for Planning Processes
•Mobility Committees
•Joint Northern Colorado Mobility
Committee
•Larimer County Mobility
Committee
•Weld County Mobility Committee
•Subrecipient Program & Technical
Assistance
•Connecting partners to State and
Federal Funding
•Coordinating service expansions in
areas where gaps have been identified
•Outreach, Education, and Community
Engagement
•Planning Efforts
•Coordinated Public Transit/Human
Services Transportation Plan
•Mobility Action Plan (MAP) to
guide implementation of
Coordinated Plan
•Updated every 4 years; Currently
being updated in 2025
•“Angel Fund” idea for an emergency
fund for one-time trips
•RideAlliance & RideNoCo Partnership
•Strategize for Multi -Partner
Coordination and Transportation
Management Organizations services
•Feedback to other NFRMPO Planning
Processes
6 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
RideNoCo Program
RideNoCo embodies two overarching goals:
1.Improving individual mobility for older
adults, individuals with disabilities,
individuals with a lower income, and
people who do not speak English as a first
language.
2.Improving regional mobility through
enhanced coordination and collaboration
among regional public and private
transportation providers, especially in
rural areas of Larimer & Weld counties.
7 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
RideNoCo Website & Call Center
RideNoCo Webpage
(970) 514-3636
Monday – Friday
8 am to 5 pm
Callback within one business day
Over-the-phone interpretation in 100+ Languages through
LanguageLink
8 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
RideNoCo Call Center & Website Stats
Year Calls/Emails Website Visits
2021 94 772
2022 143 1,986
2023 261 3,865
2024 368 4,968
Total 866 11,591
2025 year to
date 128 2,038
9 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
2025 Coordinated Plan Background
•Updated every four years.
•Mobility for older adults, individuals with disabilities, low -
income persons, and underserved communities
•Sets up project priorities for the next 5 – 10 years
•Allows for projects to be funded by FTA §5310 funds
•Example: RideNoCo program
•Strategic plan for Coordinated Transit (Mobility) in the region
•Four Parts of the Plan:
•Analyze existing conditions/options;
•Evaluating socioeconomic and ridership data;
•Identify mobility gaps; and
•Strategize improvements
10 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Older Adult Population (2023 - 2045)
2023 Older Adult Population
Population Larimer
County (all)
Weld
County (all)
NFRMPO
Region
Total
Population 363,561 340,711 549,237
60 and Above 82,228 62,419 91,014
Percent of total
population 22.62%18.32%16.57%
Source: 2023 ACS
2045 Older Adult Population
Population Larimer
County (all)
Weld County
(all)
NFRMPO
Region
Total
Population 506,604 634,300 906,510
60 and Above 130,155 125,752 163,594
Percent of
total
population
25.7%19.8%18.0%
Source: DOLA, NFRMPO LUAM
11 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Individuals with Disabilities (2023)
Population Larimer County (all)Weld County (all)NFRMPO Region
Total
Noninstitutionalized
Population
360,991 338,632 473,109
Percent with
Disability 10.3%11.3%11.0%
Percent Under 18
with Disability 4.7%6%1%
Percent 18-64 with
Disability 16.4 %18.6%6%
Percent 65+ with
Disability 59%74.7%4%
Source: 2023 ACS
12 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Regional Public Transportation
Availability in the Region
Estes Park:
The Peak
13 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Volunteer & Non-Profit Transportation Services
Availability in the Region
•Fort Collins
•Loveland
•Berthoud
•Estes Park
•Carbon Valley
•Weld County
•Weld County
14 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Gaps in Service
•New Neighborhoods not served by transit
•Between communities
•Rural areas need more support
•Affordable transportation
•Funding is very limited, so service is limited
•Awareness/Outreach (RideNoCo, Poudre
Express, Bustang, 60+ Ride, United Way, Etc.)
15 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Example Strategies
•The Weld County, Larimer County, and Joint Northern
Colorado Mobility Committees
•Technical assistance
•Vehicle purchases
•Grant reporting, writing, and management
•Letters of support
•Outreach, Marketing, and Education
•Rider’s Guides and other informational material
•RideNoCo expansion and optimization
•MyWaytoGo platform
•TDS System
16 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
2025 Coordinated Plan Public Survey
2025 Coordinated Plan Public Survey
You can take the 2025 Coordinated Plan Public Survey at the following link:
https://arcg.is/1rirDP0 or using the QR code below.
17 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Discussion Questions
•Who needs to be involved in this conservation?
•Are there any groups or individuals you
recommend contacting for this discussion?
•What are the mobility gaps you or your clients have
noticed?
•What projects, ideas, and/or strategies would be
helpful to address these mobility gaps?
•Any other questions, comments, or suggestions?
18 Coordinated Plan - LCMC
Thank you! Connect with the RideNoCo Team!
Aaron Hull
Mobility Planner
ahull@nfrmpo.org
(970) 672-0677
Tanya Trujillo-Martinez
Mobility Director
ttrujillo -martinez@nfrmpo.org
(970) 999-0072
Lisa Deaton
Mobility Specialist
ldeaton@nfrmpo.org
(970) 300-1076
2025 Coordinated Plan
Public Survey RideNoCo
8 am - 5 pm, Monday-Friday
mobility@nfrmpo.org
(970) 514-3636
RideNoCo Website
Transportation empowers freedom, giving everyone the ability to live, wo rk, an d explore without limits.
This survey is part of the North Front Range Metropolitan
Planning Organization's public involvement in creating the 2025
Coordinated Plan.
The 2025 Coordinated Plan brings together representatives from the public, human
service agencies, and transit agencies to set strategies, goals, and objectives for the
next four years. It focuses on mobility for older adults, individuals with disabilities,
low-income adults, and underserved communities.
It also considers mobility in all its forms, so it aims to look holistically and support
the public, providers, advocates, and stakeholders in improving at all levels.
Please provide Public Feedback at the below QR code:
Please contact Aaron Hull, Mobility Planner at the North Front Range
Metropolitan Planning Organization, with any questions or comments at
(970) 672-0677 or ahull@nfrmpo.org.
2025 COORDINATED PLAN
PUBLIC FEEDBACK SURVEY
El transporte empodera la libertad, brindando a todos la capacidad d e vivir, trabajar y explorar sin límites.
Esta encuesta es parte de la p articipación p ública d e la
Organización Metropolitana de Planificación d e la Franja
Norte del Frente en la creación d el Plan Coordinado 2025.
El Plan Coordinado 2025 reúne a representantes del público, age ncias de servicios
humanos y agencias de transporte para establecer estrategias, metas y objetivos
para los próximos cuatro años. Se centra en la movilidad de los adultos mayores,
personas con discapacidades, adultos de bajos ingresos y comunidades desatendidas.
También considera la movilidad en todas sus formas, por lo que tie ne como objetivo
un enfoque integral y apoyar al público, proveedores, defensores y partes
interesadas en mejorar a todos los niveles.
Por favor , proporcione su retroalimentación pública en el código QR a continuación:
Por favor, contacta a Aaron Hull, Planificador de Movilidad en la North Front
Range Metropolitan Planning Organization, para cualquier pregunta o
comentario al (970) 672-0677 o ahull@nfrmpo.org.
ENCUESTA DE RETROALIMENTACIÓN
PÚBLICA DEL PLAN COORDINADO 2025