Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD - MINUTES - 02/19/20251
2/19/2025 - Minutes
Natural Resources Advisory Board
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, February 19, 2025 – 6:00 PM
222 Laporte Avenue and via Microsoft Teams
1. CALL TO ORDER: 6:04 PM
2. ROLL CALL
a. Board Members Present –
• Dawson Metcalf (Chair)
• Kelly Stewart (Vice Chair)
• Matt Zoccali
• Lisa Andrews
• Barry Noon
• Sara LoTemplio
• Kelen Dowdy
b. Board Members Absent –
• Teagan Loew
c. Staff Members Present –
• Honore Depew, Staff Liaison
• Jill Oropeza, Utilities
• Bernadette Kuhn, Natural Areas
• Christina Schroeder, Utilities
• Kathryne Marko, Environmental Regulatory Affairs Manager
d. Guest(s) –
• Pat Burger
3. AGENDA REVIEW
Chair Metcalf reviewed the agenda items.
4. COMMUNITY MEMBER PARTICIPATION
Pat Burger, League of Women Voters of Larimer County President, stated the League is a non-
partisan group that has a mission to empower voters and defend democracy. She spoke in
support of a proposal from the Fort Collins Sustainability Group related to the implementation of
a Large Methane User Fee and urged the Board to express support for such a fee to City
Council.
Noon asked about the proposed use of the collected funds. Burger replied the dollars would go
into a fund that could be used by the affected businesses to purchase more efficient equipment.
Depew noted there is a legal requirement that this type of fee collected in the community must
directly go back to benefiting the fee payer.
2
2/19/2025 - Minutes
Zoccali asked how many businesses would be impacted. Depew replied Fort Collins
Sustainability Group’s analysis showed about 30 industrial establishments and 700 commercial
buildings would be subject to the fee and the fee would be based on exceeding a certain
methane usage.
Chair Metcalf expressed support for including a discussion on the topic at a future meeting.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – JANUARY 2025
Noon made a motion, seconded by LoTemplio, to approve the January 2025 regular
meeting minutes as amended. The motion was adopted unanimously.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. One Water – Projects Update
Jill Oropeza, Utilities Senior Director of Science and Planning, provided an overview of
the One Water approach, which manages all water whether from the tap, a stream, a
storm, an aquifer, or a sewer, in a collaborative, integrated, inclusive, and holistic
manner. She noted this approach is aligned with the Council priority of protecting the
community’s water systems as well as the strategic objective of sustaining the health of
the Poudre River and regional watersheds.
Oropeza discussed pressures facing the water system, including water quantity, water
quality and regulations, ecosystem degradation, aging and inadequate infrastructure, a
changing climate, and pricing and affordability.
Bernadette Kuhn, Natural Areas Senior Environmental Planner, commented on the
interdisciplinary, collaborative nature of these efforts and noted the vision is for a
healthy, resilient Poudre River watershed. She outlined the Poudre River Health
Assessment, which is a comprehensive, repeatable river sampling project that measures
the health of the Poudre River from its headwaters to the confluence with the South
Platte River. Additionally, Kuhn discussed the River Health Assessment Framework
Users’ Manual which has the goal of providing a high-quality, reproducible data set that
reflects the physical, biological, and chemical conditions of the river so that its
stewardship is guided by the best available science. She discussed the history of the
Framework noting it was initially developed in 2015 and outlined the indicators included:
aquatic habitat, aquatic life, riparian floodplain, river dynamics, river flow, sediment,
water quality, and wood regime, and noted there are several metrics associated with
each indicator.
Noon commented on a CSU study that was published in ecological applications a few
years ago which used the Poudre River as a case study. He also commented on
designing monitoring programs, including for the Northwest Forest Plan, and stated a
trend analysis itself does not provide any information on causation; therefore, he
suggested considering co-variants to help infer cause and effect relationships and asked
what co-variants are being considered in this case. Kuhn replied a co-variant related to
climate could be used for flows and stated this work will form a basis to start bringing co-
variants in.
3
2/19/2025 - Minutes
Noon asked if the Forest Service is part of these efforts. Kuhn replied in the affirmative.
Kuhn provided an example of data gathered in 2016 related to water quality, which uses
the metrics of temperature, nutrients, pH, and dissolved oxygen. She discussed some of
the ways in which the 2016 data has been used, including to determine where to spend
restoration dollars, to inform the Poudre Wildfire Ready Action Plan, to guide Preble’s
Meadow Jumping Mouse habitat restoration projects, and to inform the Poudre Flows
Project.
Kuhn outlined next steps in the project: to release the comprehensive data set in 2026,
have a community engagement phase in 2026-27, incorporate the data into the decision-
making process and restoration prioritization, and to utilize the data for project-level
monitoring.
Noon asked about the impact of the Northern Integrated Supply Project. Kuhn replied
staff has been having discussions with Northern Water about whether this tool could be
used in their process to ensure everyone is on the same page utilizing the same tool.
Noon expressed concern that unless there is some pressure put on Northern Water to
maintain higher inflows prior to Glade Reservoir being filled, this tool will not be useful.
He commended the staff work.
Zoccali asked how climate impacts other than flow are being considered at the regional
scale. Kuhn replied she is trying to bring carbon sequestration into restoration projects,
though that is not part of this methodology.
Noon noted Save the Poudre has a pending lawsuit related to the Thornton Pipeline to
keep the water in the river through town. He asked if the City has granted the 1041
permits to put the pipe through some of the Natural Areas. Kuhn replied the County
granted permission.
Noon expressed concern that Northern Water and Thornton have not been upfront and
honest about their projects. Kuhn noted these efforts are trying to create a data set that
is defensible, transparent, and repeatable.
Christina Schroeder, Utilities Director of Water Reclamation and Biosolids Division,
stated a master planning effort is currently underway for the Water Reclamation and
Biosolids Division to assess near- and long-term needs including changing regulatory
requirements. She stated the goal is to take a more holistic approach that includes other
water stakeholders. Schroeder discussed the City’s two treatment facilities and provided
an explanation of the water reclamation process at each facility noting the two are
connected by a bypass system.
Schroeder discussed the points of discharge into the Poudre River from each facility.
She noted there have been discussions about changing the Mulberry point of discharge,
though there are no plans to do so at this time.
Noon noted any contaminants in the water with decreased flow will be concentrated and
asked if there is any anticipation that the current infrastructure at either of the treatment
4
2/19/2025 - Minutes
plants will be inadequate to meet water quality requirements, thereby necessitating
additional equipment and associated costs. Oropeza replied an in-depth evaluation of
the impacts on wastewater treatment operations from NISP operations found there are
some changes in nutrients downstream; however, the main concern is about depleted
flows and Northern Water has stated it is not responsible for addressing that issue. She
stated there is a low chance of seeing significant impacts at the Mulberry facility.
Noon noted the population is increasing dramatically, therefore the amount of material in
the water stream will be increasing at the same time there may be decreasing flows due
to NISP. He stated it seems inevitable that the current facilities are going to reach a
point at which the water cannot be cleaned sufficiently enough to meet the requirements
of the Water Quality Act. Schroeder replied the sewer sheds for both the Drake and
Mulberry facilities do not exactly match with city limits, and both of those sewer sheds
are pretty much completely built out and have excess capacity. She noted the Drake
facility is rated for 23 million gallons per day, and on average, only 8 or 9 million gallons
are going through the facility per day.
Schroeder discussed regulatory challenges related to changing nutrient and quality
criteria. Additionally, other challenges include limits of technology, competing needs
including future regulations versus aging infrastructure, and funding sources. Schroeder
outlined potential solutions, including the Master Plan, a more holistic approach, and
stakeholder engagement.
Zoccali asked how or if One Water has made for more efficient and effective
collaboration with the ERA, planners, and other departments. Oropeza commented on
the Oak Street stormwater project which was a collaborative effort to minimize
disruptions and take advantage of opportunities.
Zoccali asked if there is any Cameron Peak Fire recovery work remaining. Oropeza
replied the City no longer has a primary role, but continues to engage around ecological
restoration, mostly guided through the resiliency plan for the upper Poudre.
Noon commented on activities undertaken by the Coalition for the Poudre River
Watershed on the South Fork. He also commented on a meeting with Joe Neguse in
Denver.
b. Information Committee Designee for Civic Assembly Process
Chair Metcalf stated the Board has been asked to designate a member to represent
NRAB in the upcoming civic assembly process looking at the former Hughes Stadium
site. He noted the process will consist of two meetings with the goal of considering
priorities and providing a prioritization of ideas.
Depew discussed the history of the Hughes Stadium site and citizen-led referendum
which passed and forced the City to purchase the property; however, there was no direct
guidance in the ballot language as to how the land should be used, which has led to the
need for this process.
Chair Metcalf stated he would volunteer to take the position as he has interest in the
topic.
5
2/19/2025 - Minutes
7. OTHER BUSINESS/UPDATES
Chair Metcalf asked if there is any interest among members in pursuing the topic brought up by
Ms. Burger. Members concurred they had some interest. Depew noted that it would be helpful
to include staff analysis, but that is not part of current work plans. So a next step could be
hearing an informational presentation from the Fort Collins Sustainability Group or its
representative.
a. Board Member Reports
Chair Metcalf announced a community smog exhibition at the CSU Gregory Allicar
Museum of Art. Additionally, he noted there will be Chair and Vice Chair elections
coming forward with the new members and stated he is interested in stepping down from
the Chair position.
Dowdy stated she is the Chair of the Coalition for the Poudre River Watershed Board
and they are asking people to reach out to local representatives regarding the federal
funding freeze as it is impacting the Coalition’s programs and ability to do work.
Noon commended the Coalition’s web page.
b. Six Month Calendar Review
Depew reviewed items that will be considered at upcoming Council meetings or work
sessions, including the water efficiency plan, housing affordability, the EV Readiness
Roadmap, the future of commercial corridors, Transfort, the capital tax renewal,
Members discussed possible topics for upcoming agendas, including the Natural Areas
Strategic Framework and new member orientation.
8. ADJOURNMENT
• 8:11 pm
Minutes approved by a vote of the Board on 3/12/2025