Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/10/1994 - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - AGENDA - Regular Meeting ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
FEBRUARY 10, 1994
1. Roll call.
2 Appeal 2093 . The variance would reduce the required rear yard
setback from 15 feet to 10'3" in order to allow a 2-story
addition to a single family home in the NCM zone. The 2nd
floor will comply with the required setback, however, the
first floor addition requires the variance. The existing home
is set back 913" from the rear property line. Section 29-
167 (4) by Sue Amador and Chris Christiansen, 938 Maple Street.
3 . Appeal 2094. The variance would reduce the required lot width
from 40 feet to 25 feet and the side yard setbacks along the
north and south lot lines from 5 feet to 4 . 5 feet. The
variances are necessary in order to demolish the older,
existing house and construct a new home on this lot in the NCB
zone. Section 29-210(2) , 29-210(5) by Randy Wick, 225 N.
Meldrum.
4 . Appeal 2095. The variance would allow a 45 square foot
freestanding sign to be setback 7 1/2 feet from the right-of-
way line instead of 12 1/2 feet. The variance would also
reduce the required setback from the interior side lot line on
the south side from 15 feet to 10 feet for the same sign. The
variances are requested due to the need to move the existing
sign further west as the result of the Shields Street widening
project. Section 29-595 (c) , 29-595(d) by David Massey, 829 S.
Shields Street.
5. Other business.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AGENDA
Regular Meeting
February 10, 1994
Appeal 2093
--- 938 Maple Street
--- Petitioner: Sue Amador and Chris Christiansen
nn --- Zone: NCM Zone
f --- Section 29-167 (4)
--- The variance would reduce the required rear yard setback from
15 feet to 101311 in order to allow a 2-story addition to a
single family home in the NCM zone. The 2nd floor will comply
with the required setback, however, the first floor addition
requires the variance. The existing home is set back 913"
from the rear property line.
--- Petitioner's statement of hardship: The lot is very shallow
and quite small. The home is also quite small. Existing,
mature trees and landscaping make it difficult to build in
another location on the lot. The existing house is already
closer to the rear lot line than the proposed addition will
be.
--- Staff comments: None.
t
Appeal 2094
--- 225 N. Meldrum
--- Petitioner: Randy Wick
--- Zone: NCB Zone
--- Section 29-210(2) , 29-210(5)
--- The variance would reduce the required lot width from 40 feet
G to 25 feet and the side yard setbacks along the north and
south lot lines from 5 feet to 4 . 5 feet. The variances are
necessary in order to demolish the older, existing house and
construct a new home on this lot in the NCB zone.
--- Petitioner's statement of hardship: The lot is only 25 feet
wide. The existing home is in bad condition and can't be
remodeled. The existing house is at a zero setback from the
north and south lot lines, so the new home, being at 4 1/2'
setbacks, will be an improvement.
--- Staff comments: None.
Appeal 2095
--- 829 S. Shields Street
--- Petitioner: David Massey
--- Zone: BL Zone
--- Section 29-595(c) , 29-595 (d)
--- The variance would allow a 45 square foot freestanding sign to
be setback 7 1/2 feet from the right-of-way line instead of 12
1/2 feet. The variance would also reduce the required setback
from the interior side lot line on the south side from 15 feet
to 10 feet for the same sign. The variances are requested due
to the need to move the existing sign further west as the
result of the Shields Street widening project.
--- Petitioner's statement of hardship: The property line of this
lot is being moved approximately 45 feet to the west as the
result of the City acquiring additional right-of-way for the
new right turn lane being installed as part of the Shields
Street widening. This means that the existing sign will be in
the right-of-way and must be moved. The Espresso building
must also be moved and it is necessary for the sign to be
located in front of that building in order to be visible. The
Espresso building can't be moved further, otherwise much
needed parking will be lost. The sign needs to be closer than
15 feet from the side lot line in order to be out of the
driveway. Since the lot has 2 curb cuts, there is no other
place to put the sign. The loss of the property for the right
turn lane is forcing everything to be moved back, and in order
to maintain adequate parking and circulation, this is the best
location for the sign.
--- Staff comments: None.