The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03/12/2025 - TRANSPORTATION BOARD - AGENDA - Regular Meeting3/12/2025 Agenda Page 1 TRANSPORTATION BOARD SUMMARY AGENDA March 12, 2025, 6:00PM – 8:00PM In person at 281 N. College, Venti Conference Room (2nd Floor) or online via Zoom This hybrid TRANSPORTATION BOARD meeting will be conducted in person at 281 N College Ave, 2nd floor conference room or you may join online via Zoom. Participants should join at least 5 minutes prior to the 6:00 p.m. start time. ONLINE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: You will need an internet connection on a laptop, computer, or smartphone, and may join the meeting through Zoom at https://us06web.zoom.us/join Webinar ID:992 3667 9837, Passcode 735155. (Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio). Keep yourself on muted status. For public comments, the Chairperson will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to comment. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION BY PHONE: Please dial +1-719-359-4580 and enter Meeting ID 99236679837; Passcode 73515. Keep yourself on muted status. For public comments, when the Chair asks participants to click the “Raise Hand” button if they wish to speak, phone participants will need to press *9 to do this. Staff will be moderating the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Transportation Board. When you are called, press *6 to unmute yourself. Documents to Share: Any document or presentation a member of the public wishes to provide to the Transportation Board for its consideration must be emailed to mdempsey@fcgov.com at least 24 hours before the meeting. Provide Comments via Email: Individuals who are uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or participate by phone are encouraged to participate by emailing comments to mdempsey@fcgov.com at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. If your comments are specific to any of the discussion items on the agenda, please indicate that in the subject line of your email. Staff will ensure your comments are provided to the Transportation Board. (Continued on next page) TRANSPORTATION BOARD SUMMARY AGENDA March 12, 2025 6:00PM – 8:00PM nd 1. CALL TO ORDER [10 minutes for items 1-6] 2. ROLL CALL 3. AGENDA REVIEW 4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION [3 minutes per participant] 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7. NEW BUSINESS [50 minutes] a. Which Wheels Go Where: Discuss options and seek input on proposed code changes [Rachel Ruhlen, FC Moves] 8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS [50 minutes] a. Reflections from our outgoing board members [20 minutes] b. Other board members [30 minutes, 3 minutes/person] 9. OTHER BUSINESS [10 minutes] a. Staff Liaison Report b. City Council 6 Month Calendar Review 10. ADJOURNMENT TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR February 19, 2025, 6:00 p.m. Online Via Zoom or In-Person at 281 North College 2/19 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 1 FOR REFERENCE: Chair: Ed Peyronnin Vice Chair: Council Liaison: Alexa Nickoloff Susan Gutowsky Staff Liaison: Melina Dempsey 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Peyronnin called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. 2. ROLL CALL BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Ed Peyronnin, Chair Alexa Nickoloff, Vice Chair James Burtis Jerry Gavaldon Lourdes Alvarez Emily Felton Amanda Finch Indy Hart BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: David Baker CITY STAFF PRESENT: Ginny Sawyer Joe Wimmer PUBLIC PRESENT: Elizabeth ? 3. AGENDA REVIEW Chair Peyronnin noted Councilmember Susan Gutowsky will be present at the meeting and stated there are no changes to the published agenda. TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 2 /1 9 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 2 4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION None. 5. APPROVAL OF MINTUES – JANUARY 2025 Gavaldon made a motion, seconded by Nickoloff to approve the January 2025 minutes as written. The motion was adopted unanimously with Alvarez abstaining. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Community Capital Improvement Program – ¼ Cent Tax Renewal – Ginny Sawyer Ginny Sawyer, Project and Policy Manager, stated the Community Capital Improvement tax will be on the November election for renewal and provided a history of the City’s dedicated taxes. Sawyer noted the dedicated taxes do not apply to groceries. In terms of the Capital Improvement tax itself, Sawyer outlined previously funded projects and noted this renewal would run from 2026 to 2035. Sawyer discussed the methodology used in developing proposed project packages, including better financial modeling, utilizing master plans, and distributing projects community-wide. Joe Wimmer, Financial Services, stated this is a ¼ cent sales tax which will generate around $11 million annually in today’s dollars, or approximately $110 million over ten years. He noted that after City departments were surveyed, approximately $166 million worth of projects were identified. Sawyer noted the identified projects are a bit heavier on transportation projects as this revenue source allows for the City to provide matching funds for grants. Wimmer outlined some of the possible projects that may be included in the tax renewal, including transportation and engineering projects such as the arterial intersection improvement program, bicycle infrastructure and the overpass/underpass program, the pedestrian sidewalk program, bus stop replacement, Transfort bus replacement, and strategic trails implementation. Parks and recreation and culture projects include refreshing the children’s garden and event infrastructure at the Gardens on Spring Creek, repurposing the downtown trolley building, replacing the Mulberry Pool, potential installation of a bike park and dog parks, and a pickleball complex. Nature, river, and environment projects include increased trail facilities, improvements to the Timberline Recycling Center, and implementation of Nature in the City projects. Other potential projects include affordable housing funding by bonding against the sales tax to seed a revolving loan fund for housing projects. TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 2 /1 9 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 3 Gavaldon stated he does not see a return for developers in terms of increasing the affordable housing stock. He stated the market will always dictate the price of housing and questioned whether this would be a wise use of funds. Sawyer stated staff is open to ideas and ensuring projects have the largest impact possible. Gavaldon suggested looking at repair and maintenance for all existing facilities. Sawyer noted the project list needs to be decreased or scaled by approximately $60 million. Sawyer provided a timeline for the next few months, including visit to the Council Finance Committee on March 6th, and a full Council work session on May 27th. Gavaldon asked if Transfort funding needs to be included. Sawyer replied Transfort funding has almost always been part of the package and the proposal is to ensure the level of funding is maintained. Wimmer and Sawyer provided an interactive link for members to provide input on the project list in terms of projects that would provide the greatest and least community impact and on the tax renewal package name. Members commented on the need for not only affordable housing, but missing middle housing as well. Members also discussed low-interest loan programs. Chair Peyronnin asked if there is an alternative plan for federal funding given the new federal administration. Sawyer replied there is not necessarily an alternative plan; however, the City’s Grant Compliance Manager has compiled a list of grants that may be at risk and adjustments will be made as necessary. b. Councilmember Susan Gutowsky – Introductions and Discussion Members of the Board introduced themselves and commented on their work and interests outside of the Board. Councilmember Gutowsky introduced herself and commented on her time in Fort Collins as a teacher and Councilmember. Hart encouraged the Board to take advantage of the opportunity to have Councilmember Gutowsky present and asked what types of transportation related issues are important to Council and would be important for the Board to address. Councilmember Gutowsky commented on E-bike safety on trails, particularly as it relates to seniors. Chair Peyronnin noted trails are under the purview of Parks and Recreation and suggested it may be beneficial for them to be integrated into the overall transportation network and fall under the purview of either the Active Modes Advisory Board or the Transportation Board. Hart noted the Board could request a staff presentation regarding any topic of interest. Councilmember Gutowsky commented on her desire to expand Transfort routes, TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 2 /1 9 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 4 particularly toward the north part of town. She also encouraged members to attend Council meetings and speak during public comment. Gavaldon commented on the difficulty rangers have in distinguishing class 3 E-bikes, which are not allowed on trails, from other classes. He also commented on the recent Police Chief’s Advisory Committee meeting during which it was reported that the new speed cameras are functioning well. It was noted that signage for the cameras is regulated by the State. Hart noted class 3 E-bikes can often be identified if the rider is not pedaling. Members discussed the difficulties in enforcing trail speeds, and it was noted that meandering trails do help with speed. Members discussed the West Elizabeth MAX line and ridership numbers. Hart discussed the importance of reliability of Transfort routes and Alvarez commented on the importance of route connectivity. Gavaldon commented on the need to encourage the placement of higher-density housing near transit for residents other than students. Members discussed the importance of last-mile transportation options and of examining crosswalks and intersections for safety. Gavaldon commented on the Harmony and College intersection being developed in 1998 and members discussed high speed limits on Harmony and Mulberry. Finch requested input from Councilmember Gutowsky regarding how the Board should best approach Council with specific suggestions. Councilmember Gutowsky outlined the way in which a Councilmember can bring forth direction for staff under Other Business. Gavaldon noted drivers get ticketed from the speed cameras for going eleven miles per hour over the speed limit, and on Harmony, the speed limit is 55 miles per hour, making a driver receive a ticket if they are going 66 miles per hour. Members discussed the importance of road diets to reduce speeds. Vice Chair Nickoloff commented on the importance of signal timing along arterials to help decrease road rage and keep drivers from attempting to speed through intersections to make the lights. Members discussed the safety advantages of roundabouts over signals and four-way stops. Gavaldon suggested it would be valuable for the Board to collaborate with the Active Modes Advisory Board to provide recommendations to Council regarding the Master Street Plan. TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 2 /1 9 /202 5 – MINUTES Page 5 8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS Chair Peyronnin commended the joint meeting with the Active Modes Advisory Board and noted he is having a monthly meeting with Chair Henderson. 9. OTHER BUSINESS a. Staff Liaison Report Dempsey announced the Transportation Fair on March 6th at the Lincoln Center and noted the March Transportation Board meeting will be on the 12th. She suggested the Board discuss topics of interest at the March meeting to plan for upcoming meetings. b. City Council 6-Month Calendar Review – refer to packet c. Transfort Report – refer to packet 10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. by unanimous consent. Headline Copy Goes Here Rachel Ruhlen, Transportation Planner Dave “DK” Kemp, Senior Trails Planner Which Wheels Go Where? -Project Update 2025 03 12 Transportation Board Headline Copy Goes HereAgenda •Purpose •Community & stakeholder engagement results and research •Discuss options and seek input on proposed code changes Headline Copy Goes Here 3 Purpose Micromobility supports climate, active mode, Vision Zero goals. Which Wheels Go Where? explores how to accommodate more kinds of micromobility. Headline Copy Goes Here E-unicycle 4 Micromobility (human & electric powered) Roller skates Kick scooter Tricycle Unicycle Bicycle Roller blades Longboard Skateboard E-trikes & E-bikes E-scooter E-skateboard Headline Copy Goes Here Toy vehicles 5 Currently a Complex and Confusing Chart Headline Copy Goes HereNew Micromobility Definitions Human Powered Vehicle Lightweight Electric Vehicle ≤20 mph Low Power Scooter Not micromobility Headline Copy Goes Here 7 A Potential Revised & Simplified Chart Human powered vehicles Lightweight electric vehicles Low power scooter Street Allowed Allowed Allowed Bike lane Allowed Allowed Prohibited Sidewalk Allowed Allowed Prohibited Paved Trails Allowed Allowed Prohibited Crosswalk Ride Ride Prohibited Dismount zone Dismount Dismount Prohibited Headline Copy Goes Here Community Engagement Questionnaire Results 8 Headline Copy Goes Here 9 Questionnaire Outreach & Design Outreach Efforts: •English and Spanish Versions •Incentives •Flyers, yard signs, social media, postcards, press release, email •Events •Partners Questionnaire Design: •Quiz to educate •Concerns •Open-ended comment section •Transportation use •Demographics Headline Copy Goes Here 10 Concerns? 1,478 Response Do you have any concerns about human powered or lightweight electric vehicles on sidewalks, paved trails, bike lanes, or streets? All answers Spanish survey Headline Copy Goes Here 11 Top concerns (Sidewalks) Headline Copy Goes Here 12 Top concerns (Bike Lanes) Headline Copy Goes Here 13 Top concerns (Streets) What is your top concern regarding the use of _____ on streets? Headline Copy Goes Here 14 Top concerns (Paved Trails) Headline Copy Goes Here 15 Open-Ended Comments (718) “As a pedestrian on sidewalks, I worry about being hit by an electric vehicle” “Bike lanes should be protected from traffic to increase use and confidence in being safe” “At current state it is confusing, and thus people will not be following the rules anyways” “Educating drivers in how to interact with these devices seems imperative” “Assuming speeds stay low/responsible... there should be no reason to limit these vehicles. Less cars on the road, less traffic, less pollution” “Don't punish good people that are enjoying the ride nicely, simply because of others” “I've witnessed many scooters, bikes, skateboards going too fast and not adhering to the rules of the road/trail.” “Concerned about faster vehicles on trails for human-powered modes of transportation where limited-mobility users/kids may get hurt.” Headline Copy Goes Here 16 Use vs. Facility Type Headline Copy Goes Here 17 Use vs. Facility Type Headline Copy Goes Here 18 Demographics Headline Copy Goes Here Enforcement Consideration and Feedback 19 Headline Copy Goes Here 20 Enforcement Feedback •Research (Boulder Police) •In 2021, Boulder allowed human powered and lightweight electric vehicles on streets, sidewalks, and paved trails •Police expected more impact from rule change •No increase in crashes •CSU Police •Need appropriate citation for careless riding on streets, sidewalks •Prefer riders on streets and off sidewalks, regardless of vehicle •FC Police •Allowing micromobility devices on streets could result in increased severe crashes •Speed limits leads to expectations of patrols & enforcements (Police & Prosecutors) •Limited resources for enforcement •Recommend safety education approach •Park Rangers (Paved Trails) •Cannot detain or pursue •“Authority of the Resource” •Recommends safety education approach Headline Copy Goes Here Explore Options 21 Headline Copy Goes Here 22 Sidewalks Sidewalks Human-powered vehicle Lightweight Electric Vehicle Bikes and e- bikes* Skateboards, roller skates, etc. E-scooters E-skateboard, one-wheel, etc. Current regulations Allowed (except dismount zones)Unclear Allowed Staff is exploring Allowed (except dismount zones) *Current ordinance is unclear on whether Class 3 e-bikes are permitted on sidewalks. Exploring consistency: Class 3 e-bikes either be allowed or prohibited on sidewalks,paved trails, and crosswalks. (except dismount zones) Headline Copy Goes Here 23 Crosswalks Crosswalks Human-powered vehicle Lightweight Electric Vehicle Bikes, e-bikes* Skateboards, roller skates, etc. E-scooters E-skateboard, one-wheel, etc. Current regulations Ride (except dismount zones)Dismount Staff is exploring Ride (except dismount zones) *Class 3 e-bikes are currently required to dismount in crosswalks. Headline Copy Goes Here 24 Streets Streets/Bike Lanes Human-powered vehicle Lightweight Electric Vehicle Bikes and e- bikes Skateboards, rollerskates, etc. E-scooters E-skateboard, one-wheel, etc. Current regulations Allowed Not allowed Allowed Not allowed Staff is exploring Allowed Headline Copy Goes Here 25 Police Department Feedback (low vs high speed streets) Roads that would be unavailable with speed limit restriction Bike lanes Streets Other human powered vehicles Separated bike lanes Low speed Other lightweight electric vehicles Separated bike lanes Low speed Headline Copy Goes Here 26 Paved trails Paved trails or multi-use paths Human-powered vehicle Lightweight Electric Vehicle Bikes, e-bikes Skateboards, rollerskates, etc. E-scooters E-skateboard, one-wheel, etc. Current regulations Allowed (except Class 3 e-bikes)Not allowed (except on Mason Trail) Staff is exploring Allowed* *Exploring consistency: Class 3 e-bikes either be allowed or prohibited on sidewalks, paved trails, and crosswalks. Cities that allow e-scooters on paved trails: Denver, Boulder, Fayetteville, Salt Lake City, Columbus Headline Copy Goes Here 27 T Board Feedback • What feedback do you have regarding proposed new definitions? • What are your concerns? • What are the opportunities? Sidewalks Bike lanes Streets Paved trails Headline Copy Goes Here Thank you! Rachel Ruhlen, rruhlen@fcgov.com 28 Staff Liaison Report – March 2025 TRANSPORTATION BOARD • Thank you to Indy and Jerry for your years of contribution to the Transportation Board. • Upcoming meeting agenda topics include: o Transportation Capital Improvement Program (April)  Welcome New Members  Future of Board Reports  Work Plan Implementation (this or Future of Board Reports may have to occur one of the following months based on discussion time) o Transfort Optimization Plan (May, possibly June) o Downtown Parking Study (June, possibly May) • Bike to Work Day: June 25th Council 6 -month calendar • Monday, March 25th: Work session to include Bike Feasibility Study Update • Tuesday, April 8th: Work session to include EV Readiness and Electriﬁcation • Tuesday, April 22nd: Work Session to include Update on School Transportation Safety Assessments and the Future of Commercial Corridors, Future of Sounds in Fort Collins and Centers: Land Use Code Updates • Tuesday, May 13th: Work session to include Reduce Climate Pollution and Air Pollution Through Best Practices Emphasizing Electriﬁcation, and Transfort Optimization Study • Tuesday, May 20th: Adoption of the Strategic Trails Plan • Tuesday, June 17th: Bike Month Proclamation • Tuesday, July 8th: Which Wheels Go Where: Micromobility