HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/11/1992 - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - AGENDA - Regular Meeting ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
JUNE 11, 1992
1. Roll call .
2 . Appeal 2028. The variance would increase the maximum height
requirement for a 36 square foot freestanding sign at a 7 foot
setback, from 13 feet to 15 feet. The variance would allow
the current pole-mounted sign to remain in its present
location. This appeal was tabled from the May 14 , 1992
meeting. Section 29-595(c) by Kevin and Ed Zdenek, 1220 S .
College Avenue.
3. Appeal 2029 . The variance would reduce the required side yard
setback along the east lot line from 5 feet to 4 feet in order
to allow an addition to an existing single family home. The
addition will line up with the existing east wall. The house
is located in the NCL zone. Section 29-199 (5) by Dr. and Mrs .
Tom Nevrivy, 1334 W. Oak Street.
4 . Appeal 2030. The variance would allow a 20 square foot per
face freestanding sign to be located within 15 feet of an
interior side lot line. Specifically, the variance would
allow a sign for the 'variety Flea Market" to be located
within 1 foot from the east lot line. Section 29-595 (d) by
Gene Homolka, 1137 Riverside Avenue.
5 . Appeal 2031 . The variance would reduce the required side yard
setback along the west lot line from 5 feet to 1 foot, in
order to allow a portion of the rear of the house to be
demolished, then reconstructed and enlarged. The home is
located in the NCL zone. Section 29-119(5) by Stephanie
Schultz and Jan Watson, 1018 W. Oak Street.
6 . Appeal 2032. The variance would allow a subdivision sign to
be 121 square feet instead of the allowed 35 square feet.
(The actual size of the letters are 30 square feet, but the
size of the wall is 116 square feet. ) The sign is the
permanent identification sign for the English Ranch
Subdivision. Section 29-591( 6) by Bartran & Comapany , 3600
Kingsley Drive.
7 . Appeal 2033. The variance would reduce the required street
side setback along Antelope Road from 15 feet to 9 feet in
order to allow a 13 ' x 27 ' sunroom addition to be built onto
the south side of the home. The house is located in the RLP
zone. Section 29-133 (5 ) by Mr. & Mrs. Greg Zander, 3626
Silvertip Place.
8 . Appeal 2034 . The variance would reduce the required landscape
parking lot setback along the north lot line from a 5 foot
minimum width at any one point to one foot in width, while
also reducing the average 5 foot landscape setback along the
north lot line to 3 feet. The variance would also reduce the
required 5 foot landscape setback along the south lot line to
zero feet. The variances are for a retail store/post office
located in the BL zone. Section 29-493 ( 1) by David Massey,
829 S. Shields Street.
9. Other business.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AGENDA
Regular Meeting
JUNE 11, 1992
Appeal 2028
--- 1220 S. College Avenue
--- Petitioner: Kevin and Ed Zdenek, tenant.
--- Zone: BL
--- Section 29-595 (c)
v --- The variance would increase the maximum height requirement for
a 36 square foot freestanding sign at a 7 foot setback, from
, 13 feet to 15 feet. The variance would allow the current
pole-mounted sign to remain in its present location. This
appeal was tabled from the May 14, 1992 meeting.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The petitioner requested
a variance on March 12 , 1992 to convert the sign to a ground
sign and allow it to encroach into the required sight distance
triangle. The variance was not approved, and the petitioner
is now modifying the request. Moving the sign back enough in
order to allow the 15 foot height would result in loss of sign
visibility due to large pine trees and traffic signs and
apparatus. Lowering the sign results in an encroachment into
the sight distance triangle.
--- Staff comments: None
Appeal 2029
--- 1334 W. Oak Street
--- Petitioner: Tom and Jane Nevrivy, owners.
--- Zone: NCL
--- Section 29-199 ( 5)
--- The variance would reduce the required side yard setback along
the east lot line from 5 feet to 4 feet in order to allow an
G addition to an existing single family home. The addition will
line up with the existing east wall. The house is located in
5 .0 the NCL zone.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The home is an older
home. The east wall is already only 4 feet from the lot lane.
The owners desire to convert an existing back porch into a
family room and extend it by 3 feet, lining up with the
existing structure.
--- Staff comments: None.
Appeal 2030
--- 1137 Riverside Avenue
--- Petitioner: Gene Homolka
--- Zone: IG
--- Section 29-595(d)
--- The variance would allow a 20 square foot per face
freestanding sign to be located within 15 feet of an interior
side lot line. Specifically, the variance would allow a sign
for the "Variety Flea Market" to be located within 1 foot from
the east lot line.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The building is set back
from the street further than the two adjacent buildings.
Therefore, the sign on the building wall is not very visible
to motorists. A freestanding sign is desirable; however, the
only place to put it is close to the east lot line. Anywhere
else would mean the sign would be located in the driveway or
behind parking spaces .
--- Staff comments: None.
AP12eal 2031
--- 1018 W. Oak Street
--- Petitioner: Stephanie Schultz and Jan Watson
--- Zone: NCL
--- Section 29-119 (5 )
--- The variance would reduce the required side yard setback along
the west lot line from 5 feet to 1 foot, in order to allow a
portion of the rear of the house to be demolished, then
reconstructed and enlarged. The home is located in the NCL
zone.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The house is an older
building which is currently only 1 foot from the lot line.
The enclosed porch and bathroom are in poor condition. The
owner would like to demolish the porch and build an addition
on the back of the house. The addition will line up with the
existing west wall and will extend 11 feet further north then
the current house. Aesthetically, it will look better to line
up the new construction with what already exists.
--- Staff comments: The Zoning Board granted similar variances to
two properties located across the alley. In 1985 , a variance
was granted to 1007 W. Mountain to reduce the west setback to
2 .2 feet, and in 1988 a variance was granted to 1009 W.
Mountain to reduce their west setback to 2.8 feet.
Appeal 2032
--- 3600 Kingsley Drive
--- Petitioner: Bartran & Comapany
--- Zone:
--- Section 29-591 (6 )
--- The variance would allow a subdivision sign to be 121 square
feet instead of the allowed 35 square feet. (The actual size
of the letters are 30 square feet, but the size of the wall is
126 square feet. ) The sign is the permanent identification
sign for the English Ranch Subdivision.
--- Petitioner ' s statement of hardship: The actual size of the
letters of the sign are 30 square feet. However, the letters
are mounted upon a decorative entrance wall structure which is
-0 126 square feet and is considered signage by the Sign Code
because it is not a part of a longer fence structure. The
owner' s hardship is that he is unable to connect this
structure to a fence like many other developers have done
because the location of the sign and wall is in a storm
drainage area which is planned to be landscaped and maintained
as usable open space.
--- Staff comments: None.
Appeal 2033
--- 3626 Silvertip Place
--- Petitioner: Mr. & Mrs. Greg Zander
--- Zone: RLP
--- Section 29-133 ( 5 )
--- The variance would reduce the required street side setback
along Antelope Road from 15 feet to 9 feet in order to allow
a 13 ' x 27 ' sunroom addition to be built onto the south side
of the home. The house is located in the RLP zone.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The owner' s desire is to
have a room which takes advantage of the southern exposure.
In order for the room to be large enough to accommodate
furniture and be functional, the addition will encroach into
the required setback. Without a variance the room would only
be 7 feet wide.
--- Staff comments : None.
A2peal 2034
--- 829 S. Shields Street
--- Petitioner: David Massey
--- Zone: BL
--- Section 29-493 ( 1 )
--- The variance would reduce the required landscape parking lot
setback along the north lot line from a 5 foot minimum width
at any one point to one foot in width, while also reducing the
average 5 foot landscape setback along the north lot line to
C� ` � ,� 3 feet. The variance would also reduce the required 5 foot
WW�_ landscape setback along the south lot line to zero feet. The
variances are for a retail store/post office located in the BL
zone.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The change of use of the
property requires compliance with the current code. The city
is going to be installing a right turn lane, thus additional
right-of-way will be required. Since the building is
existing, lost parking can't be replaced elsewhere on the lot,
it is important to maintain as much parking as possible. The
petitioner proposes to improve the existing landscaping on the
lot to the south in order to off-set the requirement for his
lot. If the 5 foot is required along the north lot line, then
a whole row of parking will have to be eliminated. Likewise
the parallel parking along the south lot line would have to be
eliminated if the south 5 foot strip is required.
--- Staff comments: Due to the congestion at the corner of
Elizabeth and Shields, it is very difficult to enter and exit
this property. Ease of internal parking lot circulation due
to stacking of vehicles waiting to exit is important to
attempt to obtain. The proposed "one-way" circulation helps
to achieve this.