HomeMy WebLinkAboutZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - - 05/14/1992 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
May 14, 1992
1 . Roll call .
2 . Appeal 2024 . The variance would eliminate the requirement to
provide a 5 foot wide landscape buffer strip along the north
lot line, in order to allow the building to be changed in use
from a drive-in restaurant to a hair salon in the HB zone.
The rest of the landscape require-ments will be complied with.
Section 29-493 ( 1) by Dixie Johnson, 920 College Avenue.
3. Appeal 2025 . The variance would reduce the required rear yard
setback from 15 feet to 5 feet for a new detached, two-car
garage, in the NCL zone. The new garage will replace the
existing one-car garage. Section 29-119 (4) by Charles Cote,
726 W Mountain Ave.
4 . Appeal 2026. The variance would allow a home occupation to be
conducted with two employees, who don' t reside in the home,
instead of the one employee allowed by the code. The home
occupation will be for a crown and bridge dental laboratory,
which does not involve client traffic. Section 29-459 ( 1 ) by
Craig Jobe, 1200 Windsor Road.
5 . Appeal 2027 . The variance would reduce the required rear yard
setback from 15 feet to 11.5 feet and the required side yard
setback along the east lot line from 5 feet to 4 feet in order
to allow an older, one-car garage, with a collapsed lean-to
addition to be reconstructed into a two-car garage using the
previously existing building footprint. The property is in
the NCL zone. Section 29-119-(4 ) by Paul Munana, 1200 Laporte
Ave.
6 . Appeal 2028. The variance would increase the maximum height
requirement for a 36 square foot freestanding sign, at a 7
foot setback, from 13 feet to 15 feet. The variance would
allow the current pole-mounted sign to remain in its present
location. The property is located in the BL zone. Section
29-595 (C) by Kevin & Ed Zdenek, 1220 S College Ave.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AGENDA
Regular Meeting
May 14 , 1992
Appeal 2024
--- 920 College Avenue
--- Petitioner: Dixie Johnson
--- Zone: HB
i �
--- Section 29-493 ( 1 )
--- The variance would eliminate the requirement to provide a 5
foot wide landscape buffer strip along the north lot line, in
order to allow the building to be changed in use from a drive-
in restaurant to a hair salon in the HB zone. The rest of the
landscape require-ments will be complied with.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The building is existing.
The change of use from restaurant to hair salon requires that
the property be brought into compliance with the parking code.
However, the building is located only 41 feet from the north
lot line. In order to provide the 5 foot landscape strip and
the parking stalls and driveway, the building would have to be
46 feet from the lot line. Therefore, the building would have
to be moved or the parking would have to be eliminated. All
other requirements of the parking code will be complied with.
--- Staff comments:
Appeal 2025
--- 726 W Mountain Ave
--- Petitioner: Charles Cote
--- Zone: NCL
--- Section 29-119 (4 )
--- The variance would reduce the required rear yard setback from
15 feet to 5 feet for a new detached, two-car garage, in the
NCL zone. The new garage will replace the existing one-car
garage.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The existing garage is
small and encroaches into the side yard setback. The
petitioner desires to demolish it and build a new, two-car
garage. The building can' t be located any further to the
south, because it is necessary to maintain adequate distance
between the garage and the house in order to get cars in and
out of the building.
--- Staff comments:
Appeal 2025
--- 1200 Windsor Road
--- Petitioner: Craig Jobe
--- Zone: RLP
/ --- Section 29-459 ( 1 )
The variance would allow a home occupation to be conducted
with two employees, who don't reside in the home, instead of
the one employee allowed by the code. The home occupation
will be for a crown and bridge dental laboratory, which does
not involve client traffic.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The business will
generate no traffic and will have less impact than permitted
home occupations such as hair salons and insurance agencies.
The business is currently located in Loveland, with two
employees, and the owner desires to relocate to Fort Collins .
The use will be conducted in the rear portion of an R.V.
garage, and will not be visible from the street.
--- Staff comments:
Appeal 2027
--- 1200 Laporte Ave
--- Petitioner: Paul Munana
--- Zone: NCL
--- Section 29-119-( 4 )
--- The variance would reduce the required rear yard setback from
15 feet to 11 .5 feet and the required side yard setback along
the east lot line from 5 feet to 4 feet in order to allow an
older, one-car garage, with a collapsed lean-to addition to be
reconstructed into a two-car garage using the previously
existing building footprint. The property is in the NCL zone.
--- Petitioner ' s statement of hardship: The building is old and
has been in this location for about 40 years . A lean-to
addition recently collapsed and the owner would like to
rebuild it, using the existing walls. By changing the roof
trusses, the hope if to make it a two-car garage. However,
the building will be the exact same size as prior to the
collapse and will be reconstructed on the existing concrete
pad.
--- Staff comments:
Appeal 2028
--- 1220 S College Ave
--- Petitioner: Kevin & Ed Zdenek
--- Zone: BL
--- Section 29-595 (C)
The variance would increase the maximum height requirement for a 36
square foot freestanding sign, at a 7 foot setback, from 13 feet to
15 feet. The variance would allow the current pole-mounted sign to
remain in its present location. The property is located in the BL
zone.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The petitioner requested
a variance on March 12, 1992 to convert the sign to a ground
sign and allow it to encroach into the required sight distance
triangle. The variance was not approved, and the petitioner
is now modifying the request. Moving the sign back enough in
order to allow the 15 foot height would result in loss of sign
visibility due to large pine trees and traffic signs and
apparatus. Lowering the sign results in an encroachment into
the sight distance triangle.
--- Staff comments: