Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/11/1990 - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - AGENDA - Regular Meeting ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AGENDA
October 11, 1990
1. Appeal #1965. Allow the use of a detached building in
connection with a home occupation. Specifically, it would
allow an existing 24x40 foot detached garage to be used to
house limousines in connection with a limousine service in the
RL zone. Section 29-459 (1) by Robert Dillon, 617 Princeton
Road.
2 . Appeal #1966. Reduce the required side yard setback along the
east lot line from 5 feet to 1-1/2 feet for a 12x40 foot
detached garage in the RL zone. The garage would house a 37
foot long recreational vehicle. Section 29-133 (5) by Al
Nickerson, 2823 W. Lake.
3 . Appeal #1967. Reduce the required front yard setback from 20
feet to 17 feet for a front porch addition to an existing
single family home in the RL zone, and the street side setback
along Bungalow Court from 15 feet to 5 feet for a second-story
addition to the house. The variance would also reduce the
required rear setback from 15 feet to 5 feet for a new
detached two-car garage to replace the existing one-car !�
garage. Section(s) 29-133 (3) , 29-133 (4) , 29-133 (5) by Tim
Conine, 109 N. Washington.
4 . Appeal #1968. Reduce the required rear yard setback along they
north lot line from 15 feet to 5 feet for a new home in the
RMP zone. The house will face west, so in reality, the north
lot line acts as a side lot line instead of the rear lot
line• Section(s) 29-238, 29-133 (4) by Don Richmond, 4118
Harbor Walk Drive.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 11, 1990
Appeal #1965
---617 Princeton Road
---Petitioner: Robert Dillon, owner
---Zone: RL
---Section: 29-459 (1)
--- The variance would allow the use of a detached building in connec-
tion with a home occupation. Specifically, it would allow and
existing 24 x 40 foot detached garage to be used to house limou-
sines in connection with a limousine service in the RL zone.
--- Petitioner's statement of hardship: The petitioner has operated
his occupation out of another residence in the same manner as is
l� proposed for this property for 2 years in the same neighborhood.
He purchased this property unaware that he could not continue as
before simply because the garage was detached. The petitioner
feels that the ordinance creates a hardship to him because he is
not able to use his garage as numerous other home owners with a
business simply because it is detached. The building is also
already existing and is long enough to accommodate a limousine,
whereas most attached garages are not long enough for such
vehicles.
--- Staff comments: The Board has granted a number of variances to
allow detached garages to be used in connection with home occupa-
tions. Usually, they have been granted only when the nature of
the business makes it impractical to use the house, and the
activity to be conducted in the building will not create a
nuisance to the neighbors. The length of the vehicles used in
this business is unique, and most attached garages would not work.
Only storage of business vehicles will occur in the garage.
Office related functions of this business such as paperwork and
phone calls will take place in the house.
Appeal #1966
--- 2823 W. Lake Street
--- Petitioner: Al Nickerson, owner
--- Zone: RL
--- Section: 29-133 (5)
--- The variance would reduce the required side yard setback along the
east lot line from 5 feet to 1. 5 feet for a 12 x 40 foot detached
garage in the RL zone. The garage would house a 37 foot long
recreational vehicle.
--- Petitioner's statement of hardship: The petitioner desires to
maintain as much distance as possible between the new building and
the existing garage. Placing the building as far to the east as
possible allows for better access in that the RV can be driven
straight in and straight out. Other possible locations are not
advisable because the size of the motor home requires considerable
room for maneuverability.
--- Staff comments: None.
Appeal #1967
--- 109 N. Washington
--- Petitioner: Tim Conine, contractor
--- Zone: RL
--- Section: 29-133 (3) , 29-133 (4) , 29-133 (5)
3-0
--- The variance would reduce the required
f g sin -e
street side setback along
Bungalow Court from 15 feet tc(3 feet for a on .
to the house. The variance would also reduce the required rear
setback from 15 feet tot''® feet for a new �Qtwo-car garage
to replace the existing one-car garage.
--- Petitioner' s statement of hardship: The existing garage is very
old and in poor condition and is only 1. 5 feet from the rear lot
line. The petitioner would like to demolish it a build a new
garage. The lot is very shallow and it is difficult to build a
new one without a variance. A 2-story addition is planned for the
house and in order to achieve a character similar to the neighbor-
hood, a front porch is necessary. Since the existing house is
only setback 20 feet, any porch addition will require a variance.
The existing house is setback 0 feet from the property line along
Bungalow Court and the plan is to increase the setback to 5 feet
but build a second story.
--- Staff comments: None.
Appeal #1968
--- 4118 Harbor Walk Drive
--- Petitioner: Don Richmond, architect
--- Zone: RMP
G --- Section: 29-238 , 29-133 (4)
-� --- The variance would reduce the required rear yard setback along the
north lot line from 15 feet to 5 feet for a new home in the RMP
zone. The house will face west, so in reality, the north lot line
acts as a side lot line instead of the rear lot line.
--- Petitioner's statement of hardship: The lot is a corner lot,
wherein the narrowest of the 2 street frontages is along Maren
Cove, and that is the front lot line by definition. The house,
however, faces Harbor Walk Drive, the legal side yard. Trees were
planted several years ago along the east lot line, and the lot
when platted, was designed for the east lot line to be the rear,
with the house looking to the west with a view of the lake and the
mountains.
--- Staff comments: This is a typical corner lot situation which the
Board should be familiar with wherein the legal rear yard is in
reality the side yard.