HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/21/2024 - CULTURAL RESOURCES BOARD - AGENDA - Special MeetingCULTURAL RESOURCES BOARD
Grant Writing Workshop
October 21 2024, - 4:00 pm
Golden Aspen Room, Center for Creativity
10/21/2024 Grant Writing Workshop
1.NEW BUSINESS
a.Grant Writing Workshop “Mastering the Art of Writing Grants: Strategies for
Nonprofit Arts Organizations"
2.ADJOURNMENT
10/15/2024
1
Mastering the Art of
Writing Grants:
Strategies for Nonprofit
Arts Organizations
Presented by:
Maggie Dennis, Grant Strategist, GPC
Carrie Care, Grant Specialist, GPC
Welcome &
Introduction
City of Fort Collins
Land Acknowledgement
We acknowledge and honor the lands situated within the
City of Fort Collins as the original homelands of the
Hinono’eiteen (Arapaho), Tsétsėhéstȧhese (Cheyenne),
Nʉmʉnʉʉ (Comanche), Caiugu (Kiowa), Čariks i Čariks
(Pawnee), Sosonih (Shoshone), Oc'eti S'akowin (Lakota)
and Núuchiu (Ute) Peoples. This area is an important site of
trade, gathering, and healing for these Native Nations.
These lands are home to a diverse urban Native community
representing multiple Native Nations and Indigenous
Peoples. Despite forced removal and land dispossession,
they continue to thrive as resilient members of our
community. We are grateful for Native community members
and honor the rich cultural heritage they bring to our
collective community. We further recognize and value their
social, intellectual, economic, and cultural contributions.
The City of Fort Collins is committed to supporting,
partnering, and working with the Native and Indigenous
1
2
3
10/15/2024
2
❖WELCOME & INTRODUCTION
❖OPENING DISCUSSION•Grant Funding Challenges
•Arts Funding Landscape
❖BEST PRACTICES IN GRANTS•Trends in Arts Funding•Grant Readiness•Prospect Research
•Crafting a Winning Proposal
❖CLOSING DISCUSSION•Action Items•Future Workshop Topics?
Maggie Dennis, MA, GPC
•Born and raised in Denver
•Bachelor’s degree in Psychology
•Master’s degree in History
•Museum professional (20 years)
•Grant professional (14 years)
•Cultural Resources Board (2012-2015)
•StoryForge – serving clients in Northern Colorado
Carrie Care, GPC (she/her)
Grant Specialist
🠶Originally from Pennsylvania
🠶Bachelor’s Degrees in English & Music
🠶Nonprofit arts sector for 10+ years
🠶Grant Professional Certified
🠶Fundraising Certificate, Support Center for
Nonprofit Management
🠶Love travel, international soccer, and music
(Beethoven to Bluegrass… and everything in
between!)
4
5
6
10/15/2024
3
Opening
Discussion
● Grant Funding Challenges
● Arts Funding Landscape
Discussion Question:
What are the challenges you face in securing grant funding for your arts organization?
OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT ARTS
FUNDING LANDSCAPE
WHAT MAKES THE ARTS SECTOR UNIQUE WHEN IT COMES TO FUNDRAISING?
•Subjective Value: The value of art is often subjective and can be difficult to quantify in traditional terms.
•Emotional and Cultural Appeals: Arts organizations often rely on emotional and cultural appeals to connect with donors.
•Limited Resources and Growing Demand: Arts sector funding is somewhat limited compared to other sectors. There is growing demand for demonstrating social and economic benefits.
•Partnerships with Public and Private Sectors: Arts organizations must navigate partnerships with both public and private sectors.
•Balancing Artistic Integrity and Donor Expectations: Arts fundraisers must balance artistic integrity with donor expectations and broader societal goals.
•GOS vs. Program Support: While dedicated arts funders are a good source for GOS, program support can be obtained from a broader range of funders.
•State Arts Support & Advocacy Opportunity for Growth: Colorado’s state funding for arts is up but still low, ranked 46th in the nation and lowest among Western states.
7
8
9
10/15/2024
4
OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT ARTS
FUNDING LANDSCAPE
National
National Endowment for the Arts (NEA)
Americans for the Arts
Arts Action Fund
Stage Act*
State
Colorado Creative Industries (CCI)
Scientific & Cultural Facilities District (SCFD)
Colorado Business Committee
for the Arts (CBCA)
Think 360
Local
Public Resources
•Fort Fund/Art in Public Places
•CuRB
•Creative District
•Visit Fort Collins
Foundations/Corporations
•Private Foundations
(e.g., Bohemian)
•Community Foundation
•Corporate Foundations
(e.g., OtterCares)
What resources are available for Northern Colorado Arts Organizations?
Funders, Creative Partners, Advocacy
FUNDING
TRENDS
2023 Giving USA Annual Report:
▪Overall giving and # of donors
are down when adjusted for
inflation.
▪Foundations accounted for 19%
of overall giving.
▪Donor-advised funds are among
the fastest-growing forms of
giving.
FUNDING TRENDS
▪Arts, Culture, and Humanities comprised
4% of philanthropic giving (doesn’t count
federal) – up 11% - $25.26B.
▪Donor-advised funds are among the
fastest-growing forms of giving.
10
11
12
10/15/2024
5
Colorado
Spotlight
Fort Collins Spotlight
Economic and Social Impact of Nonprofit Arts and Culture Organizations and Their Audiences Fort Collins, CO
Source: Americans for the Arts, Arts & Economic Prosperity 6
Equity in Funding Practices
Percent of Americans
● 2.6% are Native American
● 42% are BIPOC
● 13.4% have disabilities
Percent of Philanthropic Dollars
● Receive 0.005% of funding
● Receive 8.5% of funding
● Receive 2% of funding
13
14
15
10/15/2024
6
Trends in
Grant
Funding
Understanding the Latest in the Field
Priorities, Funding Models &
Strategies: Grant Opportunities
Recent Shifts in Support for the ArtsFUNDING
TRENDS •Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Focus
•Creative Placemaking and Community Engagement
•Arts and Technology Integration
•Multi-Year Funding and General Operating Support
•Focus on Mental Health and Well-being
•Focus on Youth and Education
•Donor-Advised Funds and Crowdfunding
Priorities, Funding Models &
Strategies: Questions from Funders
Questions Found in Grant ApplicationsFUNDING
TRENDS •Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Focus
•Artistic vs. Situational Merit
•Sustainability and Resilience in the Arts
•Data-Driven Decision Making
•Collaboration and Collective Impact
16
17
18
10/15/2024
7
Grant
Readiness
Assess Your Organization’s Capacity
to Apply for and Manage Grants
Grant Readiness:
What is it & Why should I care?
•Assessing all aspects of the organization
as well as the external funding landscape.
•Creating a proactive framework that
prioritizes appropriate grant revenue goals
and research targets.
•Building relationships with grant funders by
articulating the organization's strengths and
capacity.
Grant Lifecycle:
Why do I need to be
grant-ready, anyway?
• Define Project/Needs
• Research Opportunities
• Follow NOFO/RFP Instructions to the Letter
• Submit Proposal on Time
• Wait 3-10 Months
• When Funded: Complete All Objectives, Spend
All the Money According to Your Approved
Budget
• Lather, Rinse, Repeat!
19
20
21
10/15/2024
8
Key Factors
Organizational Documentation
Grant Writing Capacity
Evaluation and Reporting
Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Sustainability and Scalability
A little context
Grants CANNOT…
BE FREE MONEY FOR
THE ORGANIZATION
HAVE A QUICK TURN-
AROUND TIME
(TYPICALLY)
BE SUCCESSFUL
WITHOUT FULL TEAM
SUPPORT
LAST FOREVER/IN
PERPETUITY
BE OBTAINED
WITHOUT
COMPETITION
(TYPICALLY)
Grants CAN…
INCREASE
CAPACITY TO
SERVE MORE
HELP MOVE THE
ORGANIZATION TO
THE NEXT LEVEL
ADD CHECKS &
BALANCES TO THE
ORGANIZATION
LAUNCH NEW
PROGRAMS/PROJEC
TS
LEVERAGE
FUNDING FROM
OTHER SOURCES
BUILD CREDIBILITY
IN THE COMMUNITY
12 Tips
Have a Current Strategic Plan
Centralize Grant Registrations
Create a Grant Team
Engage Partners in Pre‐Planning
Create Grant Seeking & Management Policies & Procedures
Create a Grant Calendar
Evaluate Your Impact
Know Your Numbers
Build a Strong Relationship with Your Elected Officials
Do Your Homework
Be Proactive
Revisit Your Grant Readiness Annually
Credit: DH Leonard
22
23
24
10/15/2024
9
Where to Start?
•Update your GuideStar profile to Gold… or
more!
•This is where funders will look for you.
•Great template for a lot of the info listed on your
Grant Readiness checklist.
•Not just Mission, Programs, Goals & Financials.
•What We Aim to Solve, How We Listen, Board
& Staff Practices and Demographics, Equity
Strategies.
25
26
27
10/15/2024
10
Grant
Prospecting
• Grantseeking Databases (free and subscription)
• Reverse Grant Prospecting
• Grant Prospecting Assessment
• Building Funder Relationships
Colorado Grants Guide
https://guide.crcamerica.org/
•Available for free at the Poudre Libraries
(ask Amanda Simental for a tutorial)
•Hundreds of profiles of funders that
support Colorado nonprofit organizations.
•Targets Colorado funders but funders are
not necessarily located in Colorado.
•Can limit search to funders to support
organizations in your county.
•Subscription:Nonprofit $250/yr;
Business/Individual $350/yr; Higher Ed $500/yr
28
29
30
10/15/2024
11
Foundation Directory Online (FDO)
https://fconline.foundationcenter.org
•Available for free at the Poudre Libraries (ask Amanda Simental for a tutorial: Nonprofit & Business Librarian)
•Free access to Essential version with a GuideStar 2024 Gold Seal of Transparency https://www.guidestar.org/UpdateNonprofitProfile
•154,000+U.S. foundations and corporate donors, and over 500,000 key decision makers (essential version). Pro version includes more grantmaker profiles, key decision makers, and federal grants.
●Subscription:Essential $450/year. $55/month. Professional $1600/annual. $220/month. Enterprise Access for 10+ users (e.g., colleagues/academic libraries).
National Banks (trustees)
● Free to search
● Serves as trustees for a variety of discretionary charitable
foundations
● J.P. Morgan: https://www.jpmorgan.com/solutions/private-
bank/foundations/online-applications/search
● Bank of America:
https://www.bankofamerica.com/philanthropic/search-for-grants
● Wells Fargo: https://www.wellsfargo.com/private-foundations
● Caution – Usually, no way to speak with the trustee; these are
blind applications
GrantStation
https://grantstation.com
●Free access with GPA membership.
●Usually $699, but can often get a steep discount on
TechSoup (under $200): https://www.techsoup.org/
●US, Canadian, and International opportunities.
●More corporate funders.
●Free weekly funding newsletter with grant opportunities
https://grantstation.com/public-resources/GrantStation-
Insider
31
32
33
10/15/2024
12
State Government Grants
•GPA CO Chapter maintains a list of state grant resources (and is advocating for a centralized database): https://www.coloradogpa.org/resources/colorado-state-grants
•Each state department has funding opportunities listed on its website - e.g. CO OEDIT https://oedit.colorado.gov/colorado-creative-industries
•GrantStation has a list of state departments with links, by subject area - e.g. Arts, Culture, Humanities
Grants.gov
https://www.grants.gov
●Federal grants are very different, and we’re not going to
cover them today.
●Clearing house for information about government grants.
●If applying for any federal government grant, you must
register and file through Grants.gov
●Explore opportunities directly on dept./agency sites
e.g., NEA (National Endowment for the Arts), etc.
Reverse Grant Prospecting
Consider Top 5 “Competitor Organizations”(Similar to your nonprofit)
●Use grantseeking databases (e.g. FDO professional) to search nonprofit organizations and the grants they’ve received.
●Evaluate if these funders could also fund your nonprofit.
●Review a similar nonprofit’s 990s to see what funding they received. https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/
34
35
36
10/15/2024
13
Assessing Grant Opportunities
Does your nonprofit/program align with the funder’s mission, values, and focus areas?
Are you eligible to apply? Do you meet the criteria?
Is the grant timeframe suitable ‐ deadlines, review period, funding start/end date?
Is the funding amount sufficient?
What are the reporting requirements?
Is there a connection to the funder?
Building Funder Relationships
•Don’t call the program officer and ask what types of projects they fund or what their deadlines are.
•Aim to connect over the phone or in-person as
well as email communications.
•It’s an ongoing process; not just centered around a grant cycle.
•Know who is responsible for cultivating relationships in your organization.
•Funders are 80%+ more likely to fund an
organization with whom they have a relationship.
Crafting a
Winning Proposal
Storytelling for Grantseekers
37
38
39
10/15/2024
14
Why is storytelling
important?
• We are already storytellers! And story listeners.
• Stories inform, instruct, and persuade.
• A good story is highly readable.
• Stories let us share our passion and creativity.
• Stories inspire others to take action.
The Story Arc
What is a “story arc”?
• Stories have a beginning, and
middle, and an end
• They have characters, a setting,
and a plot
• A good story builds tension and
offers a satisfying solution
• Good storytelling compels the
reader to keep reading
Dig Deeper
What are some common mistakes found in
grant proposals that storytelling can address?
•Lack of continuity throughout the entire proposal package
•Presentation of facts that don’t inform and inspire
•The people you serve don’t come to life – or speak for themselves
•Your “practice wisdom” doesn’t shine (because
it’s stuck in your head!)
40
41
42
10/15/2024
15
•Use the application questions to create an outline – connect the dots
•Gather all attachments first – how do they help you tell your story?
•Illustrate your artistic excellence using images, audio, video, etc.
•Use resources to build your skills (see handout)
•Grant writing is a team sport!
•Ask for feedback from grantors
•Sit in on review sessions, where possible
•Become a grant reviewer
How do I learn to use
storytelling effectively?
Pain Points
Three common “pain points” in storytelling for arts organizations:
• Sharing your impact - how what you’re doing makes a difference in our community (culturally, economically) - and how you know it’s working
• Marketing - plan, materials, data tracking, budget
• Budgets and financials (hint: they tell stories, too!)
Sharing Your Impact
Challenges:
● Intangible benefits of the arts
● Audience feedback
● Measuring economic impact
● Data collection/analysis
Strategies:
● ??
● ??
● ??
● ??
43
44
45
10/15/2024
16
Marketing
Challenges:
● What is your strategy to reach audiences?
● Quality and variety of marketing materials
● How do you know if it’s working?
● Does your marketing budget make sense?
Strategies:
● ??
● ??
● ??
● ??
Budgets and Financials
Challenges:
● Budget doesn’t align with the narrative
● Financials are inaccurate or confusing
● Budget/financial narrative doesn’t explain “red flags”
● Budget to actual shows significant variances
Strategies:
● ??
● ??
● ??
● ??
Final questions?
How will you apply what you learned today?
What other grant-related topics
interest you?
Final Discussion:
46
47
48
10/15/2024
17
Thank you
Maggie Dennis
maggiedennis@storyforgeonline.com
Carrie Care
carrie.e.care@gmail.com
49
Mastering the Art of Writing Grants: Strategies for Nonprofit Arts Organizations
October 21st, 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.
Carnegie Center for Creativity
This two-hour introductory-level presentation and discussion will focus on grant readiness, grant
seeking, and preparing winning grant proposals, with a specific focus on funders in the arts. Participants
will leave this workshop with a better understanding of best practices in grant seeking specifically
tailored to arts organizations, along with materials to take their grant writing to the next level.
WELCOME & INTRODUCTION
OPENING DISCUSSION
• Grant Funding Challenges
• Arts Funding Landscape
BEST PRACTICES IN GRANTS
• Trends in Arts Funding
• Grant Readiness
• Prospect Research
• Crafting a Winning Proposal
CLOSING DISCUSSION
• Action Items
• Future Workshop Topics?
Carrie Care, GPC (she/her), Grant Specialist. Carrie's background in English and Music inspired her to
begin her career as a fundraiser in the arts, where she has won funding from government institutions,
private foundations, and corporations, and worked with individual donors. In addition, she has worked
at Colorado State University, supporting alumni and marketing efforts. She holds the Certified Grant
Professional credential (GPC) from the Grant Professionals Certification Institute and serves as chair of
the Outreach Committee for the Colorado Chapter of the Grant Professionals Association.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/carriecare; carrie.e.care@gmail.com
Maggie Dennis, GPC (she/her), has been a professional grant writer and consultant for 14 years earned
her Certified Grant Professional credential (GPC) from the Grant Professionals Certification Institute in
2014. Prior to starting StoryForge in 2010, she had a career as a historian and museum professional at
UCLA and the Smithsonian Institution. She was a member of the City of Fort Collins Cultural Resources
Board from 2012 to 2015. Since moving to Fort Collins in 2010, she has helped local nonprofits raise
more than $12.5M to address needs in the community. https://www.storyforgeonline.com;
maggiedennis@storyforgeonline.com
RESOURCES FOR NORTHERN COLORADO ARTS ORGANIZATIONS: Funders, Creative Partners, Advocacy
LOCAL
PUBLIC RESOURCES:
Fort Fund
Funding
Funded by a lodging tax, the Fund promotes
Fort Collins as a creative hub and tourist
destination, supporting the well-being of
residents and visitors.
Art in Public Places
Funding
Provide funding to artists and arts organizations
producing works of art using visual art as their
primary source of expression.
Cultural Resources Board (CuRB)
Resources
Support and insight for cultural programs,
services and facilities constructed or operated
by the City of Fort Collins.
Creative District
Advocacy & Resources
A state-certified area in downtown Fort
Collins, Colorado that celebrates the city's
arts, culture, and history.
Visit Fort Collins
Marketing/Partnership
FOUNDATIONS/CORPORATIONS:
Private Foundations (e.g., Bohemian)
Community Foundations
Corporate Foundations (e.g., OtterCares)
STATE
Colorado Creative Industries (CCI)
Funding & Resources
Promotes, supports and expands the creative
industries to drive Colorado’s economy, grow
jobs and enhance our quality of life.
Scientific & Cultural Facilities District
(SCFD)
Funding
A tax district in Colorado that funds arts and
culture organizations in the Denver metro area.
Think 360
Funding
Serves K-12 schools and communities through
direct services and creative experiences.
Colorado Business Committee
for the Arts (CBCA)
Advocacy
Advances Colorado’s creative economy by
connecting business and the arts.
NATIONAL
National Endowment for the Arts (NEA)
Funding & Research
The largest funder of arts and arts
education in the country. It provides grants
to nonprofit arts organizations, colleges and
universities, and individual artists. Also
work with state arts agencies, local leaders,
and other federal agencies to promote arts
access.
Americans for the Arts
Advocacy & Research
Supports the arts and arts education. They
offer resources for community involvement
and support, and have an advisory group of
artists from various disciplines.
Arts Action Fund
Advocacy
Affiliate nonprofit membership organization
created by Americans for the Arts to mobilize
citizens to advocate for the arts and arts
education, and to ensure that public policies
support the arts, including a political action
committee (PAC) that supports pro-arts
candidates at the federal level.
W H Y T H E A R T S M A T T E R I N C O L O R A D O
4/2024
N A T I O N A L A R T S F A C T S COLORADO ARTS FACTS
$1.102 TRILLIION
$457.4 B
$920.5 B
The Colorado arts and culture sector was a $18 billionindustry in 2022 (3.68% of the state's GDP), representing104,163 jobs (3.47% of Colorado's workforce), and totalcompensation of $10.1 billion.
3.68%104,163State's GDP Jobs
$18 BILLION Arts & Culture
$13.5 B Mining
$18.1 B Transportation
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis & National Assembly of State ArtsAgencies (2024). Data collected for 2022.
FEDERAL FUNDING FOR THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS
Congress allocated $207 million to the National
Endowment for the Arts (NEA) in FY24. This amounts to
just 62 cents per capita. Ideally, Congress should index $1per capita funding to the NEA.
PUBLIC FUNDING RECEIVED FORCOLORADO ARTS & CULTURE SECTOR
Source: NEA, SBA, NASAA, 2024Source: Americans for the Arts Action Fund, 2024.
State Appropriation $2,023,000
NEA Federal Appropriationto State Arts Agency $943,331
Federal Appropriation $207 Million
Regional Snapshot: Pikes Peak Region
Arts & Culture
Mining
Transportation
FY24
FY24
FY24
50 NEA Direct Grants to
Organizations $4,764,273
FY23
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NON-PROFIT ARTS
& CULTURE INDUSTRY AND AUDIENCES
Nation's GDP Jobs
FOR-PROFIT & NON-PROFIT
ARTS & CULTURE SECTORS REPRESENT
FOR-PROFIT & NON-PROFIT
ARTS & CULT URE SECTORS REPRESENT
4.31%5.2 M
The national arts and culture sector was a $1.102 trillionindustry in 2022 (4.31% of the nation's GDP), representing5.2 million jobs (3.28% of nation's workforce), and totalcompensation of $540.9 billion.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis & National Endowment for theArts (2024). Data collected for 2022.
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NON-PROFIT ARTS
& CULTURE INDUSTRY AND AUDIENCES
Source: Americans for the Arts (2023). Arts & Economic Prosperity 6.
$151.7 B
2.6 M
Economic activity annually
Jobs supported by economic activity
In 2022, the impact of this economic activity generated
$29.1 billion in total tax revenue to federal, state, and local
governments.
National
$184 M
2,869
Economic activity annually
Jobs supported by economic activity
In 2022, the impact of this economic activity generated
$29.3 million in total tax revenue to federal, state, and local
governments.
Source: Americans for the Arts, 2023. Arts & Economic Prosperity 6, Pikes PeakRegion, CO
See the Colorado Arts Relief Fund Impact Report 2022
86%
88.5%
of audiences agreed with the statement“I would feel a great sense of loss if this activity orvenue were no longer available.”
of audiences agreed with the statement“This activity or venue is inspiring a sense of pridein this neighborhood or community.”
81.9%
87.2%
of audiences agreed with the statement“I would feel a great sense of loss if this activity orvenue were no longer available.”
of audiences agreed with the statement“This activity or venue is inspiring a sense ofpride in this neighborhood or community.”
E-MAIL US: ArtsActionFund@artsusa.org VISIT US: ArtsActionFund.org FOLLOW US:
COLORADO ARTS HIGHLIGHTS
JOIN THE ARTS ACTION FUND FOR FREE TODAY!
BY THE NUMBERS
THE ARTS ARE EVERYWHERE
4/2024
IN THE CENTENNIAL STATE, THE ARTS UNITE US
COLORADO CREATIVE INDUSTRIES
(CCI) promotes, supports and expands
the creative industries to drive
Colorado’s economy, grow jobs and
enhance our quality of life. We
accomplish our mission through funding,
recognition and resources to support the
creative ecosystem in Colorado.
Director: Josh Blanchard
Chair: Mizraim Cordero
Learn more here.
COLORADO BUSINESS COMMITTEE
FOR THE ARTS (CBCA) advances
Colorado’s creative economy by
connecting business and the arts. We
accomplish our mission through year-
round advocacy, research, training and
arts engagement efforts.
Executive Director: Christin Crampton
Day
Chair: Dustin Whistler
Learn more here.
Join here.
Scientific & Cultural Facilities District (SCFD)
scfd.org
Think 360 Arts for Learning
think360arts.org
Colorado is distinguished for having
significantly higher rates of attendance
at music and theater performances than
the nation as a whole.
Colorado has three of the top artistically
vibrant small and medium
communities in the nation .
Explore Colorado’s 30 state-certified
creative districts from the Western Slope
to the Eastern Plains and along the Front
Range.
Spanning 331 miles, five Colorado
destinations form a “Creative Corridor”
with wide-ranging arts and cultural
offerings, which are situated in some of the
state’s most beautiful landscapes. Nestled
in the mountains of western Colorado, the
communities in the corridor, Carbondale,
Paonia, Crested Butte, Ridgway and Salida,
offer endless itineraries for artistic
exploration.
Take an art walk! Check out the Rio
Grande ARTway in Carbondale, a hiking
and biking trail, that has been beautified
with a Latino Folk Art Garden and a Youth
Art Park, with interactive sculptures, a
woven teepee and gardens. Or, follow the
painted green line along the 40 West
ArtLine, a four-mile walking and biking art
route located in 40 West Arts Creative
District in Lakewood’s historic West Colfax
neighborhood, connecting three parks, light
rail transit, local businesses and dozens of
public artworks.
Enjoy a memorable live performance at
one of Colorado’s iconic outdoor venues
scattered throughout the state. Catch
the best of local music at The
Mishiwaka in Bellvue (outside Fort
Collins), a touring sensation at Red
Rocks in Morrison, an international
dance or jazz festival at the Ford
Amphitheater in Vail, or one of many
summer music festivals in Telluride
Town Park.
With over 300 days of sunshine,
Colorado is covered in murals and
unique street art. On the Eastern Plains,
keep an eye out for Some Girls and
Mural, who hope to paint a large-scale
mural on every grain silo. Learn out the
Pueblo Levee Mural Project, which
runs along a levee of the Arkansas
River for three miles and was certified
by the Guinness Book of Records as the
longest painting in the world. If you
happen to be in the Denver metro area
during the summer, visit the Colfax
Canvas festival in Aurora, Street Wise
in Boulder, Babe Walls in Arvada, or
numerous ever-changing murals in the
RiNo Arts District.
Colorado is brimming with history!
Museums and cultural sites tell the
story of Colorado’s indigenous heritage,
frontier days and current context. Don’t
miss the Black American West
Museum & Heritage Center in
Denver’s historic Five Points
neighborhood (considered the Harlem
of the West), the Ute Indian Museum in
Montrose, Southern Ute Museum &
Cultural Center in Ignacio, and Museo
de las Americas in Denver’s Art District
on Santa Fe, one of only a dozen Latino
art museums in the country.
What else can you find in Colorado but
nowhere else? How about the Clyfford
Still Museum and Kirkland Museum
of Fine & Decorative Arts in Denver,
Artocade (art car parade) in Trinidad,
the Tank in Rangely, and the U.S.
Olympic and Paralympic Museum in
Colorado Springs.
See the Economic Activity Study of Metro Denver culture & 2020 Colorado Creative Economy report
P a g e 1 o f 2
The Economic and Social Impact of
Nonprofit Arts and Culture Organizations and Their Audiences in
City of Fort Collins, CO
Direct Economic Activity Organizations Audiences Total Expenditures
Total Industry Expenditures (FY2022) $12,542,750 $13,495,790 $26,038,540
Economic Impact of Spending by Arts and Culture Organizations and Their Audiences
Total Economic Impacts
(includes direct, indirect, and induced impacts) Organizations Audiences Total Impacts
Employment (Jobs) 390 192 582
Personal Income Paid to Residents $11,630,569 $6,073,437 $17,704,006
Local Tax Revenue (city and county) $408,799 $612,153 $1,020,952
State Tax Revenue $386,171 $408,307 $794,478
Federal Tax Revenue $2,564,129 $1,119,683 $3,683,812
Event-Related Spending by Arts and Culture Audiences Totaled $13.5 million
Attendance to Arts and Culture Events
Local1
Attendees
Nonlocal1
Attendees
All
Attendees
Total Attendance to In-Person Events 337,738 96,372 434,110
Percentage of Total Attendance 77.8% 22.2% 100.0%
Average Per Person, Per Event Expenditure $25.09 $52.11 $31.08
Total Event-Related Expenditures $8,473,846 $5,021,944 $13,495,790
Nonprofit Arts and Culture Audiences Spend an Average of $31.08 Per Person, Per Event
Category of Event-Related Expenditure
Local1
Attendees
Nonlocal1
Attendees
All
Attendees
Food and Drink $14.68 $17.48 $15.30
Retail Shopping $2.01 $6.58 $3.02
Overnight Lodging (one night only) $0.60 $12.84 $3.31
Local Transportation $2.06 $6.38 $3.02
Clothing and Accessories $1.56 $3.24 $1.93
Groceries and Supplies $2.26 $3.52 $2.54
Childcare $0.69 $0.64 $0.68
Other/Miscellaneous $1.23 $1.43 $1.28
Overall Average Per Person, Per Event $25.09 $52.11 $31.08
Source: Arts & Economic Prosperity 6: The Economic and Social Impact Study of Nonprofit Arts and Culture
Organizations and Their Audiences in the City of Fort Collins. For more information about this study or about other cultural
initiatives in the City of Fort Collins, contact the City of Fort Collins Department of Cultural Services.
Copyright 2023 by Americans for the Arts. To learn more, visit www.AEP6.AmericansForTheArts.org.
P a g e 2 o f 2
Past studies have focused primarily on the financial, economic, and tourism contributions of the nonprofit arts and
culture industry. AEP6 expands beyond those topics to include measures of social impact. Surveys completed by
individual attendees in the the City of Fort Collins demonstrate an appreciation for how the arts and culture impacts
the development and well-being of the community and its residents.
Audiences Demonstrate Appreciation for the Impact of Arts and Culture
Level of Agreement with Social Impact Statements Audiences
“This venue or facility is an important pillar for me within my community.” 80.9%
“I would feel a great sense of loss if this activity or venue were no longer available.” 85.8%
“This activity or venue is inspiring a sense of pride in this neighborhood or community.” 85.9%
“My attendance is my way of ensuring that this activity or venue is preserved for future generations” 82.2%
About This Study
Americans for the Arts conducted AEP6 to document the economic and social benefits of the nation’s nonprofit arts
and culture industry. The study was conducted in 373 diverse communities and regions across the country,
representing all 50 states and Puerto Rico. The City of Fort Collins Department of Cultural Services joined the
study on behalf of the City of Fort Collins. For additional information including the national report, summaries for
the 373 communities, an online calculator, and a description of the project methodology, visit
www.AEP6.AmericansForTheArts.org.
Surveys of Nonprofit Arts and Culture Organizations
Nationally, detailed information was collected from 16,399 nonprofit arts and culture organizations about their
FY2022 expenditures (e.g., labor, local and non-local artists, operations, materials, facilities, and asset acquisition),
as well as their event attendance, in-kind contributions, and volunteerism. Surveys were collected from February
through July 2023. Some organizations only provided total expenditures and attendance (they are included in the
study). Responding organizations had budgets ranging from a low of $0 to a high of $375 million. Response rates
for the 373 communities averaged 43.9% and ranged from 5% to 100%. In the City of Fort Collins, 37 of the 59
total eligible nonprofit arts and culture organizations identified by the City of Fort Collins Department of
Cultural Services provided the financial and attendance information required for the study analysis—an
overall participation rate of 62.7%. It is important to note that each study region’s results are based solely on the
survey data collected. No estimates have been made to account for non-respondents. Therefore, the less-than-100
percent response rates suggest an understatement of the economic impact findings.
Surveys of Nonprofit Arts and Culture Audiences
Audience-intercept surveying, a common and accepted research method, was conducted to measure event-related
spending by audiences. Attendees were asked to complete a short survey while attending an event. Nationally, a
total of 224,677 attendees completed the survey. The randomly selected respondents provided itemized
expenditure data on attendance-related activities such as meals, souvenirs, transportation, and lodging, as well as
socioeconomic information, ZIP code of primary residence, and four social impact questions. Data was collected
from May 2022 through June 2023 at a broad range of both paid and free events. In the City of Fort Collins, a
total of 1,688 valid audience-intercept surveys were collected from attendees to nonprofit arts and culture
performances, events, exhibits, and special events during the period from May 2022 through June 2023.
Studying Economic Impact Using Input-Output Analysis
Americans for the Arts uses the IMPLAN platform to create the customized models for each of the 373 study
regions. Input-output models calculate the interdependencies between various sectors or industries within a region.
This analysis traces how many times a dollar is respent within the local economy before it leaks out, and it
quantifies the economic impact of each round of spending. This form of economic analysis is well suited for AEP
studies because it can be customized specifically to each participating community, region, or state. To complete
this analysis for the City of Fort Collins, the researchers used the IMPLAN platform to build a customized
input-output model based on the unique economic and industrial characteristics of Larimer County.
Research Notes:
1 For the purpose of this study, local attendees live within Larimer County; nonlocals live elsewhere.
1. Organizational Overview
Mission Statement: Clearly articulated mission and vision.
History: Brief organizational background, including
milestones and achievements.
Programs/Services: Detailed description of current
programs, services, and their impact.
Key Staff & Board Members: List of leadership, staff
qualifications, and Board of Directors with bios.
Strategic Plan: Current strategic plan outlining long-term
goals and objectives (preferably 3-5 years).
2. Financial Readiness
Operating Budget: Detailed annual budget with projected
income and expenses.
Financial Statements: Most recent audited financials (if
applicable) or year-end financial statements.
Funding Sources: List of current funding streams (grants,
donors, earned income, etc.).
Cash Flow: Evidence of positive cash flow or plans to
maintain financial health.
IRS 501(c)(3) Status: Proof of tax-exempt status (if
applicable).
Fundraising Plan: Strategy for diversifying funding sources,
including grants, donors, sponsorships, and events.
3. Governance & Leadership
Board Governance: Active, diverse, and engaged board of
directors.
Bylaws: Updated organizational bylaws.
Policies & Procedures: Written policies on conflict of
interest, ethics, DEI, governance, and decision-making.
Executive Leadership: Skilled and experienced leadership
with a clear decision-making process.
4. Program & Impact Readiness
Program Descriptions: Detailed descriptions of each
program or service, including target audience, activities, and
goals.
Logic Model: Clear logic model outlining inputs, outputs,
outcomes, and impact.
Evaluation Methods: Systems to measure outcomes,
success metrics, and overall impact (e.g., surveys, assessments).
Success Stories: Case studies, testimonials, or impact stories
demonstrating program effectiveness.
Collaborations & Partnerships: Existing partnerships with
other organizations, businesses, or community groups.
5. Grant Prospect Research
Funder Research: Regular research and updates on
potential grant funders aligned with mission and programs.
Funder Priorities: Knowledge of specific interests, giving
patterns, and priorities of prospective grantmakers.
Previous Grant Experience: List of successful grant
applications and amounts awarded.
Funder Relationships: Established connections or
communications with potential grant funders.
6. Documentation & Support Materials
IRS Determination Letter: A copy of your organization’s 501
(c)(3) determination letter.
Board Approval: Documentation of board approval for
major programs or projects to be funded.
Annual Reports: Up-to-date annual reports summarizing
financial health, program impact, and donor recognition.
Brochures/Marketing Materials: Professional, updated
materials that reflect the organization’s image and message.
Press & Media Coverage: Samples of positive media
coverage or recognition relevant to your work.
Letters of Support: Testimonials, partnership agreements,
or endorsements from community leaders or stakeholders.
Organizational Charts: Clear, updated organizational charts
showing staff roles and responsibilities.
GRANT READINESS CHECKLIST
7. Project-Specific Information (program/project funding)
Project Description: Clear and concise project narrative,
including objectives and rationale.
Project Timeline: Detailed project timeline with key
milestones and deadlines.
Project Budget: Itemized project budget, including cost
breakdown and funding sources.
Sustainability Plan: Explanation of how the project will
continue after the grant period ends.
Need Statement: Data-driven description of the problem or
need the project will address.
Community Impact: Description of the project's anticipated
impact on the target community or population.
Evaluation Plan: Defined methods for measuring project
success and impact.
8. Compliance & Risk Management
Legal Compliance: Current on all legal, regulatory, and tax
filings.
Insurance Coverage: Adequate insurance coverage for
operations, staff, and volunteers.
Risk Management: Policies for addressing potential risks
related to program delivery or governance.
9. Organizational Capacity
Staff Capacity: Sufficient staff and volunteer support to
carry out programs and manage grants.
Technology & Infrastructure: Adequate systems for
managing finances, data, and program evaluation.
Grant Management System: Established procedures for
tracking grant applications, reporting requirements, and
deadlines.
Data Collection Systems: Reliable systems in place for
collecting data to support grant outcomes and reporting.
10. Narrative & Proposal Writing Skills
Clear Mission Alignment: Ability to communicate how the
project aligns with the funder’s priorities.
Compelling Storytelling: Capacity to craft a persuasive
narrative that engages the reader.
Data-Driven Impact: Use of relevant data and statistics to
support the case for funding.
Grant Writing Expertise: Proven experience in crafting
winning proposals with a clear and concise style.
Budget Justification: Clear explanation of how requested
funds will be used and their importance to the project’s success.
15 GuideStar common results catalog
Sources
DataArts, Philanthropedia, GuideStar User Community
Arts and culture
Access to resources
Hours arts space has been rented
Hours arts equipment has been rented
Hours of expertise provided
Number of entities served by expertise
Dollar price per hour of expertise
Total number of awarded residencies
Broadcasting
Number of broadcast audience members
Number of hours of live broadcast
Number of pre-recorded hours of broadcast
Total number of filmmakers supported
Number of professional artists employed
Total dollars paid to artists
Creation and circulation
Total number of works developed
Total number of works commissioned
Total number of works restored or preserved
Total number of works loaned
Number of favorable critic reviews/awards of art produced given by media or peers
Number of unique podcast audience members
Education
Total number of classes offered
Number of paid registrants to classes
Number of free registrants to classes
Average dollar price for classes
16 GuideStar common results catalog
Total number of students participating in private lessons
Events
Total number of screenings held
Average dollar price of tickets to screenings
Total number of paid seats filled for screenings
Total number of free seats filled for screenings
Total number of guided tours given
Average dollar price of tickets for guided tours
Number of paid participants of guided tours
Number of free participants of guided tours
Total number of competitions held
Number of competition entrants
Average dollar price of entry to competitions
Number of competition winners declared
Total number of conferences held
Maximum number of participants allowed to attend conferences
Number of paid participants in conferences
Number of free participants in conferences
Total number of fields trips
Average price of field trip tickets
Maximum number of participants allowed on field trips
Number of paid participants on field trips
Number of free participants on field trips
Total number of audience members
Exhibiting
Total number of works exhibited
Total number of works in collection
Total number of works acquired this year
Average price for admission to exhibits (in dollars)
Number of works exhibited permanently
Arts and culture
17 GuideStar common results catalog
Number of works exhibited temporarily
Number of works on loan from others
Number of works on loan to others
Total cost of work acquired this year (in dollars)
Total number of free admissions
Total number of paid admissions
Total number of exhibitions
Performances
Total number of performances
Average dollar price for performance tickets
Total number of paid seats filled for performances
Total number of free seats filled for performances
Total number of open rehearsals
Total paid seats filled for open rehearsals
Total free seats filled for open rehearsals
Total number of free performances given
Total number of off-site performances held
Publishing
Number of books published for previously published writers
Number of works published from new writers
Number of books distributed
Total dollars paid to writers
Number of different periodicals published
Total number of periodical subscribers
Number of periodicals distributed
Arts and culture
Compiled by the Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation
Summer 2004
1
WHAT GRANTMAKERS LOOK FOR IN FINANCIAL INFORMATION
As can be expected, the level of expertise in interpreting financial reporting varies widely among
funders. What may be true for one funder may not be true for another. For some funders,
numbers alone tell the story. For others, charts and graphs make it easier to unravel the financial
picture. Still others want to sit down and get to know the nonprofit personnel and have a
discussion about the financial situation. No matter what the style of the funder, it is important to
recognize that all want to have a broad understanding of the entire nonprofit organization
including their financial condition.
Financial Information Includes:
Financial Statements (Statement of Position & Statement of Activities)
Budgets (including budget notes)
Cash Flow Statements
Audits or Reviews
IRS 990s
Accurate, timely, and consistent financial information serves many purposes:
Support for internal management
Status report for the board to help them make informed decisions
Information for potential funders
Information for potential sponsors
For use by bankers and financial institutions (loans, credit cards, etc.)
Red Flags:
• Grant requests that are unreasonably large (sometimes it does hurt to ask!)
• Requested financial information not included
• Inaccurate math
• An organization that seems to have bad or sloppy accounting practices
• Financial information that is old and out-of-date (especially internal reports)
• Numbers that are shown differently on financial statements, budgets, 990s, common grant
application cover sheet
• Financial information in improper accounting format
• Inability of staff (executive, financial, or program) to answer questions on financial
reports
• Budgets that show greater expense than income with no explanation
• Incomplete program budget (only detail is for items requested in the grant)
• Numbers that appear to be “fudged” – dropped in to make things balance
• No explanation for a large variation in the budget or a particular program area
• Program/projects that do not accurately reflect or capture overhead costs
• Buried or extremely skewed administrative costs
• Administrative and fundraising costs in excess of 25%
• Budgets that are not formally approved by the board – generally prior to the new fiscal
year
• Start-up organizations without “anticipated” budget information
• Negative cash balances
• An organization that is building rich but cash poor
Compiled by the Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation
Summer 2004
2
• Undefined debt
• Current liabilities in excess of current assets
• Unreasonable payroll liabilities (perhaps indicating taxes have not been paid)
• Uncommitted reserves in excess of 9 – 12 months operating costs
• An organization has received funding for future activities but there is not a corresponding
dollar amount in cash assets and/or receivables
• Monthly Statement of Activities without a budget comparison
• Too much support from one source
• Net “Loss” at the end of the year (without an explanation)
• Excess “Profit” at the end of the year (without an explanation)
• Unclear information on “net” proceeds from a special event
• Assuming grant income from a funder before it has been approved
• Incomplete audit reports (Notes in the back are integral part of report)
• Any audit that does not have an “unqualified” opinion
• Large organizations that do not have audits done annually
Final Recommendations:
Be accurate and honest; your organization’s reputation is on the line.
If there is bad news, don’t hide it.
Pay attention to guidelines; they can vary greatly.
Know the financial requirements of the funders, both for requests and for final reports.
Remember that a funder’s purpose is to give money away. Make the funder’s job easy, and your
organization will reap the benefit!
Grant Writing/Projects Resources
RESOURCES FOR ARTS ORGANIZATIONS
The Wallace Foundation Arts Initiatives: https://wallacefoundation.org/focus-areas-and-
initiatives/arts#current_initiatives
Arts & Economic Prosperity 6 Report & Calculator: https://aep6.americansforthearts.org/
https://aep6.americansforthearts.org/calculator?partner_slug=the-city-of-sacramento-office-of-arts-and-
culture-326
PROSPECT RESEARCH
Colorado Grants Guide: subscription-based, comprehensive database of funders that support Colorado-
based organizations. Produced and maintained by Community Resource Center. Video tutorial available
on YouTube. Available to use for free at Old Town Library and Harmony Library. Allows you to email your
search results to yourself and others. https://crcamerica.org/resources/colorado-grants-guide/
Foundation Directory Online (FDO): extensive, subscription-based searchable database to help
nonprofits find the grantmakers most likely to fund their projects. Available to use for free at Old Town
Library and Harmony Library. Allows you to email your search results to yourself and others.
https://fconline.foundationcenter.org
GrantStation: membership-based searchable database containing over 9,000 active funders, including a
wide variety of state, federal, foundation, and corporate giving programs, as well as a broad selection of
areas of interest categories. Also provides online trainings and other resources for grant seekers.
https://grantstation.com
Instrumentl: membership-based searchable database containing over 18,700 active grants and over 284,
600 private foundations. Also provides free educational webinars and resources.
Offers a 14-day free trial. https://www.instrumentl.com
Poudre Libraries Nonprofit Resources: Provides links to research databases, classes, and community
workshops. Coordinates monthly meetings of the Nonprofit Networking Group, a pilot program that
supports nonprofit organizations. https://read.poudrelibraries.org/nonprofits/z619.html
Guidestar Seal of Transparency: Claim your free Candid profile to boost your online presence. Showcase
your programs and your impact. Send fresh information to 200+ charitable sites, including Facebook, and
Network for Good. https://www.guidestar.org/UpdateNonprofitProfile
GRANT WRITING CLASSES, TOOLS, WORKSHOPS
Colorado Common Grant and Report:
● Forms: https://crcamerica.org/resources/common-grant-forms/common-grant-application
● Guide: https://crcamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/CGA_Users_Guide_Revised_6-2010.pdf
● Report Guide: https://crcamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/CGR-Users-Guide-Revised-2009.pdf
Colorado Nonprofit Association: Free to members: unlimited professional development trainings, Help
Desk, regional Grant Bootcamps, and other resources. https://www.coloradononprofits.org
Community Resource Center: Provides tools, information, training, and networking opportunities for
nonprofits. E-newsletter shares information about upcoming grant deadlines, trainings, and development
roundtables. https://crcamerica.org
Grant Professionals Association. Offers numerous resources to members, including regional chapters, an
annual conference, a consultant directory, credentialing, an e-newsletter, free webinars, and discounts on
other trainings and grant software. https://www.grantprofessionals.org/,
● GPA Colorado Chapter: https://www.coloradogpa.org/
Association of Fundraising Professionals: Member based organization with regional chapters. Over 31,000
members and 240 chapters supporting all areas of fundraising. https://afpglobal.org
● AFP Colorado chapter: https://community.afpglobal.org/afpcocoloradochapter/home
BOOKS AND OTHER RESOURCES
Browning, Beverly (2008). Perfect Phrases for Writing Grant Proposals.
Carpenter, Morgan (2023). Prepare for Impact: Everything You Need to Know to Win Grants and Super-
Charge Your Nonprofit.
Clarke, Cheryl A. (2009). Storytelling for Grantseekers: A Guide to Creating Nonprofit Fundraising, Second
Edition. Jossey-Bass.
Karsh, Ellen and Fox, Arlen Sue (2019). The Only Grant-Writing Book You’ll Ever Need, Fifth Edition. Basic
Books.
Kester, Cheryl L. and Cassidy, Karen L. (2015). Writing to Win Federal Grants: A Must-Have for Your
Fundraising Toolbox, First Edition. CharityChannel Press.
Smith, Chari (2021). Nonprofit Program Evaluation Made Simple. Author Brick Road, CharityChannel Press.
Strong Nonprofits Toolkit: Financial Management for Nonprofits:
https://wallacefoundation.org/toolkit/strongnonprofits-toolkit
Foundant Blog on Technology and Philanthropy: https://resources.foundant.com/blog
OPPORTUNITIES TO SERVE AS A GRANT REVIEWER
● The Unfunded List: The Unfunded List accepts unfunded grant proposals from organizations all
over the world to provide feedback and suggestions for improvement to strengthen their chances
of being funded in the future. https://www.unfundedlist.com/join-the-committee/
● Colorado Creative Industries: https://oedit.colorado.gov/become-a-colorado-creates-grant-
panelist
EXAMPLES OF WINNING GRANT PROPOSALS
● https://www.instrumentl.com/blog/successful-grant-proposal-examples
● https://grantstation.com/writing-proposals/samples-of-award-winning-grant-proposals
The Grant Professionals Code of Ethics
The Grant Professionals Association (GPA), a nonprofit membership association, is committed to serving the greater public good by practicing the
highest ethical and professional standards. Ethics refers to the rules or standards governing the conduct of a person or members of a profession.
The GPA Code of Ethics is based on the premise that we regard all individuals regardless of age, gender, gender identity, race, culture, disability or
ability, professional status, religion, sexual orientation, geographic location, or any other characteristic integral to a diverse and inclusive membership.
The Code of Ethics affirms an atmosphere of encouragement and mutual respect within all aspects of the grants profession. We are committed to being
an organization where our members demonstrate diversity, equity, and inclusion in all they do.
Members have joined forces to be the leading authority and resource for the practice of the grants profession in all sectors of the field. Membership
in this association promotes positive relationships between grant professionals and any stakeholders, provides a vehicle for grant professionals to gain
professional growth and development, and enhances the public image and recognition of the profession within the greater philanthropic, public, and
private funding communities.
Members, among others, are to:
• Practice one’s profession with the highest sense of integrity, honesty,
and truthfulness to maintain and broaden public confidence
• Adhere to all applicable laws and regulations in all aspects of the
grants profession
• Continually improve one’s professional knowledge and skills
• Promote positive relationships between grant professionals and
all stakeholders
• Value the privacy, freedom, choice, and interests of all those affected
by one’s actions
• Ensure that funds are solicited according to funder’s program guidelines
• Adhere to acceptable means of compensation for services performed;
pro bono work is encouraged
• Become leaders and role models in the field of the grants profession
• Encourage colleagues to embrace and practice GPA’s Code of
Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice
Standards of Professional Practice:
As members respect and honor the above principles and guidelines
established by the GPA Code of Ethics, any infringement or breach
of standards outlined in the Code are subject to disciplinary sanctions,
including expulsion, to be determined by a committee confirmed by the
GPA Board of Directors.
Professional Obligations:
1. Members shall act according to the highest ethical standards
of one’s institution, profession, and conscience.
2. Members shall obey all applicable local, state, provincial, and
federal civil and criminal laws and regulations.
3. Members shall avoid the appearance of any criminal offense or
professional misconduct.
4. Members shall disclose all relationships that might constitute,
or appear to constitute, conflicts of interest.
5. Members shall not be associated directly or indirectly with any
service, product, individuals, or organizations in a way that they know
is misleading.
6. Members shall not abuse any relationship with a donor, prospect,
volunteer, or employee to the benefit of the member or the
member’s organization.
7. Members shall recognize one’s individual boundaries of competence
and be forthcoming and truthful about one’s professional
experience, timely and accurate business practices, knowledge,
and expertise. This includes not presenting misleading credentials.
8. Members shall continually strive to improve one’s personal
competence.
9. Members shall engage professionally with peers, colleagues,
participants, and the public at large in a manner that is consistent with
GPA’s professional standards regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion,
and is respectful of all individuals.
Solicitation and Use of Funds:
10. Members shall take care to ensure that all solicitation materials
are accurate and correctly reflect the organization’s mission and use of
solicited funds.
11. Members shall, if applicable, take care to ensure that grants are
used in accordance with the grant’s intent and that timely reports
accurately describe the management of such funds.
12. Members shall obtain explicit consent from the grantor before
altering the conditions of grant agreements.
Presentation of Information:
13. Members shall not disclose privileged information to unauthorized
parties. Information acquired from an organizations’ participants is
confidential. This includes verbal and written disclosures,
records, social media, and video or audio recordings of an activity or
presentation without appropriate releases.
14. Members shall not plagiarize in any professional work, including,
but not limited to: grant proposals, journal articles/magazines,
scholarly works, advertising/marketing materials, social media, websites,
and, scientific articles.
15. Members are responsible for knowing and adhering to the
confidentiality regulations applicable to one’s specific work environment.
16. Members shall use accurate and consistent accounting methods
that conform with generally accepted accounting principles for one’s
specific work environment.
Compensation:
17. Members shall work for a salary/wage or fee. Pro bono work is also
allowable.
18. Members may accept performance-based compensation, such as
bonuses, provided such bonuses are in accordance with prevailing
practices within the members’ own organizations and are not based on a
percentage of grant monies.
19. Members shall not accept or pay a finder’s fee, commission, or
percentage compensation based on grants and shall take care to
discourage organizations from making such payments.
20. Compensation should not be written
into grants unless allowed by the funder.
bb
bb bb
bb
ff
ff
Revised June 10, 2023
10540 Marty Street,Suite 240,Overland Park,KS 66212-2596
(913)788-3000 •www.grantprofessionals.org •staff@grantprofessionals.org
GPA Ethical Decision-Making Best Practices for Grant Professionals
This Grant Professionals Association (GPA)Ethical Decision-Making Best Practices document
has been created for grant professionals to have a clear and distinct path to make ethical
decisions that reduce the risk for ourselves,our organizations,and our clients.To understand
ethics,it is first important that a grant professional differentiate ethics from morals.
Morals are the principles on which one’s judgments of right and wrong are based. Ethics are
principles of right conduct.The main difference is that morals are more abstract,subjective,and
often personal or religion-based,while ethics are more practical,conceived as shared principles
promoting fairness in social and business interactions.1
This GPA document is based on the latest research,best practices,and evidence-based theories
currently available pertaining to ethical decision-making.Identifying and evaluating an ethical
dilemma is the most critical aspect of ethical decision-making.Understanding the ethical
dilemma provides the framework and justification for the application of [best practice
decision-making](Barnett &Johnson,2010;Carson,2013;Remley &Herlihy,2016).The
identification and evaluation of an ethical dilemma draw from the application of the GPA Code
of Ethics to a dilemma.Remember to consider your own organization’s or personal framework
for ethical decision-making,if one exists.If you do not have a decision-making plan,consider
spending time on creating a plan that can be utilized for grant ethics.As Dwight Eisenhower
said,“Plans are nothing,planning is everything.”
I.IDENTIFY the Ethical Dilemma
Do you have all the relevant facts about this dilemma?Write down what is known,what is not
known,what needs to be learned,and if you have enough information to make a decision.If
you’ve gathered all the information,proceed to II -Evaluate.If not,do more research to gather
the missing facts.Consider that ethical dilemmas often arise from competing needs.What
needs are competing in this situation?Who are the individuals/groups with a stake in the
decision?…Is the decision going to be damaging or negatively impact someone or some
group?What are the options for acting?2
2 A Framework for Ethical Decision Making;Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University.Primary
contributors include Manuel Velasquez,Dennis Moberg,Michael J.Meyer,Thomas Shanks,Margaret R.McLean,
David DeCosse,Claire André,Kirk O.Hanson,Irina Raicu,and Jonathan Kwan. It was last revised on November 5,
2021.
1 The ETHICS Model:Comprehensive,Ethical Decision Making;Thomson J.Ling and Jessica M.Hauck,2016,
https://grammarist.com/usage/ethics-morals/
page 1
Approved by the GPA Board of Directors November 2022
10540 Marty Street,Suite 240,Overland Park,KS 66212-2596
(913)788-3000 •www.grantprofessionals.org •staff@grantprofessionals.org
Ask the appropriate questions of the involved stakeholders for the missing information.Once
all the facts are known,ask questions such as:
A.Does this dilemma violate any state,federal,or local regulations or laws?
B.Does this dilemma violate the GPA Code of Ethics?
C.Does this dilemma put the organization/client at risk in any way?
II.EVALUATE the options by asking the following questions2:
●Which option best respects the rights of all who have a stake?(The Rights Lens)
●Which option treats people fairly,giving them each what they are due?(The Justice
Lens)
●Which option will produce the most good and do the least harm for as many
stakeholders as possible?(The Utilitarian Lens)
●Which option best serves the community as a whole,not just some members?(The
Common Good Lens)
●Which option leads me to act as the sort of person I want to be?(The Virtue Lens)
●Which option appropriately takes into account the relationships,concerns,and feelings
of all stakeholders?(The Care Ethics Lens)
This step involves considering literature,regulations,and law that pertains to the dilemma and
combining them with analysis from the other steps.1
III.Think Ahead
After identifying an ethical dilemma,think ahead to the various outcomes of each possible
course of action.This involves evaluating each option independently to determine all
foreseeable repercussions,both positive and negative.By doing so and analyzing all
repercussions,[the grant professional]can weigh the support or lack of support for each
option.1 Review the options and their consequences,in relation to your values (honesty,
courage,good judgment,self-discipline,responsibility,respect for self and others)3
Consultation is recommended due to the sensitive nature of ethical dilemmas.Reach out to a
peer,mentor or post a question to the peer community of grant professionals on GPAs’
GrantZone with the possibility of posting anonymously,which can be found here:
https://grantzone.grantprofessionals.org/home
3 Six Steps of Health Decision Making,Mentoring for Success
page 2
Approved by the GPA Board of Directors November 2022
10540 Marty Street,Suite 240,Overland Park,KS 66212-2596
(913)788-3000 •www.grantprofessionals.org •staff@grantprofessionals.org
Ask yourself:“If someone came to me with this dilemma,what would I say?”
IV.Implement your Decision
Once you have completed due diligence for the resolution of the ethical dilemma,effectively
communicate the ethical course of action.This decision should be in alignment with evidence
gathered during all previous steps1 and demonstrate that a decision-making process was
utilized.Best practices recommend putting your action in writing in order to solidify your
decision and have a record;this could be done with a quick email or notation in your grant files.
V.Measure your Outcome
Review the outcomes of your decision-making process;debrief with a peer,colleague,or
mentor to assess the full impact of each step,not just the result.
What if you cannot resolve the ethical dilemma?Please refer to the GPA website for the Inquiry
Regarding the GPA Code of Ethics process.Remember,as one of our GPA Members,Dave Tinker
says,“Just because it is legal,doesn’t mean it is ethical”
page 3
Approved by the GPA Board of Directors November 2022
10540 Marty Street,Suite 240,Overland Park,KS 66212-2596
(913)788-3000 •www.grantprofessionals.org •staff@grantprofessionals.org
GPA Ethical Decision-Making Best Practices
IDENTIFY EVALUATE THINK AHEAD IMPLEMENT
DECISION
MEASURE
OUTCOME
A.Does this
dilemma violate
any state,federal,
or local regulations
or laws?
B.Does this
dilemma violate
the GPA Code of
Ethics?
C.Does this
dilemma put the
organization/client
at risk in any way?
A.Which option best
respects the rights of all
who have a stake?(The
Rights Lens)
B.Which option treats
people fairly,giving them
each what they are due?
(The Justice Lens)
C.Which option will
produce the most good
and do the least harm for
as many stakeholders as
possible?(The Utilitarian
Lens)
D.Which option best
serves the community as
a whole,not just some
members?(The Common
Good Lens)
E.Which option leads me
to act as the sort of
person I want to be?(The
Virtue Lens)
F.Which option
appropriately takes into
account the relationships,
concerns,and feelings of
all stakeholders?(The
Care Ethics Lens)
A.Evaluate each
option
independently
to determine all
foreseeable
repercussions,
both positive
and negative.
B.Analyze all
repercussions to
weigh the
support or lack
of support for
each option.
C.Review the
options and
their
consequences,
in relation to
your values
(honesty,
courage,good
judgment,
self-discipline,
responsibility,
respect for self
and others)
Effectively
communicate
the ethical
course of
action
Review the
outcomes of your
decision process;
debrief with a
peer,colleague,or
mentor to assess
the full impact of
each step,not just
the result.
◻Yes
◻No
◻Yes
◻No
◻Yes
◻No
◻Yes
◻No
◻Yes
◻No
page 4
Approved by the GPA Board of Directors November 2022