Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/10/2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission - AGENDA - Work Session (2)*Work session times are approximate and are subject to change without notice. David Katz, Chair Hybrid Meeting Julie Stackhouse, Vice Chair Conference Rooms C&D Russell Connelly 281 N College Ave Adam Sass Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 Ted Shepard York Zoom Webinar Planning and Zoning Hearing will be held on Thursday, May 16, 2024 in City Hall Chambers or online. Regular Work Session May 10, 2024 Hybrid Meeting Noon – 2:30 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Agenda Participation for this hybrid Planning and Zoning Commission work session will be available in-person, online or by phone. Commission members and staff may be present in-person but interested members of the public and applicant teams are strongly encouraged to participate via Zoom. No public comment is accepted during work sessions. Public Participation (In Person): Individuals who wish to view the work session in person may attend the meeting located at 281 N College Ave in Conference rooms C&D. Public Attendance (Online): Individuals who wish to attend the Planning and Zoning work session via remote public participation can do so through Zoom at https://fcgov.zoom.us/j/98698634655 Individuals participating in the Zoom session should also watch the meeting through that site. The meeting will be available to join beginning at 11:45 a.m. on Friday, May 10, 2024. Attendees should try to sign in prior to 12:00 p.m. if possible. In order to attend virtually: Use a laptop, computer, or internet-enabled smartphone. (Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio). You need to have access to the internet. Keep yourself on muted status. If you have any technical difficulties during the work session, please email kclaypool@fcgov.com. Public Attendance (Phone): If you do not have access to the internet, you can call into the work session via phone. Please dial: 1-253-215-8782 or 1-346-248-7799, with Webinar ID: 986 9863 4655. Packet pg. 1 City of Fort Collins Page 2 TOPICS: PROJECTED TIMES: Consent: 1. Election of Officers 2. February 15, 2024 Hearing Draft Minutes 3. March 21, 2024 Hearing Draft Minutes 12:00 – 12:10 Discussion: 4. East Oak Townhomes (Schumann) 5. Mulberry & I-25 Annexation (Kleer) 12:10 – 1:30 Policy and Legislation: • LUC Phase II (Keith/Beals) 1:30 – 2:00 Commission Topics: • Upcoming Hearing Calendar (Sizemore) • Commission Updates (Sizemore) • Public Engagement Updates (Myler) • Transportation Board Update (Gavaldon) 2:00 – 2:30 The meeting will be available beginning at 11:45 a.m. Please call in to the meeting prior to 12:00 p.m., if possible. Once you join the meeting: keep yourself on muted status. If you have any technical difficulties during the meeting, please email kclaypool@fcgov.com. The May 16 Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting will be held with both remote and in-person participation options. Information on remotely participating in the May 16 Planning and Zoning meeting is contained in the agenda for the May 16 meeting available at https://www.fcgov.com/cityclerk/planning- zoning.php. Members of the public wishing to submit documents, visual presentations, or written comments for the Commission to consider regarding any item on the agenda must be emailed to smanno@fcgov.com at least 24 hours prior to the May 16 meeting. Packet pg. 2 LUC Phase 2 5-10-2024 Updates and Preliminary Work 1 LUC PHASE II Packet pg. 3 June 11 Council Work Session Staff intend to share information with City Council at the June 11th Work Session on the following topics related to Land Use Code Phase 2: • Team Structure • Topics and Scope • Timeline and Sequencing • Community Engagement Strategy 2 LUC PHASE II Packet pg. 4 Anticipated Team Structure Anticipated Team Structure: • High work volume, complexity, coordination necessitates: • Specialized Project Management responsibilities balanced with Technical Lead Role •Other Key Roles Anticipated: • Dedicated Communications Team reporting to Co-PM’s • 2+ Planning Team Leads per workstream • 2+ Partner Team Leads (leads from departments outside planning per workstream) 3 Co-PM Co-PM Technical Lead Operational focus, day-to-day management Relationship and strategic focus Oversees Work Streams, provides technical expertise Work Stream Work Stream Work Stream Work Stream LUC PHASE II Packet pg. 5 4Work Streams Workstream Workstream Potential Topics: • Creating Commercial Building Types • Building Design • Recalibrating Employment & Industrial Zoning • Standards for Specific Uses • Small Business Considerations Workstream Workstream Potential Topics: • Landscaping & Trees • Site Planning & Design • Natural Resource Protection • Historic Resource Protection Potential Topics: • Transit-Supportive Development • Neighborhood Centers • Bike, Pedestrian & Trail Connectivity Potential Topics: • Micro/Minor/Major Amendment Process • Basic Development Review Process • Customer Tools & Resources Draft Problem Statement: (still under review) The current LUC lacks alignment and incentives for creating areas where residents can access housing, services, and jobs by all modes of transportation. Draft Problem Statement: (still under review) The current LUC does not provide City staff and applicants the clarity or proportional procedures to accurately and efficiently process Micro/Minor/Major Amendments and Basic Development Reviews. Draft Problem Statement: (still under review) A lack of clarity, inadequate specificity, and outdated standards create a mismatch between current policies, development standards, and outcomes in the built environment. Draft Problem Statement: (still under review) Current development standards are not aligned well to City policy goals in commercial and employment zone districts. Desired Outcomes: • Align new development standards for commercial and employment uses with policy goals • Align with policy goals related to 15-minute cities, sustainable patterns of development, economic health, etc. Desired Outcomes: • Outcomes in the built environment will reflect updated standards, policies, plans, and goals • Better align with Nature in the City and other policy goals Desired Outcomes: • More neighborhoods can access basic needs and services without a car. • More incentives to build transit- oriented development Desired Outcomes: • A simpler and more efficient process for applicants (and staff) to make basic improvements to their property. • Reduce subjectivity in development standard requirements and processes. LUC PHASE II Packet pg. 6 5Next Steps • Continue to refine Work Streams and Problem Statements with partner departments (Economic Health, FCMoves, etc.) • Strategize Community Engagement options • Establish recommendations for potential sequencing and timing of Work Streams Next Steps Prior to Work Session: LUC PHASE II Packet pg. 7 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT UPDATE Community Development & Neighborhood Services Planning & Development Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.221.6376 970.224.6111- fax Date To From Re MEMORANDUM May 16, 2024 Chair Katz and Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission Em Myler, Neighborhood Development Liaison May 2024 Public Engagement Update The purpose of this memo is to provide the Commission a monthly review of staff efforts to engage the public in Development Review as well as preview upcoming work of interest. April Public Engagement by the Numbers •Neighborhood meetings 1.The Ellie at Old Town, April 8 2.East Oak Townhomes 2nd Neighborhood Meeting for APU, April 29 Staff Update DRAFT V2 Neighborhood Meeting Purpose Statement The City of Fort Collins knows that development can have meaningful impacts on our neighbors who live, work, and play nearby. Because of this, we require many development applicants come to a neighborhood meeting where they can share their ideas with the public, answer their questions and listen to their thoughts before they submit any application for us to review. Meetings usually start with a presentation from City staff and the applicants, and then most of the time is set aside to answer questions and have a conversation about the proposed development. The neighborhood meeting is set at the beginning of a long development review process where city staff work to make sure the proposal meets our high standards for development. At the end of this review, the City then has the power to approve or deny this proposal based solely on whether it follows all our laws. If there is public input which applies to our laws, the decision maker can use it in their decision. They will be able to see notes and a video recording of this meeting, and neighbors will also be able to send them a written comment or make a spoken comment at a public hearing before a decision is made. We know that neighbors may have feelings of support and opposition to development in Fort Collins that may be part of our laws or outside them. We aim to make this a space where these can be aired. The conversation can sometimes be difficult and there may be disagreements between participants. We also know they can come at a high cost to the applicant. We promise to listen to and respect everyone’s contributions and ask for the same in return. In the end, we value the opportunity to listen and learn from neighbors and hope you do as well. Attachments: Attachment 1: Updated 2024 Neighborhood Meeting PowerPoint Template Packet pg. 8 Headline Copy Goes Here Neighborhood Meeting NAME Packet pg. 9 Headline Copy Goes Here 2 Welcome Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Planner Presentation 3. Applicant Presentation 4. Questions and Answers 5. Next Steps and Wrap Up Packet pg. 10 Headline Copy Goes Here 3 What is Development Review? Building Review Approximately 6 to 24 months, on average The Process: Pre- application conceptual conversations Land Use Approval Decision Final Plan Review Legal Recording of Final Documents Building Permit Review Legal Recording of Final Documents Building Permit Review Inspections and Completion Review by City staff Staff send revisions to applicants Applicant submits develop-ment review application Final Plans reviewed by City staff Staff send revisions to applicants Applicant submits Final Plans Building Plans reviewed by City staff Staff send revisions to applicants Applicant submits Building PlansBegin constructing public improvements Development Review Approximately 6 to 24 months, on average Gray Phase Red Phase Orange Phase Green PhaseYellow Phase Purple PhaseBlue Phase Development Review is the process where the City makes sure all land uses follow our laws and standards You Are Here Who is involved in Development Review? •Applicant team – has an idea for a new land use and creates plans to make it happen •City Planning Staff – reviews the applicants’ plans to make sure they follow our laws and standards •Other City Staff –Also review plans to make sure they follow their unique standards •Neighborhood Development Liaison –Connects the public with the Development Review process •The Decision Maker – Once staff believe the plans follow all our rules, the decision maker reviews it and grants approval if it is legal •The Public – Learns about the project and makes public comments on it to the decision maker Packet pg. 11 Headline Copy Goes Here 4 What is the purpose of Neighborhood Meetings? The City of Fort Collins knows that development can have meaningful impacts on our neighbors who live, work, and play nearby. Because of this, we require many development applicants come to a neighborhood meeting where they can share their ideas with the public, answer their questions and listen to their thoughts before they submit any application for us to review. Meetings usually start with a presentation from City staff and the applicants, and then most of the time is set aside to answer questions and have a conversation about the proposed development. The neighborhood meeting is set at the beginning of a long development review process where city staff work to make sure the proposal meets our high standards for development. At the end of this review, the City then has the ability to approve or deny this proposal based solely on whether it follows all our laws. If there is public input which applies to our laws, the decision maker can use it in their decision. They will be able to see notes and a video recording of this meeting and neighbors will also be able to send them a written comment or make a spoken comment at a public hearing before a decision is made. We know that neighbors may have feelings of support and opposition to development in Fort Collins and that some concerns may not be covered by our laws. The neighborhood meeting is a place where these concerns can be aired, and we promise to hear them. The conversation can sometimes be difficult and there may be disagreements between participants. We also know neighborhood meetings can come at a high cost to the applicant. Even so, in the end we value the opportunity to listen and learn from neighbors and hope you do as well. Packet pg. 12 Headline Copy Goes Here 5 Ground Rules •Raise hand and wait to be called on before unmuting yourself •Don’t talk over others •Ask one question at a time Respect the room •Keep an open mind •Critique ideas, not people •Give constructive feedback It’s okay to disagree, but do so with respect •Be brief and concise, time is limited •Stay focused on this project, there are other ways to engage on other City topics •Reach out to Liaison anytime to chat about questions or comments Stay focused on the topic at hand Packet pg. 13 Headline Copy Goes Here 6 Planner’s Slides Go Here •Add as many slides as you need •Try to use plain language and images as much as possible •If needed, you can run your text through a Flesch-Kincaid calculator here to determine the reading level Packet pg. 14 Headline Copy Goes HereWhat’s Next? Gray Phase Red Phase Orange Phase Yellow Phase Neighborhood Meeting Public Hearing Legal Recording You Are Here Video posted on YouTube City Review City Review Public Hearing Notices 2 weeks in advance Project information and updates available at fcgov.com/developmentreview Email or call City staff with questions or comments any time Packet pg. 15 Neighborhood Mee�ng Comments – Julie Stackhouse 5/7/2024 “Hello everyone, I have reviewed the May 2024 Public Engagement Update in the Workshop Packet, and in particular, draft 2 of the Neighborhood Meeting statement. I do not believe the current draft will produce the desired result and could even further confuse the public. Given the time that has passed, I’d like to submit the attached alternative for dual consideration at Friday’s P&Z workshop. I realize it is not perfect, but it may serve to help commissioners focus their comments.. Please let me know if this is possible to provide to Commissioners prior to the Workshop.” The City of Fort Collins knows that development can have a meaningful impact on neighbors who live, work and play nearby. For this reason, the City o�en requires a neighborhood mee�ng where the applicant can share preliminary plans for the development. The applicant will answer ques�ons from those atending the mee�ng and listen to thoughts of neighbors. The applicant is encouraged to, but not required, to include neighborhood input into its formal development applica�on when it is submited to the City. Once a formal applica�on is submited, the City ini�ates a “development review process.” During this process, staff from across mul�ple func�ons review the proposal for consistency with the City’s development standards. This includes maters such as traffic impacts, parking, landscaping, fire safety, compa�bility with the neighborhood, and more. Ci�zens can follow the progress of the proposal by (webpage URL). Ci�zens can also provide writen comments or ask ques�ons of City staff during the review process. Once the review is complete, a recommenda�on is made by City staff to the appropriate decision maker. The recommenda�on packet will include a copy of any public input. For proposals presented to a hearing officer or the Planning and Zoning Commission, there will also be a public mee�ng where ci�zens can again provide comments. In the end, the approval authority’s decision will be based on whether the proposal is consistent with City codes and regula�ons. Packet pg. 16