HomeMy WebLinkAboutNATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD - MINUTES - 03/20/2024
Page 1
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
Natural Resources Advisory Board
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, March 20, 2024 – 6:00 PM
222 Laporte and Via Zoom
1. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 PM
2. ROLL CALL
a. Board Members Present –
• Kelly Stewart (Vice Chair)
• Barry Noon
• Lisa Andrews
• Danielle Buttke (arrived late)
b. Board Members Absent –
• Dawson Metcalf (Chair)
• Matt Zoccali
c. Staff Members Present –
• Honoré Depew, Staff Liaison
d. Guest(s) –
• Xavier Pereira
3. AGENDA REVIEW
Vice Chair Stewart reviewed the agenda.
4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Xavier Pereira commented on reviewing the Our Climate Future plan and asked about
the crossover between efforts and what is being done in terms of leveraging efforts that
are symbiotic with one another. He specifically discussed building/construction waste.
Noon stated the issue of construction and remodeling waste is quite relevant and
commented on the amount of waste produced by a project near his home.
Depew noted there is a City ordinance that requires the separation and recycling of four
easily recyclable construction and demolition waste materials: wood,
concrete/aggregate, metal, and cardboard. He noted a form must be submitted to
demonstrate compliance, though compliance is an ongoing challenge particularly with
Page 2
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
smaller projects that may not have room for separate receptacles. Additionally, he
noted Larimer County has applied for a grant to fund a construction and demolition
facility that could separate recyclable materials.
Depew stated Our Climate Future has attempted to champion looking at how different
initiatives and aspects of sustainability, climate, air quality , water, and waste all fit
together and how they can complement one another. He noted Our Climate Future
helps organize and provide a strategic framework for prioritizing different initiatives.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (February)
Members commented on the level of detail provided in the minutes and concurred it has
been adequate.
Given the lack of quorum, approval of the February minutes will be moved to the April
agenda.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Building Performance Standards – Katherine Bailey (Project Manager) will
provide an overview of Building Performance Standards (BPS) and ongoing
policy development work in advance of an April 23rd City Council Work
Session. BPS are considered the most powerful and direct tool for driving
improved performance in existing buildings and are the most impactful direct
policy action the City can take to reduce emissions by 2030 while addressing
health, safety, comfort, resilience, and air quality in the built environment.
(Discussion)
Katherine Bailey, Project Manager, stated Building Performance Standards
(BPS) is a policy development process currently underway at the City. She
noted it ties into Our Climate Future as one of its main goals is an 80%
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction by 2030 target. Bailey noted the
current plans only show a 76% reduction which makes every effort important
to implement.
Bailey outlined the areas of opportunity for reaching the 80% GHG emissions
reduction, including buildings and the need to improve the performance of
existing buildings. Depew clarified the current greenhouse gas inventory
shows about 2/3 of emissions being related to buildings and ¼ related to
transportation.
Bailey outlined the direct, or regulatory, versus incentive measures , and noted
BPS are regulatory. She stated Building Performance Standards are the most
powerful direct policy action the City can take to reduce emissions by 2030
and the impact of BPS would be only slightly less than all other efficiency
programs combined.
Noon asked how the BPS policy would be kept viable if City leadership were
Page 3
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
to change. Bailey replied the standard requirements would be written into
Municipal Code as law if they are adopted by Council. She noted there is a
great deal of community support for Our Climate Future .
Bailey stated there are a number of positives that go along with building
efficiency, including health, safety, comfort, resilience, reduced energy burden,
economic growth, increased competitiveness, higher building occupancy and
tenant retention, increased productivity of occupants, mitigating utility impacts
of rising temperatures, and improved indoor and outdoor air quality.
Additionally, Bailey noted all of these positives will be more impactful to
vulnerable communities that are least able to prepare for and recover from the
negative impacts of climate change.
Noon asked if there is more the City and community can do to better mitigate
the pains that are going to be experienced by those without air conditioning.
Bailey replied BPS, at its root, is a mitigation strategy, but it is also adaptation
to future proof buildings. She noted the proposed BPS would not cover single -
family homes or mobile homes, but would apply to multi-family buildings that
are three or more stories above grade. Bailey stated the plan is to ensure
BPS work with larger properties first, then the program could be expanded to
smaller properties. Depew noted there are a number of programs specifically
targeting low- and middle-income housing, especially manufactured home
communities in terms of small grants or direct investments in efficiency
upgrades that represent both opportunities to reduce emissions and provide
adaptation and improved indoor air quality for residents.
Bailey noted Building Performance Standards are already on Council’s Our
Climate Future action roadmap and staff has put into place tools necessary to
get started as soon as the standards are adopted. She stated Building
Performance Standards, at their highest level, are any sort of target around
the performance or efficiency of existing buildings which center on flexibility for
the building owners and for the jurisdictions which vary in terms of buildings
and goals.
Bailey stated all buildings start at different levels of relative efficiency, but all
must meet the same goal by the same timeline, usually with an interim target.
She noted Denver, Boulder, Aspen, and the state of Colorado have all
adopted Building Performance Standards, and the state’s requirements apply
to buildings 50,000 square feet and above, about 200 of which exist in Fort
Collins. Additionally, there are federal Building Performance Standards and
the National BPS Coalition is the White House led initiative to get jurisdictions
to agree to adopting BPS, which Fort Collins joined in 2022 as one of the
inaugural jurisdictions to sign on.
Bailey outlined the components of work that have led to this point, including
the formation of an internal stakeholder group, a task force of industry experts ,
and a technical committee which is a body of volunteers with deep expertise in
building science and is supported by a consultant who has experience doing
Page 4
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
this work in other jurisdictions.
Noon asked who bears the cost of addressing these additional requirements.
Bailey replied we are currently in an unprecedented time of having federal
dollars available to support efficiency projects. Additionally, the City already
has a strong incentive program. She noted efficiency is the lowest hanging
fruit of decarbonization because it is cheap; it is cheaper to save energy than
to buy more energy.
Bailey outlined the equity engagement that occurred with community-based
organizations and subsidized affordable housing providers. She outlined the
work of the Climate Equity Committee which includes a number of City plans
and policies, including Building Performance Standards.
Bailey noted staff will be asking Council for a 2027 interim target and she
outlined the specific recommendations from the task force to cover
commercial and multi-family buildings 5,000 square feet and above with the
cohort of buildings 5,000-10,000 square feet having more attainable targets
and timelines. In terms of measuring efficiency, Bailey stated energy use
intensity (EUI), or how much energy is used per square foot of a building
compared to other like buildings, is being measured. Additionally, she noted
the EUI’s of all of the buildings are already known due to the City’s
benchmarking requirement.
Bailey noted resources and offramps were identified as being important and a
large amount of education must be available to building owners in order for
this to be implementable. She stated compliance with BPS is obligatory but
noted the ability to apply for target and timeline adjustments will be part of the
BPS. Bailey also noted additional resources will be available for under
resourced buildings, which the task force defined an under resourced building
as a building that has less of the resources necessary to comply than other
like buildings.
Andrews asked if the building modifications will include things like insulation
and roof and window repair. Bailey replied in the affirmative and stated
beyond 2030, things such as equipment replacement will be considered. She
stated the methodology being used for target setting is the same as that used
in other jurisdictions for interim targets because it cannot be assumed that
much equipment will need replacement between now and 2030.
Vice Chair Stewart commented on the importance of maintaining affordability.
Bailey replied it is a concern; however, many building owners have identified a
split incentive with most multi-family in that tenants have lower utility bills and
owners fund the improvements; therefore, the hope is that rents will not be
increased any more than utility bills will go down. She also commented on
pushing long-term financing structures which would live with the building
rather than the owner.
Page 5
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
Andrews asked if something like that would make it more difficult to sell a
building. Bailey replied in the negative noting the efficiency improvements
increase property values and the younger generation values sustainability and
is willing to invest in that goal.
Bailey outlined the next steps for Council, including the April 23 rd work session
and subsequent hearings for adoption, the dates of which will depend upon
Council’s direction at the work session.
Depew noted the Board could not take formal action given the lack of quorum;
however, Bailey could include the draft minutes from the meeting in her
Council packet.
Bailey stated the hope is that any pushback is a conversation about resources
and how the program can be implemented, not whether the program will be
implemented.
b. Regional Wasteshed Update: Intergovernmental Agreement and Next
Steps – Honoré Depew (Climate Program Manager) will provide context and
seek feedback for a March 26th Council Work Session to discuss approaches
to regional collaboration supporting the Council priority to Accelerate Zero
Waste Infrastructure and Policy, including a request from Larimer County to
suspend an intergovernmental agreement. (Discussion)
Depew noted the NRAB has a history of being the Board that considers
anything related to waste and recycling.
Noon asked who developed the word ‘wasteshed.’ Depew replied the term
was developed with the idea that waste does not know borders, much like
water, and adheres to geography patterns, economics, and political
boundaries if there are specific rules in place.
Depew noted this item will be considered by Council at its upcoming work
session and this is a precursor to the overall Council priority related to Zero
Waste Infrastructure and Policy and is spurred by an understanding of the
critical relationship between the City and Larimer County as well as other
regional governments. He stated staff will specifically be asking Council if it
would like to suspend an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) that was put in
place several years ago, will be seeking Council’s fee dback around what staff
should most focus on when looking at solutions for missing infrastructure for
things like construction and demolition waste and food scraps, and will be
asking Council if it is interested in getting into this in more detail with the
County Commissioners.
Noon asked who would take the initiative to approach the County
Commissioners about engaging in this topic. Depew replied they have already
suggested that might be a necessary next step as there is a policy advisory
committee for the Regional Wasteshed Coalition made up of some elected
Page 6
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
officials from each body; however, it has not been functioning at the most
optimal level lately and this year, the County has put those meetings on hiatus
until the IGA is fully suspended. Additionally, Depew noted four of the five
communities have voted to also suspend the IGA making Fort Collins the only
one that has yet to take that step. He stated there are some restrictions in the
IGA that are making the County unable to move forward in the initiatives it
would like.
Depew discussed the EPA waste hierarchy that has been adopted by Council
and is part of City Code that represents the highest and best use of waste and
places reduction ahead of recycling and recycling and composting ahead of
energy recovery with landfill being the least desirable. Depew noted the
previous Council adopted a zero waste goal by 2030, and the current status,
as of a couple years ago, shows an overall diversion rate of 52%, which
includes industrial recycling, with the residential rate around 30%.
Amy King, Environmental Services Director, noted the intergovernmental
agreement is the next step in the larger conversation with Council related to
regional wasteshed.
Depew noted the Larimer County Landfill will be reaching capacity at some
point in 2025 and noted the County has accumulated tens of millions of dollars
in landfill tipping fees over the years and has had enough of a fund balance to
be able to commit to investing in new infrastructure, including the development
of a new landfill. Additionally, a thorough Solid Waste Infrastructure Master
Plan was developed that included analysis of dozens of different types of
facilities and infrastructure that could help support the needs of the region.
Recommendations from the Master Plan were broken into three tiers for
facilities with those around diversion ranked the highest.
Depew stated each of the communities adopted the shared intergovernmental
agreement which set up a commitment from the communities to send material
to the County-built facility, specific to construction and demolition material with
the possibility of expansion. The agreement specifically precluded flow
control, the requirement that certain materials go to certain facilities, for
general waste, which was a sticking point for the County. Additionally, the
agreement included specific dates by which facilities were expected to be
constructed that have now passed. Depew noted there was some discussion
of amending the agreement; however, the County would like to suspend it and
start afresh.
Noon noted it would be a positive thing if the waste stream was decreasing
over time which makes the guaranteed material going to the facilities an
interesting paradox. Caroline Mitchell, Lead Specialist for Waste Reduction
and Recycling, noted California has been a leader in waste reduction and
recycling and has dealt with these issues before most other states. She
stated the model wherein the diversion infrastructure is funded based off the
landfill revenue creates somewhat of a ‘death spiral’ of fundin g. She stated all
Page 7
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
of the diversion facilities were modeled to be stand alone and not to have to
be funded or subsidized through the landfill in the original plan as the use of
the landfill as the sole funding hub is a problematic model.
Depew noted recycling and composting are not free and in Fort Collins those
costs are bundled with trash collection. He commented on the current
facilities and services offered by the County and discussed the three tiers of
facilities recommended in the Master Plan: diversion focused facilities, more
innovative solutions for food scraps such as anaerobic digestion, and waste to
energy conversion which landed in the third tier of facilities as being the least
desirable and least feasible, primarily from a cost perspective.
Andrews asked if there is currently a timeline for the formation of tier one and
two facilities. Depew replied that w as roughly outlined in the Solid Waste
Master Plan and was reflected in the intergovernmental agreement; however,
there have been a lot of changes to the regional market, the way that waste is
being hauled, and in personnel, leading to some changing priorities.
Depew noted the County is working on a new landfill near the Rawhide Power
Plant and is planning a transfer station, which would be a facility that could
receive different types of waste likely at the location of the current landfill
which would allow for the consolidation and transport of waste to the new
landfill site, or extract as much recyclable and compostable materials as
possible prior to going to the landfill. Depew noted the County has also been
exploring some additional uncertain options, including relationships with four
diversion partners, two of which involve some type of waste to energy in their
overall portfolios, though none of which include composting of food scraps.
Noon noted he is on the County Environmental Advisory Board which received
a presentation regarding the four competing diversion partners six to eight
months ago and asked if any progress has been made. Depew replied his
understanding is that the County is still exploring options and is trying to
understand the dynamics and relation to other communities. Mitchell stated
there are no details available as to the status of the County’s discussions with
any of the four potential diversion partners.
Depew commented on the construction and demolition recycling and sorting
facility that would hopefully allow for construction companies to take a
container of mixed waste from a construction site to be sorted and recycled;
however, at this point, the County has indicated that facility’s construction is
dependent on receiving a state grant to move it forward.
Depew further discussed the current intergovernmental agreement, the
suspension and ultimate termination of which the County has requested as the
work laid out in the IGA is not being completed. He reiterated that four of the
five of the signatories have moved to put the IGA into abeyance . He also
stated the County has not given a clear outline or timeline of what would
replace the current IGA and when.
Page 8
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
Noon noted that while no agreement is being reached, waste flow does not
stop, and the current landfill is reaching capacity very soon. He stated that
would suggest some degree of urgency to reach an agreement. Depew
replied there is a great deal of urgency being expressed by the County in
terms of trying to ensure its new investments in the landfill , transfer station,
and possibly more diversion facilities, are worthwhile as they are dependent
on a certain amount of material flowing to those facilities. He noted the
County is also requesting exploring flow control for Fort Collins garbage for the
new landfill to ensure the facility is financially viable.
Noon asked what other facilities would be options. Depew replied there are
privately owned landfills around Northern Colorado, including one in Ault.
Depew outlined considerations staff will be providing to Council for the
intergovernmental agreement which range from option one to comply with the
County’s request to suspend the agreement to no action with some options in
between.
Noon commented on the issue with having a minimum tonnage requirement
for Fort Collins to provide to the landfill given the desire to reduce waste .
Depew replied that is one of the main criticisms of instituting infrastructure for
waste to energy conversion, because those types of facilities do require a
minimum tonnage in order to function.
Depew provided additional information on flow control noting there is an
element that requires the facility receiving the material to be publicly owned
and beneficial; it becomes problematic if a community institutes flow control
and the material goes to a privately owned facility. He stated the County has
been requesting flow control for the City’s waste materials, specifically the
portion of the waste stream that is governed by the new residential single -
hauler contract. He stated staff is recommending the inclusion of the flow
control discussion as one element of all the options that can help support
accelerating zero waste pathways toward infrastructure and policy.
Depew summarized the recommended next steps based on the discussion at
the work session and discussed the questions staff will be asking Council.
7. OTHER BUSINESS
• Board Member Reports
▪ None
• NOTE: April NRAB Meeting Location Change – City Hall, 300 Laporte Avenue
▪ Depew noted he discussed holding the April meeting in an all-remote fashion
with Chair Metcalf and Vice Chair Stewart. He noted it will be the first
meeting with new members and Councilmember Ohlson will be attending.
▪ Vice Chair Stewart suggested waiting until the next agenda planning meeting
to decide if the April meeting will be fully remote.
Page 9
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
▪ Depew concurred and stated the April meeting will then either be remote or
in the CIC Room at City Hall.
• 2024 Super Issues Meetings of Fort Collins Boards and Commissions will be held at
the Lincoln Center. The dates are as follows:
▪ Monday, March 25 (Columbine Room)
▪ Vice Chair Stewart stated she and Chair Metcalf will be attending.
▪ Andrews stated she will also attend.
▪ Depew stated he would like members to connect with members of the
Air Quality Advisory Board as there may be an opportunity for a joint
meeting between the boards.
▪ Monday, June 10 (Founder’s Room)
▪ Monday, September 9 (Founder’s Room)
• In-person training for new Board and Commission members to take place in Council
Chambers on April 8th and April 22nd. Current members welcome to attend.
▪ Required: Code of Conduct and the Anti-Discrimination and Anti-
Harassment Policy.
• Depew noted this is Buttke’s last meeting after seven years on the Board and he
thanked her for her service and contributions.
• Six Month Calendar Review https://www.fcgov.com/cityclerk/planning -calendar.php
▪ Forestry Strategic Plan and Regional Wasteshed Intergovernmental
Agreement at next work session
▪ Water Supply Requirements
▪ 2024 mini BFO looking at 2050 voter-approved sales tax that can fund
climate related items
▪ Building Performance Standards
▪ Summary work plans for Council priorities
▪ Budgeting process
▪ Water Efficiency Plan
• Revisit action items from previous meetings & preview of next meeting
▪ FC Moves presentation potentially in May
▪ Unresolved as to joint meeting with AQAB
▪ April meeting: ground and welcome new members, review the work plan, and
meet with Councilmember Ohlson
▪ Board elections will be moved to June if May meeting is joint with AQAB
▪ Future Topics: Natural Areas Strategic Plan , priority around Accelerating
Zero Waste Policy and Infrastructure, Poudre River Health Assessment
▪ June meeting is being proposed to be moved due to Juneteenth holiday
▪ Noon stated most fundamental natural resources are air and water and
suggested a discussion with staff around water quality issues and trends in
water availability and water quality
Noon suggested reading the Poudre River Health report
City Websites with Updates:
• Natural Resources Advisory Board webpage: https://www.fcgov.com/cityclerk/natural -
Page 10
3/20/2024 – MINUTES
resources.php
• Our Climate Future: https://ourcity.fcgov.com/ourclimatefuture
8. ADJOURNMENT
a. 7:56 pm
Minutes approved by a vote of the Board on 04/17/2024.