Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/11/2024 - Energy Board - Agenda - Regular Meeting ENERGY BOARD REGULAR MEETING January 11, 2024 – 5:30 pm 222 Laporte Ave – Colorado Room Zoom – See Link Below 1. [5:30] CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. [5:30] PUBLIC COMMENT 3. [5:35] APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 14, 2023 MINUTES 4. [5:45] DISCUSS RATE INCREASE COMMUNICATION (Discussion, 30 Min.) Lance Smith, Senior Director, Utilities Finance 5. [6:15] DISCUSS MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL RE: PLATTE RIVER’S PLANS FOR A NATURAL GAS TURBINE (Discussion, 30 Min.) 6. [6:45] REVIEW 2024 PLANNING CALENDAR (Discussion, 30 Min.) 7. [7:15] APPROVE 2023 ANNUAL REPORT (Discussion, 30 Min.) 8. [7:45] VICE CHAIRPERSON ELECTION (Decision, 15 Min.) 9. [8:00] BOARD MEMBER REPORTS (5 min.) 10. [8:05] FUTURE AGENDA REVIEW (5 min.) 11. [8:10] ADJOURNMENT Participation for this Energy Board Meeting will be in person in the Colorado Room at 222 Laporte Ave. You may also join online via Zoom, using this link: https://fcgov.zoom.us/j/96707441862 Online Public Participation: The meeting will be available to join beginning at 5:15 pm, January 11, 2024. Participants should try to sign in prior to the 5:30 pm meeting start time, if possible. For public comments, the Chair will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Board or Commission. To participate: • Use a laptop, computer, or internet-enabled smartphone. (Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio). • You need to have access to the internet. • Keep yourself on muted status. ENERGY BOARD December 14, 2023 – 5:30 pm 222 Laporte Ave – Colorado Room ROLL CALL Board Members Present: Bill Althouse (remote), Marge Moore, Alan Braslau, Jeremy Giovando, Stephen Tenbrink, Vanessa Paul, Brian Smith, Bill Becker (remote) Board Members Absent: Thomas Loran OTHERS PRESENT Staff Members Present: Christie Fredrickson, Kendall Minor (remote), Cyril Vidergar, John Phelan, Brian Tholl, Michael Authier Members of the Public: Sue McFaddin MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Chairperson Tenbrink called the meeting to order at 5:30 pm. ANNOUNCEMENTS & AGENDA CHANGES None. PUBLIC COMMENT Randy Fischer emailed City staff a comment regarding the Riverside Community Solar Project and asked it to be read aloud during tonight’s meeting, as he was unable to attend in person or remotely. Mr. Fischer is a participant in the project and expressed his deep concern about the timeline for repairs, not just for participants of the project but for a loss of the resource and the value it adds to the community. He encouraged the Board and City staff to engage every possible resource available to reduce climate- destroying emissions and to affirm commitment to renewable energy by quickly getting a valuable, existing renewable resource up and producing power again. Ms. McFaddin implored the Board to utilize their power and voice to speak up against Platte River’s plan to explore a gas plant, or advocate for Public Utilities Commission oversight. Renewable energy is inexpensive, and the City continues to raise rates without adopting new resources. APPROVAL OF MINUTES In preparation for the meeting, board members submitted amendments via email for the November 9, 2023, minutes. The minutes were approved as amended. PURPA FERC RULING ON MUST CONSIDER LANGUAGE John Phelan, Energy Services Manager & Energy Policy Advisor Cyril Vidergar, Assistant City Attorney II Mr. Phelan briefly explained PURPA and the request for this evening, for those Board members who were not here last year when this process began. PURPA, or the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, is a United States Act passed in 1978 as part of the National Energy Act. It was meant to promote energy conservation and promote greater use of domestic ENERGY BOARD REGULAR MEETING energy and renewable energy. PUPPA has enacted many new standards over the years under Section 111(d), and a new set was most recently added in 2021 via the IIJA (Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) for demand flexibility and electric vehicles. Procedurally, this process commenced in November 2022, and continues with a public hearing represented in tonight’s Energy Board meeting, which will result in a recommendation to City Council regarding staff’s determination. The language in the new standard could be used, depending on the type of regulatory utility, for rate cases, etc. For utilities like Fort Collins, who are not regulated, the standards must be considered (“shall consider”), and to “make a determination” concerning implementation of such standards. Section 111(d) asks to consider new standards for demand response and flexibility, as well as electric vehicle charging. Mr. Phelan explained that Fort Collins Utilities is already aligned with these new standards. Formally, the staff recommendations are as follows: 1. STAFF RECOMMENDATION REGARDING HISTORIC STANDARDS in Section 111 (d) (11)- (19): Staff recommends City Council maintain current City Electric Utility policies related to those PURPA Art. I standards set forth in Section 111 (d) (11)-(19), 16 U.S.C. 2621, as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, including policies relating to net metering, time-of-day rates, renewable energy incentives, renewable energy resource integration, and interconnection standards, as amended by Council Ordinances No. 056, 2009; No. 003, 2010; No. 074, 2013; Nos. 053 and 163, 2018; No.125, 2019; No. 139, 2020; and No. 149, 2021. 2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION REGARDING STANDARD in Section 111 (d) (20): Utilities staff conducted a comparison of existing City electric utility rates and standards with the updated EPAct standards, finding the City’s electric utility operations comport with the goals of and demonstrate compliance with the updated demand response standards, determining that separately adopting the EPAct standards is not in the best interest of City electric utility ratepayers as it may be duplicative and interfere with current benefits received by ratepayers. 3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION REGARDING STANDARD in Section 111 (d) (21): Utilities staff conducted a comparison of existing City electric utility rates and standards with the updated EPAct standards, finding the City’s electric utility operations comport with the goals of and demonstrate sufficient compliance with updated electric vehicle charging standards, determining that separately adopting the EPAct standards , including shifting how marginal costs are recovered under existing rate schedules, is not in the best interest of City electric utility ratepayers as it may be duplicative and interfere with current ratepayer incentives. Board members wondered if there is value in supporting the PURPA standards to maintain that the City is clear on their commitment to its climate goals. Mr. Vidergar noted that Fort Collins is home rule municipality, and declining to act on the standards doesn’t change what work staff is already doing, However, staff recognizes that it may create an issue in the public’s perception. On the other side, adopting the language right out of PURPA would require an update to the City’s code, and that creates potential to tie our hands, limiting what can and can’t be done. Board member Smith suggested changing the staff recommendation language so that it sounds more positive, as opposed to using the phrase “not in the best interest,” which may help with the issue of perception. Board members discussed if the Utility’s rate structure (i.e. Time of Day rates) follows the spirit of PURPA’s article standards. Mr. Vidergar said it’s important to consider other policies and projects happening in the City, as PURPA is only looking at rates, which is only a portion of the larger picture. ENERGY BOARD REGULAR MEETING Board member Braslau said the City cannot hide behind the fact that the Utility has a rate structure that may support the community’s goals if it also doesn’t have the policies or oversight to back up those goals. Mr. Phelan said it’s important to remember that it is likely that rates will change significantly over the next few years due to the significant changes on the horizon, such as Platte River entering a regional transmission market, the new utility billing system, etc. Board member Althouse said PURPA is designed to bring distributed resources to Investor-Owned Utilities, but Fort Collins Utilities should be blowing past these standards. He commended Mayor Arndt for saying (in a recent blog post) that the only way to make a serious commitment of local resources in order to lower the City’s purchased power costs; the best way to lower rates is to buy less. Board member Moore moved the Energy Board recommend that City Council adopt by resolution the staff recommendations that: 1. Recognize past actions related to PURPA Article 1, Section 111 Subsection (d) standards; 2. Recognize the value of these PURPA standards (paragraphs 20 and 21 of section 111) of the EPAct standards for demand response and electric vehicle charging; 3. Separate formal adoption of the EPAct standards does not provide additional benefit to city electric utility rate payers based on current operations; 4. Council should keep in mind that ongoing consideration of policies and regulation will be necessary in order for the electric rate provisions to have their intended outcomes. Board member Smith seconded the motion. Discussion: Board member Althouse wondered if PURPA is irrelevant to Fort Collins Utilities because of the Mayor’s commitment to the deployment of local resources, and he wondered how the Board will support that commitment. Vote on the Motion: It passed, 7-1, with one absent. Board member Moore moved the Energy Board to write an addendum memo providing additional context and summary of the Board’s discussion at tonight’s meeting. Vice Chairperson Paul seconded the motion. Vote on the Motion: It passed unanimously, 8-0, with one absent. DISCUSSION OF PLATTE RIVER’S NATURAL GAS PLANT Chairperson Tenbrink said he wanted to bring this discussion to the Board and agree upon some kind of position and action they can take as a Board. He explained that as he understands it, Platte River is pursuing a closed RFP (request for proposal), as opposed to an Open RFP. He is also concerned about opening a natural gas-powered turbine given the City’s (and Platte River’s) climate goals. Mr. Tenbrink added that he didn’t realize this project was on its way to being signed off on, and why City Council did not approach the Board for feedback ahead of the decision. Board member Braslau said Mayor Ardent has said she did not receive any negative feedback about the project, but he personally reached out to her and did not hear back. Board member Smith asked for clarification about where the project currently stands, he wondered if it is already approved and signed off on by all required leadership at the Platte River Board. Mr. Minor said there was an all-renewable Open RFP that was considered for capacity for dispatchable energy that Platte River decided not to pursue. ENERGY BOARD REGULAR MEETING The RFP for the natural gas turbine is still under evaluation and has not been finalized at this time and will not be finalized until next year. When it is complete, it will be brough before the Board to discuss next steps. Board members wondered if there was still time for the process to be evaluated by the PUC. Mr. Camacho explained that Platte River is not regulated by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Platte River file their Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) through the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), as customers of WAPA. They also volunteered their Clean Energy Plan to the PUC, which supports the State’s carbon reduction goals. Platte River’s Board of Directors passed a resolution in October that gave staff direction to pursue options for dispatchable capacity based on the limitations that are already forecasted through their resource planning based on where technology currently sits with long-duration battery storage and the growing need to network out a Virtual Power Plant and the volatile intermittency of renewable energy. Based on that, staff recommended pursuing the permitting process for an aeroderivative turbine facility that does run off natural gas but would eventually be able to run off green hydrogen once that becomes commercially viable. He reiterated that staff is currently outlining the permitting process for this turbine. Board member Giovando asked why Platte River needs the turbine. Is the capacity needed to be part of the regional market, or is Platte River worried about the integration of renewables. Mr. Camacho said it is all of the above; Platte River is integrating a large number of renewable resources that will be transitioned to the base load as they retire coal-fired generation, and there is also a resource adequacy mandate for all participants in the regional transmission market. Board member Paul asked when Platte River expects hydrogen to be commercially viable. Mr. Camacho stated its an emerging technology; resource planners are working with models and researchers working on the 2024 IRP and as of right now they are anticipating it could be available in the middle part of the next decade (2030s), but that is an optimistic forecast based on where technology sits today. Board member Braslau said his fear that the ability to convert the turbine to green hydrogen is a smoke screen; he said it is not a question of economic viability but is the turbine really going to be adaptive from a materials perspective. There are so many challenges with materials, and he believes that is taking the wrong approach, he suggested distributed fuel cells as an alternative. He believes this investment is being made to be used, used to sell energy, and used to sell ancillary services. He expects Platte River will burn a lot of natural gas in the future and that is not part of the City’s climate goals. Mr. Camacho said it is Platte River’s responsibility as a generation utility to provide the reliability factor, and so they will pursue and explore options to ensure reliability for all its owner communities. Chairperson Tenbrink asked why Platte River will not be exploring the all-source RFP. Mr. Camacho said Platte River is looking at multiple RFPs, and they are all very specific to capturing as many renewable options for Platte River and its Resource Diversification Policy (RDP). An all-source RFP would look at every option possible, that could even possibly include natural gas or other carbon-emitting resources. Platte River is very specific with the types of energy sources that are needed to support the RDP. Board member Althouse said natural gas has priority for residential heating in the wintertime, and the way Platte River describes dark calm as a five-day stretch of below zero, Platte River will not be able to get gas; they will need gas storage, so he wondered what is the cost of 200MW running nonstop for five days (storage, compression, facility, etc.), so that it actually can run during the dark calm. Mr. Camacho said he does not have an answer for that offhand, so he would need to follow up with him and the Board at a later date. ENERGY BOARD REGULAR MEETING Chairperson Tenbrink proposed that he write a draft memo expressing the Board’s concerns about this effort, and he will have the Board review and vote on sending the memo to City Council at their next meeting. Board member Braslau said it would be even more impactful if some Board members could go to the Council meeting and read the memo during public comment. Board member Moore asked if Platte River didn’t pursue the gas turbine, what is the alternative option(s) during a dark calm period. Board member Smith advised it is both for capacity and for reliability. Board member Braslau believes that if Platte River is investing in the turbines, then they are going to run them; if they don’t run them then it becomes a stranded cost. He said there could be other solutions that are less financially favorable for Platte River, but they are not considering those. Chairperson Tenbrink said he is concerned that there could be scenarios when Platte River is generating enough to meet the communities’ loads, but the market has a need and so the turbines will be run to satisfy the market’s need, even if we do not need it locally. Mr. Phelan noted that what we know about the market today is that the participants are showing up with both load and resources, and they must show up every day with enough resources to cover their own load. That does not mean that those resources are going to run on any given day (save a peak summer or winter day, or similar). It remains largely an economic dispatch approach, and the challenge is that the resource planning doesn’t change going into the market, yet the operations will be very different, and that question of how things will operate remains unanswered. The City’s (and the other three cities’) relationship will change as Platte River shifts to a market representative, so how the City will help guide Platte River’s future operations (as a member of Platte River), is an open question right now. Mr. Camacho said understanding how a market will function is incredibly complex, there are specific reasons for asking a market participant to dispatch a resource. Though this market will be new when Platte River joins it, there are other markets across the nation that we can study to understand the functionality and operations. Finally, he added that the aeroderivative turbines are capable of dispatching on a moment’s notice based on the volatility of renewable generation (unlike the existing combustion turbines at Rawhide). Board members asked about short-term battery storage and Mr. Camacho confirmed Platte River is investing in the technology. Board member Althouse said batteries provide ramping time to get turbines online, if this is about power quality and instant response, there is nothing quicker than a battery that can act as a bridge. The Board agreed that Chairperson Tenbrink should draft a memo and he will send to the Board to review over the holiday break. DRAFT 2023 ANNUAL REPORT Chairperson Tenbrink explained the purpose of the annual report and advised he would be wrapping up his draft version and distributing it to the Board. He asked that each member take some time to review and add additional content as they see fit. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS Board member Braslau said the Land Use Code will be addressed at the next City Council meeting after a petition by local group Preserve Fort Collins was successful in collecting enough signatures to bring it ENERGY BOARD REGULAR MEETING back to Council. Council will need to decide to repeal the last iteration of the code or send the code to the ballot for voters to decide. FUTURE AGENDA REVIEW January’s meeting will include a final review of the Board’s annual report, a review of the Board’s draft planning calendar for the year ahead, as well as the possibility of officer elections (the Board may also decide to wait until the new Board is seated in April to hold elections. ADJOURNMENT The Energy Board adjourned at 7:47 pm. & Tips to Manage Utility Costs Fort Collins Utilities2024 RATES As a locally owned, not-for-profit utility, Fort Collins Utilities is committed to delivering safe, reliable and competitively priced electric, water, wastewater and stormwater services. Other Tips, Tricks &WAYS TO SAVE Make Your UtilitiesMORE AFFORDABLE Learn more about our affordability programs at fcgov.com/UAP. PAYMENT ASSISTANCE FUND One-time financial assistance per 12-month cycle on your past-due electric and/or water bill. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Discounted electric rate for medically necessary equipment. INCOME-QUALIFIED ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Reduced electric, water and/or wastewater rate that provides 25% off certain elements of these services. CONTACT US utilities@fcgov.com | 970-212-2900 | V/TDD 711 Aids and services are available for persons with disabilities. Esta información puede ser traducida, sin costo para usted. Optimize your energy and water use and save money on your bill with our programs and rebates. TRACK YOUR USE View detailed electricity and water use with MyEnergy and MyWater. SIGN UP FOR AN ASSESSMENT Reduce utility costs and increase the comfort of your home with a $60 assessment. RECEIVE A REBATE Rebates are available for energy and water efficiency products. FIX DRIPS AND LEAKS It’s the fastest way to conserve. PAY LESS FOR WASTEWATER Your winter quarter average (WQA) is based on water use billed January - March. Use less water December - March (depending on billing cycle) to save on wastewater costs year-round. fcgov.com/utility-rates Utilities RESIDENTIAL BILL COMPARISON The Cost of PROVIDING SERVICE Our prices are based on the costs associated with serving our customers and are adjusted through bi-annual, cost-of-service studies. We do not profit on the services we provide. Funds received are invested into our infrastructure and operations to maintain and continually improve our systems. Many factors, including fuel and wholesale costs, environmental regulations, infrastructure improvements, and changing energy and water demands, affect the costs of producing and providing utility services. When setting rates, we balance these factors to ensure safety, reliability and the best price possible for our customers. COMMERCIAL RATES Learn about commercial rates and how to manage costs at fcgov.com/commercial-rates. 2023 to 2024 2024RATE CHANGES Small, steady rate increases cover the costs of delivering reliable electric, water, wastewater and stormwater services to our customers now and into the future. ELECTRIC 5% average increase due to higher generation costs associated with new, renewable resources and capital projects like transformer and cable replacements. WATER 4% increase to help fund capital projects like pipe and meter replacements. WASTEWATER 4% increase to help fund capital projects like improvements at the Drake Water Reclamation Facility and collection system replacement. STORMWATER 3% increase to help fund capital projects like the Oak Street stormwater improvement project and stream rehabilitation. Take Control ofYOUR ELECTRIC BILL With Time-of-Day (TOD) residential electric pricing, when you use electricity is as important as how much you use. Shift your use to the lower-priced, off-peak hours or reduce your overall use to save. •Run your dishwasher in the morning, later in the evening/night or on weekends. •Use a programmable or smart thermostat to control heating and cooling costs. •Save approximately 50¢ per load by drying your laundry during off-peak hours. Crews replace storm sewer pipes to improve stormwater drainage. 2023 RATES 2024RATES % CHANGE $ CHANGE ELECTRIC 700 kilowatt-hours/month $84.20 $88.41 5%$4.21 WATER 10,000 gallons/month $51.00 $53.04 4%$2.04 WASTEWATER 4,800 gallons/month WQA $35.61 $37.04 4%$1.42 STORMWATER 8,600 sq. ft. lot, light runoff $22.42 $23.09 3%$0.67 Avg. Utility Bill Total $193.22 $201.57 4.3%$8.35 A typical residential customer, based on average annual use, could expect to see an overall increase of $8.35 per month (see chart). DID YOU KNOW? Our rates are among the lowest in the Front Range. ENERGY BOARD 2023 Annual Report January 11, 2024 2022 ANNUAL REPORT Page 1 ENERGY BOARD MEMBERS The following Fort Collins residents served on the board in 2023: 1. Bill Althouse 2. William Becker (Vice Chairperson January-July 2023) 3. Alan Braslau 4. Jeremy Giovando 5. Thomas Loran 6. Marge Moore 7. Vanessa Paul (Vice Chairperson, elected in July 2023) 8. Brian Smith 9. Steve Tenbrink (Chairperson, elected in January 2023) ACTIVITY The Energy Board held: • 12 Regular Meetings • 5 Work Sessions • 1 Memo to City Council FORMAL ACTIONS The Board took the following actions in 2023 at the meetings noted: • The Energy Board supported the appropriation of these funds from the respective utility’s reserves to support the next phase of the modernization of the utilities customer information system. (March 9) • The Energy Board supported bringing an appropriation ordinance forward for the consideration of the full City Council to support the licensing and full implementation of the modernization of the Utilities Customer Information System – Customer Self Service Portal. (July 13) • The Energy Board supported the issuance of $40 million in revenue bonds from the Electric and Telecommunications Enterprise Fund to support Light & Power capital improvement needs, which supports existing and new customers, but the Board did not feel they had enough information or the purview to support the funding for the completion of the Connexion build out. (August 10) • The Energy Board supported the proposed changes to 2024 Electric Utility rates and fees. (October 12) • The Energy Board Supported the proposed 2024 budget changes for grid flexibility programs by redeploying the funding for the budget offer originally intended to support IEEE’s 2030.5 Grid Flexibility Protocol. (October 12) • The Energy Board recommend that City Council adopt by resolution the staff recommendations ENERGY BOARD 2022 Annual Report 2022 ANNUAL REPORT Page 2 that: 1. Recognize past actions related to PURPA Article 1, Section 111 Subsection (d) standards; 2. Recognize the value of these PURPA standards (paragraphs 20 and 21 of section 111) of the EPAct standards for demand response and electric vehicle charging; 3. Separate formal adoption of the EPAct standards does not provide additional benefit to city electric utility rate payers based on current operations; 4. Council should keep in mind that ongoing consideration of policies and regulation will be necessary in order for the electric rate provisions to have their intended outcomes. (December 14) General Comment: The Energy Board, while involved in many discussions over items presented to us by city utility staff, has some concerns about the usefulness of the Board with respect to its role and responsibilities. The general consensus of board members is that the board should be more proactive and focused on issues relating to meeting the goals set in the Our Climate Future document that Council approved last year and should encourage Council to address such issues when the Board perceives a problem with meeting those goals. This issue was discussed at length during our May 11th and July 13th meetings. One outcome is that we have requested that all presentations carry a component, if applicable, that reflects how well the effort presented will promote the climate goals set for the city and how well it is doing in this regard.. 2023 WORK PLAN OBJECTIVES and RELATED ACTIVITIES In addition to the highlighted issues and the formal actions taken, the Board discussed or receivedreceived and discussed presentations on topics related to the work plan objectives and related issues. Listed below are the activities for 2023 under each of the six work plan objectives. 1. Climate Emergency a. Discussion how the Board can prioritize their impact and actions as related to the Our Climate Future Plan and Climate Emergency (May 11) b. Platte River’s exploration of an aeroderivative gas turbine (December 14). There is concern by some Board members about PRPA’s plans to build a natural gas plant which is seen as counter to the climate goals set for the city. A memo to Council is proposed for early 2024. Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 0", Line spacing: single Formatted: Line spacing: Multiple 1.15 li Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Font color: Text 1 ENERGY BOARD 2022 Annual Report 2022 ANNUAL REPORT Page 3 c. (See Objective 2) 2. Implementing Our Climate Future a. Our Climate Future Updates & Next Moves (February 9, August 10) b. Efficiency Works Homes Rebate Relaunch (March 9) c. Our Climate Future Metrics Summary & Definitions (March 9, September 14) d. 2022 Energy Services Results (May 11) e. Building Energy Scoring Impact Study & Building Performance Standards Planning (May 11, September 14) f. Discussion how the Board can prioritize their impact and actions as related to the Our Climate Future Plan and Climate Emergency (May 11) g. Building Energy Code Strategy Development Update (June 8) h. Community Wide Solar Visualization Tool (September 14) 3. Cost of Service and Rate Structures a. 2022 Year End Budget Recap (March 9) b. 2024 Rates & Fees (October 12) c. Demand Response Business Unit 2024 Budget Revision (October 12) 4. Diversity, Equity & Inclusion a. 2024 Rates & Fees (October 12) 5. Engaging Beyond the Energy Board on Related Topics a. PRPA initiatives: i. Platte River’s Integrated Resource Plan (August 10) ii. Platte River’s exploration of an aeroderivative gas turbine (December 14) b. Discussion of other City Boards & Commissions and how the Energy Board could attend and keep informed of crossover discussions (April 13). Some Board members have attended and reported back on other city board and commission meetings and we hope to continue and expand on this effort in the future.as these relate to our role. 6. Protecting Light & Power Assets & Customers a. Operational Updates (February 9, May 11, June 8, November 9) b. New equipment purchases, implication of long lead times in a rising-cost environment (transformers, etc.) (February 9) c. Discussed reserve funding management and raised concerns about using reserves for loans for non-L&P needs (Connexion). The Board drafted a memo to City Council about this matter in August (March 9, August 10) d. Customer Information System (CIS) Off Cycle Appropriation Request (March 9, July 13) ENERGY BOARD 2022 Annual Report 2022 ANNUAL REPORT Page 4 e. Federal & State Funding Update (April 13) f. Transformer Load Shaping Analysis (April 13) g. Capital Improvement Debt Issuance (August 10) 7. Ongoing Responsibilities a. Discussion of the Energy Boards Objectives/Duties and how they can best utilize their time and resources, as well as staff’s (July 13) b. Ongoing discussions and motions regarding electrification including Electric Vehicle (EV) charging, Residential Solar Panel size limitations (120% rule), Epic Homes Program c. Engaged with Platte River Power Authority for continuing advancement of the City’s energy, climate, and air pollution goals, including a 100% renewable resource mix by 2030. i. Platte River’s Integrated Resources Plan (August 10) ii. Platte River’s exploration of an aeroderivative gas turbine (December 14) d. Other items that are brought before the board. 8. Occasional or Impromptu Discussions: a. Electrification b. Platte River’s plan to join a regional Market and its local impact c. Riverside Community Solar Garden issue (November 9, December 14) d. Equity issues involving IQAP and other initiatives (October 12) e. Reviewed process of the “shall consider” requirements of PURPA under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (December 14)