Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/21/2023 - Planning and Zoning Commission - SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS -1 Katie Claypool From:Sharlene Manno Sent:Monday, December 4, 2023 11:22 AM To:Development Review Comments; Katie Claypool Subject:Fwd: Miller Mokler Property Categories:P&Z Sent from my T‐Mobile 5G Device  Get Outlook for Android  From: Jay Van Tassell <Jay@havenparkmgmt.com>  Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 10:20:12 AM  To: dkatz@fcgov.com <dkatz@fcgov.com>  Cc: Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com>; Sharlene Manno <smanno@fcgov.com>  Subject: [EXTERNAL] Miller Mokler Property   Dear Mr. Katz  We are the owners of the Cloverleaf Community located at 4412 E Mulberry. As such, we take great interest in the  development that will occur to the west side of our property, known as the Miller Mokler Property.   We are aware that Miller Mokler, LLC has submitted for annexation and zoning in the City of Fort Collins and want you to know that we strongly support that application.  We believe development of that property will be a catalyst to future  growth in the area.    Further, as you probably know, the existing access to the north side of Mulberry just east of I‐25 is not optimal.   With  the development of the adjacent land, we look forward to a realignment of that road with improved access to our  community.   Sincerely,   ………………………………………………………………  Jay Van Tassell  Director of Infill & Development  385.312.6239  |   www.havenparkcommunities.com  Mailing  |  51 W Center St. STE 600, Orem UT 84057  Offices  |  750 E Technology Ave. BLDG F 2nd Floor, Orem UT 84097  *(1(5$/ &200(17  3DFNHW SJ  From:Sharlene Manno To:Development Review Comments Cc:Katie Claypool Subject:FW: Please ignore my HOA and build as fast as you can Date:Thursday, December 21, 2023 2:36:15 PM Shar Manno Administration Services Manager Community Development & Neighborhood Services 970.221.6767 smanno@fcgov.com From: Julie Pignataro <jpignataro@fcgov.com> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:22 PM To: Brendan Long <self@brendanlong.com>; Sharlene Manno <smanno@fcgov.com>; Rupa Venkatesh <rvenkatesh@fcgov.com> Cc: Kelly DiMartino <KDIMARTINO@fcgov.com>; Dawn Kennedy <dkennedy@fcgov.com>; Ryan Mounce <RMounce@fcgov.com>; Jeni Arndt <jarndt@fcgov.com> Subject: Re: Please ignore my HOA and build as fast as you can Hi Brendan, Thank you so much for reaching out on this issue. I encourage you to reach out to your HOA president and share your sentiments if you have not already. I do not believe that the city forces creation of HOAs in any way, but I have included city staff on this response to clarify. I believe that HOAs are democratic in their structure and I know that when we had unsatisfactory leadership in our HOA (I am just to the NW of you), we voted them out. @Rupa Venkatesh Can you please create a SAR (Service Area Request) to respond to Brendan's question about the creation of HOAs within city limits? Julie Pignataro City of Fort Collins Councilmember, District 2 With limited exceptions, emails and any files transmitted with them are subject to public disclosure under the Colorado Open Records Act (CORA). To promote transparency, emails will be visible in an online archive, unless the sender puts #PRIVATE in the subject line of the email. However, the City of Fort Collins can’t guarantee that any email to or from Council will GENERAL COMMENT 2 Packet pg. 2 remain private under CORA. From: Brendan Long <self@brendanlong.com> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:11 PM To: Sharlene Manno <smanno@fcgov.com>; Julie Pignataro <jpignataro@fcgov.com> Cc: Kelly DiMartino <KDIMARTINO@fcgov.com>; Dawn Kennedy <dkennedy@fcgov.com>; Ryan Mounce <RMounce@fcgov.com>; Jeni Arndt <jarndt@fcgov.com> Subject: Please ignore my HOA and build as fast as you can Hi, I just got notification that my English Ranch HOA is using their time and money supporting political activities to prevent the city from building necessary housing. I just want to register that: 1. I don’t support this HOA in any way. My understanding is that city policies effectively force the creation of HOA’s, so there’s not any way to not be part of one. I would really strongly prefer if the city would stop doing this and let new housing go forward without forced HOA’s. 2. I don’t support this blocking of new builds in any way. I want the city to add new housing as fast as possible, regardless of what people who don’t own the land is question think about it. 3. I don’t want the city to be stuck in place historically. The campaign against new development argues that the neighbor should always remain static how it was 30 years ago, but the people who moved here 30 years ago had kids and those kids need a place to live. Thanks, Brendan Long 2639 Paddington Rd Fort Collins, CO 80525 GENERAL COMMENT 2 Packet pg. 3 ITEM 3, COMMENT 1 Packet pg. 4 COFC STRUCTURE PLAN •COFC Structure Plan has historically identified this area as open space. Current COFC Structure Plan 2016 Version COFC Structure Plan 1 JUFN!4-!DPNNFOU! 3bdlfu!qh!6 LarimerCountyCanalNo.2 Lake C a nal F o s s i l C r e e k R e s e r v o i r Dixon Cree k Richard's Lake Parkwood Lake D i x o n R e s e r v o i r W a r r e nLake D u c k L a k e New M e r c e r D i t ch CachelaPoudre Res er v oir Inl et L akeCanal ClaymoreLake Sheldon LakeC o lle g eLake LarimerCountyCanal Lari m e r County C a n a l N o 2 Sp r in g C re e k F o s s il C r eek R e s erv oir I n le t PleasantValley a n d L a k e C a n a l C a c h e la P o u d r e Ri v e r FossilCreek C a ch e la Poudre Reservoir Inlet Long P o n d R o b ert Benson Lake B o y d L a k e ArthurDitch B o x e l d e r D it c h Boxelder Ditc h TerryLakeInlet H o r s e t o o t h R e s e r v o i r D o n a th L a k e Kitchel Lake Lee Lake C a c h el a P o u d re Riv e r LittleCachelaPoudreDitchNewMercerDitchJacksonDitch L a ke Sherwood B o x e l d e r C r e e k SpringCreek C ach e l a Po u d r e R i v e r P l e a s a n t Va l l e y a n d L a k e Canal SherwoodLateral M c Clellan ds Cr eek F o s sil Creek LarimerandWeldCanal BoxelderCreek Dixon C anyon L ater al Boxelde r Creek No . 8 O u t l e t F ossil C reek TerryLake LindenmeierLake R ig den Re s e r v o i r Larimer and Weld Canal DryCreek Mail Creek Ditch SpringCreek Ha rmonyReservoir F o o t h il l s C h a n n e l Lake Canal >> > # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### # # # # > > > > S Col lege A ve W Horsetooth Rd W Mulberry St S S h i e l d s S t Riverside A v e Laporte Ave S T i m b e r l i n e R d NUSHighway287 S Le m a y A v e S t r a u ss Cabi n Rd Zi e g l e r R d S O v e r l a n d T r l 9t h S t W Laurel St W Drake Rd E Prospect R d E M u l b e rry S t W Willox Ln S T a f t H i l l R d W Vine Dr Country Club Rd E Vine Dr Richards Lake Rd WMountainAve TurnberryRdEWillox L n E Tril by R d State Highwa y 392 N C ollegeAve Land ingsDr N M a s o n S t W Prospect Rd E C ounty Road 3 8 Je f f e r s o n S t E Douglas RdCounty Road 54G WElizabethSt N L emay A ve W C o u n t y R o a d 3 8 E E County Road 50Mountain Vista Dr E Harmo ny R d N T i m b e r l i n e R d GregoryRd E Horsetooth Rd Kechter Rd N S h i e l d s S t S C o u n t y R o a d 5 W Harmony Rd S H o w e s S t W Douglas RdN OverlandTrl E County Road 36 S M a s o n S t Linc o l n A v e B o a rdwalk D r M a i n S t WTrilbyRd E Drake Rd ESunigaRd ELincolnAve C arpente r R d E Cou nty R oad 30 S U S H i g h w a y 2 8 7 S C o u n t y R o ad13 E County Road 52 S C o u n t y R o a d 1 1 S S u m m it V ie w D r S C o u n t y R o a d 7 N County Road 17 E County Road 48 N County Road 19 N C o u n t y R o a d 5 S T i m b e r l i n e R d N Taft H illRd E County Road 54 S C o u n t y R o a d 1 9 Giddings RdN County Road 9 S C o u n t y R o a d 9 !"`$ WXYZÉ WXYZô WXYZÕ WXYZÕ I³ I³ I³ Collector 2 Lanes Arterial 2 Lanes Arterial 4 Lanes Major Arterial 6 Lanes Collector 2 Lanes - Outside GMA Arterial 2 Lanes - Outside GMA Arterial 4 Lanes - Outside GMA Major Arterial 6 Lanes - Outside GMA Interstate >Potential Grade Separated Rail Crossing #Potential Roundabout City Limits Growth Management Area Larimer County CITY OF FORT COLLINS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM MAP PRODUCTS These map products and all underlying data are developed for use by the City of Fort Collins for its internal purposes only, and were not designed or intended for general use by members of the public. The City makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness, and in particular, accuracy in labeling or displaying dimensions, contours, property boundaries, or placement of location of any map features thereon. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR WARRANTY FOR FITNESS OF USE FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THESE MAP PRODUCTS OR THE UNDERLYING DATA. Any user of these map products, map applications, or data, accepts them AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, and assumes all responsibility of the use thereof, and further covenants and agrees to hold the City harmless from and against all damage, loss, or liability arising from any use of this map product, in consideration of the City's having made this information available. Independent verification of all data contained herein should be obtained by any users of these products, or underlying data. The City disclaims, and shall not be held liable for any and all damage, loss, or liability, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, which arises or may arise from these map products or the use thereof by any person or entity. N Master Street Plan forCity of Fort Collins COLORADO 0 1 2 3 Miles *Potential Grade Separated Railroad Crossings shown are top priority locations identified in the 2016 Railroad Prioritization Study, and additional grade separations will be evaluated as needed based on future conditions and opportunities. *Potential Roundabout Locations shown are those identified as good candidates in terms of need and feasibility. Prior to implementation, each location will be evaluated on a case by case basis. Additional locations for roundabouts may be considered based on design, traffic needs, and the results of an evaluation. Adopted: April 7, 2020Printed: April 17, 2020 Document Path: Q:\GIS_Data\maps\MasterStreetPlan11x17.mxd City of Fort Collins Master Street Plan Amendment: Conifer Street Collector 2 Lanes Arterial 2 Lanes Arterial 4 Lanes Major Arterial 6 Lanes Potential Grade Separated Rail Crossing Potential Interchange Streets Railroads City Limits Collector 2 Lanes - Outside GMA Arterial 2 Lanes - Outside GMA Arterial 4 Lanes - Outside GMA Major Arterial 6 Lanes - Outside GMA Interstate Unincorporated Land in GMA Outside GMA 00.065 0.13 0.195 0.26 Miles 1:7,716Scale Note: Other collector and local streets not shown will be developed in accordance with adopted sub-area, corridor, and neighborhood plans of the city. Streets and Arterials outside of GMA are shown for contextual purposes only and are not part of the Master Street Plan. The City of Fort Collins is not fiscally responsible for these improvements. CITY OF FORT COLLINS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM MAP PRODUCTS These map products and all underlying data are developed for use by the City of Fort Collins for its internal purposes only, and were not designed or intended for general use by members of the public. The City makes no representation or warranty as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness, and in particular, its accuracy in labeling or displaying dimensions, contours, property boundaries, or placement of location of any map features thereon. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR WARRANTY FOR FITNESS OF USE FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THESE MAP PRODUCTS OR THE UNDERLYING DATA. Any users of these map products, map applications, or data, accepts them AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, and assumes all responsibility of the use thereof, and further covenants and agrees to hold the City harmless from and against all damage, loss, or liability arising from any use of this map product, in consideration of the City's having made this information available. Independent verification of all data contained herein should be obtained by any users of these products, or underlying data. The City disclaims, and shall not be held liable for any and all damage, loss, or liability, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, which arises or may arise from these map products or the use thereof by any person or entity.Printed: November 21, 2013 Amended: February 15, 2011 Adopted: March 17, 1981 SH I E L D S CO L L E G E VINE DRAKE TRILBY MULBERRY TA F T H I L L OVERLAND HARMONY L E M A Y DOUGLAS TI M B E R L I N E HORSETOOTH LAPORTEPROSPECT ZI E G L E R WILLOXCOTY AD 54G CARPENTER COUNTY R O A D 3 8E LINCOLN MOUNTAIN VISTA TI M B E R L I N E TAFT HILL LEMAY LE M A Y VINE BN S F R A I L R O A D G R E A T W E S T E R N R A I L R O A D GREAT WESTERN RAILROADProposed Collector AlignmentN COLLEGE AVEHICKORY STRED CEDARCONIFER STXXX EXHIBIT A COFC STREET MASTER PLAN Current COFC Street Master Plan 2013 COFC Street Master Plan The latest version of the Master Plan shows Drake and Ziegler remaining as a 2-lane arterial (it was already built) and E Horsetooth and Strauss Cabin being upgraded to a 2-lane arterial These three roads were designated as 2-lane arterials and 2-lane collectors because they were never intended to have development east of them No where does application indicate an update to the Street Master Plan being needed. 2-lane arterial 2-lane arterial 2-lane collector 2 ,7(M  C2MM(17  PaFNet SJ  2018 8,537+8,748 = 17,285 trips 2018 8,249 + 8,226 = 16,475 trips 2018 8,903 + 8,804 = 17,707 trips TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON DRAKE & ZIEGLER Ziegler near roundabout Ziegler near curve Drake near Iowa Dr 3 ITEM 3, COMMENT 2 Packet pg. 7 The City of Fort Collins does not have parameters for street ADT capacity, however adjacent municipalities that use LCUASS, such as Loveland, have a 2-arterial capacity at 16,000 ADT. Below is a chart depicting this information from LCUASS. Neighboring Town of Johnstown also has a similar ADT capacity for 2-lane arterials in their Master Transportation Plan TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON ZIEGLER Five years ago Zielger was over these thresholds that would warrant a 4-lane arterial. 7,001-16,000 daily trips 4 JUFN!4-!DPNNFOU! 3bdlfu!qh! 2021 947+1,340 = 2,287 trips TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON STRAUSS CABIN Larimer County Rural Road Standards and The State of Colorado require dirt roads to be paved when there are more than 400 vehicle trips per day in order to protect air quality Strauss cabin already needs to be paved without this development! 5 JUFN!4-!DPNNFOU! 3bdlfu!qh!: TRAFFIC GENERATED BY STRAUSS LAKES AND OTHER FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON ZIEGLER & DRAKE 2018 Drake & Ziegler Counts average = 17,155 trips Strauss Lakes Estimate8,500 trips Community Park??? trips Ziegler-Corbett ODP700 dwelling units Can Ziegler be widened to a 4-lane arterial without a ditch realignment? How would Drake Road be widened between Miles House and Illinois Dr? ADT Volumes well over 30,000 which warrants a 4-lane arterial Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Policy Plan • Community parks serve large residential areas of the city • Fort Collins has larger parks well-distributed throughout the City. Each of these parks serves a wide variety of uses, both for nearby neighbors and city-wide residents. • the uniqueness of each park encourages residents to explore parts of the City beyond their immediate neighborhood. + + + = Existing Canal 6 JUFN!4-!DPNNFOU! 3bdlfu!qh!21 FAILING ROUNDABOUT AT ZIEGLER AND HORSETOOTH • The round about at Ziegler and Horsetooth is failing already. • This roundabout currently backs southbound traffic up to Percheron (1,400 LF) and sometimes to almost William Neal Pkwy (2,700 LF) Traffic Counts: When intersections and roundabouts back up they do not reflect actual LOS because they are not moving. TIS should address this. Example: Lemay and Vine came back as operating as a LOS C when in fact it was a LOS F Safety Analysis and Crash Data should be explored from Ziegler roundabout to Timberline Road City never anticipated the volumes of traffic we see on Drake and Ziegler This roundabout is brought up nationwide by traffic engineers as an example of one that does not work! Potential new signal 7 JUFN!4-!DPNNFOU! 3bdlfu!qh!22 FAILING ROUNDABOUT AT ZIEGLER AND HORSETOOTH AND VEHICLE STAKING ISSUES Percheron Dr Percheron Dr 8 ITEM 3, COMMENT 2 Packet pg. 12 4, 1 5 0 L F 1. 3 M I L E S 1.3 MILES POTENTIAL NEW SIGNAL CSU SIGNAL PLACEMENT 9 ITEM 3, COMMENT 2 Packet pg. 13 ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO ANNEXATION • Can Drake and Ziegler be brought up to a 4-lane arterial beyond the boundaries of this development to support it? Is this capital improvement money? • Drake will carry a significant amount of traffic up to CSU, to grocery store etc as a primary road into Fort Collins, not expanding between the project and Illinois Dr creates a bottleneck of lanes that will only further compound the issues at the curve with subdivision entrances. • Is East Horsetooth and Strauss Cabin Road to be paved by capital improvement money or this development or a share? • The COFC Structure Plan as of today indicates only open space adjacent to these roads so no development will be making the infrastructure improvements • How will safety and Intersection Level of Service be equitably addressed for left turns coming out of Bucking Horse, Rigden Farm and potential CSU Housing along Ziegler? • Will the roundabout be reconstructed or a new signalized intersection be built to function properly? 10 JUFN!4-!DPNNFOU! 3bdlfu!qh!2