Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/20/2023 - Transportation Board - Agenda - Regular Meeting (2)12/20/2023 Agenda Page 1 Transportation Board Meeting SUMMARY AGENDA Wednesday, December 20th, 2023, 6:00 PM Online via Zoom or in Person at 281 N. College Avenue This hybrid Transportation Board meeting will be conducted in person at 281 N College Ave, 1st floor conference rooms or you may join on-line via Zoom. Participants should join at least 5 minutes prior to the 6:00 p.m. start time. ONLINE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: You will need an internet connection on a laptop, computer, or smartphone, and may join the meeting through Zoom at https://us06web.zoom.us/join Webinar ID:992 3667 9837, Passcode 735155. Keep yourself on muted status. For public comments, the Chairperson will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to comment. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION BY PHONE: Please dial +1-719-359-4580 and enter Meeting ID 99236679837; Passcode 73515. Keep yourself on muted status. For public comments, when the Chair asks participants to click the “Raise Hand” button if they wish to speak, phone participants will need to press *9 to do this. Staff will be moderating the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Transportation Board. When you are called, press *6 to unmute yourself. Documents to Share: Any document or presentation a member of the public wishes to provide to the Transportation Board for its consideration must be emailed to aiverson@fcgov.com at least 24 hours before the meeting. Provide Comments via Email: Individuals who are uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or participate by phone are encouraged to participate by emailing comments to aiverson@fcgov.com at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. If your comments are specific to any of the discussion items on the agenda, please indicate that in the subject line of your email. Staff will ensure your comments are provided to the Transportation Board. 12/20/2023 Agenda Page 2 Transportation Board Meeting SUMMARY AGENDA Wednesday, December 20th, 2023, 6:00 PM Online via Zoom or in Person at 281 N. College Avenue AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. AGENDA REVIEW 4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (NOVEMBER 2023) 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Street Standards and Roundabouts, Information and Discussion (Brad Buckman, Tyler Stamey, Aaron Iverson, 1 hour) 8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS 9. OTHER BUSINESS a. Bicycle Advisory Committee Report b. City Council 6 Month Calendar Review c. Staff Liaison Report 10. ADJOURNMENT TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR November 15, 2023, 6:00 p.m. Virtual Meeting Via Zoom 1 1 /1 5 /202 3 – MINUTES Page 1 FOR REFERENCE: Chair: Cari Brown Vice Chair: Council Liaison: Ed Peyronnin Emily Francis Staff Liaison: Aaron Iverson 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Brown called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. 2. ROLL CALL BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Cari Brown, Chair Ed Peyronnin, Vice Chair Nathalie Rachline James Burtis Indy Hart Jess Dyrdahl Stephanie Blochowiak BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Jerry Gavaldon CITY STAFF PRESENT: Adelle McDaniel Kaley Zeisel Eric Keselburg Drew Brooks PUBLIC PRESENT: None 3. AGENDA REVIEW Iverson stated there were no changes to the published agenda. 4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION None. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – OCTOBER 2023 Hart made a motion, seconded by Dyrdahl, to approve the October 2023 minutes as written. Yeas: Brown, Peyronnin, Rachline, Burtis, Hart, Dyrdahl, and Blochowiak. Nays: none. TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 1 1 /1 5 /2023 – MINUTES Page 2 THE MOTION CARRIED. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 7. NEW BUSINESS a. VMT/Climate Update, Transfort Update – Adelle McDaniel, Kaley Zeisel Adelle McDaniel, Environmental Services Senior Sustainability Specialist, discussed Our Climate Future noting it is the integration of three former community plans: the Climate Action Plan, Energy Policy, and Road to Zero Waste. She specifically noted two big moves that were raised as part of the public outreach for Our Climate Future: convenient transportation choices and live, work, play nearby, and noted next moves are strategies and actions that fall underneath each of the big moves. McDaniel discussed the relationship between vehicle miles travelled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions over time and noted greenhouse gas emissions are not increasing as quickly as they once were due to more efficient vehicles; however, VMT are again increasing since pandemic levels dropped off. She stated the increase in electric vehicles has yet to help decrease emissions given that the city’s electricity is not produced from fully renewable sources. Hart stated a large part of the overall environmental impact of greenhouse gas emissions is due to large scale industry emissions and asked how those impacts are being considered in addition to the impacts of individual citizens. McDaniel concurred that systemic and institutional changes are needed and stated she would address the topic in the presentation. Rachline expressed concern about the upward trend in vehicle miles travelled and asked what is being done to encourage actionable changes and a decrease in car use. She stated VMT needs to be decreased drastically to reduce greenhouse gas emissions drastically. Burtis requested clarification on the VMT versus greenhouse gas emissions data . McDaniel replied it specifically relates to emissions produced by vehicles owned and operated by people living in Fort Collins. He stated it would be interesting to see what percentage of total emissions is accounted for by vehicles. McDaniel replied transportation accounts for 20-25% of total community emissions and electricity is approximately 50% due to coal and natural gas still being part of electricity generation; however, that number is decreasing with the goal of 100% renewable electricity by 2030. McDaniel went on to discuss overall community emissions which include electricity, natural gas, waste produced within city boundaries, transportation within city TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 1 1 /1 5 /2023 – MINUTES Page 3 boundaries, industrial process and product use, and water emissions. She noted all goals are compared against the 2005 baseline numbers and the 2020 goal was 20% reduction, 2026 goal is 50% reduction, and 2030 goal is 80% reduction. She discussed the impact of the Our Climate Future strategies noting the forecast is that the community could be at a 76% reduction below 2005 by 2030 by utilizing those strategies and if things go as planned. McDaniel outlined the pathways or bundles of next moves to get to the 76% reduction outlined in Our Climate Future: electricity, buildings, industrial processes, transportation, waste, and land use. Rachline asked if objectives exist to get to the 80% reduction number. McDaniel replied there are a series of strategies within each big move that is part of Our Climate Future and attempts were made to quantify the impact of each of those strategies on the overall reduction number. Rachline stated the plan seems to only reach a 76% reduction, not 80%. She stated more aggressive actions must be taken in order to reach the 80% number given that the plan only provides strategies to get to 76%. McDaniel concurred a plan needs to be made to get to 80% and plans and actions will continue to that end between now and 2030. Rachline stated the only win would be to reach the stated 80% objective. Burtis asked if the target goals were set in 2015. McDaniel replied in the affirmative and stated the baseline numbers were from 2005. McDaniel noted the estimates on how strategies will impact emissions numbers were made conservatively and some of the strategies were not quantified given a lack of confidence in actual impacts. She outlined the next steps under the area of transportation, including continuing to build bicycle facilities as identified in the Active Modes Plan. Chair Brown asked about the definition of transportation demand management. Iverson replied it is an umbrella term for a lot of the work done to target reduction in people driving alone in vehicles, including carpooling, vanpooling, transit, walking , biking, and working with employers to have them encourage the same actions. Rachline commented on the numbers indicating building bicycle facilities generates more avoidance of emissions than other items. McDaniel noted some assumptions were made around how much people are willing and able to bike around the community because Fort Collins is already quite bicycle-friendly. In terms of land use strategies, McDaniel discussed 15 -minute neighborhoods. She noted there is a great deal of research from other communities about the importance of the 15-minute neighborhood strategy. Incorporating the concept shortens the distance between housing a people’s daily needs, reduces building energy use and water consumption by allowing attached and multi-family housing types, and curbs sprawl and preserves land to serve other needs and functions such as farming, TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 1 1 /1 5 /2023 – MINUTES Page 4 forestry, wilderness, conservation, and carbon sequestration. McDaniel commented on the strategies that were not quantified, but are still critical, including travel trainings, school partnerships, a more variable demand transit system, a regional transit system, increasing density and mixed-uses, and expanding walkable and accessible infrastructure. Blochowiak asked what kinds of things are encompassed in bicycle facilities. Iverson replied it includes all of the bicycle network, including the paved trail system, bike lanes, and the low-stress bikeway. He stated the next stage is additional protected bicycle facilities. Chair Brown discussed Vice Chair Peyronnin’s comments about a study that indicates installing roundabouts can improve emissions because of more efficient movement of traffic. She requested additional detail about where something like that would fit in terms of next moves. McDaniel replied it could fit in the Transportation Master Plan or as a strategy within Our Climate Future. Hart noted this presentation was a selection of what is being done to reduce emissions overall and items were selected based on relationship to the Transportation Board and its purview. McDaniel concurred with that assessment. Hart agreed he would like to include roundabouts in the strategies and stated a goal needs to be creating a community wherein kids can get to school and go places after school thereby decreasing parent car trips. He also stated 15-minute communities need to be safe, convenient, and easy. He commented on the importance of making desired behaviors easier than undesired behaviors. Rachline concurred with Hart regarding the vehicle miles travelled to and from schools. She stated she has yet to see specific strategies related to the reduction of VMT. McDaniel replied reduction in VMT is an intermediate step in the calculations that were resulting in the emissions numbers. Kaley Zeisel, Transfort Interim Director, stated Transfort ridership exploded after the introduction of MAX and it was at an all-time high in 2019. During the pandemic, service levels were reduced and ridership plummeted, though ridership has been slowly increasing since 2021 due in part to some return in service, including Friday and Saturday evening MAX service. Zeisel noted bus operator staffing levels followed a similar pattern to ridership with a decrease in operators post-pandemic with the lowest levels in 2022. She stated Transfort is fully staffed at 108 operators and there are currently 90 -95, though not all are available for scheduling. Drew Brooks noted many operators opted to retire during the pandemic and the recruitment to replace them has been a struggle. Zeisel discussed a national study that analyzed the work force shortage in the transit industry. She stated the study showed that 96% of the 190 transit agencies reported TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 1 1 /1 5 /2023 – MINUTES Page 5 experiencing a work force shortage and 84% reported the shortage is affecting the ability to provide service. The survey also asked agencies and 1,300 current and former transit agency employees to rank the top reasons for leaving or considering leaving and it was found that compensation, work schedule, other working conditions, on the job harassment, and concerns over contracting COVID were the main reasons listed. Zeisel noted Transfort completed a similar survey and the same causes were provided; therefore, a wholistic look at the bus operator position and the implementation of changes that impact these areas of focus has been necessary. Zeisel discussed the four broad categories Transfort has been working on improving, including implementing more consistent schedules for operators, hiring an onboarding and training specialist, providing a new continuing education program, adding an additional transit supervisor position which allowed for a decrease in operator to supervisor ratio, increasing the scope and service levels of contracted security, adding mid-shift breaks for bus operators on long routes, increasing the starting wage from $20 to $22.50 per hour, reclassifying 14 bus operator positions to include benefits and guaranteed hours, implementing a hiring and referral bonus program, and providing free on-site counseling to staff on a bi-weekly basis. Vice Chair Peyronnin asked what percentage of routes and stops are being serviced and noted the current services provided are not adequately serving most people’s needs. He questioned what is being done to increase ridership. Zeisel replied the goal is to bring back all service and as operators are being added, service levels are increasing. She noted that even operating with 108 operators, service is at a bare bones level with difficult schedules for operators. She stated in order to not exacerbate turnover with operators resigning because of those difficult schedules, it has been determined that additional operators will be needed to meet full-service levels in order to make the bus operator position more resilient. Brooks noted free taxi service has been provided in areas where routes have been suspended, though it is not as frequent and user friendly as bus service. Vice Chair Peyronnin asked how that taxi service is advertised and how it is advertised that riding Transfort is free. Burtis noted several routes have very low ridership and asked if the correct routes are being prioritized as service is returning. He also asked if hiring CSU students for campus routes or running cheaper, smaller buses with non-CDL drivers on lower ridership routes. Zeisel replied building out the Transit Master Plan by 2040, as is called for, will take $14.7 million. She noted the recently passed sales tax will provide some additional revenue, but only in the area of about $5 million. She stated internal conversations have been held about the most optimal way to deliver service to the community and how to prioritize Master Transit Plan projects given the known resources, including budget, operator numbers, assets, and facilities . She stated TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 1 1 /1 5 /2023 – MINUTES Page 6 students driving buses has been considered and she agreed creative solutions will be necessary. Burtis stated it seems some outreach and education about bus service would be helpful given that it seems to have fallen off the radar for most people. Zeisel replied it is sometimes difficult to market the service when frequency is lacking and the more service returns, the easier marketing will be. She stated free fares have recently been advertised around town on signs and discussions have been held about expanding Transfort’s social media presence. Zeisel outlined the number of newly hired employees versus lost employees by year noting 40% of the bus operator workforce turned over in 2022; however, in 2023, efforts to improve the position are resulting in decreased separation numbers. She stated the plan is to refine the bus operator pay plan to be more competitive with other driver jobs. She noted bringing back full service without additional drivers will strain bus operators’ schedules in a way that contributes to retention issues. Zeisel discussed some future Transfort initiatives, including the West Elizabeth bus rapid transit project which will include a grant-funded roundabout and transit station at the west end of the line at Overland Trail. She noted the grant-funded 30% design concluded in 2022 and another grant was received for the 100% design. She stated the hope is for construction to begin in 2025 or 2026 with service starting in 2027 of 2028. Zeisel discussed the North College MAX extension which will provide consistent 15-minute frequency on North College. Zeisel stated micro-transit is a recommendation in the Transit Master Plan and the FC Moves team recently received a grant to begin a micro-transit study for areas that are not served by fixed route service. Micro-transit would use shuttles or vans for on- demand service. Zeisel stated Transfort has a goal of 100% zero-emission vehicles by 2040 and is continuing to explore the possibility of autonomous vehicles. Rachline asked if the micro-transit study or service will be occurring at the beginning of the year. Zeisel replied the grant received is for the study. Hart stated routes and frequency that were previously relied upon must be returned in order for him to return as a rider. He outlined the issues with his commute from the south side of town to campus noting it unreliably takes over an hour on the bus. He asked if a north-south route is planned for Timberline between Harmony and Prospect per graphic in the presentation. Brooks replied the graphic is from the Transit Master Plan and it reflects full build-out of the Plan. Hart commended the plans that have been discussed and appreciated the prioritization of drivers. He commented on the importance of first addressing reliability then frequency. TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 1 1 /1 5 /2023 – MINUTES Page 7 b. Parking Study – Eric Keselburg, Drew Brooks Eric Keselburg, Parking Services Manager, stated Council was asked at its October 24th work session whether it supported Parking Services efforts toward development of a new financial and strategic model and its implementation plan. He commented on the current downtown parking pricing structure which disincentivizes parking in preferred long-term locations as the more convenient on-street parking spaces are free whereas the less convenient parking structure options have associated fees. This issue also leads to increased traffic congestion and air pollution as people tend to circle around to find on-street parking. Keselburg stated Fort Collins is about 57 square miles in size and Parking Services only proactively manages about six square miles of the entire parking system; therefore, the rest of the city is reactively patrolled by Fort Collins Police Services Community Service Officers, though that is not their main focus. He stated Parking Services manages about 4,800 parking stalls, 3,100 of which are on -street and free, though time restricted, and 1,700 of which are in parking structures or surface lots. Keselburg discussed fines for parking violations and outlined on-street parking occupancy trends. He noted occupancy of over 80% is deemed unhealthy as it leads to a perception of unavailable parking, and the downtown area reaches those numbers in several block faces frequently. Keselburg discussed the Downtown Development Authority’s 2023 parking and travel habits survey which found the overall vehicle use to get downtown increased from 76% in 2013 to 86% in 2023. Additionally, 51% of respondents in 2013 wanted to spend two hours or less in the downtown area and only 19% of respondents in 2023 felt the same. It was also found that the number of respondents who circle the block looking for an ideal space remained about the same between 2013 and 2023. Keselburg discussed the maintenance funding requirements for the parking structures and noted the reserves for the Civic Center parking structure will essentially be depleted after needed repairs. He discussed the Parking Services revenue sources which include citation issuance, hourly parking rates, and permit sales. He stated revenues dropped about 95-97% for several months during the pandemic which led to the need to subsidize revenue with general fund dollars at a rate that is not sustainable. Keselburg discussed the advisory committee that was formed to look at a parking system fit for the future. He outlined the three possible future methodologies, including curb management, the use of management tools to address peak demand crunches, and support for broader community goals such as Our Climate Future. He stated some of the Parking Study objectives were to update the framework for managing downtown parking, create some metrics that show when and how to expand and refine the menu of options for all different parking users, understand TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 1 1 /1 5 /2023 – MINUTES Page 8 what resources are needed now and, in the future, and to share and build consensus with decision-makers. He noted a successful parking system will support a vibrant, thriving downtown economy, will be welcoming and easily understandable for everyone, including first-time users, will provide multiple options for every user type, will leverage assets to incentivize longer-term parking to move off street into the parking structures, will rely on customer choice versus penalization, and will match industry standards for an effective parking management system in the downtown area. Keselburg outlined the Parking Study’s guidance and objectives which would include a different governance model where stakeholders and vested partners provide input on pricing. He stated additional research is planned for 2024 that will result in options for Council in the late summer or early fall. Vice Chair Peyronnin asked if there is any support for possibly placing parking outside of the downtown area and relying on things like the MAX to bring people downtown thereby encouraging people to walk around the area rather than drive to it. Brooks replied that is a piece of the TDM plan being worked on by the FC Moves team. He noted there is ample parking already existing along the MAX line though frequencies and evening service will need to be restored before full advantage can be taken of that parking. Burtis stated the uptick in the number of vehicles driving to downtown is likely partially caused by the lack of bus service, but he stated it seems as though bike share is also decreasing and that could be helped by increasing permeability as it is difficult to cross downtown on a bike. Additionally, he stated there are problems with people parking in bike lanes, particularly on the west side of town, and increased enforcement would be helpful. Rachline noted much larger cities have worked to keep vehicles out of downtown areas and suggested people’s mindsets could be changed if shown alternatives to driving single-occupancy vehicles. 8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS Chair Brown reported on observing people driving into oncoming traffic to access the left turn lane on Prospect Road. Vice Chair Peyronnin commented on the great deal of construction around the city. He reported on the recent Planning and Zoning Commission work session during which the East Mulberry Corridor Plan, Willox Farm development, Cherry Street mixed-use project, and the Polestar development on West Elizabeth were discussed. He noted there will be a bike trail coming from Polestar that will connect to the planned West Elizabeth MAX roundabout. Additionally, he stated the Commission is working on establishing a q uiet zone and during his presentation to the Commission, mentioned the discussion the Transportation Board had about roundabouts and how they should be the default for new developments. TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 1 1 /1 5 /2023 – MINUTES Page 9 Burtis reported on using transit on a recent visit to Washington, D.C. He stated there are still cars in the bike lane along City Park Avenue and stated better enforcement needs to occur. Hart reported on seeing water leaking in the underpass on College that goes to Redtail Grove and suggested the concrete may need to be examined. He also commented on the number of people parking in bike lanes. He stated he has reported those on Access Fort Collins and encouraged others to do the same. He suggested the City should look at adding bike lanes to the intersection of Stuart and Lemay or improving the awkward section of Spring Creek Trail in that area. He stated he has observed how much less stressful it is to not ride on streets but instead on trails. Drydahl reported on icy conditions on the Spring Creek Trail near the Rolland Moore tennis courts following the recent snow. She also reported on friend being left stranded after a CSU football game due to the lack of MAX service. She commented on the need for safer crossings across Harmony and on having the Power Trail connect. She requested a future presentation about the future of electric vehicle charging stations in the city. She also asked if there is any type of encouraged method for bikes in bike lanes to move out of the way for emergency vehicles. Hart suggested moving to the sidewalk. Blochowiak also commented on issues with parking in bike lanes and suggested perhaps stripping them or painting them a different color. She also reported on observing a rusty, dull mirror on the Poudre Trail and questioned when and how often they get replaced. 9. OTHER BUSINESS a. Bicycle Advisory Committee Report Iverson provided Gavaldon’s report on the recent Bicycle Advisory Committee meeting during which the Committee heard a presentation on the Mulberry Corridor and discussed the Work Plan for the new Active Modes Advisory Board. He noted the BAC will be dissolving and the Active Modes Advisory Board will begin in the spring. b. City Council 6-Month Calendar Review Iverson reported Council will be considering the East Mulberry Plan and the Master Street Plan updates at it’s next meeting. c. Staff Liaison Report Iverson reported he would follow-up on questions asked during Board Member Reports. He stated he and Chair Brown discussed having the December meeting in- person to allow for dinner to be provided. He stated the meeting would occur at 281 North College and a hybrid option would remain available. TRANSPORTATION BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 1 1 /1 5 /2023 – MINUTES Page 10 10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. by unanimous consent. Headline Copy Goes Here Transportation Board – 12.20.23 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards & Roundabouts Headline Copy Goes HereOverview 1.What are the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards? (LCUASS) 2.Roundabouts •Master Street Plan •LCUASS •Implementation Headline Copy Goes HereOverview of LCUASS Larimer County, City of Loveland, and City of Fort Collins have adopted the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. These Standards apply to the design and construction of new and reconstructed streets within the two cities and within the Growth Management Areas for Fort Collins and Loveland within Larimer County. Headline Copy Goes HereOverview What is LCUASS •Comprehensive urban-level set of street engineering design & construction standards. •Collaborative effort between Larimer County, Loveland, & Fort Collins. •Used within the City limits & growth management areas. •Guides the design & construction of both private developments & public engineering capital projects within public right-of-way. •Also used by other jurisdictions Headline Copy Goes HereApplicability Applicability Area LC GMA Boundary = Orange Fort Collins City Limits = Gray Loveland City Limits = Gray •Most of the document applies consistently to all three entities. •Some sections only apply to one or more of the entities due to differing policies, requirements, interests and/or viewpoints. Headline Copy Goes HereHistory First adopted January 2, 2001 Collaboration: o Larimer County o City of Loveland o Fort Collins APWA Colorado Chapter Public Works Program Award in 2002 Updates & Revisions Substantial -“Policy” •10/2/2001 •8/2/2002 •4/1/2007 •8/01/2021 Minor -“Technical” •3/1/2013 •9/1/2014 •9/19/2016 Headline Copy Goes HereTypes of Revisions Policy Revisions Include: •Increase costs •Affect public use & Convenience •Impact to Development Community Technical Revisions Include: •Minor additions & corrections •Consistent with existing policies & law •Resulting in minimal cost impacts •Necessary to conform to engineering construction standards & practices Headline Copy Goes HereRevision Adoption Process Policy Revisions •Requires Public Hearing by all jurisdictions •Staff shall make recommendations to the Local Entity Governing Body •Local Entity Governing Body adopts by an ordinance or resolution. Technical Revisions •Loveland & Fort Collins - No Public Hearing •Larimer County - Any revision ( policy or technical) can only become effective after approval by BCC, following recommendation by County Staff. Headline Copy Goes HereWhat is in LCUASS General Information Design Headline Copy Goes HereWhat is in LCUASS Construction Appendices Headline Copy Goes HereWhat is in LCUASS Cross-section Example Standards Example Headline Copy Goes HereWhat is in LCUASS Policy Example Construction/Design Detail Example Headline Copy Goes HereRoundabouts in Fort Collins Headline Copy Goes HereRoundabouts in Fort Collins Headline Copy Goes HereRoundabouts in Fort Collins Master Street Plan Headline Copy Goes Here Next Steps •Audit of LCUASS and other City standards and codes •Compare to Active Modes Plan, Vision Zero, Climate Action plan and other policy documents •Develop updates