HomeMy WebLinkAboutBicycle Advisory Committee - Minutes - 11/26/2018
BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
TYPE OF MEETING –REGULAR
November 26, 2018, 6:00 p.m.
Community Room, 215 North Mason Street, Fort Collins, CO
1 1 /26/2018 – MINUTES Page
1
FOR REFERENCE:
Chair: Luke Caldwell
Vice-Chair: Aaron Buckley
Staff Liaison: Tessa Greegor 970-416-2471
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Caldwell called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
2. ROLL CALL
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: CITY STAFF PRESENT:
Luke Caldwell, Chair, Natural Resources
Advisory Board
Aaron Buckley, Vice Chair, Fort Collins Bike
Co-op
Karl Ayers, Transportation Board
Bruce Henderson, Bike Fort Collins
Mark Houdashelt, Air Quality Advisory Board
Todd Dangerfield, Downtown Development
Authority
Chris Hunt, Poudre School District
Kelly Smith, Parks and Recreation Board
Mar cia Patton-Mallory, Land Conservation
and Stewardship Board
Annie Krieg, At Large Member
ABSENT:
Alan Beatty, Senior Advisory Board
Sylvia Cranmer, Colorado State University
Terri Marty, At Large Member
Caleb Feaver
Tessa Greegor
Paul Sizemore
PUBLIC PRESENT:
Kevin Borchert
3. AGENDA REVIEW
Chair Caldwell reviewed the agenda.
BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
1 1 /26/2018 – MINUTES Page 2
4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Kevin Borchert stated he is interested in hearing the Power Trail grade separated
crossing discussion.
5. APPROV AL OF MINUTES
Hunt made a motion, seconded by Patton-Mallory, to approve the minutes of the
October 2018 meeting as presented. The motion was adopted unanimously with
Dangerfield and Buckley abstaining.
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Power Trail Grade Separated Crossing at Harmony – Caleb Feaver
Caleb Feaver, Engineering Department, stated the Engineering Department and
City did a prioritization study for grade separated crossings and the Power Trail at
Harmony crossing was recognized as the first priority. He discussed the location
of the site and stated the current at-grade crossing is a detour and is quite
dangerous.
Feaver discussed the feasibility study and alternatives analysis approach,
including the specific criteria used. He noted safety, maintenance, aesthetics and
accessibility will be considered. The consultant has identified three underpass
and two overpass alternatives.
Regarding funding, Feaver stated the project currently has $1.1 million from the
CCIP tax, an $800,000 federal transportation alternatives grant, $400,000 in
design from the budget, and potentially up to $2 million from the CCIP tax in
coming years.
Angie Milewski, Consultant with BHA Design, discussed the five preliminary
alternatives and their effect on utilities and the railroad among other
considerations.
Committee members discussed the impacts of each design on trees and view
corridors. Ayers suggested making interim improvements to the Harmony and
McMurray intersection as the cost of this project will likely push it out to 10 to 15
years from now.
Feaver stated staff hopes to present a preferred alternative to Council early in
2019 and there is a plan to create a committee to examine the alternatives. He
stated a member of the BAC would be welcome on that committee.
11208
BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
1 1 /26/2018 – MINUTES Page 3
b. Magnolia and Shields Bike/Ped Crossing Options – Tessa Greegor
Greegor stated this item has been part of the outreach for the West Mulberry corridor
project and is seen as part of those improvements. She stated the preferred design,
the toucan crossing, was presented at the neighborhood meeting and some
concerns over turning movement restrictions and need for the crossing were
expressed. Therefore, a second alternative has been developed and a new
neighborhood meeting will occur December 10th. Greegor stated the planned
construction is for spring of 2019.
Greegor discussed the toucan design which includes a center waiting island and
exclusive crossing for bicyclists. The pedestrian crossing would be on the north side
of the intersection.
The new design would use the same type of light controlling traffic on Shields and
there would only be a stop sign on Magnolia. There would be no center waiting
island and bikes would stay in their lane of travel and use the pedestrian signal for
crossing. This alternative would allow all turning movements for vehicles.
Committee members discussed possible negative aspects of this design including
conflicts between left-hand turning vehicles and cyclists as well as cyclists or runners
going the wrong direction on the sidewalk.
Patton-Mallory stated bikeways should prioritize cyclist safety and signals should
give preference to bicycles in order to perhaps encourage motorists to take an
alternate route.
Dangerfield asked if complaints were received regarding the loss of parking spaces
with the toucan crossing. Greegor replied the end design resulted in a loss of
approximately two spaces total, which was a reduction from initial designs in
response to neighborhood feedback. Cranmer noted the impacted homes do not
have alley access and their only parking is in front of their homes.
Patton-Mallory asked how the toucan crossing at Pitkin and Lemay has been
received. Greegor replied there were some residents with concerns originally;
however, they have not received negative comments regarding those concerns since
the project was completed.
Ayers asked about the cost of the toucan system versus the lights in option 2, and
how much extra an at-need light for the east-west traffic would add. Greegor replied
a full signal varies depending on the context but a rough estimate is $250,000. The
toucan option is estimated to cost about $150,000; however, that may be lower.
c. CSU Three-Year Work Plan – Aaron Buckley and Erika Benti
Aaron Buckley discussed Transportation Demand Management and stated it
BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
1 1 /26/2018 – MINUTES Page 4
involves taking the demand for more parking and lanes and redirecting that into other
modes and making alternative modes more attractive.
Buckley stated the guiding principles of his work group are to provide safe, equitable,
and efficient access to CSU for students and employees, to create a vibrant campus
that safeguards the pedestrian experience, and to achieve CSU's greenhouse gas
emissions reduction goals.
The Work Plan is divided into 7 sections: engineering, education, enforcement,
equity, environment, encouragement, and evaluation.
Erika Benti discussed an on-line transportation training for incoming students. She
detailed the results of CSU's annual transportation survey of students and
employees. For students, 31% reported the bus as their primary mode of
transportation to campus. For employees, 70% reported driving personal vehicles as
their primary mode. She noted the surveys do occur in February, therefore the
biking numbers may be lower.
Committee members discussed the survey results and effects of various factors
including weather and cost of living.
d. Open Discussion – Aaron Buckley
Buckley stated he would like the Committee to discuss things for which it would like
to advocate and the overall plan for the Committee moving forward in January.
Chair Caldwell mentioned the possible need for additional diversity on the
Committee.
Cranmer suggested the possibility of including a spot for a CSU student on the
Committee.
8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
a. TRANSPORTATION BOARD REPORT – Ayers
b. COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS
9. OTHER BUSINESS
Houdashelt stated this will be his final meeting. Chair Caldwell thanked him for his
service.
a. Staff Report
BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
1 1 /26/2018 – MINUTES Page 5
Greegor stated Winter Bike to Work Day is December 12th and reminded the
Committee there are two vacant seats for at-large members.
Sizemore discussed the recent Council meeting involving E-scooters.
10. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:31 PM by unanimous consent.