HomeMy WebLinkAboutTransportation Board - Minutes - 10/19/2022
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
October 19, 2022, 6:00 p.m.
Virtual Meeting Via Zoom
10/19/202 2 – MINUTES Page 1
FOR REFERENCE:
Chair: Indy Hart
Vice Chair:
Council Liaison:
Cari Brown
Emily Francis
Staff Liaison: Aaron Iverson
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Hart called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
2. ROLL CALL
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
Indy Hart, Chair
Cari Brown, Vice Chair
York
Jerry Gavaldon
Rob Owens
Jess Dyrdahl
Nathalie Rachline
Ed Peyronnin
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT:
Stephanie Blochowiak
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
Seth Lorson
PUBLIC PRESENT:
James Burtis
Members introduced themselves to new member Ed Peyronnin and he discussed his work
history and interest in transportation.
3. AGENDA REVIEW
Iverson stated there were no changes to the published agenda.
4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
None.
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
10/19/202 2 – MINUTES Page 2
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – SEPTEMBER 2022
Gavaldon made a motion, seconded by York, to approve the minutes of the September
2022 meeting as amended to clarify a comment by Rachline and to make changes
suggested by York. The motion was adopted unanimously with Peyronnin abstaining.
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. North College MAX Bus Rapid Transit Study – Seth Lorson
Seth Lorson, Transit Planner, stated the main purpose of this project was to create a
plan to extend the MAX line to North College Avenue while also looking at improving
bicycle and pedestrian connections and encouraging transit-oriented development. He
noted the section of road was identified in the 2019 Transit Master Plan as a place for
expansion of the MAX bus rapid transit line. Additionally, creating a plan for North
College Avenue is consistent with several other City strategies and policies, including
Our Climate Future and equity and inclusion goals.
Lorson discussed the three phases of development of the plan and provided information
on the equity and engagement working group which was formed at the beginning of the
process. He outlined the outcomes of the public involvement process and discussed the
recommendations, including having a phased implementation of the plan . He stated the
near-term recommendations include placing the MAX on North College Avenue in
existing travel lanes at 15-minute headways with a turnaround on the Willox roundabout,
creating new bus stops that are coupled at signalized intersections, removing route 81,
retaining route 8 at 30-minute headways, creating an innovation zone of micro-transit in
areas that are not as close to transit corridors, creating protected bike lanes on North
College Avenue, creating a parallel low-stress network, and creating a shared-use path
on the west side of North College Avenue north of Hibdon.
Regarding land use, Lorson stated the Transit Master Plan and this plan identify what
residential densities and related employment would correlate with certain transit
services. He stated there is a recommendation to create a transit-overlay zone to
reduce parking requirements and provide incentives for higher -density and affordable
housing developments. Additionally, Lorson noted the Master Street Plan will be
amended as it currently shows North Mason Street going through the North College
Mobile Home Park.
Gavaldon asked if there is data on the groups visited and surveyed as part of the public
outreach, specifically whether the Tres Colonias community was contacted. Lorson
replied one of the plan appendices lays out the specifics about which groups were
surveyed and Tres Colonias neighborhoods were engaged , per Gavaldon’s earlier
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
10/19/202 2 – MINUTES Page 3
suggestion.
Rachline suggested route 8 headways should be more frequent than 30 minutes given
the services along Blue Spruce. Lorson noted that is recommended to be more frequent
as service builds in the area.
Gavaldon commented on heavy truck traffic along North College Avenue and suggested
including trucks in the graphic to help illustrate the need for a protected bike lane.
Lorson stated the conditions in the area will be examined to help trigger the mid-term
improvements, including higher bike ridership, increased traffic stacking at intersections,
higher population density, or a CDOT project. He stated the mid-term recommendations
for transit include creating a business access transit (BAT) lane, increasing the
frequency of the MAX and route 8 to 15-minute headways, creating a new turnaround at
Terry Lake Road, creating a mobility hub potentially in partnership with the URA at the
former Albertson’s location, and expanding the sidewalk to a 12 -foot wide shared path.
Rachline noted the near-term recommendation already stated 15-minute headways for
the MAX line. Lorson replied the change between the near-term and mid-term
improvements is the formation of the BAT lane. He stated increasing frequency would
result from increased ridership that would justify the investment. Rachline commented
on the need to invest in an attractive level of service to help increase ridership.
Fehr and Peers, commented on the plan includes a threshold related to the area’s
population and employment in addition to the ridership threshold. He also commented
on the current driver shortage as being a challenge.
Rachline asked about micro-transit plans and whether they are considering Easy Mile
type options. Lorson replied staff does not have an exact plan yet; however, on-demand
micro-transit is becoming more popular whether the vehicles are autonomous or not. He
stated the intention is to provide the service for people outside the transit corridors and
currently, monies have been sought to create a pilot and plan for micro-transit service for
all areas identified in the Transit Master Plan.
Gavaldon concurred with Rachline’s comments regarding providing adequate service
prior to expecting increased ridership, particularly noting the population along North
College is not as dense as farther south.
Per an inquiry from Gavaldon, Lorson provided additional details on the parallel low-
stress network and realignment of North Mason Street. He noted much of the parallel
network will happen through redevelopment rather than through capital projects.
York suggested it would make sense to plan for a transit connection for transit moving
between Fort Collins and Wellington as that could be a prime corridor for regional transit.
Lorson noted that route is also identified in the Transit Master Plan as a regional route.
York also commented on the likelihood of the corridor also being utilized by cyclists.
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
10/19/202 2 – MINUTES Page 4
Lorson went on to review long-term strategies of the plan, including increased frequency
to match with the Mason Street MAX line to allow for one-seat rides. He noted the long-
term goals primarily relate to the success of the plan and transit and
residential/employment growth in the area. He went on to discuss the plan adoption
process and timeline.
Chair Hart commended the overall concept, specifically the phased implementation that
is triggered based on certain criteria.
Gavaldon expressed concern about some typos and misrepresentations in the
appendices and commented on the need to keep the MAX system running consistently
across the entire network. Additionally, he expressed concern some of the graphics do
not accurately represent the true movement of vehicles and traffic patterns, particularly
as they do not include semi-trucks. He stated he sees this as a very long-term plan and
offered lukewarm support.
Rachline stated the lack of a one-seat ride does not adequately link North College to the
rest of the community. Additionally, she questioned what type of recommendation the
Board may be making and what it would mean for Council. Lorson replied the adoption
of this plan by Council indicates the City is in support of expanding the MAX to North
College and making the additional improvements included in the plan. That adoption will
also situate the City to be competitive for grant financing. He discussed the analysis
done on interlining the two MAX services. Fehr and Peers noted the analysis showed
the one-seat ride will occur once the area gets to the point where it can generate similar
productivity to the other portions of the MAX corridor. He acknowledged the desire to
see that happen sooner but stated it comes down to cost and available resources.
Rachline stated the one-seat ride is a question of priority and the suggested approach is
not logical.
Chair Hart noted there was some discussion in the chat about the Planning and Zoning
Commission’s review of this plan at a recent work session.
York asked about the planned realignment of North Mason Street noting it shows the
route going through an existing business and potentially the rear of the Lyric. He
suggested including more details in the presentation moving forward so as to decrease
consternation regarding the details of what may be displaced. Lorson concurred and
noted the Master Street Plan is typically implemented with the development and
redevelopment of property rather than with capital projects to construct new roadways.
Owens commended the phased implementation of the plan and expressed concern the
implementation of a one-seat ride immediately without dedicated bus lanes may end up
being a detriment to the Mason Street MAX line.
Lorson commented on the recent Planning and Zoning Commission work session
discussion. He stated the Commission commended the plan and discussed how
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
10/19/202 2 – MINUTES Page 5
development in the area can be encouraged.
Iverson noted the Board has made formal motions captured in the minutes for these
types of action items in the past and has also written letters directly to Council.
Dyrdahl asked if there is any part of the plan that will reimplement route 81 in
conjunction with the rapid transit plan. Lorson replied that was not one of the
recommendations; the recommendation is to increase the frequency of route 8 and the
North College MAX to 15-minute headways.
York noted this item is not going before Council with a formal vote until February and
asked if a motion by the Board is needed now. Lorson requested that action as staff
does not anticipate many changes to the plan between now and then and having a
schedule is valuable for the North College community which has requested the
implementation of this plan.
Gavaldon commented on the Planning and Zoning Commission relying on the views of
the Transportation Board. He stated he would prefer to wait on making a motion, but
stated he would vote in support with severe reservations due to a weak presentation that
needs additional detail and improved graphics.
Chair Hart stated he supports the plan going before Council as written and has no
reservations. He stated he would prefer to see some action start to occur rather than
having additional discussion.
York asked about the normal lifespan of plans and how often they get revised. Lorson
replied a typical subarea plan would be updated every ten to twenty years and this plan
is more of a transportation plan that should be implemented with additional necessary
details that emerge over time.
Rachline commented on the possibility of a motion that could indicate support for moving
forward with the process though she does not necessarily support the plan’s current
design.
Chair Hart made a motion, seconded by York, to approve the direction in which the plan
is moving and that the Board approves of the concept and considerations but would like
to see additional detail and attention given to the points included in these minutes if
desired when taken to Council.
Dyrdahl commended the phased implementation of the plan and supported the general
direction. She noted there will be few changes to the plan and stated there may not be
any new information presented to the Board in January that will change any motion
made today.
Chair Hart withdrew his original motion and proposed smaller sets of motions.
Chair Hart made a motion, seconded by Owens, that the Transportation Board approves
this plan as presented to be presented to Council.
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
10/19/202 2 – MINUTES Page 6
Gavaldon suggested stacking motions is not the proper procedure. Chair Hart
disagreed and stated having dissenting votes is not improper.
The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: York, Peyronnin, Dyrdahl, Brown, Owens
and Hart. Nays: Gavaldon and Rachline.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Chair Hart made a motion, seconded by Rachline, that the implementation of the phased
plan in the short-term, mid-term, and long-term needs reevaluation. Yeas: Peyronnin
and Rachline. Nays: Gavaldon, York, Brown, Owens, Hart and Dyrdahl.
THE MOTION FAILED.
Gavaldon thanked Lorson and Fehr and Peers for their work.
Rachline suggested having Drew Brooks involved in future transit-related conversations.
8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Dyrdahl reported on a recent visit to CSU by the Utah State student government and
their trip with ASCSU students on the MAX to Pueblo Viejo. She noted many of the
CSU students hadn’t previously taken the MAX.
Owens discussed light phasing at Prospect and Shields that leads to left-turn backups.
He also commented on the Transfort bus driver shortage and questioned how marketing
is occurring, noting it does not show up within the first few listings when searched on
Indeed.com (a job listing site).
Peyronnin expressed appreciation for the hard work and deep consideration of issues by
the Board.
Gavaldon reported on the last Planning and Zoning Commission work session during
which the Active Modes Plan, North College MAX, 15-Minute City Analysis, and 1041
regulations were discussed. He also commented on a Coloradoan article about what to
do in the case of an E-bike accident and announced a bike-in movie event at the Museo
de las Tres Colonias.
Vice Chair Brown reported on attending the Poudre School District Leadership Program
and recent visit to the transportation building. She noted PSD is having a bus driver
shortage as well.
Peyronnin reported on work being done by the Campus Bicycle Advisory Committee and
City Bicycle Advisory Committee to address the recent Colorado safety stop law in terms
of education, enforcement, and data collection.
Rachline reported on debris in bike lanes.
York reported on seeing cleaner bike lanes and stated he did recently see a street
sweeper in bike lanes on Laporte Avenue near Poudre High School. He requested a
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
10/19/202 2 – MINUTES Page 7
future report on the I-25 construction and Poudre Trail connection. He noted Winter
Bike to Work Day has been moved to February 10th. He commented on his experience
riding the United Airlines bus from the Fort Collins Loveland Airport to the Denver Airport
and commented on articles he sent to the Board regarding facilitating fewer trips
between Cheyenne and northern Colorado and on making a mode shift to transit a
priority.
Rachline commended the agenda only having one topic which helps the Board stay on
time with its discussions.
Chair Hart reported on seeing some clear bike lanes and some needing attention ,
particularly related to debris from accidents. He noted tow truck drivers are supposed to
be collecting that debris and suggested more outreach may need to be done in that
regard. He also commented on a near accident he had on his bicycle and stated he has
reached a point where he has lost faith in his ability to use Transfort citing delays and a
lack of reliability.
Gavaldon suggested the Board receive a presentation from Drew Brooks regarding the
bus driver shortage.
9. OTHER BUSINESS
a. Bicycle Advisory Committee Report
York reported on the recent BAC meeting during which the North College MAX plan,
Vision Zero Action Plan, and a Safe Streets for All Grant were discussed. Iverson
noted the grant was safety-focused and will go toward intersection improvements that
are aligned with the Active Modes Plan. Additionally, he noted the Vision Zero Plan
is set to be discussed by this Board next month.
b. City Council 6-Month Calendar Review
Iverson reported Council will be discussing the 15-Minute City Analysis and the
Active Modes Plan at its next work session and will soon be discussing the budget,
Active Modes Plan adoption, Vision Zero, sustainable funding sources, and the North
College MAX plan.
c. Staff Liaison Report
None.
Chair Hart commended Gavaldon’s attention to details and data and stated the
debate and discussion only aims to improve transportation in Fort Collins.
10. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. by unanimous consent.