HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/17/2022 - Water Commission - AGENDA - Regular Meeting
WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
November 17, 2022 5:30PM – 7:30PM
Online via Zoom
11/17/2022 Agenda Page 1
This remote Water Commission meeting will be available online via Zoom or by phone. No
one will be allowed to attend in person. The meeting will be available to join beginning at 5:00
p.m. Participants should join at least 15 minutes prior to the 5:30 p.m. start time.
ONLINE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
You will need an internet connection on a laptop, computer, or smartphone, and may join the
meeting through Zoom at https://zoom.us/j/97277170269 Webinar ID: 972 7717 0269 (Using
earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio). Keep yourself on muted status.
For public comments, the Chairperson will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to
indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all
participants have an opportunity to comment.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION BY PHONE:
Please dial +1 346 248 7799 and enter Webinar ID 972 7717 0269. Keep yourself on muted
status.
For public comments, when the Chair asks participants to click the “Raise Hand” button if they
wish to speak, phone participants will need to press *9 to do this. Staff will be moderating the
Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Water Commission.
When you are called, press *6 to unmute yourself.
Documents to Share: Any document or presentation a member of the public wishes to
provide to the Water Commission for its consideration must be emailed to JSong@fcgov.com
at least 24 hours before the meeting.
(Continued on next page)
WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
November 17, 2022, 5:30PM – 7:30PM
Online via Zoom
11/17/2022 Agenda Page 2
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. AGENDA REVIEW
4. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION (3 MINUTES PER INDIVIDUAL)
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: OCTOBER 20
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NONE
(Continued on next page)
Provide Comments via Email: Individuals who are uncomfortable or unable to access the
Zoom platform or participate by phone are encouraged to participate by emailing comments
to JSong@fcgov.com at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. If your comments are specific to
any of the discussion items on the agenda, please indicate that in the subject line of your
email. Staff will ensure your comments are provided to the Water Commission.
Documents to Share: If residents wish to share a document or presentation, Staff Liaison
Jason Graham’s administrative professional needs to receive those materials via the above
email address at least 24 hours before the meeting.
Individuals uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or unable to participate by
phone are encouraged to participate by emailing general public comments you may have to
JSong@fcgov.com. The Interim Staff Liaison’s administrative professional will ensure the
Water Commission receives your comments. If you have specific comments on any of the
discussion items scheduled, please make that clear in the subject line of the email and send
24 hours prior to the meeting.
WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
November 17, 2022, 5:30PM – 7:30PM
Online via Zoom
11/17/2022 Agenda Page 3
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Staff Reports
Financial Monthly Report (meeting packet only)
Water Resources Monthly Report (meeting packet only)
Halligan Water Supply Project Quarterly Report (meeting packet only)
b. Regular Items
1041 Regulations Update
(Discussion and Action: 45 minutes)
Kirk Longstein, Senior Environmental Planner
8. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
(Committees, Event attendance, etc.)
9. OTHER BUSINESS
(Commissioner concerns, Announcements)
a. Discussion of 2023 Work Plan
10. ADJOURNMENT
DRAFT MINUTES WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
October 20, 2022, 5:30-7:30 p.m.
Hybrid in person at 222 LaPorte Ave and online via Zoom
10/20/2022 – DRAFT MINUTES Page 1
1. CALL TO ORDER
5:30 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Jason Tarry (Chairperson), Greg Steed (Vice Chairperson),
John Primsky, Jordan Radin, Rick Kahn, Tyler Eldridge
Commissioners Absent - Excused: Kent Bruxvoort, Paul Herman, Randy Kenyon
Staff Members Present: Jason Graham, Lance Smith, Mariel Miller, John Song,
Shannon Ash, Heather Young, Katie Collins, Michael Neale, Kendall Minor
Members of the Public: none
3. AGENDA REVIEW
Chairperson Jason Tarry briefly summarized items on the agenda
4. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
None
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
CHAIRPERSON TARRY ASKED FOR COMMENTS AND REVISIONS ON THE AUGUST
18 MINUTES.
Commissioner Steed moved to approve the August 18 minutes.
Commissioner Radin seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: it passed unanimously, 6-0
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Staff Reports
(Attachments available upon request)
i. Financial Monthly Report
(meeting packet only)
ii. Water Resources Monthly Report
(meeting packet only)
DRAFT MINUTES WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
10/20/2022 – DRAFT MINUTES Page 2
Discussion Highlights
Northern has set the Colorado Big-Thompson (CBT) quotient for 40% for next
year - Commissioners and staff had never seen it that low before, or at least
in a long time. Mr. Graham said they’re discussing it internally for what that
means for the organization. Perhaps Northern is worried about the
predictions for the Colorado River, but it’s still a big adjustment. Come April,
the City is expecting to see additional quota, and would likely end up at
around 60-70%, but Water Conservation is working with Water Resources to
look at models and scenarios with current projections. A Commissioner
inquired if this would change the way that water will be managed, such as
implementing water restrictions, to which Mr. Graham responded that it
wouldn’t at least until April, and they’re still determining if there are changes
to be made.
iii. Memo: 2022 Summer Water Quality Update – Upper Cache la Poudre
Watershed
(meeting packet only)
Discussion Highlights
Mr. Graham commented that the summer saw good re-establishment of the
burn area of the Upper Cache la Poudre Watershed, and barring any future
fires, restoration is on track. The question remains whether the Colorado-Big
Thompson (CBT) source will adhere to expectations and whether the supply
will meet the community’s demand, but that’s the balance that the Water
Conservation Team is aiming to achieve. A Commissioner commented that
the entire system has been compromised after the fire, noting that the
watershed can now hold less than it was able to previously due to loss of tree
cover.
iv. Director of Water Quarterly Update
Director of Water Utilities Jason Graham gave an update on the ordinance
amending chapter 26 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins, addressing
unexpected challenges to nonresidential redevelopment customers from
Ordinance 119, 2021.
Discussion Highlights
Commissioners asked for clarification on the City’s change in language to the
ordinance and its impact on the circumstances of a review, to which Mariel
Miller, Water Conservation Manager, and Mr. Graham responded that the
review is triggered if there are changes to the water meter or service with a
larger size, or changes to their water infrastructure. Another Commissioner
inquired about time restraints for the review, alluding to disruptions to the
business during its process, but it was unknown at this time, but Mr. Graham
DRAFT MINUTES WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
10/20/2022 – DRAFT MINUTES Page 3
referenced that there were some businesses that have been in limbo for up to
3-4 months. He added that for those infrastructures that were grandfathered
in and were paid for under an old system, it presents an opportunity to review
for water supply requirements to assign accurate allotments. It provides
security for future water use, as it allows to set predictable expectations for
the City and businesses, allowing for foreseeable rubrics for excess water
use. A Commissioner asked what percentage water is used by businesses, to
which Ms. Miller responded that it was about half compared to residential. Mr.
Graham added that this allows for a reset of expectations with businesses,
especially with restaurants in mind. He added that City Council approved this
change.
b. Regular Items
(Attachments available upon request)
i. 2023 Utility Rates and Fees
Financial Planning and Analysis Director Lance Smith presented on the
proposed changes to the 2023 water, stormwater, and wastewater utility
rates and fees, and to seek support to present the changes to Council for
approval.
Discussion Highlights
A Commissioner inquired whether there are statutory requirements, to which
Mr. Smith responded that the City does not as it’s a home rule community,
but it does have financial policies that specify minimum reserve balances in
percentages. Another Commissioner asked when there would be a firmer
understanding for the Halligan cost estimate, to which Mr. Smith answered
he’d have a better understanding in about 6 months. The Commissioner
continued to inquire whether there’s a figure where it no longer seems
prudent to spend money on the project considering inflation, construction
costs, easements, etc. A Commissioner projected that if the project is $150M,
Halligan would provide $19K per acre-foot, while CBT water is going to
$120K per acre-foot, and the Commissioner added that even if the project
cost $300M, it would still be a fraction of CBT water. Mr. Smith added that the
costs wouldn’t be spent front loaded, but over time with cost-effective
solutions during the process. A Commissioner wondered whether the
foundational principle is still in effect that development pays the incremental
cost for itself over time. Mr. Smith responded that it still is, though legally the
requirement is that the development does not exceed the cost of adding a
customer, thus the City is not obligated to have development fully pay for
itself, but it’s the direction that Council wants to continue. The Commissioner
inquired whether these increases keep the City’s reserves at the historically
agreed upon percentage, to which Mr. Smith responded that it does. Another
DRAFT MINUTES WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
10/20/2022 – DRAFT MINUTES Page 4
Commissioner commented that it would be helpful to see models of what it
would look like to decrease rates and fees, just to see what the alternative
would be. Another Commissioner commented that the rate increases don’t
put the community ahead of inflation or other rise in costs, considering
infrastructure renewal, income deficiencies, etc. Mr. Smith responded that the
4% increase is a part of a longer timeline, hoping to see replacement rates
for infrastructure at a sustainable level over the next five years. Another
Commissioner added that the rates are still lower than many of the
communities in Northern Colorado even with the rate increases, such as
Loveland, Longmont, Greeley, and Colorado Springs. Another Commissioner
underlined that it’s critical to inform the public about Utility changes over the
next five years.
Commissioner Kahn moved that the Water Commission recommend City
Council approve the proposed changes to the Utility’s water, wastewater, and
stormwater rates and fees as presented.
Discussion Highlights
Commissioners decided to add a clause in the motion to include a plan for
informing the public.
Commissioner Kahn moved that the Water Commission recommend City
Council approve the proposed changes to the Utility’s water, wastewater, and
stormwater rates and fees as presented, and develop a plan to inform the
public about this year’s increases and increases into the future.
Commissioner Tarry seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion: it passed unanimously, 6-0
ii. Income-Qualified Assistance Program Feedback
Shannon Ash, Affordability Programs Manager, and Heather Young,
Community Engagement Manager, presented on the Income-Qualified
Assistance Program that aims to serve the community with a reduced rate
program and education opportunities for low-income customers and to seek
approval to bring it to Council.
Discussion Highlights
A Commissioner commented that in a past presentation, they had been led to
believe that it would be nearly impossible to reach 2,000 participants, but it
seems to be projected to exceed that number by 2023. The Commissioner
added that the cost to run this program for Utilities is much higher than the
DRAFT MINUTES WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
10/20/2022 – DRAFT MINUTES Page 5
$415,000 figure presented, as it also includes staff effort and salaries. A
Commissioner inquired about the qualifications, to which Ms. Young clarified
that customers were auto-enrolled through the Colorado Low-income Energy
Assistance Program (LEAP), a state-funded program. Ms. Ash clarified for a
Commissioner that unclaimed funds are added to the payment assistance
fund.
Commissioner Steed moved that the Water Commission recommend City
Council approve to support the Income-Qualified Assistance Program
becoming an adopted Utility program.
Commissioner Tarry seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion: it passed, 5-1
Commissioner Primsky opposed the motion as the program may continue to
encourage people to be dependent on government programs and not be
resourceful in other ways. He also opposed as there was no real detailed
application that was specific to the program itself. He would like to add that
there should be a robust review process, as ratepayers should not support
participants who may practice irresponsible spending, especially by looking at
the projected spending for the program.
iii. Allotment Management Program Update and Extension
Water Conservation Specialist Katie Collins presented on the Allotment
Management Program (AMP), which has served commercial customers with
undersized allotments by waiving some or all Excess Water Use (EWU)
surcharges accrued while implementing a project proposed to save water.
Ms. Collins seeks recommendation from the Water Commission for Council
to extend the program by three years.
Discussion Highlights
A Commissioner expressed surprise that such large developments didn’t
consider the cost of maintenance in accordance with their allotments.
Another Commissioner answered that for permitting, the quickest way to
check the box is to throw down Kentucky bluegrass sod—a cheap option—in
order to be permitted, leading to these issues later that exceed allotments.
Another Commissioner inquired if the staff had considered simply raising the
rate if a development exceeds the allotment exorbitantly in order to
discourage spending. Ms. Miller responded that the program also hopes to
reduce demands for the overall water supply, as well as those who
DRAFT MINUTES WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
10/20/2022 – DRAFT MINUTES Page 6
purchased land and didn’t make the initial decision to put down Kentucky
bluegrass at the time of development. Another Commissioner desired to see
developers incentivized not to put property owners in situations that exceed
allotments moving forward. Another Commissioner wondered whether
extending it another 3 years makes sense, but Ms. Collins commented that
development code only just changed this year, and there are still properties
that are dealing with this issue. Mr. Graham added that the program is
achieving its goals of reducing overall water usage and saving costs. Another
Commissioner inquired whether the program would add participants,
especially through the meter change ordinance for properties that are
overusing water. Ms. Collins responded that eligibility specifically requires
that the estimated landscape water need must exceed an allotment. Some
Commissioners commented that this may enable those who had made short-
sighted decisions at the time of development, while others expressed that it
may act as a reset for property owners that have found themselves with this
issue.
Commissioner Tarry moved that the Water Commission recommend City
Council approve an ordinance to extend the Allotment Management Program
by three years.
Discussion Highlight
Commissioners decided that they wanted to change the number of years of
the extension to one year, though that would still allow participants up to
three years of waivers.
Commissioner Tarry moved that the Water Commission recommend City
Council approve an ordinance to extend the Allotment Management Program
by one year.
Commissioner Kahn seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion: it passed unanimously, 6-0.
7. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
None
8. OTHER BUSINESS
Memo to Council Regarding BFO Offer 4.47
DRAFT MINUTES WATER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
10/20/2022 – DRAFT MINUTES Page 7
Commissioner Radin moved to approve the memo to be sent to Council as written.
Commissioner Kahn seconded the motion.
9. ADJOURNMENT
8:11 p.m.
These minutes will be approved by the Water Commission on November 17, 2022.
WaterRevenuein thousandsPercent of Year 83.3%OctoberYear to DateActualOver/ (Under)BudgetActualOver/ (Under) Inc/(Dec)% Bud Recvd % Act Recvd2022 2022 Bud 2022 2022 2022 Bud 2021 2022 2021Residential Water Sales$ 1,642 * $ 4 $ 14,544 $ 15,224 $ 680(A)$ (58) 91%86%Com/Indl Water Sales1,167 * 51 8,139 8,806667(B)311 94%90%Raw Water Surcharge647 * 405306 1,236930(C)529 247%126%District Water Sales280 * 66 1,593 1,964371(D)(292) 103%72%Other Water Sales6 * 3909526 (383)(E)(74) 57%73%PILOTs1857 1,471 1,5629216 92%87%Operating Revenue3,928 536 26,962 29,319 2,357432 94%87%Interest Revenue10668508719210229 121%126%Development Fees/PIFs/Contributions82 (55) 1,299772 (526)(F)(1,001) 50%15%Financing Sources000332 2%2%Other Misc14(5)1521608(183) 63%33%Total Lapsing Revenue**4,129 544 28,921 30,972 2,052(521) 92%77%Non-lapsing Revenue000TOTAL**$ 4,129$ 30,972$ (521)Variance Analysis:(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F)***Raw Water Surcharges are 304% over budget and 75% more than YTD 2021.Residential Water Sales are 4.7% over budget and 0.4% less than YTD 2021.Note: No Water rate increase for 2022.Commercial/Industrial Water sales are 8.2% over budget and 3.7% more than YTD 2021.October billed revenue is for September and early October.Excludes transfers and unrealized gain/loss on value.Plant Investment Fees ($444), Water Rights ($84).District Water sales are 23.3% over budget and 12.9% less than YTD 2021.Irrigation Sales ($408) (water supply didn't yield as much due to fire impacts, so rented out less water, under budget ~$500 by YE) offset by Standpipe Sales $25.2
Water Fund2022 Department ExpenseIn thousands`Percent of Year 83.3%Excludes depreciation and transfersOctoberYear to DateActual(Over)/ UnderYTD Bdgt Actual(Over)/ Under (Inc)/DecActual + PO'sSpent & Committed2022 2022 Bud 2022 2022 2022 Bud 2021 2022 by PO'sWater Treatment$ 428 $ 27 $ 7,722 $ 5,140 $ 2,582(A)$ (322) $ 8,37987%Water Resources983(768)3,1132,456657(B)128 $ 2,66675%Water Quality Lab142(27)931934(3)(69) $ 96582%Subtotal WR&T$ 1,553 $ (768)$ 11,766 $ 8,531 $ 3,236 $ (263) $ 12,01184%Transmission & Distribution357(72)2,5252,50025(106) $ 2,52878%Water Meters O&M99(10)68260280(31) $ 61668%Engineering4020972506466(C)(145) $ 71462%Subtotal WEFS 496 (62) 4,180 3,608 571 (282) $ 3,859 73%Water Conservation83 47 1,134 749 386 (110) $ 1,061 74%PILOTs186 (7) 1,471 1,562 (92) (16) $ 1,562 92%Admin Services - CS&A364 0 3,645 3,645 0 (100) $ 3,645 83%Other Payments & Transfers129 26 1,692 1,777 (85)(D)(523) $ 2,03570%Subtotal Operating Expenses$ 2,811 $ (764)$ 23,888 $ 19,8730$ 4,016 $ (1,295) $ 24,17380%Debt Service000000$ 00%Minor Capital51221,438863575(E)(204) $ 1,62974%Total Lapsing$ 2,816$ (642)$ 25,327$ 20,736$ 4,591$ (1,498)$ 25,80279%Non-lapsing Expenses6854,2251,597TOTAL$ 3,501$ 24,961$ 98Variance Analysis:(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)Consulting Services $254 (project delays due to vacancies (e.g. modeling effort), some underway; underspend by YE, and some will be carried forward via PO carryforward), Personnel $229 (vacancies), Water Assessment Services $70 ($26 of budget for Rigden distributed in Feb, while invoicing happens after YE, will book in Dec), Other Professional & Technical $42 (primarily for NISP outreach BFO offer #1.63 - on hold due to delay in Record of Decision for NISP), and Maintenance Contracts $40.Legal Services ($94) (related to OASIS/Open International lawsuit, over budget by YE).Contract Payment to Gov't/Other $2,103 (PO carryforward for payments to Greeley: Cameron Peak Fire - Watershed; specifics and funding sources being worked out (to maximize cost matching and have the most impact); some carrying forward, some underspend by YE (year-end)), Consulting $78, Project Management Services $43 (estimated Fort Collins' portion of PM to manage post-fire recovery efforts - is used as needed; potentially some underspend by YE, will carry forward), Electricity $50 (weren't running all four treatment trains earlier this year, due to lower demand), Construction Services $82 ($20 underspend from PO carryforward related to the Poudre intake and channel realignment, under ~$20+ by YE), Personnel $59, Chemicals $40, Maintenance Contracts $37, Other Professional & Technical $26, Testing Services $23 (Big Thompson Watershed Forum dissolved and trying to reforming an entity to provide those services; potential underspend by YE), Lab Supplies $13, Paint Supplies $14, Machinery & Equipment Parts $12, Water Assessment Services $12, Conference & Travel $11, Clothing Supplies $10, and Contractual Labor $10, offset by Electrical Parts ($26) (unexpected switchgear issue), and Natural Gas ($26) (likely due to colder than expected weather this past winter, over budget by YE), and Other Supplies ($23).Consulting Services $272 (primarily Large Valve Maintenance work - all but $73 encumbered, likely to spend 1/2 of encumbrance this year and will carry forward 1/2 into next year; under budget by YE), Personnel $146 (vacancies and potentially more time being charged capital than budgeted in allocations out), and Other Professional & Technical $19 (used as needed, likely underspend by YE).Consulting $214, Construction Contracts $156, Other Capital Outlay $66, Other Equipment $62, Mechanical & Heavy Equipment $66, Security Equipment $43, Building Maintenance Services $23, Water Filter Material $20, and Motor Vehicles $14, offset by Construction Services ($72), Computer Hardware- Capital ($24) (budget distributed 1/12 for Water Meter Test Bench, flat by YE), Building Improvements ($31), Machinery & Equipment Parts ($17).3
WastewaterRevenuein thousandsPercent of Year 83.3%OctoberYear to DateActualOver/ (Under)BudgetActualOver/ (Under) Inc/(Dec)% Bud Recvd % Act Recvd2022 2022 Bud 2022 2022 2022 Bud 2021 2022 2021Residential WW Sales$ 1,324 * $ 11 $ 13,134 $ 13,237 $ 103(A)$ (85) 84%83%Com/Indl WW Sales595 * (10) 5,263 5,073 (191)(B)384 82%91%District WW Sales33 * (3)354341(13)(2) 80%83%Other WW Sales36 * 24160263103(C)34 132%94%PILOTs117(1) 1,131 1,120(12)18 83%85%Operating Revenue2,10620 20,042 20,033(9)349 84%85%Interest Revenue5534282382101124 118%131%Development Fees/PIFs/Contributions26 (130)445420(25)(D)(467) 56%28%Financing Sources00044(21)Other Misc3 (13)9112534(E)28 100%83%Total Lapsing Revenue**2,189 (88) 20,860 20,96510514 83%82%Non-lapsing Revenue000TOTAL**$ 2,189$ 20,965$ 14Variance Analysis:Note: No Wastewater rate increase for 2022.(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)Lab Services $16, and Bad Debt Recovery $20.***Residential sales are 0.8% over budget and 0.6% less than YTD 2021.Septage Treatment Charge $102.Commercial/Industrial sales are 3.6% under budget and 8.2% more than YTD 2021. due to decreased water consumption for some of the larger customers driven by weather variations and Excludes transfers and unrealized gain/loss on value.Plant Investment Fees ($30).October billed revenue is for September and early October.4
Wastewater Fund2022 Department ExpenseIn thousandsPercent of Year 83.3%Excludes depreciation and transfersOctoberYear to DateActual(Over)/ UnderYTD Bdgt Actual(Over)/ Under YTD (Inc)/DecActual + PO's% Bud Spent & Committed2022 2022 Bud 2022 2022 2022 Bud 2021 2022 by PO'sWater Reclamation & Biosolids $ 467 $ 58 $ 4,951 $ 4,702 $ 249(A)$ (206) $ 4,86077%Pollution Control Lab109(2)97392845(25)96878%Subtotal WR&T576555,923 5,630294(231)5,82977%Trunk & Collection12581,404 1,37133(170)1,37177%Engineering4510816575240(B)(224)68170%Subtotal WEFS170192,220 1,947273(394)2,05275%PILOTs11711,131 1,11912(18)1,11983%Admin Services - CS&A214(0)2,140 2,140(0)(27)2,14083%Other Payments & Transfers10311,178 1,276(98)(C)(268)1,32560%Subtotal Operating Expenses$ 1,180 $ 75$ 12,592 $ 12,111$ 480 $ (938) $ 12,46576%Debt Service002592590$ 3325912%Minor Capital263731752(21)(D)$ (210)1,18092%Total Lapsing$ 1,182 $ 138$ 13,581 $ 13,122$ 459 $ (1,116) $ 13,90546%Non-lapsing Expenses4043,964(1,094)TOTAL$ 1,586$ 17,086$ (2,210)Variance Analysis:(A)(B)(C)(D)Consulting $107 (vacancy and waiting on purchasing strategy; likely underspend by YE), Personnel $100 (vacancies), Conference & Travel $23 (vacancies and coverage as well as savings due to virtual rather than in person), Machinery & Equipment Parts $54 (vacancies and supply chain delays causing delays in some replacements), Contractual Labor $20 (used as needed and haven't had staff to manage), Water $18, Chemicals $18 (use depends on treatment levels and processes; some things weren't budgeted adequately (e.g. carbon); over budget by YE), Land Maintenance Services $10 (shortage of contractors), Communication Supplies $14 (might be some requisitions coming - some spent out of minor cap), offset by Electricity ($82) (budget kept flat since 2019 despite annual rate increases, and don't have what we need to meet process needs and be energy efficient with blowers at MWRF; over budget by YE), Natural Gas ($26) (budget reduced expecting savings due to digestor pumps, heat exchanger, and cogen - latter two are not online; cogen not complete due to parts and staff resources; over budget by YE), Motor Fuel, Oil & Grease ($12), and Lab Supplies ($11).Consulting $150 and Construction Services $19 (primarily DWRF Utility Mapping - $172 encumbered; will spend some this year and carry some forward), and Personnel $29 (vacancies, offset by a PM position that was repurposed to WRB Engineer working on replacement and minor capital projects, but HBU not moved thus allocation out applied at status quo, will persist into '23-'24), and Other Professional & Technical $18 (used as needed, likely underspend by YE).Legal Services ($101) (related to OASIS/Open International lawsuit, over budget by YE).Trunk & Collection ($347) (budget for dump truck purchase from PO carryforward distributed in Dec, will correct then, except for ~$8 due to purchasing a larger excavator than usual for safety reasons, over $8 by YE), Water Reclamation & Biosolids $290 (Vehicles/Equipment $276, Building Improvements $61, offset by Other Capital Outlay ($47)). 5
StormwaterRevenuein thousandsPercent of Year 83.3%OctoberYear to DateActualOver/ (Under)BudgetActualOver/ (Under) Inc/(Dec)% Bud Recvd % Act Recvd2022 2022 Bud 2022 2022 2022 Bud 2021 2022 2021Single Family Residential SW Services$ 681 * $ (3) $ 6,819 $ 6,802 $ (17)(A)$ 62 83%84%Non-single Family SW Services835 * (7) 8,401 8,329(72)(B)89 82%84%Operating Revenue1,517 (10) 15,220 15,131(89)150 83%84%Interest Revenue3927157266109104 146%140%Development Fees/PIFs/Contributions49(9)454597143(C)(527) 105%42%Financing Sources0001010(17)Other Misc22 03636(D)6107%Total Lapsing Revenue**1,60710 15,832 16,041209(284) 84%81%Non-lapsing Revenue000TOTAL**$ 1,607$ 16,041$ (284)Variance Analysis:Note: No Stormwater rate increase for 2022.(A)(B)(C)(D)***Stormwater Development Fee $61, Erosion Control Development Inspection $45, Development Review Charges $24, and Infrastructure Development Inspection $13.Non-Single Family fees are 0.9% under budget and 1.1% greater than 2021.Single Family Residential fees are 0.2% under budget and 0.9% greater than 2021.Excludes transfers and unrealized gain/loss on value.October billed revenue is for September and early October.Floodplain Permits $17, Bad Debt Recovery $7, Other Misc $6, and Insurance Recovery $4.6
Stormwater Fund2022 Department ExpenseIn thousandsPercent of Year 83.3%Excludes depreciation and transfersOctoberYear to DateActual(Over)/ UnderBudget Actual(Over)/ Under (Inc)/Dec Actual + PO's% Bud Spent & Committed2022 2022 Bud 2022 2022 2022 Bud 2021 2022 by PO'sDrainage and Detention$ 155 $ 39 $ 1,743 $ 1,774 $ (31)(A)$ (224)$ 1,89687%Engineering11917 1,706 1,120586(B)(48)1,30262%Stormwater Quality Programs257 531319213(20)44972%Admin Services - CS&A255(0) 2,548 2,548(0)(22)2,54883%Other Payments & Transfers663 725802(77)(C)(197)85141%Subtotal Operating Expenses $ 620 $ 66 $ 7,253 $ 6,562$ 691 $ (511)$ 7,04770%Debt Service0011110412111%Minor Capital0157 1,150770380(D)(656)1,20398%Total Lapsing$ 620 $ 223 $ 8,415 $ 7,343 $ 1,071 $ (755)$ 8,26168%Non-lapsing Expenses5012,849812TOTAL$ 1,121$ 10,192$ 57Variance Analysis:(A)(B)(C)(D)Mowing Services $55 (BFO offer 4.14, expecting to be $34 under budget by year-end (YE)), Personnel $36 (vacancies and turnover), Vehicle Repair $49 (reactionary - newer equipment holding up well, under budget by ~$50 by YE), Consulting $54 (BFO Offer 1.65 Dirt Recycling & Management Study expected to be unspent, under budget by $75 by YE), offset by Street & Bridge Maintenance ($54) (reactionary to necessary repairs and ~$60 for CMO directive for Glenmoor pond work, over budget ~$50 by YE), Land Maintenance Services ($41) (reactionary to necessary needs, over budget ~$50 by YE), Leased Equipment Rental Services ($48) (reactionary to necessary repairs, over budget ~$50 by YE), Health & Safety Supplies ($32) (were told to buy AED and OSHA 10 Hour, confined space equipment within existing budgets, over budget ~$30+ by YE), and Sewer Pipe & Accessories ($25) (reactionary to necessary repairs, over budget ~$50 by YE).Consulting $260 (primarily BFO offer 4.16 Poudre River Flow Consolidation Study, expecting to complete and use most of the budget by YE, Personnel $260 (primarily vacancies, under budget by YE), Other Professional & Technical $21 (used as needed, likely underspend by YE), and Conference & Travel $12 (due to vacancies, underspend by YE).Vehicles/Equipment (all but $24K of 2022 budget encumbered - awaiting delivery of 2 vehicles).Legal Services ($101) (related to OASIS/Open International lawsuit, over budget by YE).7
Utilities
electric · stormwater · wastewater · water
700 Wood Street
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.212.2900
V/TDD: 711
utilities@fcgov.com
fcgov.com/utilities
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 8, 2022
TO: Water Commission
FROM: Michael Neale, MSc, Water Resources Engineer
RE: October 2022 Water Resources Division Staff Report
Purpose
This memorandum is intended to update the Water Commission on water resource conditions for
the City of Fort Collins Water Utility (Water Utility) over the month of October and provide
updated outlook information. For additional information, please refer to the City’s website:
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/water-status
Water Resources Summary
Supply and Demand Projections for the remainder of WY2022
• Water Supply – During the month of October, water supply consisted of 59% from
Horsetooth Reservoir, and 41% from the Poudre River.
• Water Demand – Demands within the Water Utility service area for the month of October
were slightly above projected. Please refer to the graphs and tables below.
• Water demand for October was 103% of the projected demand.
• Water demand for calendar year is 97% of the projected demand.
Weather: https://climate.colostate.edu/
Measured at the Fort Collins weather station 053005 along with average normals from 1991-2020:
• Mean daily high temperature recorded for the month: 68.0 oF.
• 30-year average daily high temperature for the month is: 50.2 oF.
• Total recorded monthly precipitation: 0.33 inches.
• 30-year average precipitation for the month: 1.25 inches.
Reservoir Storage: As of November 1st, and presented in the Northern District Storage and
Delivery Report:
• Colorado-Big Thompson project reservoirs (Granby, Carter, and Horsetooth): 77% full.
• Horsetooth Reservoir: 51% full.
• Joe Wright Reservoir: 66% full (102% of average for the month based on 14 years of data).
Cache la Poudre River flow: Graphical data for the Poudre River is available on-line at:
• Cache La Poudre River at the Canyon Mouth
https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/CLAFTCCO?params=DISCHRG
• Cache La Poudre River at Fort Collins
https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/CLAFORCO?params=DISCHRG
Drought Monitors:
• Larimer County and Colorado https://climate.colostate.edu/drought_info.html
As of November 1st, Larimer County is experiencing abnormally dry conditions.
• Colorado and the USA https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/
The Colorado River basin remains in severe drought conditions.
Climate Outlook: https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) climate outlooks for the northern Front
Range and northern mountains, over the next three months:
• Equal chances of above or below normal precipitation.
• Leaning above normal temperature.
Other Water Supply Considerations:
• The Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT) system is in a healthy state with 110% equivalent quota
in project reserves, this on top of the initial quota allocation and carryover. See Northern
Water’s Storage and Delivery Report attached.
• In October, Northern Water set the initial 2023 quota at 40% due to uncertainty regarding
Colorado River Basin drought management policy and Northern Water’s commitment to
system resiliency. Typically, the initial quota is set at 50%.
• An additional quota is issued in April each year and more can be issued by the board
in later months. For water year 2022, the additional quota was 20% followed by
another 10% in June to supplement agriculture experiencing dry conditions, for a
total quota of 80%.
• Once the additional quota is allocated in April, our Water Shortage Action
Committee will assess snowpack, soil moisture, climate outlook and reservoir
storage to determine if a water shortage declaration will be necessary.
• Water Resources Division is closely monitoring the hydrology of the Colorado River basin,
the statewide and regional discussions around the Colorado River Compact, and any demand
management action by the Federal Bureau of Reclamation in response to drought in the
Colorado River basin.
• Water Resources Division maintains close communication with Northern Water regarding
any drought response or policy action affecting the CBT system. As of now, there is no
indication of drought management action needed from Northern Water.
• If we need to implement water restrictions, we have the Water Shortage Action Plan
(WSAP) to guide our decisions and actions (fcgov.com/WSAP).
City of Fort Collins Utilities
Treated Water Monthly Summary
2022
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year to
Date
WTF Water Supply (MG)
From Poudre 161.6 0.0 190.8 293.2 122.3 288.4 431.0 335.7 466.1 268.4 2,557.5
From Horsetooth 289.9 433.3 306.1 297.1 696.5 785.3 756.4 856.4 549.4 386.8 5,357.2
Total Raw Water 451.5 433.3 496.8 590.3 818.8 1,073.8 1,187.3 1,192.1 1,015.6 655.2 7,914.7
Demands (MG)
WTF Production 436.0 415.4 468.3 557.2 780.5 1,025.9 1,134.5 1,143.8 974.0 630.4 7,565.9
Change in Storage -1.6 -1.0 4.0 4.7 -0.2 0.5 0.7 0.8 -2.2 -0.6 5.0
Demand on WTF 437.6 416.4 464.4 552.5 780.7 1,025.4 1,133.8 1,143.0 976.3 630.9 7,560.9
From Soldier Canyon 21.8 7.1 14.4 48.7 174.5 307.9 348.5 321.7 263.9 74.4 1,582.9
To Soldier Canyon 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.1
To FC-Lov/NWCWD -39.6 -33.2 -48.4 -96.0 -235.9 -407.7 -469.8 -456.3 -379.4 -137.9 -2,304.1
For City 419.8 390.3 430.4 505.3 719.3 925.6 1,012.4 1,008.4 860.8 567.4 6,839.7
Daily Deliveries to City (MG)
Max During Month 14.8 15.7 14.8 24.3 29.7 35.7 37.4 35.9 35.3 24.4 37.4
Min During Month 12.1 13.4 12.7 13.9 18.2 21.9 25.8 27.7 21.5 14.3 12.1
Avg During Month 13.5 13.9 13.9 16.8 23.2 30.9 32.7 32.5 28.7 18.3 22.4
Monthly Deliveries (Ac-Ft)
Projected 1,369 1,247 1,392 1,551 1,961 2,959 3,329 3,251 2,760 1,685 1,338 1,339 24,181
Actual 1,288 1,198 1,321 1,551 2,208 2,841 3,107 3,095 2,642 1,741 20,990
Ratio 94%96%95%100%113%96%93%95%96%103%87%
Year to Date Deliveries (Ac-Ft)
Projected 1,369 2,616 4,008 5,559 7,520 10,479 13,808 17,058 19,819 21,503 22,842 24,181 24,181
Actual 1,288 2,486 3,807 5,358 7,565 10,406 13,513 16,607 19,249 20,990 20,990
Ratio 94%95%95%96%101%99%98%97%97%98%87%
C-BT Project Storage
Lake Granby Storage in Lake Granby increased 2,143 acre-feet last month
Horsetooth Reservoir Storage in Horsetooth Reservoir decreased 14,743 acre-feet last month
Carter Lake Storage in Carter Lake decreased 14,494 acre-feet last month
November 1, 2022
483,266
60,293
79,716
181,823
Total Storage
Granby Carter Horsetooth Empty
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
Acre‐FeetNovember 1 Total Storage
483,266
52,867
Acre‐Feet
8240
8250
8260
8270
8280
8290
Nov‐17Feb‐18May‐18Aug‐18Nov‐18Feb‐19May‐19Aug‐19Nov‐19Feb‐20May‐20Aug‐20Nov‐20Feb‐21May‐21Aug‐21Nov‐21Feb‐22May‐22Aug‐22Elevation (ft)79,716
77,019
Acre‐Feet
5360
5380
5400
5420
5440
Nov‐17Feb‐18May‐18Aug‐18Nov‐18Feb‐19May‐19Aug‐19Nov‐19Feb‐20May‐20Aug‐20Nov‐20Feb‐21May‐21Aug‐21Nov‐21Feb‐22May‐22Aug‐22Elevation (ft)60,293
51,937
Acre‐Feet
5660
5680
5700
5720
5740
5760
5780
Nov‐17Feb‐18May‐18Aug‐18Nov‐18Feb‐19May‐19Aug‐19Nov‐19Feb‐20May‐20Aug‐20Nov‐20Feb‐21May‐21Aug‐21Nov‐21Feb‐22May‐22Aug‐22Elevation (ft)
C-BT Delivery Obligations
Notes:
C-BT Project Allocated Water
October 31, 2022
C-BT Active Storage
1) Quota set at 80%
2) Carryover - Entites certified 54,014 Acre-Feet of Carryover for WY2022.
for Carryover so that adequate supplies are set aside to fulfill all potential obligations.
3) Regional Pool - Additional water acrued to the Regional Pool on April 30, 2022. There is 19,547 Acre-Feet in the
Regional Pool for WY 2022.
137%, Project Reserves
33%, Certified Quota
0%, Collateral
0%, Carryover
2%, Replacement and
Contracts
4%, Windy Gap
62%,
Empty
Project Reserves
Regional Pool
Certified Quota
Collateral
Carryover
Replacement and Contracts
Windy Gap
Empty
% number represents equivalent quota
0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000
Acre-Feet
Quota
Delivered Remaining
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000
Acre-Feet
Carryover
Delivered Remaining Max Potential
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Acre-Feet
Replacement
Delivered Remaining
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000
Acre-Feet
Regional Pool
Delivered Remaining Unallocated
C-BT Delivery Obligations
Notes:
C-BT Project Allocated Water
November 1, 2022 Preliminary Data
C-BT Active Storage
1) Initial Quota set at 40%
2) Carryover - Carryover will not be certified until April 30. Until that date, the Maximum Potential Carryover is reported for
so that adequate supplies are set aside to fulfill all potential obligations.
3) Regional Pool - Additional water will accrue to the Regional Pool until April 30. The current volume reflects water supplies
not eligible for the Carryover Program.
110%, Project Reserves
40%, Certified Quota
0%, Collateral
19%, Carryover
2%, Replacement and
Contracts
4%, Windy Gap
62%, Empty Project Reserves
Regional Pool
Certified Quota
Collateral
Carryover
Replacement and Contracts
Windy Gap
Empty
% number represents equivalent quota
0 50,000 100,000 150,000
Acre-Feet
Quota
Delivered Remaining
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000
Acre-Feet
Carryover
Delivered Remaining Max Potential
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Acre-Feet
Replacement
Delivered Remaining
0 10,000 20,000 30,000
Acre-Feet
Regional Pool
Delivered Remaining Unallocated
C-BT Project Deliveries
November 1, 2022
Deliveries by Area Deliveries by Use
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022Acre-FeetAdams Tunnel
Total YTD
0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Acre-Feet
C-BT Project Deliveries
Includes Quota, Carryover, Regional Pool and Noncharge
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
41%
54%
5%
October
Carter
Horsetooth
Other 44%
47%
9%
Water Year
Carter
Horsetooth
Other
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022Acre-FeetHorsetooth Carter Other
45%
55%
October
Agriculture
M&I 41%59%
Water Year
Agriculture
M&I
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022Acre-FeetAgriculture M&I
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
1
ARTICLE _____
CITY OF FORT COLLINS COLORADO
GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS FOR
AREAS AND ACTIVITIES OF STATE INTEREST
CONTENTS
Division 1: General Provisions, Designation, and Exemptions
Division 2: Permits
Division 3: Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic Water and Sewage
Treatment Systems and Major Extensions of such Systems
Division 4: Site Selection of Arterial Highways and Interchanges and Collector Highways
Division 5: Permit Hearing Procedures, Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration,
Enforcement
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
2
Division 1
General Provisions, Designation, and Exemptions
Section 1 Introductory and General Provisions
1-101 Title and Citation
1-102 Purpose and Findings; Scope
1-103 Authority
1-104 Applicability
1-105 Permit Required; Allowed Use Not Required; Stay On Issuance of Easements and Other
Permits
1-106 Relationship of Regulations to other City, State and Federal Requirements
1-107 Maps
1-108 Modification of Standards, Variances, and Appeal from Administrative Decisions
to the Land Use Review Commission Not Applicable
1-109 Severability
1-110 Definitions
Section 2 Procedure for Designation of Matters of State Interest
1-201 City Council to Make Designations
1-202 Public Hearing Required
1-203 Notice of Public Hearing; Publication
1-204 Matters to be Considered at Designation Hearing
1-205 Record of Designation Proceeding
1-206 Adoption of Designation and Regulations
1-207 Effect of Notice of Designation – Moratorium until Final Determination
1-208 Mapping Disputes
Section 3 Designated Activities of State Interest
1-301 Designated Areas and Activities of State Interest
Section 4 Exemptions
1-401 Exemptions
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
3
DIVISION 1
General Provisions, Designation, and Exemptions
Section 1
Introductory and General Provisions
1-101 Title and Citation
The various regulations constituting Divisions 1 through 5 of Article __ are titled and may be cited
as the “Guidelines and Regulations for Areas and Activities of State Interest of the City of Fort
Collins,” or “Regulations.”
1-102 Purpose and Findings
(A) Purpose. The general purpose of these Regulations is to facilitate identification,
designation, and administration of matters of state interest consistent with the statutory
requirements and criteria set forth in Section 24-65.1-101, et seq., C.R.S., The specific
purposes are to:
(1) Protect public health, safety, welfare, the environment, and historic and wildlife
resources;
(2) Implement the vision and policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan;
(3) Ensure that infrastructure, growth and development in the City occur in a planned and
coordinated manner;
(4) Protect natural, historic, and cultural resources; protect and enhance natural habitats
and features of significant ecological value as defined in Section 5.6.13.4.1; protect air
and water quality,; reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance adaptation to climate
change;
(5) Promote safe, efficient, and economic use of public resources in developing and
providing community and regional infrastructure, facilities, and services;
(6) Regulate land use on the basis of environmental, social and financial, social and
environmental impacts of proposed development on the community and surrounding
areas; and
(7) Ensure City participation in the review and approval of development plans that pass
through and impact City residents, businesses, neighborhoods, property owners,
resources and other assetsresources.
(B) Findings. The City Council of the City of Fort Collins finds that:
(1) The notice and public hearing requirements of Section 24-65.1-404, C.R.S., have been
followed in adopting these Regulations;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
4
(2) These Regulations are necessary because of the intensity of current and foreseeable
development pressures on and within the City;
(3) These Regulations are necessary to protect the public health, safety, welfare, the
environment, and cultural and wildlife resources;
(4) These Regulations apply to the entire area within the incorporated municipal
boundaries of the City; and
(5) These Regulations interpret and apply to any regulations adopted for specific areas of
state interest and specific activities of state interest which have been or may be
designated by the City Council.
1-103 Authority.
These Regulations are authorized by, inter alia, Fort Collins City Charter Article I, Section 4,
Colorado Constitution Article XX, Section 24-65.1-101, et seq., C.R.S.; Section 30-23-101, et
seq., and Section 29-20-101, et seq., C.R.S.
1-104 Applicability.
These Regulations shall apply to all proceedings and decisions concerning identification,
designation, and regulation of any development in any area of state interest or any activity of state
interest that has been or may hereafter be designated by the City Council.
(A) To the extent a development plan could be reviewed under these Regulations and also as a
Site Plan Advisory Review, Overall Development Plan, Project Development Plan, Final
Plan, Basic Development Review, or Minor or Major Amendment, or other site-specific
development plan, such development plan shall only be reviewed under these Regulations
unless the Director issues a FONAISI pursuant to Section 2-3042-303 or an exemption as
set forth in Section 1-401 applies, in which case the development plan shall instead be
reviewed under the other applicable review process.
(B) Development plans that have completed Site Plan Advisory Review pursuant to the Land
Use Code prior to the effective date of these Regulations shall be subject to these
Regulations unless a FONSIFONAI is issued or an exemption applies.
(C) City Council has designated as an activity of state interest subject to these Regulations, the
Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic Water and Sewage Treatment
Systems and the Major Extension of Existing Domestic Water and Sewage Treatment
Systems. Definitions for major new domestic water systems and major new sewage
treatment systems and major extensions of each are set forth in Section 1-110.
(D) City Council has also designated as an activity of state interest subject to these Regulations,
the Site Selection of Arterial Highways and Interchanges and Collector Highways.
Definitions for determining which development plans for arterial highways, interchanges
and collector highways are subject to these Regulations are set forth in Section 1-110.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
5
1-105 Permit Required; Allowed Use Not Required; Stay On Issuance of Easements and
Other Permits
(A) Permit Required.
Other than as stated in Sections 1-104 and 1-401, no person may conduct a designated
activity of state interest or develop in a designated area of state interest within the City
without first obtaining an administrative permit, full permit, or a permit amendment under
these Regulations.
(B) Allowed Use in Zone District Not Required.
A permit pursuant to these Regulations may be issued for a development plan that is to be
located in one or more zone districts regardless of whether the zone district or districts list
the use proposed by the development plan as an allowed use or otherwise prohibit such
use.
(C) Stay on Issuance of Easements and Other Permits
No easements on City-owned real property and no permits issued by the City other than
under these Regulations, including but not limited to flood plain and right-of-way
encroachment permits, shall be granted for any development plan subject to these
Regulations without such development plan having first obtained a permit pursuant to these
Regulations or as otherwise allowed under these Regulations.
1-106 Relationship of Regulations to Other City, State and Federal Requirements.
(A) Whenever these Regulations are found to be inconsistent with any other resolution,
ordinance, code, regulation, or other enactment of the City, the enactment imposingLand
Development Code provision, the more restrictive stringent standards or requirements shall
control.
(B) In the event these Regulations are found to be less stringent than the statutory criteria for
administration of matters of state interest set forth in Section 24-65.1-202, C.R.S., the
statutory criteria shall control.
(C) In the event these Regulations are found to be more stringent than the statutory criteria for
administration of matter of state interest set forth in Sections 24-65.1-202 and 24-65.1-204,
C.R.S., these Regulations shall control pursuant to the authority of Section 24-65.1-402
(3), C.R.S.
(D) Unless otherwise specified in these Regulations, Tthese Regulations are intended to be
applied in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other City regulations or policies, including,
without limitation, the Land Use Development Code, as amended, Natural Areas Easement
Policy, and regulations regarding flood plain and encroachment permits as set forth in the
Code of the City of Fort Collins.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
6
(E) Permit requirements included in these Regulations shall be in addition to and in
conformance with all applicable local, state, and federal water quality and air quality, and
environmental laws, rules, and regulations.
(F) Review or approval of a development plan by a federal or state or local agency does not
substitute for a permit under these Regulations. Any applicant for a permit under these
Regulations that is also subject to the regulations of other agencies may request in writing
that the City application and review process be coordinated with that of the other agency
or agencies. If practicable, and in its their discretion, the Director may attempt to eliminate
redundant application submittal requests and may coordinate City review of the application
with that of other agencies as appropriate.
(G) These Regulations shall not be construed as modifying or amending existing laws or court
decrees with respect to the determination and administration of water rights.
1-107 Maps.
(A) Each map referred to in designations and regulations for any particular matter of state
interest adopted by the City Council is deemed adopted therein as if set out in full.
(B) Maps referred to in any such designations and regulations shall be available for inspection
in the offices of the Community Development and Neighborhood Services Department.
1-108 Modification of Standards, Variances, and Appeal from Administrative Decisions to
the Land Use Review Commission Not Applicable.
The following Land DevelopmentUse Code Divisions are not applicable to these Regulations:
(A) Division 26.8-- Modification of Standards;
(B) Division 6.142.10 – Variances; and
(C) Division 6.182.11 – Appeal from Administrative Decisions to the Land Use Review
Commission
1-109 Severability.
If any division, section, clause, provision, or portion of these Regulations should be found to be
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall not
be affected thereby.
1-110 Definitions.
The words and terms used in these Regulations shall have the meanings set forth below or in
Article 75 subject to Section 6.24.91.4.9 regarding the rules of construction for text:
Adequate security shall mean such funds or funding commitments, whether in the form of cash,
negotiable securities, letters of credit, bonds or other instruments or guarantees, as are deemed
sufficient, in the Director’s discretion, and in a form approved by the City Attorney, to guarantee
performance of the act, promise, permit condition or obligation to which it pertains.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
7
Administrative permit shall mean a permit under these Regulations that is subject to Director
review and decision pursuant to the Land Use Code basic development review procedure set forth
in Divisions 2.18 and 2.20 and these Regulations.Adverse impact shall mean the direct or indirect
negative effect or consequence resulting from development. Adverse impact shall refer to the
negative physical, environmental, economic, visual, auditory, or social consequences or effects
that may or may not be avoidable or fully mitigable. Adverse impacts may include reasonably
foreseeable effects or consequences caused by the development that may occur later in time or be
cumulative in nature.
Aquifer recharge area shall mean any area where surface water may infiltrate to a water-bearing
stratum of permeable rock, sand or gravel. This definition also applies to wells used for disposal
of wastewater or toxic pollutants.
Arterial highway shall mean any limited access highway that is part of the federal-aid interstate
system, any limited access highway constructed under the supervision of the Colorado Department
of Transportation, or any private toll road constructed or operated under the authority of a private
toll road company. Arterial highway does not include a city street or local service road or a county
road designed for local service and constructed under the supervision of local government.
Collector highway shall mean a major thoroughfare serving as a corridor or link between
municipalities, unincorporated population centers or recreation areas, or industrial centers and
constructed under guidelines and standards established by, or under the supervision of, the
Colorado Department of Transportation. Collector highway does not include a city street or local
service road or a county road designed for local service and constructed under the supervision of
local government.
Collector sewer shall mean a network of pipes and conduits through which sewage flows to an
interceptor main and/or a sewage treatment plant.
Designation shall mean only that legal procedure specified by Section 24-65.1-401, et seq., C.R.S.,
and carried out by the City Council.
Disproportionately Impacted Community or DIC shall mean a community that is in a census block
group where the proportion of households that are low income, that identify as minority, or that
are housing cost-burdened is greater than 40% as such terms are defined in Section 24-4-
109(2)(b)(II), C.R.S., and as amended.
Distribution system shall mean a network of pipes and conduits through which water is piped for
human consumption or a network of pipes and conduits through which water is piped in exchange
or trade for human consumption.
Domestic water and sewage treatment system shall mean a wastewater treatment facility, water
distribution system, or water treatment facility, as defined in Section 25-9-102(5), (6) and (7),
C.R.S., and any system of pipes, structures and facilities through which wastewater is collected
for treatment.
FONASI shall mean a finding of no significantnegligible adverse impact pursuant to Section 2-
3043.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
8
Full permit shall mean a permit under these Regulations that is subject to City Council review and
decision pursuant to the Land Use Code areas and activities of state interest procedure set forth in
Division 2.20 and these Regulations.
Highways shall mean state and federal highways.
Historic resource shall have the meaning set forth in Chapter 14 of the Code of the City of Fort
Collins.
Historic resource impact area shall mean an area within which development activities may have
significant impacts upon historic resources of statewide or City importance.
Impact shall mean the direct or indirect effect or consequence resulting from development. The
term shall include physical, environmental, economic, visual, auditory, or social consequences or
effects.
Impact area shall mean the geographic areas, including the development site, in which any adverse
impacts are likely to be caused by the development.
Interceptor mainline shall mean a pipeline that receives wastewater flows from collector sewers
to a wastewater treatment facility or to another interceptor line or meeting other requirements of
the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to be classified as an interceptor.
Interchange shall mean the intersection of two or more highways, roads or streets, at least one of
which is an arterial highway or toll road where there is direct access to and from the arterial
highway or toll road.
Major extension of an existing wastewater treatment system shall mean any modification of an
existing wastewater treatment plant or lift station that will result in a material change, or any
extension or upgrade of existing interceptor lines provided such extension or upgrade meets the
Land Use Code definition of the term development. Major extensions shall not include wastewater
mains or service lines.
Major extension of an existing domestic water treatment system shall mean the expansion of an
existing domestic water treatment plant or capacity for storage that will result in a material change,
or the extension or upgrade of existing transmission lines or new pump station, provided the
extension or upgrade meets the Land Use Code definition of the term development. Major
extensions shall not include service lines or distribution lines.
Major new domestic wastewater treatmentsewage system shall mean:
1. Aa new wastewater treatment plant; or
2. A new lift station, interceptor mainlines or collector sewer andused lift station(s) for the
purposes of transporting and treating wastewater that meets one or more of the following
criteria:
a. Is located wholly or partly on, under, over or within an existing or planned future
City natural area or park, whether developed or undeveloped.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
9
b. Is located wholly or partly on, under, over or within a City-owned, non-right-of-
way, property or current or anticipated City building site, whether developed or
undeveloped.
c. Is located within an existing or potential future buffer zone of a natural habitat or
feature, as defined in Land Development Code Section 5.6.1, whether established
or not.
d. Has potential to adversely impact historic resources.
Major new domestic water system shall mean:
1. Aa system of wells, water diversions, transmission mains, distribution mains,
ditches, structures, and facilities, including water reservoirs, water storage tanks, water
treatment plants or impoundments and their associated structures, through which a water
supply is obtained, stored, and sold or distributed for domestic uses; or
2. Aa system of wells, water diversions, transmission mainslines, distribution mains,
ditches, structures, and facilities, including water reservoirs, water storage tanks, water
treatment plants or impoundments and their associated structures, through which a water
supply is obtained that will be used directly or by trade, substitution, augmentation, or
exchange for water that will be used for human consumption or household use;.
And all or part of a system described in 1. or 2. above meets one or more of the following
criteria:
1. Is located on, under, over or within an existing or planned future City natural area or park,
whether developed or undeveloped.
2. Is located wholly or partly on, under, over or within a City-owned, non-right-of-way,
property or current or anticipated City building site, whether developed or undeveloped.
3. Is located within a buffer zone of an existing or potential future natural habitat or feature,
as defined in Land Development Code Section 5.6.1.
4. Has potential to adversely impact historic resources.
In determining whether a proposed development plan is a major new domestic water supply
system, the Director may consider water rights decrees, pending water rights applications,
intergovernmental agreements, treaties, water supply contracts and any other evidence of the
ultimate use of the water for domestic, human consumption or household use. In order to be a
major new domestic water system, such system must meet the Land Use Code definition of
development. Major new domestic water system shall not include service lines or distribution lines.
Major extension of an existing domestic water treatment system shall mean the expansion of an
existing domestic water treatment plant or capacity for storage that will result in a material change,
or the extension or upgrade of existing transmission mains, distribution mains, or new pump
stations that will result in a material change.
Major extension of an existing sewage treatment system shall mean any modification of an existing
wastewater treatment plant or lift station that will result in a material change, or any extension or
upgrade of existing interceptor main or collector sewer that will result in a material change.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
10
Material change shall mean any change in an approved development plan as approved under these
Regulations which significantly changes the scale, magnitude, or nature of the approved
development plan or the adverse impacts considered by the Permit Authority in approval of the
original permit; or in the case of existing development not previously issued a permit or a proposed
development plan for which a FONAI was issued, a structural modification, change of use, change
of operation, change of user, or change of location that significantly changes the scale, magnitude,
or nature or location of (1) the existing development or development plan for which a FONAI was
issued, or (2)and its the associated adverse impacts.
Matter of state interest shall mean an area of state interest or an activity of state interest or both.
Mitigation shall mean avoiding an impact; minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude
of the action or its implementation; rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring
the impact area, facility or service; or compensation for the impact by replacing or providing for
the replacement of biological or physical conditions, services or facilities.
Permit shall mean an administrative or fulla permit issued under these Regulations to conduct an
activity of state interest or to engage in development in an area of state interest, or both. See also
the defined terms administrative permit and full permit.
Permit Authority shall mean, the City Council or with respect to matters delegated by these
Regulations, the Director and the Planning and Zoning Commission, as established and further
described in Section 2-101. Director for a FONSI, level of permit review, and administrative
permits, the Planning and Zoning Commission for appeals of Director FONSI, level of permit
review, and administrative permit decisions and for recommendations to City Council regarding
full permits, and the City Council for full permits and appeals of Planning and Zoning Commission
decisions for appeals of Director FONSI, level of permit review, and administrative permit
decisions.
Responsible party shall, for the purpose of providing required financial security, mean the person
or persons responsible for construction or operation of a permitted development in an area of state
interest, or a permitted activity of state interest under these Regulations. This term includes all
persons responsible for compliance with any permit condition.
Significant shall mean deserving to be considered important, notable, and not trifling.
Site selection of arterial highways and interchanges and collector highways shall mean the
determination of a specific corridor or facility location which is made at the conclusion of the
corridor location studies in which:
1. Cconstruction of an arterial highway, interchange, or collector highway is
proposed; or
2. Eexpansion or modification of an existing arterial highway, interchange or
collector highway is proposedthat would result in either a. or b., or any
combination thereof, occurring as follows:
a. An increase in road capacity by at least one (1) vehicle lane through widening
or alternative lane configuration and:
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
11
1. Requires additional right of way from an existing or planned future
City natural area or park, or other City-owned property, whether
developed or undeveloped;
2. Where the widening occurs within an existing or potential future
buffer zone of a natural habitat or feature, as defined in Land
Development Code Section 5.6.1;
3. Where the widening has potential to adversely impact historic
resources; or
4. The development may result in the relocation of households or
businesses.
b. Expansion or modification of an existing interchange or bridge that:
1. Requires additional right of way within an existing or planned future
City natural area or park, or other City-owned property, whether
developed or undeveloped;
2. Where the expansion or modification occurs within an existing or
potential future buffer zone of a natural habitat or feature, as defined
in Land Development Code Section 5.6.1;
3. Where the expansion or modification has potential to adversely
impact historic resources; or
4. The development may result in the relocation of households or
businesses.
, provided that site selection or expansion of highways or interchanges meets
the definition of development in the Land Use Code. This shall also mean the
closure of frontage roads in association with arterial highways, interchanges,
and collector highways.
Source development area shall mean the geographic area or region wholly or partially within the
municipal boundaries of the City which will be developed or altered in connection with the
development of a municipal or industrial water project.
Transmission mainline shall mean a domestic water supply system’s line that is designed to
transport raw or treated water from a water source to a water treatment plant, storage facility or
distribution systems, and having the characteristic that it does not allow customer service taps.
Wastewater treatment plant shall mean a facility or group of units used for treatment
of industrial or domestic wastewater or the reduction and handling of solids and gases removed
from such wastes, whether or not such facility or group of units discharges into state waters.
Wastewater treatment plant specifically excludes individual wastewater disposal systems such as
septic tanks or leach fields.
Water Distribution main shall mean a domestic water supply system’s pipeline that is designed to
transport treated water from a transmission main to individual water customers through service
laterals.
Water Distribution system shall mean a network of pipes and conduits through which water is
piped for human consumption or a network of pipes and conduits through which water is piped in
exchange or trade for human consumption.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
12
Water diversion shall mean removing water from its natural course or location or controlling water
in its natural course or location by means of a control structure, canal, flume, reservoir,
bypass, pipeline, conduit, well, pump or other structure or device.
Water treatment plant shall mean the facilities within the domestic water supply system that
regulate the physical, chemical or bacteriological quality of the water.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
13
DIVISION 1
Administrative Regulations
Section 2
Procedure for Designation of Matters of State Interest
1-201 City Council to Make Designations.
Designations and amendments of designations may be initiated in twothree ways:
(A) The City Council may in its discretion designate and adopt regulations for the
administration of any matter of state interest.
(B) The Planning and Zoning Commission may on its own motion or upon City Council
request, recommend the designation of matters of state interest to City Council. The City
Council shall decide, in its sole discretion, whether or not to designate any or all of the
requested matters of state interest.
(C) City staff may request that City Council designate an area or activity of state interest and
adopt regulations for the administration of the matter designated. The City Council shall
decide, in its sole discretion, whether or not to designate any or all of the requested matters
of state interest.
1-202 Public Hearing Required.
The City Council shall hold a public hearing before designating any matter of state interest and
adopting regulations for the administration thereof. Said hearing shall be held not less than thirty
(30) days nor more than sixty (60) days after the giving of public notice of said hearing.
1-203 Notice of Public Hearing; Publication.
(A) The City shall prepare a notice of the designation hearing which shall include:
(1) The time and place of the hearing;
(2) The place at which materials relating to the matter to be designated and any guidelines
and regulations for the administration thereof may be examined;
(3) The telephone number and e-mail address where inquiries may be answered;
(4) A description of the area or activity proposed to be designated in sufficient detail to
provide reasonable notice as to property which would be included.
(B) At least thirty (30) days, but no more than sixty (60) days before the public hearing, the
City shall publish the notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and shall mail
the notice to each of the following as deemed appropriate in the City’s discretion:
(1) State and federal agencies;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
14
(2) Any local government jurisdiction that would be directly or indirectly affected by the
designation.
1-204 Matters to be Considered at Designation Hearing.
At the public hearing, the City Council shall receive into the public record:
(A) Testimony and evidence from any and all persons or organizations desiring to appear and
be heard, including City staff;
(B) Any documents that may be offered; and
(C) The recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
1-205 Record of Designation Proceeding.
The City Council shall collect and preserve the following record of the public hearing:
1-206 Adoption of Designations and Regulations.
(A) City Council shall consider the following when determining whether to designate an area
or activity to be of state interest:
(1) All testimony, evidence and documents taken and admitted at the public hearing;
(2) The intensity of current and foreseeable development pressures in the City;
(3) The matters and considerations set forth in any applicable guidelines or model
regulations issued by the Colorado Land Use commission and other State agencies; and
(4) Reasons why the particular area or activity is of state interest, the dangers that would
result from uncontrolled development of any such area or uncontrolled conduct of such
activity, and the advantages of development of such area or conduct of such activity in
a coordinated manner.
(B) Any City Council order designating an area or activity to be of state interest and the
adoption of any regulations for the administration of an area or activity of state interest
shall be by ordinance.
(C) In the event the City Council finally determines that any matter is a matter of state interest
within the City, it shall be the City Council’s duty to designate such matter and adopt
regulations for the administration thereof.
(D) Each designation order adopted by the City Council shall:
(1) Specify the boundaries of the designated area of state interest or the boundary of the
area in which an activity of state interest has been designated; and
(2) State reasons why the particular area or activity is of state interest, the dangers that
would result from uncontrolled development of any such area or uncontrolled conduct
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
15
of such activity, and the advantages of development of such area or conduct of such
activity in a coordinated manner.
1-207 Effect of Designation – Moratorium Until Final Determination.
After a matter of state interest is designated, no person shall engage in development in such area
and no such activity shall be conducted until the designation and regulations for such area or
activity are finally determined as required by Section 24-65.1-404 (4), C.R.S.
1-208 Mapping Disputes.
Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundary of any designated area and
where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions, the
City Council shall make the necessary boundary determination at a public hearing after providing
notice pursuant to Section 1-203.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
16
DIVISION 1
Administrative Regulations
Section 3
Designated Activities of State Interest
1-301 Designated Activities of State Interest.
The City Council has designated the following matters of state interest for regulation:
(A) Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic Water and Sewage
Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Existing Domestic Water and Sewage
Treatment Systems (Ordinance No. 22, 2021)
(B) Site Selection of Arterial Highways and Interchanges and Collector Highways
(Ordinance No. 22, 2021)
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
17
DIVISION 1
Administrative Regulations
Section 4
Exemptions
1-401 Exemptions.
These Regulations are not applicable to the following:
(A) Any use otherwise lawfully existing on the date the area or activity is designated or
subjected to these Regulations which use becomes nonconforming as a result of the
adoption of these Regulations. Such nonconforming uses shall be governed by Division
6.161.5 with the exception that enlargement or expansion of nonconforming uses shall
require a permit under these Regulations. An enlargement or expansion requiring a permit
shall not include the maintenance, repair or replacement of existing buildings or structures
associated with such use, including retrofitting or updating technology, provided any
changes do not result in a material change as determined by the Director. Enlargements or
expansions not requiring a permit may still be subject to Section 6.16.51.5.5.
(B) Any approved development plan that would be subject to these Regulations but for which
a currently valid building permit has been issued by the City as of the effective date of
these Regulations.
(C) Any proposed project that would be subject to these Regulations but does not meet the
Land Use Code definition of development.
(B) (D) Any site specific development plan that would be subject to these Regulations but has
received final Cityplan approval as of the effective date of these Regulations so long as the
vested rights for such final approved site specific development plan have not expired. This
The exemption does not apply to any subsequent modifications to the approved finalsite
specific development plan or expansion of the development site that was not included
within the City approved application and for which a new or revised development
application is required.
(C) Any proposed development plan otherwise subject to these Regulations but such proposed
development plan is (1) subject to review and approval as part of the review of a proposed
residential, commercial, industrial or mixed-use project under a development review
process other than Site Plan Advisory Review under the Land Development Code, and (2)
which proposed development plan is directly necessitated by a proposed residential,
commercial, industrial or mixed-use development.
(D) Any proposed development plan issued a FONAI pursuant to Section 2-304.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
18
Division 2
Permits
Section 1 Permit Authority
2-101 Permit Authority Established
Section 2 Intergovernmental Agreement In Lieu of Permit
2-201 Intergovernmental Agreement In Lieu of Permit
Section 3 Permit Application Procedures
2-301 Application Procedure Overview
2-302 Application Fee; Financial Security Waiver
2-303 Determination of Level of Permit Review
2-3034 Pre-Application Area or Activity Review
2-304 Determination of Applicability of Regulations- FONAI
2-305 Neighborhood Meeting
2-306 Application Submission Requirements
2-307 Determination of Completeness
2-308 Referral Agencies
2-309 Simultaneous Processing of Associated Development Applications
2-310 Combined Application for Multiple Activities or Development in More than One
Area of State Interest.
2-311 Permit Decision Making Procedures
2-312 Conduct of Full Permit Hearings
2-313 Approval or Denial of Permit Application
2-314 Issuance of Permit, Conditions
Section 4 Common Review Standards
2-401 Review Standards for All Applications
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
19
DIVISION 2
Permits
Section 1
Permit Authority
2-101 Permit Authority Established.
(A) The Fort Collins Permit Authority is hereby established consisting of the Fort Collins
City Council, or with respect to matters delegated by these Regulations, the Director
and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
(B) The Director shall be the decision maker regarding issuing or not issuing a
FONSI,FONAIlevel of permit review, and administrative permits. Administrative
permits are reviewed pursuant to the basic development review procedure set forth in
Divisions 2.18 and 2.20 and these Regulations.
(C) The Planning and Zoning Commission shall be the decision maker regarding appeals
of Director decisions to issue or not issue a FONSIFONAI, level of permit review,
and administrative permit decisions and recommendations to City Council regarding
full permits.
(D) The City Council shall be the decision maker for approving or not approving permits.
The City Council shall also be the decision maker regarding appeals of Planning and
Zoning Commission decisions regarding the appeal of Director decisions to issue or
not issue a FONSIFONAI, level of permit review, and administrative permit
decisions and full permits. Full pPermits are reviewed by the City Council pursuant to
the procedure set forth in Division ___2.20 and these Regulations.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
20
Division 2
Permits
Section 2
Intergovernmental Agreement In Lieu of Permit
2-201 Intergovernmental Agreements.
Upon the request of the State of Colorado or a political subdivision of the State, as defined by
Section 29-1-202, C.R.S., proposing to engage in a designated activity of state interest or
development in a designated area of state interest, the requirements of these Regulations may be
met by the approval of an intergovernmental agreement between the City and the State or political
subdivision applicant. The City Council may, but shall be under no obligation to, approve such an
intergovernmental agreement in lieu of requiring an approved permit pursuant to these Regulations
and the approval of any intergovernmental agreement is a legislative act that must occur by
ordinance. In the event such an agreement is approved by the City, no approved permit application
shall be required, provided that all of the following conditions are met:
(A) The State or political subdivision applicant and the City must both be authorized by Article
XIV, Section 18(2) of the Colorado Constitution and Section 29-1-201, et seq., to enter
into the agreement.
(B) The purpose and intent of these Regulations must be satisfied by the terms of the
agreement.
(C) Action on the proposed intergovernmental agreement by the governing body of the State
or political subdivision applicant must be in the manner required of it by the Colorado
Constitution and statutes.
(D) Exercise of the provisions of this Section by the State or political subdivision applicant will
not prevent that entity from electing at any time to seek a permit pursuant to these
Regulations. Additionally, any entity which has previously proceeded under the permit
provisions of these Regulations may at any time elect to proceed instead under this Section.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
21
Division 2
Permits
Section 3
Permit Application Procedures
2-301 Application Procedure Overview.
The application procedure for activities and areas of state interest are described in Land Use
Code Division 2.20 and in these Regulations and must be read together along with other
applicable portions of the Land Development Code in order to fully understand the procedure.
The following summary of the procedure is provided for convenience:
(A) Conceptual/Preliminary Design Review. A proposed development plan first undergoes a
conceptual or preliminary design review, unless waived pursuant to Section 2.20(C)(1),
to determine whether the project may be subject to these Regulations. Based upon the
conceptual or preliminary design review, proposed development plans that may be
subject to these regulations must then undergo a pre-application area or activity review.
(B) Pre-application Area or Activity Review. In addition to providing information on the
application requirements and the review process, the purpose of the pre-application area
or activity review is to determine the level of permit review as described in Sections 2-
303 and 2-304 and whether the permit is:
(1) Not likely to have significant adverse impacts, a finding of no significant impact or
FONSI, and is not subject to these Regulations. The decision to issue or not issue a
FONSI is subject to appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission; or
(2) Subject to administrative permit review; or
(3) Subject to full permit review.
(C) Unless waived pursuant to Section 2-305, a neighborhood meeting must be conducted at
least ten (10) days prior to submittal of a permit application.
(D) Once at least ten (10) days have passed after the neighborhood meeting, if required, a
permit application may be submitted, and the application submission requirements are
described in Section 2-306.
(E) Upon submittal of an application, City review of the application shall not commence until
the Director determines that the application is complete or has informed the applicant of
any additional information required for the application to be deemed complete pursuant
to Section 2-307. Once an application is deemed complete, referral agencies will be
informed of the application pursuant to Section 2-307.
(F) Once the permit application has been fully reviewed, it is ready for a decision and the
timing and procedure for making a decision are described in Sections 2-311 through 2-
314.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
22
(G) The Director’s decisions to issue or not issue a FONSI, determining the appropriate level
of permit review, and to approve or not approve an administrative permit are subject to
appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission
decision on appeal of any of these Director’s decisions is subject to further appeal to City
Council.
2-302 Application Fee; Financial Security Waiver.
(A) Each pre-application area or activity review application and development application for a
permit submitted must be accompanied by the fees established pursuant to Section
2.2.3(D). The Director may determine at any time during the pre-application review and
development application review process that it is necessary to retain a third-party
consultant to assist in reviewing the application pursuant to Section 6.3.32.2.3(D). All costs
incurred in the third-party consultant review shall be borne by the applicant in addition to
the City’s internal application review fees.
(B) A referral agency may impose a fee for the review of a development application and the
applicant shall pay such fee. No hearings by the Permit Authority will be held if any such
referral agency’s fee has not been paid.
2-303 Determination of Level of Permit Review.
The Director shall make the initial determination whether a permit is required pursuant to these
Regulations. There are two levels of permit review under these Regulations: (1) administrative
permit review for which the Director is the decision maker; and (2) full permit review for which
the City Council is the decision maker. The Director shall determine the appropriate level of
permit review based upon the pre-application area and activity review meeting described in
Section 2-304 and any required follow up information or third-party consultation.
(A) FONSI. Based on the information provided at and for the pre-application area and
activity review meeting as described in Section 2-304 and any required follow up
information or third-party consultation, the Director may make a finding that no
significant impacts, or FONSI, are likely to occur from the proposed development plan
and therefore a permit under these Regulations is not required.
(1) The Director may issue a FONSI if the construction or operation of the proposed
development plan in its proposed location without additional mitigation is
unlikely to have any significant adverse impact(s) within the city in consideration
of the applicable approval criteria in these Regulations. The decision to issue or
not issue a FONSI shall be in writing and describe in detail how this criterion has
or has not been met. At the applicant’s cost, the written decision shall be mailed
to the applicant, to the property owners within one-thousand (1000) feet in all
directions of the location of the proposed development plan and shall also be
posted on the City's website at www.fcgov.com.The Director decision to issue or
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
23
not issue a FONSI is subject to appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 2.2.12(D).
(2) If the Director issues a FONSI, the applicant does not need to submit a permit
application under these Regulations. However, issuance of a FONSI does not
exempt the proposed development plan from all Land Use Code requirements and
an alternative review process may be required.
(B) If the Director determines a FONSI is not appropriate and the proposed development plan
is subject to these Regulations, the Director shall determine whether the proposed
development plan should be subject to the administrative permit review or full permit
review process. The Director shall make the determination based on the following
criteria:
Administrative Permit Full Permit
Whether the proposed development
plan has received written consent from
affected property owners or obtained
easements necessary for completion of
the proposed development plan, and
Whether the development plan requires the
use of eminent domain, or
Whether the proposed development
plan will likely result in significant
adverse impacts in only one (1)
category of development standards.
Whether the proposed development plan
will likely result in significant adverse
impacts in two (2) or more categories of
approval criteria.
(1) The Director’s determination of the appropriate level of review shall be based upon
information provided for and at the pre-application review, any additional
information the Director requests from the applicant after the pre-application review,
and any third-party consultant input.
(2) At any time prior to the final decision on a permit application, the Director may
determine that information received subsequent to the level of permit determination
indicates that the nature and scope of the impacts are that of a different level of permit
review. If a different level of permit review is required, the Director shall notify the
applicant in writing within seven (7) days of the Director’s revised determination. If a
revised determination is issued subsequent to the permit application being deemed
complete pursuant to Section 2-307, the schedule and procedure described in Section
2-311 shall reset from the date such revised determination is made as though the
application had been deemed complete on the revised determination date.
(3) Each Director determination or revised determination shall be in writing and describe
in detail the reasons for the determination. The Director shall make this determination
within twenty-eight (28) days after the latter of the pre-application review meeting or
the date of receipt of any requested additional information or third-party consultation.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
24
Each determination shall be in writing and describe in detail the basis for the
determination. At the applicant’s cost, the written decision shall be mailed to the
applicant, to the property owners within one-thousand (1000) feet in all directions of
the location of the proposed development plan and shall also be posted on the City's
website at www.fcgov.com. Director determinations and revised determinations are
subject to appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 2.2.12(D).
(4) The Director’s initial level of review determination and any revised determination
pursuant to (2) above are subject to appeal pursuant to Land Use Code Section
2.2.12(D). The filing of a timely notice of appeal pursuant to Section 2.2.12(D) shall
prevent the Director from revising a determination and decision issued to resolve the
appeal is not subject to Director revision. The filing of a timely notice of appeal shall
stay any time period set forth in Section 2-311 until the appeal is decided and a
change in the level of review from administrative to full permit or vice versa shall
reset the schedule and procedure described in Section 2-311.
2-303 2-304 Pre-Application Area or Activity Review.
(A) After conceptual or preliminary design review has occurred or has been waived pursuant
to Section ___2.20(C)(1), and before holding a neighborhood meeting or submitting a
permit application, the Director shall require a pre-application area or activity review for
proposed development plans that may be subject to these Regulations.
(B) To schedule the pre-application area or activity review, the applicant must first provide the
Director with the following:
(1) Names and addresses of all persons proposing the activity or development;
(2) Name and qualifications of the person(s) responding on behalf of the applicant;
(3) A written summary of the proposed development plan including a map prepared at an
easily readable scale showing:
(a) The boundaries of the proposed development plan;
(b) The relationship of the proposed development plan to surrounding
topographicnatural habitats and features and human-made features and cultural
featuressuch as ridgelines, historic resources, roads, streams, wetlands, and existing
structures;
(c) The location of pProposed buildings, improvements and infrastructure to be
constructed as part of the proposed development plan; and
(d) A written summary of the proposed development plan that sufficiently describes
the impacts of the proposed development plan as it relates to applicable approval
standards set forth in these RegulationsInformation that is sufficient for
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
25
determining the nature of the development plan and degree of impacts associated
with the development plan.
(e) Siting and design alternatives.
(4) The required application fee and applicant agreement to pay the costs of (1) the Director
retaining third-party consultants necessary to assist the Director in making the
determination of the appropriate level of review pursuant toapplicability of these
Regulations pursuant to Section 2-3043; (2) the Director retaining third-party
consultants necessary to assist the Director with the completeness review of any
submitted application pursuant to Section 2-307; and (3) the Director retaining third-
party consultants necessary to assist City staff in reviewing a complete permit
application or City Council in rendering a decision on a permit; and
(5) Any additional information requested by the Director as necessary to make a
determination of the appropriate level of review applicability of these Regulations
pursuant to Section 2-3043.
(C) The purpose of the pre-application meeting is to determine if a permitthe appropriate
permit, if anyis, required for the proposed development plan, application submittal
requirements, procedural requirements, and relevant agencies to coordinate with as part of
any permit review process. Topics of discussion may include, as relevant to the specific
application, but are not limited to:
(1) Characteristics of the activity, including its location, significant proximity to natural
and human-made features, with particular attention to natural hazard, resource or other
special areas; the size and accessibility of the site; surrounding development and land
uses; and its potential impact on surrounding areas, including potential environmental
effects and planned mitigation strategies.
(2) The nature of the development proposed, including land use types and their densities;
placement of proposed buildings, pipelines, structures, operations, and maintenance;
the protection of natural habitats and features, historic resources, and City natural areas,
parks, or other City property or assets; staging areas during construction; alternatives
considered; proposed parking areas and internal circulation system, including trails, the
total ground coverage of paved areas and structures; and types of water and wastewater
treatment systems proposed.
(3) Proposed mitigation of adverse impacts
(4) Siting and design alternatives and reasons why such alternatives are not feasible.
(5) (3) Community policy considerations, including the review process and likely
conformity of the proposed development with the policies and requirements of these
Regulations.
(6) (4) Applicable regulations, review procedures and submission requirements.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
26
(7) (5) Other regulatory reviews or procedures to which the applicant is subject, the
applicant's time frame for the proposed development plan, and other applicant
concerns.
(D) In addition to providing the applicant with a written determination pursuant to Section 2-
3043 of thewhether the Director has made a finding of negligible adverse impacts, or
FONAI,appropriate level of review, if any, the Director shall provide the applicant with
written comments, to the extent such comments differ from comments provided for any
conceptual or preliminary design review, regarding the proposal to inform and assist the
applicant in preparing components of the permit application.
2-304 Determination of Applicability of Regulations- FONAI.
The Director shall determine the applicability of these Regulations based upon the pre-
application area or activity review meeting described in Section 2-303 and any required follow
up information or third-party consultation.
(A) The Director may make a finding of negligible adverse impacts, or FONAI, which has the
effect that no permit under these Regulations is required. The FONAI shall be evaluated
against the applicable review standards set forth in these Regulations as to whether the
proposed development plan may result in negligible adverse impacts in relation to each
respective standard. The FONAI review of negligible adverse impacts may or may not
include consideration of proposed mitigation depending on factors that may include, but
are not limited to, the scale, magnitude, and complexity of mitigation, and the sensitivity
of the resource being mitigated.
(1) If the Director issues a FONAI, the applicant does not need to submit a permit
application under these Regulations. However, issuance of a FONAI does not exempt
the proposed development plan from all Land Development Code requirements, and
an alternative review process may be required.
(2) If the Director issues a FONAI and the applicant subsequently makes material
changes to the development plan, the applicant is required to schedule another pre-
application area or activity review pursuant to Section 2-303 discuss the changes.
Based on the new information and whether the revised development could result in
adverse impacts, the Director may rescind the FONAI by issuing a written
determination pursuant to below Subsection (C) and require a permit under these
Regulations.
(B) Permit Required. If the Director determines a FONAI is not appropriate, the proposed
development plan requires a permit and is subject to these Regulations.
(C) Notice of Director’s Determination.
(1) The Director’s determination to issue a FONAI or require a permit shall be in writing
and describe in detail the reasons for the determination. The Director shall make this
determination within twenty-eight (28) days after the pre-application area or activity
review meeting or the date of receipt of any requested additional information or third-
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
27
party consultation. If a FONAI determination is not made within twenty-eight (28)
days, the proposed development plan shall be deemed not subject to these
Regulations and such deeming shall not be subject to appeal.
(2) At the applicant’s cost, the written decision shall be mailed to the applicant, to the
property owners within one-thousand (1000) feet in all directions of the location of
the proposed development plan as determined by the Director in their reasonable
discretion and shall also be posted on the City's website at www.fcgov.com.
(D) Appeal of the Director’s Determination. The Director’s determination pursuant to (C)
above is subject to appeal pursuant to Land Development Code Section ___. After the
filing of a timely notice of appeal pursuant to Section ___, the Director shall not accept
any application that may be affected by an appeal decision and, if an application has been
accepted, shall cease processing such application until the appeal has been decided,
which in the case of an appeal to Council shall be the date of adoption of the appeal
resolution. The filing of a timely notice of appeal shall reset any time period set forth in
2-307 and 2-311 and such time period shall begin from the date the appeal is decided as
previously described.
2-305 Neighborhood meeting.
If a development plan requires a permit under these Regulations, a Unless waived pursuant to this
Section, a neighborhood meeting is required pursuant to Land Development Code Section
___2.2.2. The meeting must be held at least ten (10) days prior to submission of a permit
application to the Director for completeness review pursuant to these Regulations. The Director
may waive this requirement only for a proposed development plan determined to be subject to
administrative permit review if the Director determines such development plan would not have
significant neighborhood impacts. A neighborhood meeting may not be waived for a proposed
development plan determined to be subject to full permit review. Notice of the neighborhood
meeting shall be given in accordance with Section 2.2.6(A), (B) and (D).
2-306 Application Submission Requirements.
In addition to specific submission requirements for the activities addressed in Divisions 3, 4 and
5, all applications for a permit under these Regulations shall be accompanied by the following
materials, as appropriate in the number required by the Director:
(A) Completed application form in the format established by the Director.
(B) Any plan, study, survey or other information, in addition to the information required by
this Section, at the applicant’s expense, as in the Director’s judgment is necessary to enable
the Permit Authority to make a determination on the application. Such additional
information may include applicant’s written responses to comments by a referral agency.
Additional materials may be required by the Director for a particular type of proposed development
plan. To the extent an applicant has prepared or submitted materials for a federal, state, county, or
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
28
city permit which are substantially the same as required herein, a copy of those materials may be
submitted to satisfy the corresponding requirement below.
2-307 Determination of Completeness.
(A) No permit application may be processed, nor shall a full permit be deemed received
pursuant to Section 24-65.1-501(2)(a), C.R.S., until the Director has determined it to be
complete. Following the pre-application review meeting and neighborhood meeting, the
applicant may submit a permit application only after at least ten (10) days have passed
since the neighborhood meeting and any application must be in the form approved as
Appendix B or C, as applicable to the chosen activity or activities of state interest being
applied for. Upon submittal of the application, the Director shall determine whether the
application is complete or whether additional information is required, and if so, shall
inform the applicant and pause the completeness review until information is received. Any
request for waiver of a submission requirement shall be processed prior to the Director
making a determination that an application is complete. The Director may retain at the
applicant’s cost third-party consultants necessary to assist the Director with the
completeness review.
(B) No determination of completeness may exceed sixty (60) days unless one or more of the
following occurs:
(1) The Director determines in writing that more than sixty (60) days is necessary to
determine completeness in consideration of the size and complexity of the proposed
development plan or available City resources. In such case, the Director shall
determine how many additional days are needed, which shall not exceed sixty (60)
additional days.
(2) The Director and the applicant agree in writing to exceed sixty (60) days.
(C) (B) When the Director has determined that a submitted application is complete, or the time
limit for making the completeness determination has elapsed even though the application
may not be complete, the Director shall note upon the application the date and hour inform
the applicant in writing of the date of its receipt. Only upon the Director’s determination
that an application is complete, or the time limit for making the completeness determination
has elapsed even though the application may not be complete, may the City’s formal review
process commence pursuant to these Regulations.
2-308 Referral Agencies.
All permit applications under these Regulations shall be referred to internal and external review
agencies as determined by the Director, including for pre-application submittals, completeness
reviews and final application submittals. Copies of any such referral agency comments received
shall be promptly forwarded to the applicant for its response at the time that comments are provided
from City review staff.
2-309 Simultaneous Processing of Associated Development Applications.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
29
If a development plan subject to these Regulations contains project components not subject to
these Regulations but subject to other requirements in the Land Use Development Code that result
in an additional and separate different development application, then both development
applications can be processed simultaneously.
2-310 Combined Application for Multiple Activities or Development in More than One
Area of State Interest.
When approval is sought to conduct more than one activity of state interest, engage in development
in more than one area of state interest, or a combination of activities and areas, a combined
application may be completed for all such activities or developments in areas of state interest
determined to have the same level of review pursuant to Section 2-303 and may be reviewed
simultaneously and, if appropriate in the discretion of City Council, a single determination made
to grant or deny permit approval permit issued. The City reserves the right to charge an application
fee pursuant to Section 2-302 of these Regulations for each activity or area that is the subject of a
combined application.
2-311 Permit Decision Making Procedures
When an application has been determined complete by the Director pursuant to Section 2-307 of
these Regulations, or the time limit for making the completeness determination has elapsed even
though the application may not be complete, then, and only then, shall the permit review process
commence. At that time, the following schedule shall apply:
(A) Administrative Permits. For administrative permits, no public hearing is held, and the
application is reviewed and decided pursuant to the basic development review procedure
set forth in Divisions 2.18 and 2.20 and these Regulations. The Director decision on an
administrative permit must be issued within ninety (90) days of the date the application is
determined to be complete pursuant to Section 2-307 or the application shall be deemed
approved. To the extent a permit is deemed approved because the Director has not made a
decision, issuance of a written decision pursuant to Section 2.18.3(G) is not required.
(A) (B)Full Permits.No later than thirty (30) days after the receipt of a completed application,
the Director will schedule a hearing before City Council. The thirty (30) day period to
schedule the hearing may be extended if the applicant agrees to an extension in writing.
Prior to such hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall forward a
recommendation to City Council to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the permit
application.
(B) The Director may retain third-party consultants at the applicant’s expense necessary to
assist City staff in reviewing a complete permit application or assist City Council in
rendering a decision on a permit.
(C) (1)Upon setting a hearing date, the Director shall publish notice once in a newspaper of
general circulation in the City of Fort Collins containing:
(1) (a)The date, time, and place of each permit hearing not less than thirty (30) nor
more than sixty (60) days before the date set for the hearing. The thirty (30) and
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
30
sixty (60) day periods may be extended if the applicant agrees to an extension in
writing.
(2) (b)The date, time, and place of the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing where
a recommendation will be made at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing.
(D) (2)At least fourteen (14) days prior to thea City Council full permit hearing, the Director
shall mail notice of the date, time, and place of the hearing to the applicant and to property
owners pursuant to Section 6.3.62.2.6. Notice of the Planning and Zoning Commission
hearing where a recommendation will be made shall also be mailed at least fourteen (14)
days prior to such hearing pursuant to Section 6.3.62.2.6 and may be combined with the
mailed notice for the City Council hearing.
2-312 Conduct of Full Permit Hearing.
City Council full permit hearings and the associated Planning and Zoning Commission hearings
where a recommendation is made shall follow the requirements and procedures of Section
6.3.72.2.7. With regards to hearings before City Council, the public hearing process shall be
deemed completed at the closing of the public hearing. No further comments or evidence will be
received from the public, agencies or applicant, including at any general public comment period
for a City Council meeting or public comment associated with a specific agenda item such as a
designation associated with a permit application, unless specifically authorized by City Council
the Permit Authority by reopening the public hearing.
2-313 Approval or Denial of Permit Application.
(A) The burden of proof shall be upon the applicant to show compliance with all applicable
standards of the Regulations. To the extent a permit application may not comply with a
particular standard, the applicant may demonstrate compliance with such standard by
proposing mitigation measures that sufficiently offset the extent of noncompliance.
(B) A permit application to conduct a designated activity of state interest or develop in a
designated area of state interest may not be approved unless the applicant satisfactorily
demonstrates that the proposal, in consideration of all proposed mitigation measures,
complies with all the applicable criteria. The permit shall be denied unless City Council
determines that reasonable conditions can be imposed on the permit which will enable the
permit to comply with the applicable criteria.
(C) (B) If the Permit AuthorityCity Council finds that there is insufficient information
concerning any of the applicable standards, Permit AuthorityCity Council may deny the
permit, may approve with conditions which if fulfilled, would bring the development plan
into compliance with all applicable standards, or in the case of a full permit, or may
continue the public hearing, or reopen a previously closed public hearing, for additional
information to be received. However, no such continuance to receive additional evidence
may exceed sixty (60) days unless agreed to by Permit AuthorityCity Council and the
applicant.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
31
(D) (C) The Permit AuthorityCity Council shall approve a permit application if the proposed
development plan satisfies all applicable review standards, in consideration of proposed
mitigation measures, of these Regulations. The Permit AuthorityCity Council may also
impose additional conditions pursuant to Section 2-314 on any permit.
(D) For full permits:
(E) (1)City Council may close the public hearing and make a decision, or it may continue the
matter for a decision only. However, City Council shall make a decision by majority vote
within one hundred twentyninety (90120) days after the closing of the public hearing, or
the permit shall be deemed approved. To the extent the public hearing is reopened and
closed, the closing date of the public hearing shall be measured from the most recent
closing date.
(F) (2) No later than the date of its next regular meeting after making its decision, City Council
shall adopt by resolution findings of fact in support of its decision and, if approved, the
written permit shall be attached to such resolution. To the extent a permit is deemed
approved because City Council has not made a decision, adoption of such a resolution is
not required.
(E) For administrative permits, decisions shall be issued pursuant to Division 2.18.
Administrative permit decisions may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission
for a de novo review and decision pursuant to Sections 2.2.12(C) and 2.18.3(L).
2-314 Issuance of Permit; Conditions.
(A) The Permit AuthorityCity Council may attach conditions to the permit pursuant to Section
6.3.92.2.9 and additional conditions to ensure that the purpose and requirements of these
Regulations are continuously met throughout the development, execution, operational life,
and any decommissioning period. A development agreement between the City and the
permittee may be required as a condition of approval.
(B) Issuance of a permit signifies only that a development plan has satisfied, or conditionally
satisfied, the applicable Regulations, and prior to commencing any development,
conditions of the permit, additional Land Use Development Code, Code of the City of Fort
Collins, other City requirements, or other state or federal requirements, may need to be
met.
(C) Subject to (D) below and Section 5-201, Tthe permit may be issued for an indefinite term
or for a specified period of time with such period depending upon the size and complexity
of the development plan.
(D) If the permittee fails to take substantial steps to initiate the permitted development plan
within twelve (12) months from the date of the approval of the permit or such other time
period specified in the permit, or if such steps have been taken but the applicant has failed
to complete the development with reasonable diligence, then the permit may be revoked or
suspended in accordance with Section 5-201. This time may be extended by the Director
for only one (1) additional year upon a showing of substantial progress.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
32
(E) All issued permits shall require that the permittee notify all fee owners of real property to
be used in completing the approved development plan that failure of the permittee to
comply with permit conditions may result in foreclosure of a City lien.
Division 2
Permits
Section 4
Common Review Standards
2-401 Review Standards for All Applications.
In addition to the review standards for specific activities listed at Divisions 3 and 4, all
applications under these Regulations, including proposed mitigation measures, shall be evaluated
against the following general standards, to the extent applicable or relevant to the development
plan, in the Permit AuthorityCity Council’s reasonable judgment. To the extent a permit
application may not comply with a particular standard, the applicant may demonstrate
compliance with such standard by proposing mitigation measures that sufficiently offset the
extent of noncompliance.
(A) All of the provisions of the permit application procedure have been complied withThe
applicant has obtained or will obtain all property rights, permits and approvals necessary for
the proposal, including surface, mineral and water rights.
(B) The health, welfare and safety of the community members citizens of the City will be protected
and served.
(C) The proposed activity is in conformance with the Fort Collins Comprehensive Plan and other
duly adopted plans of the City, or other applicable regional, state or federal land development
or water quality plan.
(D) The development plan is financially feasible. The determination of financial feasibility of the
development plan may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) The business plan submitted by the applicant.
(2) Relevant bond issue, loan and other financing approval or certifications including an
approved bond issue or bond counsel opinion.
(E) The development plan will not create an undue financial burden on existing or future residents
of the City.
(D) (F) The development plan is not subject to significant risk from natural or human caused
environmental hazards. The determination of risk from natural hazards to the development
plan may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Unstable slopes including landslides and rock slides.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
33
(2) Expansive or evaporative soils and risk of subsidence.
(3) Wildfire hazard areas.
(4) Floodplains.
(E) (G) The development plan will not have an significant adverse effect impact on the capability
of local governments affected by the development plan to provide local infrastructure and
services or exceed the capacity of service delivery systems. The determination of the effects
of the development plan on local government services may include but is not limited to the
following considerations:
(1) Current and projected capacity of roads, schools, infrastructure, drainage and/or
stormwater infrastructure, housing, and other local government facilities and services
necessary to accommodate development, and the impact of the development plan upon
the current and projected capacity.
(2) Changes caused by the development plan in the cost of providing education,
transportation networks, water treatment and wastewater treatment, stormwater
drainage, channel stabilization, bridges, emergency services, or other governmental
services or facilities.
(2) (3) Need for temporary roads or other infrastructure to access serve the development
plan for construction and maintenance.
(F) (H) The development plan will not have a significant adverse effectadversely impact on the
quality or quantity of recreational opportunities and experience. The determination of effects
impacts of the development plan on recreational opportunities and experience may include but
is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Changes to existing and projected visitor days.
(2) Changes in quality and quantity of fisheries.
(3) Changes in instream flows or reservoir levels.
(4) Changes in access to recreational resources.
(5) Changes to quality and quantity of hiking, biking, multi-use or horseback riding trails.
(6) Changes to regional open space.
(7) Changes to existing conservation easements.
(8) Changes to City parks, trails, natural areas, or recreation facilities.playgrounds,
community gardens, recreation fields or courts, picnic areas, and other City park
amenities.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
34
(G) (I) The development plan when completed will not significantly degrade adversely impact
existing visual quality. The determination of visual impaeffects of the development plan may
include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Visual changes to ground cover and vegetation, waterfalls and streams, or other natural
features.
(2) Interference with viewsheds and scenic vistas.
(3) Changes in landscape character types of unique land formations.
(4) Compatibility of structure size and color with scenic vistas and viewsheds.
(5) Changes to the visual character of regional open space.
(6) Changes to the visual character of existing conservation easements.
(7) Changes to the visual character of City parks, trails, natural areas, or recreation
facilities.
(H) (J) The development plan will not adversely impact significantly degrade air quality. The
determination of effects of the development plan on air quality may include but is not limited
to the following considerations:
(1) Changes in visibility and microclimates.
(2) Applicable air quality standards.
(3) Increased emissions of greenhouse gases.
(4) Emissions of air toxics.
(I) (K) The development plan will not significantly degradeadversely impact surface water
quality. The determination of effects impacts of the development plan on surface water quality
may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Changes to existing water quality, including patterns of water circulation, temperature,
conditions of the substrate, extent and persistence of suspended particulates and clarity,
odor, color or taste of water;
(2) Applicable narrative and numeric water quality standards.
(3) Changes in point and nonpoint source pollution loads.
(4) Increase in erosion.
(5) Changes in sediment loading to waterbodies.
(6) Changes in stream channel or shoreline stability.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
35
(7) Changes in stormwater runoff flows.
(8) Changes in trophic status or in eutrophication rates in lakes and reservoirs.
(9) Changes in the capacity or functioning of streams, lakes or reservoirs.
(10) Changes to the topography, natural drainage patterns, soil morphology and
productivity, soil erosion potential, and floodplains.
(11) Changes to stream sedimentation, geomorphology, and channel stability.
(12) Changes to lake and reservoir bank stability and sedimentation, and safety of existing
reservoirs.
(J) (L) The development plan will not significantly degradeadversely impact groundwater quality.
The determination of impactseffects of the development plan on groundwater quality may
include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Changes in aquifer recharge rates, groundwater levels and aquifer capacity including
seepage losses through aquifer boundaries and at aquifer-stream interfaces.
(2) Changes in capacity and function of wells within the impact area.
(3) Changes in quality of well water within the impacted area.
(K) (M) The development plan will not significantly degradeadversely impact wetlands and
riparian areas of any size regardless of jurisdictional status. In determining impacts to
wetlands and riparian areas, the following considerations shall include but not be limited to:
(1) Changes in the structure and function of wetlands.
(2) Changes to the filtering and pollutant uptake capacities of wetlands and riparian
areas.
(3) Changes to aerial extent of wetlands.
(4) Changes in species' characteristics and diversity.
(5) Transition from wetland to upland species.
(6) Changes in function and aerial extent of floodplains.
(L) (N) The development plan shall not significantly degradeadversely impact the quality of
terrestrial and aquatic animal life. In determining impacts to terrestrial and aquatic animal
life, the following considerations shall include but not be limited to:
(1) Changes that result in loss of oxygen for aquatic life.
(2) Changes in flushing flows.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
36
(3) Changes in species composition or density.
(4) Changes in number of threatened or endangered species.
(5) Changes to habitat and critical habitat, including calving grounds, mating grounds,
nesting grounds, summer or winter range, migration routes, or any other habitat
features necessary for the protection and propagation of any terrestrial animals.
(6) Changes to habitat and critical habitat, including stream bed and banks, spawning
grounds, riffle and side pool areas, flushing flows, nutrient accumulation and cycling,
water temperature, depth and circulation, stratification and any other conditions
necessary for the protection and propagation of aquatic species.
(7) Changes to the aquatic and terrestrial food webs.
(M) (O) The development plan shall not significantly degradeadversely impact the quality of
terrestrial and aquatic plant life. In determining impacts to terrestrial and aquatic animal life,
the following considerations shall include but not be limited to:
a. Changes to habitat of threatened or endangered plant species.
b. Changes to the structure and function of vegetation, including species
composition, diversity, biomass, and productivity.
c. Changes in advancement or succession of desirable and less desirable species,
including noxious weeds.
d. Changes in threatened or endangered species.
(N) (P) The development plan will not significantly degrade oradversely impact natural habitats
and features as defined in Land DevelopmentUse Code Section 5.6.13.4.1.
(O) (Q) The development plan will not adversely impact historic resources.
(P) The development plan will not adversely impact significant trees as defined in Land
Development Code Section 5.10.1.
(Q) The development plan will not significantly deteriorate adversely impact soils and geologic
conditions. The determination of effects impacts of the development plan on soils and
geologic conditions may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Loss of topsoil due to wind or water forces.
(2) Changes in soil erodibility.
(3) Physical or chemical soil deterioration.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
37
(4) Compacting, sealing and crusting.
(R) The development plan will not cause a nuisance. The determination of nuisance impactseffects
of the development plan may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
increase in odors, dust, fumes, glare, heat, noise, vibration or artificial light.
(S) The development plan will not result in unreasonable risk of releases of, or exposures to,
hazardous materials or regulated substances. The determination of the risk of release of, or
increased exposures to, hazardous materials or regulated substances caused by the
development plan may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Plans for compliance with federal and state handling, storage, disposal, and
transportation requirements.
(2) Use of waste minimization techniques.
(3) Adequacy of spill and leak prevention and response plans.
(T) For applications requiring an evaluation of alternatives, the proposed development plan must,
to the extent reasonably feasible, be the least environmentally impactful alternative among
the alternatives analyzed.
(T) The development plan will not have negative impacts that fall disproportionately on
disproportionately impacted communities within the City considering, for example, the
distribution of impacts to the following:
a. Air quality.
b. Water quality.
c. Soil contamination.
d. Waste management.
e. Hazardous materials.
f. Access to parks, natural areas, trail and other recreational or natural amenities.
g. Nuisances.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
38
Division 3
Regulations for Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic
Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Such Systems
Section 1 General Provisions
3-101 Applicability
3-102 Purpose and Intent Designation of Site Selection and Construction of Major New
Domestic Water and Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Such Systems
Section 2 Specific Review Standards
3-201 Specific Review Standards for Major New Domestic Water or Sewage Treatment
Systems or Major Extensions
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
39
Division 3
Regulations for Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic
Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Such Systems
Section 1
General Provisions
3-101 Applicability.
These Regulations shall apply to the site selection and construction of all major new domestic
water and sewage treatment systems, and major extensions of such systems, wholly or partially
within the municipal boundaries of the City.
3-102 Purpose and Intent.
The specific purpose and intent of this Division 3 are:
(A) To ensure that new domestic water and sewage treatment systems and major extensions of
such systems are constructed in areas which will result in the proper utilization of existing
treatment plants and the orderly development of domestic water and sewage treatment
systems within the City;
(B) To ensure that site selection and construction of major new domestic water and sewage
treatment systems and major extensions of such systems are conducted in such a manner
as to minimizeavoid or fully mitigate environmental impacts associated with such
development;
(C) To ensure that site selection and construction of major new domestic water and sewage
treatment systems and major extensions of such systems are planned and developed in a
manner so as not to impose an undue economic burden on existing or proposed
communities or ratepayers within the City;
(D) To ensure that urban development, population densities, and site layout and design of
water, wastewater, storm water and sanitation systems shall be accomplished in a manner
that will prevent the pollution of aquifer recharge areas;
(D) (E) To ensure that the off-site adverse impacts of new domestic water and sewage treatment
systems are effectively avoided or fully mitigated; and
(E) (F) To ensure that the surface and groundwater resources of the City are protected from
any adverse impact of the development of major water and sewage treatment systems and
major extensions of such systems.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
40
Division 3
Regulations for Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic
Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Such Systems
Section 2
Specific Review Standards
3-201 Specific Review Standards for Major New Domestic Water or Sewage Treatment
Systems or Major Extensions.
A permit application for the site selection and construction of a major new domestic water or
sewage treatment system or major extension of such system shall be approved with or without
conditions only if the development plan complies with the review standards in Section 2-401 and
the below standards, to the extent applicable or relevant. To the extent a permit application may
not comply with a particular standard, the applicant may demonstrate compliance with such
standard by proposing mitigation measures that sufficiently offset the extent of noncompliance. If
the Permit Authority finds the development plan does not comply with all applicable standards,
the permit shall be denied or, in the discretion of the Permit Authority, may be approved with
conditions which if fulfilled, would bring the development plan into compliance with all applicable
standards. The Permit Authority may also impose additional conditions pursuant to Section 2-314.
The specific review standards are:
(A) New domestic water and sewage treatment systems shall be constructed in areas which will
result in the proper use of existing treatment plants and the orderly development of
domestic water and sewage treatment systems within the City;
(B) Adequate water supplies, as determined by the Colorado Department of Health, are
available for efficient operational needs;
(B) (C) Existing domestic water treatment systems servicing the area must be at or near
operational capacity as determined by the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment;
(C) (D) Existing domestic sewage treatment facilities servicing the area must be at a level
requiring expansion as determined by the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environmentor greater than eighty percent (80%) of operational capacity;
(D) (E) The scope and nature of the proposed development will not compete with existing water
and sewage services or create duplicative services;
(F) Age of existing water and sewage systems, operational efficiency, state of repair or level
of treatment is such that replacement is warranted;
(G) Area and community development and population trends demonstrate clearly a need for
such development;
(H) Existing facilities cannot be upgraded or expanded to meet waste discharge permit
conditions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission;
(I) Easements can be obtained for any associated transmission line or interceptor line that will
serve existing and proposed needs;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
41
(J) The benefits of the proposed development plan outweigh the losses of any natural resources
or agricultural lands rendered unavailable of less productive as a result of the proposed
development;
(I) (K) The proposed development plan, if for a domestic water system, is capable of providing
water meeting the requirements of the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment and other state and federal water quality requirements.; and
(L) All jurisdictions receiving water diverted from within City limits must demonstrate adopted
policies, regulations and programs related to water conservation are sufficient to reduce lower
per capita water use over time. Such policies, regulations and programs may include but not
be limited to:
(1) Green plumbing code.
(2) Indoor efficiency standards.
(3) Reuse of water.
(4) Smart meters.
(5) Submetering multifamily units.
(6) Incentive and rebate programs to reduce water use.
(7) Demand-based tap fees.
(8) Xeriscape/turf limitations code requirements.
(9) Irrigation efficiency code requirements.
(10) Post-occupancy violations.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
42
Division 4
Site Selection of Arterial Highways
and Interchanges and Collector Highways
Section 1 General Provisions
4-101 Applicability
4-102 Purpose and Intent
Section 2 Specific Standards
4-201 Specific Review Standards for Arterial Highway, Interchange or Collector Highway
Projects
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
43
Division 4
Site Selection of Arterial Highways
and Interchanges and Collector Highways
Section 1
General Provisions
4-101 Applicability.
This Division shall apply to the site selection of all arterial highways and interchanges and
collector highways wholly or partially within the municipal boundaries of the City.
4-102 Purpose and Intent.
The specific purpose and intent of this Division are:
(A) To facilitate the local administration of site selection of arterial highways and interchanges
and collector highways by establishing requirements which must be met before a site may
be selected;
(A) (B) To ensure that community traffic needs are met;
(B) (C)To provide for the continuation of desirable community traffic circulation patterns by
all modes;
(C) (D)To discourage expansion of demand for government services beyond the reasonable
capacity of the community or region to provide such services as determined by the City;
(D) (E)To prevent direct conflicts with local, regional and state master plans;
(E) (F)To ensure that highway and interchange development is compatible with surrounding
land uses;
(F) (G)To encourage the coordination of highway planning with community and development
plans;
(G) (H)To discourage traffic hazards and congestion;
(H) (I)To minimize sources of traffic noise, air and water pollution; and
(I) (J)To protect scenic, natural, historical and archeologicalcultural resources from
destruction.; and
(J) To ensure that site selection of arterial highways, interchanges and collector highways
occurs so that community land use, economic development, and traffic needs are met,
desirable community patterns are not disrupted, historic, natural and archeological values
are preserved, and such site selection conforms to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, as well
as regional and state master plans.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
44
Division 4
Site Selection of Arterial Highways
and Interchanges and Collector Highways
Section 2
Specific Standards
4-201 Specific Review Standards for Arterial Highway, Interchange or Collector Highway
Projects.
A permit for the site selection of an arterial highway, interchange or collector highway shall be
approved with or without conditions only if the proposed development plan complies with the
review standards in Section 2-401 and the below standards, to the extent applicable or relevant. To
the extent a permit application may not comply with a particular standard, the applicant may
demonstrate compliance with such standard by proposing mitigation measures that sufficiently
offset the extent of noncompliance. If the Permit Authority finds the development plan does not
comply with all applicable standards, the permit shall be denied or, in the discretion of the Permit
Authority, may be approved with conditions which if fulfilled, would bring the development plan
into compliance with all applicable standards. The Permit Authority may also impose additional
conditions pursuant to Section 2-314. The specific review standards are:
(A) The proposed arterial highway, interchange or collector highway will be located so that
community traffic needs are met;
(B) The closure of frontage roads in association with arterial highways, interchanges and
collector highways occurs in a coordinated manner with the City and do not cause traffic
impacts.
(A) (C)The proposed arterial highway, interchange or collector highway will be located so that
natural habitats and features, historic resources, and City natural areas and parks and other
local government facilities and resources are protected to the maximum extent feasible;
(B) (D)The proposed arterial highway or interchange or collector highway will be located only
in a corridor for which a clear and reasonable local and regional need has been
demonstrated;
(C) (E)The location and access limitations for the arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not isolate community neighborhoods from and, where practicable, will
enhance access from community neighborhoods to public facilities including schools,
military installations, hospitals, mass transit, pedestrian walkways and bikeways,
recreational facilities and areas, community centers, government and social services
provider offices and facilities, natural areas, and open spaces;
(D) (F)The construction of the arterial highway and interchange or collector highway shall be
phased to minimize interference with traffic movement;
(E) (G)The location and access limitations for the arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not restrict access via to other roadways, mass transit facilities, pedestrian
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
45
walkways and bikeways, local commercial services, residential developments, business
and employment centers, and public facilities including schools, hospitals, recreational
facilities and areas, natural areas, and open spaces;
(F) (H)Alternative modes of transportation will be incorporated into the proposal to the extent
feasible;
(G) (I)If park-and-ride facilities are utilized, they shall be located in areas designated approved
by the City;
(H) (J)The location of the proposed new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not impede the delivery of essential community services and goods;
(I) (K)Desirable local and regional community land use patterns will not be disrupted by the
location of the proposed new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway;
(J) (L)The location and access limitations for the arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not create safety hazards to motorists, pedestrians or bicyclists by causing or
contributing to overuse, improper use or congestion, or cause unnecessary diversion of
regional traffic onto other City roadways or inappropriate or inadequate connections to
pedestrian and bicycle routes;
(K) (M)The proposed location of the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or
collector highway will be located so as to complement the efficient extension of planned
public services, utilities and development in general, both regionally and within the City;
(L) (N)The site selection for the proposed location of the new or expanded arterial highway,
interchange or collector highway will adhere to the plan, process, procedure and
requirements of the State and the Federal Highway Administration, and such construction,
expansion or modification will be included in the then-current Larimer-Weld Council of
Governments Regional Transportation Plan, Central Front Range Plan (CFR), the Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) Statewide Transportation Plan and the Statewide
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the Fort Collins Major Transportation
Corridor Planlocal and regional transportation plans;
(M) (O) The proposed location of the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or
collector highway will not result in the destruction, impairment or significant alteration of
sensitive, key commercial, tourist or visitor areas or districts within the City;
(N) (P)The proposed location of the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not contribute to a negative economic impact to residential, commercial,
tourist or visitor areas or districts within the City;
(O) (Q)To the extent tolling is proposed, the use or level of tolling is appropriate in light of
existing toll levels, if any, and any prior or projected public infrastructure investment;
(P) (R)The proposed highways can be integrated into the regional transportation network;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
46
(Q) (S)The new or expandedproposed arterial highway, or interchange or collector highway
will not have a significant adverse impact on prime or unique farmland as defined by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service;
(T) Land acquisitions and/or the relocation of uses and improvements will follow the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act;
(R) The benefits of the development plan, including expected development in the regional and
local surroundings of the development site, will outweigh the social, fiscal, and
environmental impact and the loss of any scenic, historical, archeological, or natural
resources rendered unavailable as a result of the location of the development plan;
(S) The proposed location of the arterial highway, interchange or collector highway will not
result in the destruction, impairment or significant alteration of historic properties or
districts within the City and will not impair the function or historic integrity of a historic
resource of statewide importance;
(R) (W)The proposed location and design of the arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway does not cause lighting impacts from headlights or streetlights to nearby
residential neighborhoods or other developments or night sky objectives and plans;
(S) (X)Noise levels caused by the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will follow federal noise regulations; and
(T) (Y)Vertical sStructures and buildings will match the character of the cCity through
materials and design.
(U) (Z)The local air quality impacts of the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or
collector highway shall support attainment of federal and state ambient air quality
standards and shall not increase risks to human health and the environment posed by air
pollutants.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
47
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 1 Financial Security
5-101 Financial Security
Section 2 Suspension or Revocation of Permits
5-201 Suspension or Revocation of Permits
Section 3 Review, Renewal, Amendment, Transfer
5-301 Annual Review; Progress Reports
5-302 Permit Renewal
5-303 Permit Amendment
5-304 TechnicalMinor Revision Not Constituting a Material Changeor Modification
5-305 Transfer of Permits
Section 4 Enforcement
5-401 Enforcement
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
48
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 1
Financial Security
5-101 Financial Security.
(A) Before any development occurs pursuant to an approved permit issued pursuant to these
Regulations, the applicant shall provide the City with a guarantee of financial security
deemed adequate by the Director to accomplish the purposes of this Section, in a form
approved by the City Attorney and payable to the City of Fort Collins. Parties signatory to
the financial guarantee shall include the permittee and all responsible parties as defined at
Section 1-110.
(B) The purpose of the financial guarantee is to ensure that the permittee shall faithfully
perform all requirements of the permit and the Director shall determine the amount of the
financial guarantee in consideration of the following standards, to the extent applicable or
relevant to the approved development plan:
(1) The estimated cost of returning the site of the permitted development plan to its original
condition or to a condition acceptable in accordance with standards adopted by the City
for the matter of state interest for which the permit is being granted;
(2) The estimated cost of implementing and successfully maintaining any revegetation
required by the permit.
(3) The estimated cost of completing the permitted development plan; and
(4) The estimated cost of complying with any permit conditions, including mitigation,
monitoring, reporting, and City inspections to ensure compliance with the terms of the
permit.
(C) Estimated cost shall be based on the applicant’s submitted cost estimate. The Director shall
consider the duration of the development plan and compute a reasonable projection of
increases due to inflation over the entire life of the development plan. The Director may
require, as a condition of the permit, that the financial security shall be adjusted upon
receipt of bids.
(D) The financial guarantee may be released in whole or in part with the approval of the
Director only when:
(1) The permit has been surrendered to the Director before commencement of any physical
activity on the site of the approved development plan;
(2) The approved development plan has been abandoned and the site thereof has been
returned to its original condition or to a condition acceptable to the Director in
accordance with standards adopted by the Permit Authority for the matter of state
interest for which the permit is being granted;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
49
(3) The approved development plan has been satisfactorily completed; or
(4) Applicable guaranteed conditions have been satisfied.
(E) Any security may be cancelled by a surety only upon receipt of the Director’s written
consent which may be granted only when such cancellation will not detract from the
purposes of the security.
(F) If the license to do business in Colorado of any surety upon a security filed pursuant to
these Regulations is suspended or revoked by any State authority, then the permittee, within
sixty (60) days after receiving notice thereof, shall substitute a good and sufficient surety
licensed to do business in the State. Upon failure of the permittee to make substitution of
surety within the time allowed, the Permit AuthorityDirector shall suspend the permit until
proper substitution has been made.
(G) No security is acceptable if signed by or drawn on an institution for or in which the
permittee or any responsible party is an owner, shareholder, or investor other than simply
an account holder.
(H) The Director may determine at any time that a financial guarantee should be forfeited
because of any violation of the permit. The Director shall provide written notice of such
determination to the surety and the permittee of their right to written demand of the Director
within thirty (30) days of receiving written notice from the Director.
(1) If no demand is made within said period, then the Director shall order in writing that
the financial guarantee be forfeited and provide a copy of such order to the surety and
permittee.
(2) If a timely demand is received, the Director shall make good faith efforts to meet with
the permittee and surety within thirty (30) days after the receipt of such demand. At the
meeting the permittee and surety may present any information with respect to the
alleged violation for the Director’s consideration. At the conclusion of any meeting,
the Director shall either withdraw the notice of violation or order in writing that the
financial guarantee should be forfeited and provide a copy of such order to the surety
and permittee.
(I) The Director may require the recording of a lien in favor of the City on real property to be
used in completing the approved development plan and owned in fee by the permittee or
responsible parties in order to further guarantee permit compliance.
(I) (J) If the forfeiture results in inadequate revenue to cover the costs of accomplishing the
purposes of the financial guarantee, the City Attorney shall take such steps as deemed
proper to recover such costs, including imposing and foreclosingure aof the City lien on
real property and/or certifying the same to the County Treasurer for collection in the same
manner as real property taxes, pursuant to Sections 31-20-105 and 106, C.R.S.
(J) (K) The financial security under this Section may be waived, in the Director’s sole
discretion, if a proposed development plan is solely financed by state agencies, a political
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
50
subdivision of the state, or a special or enterprise fund that has established to the Director’s
satisfaction the availability of funds required to complete the proposed development plan.
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 2
Suspension or Revocation of Permits
5-201 Suspension or Revocation of Permits.
(A) If the Director has reason to believe that the permittee has violated any provision of theany
permit or the terms of any regulation for administration of the permit, and such violation
poses a danger to public health, safety, welfare, the environment or wildlife resources, the
health or safety of the public, the Director has the authority to order the immediate
suspension of all operations associated with implementing the approved development plan
and suspension of the permit until the danger has been eliminated. At such time as the
Director has determined the danger is eliminated and any violations of the permit or the
terms of any regulation for administration of the permit, the Director shall withdraw the
suspension. Should the danger be eliminated but violations of the permit still exist, the
Director shall suspend the permit for up to an additional one-hundred and eighty (180) days
pursuant to (B)(3) below.
(B) If the Director has reason to believe that the permittee has violated any provision of any
permit or the terms of any regulation for administration of the permit, and such violation
does not pose a danger to publicthe health, or safety, welfare, the environment or wildlife
resources, of the public, the Director may temporarily suspend the permit for an initial
period of up to thirty (30) days or until the violation is corrected, whichever occurs first.
(1) Before imposing such temporary suspension, the Director shall provide written notice
to the permittee of the specific violation and shall allow the permittee a period of at
least fifteen (15) days to correct the violation from the date notice was provided.
(2) If the permit holder does not agree that there is a violation, the permittee shall, within
fifteen (15) days of the date notice was provided, submit a written response to the
Director detailing why the temporary suspension should not occur. Upon receiving
such response, the Director shall within ten (10) days issue a written response either
withdrawing the notice of violation or imposing the temporary permit suspension. The
Director’s decision is not subject to appeal.
(3) Should a violation remain uncorrected after the initial period of temporary suspension
has elapsed, the Director shall extend in writing the period of temporary suspension for
up to an additional one-hundred and eighty (180) days or until the violation is corrected,
whichever occurs first. Notice of such extension shall be provided to the permittee and
the extended suspension may be appealed pursuant to Chapter 2, Article VI, of the Code
of the City of Fort Collins, however, pending such appeal hearing, the permit
suspension shall remain in effect.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
51
(C) Subsequent to any extended temporary suspension imposed under (B)(3) above, the
Director may permanently revoke the permit upon a written determination that the violation
for which the temporary suspension was premised remains uncorrected. The determination
shall be provided to the permittee and such revocation may be appealed pursuant to Chapter
2, Article VI, of the Code of the City of Fort Collins, however, pending the decision of
such appeal, the permitrevocation shall remain in effect.
(D) The Director may permanently revoke a permit upon a written determination that the
permittee has failed to take substantial steps to initiate the permitted development or
activity within twelve (12) months from the date of the issuance of the permit or within the
timeframe of any extensions granted, or, if such steps have been taken, the permittee has
failed to complete or pursue completion of the development or activity with reasonable
diligence. The determination shall be provided to the permittee and such revocation may
be appealed pursuant to Chapter 2, Article VI, of the Code of the City of Fort Collins,
however, pending such appeal hearing, the revocation shall remain in effect. The
permanent revocation of a permit does not bar the future submittal of a new permit
application for the same, or substantially the same, proposed development plan.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
52
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 3
Permit Review, Renewal, Amendment, Transfer
5-301 Annual Review; Progress Reports.
(A) Within thirty (30) days prior to each annual anniversary date of the granting of a permit,
the permittee shall submit a report detailing any and all activities conducted by the
permittee pursuant to the permit including, but not limited to, a satisfactory showing that
the permit has complied with all conditions of the permit and applicable regulations for
administration of the permit.
(B) Director shall review the report within thirty (30) days from the date of submittal thereof.
If the Director determines, based upon its review, that the permittee was likely to have
violated the provisions of the permit or applicable regulations, or both, the Director shall
make a good faith effort to meet with the permittee to discuss the matter. If the Director
determines after any meeting that the permittee has violated the provisions of the permit or
applicable regulations, or both, the Director may suspend and/or revoke the permit in
accordance with Section 5-201.
(C) Upon fulfillment of all permit conditions, this annual review requirement may be waived
by the Director.
(D) At any time, the Director may require the permittee to submit an interim progress report.
5-302 Permit Renewal.
Permits issued under these Regulations may be renewed following the same procedure for approval
of new permits except the renewal process shall not include the Director’s FONSIFONAI review
pursuant to Section 2-303. The Director may impose additional conditions at the time of renewal
if necessary to ensure that the approved development plan will comply with these Regulations.
5-303 Permit Amendment.
The Director shall require a permit amendment for any material change, as determined by the
Director, in the construction, use, or operation of an approved development plan from the terms
and conditions of an approved permit. The amendment shall be processed in accordance with and
subject to the same procedures and requirements set forth herein for a full permit or administrative
permit except that the Director’s FONSIFONAI review pursuant to Section 2-3043 shall not occur.
5-304 Technical Minor Revision or ModificationNot Constituting a Material Change.
The permittee may apply to the Director for a technical minor revisions or modification to an
issued permit to correct errors or make other modificationchanges to conform the permit to actual
conditions to the extent such minor revision or modification is not a material change to the permit
as determined by the Director. The Director is granted discretion to approve such minor revisions
or modification or to determine that a permit amendment is required pursuant to Section 5-303. In
reviewing a requested minor revision or revisions, the Director shall consider the request in the
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
53
context of previously approved minor revisions to determine whether in the aggregate, the
requested minor revision or revisions constitute a material change.
5-305 Transfer of Permits.
A permit may be transferred only upon the Director’s written consent. The Director must ensure
in approving any transfer that the proposed transferee can and will comply with all the
requirements, terms, and conditions contained in the permit and these regulations; that such
requirements, terms, and conditions remain sufficient to protect the health, welfare, and safety of
the public; and that an adequate guarantee of financial security can be made.
5-306 Inspection.
The Director in their sole discretion is empowered to cause the inspection of any development,
operation, or decommissioning activities related to a permit, including on or off-site mitigation
activities, to ensure compliance with such permit and applicable laws and regulations. The
permittee shall provide reasonable access to property for which the permittee has the authority to
do so and shall make good faith efforts to coordinate access for other property. To the extent
such inspection is ongoing or otherwise subject to advance planning, the Director shall consult
with the permittee to coordinate inspection to minimize potential disruptions. The Director may
retain a third-party consultant to conduct such inspections, including a consultant with
specialized knowledge or training, and the cost of all such inspections shall be the responsibility
of the permittee. The inspections provided for under this Section are in addition to Section
6.26.3.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
54
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 4
Enforcement
5-401 Enforcement.
Any person engaging in development in a designated area of a state interest or conducting a
designated activity of state interest who does not first obtain a permit pursuant to these Regulations,
who does not comply with permit requirements, or who acts outside the authority of the permit, is
in violation of this Land DevelopmentUse Code and the City may take enforcement action
pursuant to Division 6.262.14 and may additionally take any other action available under these
Regulations and civil or criminal law, including seeking injunctive relief, or revoking or
suspending any permit issued pursuant to these Regulations or any permit issued pursuant to the
Land DevelopmentUse Code or the Code of the City of Fort Collins. These Regulations are not
intended to create third party rights of enforcement.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
1
ARTICLE _____
CITY OF FORT COLLINS COLORADO
GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS FOR
AREAS AND ACTIVITIES OF STATE INTEREST
CONTENTS
Division 1: General Provisions, Designation, and Exemptions
Division 2: Permits
Division 3: Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic Water and Sewage
Treatment Systems and Major Extensions of such Systems
Division 4: Site Selection of Arterial Highways and Interchanges and Collector Highways
Division 5: Permit Hearing Procedures, Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration,
Enforcement
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
2
Division 1
General Provisions, Designation, and Exemptions
Section 1 Introductory and General Provisions
1-101 Title and Citation
1-102 Purpose and Findings; Scope
1-103 Authority
1-104 Applicability
1-105 Permit Required; Allowed Use Not Required; Stay On Issuance of Easements and Other
Permits
1-106 Relationship of Regulations to other City, State and Federal Requirements
1-107 Maps
1-108 Modification of Standards, Variances, and Appeal from Administrative Decisions
to the Land Use Review Commission Not Applicable
1-109 Severability
1-110 Definitions
Section 2 Procedure for Designation of Matters of State Interest
1-201 City Council to Make Designations
1-202 Public Hearing Required
1-203 Notice of Public Hearing; Publication
1-204 Matters to be Considered at Designation Hearing
1-205 Record of Designation Proceeding
1-206 Adoption of Designation and Regulations
1-207 Effect of Notice of Designation – Moratorium until Final Determination
1-208 Mapping Disputes
Section 3 Designated Activities of State Interest
1-301 Designated Areas and Activities of State Interest
Section 4 Exemptions
1-401 Exemptions
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
3
DIVISION 1
General Provisions, Designation, and Exemptions
Section 1
Introductory and General Provisions
1-101 Title and Citation
The various regulations constituting Divisions 1 through 5 of Article __ are titled and may be cited
as the “Guidelines and Regulations for Areas and Activities of State Interest of the City of Fort
Collins,” or “Regulations.”
1-102 Purpose and Findings
(A) Purpose. The general purpose of these Regulations is to facilitate identification,
designation, and administration of matters of state interest consistent with the statutory
requirements and criteria set forth in Section 24-65.1-101, et seq., C.R.S., The specific
purposes are to:
(1) Protect public health, safety, welfare, the environment, and historic and wildlife
resources;
(2) Implement the vision and policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan;
(3) Ensure that infrastructure, growth and development in the City occur in a planned and
coordinated manner;
(4) Protect natural, historic, and cultural resources; protect and enhance natural habitats
and features of significant ecological value as defined in Section 5.6.13.4.1; protect air
and water quality,; reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance adaptation to climate
change;
(5) Promote safe, efficient, and economic use of public resources in developing and
providing community and regional infrastructure, facilities, and services;
(6) Regulate land use on the basis of environmental, social and financial, social and
environmental impacts of proposed development on the community and surrounding
areas; and
(7) Ensure City participation in the review and approval of development plans that pass
through and impact City residents, businesses, neighborhoods, property owners,
resources and other assetsresources.
(B) Findings. The City Council of the City of Fort Collins finds that:
(1) The notice and public hearing requirements of Section 24-65.1-404, C.R.S., have been
followed in adopting these Regulations;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
4
(2) These Regulations are necessary because of the intensity of current and foreseeable
development pressures on and within the City;
(3) These Regulations are necessary to protect the public health, safety, welfare, the
environment, and cultural and wildlife resources;
(4) These Regulations apply to the entire area within the incorporated municipal
boundaries of the City; and
(5) These Regulations interpret and apply to any regulations adopted for specific areas of
state interest and specific activities of state interest which have been or may be
designated by the City Council.
1-103 Authority.
These Regulations are authorized by, inter alia, Fort Collins City Charter Article I, Section 4,
Colorado Constitution Article XX, Section 24-65.1-101, et seq., C.R.S.; Section 30-23-101, et
seq., and Section 29-20-101, et seq., C.R.S.
1-104 Applicability.
These Regulations shall apply to all proceedings and decisions concerning identification,
designation, and regulation of any development in any area of state interest or any activity of state
interest that has been or may hereafter be designated by the City Council.
(A) To the extent a development plan could be reviewed under these Regulations and also as a
Site Plan Advisory Review, Overall Development Plan, Project Development Plan, Final
Plan, Basic Development Review, or Minor or Major Amendment, or other site-specific
development plan, such development plan shall only be reviewed under these Regulations
unless the Director issues a FONAISI pursuant to Section 2-3042-303 or an exemption as
set forth in Section 1-401 applies, in which case the development plan shall instead be
reviewed under the other applicable review process.
(B) Development plans that have completed Site Plan Advisory Review pursuant to the Land
Use Code prior to the effective date of these Regulations shall be subject to these
Regulations unless a FONSIFONAI is issued or an exemption applies.
(C) City Council has designated as an activity of state interest subject to these Regulations, the
Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic Water and Sewage Treatment
Systems and the Major Extension of Existing Domestic Water and Sewage Treatment
Systems. Definitions for major new domestic water systems and major new sewage
treatment systems and major extensions of each are set forth in Section 1-110.
(D) City Council has also designated as an activity of state interest subject to these Regulations,
the Site Selection of Arterial Highways and Interchanges and Collector Highways.
Definitions for determining which development plans for arterial highways, interchanges
and collector highways are subject to these Regulations are set forth in Section 1-110.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
5
1-105 Permit Required; Allowed Use Not Required; Stay On Issuance of Easements and
Other Permits
(A) Permit Required.
Other than as stated in Sections 1-104 and 1-401, no person may conduct a designated
activity of state interest or develop in a designated area of state interest within the City
without first obtaining an administrative permit, full permit, or a permit amendment under
these Regulations.
(B) Allowed Use in Zone District Not Required.
A permit pursuant to these Regulations may be issued for a development plan that is to be
located in one or more zone districts regardless of whether the zone district or districts list
the use proposed by the development plan as an allowed use or otherwise prohibit such
use.
(C) Stay on Issuance of Easements and Other Permits
No easements on City-owned real property and no permits issued by the City other than
under these Regulations, including but not limited to flood plain and right-of-way
encroachment permits, shall be granted for any development plan subject to these
Regulations without such development plan having first obtained a permit pursuant to these
Regulations or as otherwise allowed under these Regulations.
1-106 Relationship of Regulations to Other City, State and Federal Requirements.
(A) Whenever these Regulations are found to be inconsistent with any other resolution,
ordinance, code, regulation, or other enactment of the City, the enactment imposingLand
Development Code provision, the more restrictive stringent standards or requirements shall
control.
(B) In the event these Regulations are found to be less stringent than the statutory criteria for
administration of matters of state interest set forth in Section 24-65.1-202, C.R.S., the
statutory criteria shall control.
(C) In the event these Regulations are found to be more stringent than the statutory criteria for
administration of matter of state interest set forth in Sections 24-65.1-202 and 24-65.1-204,
C.R.S., these Regulations shall control pursuant to the authority of Section 24-65.1-402
(3), C.R.S.
(D) Unless otherwise specified in these Regulations, Tthese Regulations are intended to be
applied in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other City regulations or policies, including,
without limitation, the Land Use Development Code, as amended, Natural Areas Easement
Policy, and regulations regarding flood plain and encroachment permits as set forth in the
Code of the City of Fort Collins.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
6
(E) Permit requirements included in these Regulations shall be in addition to and in
conformance with all applicable local, state, and federal water quality and air quality, and
environmental laws, rules, and regulations.
(F) Review or approval of a development plan by a federal or state or local agency does not
substitute for a permit under these Regulations. Any applicant for a permit under these
Regulations that is also subject to the regulations of other agencies may request in writing
that the City application and review process be coordinated with that of the other agency
or agencies. If practicable, and in its their discretion, the Director may attempt to eliminate
redundant application submittal requests and may coordinate City review of the application
with that of other agencies as appropriate.
(G) These Regulations shall not be construed as modifying or amending existing laws or court
decrees with respect to the determination and administration of water rights.
1-107 Maps.
(A) Each map referred to in designations and regulations for any particular matter of state
interest adopted by the City Council is deemed adopted therein as if set out in full.
(B) Maps referred to in any such designations and regulations shall be available for inspection
in the offices of the Community Development and Neighborhood Services Department.
1-108 Modification of Standards, Variances, and Appeal from Administrative Decisions to
the Land Use Review Commission Not Applicable.
The following Land DevelopmentUse Code Divisions are not applicable to these Regulations:
(A) Division 26.8-- Modification of Standards;
(B) Division 6.142.10 – Variances; and
(C) Division 6.182.11 – Appeal from Administrative Decisions to the Land Use Review
Commission
1-109 Severability.
If any division, section, clause, provision, or portion of these Regulations should be found to be
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall not
be affected thereby.
1-110 Definitions.
The words and terms used in these Regulations shall have the meanings set forth below or in
Article 75 subject to Section 6.24.91.4.9 regarding the rules of construction for text:
Adequate security shall mean such funds or funding commitments, whether in the form of cash,
negotiable securities, letters of credit, bonds or other instruments or guarantees, as are deemed
sufficient, in the Director’s discretion, and in a form approved by the City Attorney, to guarantee
performance of the act, promise, permit condition or obligation to which it pertains.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
7
Administrative permit shall mean a permit under these Regulations that is subject to Director
review and decision pursuant to the Land Use Code basic development review procedure set forth
in Divisions 2.18 and 2.20 and these Regulations.Adverse impact shall mean the direct or indirect
negative effect or consequence resulting from development. Adverse impact shall refer to the
negative physical, environmental, economic, visual, auditory, or social consequences or effects
that may or may not be avoidable or fully mitigable. Adverse impacts may include reasonably
foreseeable effects or consequences caused by the development that may occur later in time or be
cumulative in nature.
Aquifer recharge area shall mean any area where surface water may infiltrate to a water-bearing
stratum of permeable rock, sand or gravel. This definition also applies to wells used for disposal
of wastewater or toxic pollutants.
Arterial highway shall mean any limited access highway that is part of the federal-aid interstate
system, any limited access highway constructed under the supervision of the Colorado Department
of Transportation, or any private toll road constructed or operated under the authority of a private
toll road company. Arterial highway does not include a city street or local service road or a county
road designed for local service and constructed under the supervision of local government.
Collector highway shall mean a major thoroughfare serving as a corridor or link between
municipalities, unincorporated population centers or recreation areas, or industrial centers and
constructed under guidelines and standards established by, or under the supervision of, the
Colorado Department of Transportation. Collector highway does not include a city street or local
service road or a county road designed for local service and constructed under the supervision of
local government.
Collector sewer shall mean a network of pipes and conduits through which sewage flows to an
interceptor main and/or a sewage treatment plant.
Designation shall mean only that legal procedure specified by Section 24-65.1-401, et seq., C.R.S.,
and carried out by the City Council.
Disproportionately Impacted Community or DIC shall mean a community that is in a census block
group where the proportion of households that are low income, that identify as minority, or that
are housing cost-burdened is greater than 40% as such terms are defined in Section 24-4-
109(2)(b)(II), C.R.S., and as amended.
Distribution system shall mean a network of pipes and conduits through which water is piped for
human consumption or a network of pipes and conduits through which water is piped in exchange
or trade for human consumption.
Domestic water and sewage treatment system shall mean a wastewater treatment facility, water
distribution system, or water treatment facility, as defined in Section 25-9-102(5), (6) and (7),
C.R.S., and any system of pipes, structures and facilities through which wastewater is collected
for treatment.
FONASI shall mean a finding of no significantnegligible adverse impact pursuant to Section 2-
3043.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
8
Full permit shall mean a permit under these Regulations that is subject to City Council review and
decision pursuant to the Land Use Code areas and activities of state interest procedure set forth in
Division 2.20 and these Regulations.
Highways shall mean state and federal highways.
Historic resource shall have the meaning set forth in Chapter 14 of the Code of the City of Fort
Collins.
Historic resource impact area shall mean an area within which development activities may have
significant impacts upon historic resources of statewide or City importance.
Impact shall mean the direct or indirect effect or consequence resulting from development. The
term shall include physical, environmental, economic, visual, auditory, or social consequences or
effects.
Impact area shall mean the geographic areas, including the development site, in which any adverse
impacts are likely to be caused by the development.
Interceptor mainline shall mean a pipeline that receives wastewater flows from collector sewers
to a wastewater treatment facility or to another interceptor line or meeting other requirements of
the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to be classified as an interceptor.
Interchange shall mean the intersection of two or more highways, roads or streets, at least one of
which is an arterial highway or toll road where there is direct access to and from the arterial
highway or toll road.
Major extension of an existing wastewater treatment system shall mean any modification of an
existing wastewater treatment plant or lift station that will result in a material change, or any
extension or upgrade of existing interceptor lines provided such extension or upgrade meets the
Land Use Code definition of the term development. Major extensions shall not include wastewater
mains or service lines.
Major extension of an existing domestic water treatment system shall mean the expansion of an
existing domestic water treatment plant or capacity for storage that will result in a material change,
or the extension or upgrade of existing transmission lines or new pump station, provided the
extension or upgrade meets the Land Use Code definition of the term development. Major
extensions shall not include service lines or distribution lines.
Major new domestic wastewater treatmentsewage system shall mean:
1. Aa new wastewater treatment plant; or
2. A new lift station, interceptor mainlines or collector sewer andused lift station(s) for the
purposes of transporting and treating wastewater.
Major new domestic water system shall mean:
1. Aa system of wells, water diversions, transmission mains, distribution mains,
ditches, structures, and facilities, including water reservoirs, water storage tanks, water
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
9
treatment plants or impoundments and their associated structures, through which a water
supply is obtained, stored, and sold or distributed for domestic uses; or
2. Aa system of wells, water diversions, transmission mainslines, distribution mains,
ditches, structures, and facilities, including water reservoirs, water storage tanks, water
treatment plants or impoundments and their associated structures, through which a water
supply is obtained that will be used directly or by trade, substitution, augmentation, or
exchange for water that will be used for human consumption or household use.
In determining whether a proposed development plan is a major new domestic water supply
system, the Director may consider water rights decrees, pending water rights applications,
intergovernmental agreements, treaties, water supply contracts and any other evidence of the
ultimate use of the water for domestic, human consumption or household use. In order to be a
major new domestic water system, such system must meet the Land Use Code definition of
development. Major new domestic water system shall not include service lines or distribution lines.
Major extension of an existing domestic water treatment system shall mean the expansion of an
existing domestic water treatment plant or capacity for storage that will result in a material change,
or the extension or upgrade of existing transmission mains, distribution mains, or new pump
stations that will result in a material change.
Major extension of an existing sewage treatment system shall mean any modification of an existing
wastewater treatment plant or lift station that will result in a material change, or any extension or
upgrade of existing interceptor main or collector sewer that will result in a material change.
Material change shall mean any change in an approved development plan as approved under these
Regulations which significantly changes the scale, magnitude, or nature of the approved
development plan or the adverse impacts considered by the Permit Authority in approval of the
original permit; or in the case of existing development not previously issued a permit or a proposed
development plan for which a FONAI was issued, a structural modification, change of use, change
of operation, change of user, or change of location that significantly changes the scale, magnitude,
or nature or location of (1) the existing development or development plan for which a FONAI was
issued, or (2)and its the associated adverse impacts.
Matter of state interest shall mean an area of state interest or an activity of state interest or both.
Mitigation shall mean avoiding an impact; minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude
of the action or its implementation; rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring
the impact area, facility or service; or compensation for the impact by replacing or providing for
the replacement of biological or physical conditions, services or facilities.
Permit shall mean an administrative or fulla permit issued under these Regulations to conduct an
activity of state interest or to engage in development in an area of state interest, or both. See also
the defined terms administrative permit and full permit.
Permit Authority shall mean, the City Council or with respect to matters delegated by these
Regulations, the Director and the Planning and Zoning Commission, as established and further
described in Section 2-101. Director for a FONSI, level of permit review, and administrative
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
10
permits, the Planning and Zoning Commission for appeals of Director FONSI, level of permit
review, and administrative permit decisions and for recommendations to City Council regarding
full permits, and the City Council for full permits and appeals of Planning and Zoning Commission
decisions for appeals of Director FONSI, level of permit review, and administrative permit
decisions.
Responsible party shall, for the purpose of providing required financial security, mean the person
or persons responsible for construction or operation of a permitted development in an area of state
interest, or a permitted activity of state interest under these Regulations. This term includes all
persons responsible for compliance with any permit condition.
Significant shall mean deserving to be considered important, notable, and not trifling.
Site selection of arterial highways and interchanges and collector highways shall mean the
determination of a specific corridor or facility location which is made at the conclusion of the
corridor location studies in which:
1. Cconstruction of an arterial highway, interchange, or collector highway is
proposed; or
2. Eexpansion or modification of an existing arterial highway, interchange or
collector highway is proposed.
, provided that site selection or expansion of highways or interchanges meets
the definition of development in the Land Use Code. This shall also mean the
closure of frontage roads in association with arterial highways, interchanges,
and collector highways.
Source development area shall mean the geographic area or region wholly or partially within the
municipal boundaries of the City which will be developed or altered in connection with the
development of a municipal or industrial water project.
Transmission mainline shall mean a domestic water supply system’s line that is designed to
transport raw or treated water from a water source to a water treatment plant, storage facility or
distribution systems, and having the characteristic that it does not allow customer service taps.
Wastewater treatment plant shall mean a facility or group of units used for treatment
of industrial or domestic wastewater or the reduction and handling of solids and gases removed
from such wastes, whether or not such facility or group of units discharges into state waters.
Wastewater treatment plant specifically excludes individual wastewater disposal systems such as
septic tanks or leach fields.
Water Distribution main shall mean a domestic water supply system’s pipeline that is designed to
transport treated water from a transmission main to individual water customers through service
laterals.
Water Distribution system shall mean a network of pipes and conduits through which water is
piped for human consumption or a network of pipes and conduits through which water is piped in
exchange or trade for human consumption.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
11
Water diversion shall mean removing water from its natural course or location or controlling water
in its natural course or location by means of a control structure, canal, flume, reservoir,
bypass, pipeline, conduit, well, pump or other structure or device.
Water treatment plant shall mean the facilities within the domestic water supply system that
regulate the physical, chemical or bacteriological quality of the water.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
12
DIVISION 1
Administrative Regulations
Section 2
Procedure for Designation of Matters of State Interest
1-201 City Council to Make Designations.
Designations and amendments of designations may be initiated in twothree ways:
(A) The City Council may in its discretion designate and adopt regulations for the
administration of any matter of state interest.
(B) The Planning and Zoning Commission may on its own motion or upon City Council
request, recommend the designation of matters of state interest to City Council. The City
Council shall decide, in its sole discretion, whether or not to designate any or all of the
requested matters of state interest.
(C) City staff may request that City Council designate an area or activity of state interest and
adopt regulations for the administration of the matter designated. The City Council shall
decide, in its sole discretion, whether or not to designate any or all of the requested matters
of state interest.
1-202 Public Hearing Required.
The City Council shall hold a public hearing before designating any matter of state interest and
adopting regulations for the administration thereof. Said hearing shall be held not less than thirty
(30) days nor more than sixty (60) days after the giving of public notice of said hearing.
1-203 Notice of Public Hearing; Publication.
(A) The City shall prepare a notice of the designation hearing which shall include:
(1) The time and place of the hearing;
(2) The place at which materials relating to the matter to be designated and any guidelines
and regulations for the administration thereof may be examined;
(3) The telephone number and e-mail address where inquiries may be answered;
(4) A description of the area or activity proposed to be designated in sufficient detail to
provide reasonable notice as to property which would be included.
(B) At least thirty (30) days, but no more than sixty (60) days before the public hearing, the
City shall publish the notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and shall mail
the notice to each of the following as deemed appropriate in the City’s discretion:
(1) State and federal agencies;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
13
(2) Any local government jurisdiction that would be directly or indirectly affected by the
designation.
1-204 Matters to be Considered at Designation Hearing.
At the public hearing, the City Council shall receive into the public record:
(A) Testimony and evidence from any and all persons or organizations desiring to appear and
be heard, including City staff;
(B) Any documents that may be offered; and
(C) The recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
1-205 Record of Designation Proceeding.
The City Council shall collect and preserve the following record of the public hearing:
1-206 Adoption of Designations and Regulations.
(A) City Council shall consider the following when determining whether to designate an area
or activity to be of state interest:
(1) All testimony, evidence and documents taken and admitted at the public hearing;
(2) The intensity of current and foreseeable development pressures in the City;
(3) The matters and considerations set forth in any applicable guidelines or model
regulations issued by the Colorado Land Use commission and other State agencies; and
(4) Reasons why the particular area or activity is of state interest, the dangers that would
result from uncontrolled development of any such area or uncontrolled conduct of such
activity, and the advantages of development of such area or conduct of such activity in
a coordinated manner.
(B) Any City Council order designating an area or activity to be of state interest and the
adoption of any regulations for the administration of an area or activity of state interest
shall be by ordinance.
(C) In the event the City Council finally determines that any matter is a matter of state interest
within the City, it shall be the City Council’s duty to designate such matter and adopt
regulations for the administration thereof.
(D) Each designation order adopted by the City Council shall:
(1) Specify the boundaries of the designated area of state interest or the boundary of the
area in which an activity of state interest has been designated; and
(2) State reasons why the particular area or activity is of state interest, the dangers that
would result from uncontrolled development of any such area or uncontrolled conduct
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
14
of such activity, and the advantages of development of such area or conduct of such
activity in a coordinated manner.
1-207 Effect of Designation – Moratorium Until Final Determination.
After a matter of state interest is designated, no person shall engage in development in such area
and no such activity shall be conducted until the designation and regulations for such area or
activity are finally determined as required by Section 24-65.1-404 (4), C.R.S.
1-208 Mapping Disputes.
Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundary of any designated area and
where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions, the
City Council shall make the necessary boundary determination at a public hearing after providing
notice pursuant to Section 1-203.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
15
DIVISION 1
Administrative Regulations
Section 3
Designated Activities of State Interest
1-301 Designated Activities of State Interest.
The City Council has designated the following matters of state interest for regulation:
(A) Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic Water and Sewage
Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Existing Domestic Water and Sewage
Treatment Systems (Ordinance No. 22, 2021)
(B) Site Selection of Arterial Highways and Interchanges and Collector Highways
(Ordinance No. 22, 2021)
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
16
DIVISION 1
Administrative Regulations
Section 4
Exemptions
1-401 Exemptions.
These Regulations are not applicable to the following:
(A) Any use otherwise lawfully existing on the date the area or activity is designated or
subjected to these Regulations which use becomes nonconforming as a result of the
adoption of these Regulations. Such nonconforming uses shall be governed by Division
6.161.5 with the exception that enlargement or expansion of nonconforming uses shall
require a permit under these Regulations. An enlargement or expansion requiring a permit
shall not include the maintenance, repair or replacement of existing buildings or structures
associated with such use, including retrofitting or updating technology, provided any
changes do not result in a material change as determined by the Director. Enlargements or
expansions not requiring a permit may still be subject to Section 6.16.51.5.5.
(B) Any approved development plan that would be subject to these Regulations but for which
a currently valid building permit has been issued by the City as of the effective date of
these Regulations.
(C) Any proposed project that would be subject to these Regulations but does not meet the
Land Use Code definition of development.
(B) (D) Any site specific development plan that would be subject to these Regulations but has
received final Cityplan approval as of the effective date of these Regulations so long as the
vested rights for such final approved site specific development plan have not expired. This
The exemption does not apply to any subsequent modifications to the approved finalsite
specific development plan or expansion of the development site that was not included
within the City approved application and for which a new or revised development
application is required.
(C) Any proposed development plan otherwise subject to these Regulations but such proposed
development plan is (1) subject to review and approval as part of the review of a proposed
residential, commercial, industrial or mixed-use project under a development review
process other than Site Plan Advisory Review under the Land Development Code, and (2)
which proposed development plan is directly necessitated by a proposed residential,
commercial, industrial or mixed-use development.
(D) Any proposed development plan issued a FONAI pursuant to Section 2-304.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
17
Division 2
Permits
Section 1 Permit Authority
2-101 Permit Authority Established
Section 2 Intergovernmental Agreement In Lieu of Permit
2-201 Intergovernmental Agreement In Lieu of Permit
Section 3 Permit Application Procedures
2-301 Application Procedure Overview
2-302 Application Fee; Financial Security Waiver
2-303 Determination of Level of Permit Review
2-3034 Pre-Application Area or Activity Review
2-304 Determination of Applicability of Regulations- FONAI
2-305 Neighborhood Meeting
2-306 Application Submission Requirements
2-307 Determination of Completeness
2-308 Referral Agencies
2-309 Simultaneous Processing of Associated Development Applications
2-310 Combined Application for Multiple Activities or Development in More than One
Area of State Interest.
2-311 Permit Decision Making Procedures
2-312 Conduct of Full Permit Hearings
2-313 Approval or Denial of Permit Application
2-314 Issuance of Permit, Conditions
Section 4 Common Review Standards
2-401 Review Standards for All Applications
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
18
DIVISION 2
Permits
Section 1
Permit Authority
2-101 Permit Authority Established.
(A) The Fort Collins Permit Authority is hereby established consisting of the Fort Collins
City Council, or with respect to matters delegated by these Regulations, the Director
and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
(B) The Director shall be the decision maker regarding issuing or not issuing a
FONSI,FONAIlevel of permit review, and administrative permits. Administrative
permits are reviewed pursuant to the basic development review procedure set forth in
Divisions 2.18 and 2.20 and these Regulations.
(C) The Planning and Zoning Commission shall be the decision maker regarding appeals
of Director decisions to issue or not issue a FONSIFONAI, level of permit review,
and administrative permit decisions and recommendations to City Council regarding
full permits.
(D) The City Council shall be the decision maker for approving or not approving permits.
The City Council shall also be the decision maker regarding appeals of Planning and
Zoning Commission decisions regarding the appeal of Director decisions to issue or
not issue a FONSIFONAI, level of permit review, and administrative permit
decisions and full permits. Full pPermits are reviewed by the City Council pursuant to
the procedure set forth in Division ___2.20 and these Regulations.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
19
Division 2
Permits
Section 2
Intergovernmental Agreement In Lieu of Permit
2-201 Intergovernmental Agreements.
Upon the request of the State of Colorado or a political subdivision of the State, as defined by
Section 29-1-202, C.R.S., proposing to engage in a designated activity of state interest or
development in a designated area of state interest, the requirements of these Regulations may be
met by the approval of an intergovernmental agreement between the City and the State or political
subdivision applicant. The City Council may, but shall be under no obligation to, approve such an
intergovernmental agreement in lieu of requiring an approved permit pursuant to these Regulations
and the approval of any intergovernmental agreement is a legislative act that must occur by
ordinance. In the event such an agreement is approved by the City, no approved permit application
shall be required, provided that all of the following conditions are met:
(A) The State or political subdivision applicant and the City must both be authorized by Article
XIV, Section 18(2) of the Colorado Constitution and Section 29-1-201, et seq., to enter
into the agreement.
(B) The purpose and intent of these Regulations must be satisfied by the terms of the
agreement.
(C) Action on the proposed intergovernmental agreement by the governing body of the State
or political subdivision applicant must be in the manner required of it by the Colorado
Constitution and statutes.
(D) Exercise of the provisions of this Section by the State or political subdivision applicant will
not prevent that entity from electing at any time to seek a permit pursuant to these
Regulations. Additionally, any entity which has previously proceeded under the permit
provisions of these Regulations may at any time elect to proceed instead under this Section.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
20
Division 2
Permits
Section 3
Permit Application Procedures
2-301 Application Procedure Overview.
The application procedure for activities and areas of state interest are described in Land Use
Code Division 2.20 and in these Regulations and must be read together along with other
applicable portions of the Land Development Code in order to fully understand the procedure.
The following summary of the procedure is provided for convenience:
(A) Conceptual/Preliminary Design Review. A proposed development plan first undergoes a
conceptual or preliminary design review, unless waived pursuant to Section 2.20(C)(1),
to determine whether the project may be subject to these Regulations. Based upon the
conceptual or preliminary design review, proposed development plans that may be
subject to these regulations must then undergo a pre-application area or activity review.
(B) Pre-application Area or Activity Review. In addition to providing information on the
application requirements and the review process, the purpose of the pre-application area
or activity review is to determine the level of permit review as described in Sections 2-
303 and 2-304 and whether the permit is:
(1) Not likely to have significant adverse impacts, a finding of no significant impact or
FONSI, and is not subject to these Regulations. The decision to issue or not issue a
FONSI is subject to appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission; or
(2) Subject to administrative permit review; or
(3) Subject to full permit review.
(C) Unless waived pursuant to Section 2-305, a neighborhood meeting must be conducted at
least ten (10) days prior to submittal of a permit application.
(D) Once at least ten (10) days have passed after the neighborhood meeting, if required, a
permit application may be submitted, and the application submission requirements are
described in Section 2-306.
(E) Upon submittal of an application, City review of the application shall not commence until
the Director determines that the application is complete or has informed the applicant of
any additional information required for the application to be deemed complete pursuant
to Section 2-307. Once an application is deemed complete, referral agencies will be
informed of the application pursuant to Section 2-307.
(F) Once the permit application has been fully reviewed, it is ready for a decision and the
timing and procedure for making a decision are described in Sections 2-311 through 2-
314.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
21
(G) The Director’s decisions to issue or not issue a FONSI, determining the appropriate level
of permit review, and to approve or not approve an administrative permit are subject to
appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission
decision on appeal of any of these Director’s decisions is subject to further appeal to City
Council.
2-302 Application Fee; Financial Security Waiver.
(A) Each pre-application area or activity review application and development application for a
permit submitted must be accompanied by the fees established pursuant to Section
2.2.3(D). The Director may determine at any time during the pre-application review and
development application review process that it is necessary to retain a third-party
consultant to assist in reviewing the application pursuant to Section 6.3.32.2.3(D). All costs
incurred in the third-party consultant review shall be borne by the applicant in addition to
the City’s internal application review fees.
(B) A referral agency may impose a fee for the review of a development application and the
applicant shall pay such fee. No hearings by the Permit Authority will be held if any such
referral agency’s fee has not been paid.
2-303 Determination of Level of Permit Review.
The Director shall make the initial determination whether a permit is required pursuant to these
Regulations. There are two levels of permit review under these Regulations: (1) administrative
permit review for which the Director is the decision maker; and (2) full permit review for which
the City Council is the decision maker. The Director shall determine the appropriate level of
permit review based upon the pre-application area and activity review meeting described in
Section 2-304 and any required follow up information or third-party consultation.
(A) FONSI. Based on the information provided at and for the pre-application area and
activity review meeting as described in Section 2-304 and any required follow up
information or third-party consultation, the Director may make a finding that no
significant impacts, or FONSI, are likely to occur from the proposed development plan
and therefore a permit under these Regulations is not required.
(1) The Director may issue a FONSI if the construction or operation of the proposed
development plan in its proposed location without additional mitigation is
unlikely to have any significant adverse impact(s) within the city in consideration
of the applicable approval criteria in these Regulations. The decision to issue or
not issue a FONSI shall be in writing and describe in detail how this criterion has
or has not been met. At the applicant’s cost, the written decision shall be mailed
to the applicant, to the property owners within one-thousand (1000) feet in all
directions of the location of the proposed development plan and shall also be
posted on the City's website at www.fcgov.com.The Director decision to issue or
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
22
not issue a FONSI is subject to appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 2.2.12(D).
(2) If the Director issues a FONSI, the applicant does not need to submit a permit
application under these Regulations. However, issuance of a FONSI does not
exempt the proposed development plan from all Land Use Code requirements and
an alternative review process may be required.
(B) If the Director determines a FONSI is not appropriate and the proposed development plan
is subject to these Regulations, the Director shall determine whether the proposed
development plan should be subject to the administrative permit review or full permit
review process. The Director shall make the determination based on the following
criteria:
Administrative Permit Full Permit
Whether the proposed development
plan has received written consent from
affected property owners or obtained
easements necessary for completion of
the proposed development plan, and
Whether the development plan requires the
use of eminent domain, or
Whether the proposed development
plan will likely result in significant
adverse impacts in only one (1)
category of development standards.
Whether the proposed development plan
will likely result in significant adverse
impacts in two (2) or more categories of
approval criteria.
(1) The Director’s determination of the appropriate level of review shall be based upon
information provided for and at the pre-application review, any additional
information the Director requests from the applicant after the pre-application review,
and any third-party consultant input.
(2) At any time prior to the final decision on a permit application, the Director may
determine that information received subsequent to the level of permit determination
indicates that the nature and scope of the impacts are that of a different level of permit
review. If a different level of permit review is required, the Director shall notify the
applicant in writing within seven (7) days of the Director’s revised determination. If a
revised determination is issued subsequent to the permit application being deemed
complete pursuant to Section 2-307, the schedule and procedure described in Section
2-311 shall reset from the date such revised determination is made as though the
application had been deemed complete on the revised determination date.
(3) Each Director determination or revised determination shall be in writing and describe
in detail the reasons for the determination. The Director shall make this determination
within twenty-eight (28) days after the latter of the pre-application review meeting or
the date of receipt of any requested additional information or third-party consultation.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
23
Each determination shall be in writing and describe in detail the basis for the
determination. At the applicant’s cost, the written decision shall be mailed to the
applicant, to the property owners within one-thousand (1000) feet in all directions of
the location of the proposed development plan and shall also be posted on the City's
website at www.fcgov.com. Director determinations and revised determinations are
subject to appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 2.2.12(D).
(4) The Director’s initial level of review determination and any revised determination
pursuant to (2) above are subject to appeal pursuant to Land Use Code Section
2.2.12(D). The filing of a timely notice of appeal pursuant to Section 2.2.12(D) shall
prevent the Director from revising a determination and decision issued to resolve the
appeal is not subject to Director revision. The filing of a timely notice of appeal shall
stay any time period set forth in Section 2-311 until the appeal is decided and a
change in the level of review from administrative to full permit or vice versa shall
reset the schedule and procedure described in Section 2-311.
2-303 2-304 Pre-Application Area or Activity Review.
(A) After conceptual or preliminary design review has occurred or has been waived pursuant
to Section ___2.20(C)(1), and before holding a neighborhood meeting or submitting a
permit application, the Director shall require a pre-application area or activity review for
proposed development plans that may be subject to these Regulations.
(B) To schedule the pre-application area or activity review, the applicant must first provide the
Director with the following:
(1) Names and addresses of all persons proposing the activity or development;
(2) Name and qualifications of the person(s) responding on behalf of the applicant;
(3) A written summary of the proposed development plan including a map prepared at an
easily readable scale showing:
(a) The boundaries of the proposed development plan;
(b) The relationship of the proposed development plan to surrounding
topographicnatural habitats and features and human-made features and cultural
featuressuch as ridgelines, historic resources, roads, streams, wetlands, and existing
structures;
(c) The location of pProposed buildings, improvements and infrastructure to be
constructed as part of the proposed development plan; and
(d) A written summary of the proposed development plan that sufficiently describes
the impacts of the proposed development plan as it relates to applicable approval
standards set forth in these RegulationsInformation that is sufficient for
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
24
determining the nature of the development plan and degree of impacts associated
with the development plan.
(e) Siting and design alternatives.
(4) The required application fee and applicant agreement to pay the costs of (1) the Director
retaining third-party consultants necessary to assist the Director in making the
determination of the appropriate level of review pursuant toapplicability of these
Regulations pursuant to Section 2-3043; (2) the Director retaining third-party
consultants necessary to assist the Director with the completeness review of any
submitted application pursuant to Section 2-307; and (3) the Director retaining third-
party consultants necessary to assist City staff in reviewing a complete permit
application or City Council in rendering a decision on a permit; and
(5) Any additional information requested by the Director as necessary to make a
determination of the appropriate level of review applicability of these Regulations
pursuant to Section 2-3043.
(C) The purpose of the pre-application meeting is to determine if a permitthe appropriate
permit, if anyis, required for the proposed development plan, application submittal
requirements, procedural requirements, and relevant agencies to coordinate with as part of
any permit review process. Topics of discussion may include, as relevant to the specific
application, but are not limited to:
(1) Characteristics of the activity, including its location, significant proximity to natural
and human-made features, with particular attention to natural hazard, resource or other
special areas; the size and accessibility of the site; surrounding development and land
uses; and its potential impact on surrounding areas, including potential environmental
effects and planned mitigation strategies.
(2) The nature of the development proposed, including land use types and their densities;
placement of proposed buildings, pipelines, structures, operations, and maintenance;
the protection of natural habitats and features, historic resources, and City natural areas,
parks, or other City property or assets; staging areas during construction; alternatives
considered; proposed parking areas and internal circulation system, including trails, the
total ground coverage of paved areas and structures; and types of water and wastewater
treatment systems proposed.
(3) Proposed mitigation of adverse impacts
(4) Siting and design alternatives and reasons why such alternatives are not feasible.
(5) (3) Community policy considerations, including the review process and likely
conformity of the proposed development with the policies and requirements of these
Regulations.
(6) (4) Applicable regulations, review procedures and submission requirements.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
25
(7) (5) Other regulatory reviews or procedures to which the applicant is subject, the
applicant's time frame for the proposed development plan, and other applicant
concerns.
(D) In addition to providing the applicant with a written determination pursuant to Section 2-
3043 of thewhether the Director has made a finding of negligible adverse impacts, or
FONAI,appropriate level of review, if any, the Director shall provide the applicant with
written comments, to the extent such comments differ from comments provided for any
conceptual or preliminary design review, regarding the proposal to inform and assist the
applicant in preparing components of the permit application.
2-304 Determination of Applicability of Regulations- FONAI.
The Director shall determine the applicability of these Regulations based upon the pre-
application area or activity review meeting described in Section 2-303 and any required follow
up information or third-party consultation.
(A) The Director may make a finding of negligible adverse impacts, or FONAI, which has the
effect that no permit under these Regulations is required. The FONAI shall be evaluated
against the applicable review standards set forth in these Regulations as to whether the
proposed development plan may result in negligible adverse impacts in relation to each
respective standard. The FONAI review of negligible adverse impacts may or may not
include consideration of proposed mitigation depending on factors that may include, but
are not limited to, the scale, magnitude, and complexity of mitigation, and the sensitivity
of the resource being mitigated.
(1) If the Director issues a FONAI, the applicant does not need to submit a permit
application under these Regulations. However, issuance of a FONAI does not exempt
the proposed development plan from all Land Development Code requirements, and
an alternative review process may be required.
(2) If the Director issues a FONAI and the applicant subsequently makes material
changes to the development plan, the applicant is required to schedule another pre-
application area or activity review pursuant to Section 2-303 discuss the changes.
Based on the new information and whether the revised development could result in
adverse impacts, the Director may rescind the FONAI by issuing a written
determination pursuant to below Subsection (C) and require a permit under these
Regulations.
(B) Permit Required. If the Director determines a FONAI is not appropriate, the proposed
development plan requires a permit and is subject to these Regulations.
(C) Notice of Director’s Determination.
(1) The Director’s determination to issue a FONAI or require a permit shall be in writing
and describe in detail the reasons for the determination. The Director shall make this
determination within twenty-eight (28) days after the pre-application area or activity
review meeting or the date of receipt of any requested additional information or third-
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
26
party consultation. If a FONAI determination is not made within twenty-eight (28)
days, the proposed development plan shall be deemed not subject to these
Regulations and such deeming shall not be subject to appeal.
(2) At the applicant’s cost, the written decision shall be mailed to the applicant, to the
property owners within one-thousand (1000) feet in all directions of the location of
the proposed development plan as determined by the Director in their reasonable
discretion and shall also be posted on the City's website at www.fcgov.com.
(D) Appeal of the Director’s Determination. The Director’s determination pursuant to (C)
above is subject to appeal pursuant to Land Development Code Section ___. After the
filing of a timely notice of appeal pursuant to Section ___, the Director shall not accept
any application that may be affected by an appeal decision and, if an application has been
accepted, shall cease processing such application until the appeal has been decided,
which in the case of an appeal to Council shall be the date of adoption of the appeal
resolution. The filing of a timely notice of appeal shall reset any time period set forth in
2-307 and 2-311 and such time period shall begin from the date the appeal is decided as
previously described.
2-305 Neighborhood meeting.
If a development plan requires a permit under these Regulations, a Unless waived pursuant to this
Section, a neighborhood meeting is required pursuant to Land Development Code Section
___2.2.2. The meeting must be held at least ten (10) days prior to submission of a permit
application to the Director for completeness review pursuant to these Regulations. The Director
may waive this requirement only for a proposed development plan determined to be subject to
administrative permit review if the Director determines such development plan would not have
significant neighborhood impacts. A neighborhood meeting may not be waived for a proposed
development plan determined to be subject to full permit review. Notice of the neighborhood
meeting shall be given in accordance with Section 2.2.6(A), (B) and (D).
2-306 Application Submission Requirements.
In addition to specific submission requirements for the activities addressed in Divisions 3, 4 and
5, all applications for a permit under these Regulations shall be accompanied by the following
materials, as appropriate in the number required by the Director:
(A) Completed application form in the format established by the Director.
(B) Any plan, study, survey or other information, in addition to the information required by
this Section, at the applicant’s expense, as in the Director’s judgment is necessary to enable
the Permit Authority to make a determination on the application. Such additional
information may include applicant’s written responses to comments by a referral agency.
Additional materials may be required by the Director for a particular type of proposed development
plan. To the extent an applicant has prepared or submitted materials for a federal, state, county, or
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
27
city permit which are substantially the same as required herein, a copy of those materials may be
submitted to satisfy the corresponding requirement below.
2-307 Determination of Completeness.
(A) No permit application may be processed, nor shall a full permit be deemed received
pursuant to Section 24-65.1-501(2)(a), C.R.S., until the Director has determined it to be
complete. Following the pre-application review meeting and neighborhood meeting, the
applicant may submit a permit application only after at least ten (10) days have passed
since the neighborhood meeting and any application must be in the form approved as
Appendix B or C, as applicable to the chosen activity or activities of state interest being
applied for. Upon submittal of the application, the Director shall determine whether the
application is complete or whether additional information is required, and if so, shall
inform the applicant and pause the completeness review until information is received. Any
request for waiver of a submission requirement shall be processed prior to the Director
making a determination that an application is complete. The Director may retain at the
applicant’s cost third-party consultants necessary to assist the Director with the
completeness review.
(B) No determination of completeness may exceed sixty (60) days unless one or more of the
following occurs:
(1) The Director determines in writing that more than sixty (60) days is necessary to
determine completeness in consideration of the size and complexity of the proposed
development plan or available City resources. In such case, the Director shall
determine how many additional days are needed, which shall not exceed sixty (60)
additional days.
(2) The Director and the applicant agree in writing to exceed sixty (60) days.
(C) (B) When the Director has determined that a submitted application is complete, or the time
limit for making the completeness determination has elapsed even though the application
may not be complete, the Director shall note upon the application the date and hour inform
the applicant in writing of the date of its receipt. Only upon the Director’s determination
that an application is complete, or the time limit for making the completeness determination
has elapsed even though the application may not be complete, may the City’s formal review
process commence pursuant to these Regulations.
2-308 Referral Agencies.
All permit applications under these Regulations shall be referred to internal and external review
agencies as determined by the Director, including for pre-application submittals, completeness
reviews and final application submittals. Copies of any such referral agency comments received
shall be promptly forwarded to the applicant for its response at the time that comments are provided
from City review staff.
2-309 Simultaneous Processing of Associated Development Applications.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
28
If a development plan subject to these Regulations contains project components not subject to
these Regulations but subject to other requirements in the Land Use Development Code that result
in an additional and separate different development application, then both development
applications can be processed simultaneously.
2-310 Combined Application for Multiple Activities or Development in More than One
Area of State Interest.
When approval is sought to conduct more than one activity of state interest, engage in development
in more than one area of state interest, or a combination of activities and areas, a combined
application may be completed for all such activities or developments in areas of state interest
determined to have the same level of review pursuant to Section 2-303 and may be reviewed
simultaneously and, if appropriate in the discretion of City Council, a single determination made
to grant or deny permit approval permit issued. The City reserves the right to charge an application
fee pursuant to Section 2-302 of these Regulations for each activity or area that is the subject of a
combined application.
2-311 Permit Decision Making Procedures
When an application has been determined complete by the Director pursuant to Section 2-307 of
these Regulations, or the time limit for making the completeness determination has elapsed even
though the application may not be complete, then, and only then, shall the permit review process
commence. At that time, the following schedule shall apply:
(A) Administrative Permits. For administrative permits, no public hearing is held, and the
application is reviewed and decided pursuant to the basic development review procedure
set forth in Divisions 2.18 and 2.20 and these Regulations. The Director decision on an
administrative permit must be issued within ninety (90) days of the date the application is
determined to be complete pursuant to Section 2-307 or the application shall be deemed
approved. To the extent a permit is deemed approved because the Director has not made a
decision, issuance of a written decision pursuant to Section 2.18.3(G) is not required.
(A) (B)Full Permits.No later than thirty (30) days after the receipt of a completed application,
the Director will schedule a hearing before City Council. The thirty (30) day period to
schedule the hearing may be extended if the applicant agrees to an extension in writing.
Prior to such hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall forward a
recommendation to City Council to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the permit
application.
(B) The Director may retain third-party consultants at the applicant’s expense necessary to
assist City staff in reviewing a complete permit application or assist City Council in
rendering a decision on a permit.
(C) (1)Upon setting a hearing date, the Director shall publish notice once in a newspaper of
general circulation in the City of Fort Collins containing:
(1) (a)The date, time, and place of each permit hearing not less than thirty (30) nor
more than sixty (60) days before the date set for the hearing. The thirty (30) and
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
29
sixty (60) day periods may be extended if the applicant agrees to an extension in
writing.
(2) (b)The date, time, and place of the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing where
a recommendation will be made at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing.
(D) (2)At least fourteen (14) days prior to thea City Council full permit hearing, the Director
shall mail notice of the date, time, and place of the hearing to the applicant and to property
owners pursuant to Section 6.3.62.2.6. Notice of the Planning and Zoning Commission
hearing where a recommendation will be made shall also be mailed at least fourteen (14)
days prior to such hearing pursuant to Section 6.3.62.2.6 and may be combined with the
mailed notice for the City Council hearing.
2-312 Conduct of Full Permit Hearing.
City Council full permit hearings and the associated Planning and Zoning Commission hearings
where a recommendation is made shall follow the requirements and procedures of Section
6.3.72.2.7. With regards to hearings before City Council, the public hearing process shall be
deemed completed at the closing of the public hearing. No further comments or evidence will be
received from the public, agencies or applicant, including at any general public comment period
for a City Council meeting or public comment associated with a specific agenda item such as a
designation associated with a permit application, unless specifically authorized by City Council
the Permit Authority by reopening the public hearing.
2-313 Approval or Denial of Permit Application.
(A) The burden of proof shall be upon the applicant to show compliance with all applicable
standards of the Regulations. To the extent a permit application may not comply with a
particular standard, the applicant may demonstrate compliance with such standard by
proposing mitigation measures that sufficiently offset the extent of noncompliance.
(B) A permit application to conduct a designated activity of state interest or develop in a
designated area of state interest may not be approved unless the applicant satisfactorily
demonstrates that the proposal, in consideration of all proposed mitigation measures,
complies with all the applicable criteria. The permit shall be denied unless City Council
determines that reasonable conditions can be imposed on the permit which will enable the
permit to comply with the applicable criteria.
(C) (B) If the Permit AuthorityCity Council finds that there is insufficient information
concerning any of the applicable standards, Permit AuthorityCity Council may deny the
permit, may approve with conditions which if fulfilled, would bring the development plan
into compliance with all applicable standards, or in the case of a full permit, or may
continue the public hearing, or reopen a previously closed public hearing, for additional
information to be received. However, no such continuance to receive additional evidence
may exceed sixty (60) days unless agreed to by Permit AuthorityCity Council and the
applicant.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
30
(D) (C) The Permit AuthorityCity Council shall approve a permit application if the proposed
development plan satisfies all applicable review standards, in consideration of proposed
mitigation measures, of these Regulations. The Permit AuthorityCity Council may also
impose additional conditions pursuant to Section 2-314 on any permit.
(D) For full permits:
(E) (1)City Council may close the public hearing and make a decision, or it may continue the
matter for a decision only. However, City Council shall make a decision by majority vote
within one hundred twentyninety (90120) days after the closing of the public hearing, or
the permit shall be deemed approved. To the extent the public hearing is reopened and
closed, the closing date of the public hearing shall be measured from the most recent
closing date.
(F) (2) No later than the date of its next regular meeting after making its decision, City Council
shall adopt by resolution findings of fact in support of its decision and, if approved, the
written permit shall be attached to such resolution. To the extent a permit is deemed
approved because City Council has not made a decision, adoption of such a resolution is
not required.
(E) For administrative permits, decisions shall be issued pursuant to Division 2.18.
Administrative permit decisions may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission
for a de novo review and decision pursuant to Sections 2.2.12(C) and 2.18.3(L).
2-314 Issuance of Permit; Conditions.
(A) The Permit AuthorityCity Council may attach conditions to the permit pursuant to Section
6.3.92.2.9 and additional conditions to ensure that the purpose and requirements of these
Regulations are continuously met throughout the development, execution, operational life,
and any decommissioning period. A development agreement between the City and the
permittee may be required as a condition of approval.
(B) Issuance of a permit signifies only that a development plan has satisfied, or conditionally
satisfied, the applicable Regulations, and prior to commencing any development,
conditions of the permit, additional Land Use Development Code, Code of the City of Fort
Collins, other City requirements, or other state or federal requirements, may need to be
met.
(C) Subject to (D) below and Section 5-201, Tthe permit may be issued for an indefinite term
or for a specified period of time with such period depending upon the size and complexity
of the development plan.
(D) If the permittee fails to take substantial steps to initiate the permitted development plan
within twelve (12) months from the date of the approval of the permit or such other time
period specified in the permit, or if such steps have been taken but the applicant has failed
to complete the development with reasonable diligence, then the permit may be revoked or
suspended in accordance with Section 5-201. This time may be extended by the Director
for only one (1) additional year upon a showing of substantial progress.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
31
(E) All issued permits shall require that the permittee notify all fee owners of real property to
be used in completing the approved development plan that failure of the permittee to
comply with permit conditions may result in foreclosure of a City lien.
Division 2
Permits
Section 4
Common Review Standards
2-401 Review Standards for All Applications.
In addition to the review standards for specific activities listed at Divisions 3 and 4, all
applications under these Regulations, including proposed mitigation measures, shall be evaluated
against the following general standards, to the extent applicable or relevant to the development
plan, in the Permit AuthorityCity Council’s reasonable judgment. To the extent a permit
application may not comply with a particular standard, the applicant may demonstrate
compliance with such standard by proposing mitigation measures that sufficiently offset the
extent of noncompliance.
(A) All of the provisions of the permit application procedure have been complied withThe
applicant has obtained or will obtain all property rights, permits and approvals necessary for
the proposal, including surface, mineral and water rights.
(B) The health, welfare and safety of the community members citizens of the City will be protected
and served.
(C) The proposed activity is in conformance with the Fort Collins Comprehensive Plan and other
duly adopted plans of the City, or other applicable regional, state or federal land development
or water quality plan.
(D) The development plan is financially feasible. The determination of financial feasibility of the
development plan may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) The business plan submitted by the applicant.
(2) Relevant bond issue, loan and other financing approval or certifications including an
approved bond issue or bond counsel opinion.
(E) The development plan will not create an undue financial burden on existing or future residents
of the City.
(D) (F) The development plan is not subject to significant risk from natural or human caused
environmental hazards. The determination of risk from natural hazards to the development
plan may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Unstable slopes including landslides and rock slides.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
32
(2) Expansive or evaporative soils and risk of subsidence.
(3) Wildfire hazard areas.
(4) Floodplains.
(E) (G) The development plan will not have an significant adverse effect impact on the capability
of local governments affected by the development plan to provide local infrastructure and
services or exceed the capacity of service delivery systems. The determination of the effects
of the development plan on local government services may include but is not limited to the
following considerations:
(1) Current and projected capacity of roads, schools, infrastructure, drainage and/or
stormwater infrastructure, housing, and other local government facilities and services
necessary to accommodate development, and the impact of the development plan upon
the current and projected capacity.
(2) Changes caused by the development plan in the cost of providing education,
transportation networks, water treatment and wastewater treatment, stormwater
drainage, channel stabilization, bridges, emergency services, or other governmental
services or facilities.
(2) (3) Need for temporary roads or other infrastructure to access serve the development
plan for construction and maintenance.
(F) (H) The development plan will not have a significant adverse effectadversely impact on the
quality or quantity of recreational opportunities and experience. The determination of effects
impacts of the development plan on recreational opportunities and experience may include but
is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Changes to existing and projected visitor days.
(2) Changes in quality and quantity of fisheries.
(3) Changes in instream flows or reservoir levels.
(4) Changes in access to recreational resources.
(5) Changes to quality and quantity of hiking, biking, multi-use or horseback riding trails.
(6) Changes to regional open space.
(7) Changes to existing conservation easements.
(8) Changes to City parks, trails, natural areas, or recreation facilities.playgrounds,
community gardens, recreation fields or courts, picnic areas, and other City park
amenities.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
33
(G) (I) The development plan when completed will not significantly degrade adversely impact
existing visual quality. The determination of visual impaeffects of the development plan may
include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Visual changes to ground cover and vegetation, waterfalls and streams, or other natural
features.
(2) Interference with viewsheds and scenic vistas.
(3) Changes in landscape character types of unique land formations.
(4) Compatibility of structure size and color with scenic vistas and viewsheds.
(5) Changes to the visual character of regional open space.
(6) Changes to the visual character of existing conservation easements.
(7) Changes to the visual character of City parks, trails, natural areas, or recreation
facilities.
(H) (J) The development plan will not adversely impact significantly degrade air quality. The
determination of effects of the development plan on air quality may include but is not limited
to the following considerations:
(1) Changes in visibility and microclimates.
(2) Applicable air quality standards.
(3) Increased emissions of greenhouse gases.
(4) Emissions of air toxics.
(I) (K) The development plan will not significantly degradeadversely impact surface water
quality. The determination of effects impacts of the development plan on surface water quality
may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Changes to existing water quality, including patterns of water circulation, temperature,
conditions of the substrate, extent and persistence of suspended particulates and clarity,
odor, color or taste of water;
(2) Applicable narrative and numeric water quality standards.
(3) Changes in point and nonpoint source pollution loads.
(4) Increase in erosion.
(5) Changes in sediment loading to waterbodies.
(6) Changes in stream channel or shoreline stability.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
34
(7) Changes in stormwater runoff flows.
(8) Changes in trophic status or in eutrophication rates in lakes and reservoirs.
(9) Changes in the capacity or functioning of streams, lakes or reservoirs.
(10) Changes to the topography, natural drainage patterns, soil morphology and
productivity, soil erosion potential, and floodplains.
(11) Changes to stream sedimentation, geomorphology, and channel stability.
(12) Changes to lake and reservoir bank stability and sedimentation, and safety of existing
reservoirs.
(J) (L) The development plan will not significantly degradeadversely impact groundwater quality.
The determination of impactseffects of the development plan on groundwater quality may
include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Changes in aquifer recharge rates, groundwater levels and aquifer capacity including
seepage losses through aquifer boundaries and at aquifer-stream interfaces.
(2) Changes in capacity and function of wells within the impact area.
(3) Changes in quality of well water within the impacted area.
(K) (M) The development plan will not significantly degradeadversely impact wetlands and
riparian areas of any size regardless of jurisdictional status. In determining impacts to
wetlands and riparian areas, the following considerations shall include but not be limited to:
(1) Changes in the structure and function of wetlands.
(2) Changes to the filtering and pollutant uptake capacities of wetlands and riparian
areas.
(3) Changes to aerial extent of wetlands.
(4) Changes in species' characteristics and diversity.
(5) Transition from wetland to upland species.
(6) Changes in function and aerial extent of floodplains.
(L) (N) The development plan shall not significantly degradeadversely impact the quality of
terrestrial and aquatic animal life. In determining impacts to terrestrial and aquatic animal
life, the following considerations shall include but not be limited to:
(1) Changes that result in loss of oxygen for aquatic life.
(2) Changes in flushing flows.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
35
(3) Changes in species composition or density.
(4) Changes in number of threatened or endangered species.
(5) Changes to habitat and critical habitat, including calving grounds, mating grounds,
nesting grounds, summer or winter range, migration routes, or any other habitat
features necessary for the protection and propagation of any terrestrial animals.
(6) Changes to habitat and critical habitat, including stream bed and banks, spawning
grounds, riffle and side pool areas, flushing flows, nutrient accumulation and cycling,
water temperature, depth and circulation, stratification and any other conditions
necessary for the protection and propagation of aquatic species.
(7) Changes to the aquatic and terrestrial food webs.
(M) (O) The development plan shall not significantly degradeadversely impact the quality of
terrestrial and aquatic plant life. In determining impacts to terrestrial and aquatic animal life,
the following considerations shall include but not be limited to:
a. Changes to habitat of threatened or endangered plant species.
b. Changes to the structure and function of vegetation, including species
composition, diversity, biomass, and productivity.
c. Changes in advancement or succession of desirable and less desirable species,
including noxious weeds.
d. Changes in threatened or endangered species.
(N) (P) The development plan will not significantly degrade oradversely impact natural habitats
and features as defined in Land DevelopmentUse Code Section 5.6.13.4.1.
(O) (Q) The development plan will not adversely impact historic resources.
(P) The development plan will not adversely impact significant trees as defined in Land
Development Code Section 5.10.1.
(Q) The development plan will not significantly deteriorate adversely impact soils and geologic
conditions. The determination of effects impacts of the development plan on soils and
geologic conditions may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Loss of topsoil due to wind or water forces.
(2) Changes in soil erodibility.
(3) Physical or chemical soil deterioration.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
36
(4) Compacting, sealing and crusting.
(R) The development plan will not cause a nuisance. The determination of nuisance impactseffects
of the development plan may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
increase in odors, dust, fumes, glare, heat, noise, vibration or artificial light.
(S) The development plan will not result in unreasonable risk of releases of, or exposures to,
hazardous materials or regulated substances. The determination of the risk of release of, or
increased exposures to, hazardous materials or regulated substances caused by the
development plan may include but is not limited to the following considerations:
(1) Plans for compliance with federal and state handling, storage, disposal, and
transportation requirements.
(2) Use of waste minimization techniques.
(3) Adequacy of spill and leak prevention and response plans.
(T) For applications requiring an evaluation of alternatives, the proposed development plan must,
to the extent reasonably feasible, be the least environmentally impactful alternative among
the alternatives analyzed.
(T) The development plan will not have negative impacts that fall disproportionately on
disproportionately impacted communities within the City considering, for example, the
distribution of impacts to the following:
a. Air quality.
b. Water quality.
c. Soil contamination.
d. Waste management.
e. Hazardous materials.
f. Access to parks, natural areas, trail and other recreational or natural amenities.
g. Nuisances.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
37
Division 3
Regulations for Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic
Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Such Systems
Section 1 General Provisions
3-101 Applicability
3-102 Purpose and Intent Designation of Site Selection and Construction of Major New
Domestic Water and Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Such Systems
Section 2 Specific Review Standards
3-201 Specific Review Standards for Major New Domestic Water or Sewage Treatment
Systems or Major Extensions
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
38
Division 3
Regulations for Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic
Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Such Systems
Section 1
General Provisions
3-101 Applicability.
These Regulations shall apply to the site selection and construction of all major new domestic
water and sewage treatment systems, and major extensions of such systems, wholly or partially
within the municipal boundaries of the City.
3-102 Purpose and Intent.
The specific purpose and intent of this Division 3 are:
(A) To ensure that new domestic water and sewage treatment systems and major extensions of
such systems are constructed in areas which will result in the proper utilization of existing
treatment plants and the orderly development of domestic water and sewage treatment
systems within the City;
(B) To ensure that site selection and construction of major new domestic water and sewage
treatment systems and major extensions of such systems are conducted in such a manner
as to minimizeavoid or fully mitigate environmental impacts associated with such
development;
(C) To ensure that site selection and construction of major new domestic water and sewage
treatment systems and major extensions of such systems are planned and developed in a
manner so as not to impose an undue economic burden on existing or proposed
communities or ratepayers within the City;
(D) To ensure that urban development, population densities, and site layout and design of
water, wastewater, storm water and sanitation systems shall be accomplished in a manner
that will prevent the pollution of aquifer recharge areas;
(D) (E) To ensure that the off-site adverse impacts of new domestic water and sewage treatment
systems are effectively avoided or fully mitigated; and
(E) (F) To ensure that the surface and groundwater resources of the City are protected from
any adverse impact of the development of major water and sewage treatment systems and
major extensions of such systems.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
39
Division 3
Regulations for Site Selection and Construction of Major New Domestic
Water and Sewage Treatment Systems and Major Extension of Such Systems
Section 2
Specific Review Standards
3-201 Specific Review Standards for Major New Domestic Water or Sewage Treatment
Systems or Major Extensions.
A permit application for the site selection and construction of a major new domestic water or
sewage treatment system or major extension of such system shall be approved with or without
conditions only if the development plan complies with the review standards in Section 2-401 and
the below standards, to the extent applicable or relevant. To the extent a permit application may
not comply with a particular standard, the applicant may demonstrate compliance with such
standard by proposing mitigation measures that sufficiently offset the extent of noncompliance. If
the Permit Authority finds the development plan does not comply with all applicable standards,
the permit shall be denied or, in the discretion of the Permit Authority, may be approved with
conditions which if fulfilled, would bring the development plan into compliance with all applicable
standards. The Permit Authority may also impose additional conditions pursuant to Section 2-314.
The specific review standards are:
(A) New domestic water and sewage treatment systems shall be constructed in areas which will
result in the proper use of existing treatment plants and the orderly development of
domestic water and sewage treatment systems within the City;
(B) Adequate water supplies, as determined by the Colorado Department of Health, are
available for efficient operational needs;
(B) (C) Existing domestic water treatment systems servicing the area must be at or near
operational capacity as determined by the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment;
(C) (D) Existing domestic sewage treatment facilities servicing the area must be at a level
requiring expansion as determined by the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environmentor greater than eighty percent (80%) of operational capacity;
(D) (E) The scope and nature of the proposed development will not compete with existing water
and sewage services or create duplicative services;
(F) Age of existing water and sewage systems, operational efficiency, state of repair or level
of treatment is such that replacement is warranted;
(G) Area and community development and population trends demonstrate clearly a need for
such development;
(H) Existing facilities cannot be upgraded or expanded to meet waste discharge permit
conditions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission;
(I) Easements can be obtained for any associated transmission line or interceptor line that will
serve existing and proposed needs;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
40
(J) The benefits of the proposed development plan outweigh the losses of any natural resources
or agricultural lands rendered unavailable of less productive as a result of the proposed
development;
(I) (K) The proposed development plan, if for a domestic water system, is capable of providing
water meeting the requirements of the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment and other state and federal water quality requirements.; and
(L) All jurisdictions receiving water diverted from within City limits must demonstrate adopted
policies, regulations and programs related to water conservation are sufficient to reduce lower
per capita water use over time. Such policies, regulations and programs may include but not
be limited to:
(1) Green plumbing code.
(2) Indoor efficiency standards.
(3) Reuse of water.
(4) Smart meters.
(5) Submetering multifamily units.
(6) Incentive and rebate programs to reduce water use.
(7) Demand-based tap fees.
(8) Xeriscape/turf limitations code requirements.
(9) Irrigation efficiency code requirements.
(10) Post-occupancy violations.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
41
Division 4
Site Selection of Arterial Highways
and Interchanges and Collector Highways
Section 1 General Provisions
4-101 Applicability
4-102 Purpose and Intent
Section 2 Specific Standards
4-201 Specific Review Standards for Arterial Highway, Interchange or Collector Highway
Projects
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
42
Division 4
Site Selection of Arterial Highways
and Interchanges and Collector Highways
Section 1
General Provisions
4-101 Applicability.
This Division shall apply to the site selection of all arterial highways and interchanges and
collector highways wholly or partially within the municipal boundaries of the City.
4-102 Purpose and Intent.
The specific purpose and intent of this Division are:
(A) To facilitate the local administration of site selection of arterial highways and interchanges
and collector highways by establishing requirements which must be met before a site may
be selected;
(A) (B) To ensure that community traffic needs are met;
(B) (C)To provide for the continuation of desirable community traffic circulation patterns by
all modes;
(C) (D)To discourage expansion of demand for government services beyond the reasonable
capacity of the community or region to provide such services as determined by the City;
(D) (E)To prevent direct conflicts with local, regional and state master plans;
(E) (F)To ensure that highway and interchange development is compatible with surrounding
land uses;
(F) (G)To encourage the coordination of highway planning with community and development
plans;
(G) (H)To discourage traffic hazards and congestion;
(H) (I)To minimize sources of traffic noise, air and water pollution; and
(I) (J)To protect scenic, natural, historical and archeologicalcultural resources from
destruction.; and
(J) To ensure that site selection of arterial highways, interchanges and collector highways
occurs so that community land use, economic development, and traffic needs are met,
desirable community patterns are not disrupted, historic, natural and archeological values
are preserved, and such site selection conforms to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, as well
as regional and state master plans.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
43
Division 4
Site Selection of Arterial Highways
and Interchanges and Collector Highways
Section 2
Specific Standards
4-201 Specific Review Standards for Arterial Highway, Interchange or Collector Highway
Projects.
A permit for the site selection of an arterial highway, interchange or collector highway shall be
approved with or without conditions only if the proposed development plan complies with the
review standards in Section 2-401 and the below standards, to the extent applicable or relevant. To
the extent a permit application may not comply with a particular standard, the applicant may
demonstrate compliance with such standard by proposing mitigation measures that sufficiently
offset the extent of noncompliance. If the Permit Authority finds the development plan does not
comply with all applicable standards, the permit shall be denied or, in the discretion of the Permit
Authority, may be approved with conditions which if fulfilled, would bring the development plan
into compliance with all applicable standards. The Permit Authority may also impose additional
conditions pursuant to Section 2-314. The specific review standards are:
(A) The proposed arterial highway, interchange or collector highway will be located so that
community traffic needs are met;
(B) The closure of frontage roads in association with arterial highways, interchanges and
collector highways occurs in a coordinated manner with the City and do not cause traffic
impacts.
(A) (C)The proposed arterial highway, interchange or collector highway will be located so that
natural habitats and features, historic resources, and City natural areas and parks and other
local government facilities and resources are protected to the maximum extent feasible;
(B) (D)The proposed arterial highway or interchange or collector highway will be located only
in a corridor for which a clear and reasonable local and regional need has been
demonstrated;
(C) (E)The location and access limitations for the arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not isolate community neighborhoods from and, where practicable, will
enhance access from community neighborhoods to public facilities including schools,
military installations, hospitals, mass transit, pedestrian walkways and bikeways,
recreational facilities and areas, community centers, government and social services
provider offices and facilities, natural areas, and open spaces;
(D) (F)The construction of the arterial highway and interchange or collector highway shall be
phased to minimize interference with traffic movement;
(E) (G)The location and access limitations for the arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not restrict access via to other roadways, mass transit facilities, pedestrian
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
44
walkways and bikeways, local commercial services, residential developments, business
and employment centers, and public facilities including schools, hospitals, recreational
facilities and areas, natural areas, and open spaces;
(F) (H)Alternative modes of transportation will be incorporated into the proposal to the extent
feasible;
(G) (I)If park-and-ride facilities are utilized, they shall be located in areas designated approved
by the City;
(H) (J)The location of the proposed new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not impede the delivery of essential community services and goods;
(I) (K)Desirable local and regional community land use patterns will not be disrupted by the
location of the proposed new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway;
(J) (L)The location and access limitations for the arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not create safety hazards to motorists, pedestrians or bicyclists by causing or
contributing to overuse, improper use or congestion, or cause unnecessary diversion of
regional traffic onto other City roadways or inappropriate or inadequate connections to
pedestrian and bicycle routes;
(K) (M)The proposed location of the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or
collector highway will be located so as to complement the efficient extension of planned
public services, utilities and development in general, both regionally and within the City;
(L) (N)The site selection for the proposed location of the new or expanded arterial highway,
interchange or collector highway will adhere to the plan, process, procedure and
requirements of the State and the Federal Highway Administration, and such construction,
expansion or modification will be included in the then-current Larimer-Weld Council of
Governments Regional Transportation Plan, Central Front Range Plan (CFR), the Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) Statewide Transportation Plan and the Statewide
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the Fort Collins Major Transportation
Corridor Planlocal and regional transportation plans;
(M) (O) The proposed location of the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or
collector highway will not result in the destruction, impairment or significant alteration of
sensitive, key commercial, tourist or visitor areas or districts within the City;
(N) (P)The proposed location of the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will not contribute to a negative economic impact to residential, commercial,
tourist or visitor areas or districts within the City;
(O) (Q)To the extent tolling is proposed, the use or level of tolling is appropriate in light of
existing toll levels, if any, and any prior or projected public infrastructure investment;
(P) (R)The proposed highways can be integrated into the regional transportation network;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
45
(Q) (S)The new or expandedproposed arterial highway, or interchange or collector highway
will not have a significant adverse impact on prime or unique farmland as defined by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service;
(T) Land acquisitions and/or the relocation of uses and improvements will follow the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act;
(R) The benefits of the development plan, including expected development in the regional and
local surroundings of the development site, will outweigh the social, fiscal, and
environmental impact and the loss of any scenic, historical, archeological, or natural
resources rendered unavailable as a result of the location of the development plan;
(S) The proposed location of the arterial highway, interchange or collector highway will not
result in the destruction, impairment or significant alteration of historic properties or
districts within the City and will not impair the function or historic integrity of a historic
resource of statewide importance;
(R) (W)The proposed location and design of the arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway does not cause lighting impacts from headlights or streetlights to nearby
residential neighborhoods or other developments or night sky objectives and plans;
(S) (X)Noise levels caused by the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or collector
highway will follow federal noise regulations; and
(T) (Y)Vertical sStructures and buildings will match the character of the cCity through
materials and design.
(U) (Z)The local air quality impacts of the new or expanded arterial highway, interchange or
collector highway shall support attainment of federal and state ambient air quality
standards and shall not increase risks to human health and the environment posed by air
pollutants.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
46
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 1 Financial Security
5-101 Financial Security
Section 2 Suspension or Revocation of Permits
5-201 Suspension or Revocation of Permits
Section 3 Review, Renewal, Amendment, Transfer
5-301 Annual Review; Progress Reports
5-302 Permit Renewal
5-303 Permit Amendment
5-304 TechnicalMinor Revision Not Constituting a Material Changeor Modification
5-305 Transfer of Permits
Section 4 Enforcement
5-401 Enforcement
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
47
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 1
Financial Security
5-101 Financial Security.
(A) Before any development occurs pursuant to an approved permit issued pursuant to these
Regulations, the applicant shall provide the City with a guarantee of financial security
deemed adequate by the Director to accomplish the purposes of this Section, in a form
approved by the City Attorney and payable to the City of Fort Collins. Parties signatory to
the financial guarantee shall include the permittee and all responsible parties as defined at
Section 1-110.
(B) The purpose of the financial guarantee is to ensure that the permittee shall faithfully
perform all requirements of the permit and the Director shall determine the amount of the
financial guarantee in consideration of the following standards, to the extent applicable or
relevant to the approved development plan:
(1) The estimated cost of returning the site of the permitted development plan to its original
condition or to a condition acceptable in accordance with standards adopted by the City
for the matter of state interest for which the permit is being granted;
(2) The estimated cost of implementing and successfully maintaining any revegetation
required by the permit.
(3) The estimated cost of completing the permitted development plan; and
(4) The estimated cost of complying with any permit conditions, including mitigation,
monitoring, reporting, and City inspections to ensure compliance with the terms of the
permit.
(C) Estimated cost shall be based on the applicant’s submitted cost estimate. The Director shall
consider the duration of the development plan and compute a reasonable projection of
increases due to inflation over the entire life of the development plan. The Director may
require, as a condition of the permit, that the financial security shall be adjusted upon
receipt of bids.
(D) The financial guarantee may be released in whole or in part with the approval of the
Director only when:
(1) The permit has been surrendered to the Director before commencement of any physical
activity on the site of the approved development plan;
(2) The approved development plan has been abandoned and the site thereof has been
returned to its original condition or to a condition acceptable to the Director in
accordance with standards adopted by the Permit Authority for the matter of state
interest for which the permit is being granted;
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
48
(3) The approved development plan has been satisfactorily completed; or
(4) Applicable guaranteed conditions have been satisfied.
(E) Any security may be cancelled by a surety only upon receipt of the Director’s written
consent which may be granted only when such cancellation will not detract from the
purposes of the security.
(F) If the license to do business in Colorado of any surety upon a security filed pursuant to
these Regulations is suspended or revoked by any State authority, then the permittee, within
sixty (60) days after receiving notice thereof, shall substitute a good and sufficient surety
licensed to do business in the State. Upon failure of the permittee to make substitution of
surety within the time allowed, the Permit AuthorityDirector shall suspend the permit until
proper substitution has been made.
(G) No security is acceptable if signed by or drawn on an institution for or in which the
permittee or any responsible party is an owner, shareholder, or investor other than simply
an account holder.
(H) The Director may determine at any time that a financial guarantee should be forfeited
because of any violation of the permit. The Director shall provide written notice of such
determination to the surety and the permittee of their right to written demand of the Director
within thirty (30) days of receiving written notice from the Director.
(1) If no demand is made within said period, then the Director shall order in writing that
the financial guarantee be forfeited and provide a copy of such order to the surety and
permittee.
(2) If a timely demand is received, the Director shall make good faith efforts to meet with
the permittee and surety within thirty (30) days after the receipt of such demand. At the
meeting the permittee and surety may present any information with respect to the
alleged violation for the Director’s consideration. At the conclusion of any meeting,
the Director shall either withdraw the notice of violation or order in writing that the
financial guarantee should be forfeited and provide a copy of such order to the surety
and permittee.
(I) The Director may require the recording of a lien in favor of the City on real property to be
used in completing the approved development plan and owned in fee by the permittee or
responsible parties in order to further guarantee permit compliance.
(I) (J) If the forfeiture results in inadequate revenue to cover the costs of accomplishing the
purposes of the financial guarantee, the City Attorney shall take such steps as deemed
proper to recover such costs, including imposing and foreclosingure aof the City lien on
real property and/or certifying the same to the County Treasurer for collection in the same
manner as real property taxes, pursuant to Sections 31-20-105 and 106, C.R.S.
(J) (K) The financial security under this Section may be waived, in the Director’s sole
discretion, if a proposed development plan is solely financed by state agencies, a political
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
49
subdivision of the state, or a special or enterprise fund that has established to the Director’s
satisfaction the availability of funds required to complete the proposed development plan.
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 2
Suspension or Revocation of Permits
5-201 Suspension or Revocation of Permits.
(A) If the Director has reason to believe that the permittee has violated any provision of theany
permit or the terms of any regulation for administration of the permit, and such violation
poses a danger to public health, safety, welfare, the environment or wildlife resources, the
health or safety of the public, the Director has the authority to order the immediate
suspension of all operations associated with implementing the approved development plan
and suspension of the permit until the danger has been eliminated. At such time as the
Director has determined the danger is eliminated and any violations of the permit or the
terms of any regulation for administration of the permit, the Director shall withdraw the
suspension. Should the danger be eliminated but violations of the permit still exist, the
Director shall suspend the permit for up to an additional one-hundred and eighty (180) days
pursuant to (B)(3) below.
(B) If the Director has reason to believe that the permittee has violated any provision of any
permit or the terms of any regulation for administration of the permit, and such violation
does not pose a danger to publicthe health, or safety, welfare, the environment or wildlife
resources, of the public, the Director may temporarily suspend the permit for an initial
period of up to thirty (30) days or until the violation is corrected, whichever occurs first.
(1) Before imposing such temporary suspension, the Director shall provide written notice
to the permittee of the specific violation and shall allow the permittee a period of at
least fifteen (15) days to correct the violation from the date notice was provided.
(2) If the permit holder does not agree that there is a violation, the permittee shall, within
fifteen (15) days of the date notice was provided, submit a written response to the
Director detailing why the temporary suspension should not occur. Upon receiving
such response, the Director shall within ten (10) days issue a written response either
withdrawing the notice of violation or imposing the temporary permit suspension. The
Director’s decision is not subject to appeal.
(3) Should a violation remain uncorrected after the initial period of temporary suspension
has elapsed, the Director shall extend in writing the period of temporary suspension for
up to an additional one-hundred and eighty (180) days or until the violation is corrected,
whichever occurs first. Notice of such extension shall be provided to the permittee and
the extended suspension may be appealed pursuant to Chapter 2, Article VI, of the Code
of the City of Fort Collins, however, pending such appeal hearing, the permit
suspension shall remain in effect.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
50
(C) Subsequent to any extended temporary suspension imposed under (B)(3) above, the
Director may permanently revoke the permit upon a written determination that the violation
for which the temporary suspension was premised remains uncorrected. The determination
shall be provided to the permittee and such revocation may be appealed pursuant to Chapter
2, Article VI, of the Code of the City of Fort Collins, however, pending the decision of
such appeal, the permitrevocation shall remain in effect.
(D) The Director may permanently revoke a permit upon a written determination that the
permittee has failed to take substantial steps to initiate the permitted development or
activity within twelve (12) months from the date of the issuance of the permit or within the
timeframe of any extensions granted, or, if such steps have been taken, the permittee has
failed to complete or pursue completion of the development or activity with reasonable
diligence. The determination shall be provided to the permittee and such revocation may
be appealed pursuant to Chapter 2, Article VI, of the Code of the City of Fort Collins,
however, pending such appeal hearing, the revocation shall remain in effect. The
permanent revocation of a permit does not bar the future submittal of a new permit
application for the same, or substantially the same, proposed development plan.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
51
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 3
Permit Review, Renewal, Amendment, Transfer
5-301 Annual Review; Progress Reports.
(A) Within thirty (30) days prior to each annual anniversary date of the granting of a permit,
the permittee shall submit a report detailing any and all activities conducted by the
permittee pursuant to the permit including, but not limited to, a satisfactory showing that
the permit has complied with all conditions of the permit and applicable regulations for
administration of the permit.
(B) Director shall review the report within thirty (30) days from the date of submittal thereof.
If the Director determines, based upon its review, that the permittee was likely to have
violated the provisions of the permit or applicable regulations, or both, the Director shall
make a good faith effort to meet with the permittee to discuss the matter. If the Director
determines after any meeting that the permittee has violated the provisions of the permit or
applicable regulations, or both, the Director may suspend and/or revoke the permit in
accordance with Section 5-201.
(C) Upon fulfillment of all permit conditions, this annual review requirement may be waived
by the Director.
(D) At any time, the Director may require the permittee to submit an interim progress report.
5-302 Permit Renewal.
Permits issued under these Regulations may be renewed following the same procedure for approval
of new permits except the renewal process shall not include the Director’s FONSIFONAI review
pursuant to Section 2-303. The Director may impose additional conditions at the time of renewal
if necessary to ensure that the approved development plan will comply with these Regulations.
5-303 Permit Amendment.
The Director shall require a permit amendment for any material change, as determined by the
Director, in the construction, use, or operation of an approved development plan from the terms
and conditions of an approved permit. The amendment shall be processed in accordance with and
subject to the same procedures and requirements set forth herein for a full permit or administrative
permit except that the Director’s FONSIFONAI review pursuant to Section 2-3043 shall not occur.
5-304 Technical Minor Revision or ModificationNot Constituting a Material Change.
The permittee may apply to the Director for a technical minor revisions or modification to an
issued permit to correct errors or make other modificationchanges to conform the permit to actual
conditions to the extent such minor revision or modification is not a material change to the permit
as determined by the Director. The Director is granted discretion to approve such minor revisions
or modification or to determine that a permit amendment is required pursuant to Section 5-303. In
reviewing a requested minor revision or revisions, the Director shall consider the request in the
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
52
context of previously approved minor revisions to determine whether in the aggregate, the
requested minor revision or revisions constitute a material change.
5-305 Transfer of Permits.
A permit may be transferred only upon the Director’s written consent. The Director must ensure
in approving any transfer that the proposed transferee can and will comply with all the
requirements, terms, and conditions contained in the permit and these regulations; that such
requirements, terms, and conditions remain sufficient to protect the health, welfare, and safety of
the public; and that an adequate guarantee of financial security can be made.
5-306 Inspection.
The Director in their sole discretion is empowered to cause the inspection of any development,
operation, or decommissioning activities related to a permit, including on or off-site mitigation
activities, to ensure compliance with such permit and applicable laws and regulations. The
permittee shall provide reasonable access to property for which the permittee has the authority to
do so and shall make good faith efforts to coordinate access for other property. To the extent
such inspection is ongoing or otherwise subject to advance planning, the Director shall consult
with the permittee to coordinate inspection to minimize potential disruptions. The Director may
retain a third-party consultant to conduct such inspections, including a consultant with
specialized knowledge or training, and the cost of all such inspections shall be the responsibility
of the permittee. The inspections provided for under this Section are in addition to Section
6.26.3.
DRAFT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND REVISION
53
Division 5
Financial Security, Post-Issuance Administration, Enforcement
Section 4
Enforcement
5-401 Enforcement.
Any person engaging in development in a designated area of a state interest or conducting a
designated activity of state interest who does not first obtain a permit pursuant to these Regulations,
who does not comply with permit requirements, or who acts outside the authority of the permit, is
in violation of this Land DevelopmentUse Code and the City may take enforcement action
pursuant to Division 6.262.14 and may additionally take any other action available under these
Regulations and civil or criminal law, including seeking injunctive relief, or revoking or
suspending any permit issued pursuant to these Regulations or any permit issued pursuant to the
Land DevelopmentUse Code or the Code of the City of Fort Collins. These Regulations are not
intended to create third party rights of enforcement.
1041 Regulations –
Project Update
local participation, transparency
and improved environmental
outcomes
Kirk Longstein
Senior Environmental Planner
Rebecca Everette
Planning Manager
November 7, 2022
2HB74-1041 Statutory Process
Public Hearing
Designating
Activity/Area
Moratorium Adopt
Requirements
Accept Permit
Applications
1 2 3 4
September -
October 2021
October 2021 –
December 2022
TBD TBD
3Designation and Moratorium
New/Expanded Domestic
Water/Wastewater
Highways and
Interchanges
Activities of Statewide Interest
September/October/December 2021
Council designated activities and imposed
a moratorium on activities of Statewide
Interest
4Moratorium Scope
Moratorium (January 2022)
Thresholds
Water and Sewer Systems
•Easements greater than 30 feet in width, or
•Within new permanent easements greater than 20 feet in width that are adjacent to existing
easements, or
•Two or more parallel lines that are within 120 square inches of each other when viewed in cross-
section.
Project to upgrade existing water and sewer facilities, including repairing and/or replacing old or outdated
equipment, or installing new equipment
Interchanges associated with arterial highways located within City natural areas or City parks
5Where We’ve Been
June August October
2022
Council Work Session &
v1 Draft Regulations
Published
Public Engagement Legal Review of v2 Draft
Regulations
EngagedFeedback:
Remove exemption loopholes
Concerns with term significant
Tiered review process
Pre-application timeline
Boards/Commissions
Chamber of Commerce
Save the Poudre
Sierra Club
Fort Collins Sustainability Group
Water Providers
Sanitation Districts
CSU
Other Communities
6V2 draft 1041 Regulations Scope
Unnecessary burden
&
Ambiguous approval process
1041 Parameters Version 2 update
Pre-Submittal
Requirements
Adds a 28 day requirement for
Director to make FONAI
determination and a 60 day
time frame for staff to review
and deem application complete
Decision Maker
Eliminates the administrative
permit; makes City Council the
sole decision maker
Stakeholder Feedback
7V2 draft 1041 Regulations Scope
How does 1041 lead to a
better project outcome and
enhance overall community
benefits?
1041 Parameters Version 2 update
Thresholds
Added geographic based
thresholds to designated
activities impacting City Parks,
Natural Areas, Natural Habitat
Buffer Zones, Cultural
resources
Stakeholder Feedback
8V2 draft 1041 Regulations Scope
Concern about term
“significant”
1041 Parameters Version 2 update
Definitions
Reworking of the FONSI to become
the FONAI or finding of negligible
adverse impact.
1.) Change from a significant impact
standard to a review of whether there
are adverse impacts of any kind.
2.) To the extent there are adverse
impacts, mitigation can compensate
for the adverse impacts in order to
meet a standard.
Stakeholder Feedback
9V2 draft 1041 Regulations Scope
Concern about IGA
Option
1041 Parameters Version 2 update
IGAs Section Removed
Stakeholder Feedback
10V2 draft 1041 Regulations Scope
Requirements for
water conservation
go beyond the City’s
appropriate reach
1041 Parameters Version 2 update
Review Standards
Removes requirements related to the
applicant’s system that are not
physically within the scope of the
regulations
Stakeholder Feedback
Can Appeal to
City Council
Can Appeal to
PZ Commission
111041 Regulations Procedural Time Frame
Administrative Permit
Director DecisionStaff ReviewApplication
Complete
Completeness
Review
Application
Submitted
90-days to Decision
90 Day
Continuance
City Council
Hearing
PZ Commission
RecommendationStaff ReviewApplication
Complete
Completeness
Review
Application
Submitted
60-Days 90-days to Hearing
28-Days pre-application review (determine whether permit is required)
121041 Regulations Scope v2
•Designation Procedures
•Definitions
•Exemptions
Applicability
•Determination of Permit Type
•Neighborhood Meeting
•Public Hearing
Approval
Process
•General Standards
•Activity Specific Standards
•Activity Specific Purpose
Review
Standards
•Financial Security
•Inspection/Reporting
•Enforcement
Permit
Administration
•Permit Application (Submittal
Requirements)Exhibits
Revised Approach: Changes in Scope
Major Water Projects •Transmission & DistributionMains
•Water Diversions
•Water Treatment Facility
•Reservoirs
•Storage Tanks Major Wastewater Projects•Wastewater Treatment Plants
•Interceptor & Collector Lines
•Lift Stations Highway Projects•New Highways/ Interchanges/ Collector Highways
•Expansions by 1 Vehicular Lane
•Expansions of Interchanges or Bridges
13V2 1041 Regulations Scope
Water and Wastewater Projects
Located in Natural Area, Park or Other City Property
Located in Natural Habitat Buffer Zone (NHBZ)
Impacts to Historic/Cultural Resources
Highway Projects
Located in Natural Area, Park or Other City Property
Located in Natural Habitat Buffer Zone (NHBZ)
Impacts to Historic/Cultural Resources
May Result in Relocation of Homes or Businesses
Proposed Approach: Geography -Based Thresholds
14Cultural Resources
Historic/Cultural Resources
200’ Buffer
-Designated (City, State, or Federal)
-Eligible (City, State, or Federal)
-Local Corridors consistent with NHBZ
(e.g., Spring Creek, Cache la Poude,
etc
15Land Use Code: Natural Habitat Buffer Zone (NHBZ)
Example:
Natural Habitat Features
Buffer Zone
Standard
Isolated Areas
Shrubland 50 feet
Riparian forest 50 feet
Lakes or reservoirs 100 feet
Wetlands < ⅓ acre in size 50 feet
Irrigation ditches that serve as
wildlife corridors
50 feet
Prairie Dogs Site analysis
Stream Corridors
Boxelder Creek 100 feet
Cache la Poudre 300 feet
Cooper Slough 300 feet
Dry Creek 100 feet
Fossil Creek and Tributaries 100 feet
Spring Creek 100 feet
16Scenario: Natural Habitat Buffer Zone
50’ Buffer
Alternative 3
Alternative 2
Alternative 1
No Permit Required
FONAI Issued, No Permit Required
Full Permit Required
•Consider anticipated adverse impacts + mitigation
•Conformance to City Plans and policies
•Natural hazard risk
•Nuisances
•Hazardous materials risk
17Impact Analysis
Review Standards Evaluate Impacts to:
•Local infrastructure and service delivery
•Recreational opportunities & experience
•Viewsheds & visual character
•Air quality
•Water quality
•Wetlands & riparian areas
•Terrestrial & aquatic animal life
•Terrestrial & aquatic plant life
•Other natural habitats & features
•Significant trees
•Historic & cultural resources
•Soils & geologic conditions
•Disproportionately impacted communities
18SPAR Exemption
Key Considerations:
Advisory vs regulatory
SPAR projects are not evaluated for
compliance with Land Use Code
Alignment with City plan
“Location, Character, and Extent” review
Less rigorous documentation and
analysis
Staff proposed options:
Option 1 –Exempt all projects previously reviewed
through the SPAR process.
Option 2 -Exempt projects previously approved
through the SPAR process.
Option 3 –No exemptions for previously reviewed
SPAR projects.
19Where Are We Going Next?
Timing for Council Consideration
Recommended
Next Steps
•November 15 Consent Agenda Item extending the length of moratorium for 3 months
•Additional time for stakeholder review
•First Reading –December or January
•Second Reading –January or February
Continued Public Engagement
Technical Working groups
Press Release
City website engagement
City Boards and Commissions
1:1 Interviews
Public open Houses
For Questions or Comments, Please Contact:
Kirk Longstein
klongstein@fcgov.com
21
BACKUP SLIDES
22Federal vs Local Jurisdiction
Federal Permitting
documents are identified and
reviewed during pre-
application
Review for concurrence with
mitigation plans covered by
another agency
Buffers are applied and
Mitigation is required for any
adverse impacts to non
jurisdictional wetlands
23SPAR and 1041 Regulations
Parameters SPAR 1041 Regulations
Applicability only public entities covered by statute Council designated activities include water, wastewater and
highway projects
Pre-Submittal Required 60 Day total review period
adds a 28-day requirement for Director to make FONAI
determination and a 60 day time frame for staff to review and
deem application complete
Review Standards
Evaluates Location, Character and Extent
And conformity with the City’s Comprehensive
Plan
Cumulative impact analysis
Decision Maker Planning and Zoning Board
Decision Can Be Overruled
City Council is the sole decision maker
Decision is binding
Financial Security
Required None More detailed requirements regarding inspection and
monitoring of projects.
241041 Regulations v2
1041 Parameters Version 1 (June 2022)Version 2 (October 2022)
Pre-Submittal Required No specific time requirement
1.) adds a 28-day requirement for Director to make FONAI determination and a 60-
day time frame for staff to review and deem application complete
2. Submittal requirements -Alternatives analysis
Using Term Significant Used in various standards and as a way to differentiate
projects subject to the regulations
Reworking of the FONSI to become the FONAI or finding of negligible adverse
impact. 1.) Change from a significant impact standard to a review of whether there
are adverse impacts of any kind. To the extent there are adverse impacts, mitigation
can compensate for the adverse impacts in order to meet a standard.
IGAs Provided as an option to reduce procedural burden on
applications Section Removed
Thresholds No specific thresholds Narrowing of the scope of projects to which the 1041 regulations apply. They include
City Parks, Natural Areas, Natural Habitat Buffer Zones, Cultural resources
Exemptions
Used current definition of development to determine which
projects would be subject to regulations. Definition contains
exemptions for CDOT and utility work within the ROW or
existing easements
Update the definition of development to include work with right away and existing
easements; included a new exemption for private development required to perform
utility or roadwork as part of development project subject to LDC
Arterial & Collector Hwys,
Interchanges
Project based thresholds: easement size, pipe diameters, etc
Added geographic based thresholds to designated activities
1. Are located on (or cross through) an existing or planned future City natural area or
park, whether developed or undeveloped; or
2. Are located within an existing or potential future buffer zone of a natural habitat or
feature, as defined in the Land Use Code; or
3. Have potential to adversely impact historic resources.
New Water & Sanitation
Water Extensions
Decision Maker Administrative permit and Full permit Eliminated the administrative permit; made City Council the sole decision maker
Financial Security Required Yes
1.) Language that allows the City to retain third party experts to assist in review at the
applicant’s cost.
2.) More detailed language regarding inspection and monitoring of projects.
25
261041 Regulations Procedural Time Frame
Proposed Pre-Application Process
Conceptual Review
•Determine 1041 Applicability
•Determine Pre-App Submittal Reqs: Studies and Mitigation
Pre-Application/ FONAI Determination
•Impacts Analysis
•Review Mitigation Approach
•Determine Permit Application
Neighborhood Meeting
•Understand Public Concern
•Refine Permit Application
28 Days
FONAI
Determination
271041 Regulations Scope
•Designation Procedures
•Definitions
•Exemptions
Applicability
•Determination of Permit Type
•Neighborhood Meeting
•Public Hearing
Approval
Process
•General Standards
•Activity Specific Standards
•Activity Specific Purpose
Review
Standards
•Financial Security
•Inspection/Reporting
•Enforcement
Permit
Administration
•Permit Application (Submittal
Requirements)Exhibits
Operations and Maintenance Private Development Subject to LUC
Approved Development with Vested Rights Does Not Meet Definition of Development
Proposed Approach: Exemptions
281041 Regulations Scope
•Designation Procedures
•Definitions
•Exemptions
Applicability
•Determination of Permit Type
•Neighborhood Meeting
•Public Hearing
Approval
Process
•General Standards
•Activity Specific Standards
•Activity Specific Purpose
Review
Standards
•Financial Security
•Inspection/Reporting
•Enforcement
Permit
Administration
•Permit Application (Submittal
Requirements)Exhibits
Operations and Maintenance Approved Development with Valid Building Permit
Approved Development with Vested Rights Does Not Meet Definition of Development
Revised Approach: Definitions & Exemptions
UPDATES
Definition of
Development
include:
1.CDOT projects within
existing ROW
2.City or Public utility
work within existing
easements/ ROW
Administrative Permit Full Permit
Historic/Cultural Resources
NHBZs
City NAs or Parks
291041 Regulations Process
Revised Draft: Permit Hierarchy
Finding of
Negligible Adverse
Impacts (FONAI)
Final
Development
Plan
ROW
Encroachment
Permit
NAD Easement
Policy
City Council as
Decision Maker
30Past ProjectsProject Name Year City Development
Review process
Potential Applicability
to 1041 Regulations
1041 Project-based
Thresholds
1041 Geographic-
Based Thresholds
Golden Currant
pipeline 2020 SPAR YES New domestic water
distribution main Natural Area, NHBZ,
CSU raw water Utility
Extension
2020 SPAR NO Not "domestic water
supply"n/a
CDOT Port of entry 2020 SPAR YES Highway Expansion
Disproportionately
Impacted Community,
City Parks, Natural
Areas, NHBZ,
Historical
NEWT 1 2009 SPAR YES New domestic water
distribution main
City Parks, Natural
Areas, NHBZ,
Historical
NEWT 2 2015 N/A NO Outside of City limits n/a
NEWT 3 2021 SPAR YES New domestic water
distribution main NHBZ, Historical
NISP 2021 SPAR YES New domestic
water distribution main
City Parks, Natural
Areas,NHBZ,
Historical
Utilities – Water Commission
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.416.2146
fcgov.com
2022 WATER COMMISSION ANNUAL WORK PLAN
The 2022 Water Commission work plan is organized consistent with the major responsibilities of
Fort Collins Utilities related to water (“Water,” “Wastewater,” and “Stormwater”). Additionally,
the category “Regional and System-wide Issues” includes topics relevant to the Commission's
goal of maintaining a dialogue on broader water issues, such as regional issues that impact the
Poudre River.
A number of recurring annual activities are described under the appropriate subject areas below.
Bulleted items are specific topics of current importance relevant to the Commission. On an as-
needed basis, the Water Commission also provides input on quasi-judicial matters such as
floodplain variances, easement dedication, and property acquisition or disposition.
In even years City staff typically focus on the Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) process during
which the budget for the following two years is determined and in odd years staff typically focus
on updating strategic plans. Therefore, the Water Commission will engage in the BFO process in
2022.
Key Outcome Area Alignment:
Seven Key Outcome Areas have been identified for City Planning, as indicated below. The main Water
Utilities business areas are aligned with one or more of these outcome areas, as indicated in the introduction to
each section below. Individual items may align with several outcomes. For example, capital projects on
distribution system pipes are typically coordinated with transportation projects (outcome area T) and capital
projects include an art in public places component (outcome area CR). Utilities projects also often have an
element of high performing government (HPG). Alignment at the business area level is indicated below.
NLSH –Neighborhood Livability and Social Health
CR – Culture and Recreation
ECH – Economic Health
ENV – Environmental Health
HPG – High Performing Government
SC – Safe Community
T – Transportation
Water
Key Outcome Area Alignment:
Primary Outcome: Environmental Health (EH)
Secondary Outcomes: Economic Health (ECH) and High Performing Government (HPG)
Significant Linked Strategic Objectives:
• SC 5.5 – Address water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure needs for the protection of people,
property and the environment.
• ENV 4.1 Achieve Climate Action Plan (CAP) 2020 goals and continue progress toward the 2030 goals.
• ENV 4.5 – Develop strategies to improve the community’s climate resiliency.
• ENV 4.6 – Provide a reliable, high-quality water supply.
• ENV 4.7 – Continually improve environmental regulatory performance.
• ECH 3.6 – Invest in utility infrastructure aligned with community development.
• HPG 7.8 – Maintain assets to reduce lifecycle costs while improving reliability and accessibility.
1. Provide input on planning and policies related to raw and treated water supply, such as
the Water Supply and Demand Management Policy and raw water acquisition policies.
2. Provide input and guidance on regional water supply collaboration opportunities.
3. Provide input on ditch company share rentals and other surplus raw water rental rates.
4. Review and provide input on water conservation programs and activities.
5. Address educational topics that prepare the Commission for business related to water.
6. Participate in educational and public outreach efforts related to water.
7. Review and provide input on annual capital projects and capital improvement plans.
8. Provide input on programs that protect water sources and improve watershed health.
9. Provide input on specific topics that are relevant to the Commission.
Specific topics of interest to the Commission in 2022 include:
a. Utilities’ response to the Halligan Water Supply Project Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS), ongoing mitigation planning and continued implementation of the
design phases of the reservoir project
b. Impacts of Cameron Peak Fire on water supply amount and quality and Utilities’
implementation of post-fire watershed recovery plans
c. Utilities’ plan for incorporating analysis of the recently produced Water Supply
Vulnerability Study Draft Report into operation plans, policy, projects, integrated
resources planning etc.
Other potential topics for 2022 include:
i. A field trip to a water supply site (e.g. Gateway Park, Horsetooth outlet, fire-
damaged watershed)
ii. Develop conservation metrics and scale funding based on response and progress
iii. Public education for raw water usage, e.g. irrigation of parks
iv. Landscape standards and relationship to allotment fees for new and existing
commercial customers.
Wastewater
Key Outcome Area Alignment:
Primary Outcome: Environmental Health (ENV)
Secondary Outcomes: High Performing Government (HPG) Significant Linked Strategic Objectives:
• SC 5.5 – Address water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure needs for the protection of people,
property and the environment.
• ENV 4.1 Achieve Climate Action Plan (CAP) 2020 goals and continue progress toward the 2030 goals.
• ENV 4.3 – Achieve 2020 Energy Policy goals and work towards Climate Action goals for carbon
neutrality. Work towards long term net zero energy goals within the community and the City
organization using a systems approach.
• ENV 4.4 – Achieve the 2020 Road to Zero Waste goals and work toward the 2030 zero waste goals.
• ENV 4.7 – Continually improve environmental regulatory performance.
• ENV 4.8 – Protect and enhance natural resources on City-owned properties and throughout the
community.
• HPG 7.8 – Maintain assets to reduce lifecycle costs while improving reliability and accessibility.
1. Provide input on planning and policies related to wastewater, such as wastewater
strategic plans dealing with infrastructure financing, workforce development, nutrient
regulations, tertiary treatment, and public/private financing options.
2. Provide input on annual business such as wastewater rates and capital improvements.
3. Address educational topics that prepare the Commission for business related to
wastewater.
4. Participate in educational and public outreach efforts related to wastewater.
5. Review and provide input on annual capital projects and capital improvement plans.
6. Provide input on specific topics that are relevant to the Commission.
Specific topics of interest to the Commission in 2022 include:
a. Developing partnerships to reduce nonpoint source pollution of Nitrogen and
Phosphorous into the Poudre River as a way to reduce spending the money on
treatment at the Drake and Mulberry Water Reclamation Facilities.
b. What new and emerging nutrient regulations may require in additional protocols,
equipment and expense
Other potential topics for 2022 include:
i. Industrial pretreatment program
ii. Graywater and reuse opportunities, particularly in the commercial sector
iii. Impact of micro-plastics in the Poudre River watershed upstream and downstream
of Fort Collins
iv. State of the art in wastewater treatment and Utilities’ consideration and
implementation of plans regarding biomass, biogas, fertilizer capture, and treated
water reuse
Stormwater
Key Outcome Area Alignment:
Primary Outcome: Safe Community (SC)
Secondary Outcomes: Environmental Health (ENV) and High Performing Government (HPG)
Significant Linked Strategic Objectives:
• SC 5.5 – Address water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure needs for the protection of people,
property and the environment.
• ENV 4.1 Achieve Climate Action Plan (CAP) 2020 goals and continue progress toward the 2030 goals.
• ENV 4.7 – Continually improve environmental regulatory performance.
• ENV 4.8 – Protect and enhance natural resources on City-owned properties and throughout the
community.
• HPG 7.8 – Maintain assets to reduce lifecycle costs while improving reliability and accessibility.
1. Provide input on planning and policies related to stormwater, such as revisions to the
Stormwater Master Plans and Low Impact Development (LID) guidelines.
2. Provide input on annual business such as stormwater rates, MS4 (Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer Systems) reporting and program accomplishments.
3. Address educational topics that prepare the Commission for business related to
stormwater.
4. Participate in educational and public outreach efforts with emphasis on improving and
enhancing customer awareness and understanding of stormwater programs.
5. Review and provide input on annual capital projects and capital improvement plans.
6. Provide input on specific topics that are relevant to the Commission.
Specific topics of interest to the Commission in 2022 include:
a. An update on RiskMAP including a discussion of changes to the timeline and
comments provided by Utilities
b. Discussion of Council and staff priorities for stream restoration projects
c. Ongoing design efforts for Downtown basins such as the Oak Street project
Other potential topics for 2022 include:
i. Funding and application of Canal Importation Ponds and Outfall (CIPO) style
improvements to basins other than West Spring Creek
ii. Explanation of prioritization of Stormwater capital projects and the messaging to
the public of that prioritization
Regional and System-wide Issues
Key Outcome Area Alignment:
Regional issues typically are related to one or more Utilities business areas (Water, Wastewater, Stormwater)
on a larger scale beyond the Utilities service area, and consequently interface with regional neighbors and in
some cases at a state or federal level. System-wide issues impact one or more Utilities areas. Alignment with
Key Outcome Areas depends on each item. For example, topics related to raw water supplies are aligned as per
the Water business area described above.
1. Provide input on planning and policies related to regional issues that impact Fort Collins'
water.
2. Participate in regional dialogue (e.g., annual Tri-City meeting, South Platte Roundtable
meetings, and coordination with other City Commissions and commissions).
3. Provide input on specific topics that are relevant to the Commission.
Specific topics of interest to the Commission in 2022 include:
a. Update on the state of Utilities’ billing software improvements
b. Develop and maintain partnerships with water districts and neighboring cities and
towns for issues such as fire recovery and watershed restoration, stream restoration
and other issues that impact multiple entities
c. Development of a longer-term arrangement with North Poudre for exchanging
agricultural and Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT) rights during dry years
d. Short- and long-term impact of COVID-19 on staffing, operations, and financials
across all water utilities
e. Coordination of water utilities planning with the City’s Climate Action Plan efforts
Other potential topics for 2022 include:
i. Projects in the Poudre River corridor, including removal of diversion structures,
stream restoration, recreational uses and impacts, and the Natural Areas flow
augmentation project
ii. Continued development of mitigation measures for impacts of the Northern
Integrated Supply Project (NISP) and Halligan Water Supply Project
iii. Leadership in development of a Regional Integrated Resources Program
iv. Continue coordination and collaboration with the North Front Range Water
Quality Planning Association